The copper market has experienced a notable uptrend in 2024, witnessing a surge of over 20% from mid-February until late May. But a few days after, copper prices dipped below $10,000 per metric ton amid growing global inventories and sluggish U.S. job openings data.
This fuels expectations of potential interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve this year, while adversely impacting major copper stocks.
Inventories on the Shanghai Futures Exchange surged to levels not seen since 2020, at 321,695 tons, alongside steady inflows into Asian depots monitored by the London Metal Exchange in recent weeks, hitting 118,950 tons, the highest since April 24.
This inventory buildup, typically during declining inventories, has exerted downward pressure on prices following copper’s recent record high above $11,100 (almost $5/pound).

This is driven partly by speculation from funds anticipating increased use of the metal in green energy sectors and concerns over potential supply shortages. However, the steep and erratic price movements deterred some physical copper consumers.
Copper Crunch: A Market in Turmoil
This year, base metals experienced a surge in expectations of reduced U.S. interest rates and indications of China’s economic recovery from the pandemic’s aftermath. However, the persistent increase in exchange inventories suggests that current buyer demand is adequately met, challenging bullish forecasts of a price uptrend.
Carsten Menke, head of next-generation research at Julius Baer, remarked that the copper market appears adequately supplied, dampening hopes for a rapid price rebound. He anticipates consolidation in the market during the summer.
Copper mining stocks, such as Freeport-McMoRan Inc. and BHP, also experienced declines, with the former down by as much as 4.8% while the latter saw a 2.0% drop.
Freeport-McMoRan Stocks Tumbling Down
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE: FCX) holds a prominent position in the global natural resources sector, primarily focusing on copper mining alongside gold and molybdenum exploration and production.
With copper as its primary revenue driver, Freeport has witnessed significant stock performance over the past year. It outpaced the S&P 500 Index with a 52-week return of 50.5%, compared to the index’s 24.4% gain. Year-to-date, the copper miner has surged around 23%, aligning closely with analysts’ mean target price of $52.20.
In the first quarter of 2024, Freeport-McMoRan reported robust financial results, exceeding Wall Street expectations. The company recorded a revenue of $6.32 billion, marking a 17% increase from the same period in 2023.
Despite a 29% decline in net income to $473 million due to higher expenses, the earnings per share (EPS) surpassed analysts’ estimates at $0.32. Freeport’s copper production for the quarter reached 1.1 billion pounds, up from 965 million pounds a year earlier, primarily driven by a significant output increase from its Indonesian operations. But with the recent plunge in copper prices, Freeport stocks also fall by up to 4.8%.

While Freeport’s valuation metrics suggest a premium valuation compared to historical averages and some industry peers, the strong demand outlook for copper amidst the green energy transition could potentially justify this premium.
BHP Copper Shares Dropping
The BHP Group Ltd (ASX: BHP) share price also witnesses a decline, reflecting a broader downturn in the mining sector.
Shares in the S&P/ASX 200 Index mining giant closed 1.2% lower at AUD$44.28. As of Wednesday morning, shares are trading at AUD$43.71 each, marking a further decrease of 1.3%. Meanwhile, the ASX 200 has seen a modest increase of 0.2% during the same period.
The decline in BHP’s share price on the ASX mirrors a similar trend in the miner’s international listings. In the United States, where BHP is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), shares closed down 2.2% overnight.

The primary reason behind the downward pressure appears to be a notable retreat in metal prices.
Copper, which serves as BHP’s second-largest revenue generator after iron ore, experienced a 2.0% decline overnight, settling at US$9,945 per tonne on June 4. Despite still hovering near historic highs, the copper price has retraced about 9% since May 20.
Similarly, the iron ore price recorded a 2.1% drop overnight, reaching US$107.65 per tonne. Notably, on May 7, this vital steel-making metal was priced just below US$120 per tonne, having declined from its peak of US$143 per tonne in early January.
BHP’s merge proposal with Anglo American, which was put off, aims to cement its position as the world’s leading copper producer. If otherwise, the merged entity would have hold substantial copper assets, including key mines in South America, further solidifying BHP’s dominance in the copper market.
What’s The Future of Copper?
Despite this falling trend in copper prices and stocks, analysts remain optimistic. Hedge fund manager Pierre Andurand has made a bold prediction, suggesting that copper prices might increase to $40,000 per tonne in four years or more. This projection stems from the increasing electrification of various global industries, notably electric vehicles (EVs), solar panels, wind farms, and data centers.
Similarly recognizing copper’s pivotal role in facilitating the transition toward green energy, analysts advocate for investing in mining stocks poised to capitalize on these emerging trends.
The demand for copper in the transport sector alone is forecasted to surge by 11x by 2050, compared to levels observed in 2022. Notably, EVs, which incorporate extensive copper wiring, are a significant contributor to this demand increase.
Furthermore, the requirement for copper to expand the global electricity grid is anticipated to grow by 4.8x by 2050, compared to 2022 figures. And according to BloombergNEF estimates, the projected copper supply deficit is expected to reach nearly 10 million tonnes by 2030.
Despite the recent downturn in copper prices and mining stocks, analysts remain optimistic about the long-term prospects of the copper market. With projections of soaring demand driven by the electrification of global industries, particularly in the transport and energy sectors, copper continues to play a crucial role in the transition towards green and sustainable technologies.
The post Copper Prices Are Plunging at Over 2% After Hitting Near 52-Week High appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

