Published

2 years ago

July 17, 2024

Alice Rush

Welcome to Carbon Brief’s Cropped.
We handpick and explain the most important stories at the intersection of climate, land, food and nature over the past fortnight.

Key developments

UK election impacts

LABOUR’S ENVIRONMENT PRIORITIES: The UK’s new Labour government has started to outline its priorities, with the new minister for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), Steve Reed, setting out his five priorities in a video posted to Twitter. These were, he said: “Cleaning up British rivers, lakes and seas; creating a roadmap to move Britain to a zero-waste economy; supporting farmers to boost Britain’s food security; ensuring nature’s recovery; and protecting communities from flooding.” Edie reported that the UK “ranks in the bottom 10% of nations globally in terms of biodiversity intactness”, and that it is nowhere near its national goal of protecting 30% of its land and sea by 2030.

AGRICULTURE PLANS: However, a budget for farming was notably absent from the Labour manifesto. Nick von Westenholz, the National Farmers Union’s (NFU) director for strategy, told Euractiv last week that setting the budget for the environmental land management schemes (Elms), which will replace the EU’s multimillion farming subsidy programme by 2027, was “crucial”. Under Elms, farmers can receive subsidies for actions such as reducing pesticide use, planting wildflowers and preventing groundwater pollution. (See Carbon Brief’s 2023 explainer for more details.) Making the Elms subsidies financially attractive to farmers was a key issue, von Westenholz said: “There is a concern about the budget not being sufficient and that there won’t be enough of a business case for farmers to adopt the scheme”. Last week, Carbon Brief analysed the climate issues that the new Labour government will have to address, including those on land, agriculture and nature.

CONSERVATIONISTS REACT: Inkcap Journal summarised the positive, but cautious, reactions of conservation champions to Labour’s victory. Charities including the RSPB and CPRE urged the new prime minister to “act quickly on nature”, highlighting that upcoming decisions will “affect all UK wildlife immensely”. The Wildlife Trusts commended Labour’s “welcome commitments on nature and climate”, but published a list of priorities for the new government, including a review of the Environmental Improvement Plan and increasing the budget for wildlife-friendly farming. Experts also shared their views with Carbon Brief on what Labour’s priorities should be for climate action.

African farmers’ woes

DOUBLE THREAT: In the Conversation, University of Cape Town researcher Dr Vuyisile Moyo described the challenges facing farmers in Zimbabwe due to the “combination of heat, droughts and floods caused by climate change, and water contamination and damaged land caused by illegal, small-scale mining”. There are an estimated 400,000 illegal, small-scale miners in the country and their operations have resulted in “deforestation, land degradation, water pollution and loss of biodiversity”, Moyo wrote. One farmer told Moyo: “My farm was encroached by the artisanal miners who believed that there is a lot of gold there. My farmland was dug all over and now I no longer have land for crop production.”

MALNUTRITION AND DROUGHT: Al Jazeera carried a gallery of photos from drought-stricken Zimbabwe, with one farmer telling the outlet: “I did not harvest anything after all my effort and using all our savings to buy seeds.” Malnutrition is on the rise in the eastern Zimbabwean district of Mudzi, with cases jumping “by about 20%” over the past three months. The outlet added that “Zimbabwe and neighbouring Malawi and Zambia are among the countries in southern Africa most affected by malnutrition” amid the drought. In nearby Namibia, cattle sales have increased by nearly 50% as farmers facing the “biting effects of drought” have been forced to sell off their herds, the Namibian reported. As a result of the influx of cattle to the market, producers’ prices declined by nearly 4% since last year, the outlet added.

‘FOOD SECURITY CRISIS’: In South Africa’s Western Cape province, “informal settlements have been waterlogged for days” following heavy rains, Ground Up reported. Many of the people living in these settlements are “farm workers who have been evicted from farms they used to live at”, the South African outlet wrote. The Associated Press reported that “a food security crisis lies ahead” for Kenya following devastating floods that impacted the country beginning in mid-March. And local NGOs told Devex that flooding across east Africa has left children at risk of malnutrition “because of lack of food and medical services”.

Spotlight

Murky waters

In this spotlight, Carbon Brief unpacks the agenda ahead of the International Seabed Authority, as it resumes negotiations to frame rules for deep-sea mining.

The controversial possibility of mining the deep sea for critical minerals has been catapulted to the spotlight in the past few years, from investigations into the work of the International Seabed Authority (ISA) to late-night comedians in the US running dedicated segments.

Triggered by a move by Nauru in 2021, the ISA has been “under pressure” to finalise rules to regulate deep-sea mineral exploitation or risk the possibility of assessing mining applications without them.

That “what-if” scenario has become one of “what-now”, as the ISA’s 36-member council has already passed the July 2023 deadline to draw up this mining code. This atmosphere of uncertainty has since been met by a growing chorus of 27 governments that have called for some form of ban, moratorium or pause on deep-sea mining.

On Tuesday, the ISA resumed its 29th annual session in Kingston, Jamaica, with three crucial points on the agenda for its council and assembly: the debate over the mining code and a moratorium, the election of its secretary general and, for the first time ever, a discussion on the need for a general policy to protect and preserve the marine environment.

“All states have said that they don’t want [mineral] exploitation without regulation, but just how robust that regulation is, that’s the fault line,” Julian Jackson, project director of seabed mining at Pew Charitable Trusts, told Carbon Brief. According to Jackson, there are still “30 outstanding, big policy issues” to be resolved, from “permissible levels of environmental harm” – such as thresholds for toxicity – to issues of compensation and liability. He added:

“These are very technical negotiations, with yet more detailed standards and guidelines remaining to be addressed, all being done in an international, multilateral setting with very divergent views and not enough time.”

While the groundswell calling for a moratorium has grown, with banks and companies joining the fray, senior lecturer at the Borneo Marine Institute Dr Sharifah Nora Syed Ibrahim points to the fact that developed countries such as Norway have moved in the opposite direction. She told Carbon Brief:

“Norway wants to keep the option of deep-sea mining open, including within its national waters, because if oil is being phased out due to the climate movement, what other main natural resources does Norway have, other than fisheries?”

Who secures the ISA’s top post, which holds sway over the deep sea’s future, has been the subject of a huge scandal in recent weeks. Earlier this month, a New York Times investigation pointed to “allegations of possible payments to help secure votes” and attempts “to entice a candidate to withdraw from a race” amid complaints of misuse of agency funds by ISA chief Michael Lodge, who is currently eyeing a third term at the top.

While Lodge responded to the Times in a six-page statement describing the story as a “collation of vague, unsubstantiated, unfounded and anonymous rumours”, observers told Carbon Brief the allegations were being discussed on the first day of the talks.

“The science [on impacts] is way behind, the regulations are also way behind,” said Jackson:

“In the meanwhile, how do you have a multilateral organisation mired in allegations of conflicts of interest governing what is still so poorly understood?”

News and views

ARGENTINA BEEF: The consumption of beef in Argentina has fallen to a historical low, with demand forecasted to fall to the “lowest level in a century”, according to the Buenos Aires Times. A report from the Rosario Board of Trade found that annual beef consumption is now around 45kg per person, down from a peak of more than 100kg in the 1950s. Bloomberg attributed the decline to skyrocketing beef prices amidst a national recession. However, a shift to poultry, pork and plant-based diets due to greater nutritional awareness amongst consumers is also contributing, the newswire said. Argentina remains one of the biggest beef consumers globally, surpassing the UK and US (18 and 38kg per capita, respectively).

EU POLICY: The farmers’ organisation European Coordination Via Campesina has called on the EU to control agricultural prices and abandon free-trade agreements, including the long-stalled deal with the Mercosur South American trading bloc, Euractiv reported. “Farmers fear the Mercosur deal would result in markets being flooded with cheaper products”, it said. A separate Euractiv piece said that the European People’s Party is aiming to take the post of agriculture commissioner in the European Parliament in a move to solidify itself as “the farmers’ party”. Meanwhile, US paper producers have warned that new EU regulations requiring them to trace the sources of timber will cause price increases and shortages of diapers, sanitary pads and hygiene products, with Bloomberg reporting that “pulp supply chains are too diffuse to track all trees”.

‘CARBON LAUNDRY’: Brazil is “rac[ing]” to launch “one of the first major carbon emissions trading systems in the developing world”, Dialogue Earth reported. The emissions trading system aims to cover major polluting companies from sectors such as steel and cement, it added, but they would also be allowed to offset their emissions by buying credits from the voluntary market. This would need “careful regulation”, experts told the outlet, to ensure Brazil does not become “the carbon laundry of the world”. Dialogue Earth also covered controversies around “blue carbon” trading in China, where “most of the credits…involve the scientifically contentious matter of carbon sequestration by shellfish and seaweed”. Scroll.in, meanwhile, reported on “dubious” credits being generated by Himalayan hydropower projects.

WATER WARS: Amid ongoing drought in the south-western US, the country is “looking to parched northern Mexico to solve its water shortage”, Excelsior reported. The newspaper noted that the latest agreement between the two countries marks “the third consecutive year of water cuts from the Colorado River to Mexico”. In return for the reduction, Mexico will receive $65m “that will be used to improve water resources infrastructure”. Nearly two-thirds of northern cities and towns are already impacted by water shortages, including “a dozen municipalities living in a state of emergency”, Excelsior said. It added that 14 members of congress from Texas have requested the US “suspend aid to Mexico…until Mexico pays off its current water debt”.

DEFORESTATION DECREASE: Last year, Colombia “achieved its lowest deforestation rate ever recorded”, reporting a 36% decrease compared to the previous year, City Paper Bogota said. (Historical records in the country go back to 2000.) The figure represents a decrease of more than 50% over the last two years, “surpassing the initial target” set in the country’s national development plan, the outlet said. It quoted Colombian environment minister Susana Muhamad, who said: “It is a truly iconic year in this fight against deforestation.” However, Colombia Reports said that the reduction is “feared to be temporary” and that “the first quarter of this year indicated that deforestation had been going up again”.

DISPUTED MAPS: Indigenous communities in India’s western state of Gujarat have complained that district authorities rejected their forest rights claims based solely on satellite imagery collected by an autonomous state body, over other evidence such as testimonies and site inspections, IndiaSpend reported. Activists accused the GEER Foundation of “a lack of transparency”. Villagers asked to vacate their lands within 10 days told the outlet that the “notices came as a shock, as GPS and satellite imagery exercises conducted by local NGOs” support their claims. An official told IndiaSpend that the foundation “has now agreed to share their maps”, but said that “people give arbitrary estimates” of the size of their forest plots. Separately, the Financial Times reported that Australia has asked for a delay of the EU deforestation law regime citing “incorrect data”, with a spokesperson stating that “[t]he EU’s map is not a single source of truth”.

Watch, read, listen

BALANCING ACT: On her Feed the Planet podcast, Prof Sarah Bridle talked to researcher Barbara Bray about how to balance humans’ health with that of the planet.

COMEBACK KID: Mongabay carried a two-part series on the “re-introduction” of the Spix’s macaw that went extinct in the wild, but now faces an “uncertain future”.

STICKER SHOCK: In a new video, Al Jazeera explored how climate change has played a role in the global increases in food prices and inflation.

PORK OUT: Vox carried a long read that looked at how factory farming was “shoring up public support” by “funding favourable research” from US public university scientists.

New science

Climate change impact on Mediterranean viticultural regions and site-specific climate risk-reduction strategies

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change

Grape growers in parts of the Mediterranean should consider reducing their crop’s exposure to sun and optimising water usage to help vineyards adapt to climate change, according to new research. The researchers aimed to understand how climate change will impact wine-growing areas in Portugal, Italy, Turkey and Morocco. Using scenarios under moderate (RCP4.5) and very high emissions (RCP8.5), the researchers compared the main climate-related challenges these locations will face and assess the “best strategies to reduce the impacts of climate change at the national and regional levels”. The conclusions of the study “may support local growers” in optimising “sustainable production under changing climates”, the researchers wrote.

Severe droughts reduce river navigability and isolate communities in the Brazilian Amazon

Communications Earth & Environment

A new study found that severe droughts “routinely disrupt inland water transport and isolate local populations” in the Brazilian Amazon, resulting in restricted access to food, medicine, education and more. By combining historical records of river streamflow, maps of human settlements and news reports, researchers analysed the impacts of lowered river levels on communities near the Amazon River. They found that droughts over the past two decades “have not only caused exceptional low-water anomalies across the Amazon basin, but also dramatically increased the duration of the low-water period”, contributing to communities’ isolation. They concluded: “Given this new reality, Amazon countries must develop long-term strategies for mitigation, adaptation and disaster response.”

Four decades of data indicate that planted mangroves stored up to 75% of the carbon stocks found in intact mature stands

Science Advances

New research found that planted mangroves store nearly three-quarters of the amount of carbon stored by untouched mangroves over 20 to 40-year timescales. Analysing data from 684 planted mangrove stands around the world, researchers looked at the carbon storage both below and above ground and determined how carbon storage rates change over time. They found that planted stands that incorporate more than one mangrove species “would maximise [carbon] accumulation within the biomass compared to monospecific planting”. The authors concluded: “Our models also facilitate goal setting; performance measure development; and progress tracking in restoration, rehabilitation or afforestation projects.”

In the diary

15 July-2 August: Second part of the 29th Session of the International Seabed Authority Assembly and Council | Kingston, Jamaica
22-26 July: 27th Session of the FAO Committee on Forestry | Rome
27 July-2 August: 61st Session of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC-61) | Sofia, Bulgaria

This is an online version of Carbon Brief’s fortnightly Cropped email newsletter. Subscribe for free here.

Cropped is researched and written by Dr Giuliana Viglione, Aruna Chandrasekhar, Daisy Dunne, Orla Dwyer and Yanine Quiroz. Please send tips and feedback to cropped@carbonbrief.org.

The post Cropped 17 July 2024: Climate change and wine; Seabed mining talks; Argentina’s beef habit appeared first on Carbon Brief.

Cropped 17 July 2024: Climate change and wine; Seabed mining talks; Argentina’s beef habit

Climate Change

Broken debt system must be fixed to confront future climate shocks

Published

11 hours ago

April 14, 2026

Alice Rush

Mae Buenaventura is the manager of the debt justice programme of the Asian Peoples’ Movement on Debt and Development, a regional alliance of peoples’ movements, community organizations, coalitions, NGOs and networks

A potentially historic shift in public debt governance is set to unfold in Washington DC this week as Global South governments take a collective stand to stop a “silent killer” of development financing.

The first-ever UN-hosted borrowers’ forum will officially be launched on April 15 on the sidelines of the 2026 Spring Meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. Led by five convening countries – Zambia, Egypt, Nepal, the Maldives and Pakistan – the initiative is one of the key wins of last year’s 4th Financing for Development Conference (FFD4) in Sevilla, Spain.

The forum’s mandate is to establish a platform for borrower countries, supported by a UN secretariat, “to discuss technical issues, share information and experiences in addressing debt challenges, increase access to technical assistance and capacity-building in debt management, coordinate approaches and strengthen borrower countries’ voices in the global debt architecture”.

Instead of facing lenders alone, these countries will now use a UN-backed platform to share technical expertise and coordinate their approach to a global debt system that is fundamentally broken.

Debt grips climate-vulnerable nations

The human cost of the current debt architecture is staggering. According to the UN trade and development agency, UNCTAD, more than 40% of the global population – roughly 3.4 billion people – live in countries where the government is forced to spend more on debt payments than on the health, education and social protection of its citizens.

In so-called low-income countries, governments spend an average of 7.5% of their total budgets on debt service, with interest payments consuming up to 20% of total government revenue in these regions.

The Philippines is a case study in this financial stranglehold. It is part of a global majority forced to watch its public services crumble and infrastructure lag while its wealth is siphoned off to satisfy foreign lenders.

The policy of automatic appropriations – a legacy of the rule of late former President Ferdinand Marcos Sr. – mandates that debt servicing takes precedence over any other public expenditure, effectively placing the demands of lenders above the needs of the Filipino people. Even as it faces a $1.5 trillion regional financing gap to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030, its hands remain tied by a legal framework that values credit ratings over human lives.

Jul 3, 2025

Finance

UN development conference backs innovative ways to boost climate finance

Leaders push for better financial systems at the Financing for Development summit to help poor nations cope with climate and economic shocks

Read more
Apr 10, 2026

News

GEF raises $3.9bn ahead of funding deadline, $1bn below previous budget

Amid aid cuts, donor governments pledge less nature and climate funding to the Global Environment Facility (GEF), with the four-year package to be finalised in late May

Read more
Apr 8, 2026

News

Charging worries, high prices put brakes on EV growth in Bangladesh

Sales of e-bikes and rickshaws are up amid queues at fuel stations, but a lack of charging infrastructure and high prices still deter many Bangladeshis from going electric

Read more

As a “middle-income country” (MIC), the Philippines is stuck in a frustrating purgatory. It is often deemed “too wealthy” for the G20’s debt-relief framework, yet too poor to absorb global economic shocks. Last year, Finance Undersecretary Joven Balbosa hit the nail on the head when he called for support that goes “beyond the simplistic income categorization” that ignores a country’s actual vulnerabilities.

Without an inclusive and equitable global debt architecture, nations including the Philippines are left to navigate catastrophic climate risks and economic shocks with zero fiscal breathing space.

No respite during climate disasters

The regional evidence of this systemic failure is everywhere. Take Pakistan, which in 2022 was hit by catastrophic flooding that submerged a third of the country and caused billions in losses. Despite this climate-driven disaster, World Bank data shows that Pakistan made payments in 2023 of $11.8 billion for public and publicly guaranteed (PPG) external debt, while its PPG external debt reached $93 billion that same year, surpassing pre-pandemic debt of $87 billion (2020).

Sri Lanka followed IMF prescriptions throughout 16 lending programs since 1991, only to become the first Asian country this century to default. Its MIC status prevents application for debt relief and restructuring measures. Today, the Sri Lankan people bear the brunt of harsh conditionalities, including raising VAT from 8% to 15%, slashing food and fuel subsidies, and the erosion of hard-earned worker pensions.

Residents sit in a Rescue 1122 boat as they evacuate from the flooded area, following monsoon rains and rising water levels of the Chenab River, in Qasim Bela village on the outskirts of Multan in Punjab province, Pakistan, September 11, 2025. REUTERS/Quratulain Asim

Currently, the global rules of lending and borrowing are set by a “creditors’ club” composed of the IMF, the World Bank and the Global Sovereign Debt Roundtable it set up, and the Paris Club.

These institutions measure “debt sustainability” through a narrow lens of a country’s capacity to make timely repayments. They largely ignore internal economic inequalities, gender disparities and the existential threat of climate change.

Crises should trigger debt service cancellation

By organising the new borrowers’ forum, the Global South is signalling that the era of passive “standard-setting” by lenders is over.

The ultimate goal for global civil society and debt justice movements is the establishment of a UN Debt Convention; a democratic, binding and inclusive framework that governs both lenders and borrowers. This mechanism would ensure that debt restructuring and cancellation are sufficient to allow countries to fulfill their international human rights obligations and implement necessary climate actions.

Green Climate Fund picks locations for five developing country hubs

To be truly transformative, debt sustainability analyses must align with human rights and sustainable development needs. This means conducting impact assessments – both before and after loans are issued – to identify “illegitimate” debts that do not benefit the public.

Crucially, we need an automatic debt service cancellation mechanism that triggers during extreme climatic, environmental or health shocks. We also need a binding global debt registry to ensure that every loan is transparent and subject to public scrutiny.

Whether the borrowers’ forum becomes a true milestone depends on its courage to challenge the status quo. We can no longer allow debt to act as a “silent killer” of our future. It is time to demand a financial system that serves humanity, not just the balance sheets of the powerful.

The post Broken debt system must be fixed to confront future climate shocks appeared first on Climate Home News.

Broken debt system must be fixed to confront future climate shocks

Climate Change

Join Greenpeace to save Scott Reef from Woodside’s dirty gas

Published

11 hours ago

April 14, 2026

Alice Rush

Greenpeace and allies will be protesting outside Woodside’s Annual General Meeting to show the WA and federal governments strong community opposition to Woodside’s proposal to drill for gas at Scott Reef.

What: Protest outside Woodside Energy’s Annual General Meeting

When: 8am Thursday 23rd April 2026Where: Kagoshima Park (on the corner of Great Eastern Highway and Bolton Avenue)

RSVP now and join the protest

What’s at stake

Scott Reef is a pristine ocean ecosystem off the north-west coast of Australia.

It is home to endangered and endemic species, including pygmy blue whales and the dusky sea snake, and a nesting ground for green sea turtles. Scott Reef is a place of extraordinary natural beauty, and a vital marine environment that supports a wide range of marine life.

What Woodside is proposing

Dirty fossil fuel corporation, Woodside Energy, is seeking approval to drill more than 50 gas wells underneath and around Scott Reef as part of its Browse project.

The gas would be extracted and transported to the Burrup Hub, the most polluting fossil fuel project in Australia. This proposal would industrialise the doorstep of Australia’s largest freestanding oceanic reef system – threatening the marine life that relies on it and the climate.

Why this can’t go ahead

The WA Environmental Protection Authority has already identified the risks of this project as “unacceptable”, issuing a preliminary rejection.

Serious concerns include:

The risk of an oil spill
Impacts on pygmy blue whales
Damage to green sea turtle nesting grounds

These risks are severe, and potentially irreversible. But the decision hasn’t been made yet. The project is still being assessed.

The Federal Environment Minister is approaching a decision that will determine whether Scott Reef is protected – or vulnerable to decades of industrial gas destruction.

This is a defining moment.