Connect with us

Published

on

COP30 in the Amazon Kicks Off: A Make-or-Break Moment for Global Climate Action

The 30th United Nations Climate Change Conference, or COP30, will take place in Belém, Brazil, from 10 to 21 November 2025. Nearly 200 countries will meet to review progress under the Paris Agreement and plan the next steps to limit global warming.

The summit’s location is symbolic. Belém lies at the edge of the Amazon Rainforest, one of Earth’s greatest carbon sinks. The Amazon stores billions of tonnes of carbon and helps regulate global weather. Holding COP30 there highlights that protecting nature is central to solving the climate crisis.

This event comes ten years after the Paris Agreement and halfway to 2030 — the deadline for many national climate targets. It is a key checkpoint for updating national climate plans and accelerating real-world action.

The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) says emissions are dropping in some areas. But they aren’t falling quickly enough to reach the 1.5 °C goal. If current policies continue, scientists warn that the world could warm by 2.6 °C to 2.8 °C by the end of the century. COP30 could become a turning point — or another missed chance.

Why COP30 Could Redefine Climate Progress

The urgency of this conference cannot be overstated. Global climate action is falling short. Many countries have yet to deliver on past promises.

Developing nations continue to call for fairer climate finance. The long-promised $100 billion per year from wealthy nations is still unmet. OECD reports show that $115.9 billion was mobilized in 2022, surpassing the target but still disputed in terms of disbursement efficiency.

The European Union reported about €28.6 billion in public funding for climate action in 2023. The figure is helpful, but far from what is needed. Some negotiators are pushing for a new goal of $300 billion per year by 2035.

Another major focus is on forests and biodiversity. Brazil plans to showcase the Amazon’s global role and promote solutions to stop deforestation. Healthy forests help offset emissions, support local economies, and preserve biodiversity.

COP30 will also connect climate action with human welfare. Delegates will talk about creating green jobs. They will also discuss expanding clean energy access. Finally, they will focus on protecting communities from floods, droughts, and heatwaves.

From Energy to Equity: The Big Issues on the Agenda

The COP30 agenda will combine broad policy debates with concrete solutions. Thematic days will highlight major sectors shaping the planet’s future.

COP30 themes
Source: Image from COP30 website

Energy and Industry: Countries will explore how to scale up renewable power and phase down fossil fuels. Fossil fuels still provide most global energy, so credible transition roadmaps are crucial.

Global renewable power capacity grew by a record 510 GW in 2024, with 520 GW expected in 2025, making up over 90% of new capacity. Total renewable capacity will reach nearly 5,800 GW by 2025. This will supply about 30% of the world’s electricity and aims for 42–45% by 2030. China leads, adding 260 GW in 2024, followed by steady growth in Europe, the US, and India. Solar dominates three-quarters of new installations worldwide.

Forests and Nature: The Amazon will take centre stage. Leaders will discuss how to end illegal deforestation, restore degraded land, and strengthen biodiversity protection.

Forests absorb 7.6 billion tonnes of CO₂ yearly but get less than 2% of climate finance. Global forest finance nearly doubled to $23.5 billion annually by 2024, with public funds covering 60% and private investment rising to 40%.

Despite growth, investments must quadruple by 2030 to meet global forest protection targets, with transparency and verified impact gaining importance.

Forest finance flows and investment needed

Agriculture and Food Systems: Food production and land use account for a large share of emissions. COP30 will promote sustainable farming, soil health, and waste reduction.

Cities and Infrastructure: With more people living in cities, resilient design matters. Delegates will discuss how to build low-carbon housing, transport, and water systems that can withstand climate impacts.

Health and Equity: Climate change affects people unequally. The summit will focus on adaptation, social justice, and the right to clean air, safe water, and energy.

Finance, Innovation, and Implementation: This may be the most critical theme. COP30 will urge countries to transform plans into real results. This will happen through improved monitoring, reporting, and financing. Adaptation finance, funding to help countries manage disasters, remains a top demand from vulnerable nations.

COP30’s message is clear: move from talking about climate to doing climate.

Belém’s Symbolism: The Rainforest at the Heart of Climate Talks

Belém, the capital of Pará State, is the gateway to the world’s largest rainforest. Hosting COP30 there ties climate, nature, and communities together.

Brazil wants to show leadership in nature-based climate solutions. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has pledged to end illegal deforestation by 2030 and restore degraded land. These actions are central to Brazil’s national climate goals and global emissions cuts.

The annual deforestation rate in the Amazon for the year 2025 was 5,796 km², down 11.08% from the previous period. It is the lowest rate in 11 years. This reduction reflects the resumption of plans to combat deforestation.

Belém’s choice is also about inclusion. Brazil’s COP30 presidency, led by diplomat André Corrêa do Lago, promises an open summit. It will involve governments, indigenous peoples, and local actors.

But the setting brings logistical challenges. Infrastructure, accommodation, and travel costs are major concerns. Some poorer nations and civil society groups fear limited access due to high expenses. Local authorities are upgrading transport and hotels, yet space will remain tight.

Despite these issues, hosting COP30 in the Amazon is a powerful symbol. It places environmental justice, indigenous leadership, and forest protection at the center of global debate.

André Aranha Correa do Lago, COP30 President Designate, stated in a letter:

“COP30 takes place at the epicentre of the climate crisis. Yet from rising waters and changing skies, a deeper strength is emerging – the determination of people to protect what they love. In Belém, let us honour that determination and transform it into a global agenda guided by care, not indifference; by interdependence, not individualism; by courage, not resignation. In Belém, where the rivers meet the sea, let us renew the alliance between humanity and nature – turning vulnerability into solidarity, cooperation into resilience, and adaptation into evolution. Changing by choice, together.”

What to Expect from COP30

Observers expect COP30 to produce several headline outcomes:

  • Stronger national climate pledges (NDCs), updating 2030 and 2035 targets for emissions cuts, adaptation, and nature-based projects.
  • A new global finance framework to provide predictable funding for developing countries and climate-vulnerable regions.
  • Amazon-focused partnerships, linking forest conservation, carbon markets, and indigenous stewardship.
  • Fossil-fuel transition roadmaps, outlining how nations will phase down coal, oil, and gas while ramping up renewables.
  • New monitoring systems to track real-world progress and link funding to measurable results.

These agreements will impact global climate policy for the next ten years. They will also shape investments in clean energy, nature restoration, and sustainable infrastructure.

The European Union’s Role at COP30

On 23 October 2025, the European Parliament adopted a resolution outlining its position ahead of COP30. Lawmakers called for strong action to limit warming to 1.5 °C, update climate plans, and deliver on finance pledges.

The EU resolution urges:

  • Tougher 2035 and 2040 targets for the EU’s own emissions reductions.
  • Economy-wide participation, requiring agriculture, transport, energy, and industry all to cut emissions.
  • More climate finance, especially for adaptation and loss-and-damage in poorer countries.
  • A just transition, protecting workers, communities, and ecosystems as economies shift to low-carbon models.

The EU delegation will attend COP30 in the second week of the summit. Its stance matters because Europe often shapes global climate negotiations. EU credibility depends on maintaining high ambition while helping others do the same.

Turning Promises into Progress: The World Watches Belém

COP30 in Belém is more than another climate meeting. It is a crossroads for global cooperation. The summit could change how we fight climate change. It links emission cuts to nature protection, social justice, and finance reform.

The Amazon setting reminds leaders that humanity’s future is tied to the planet’s ecosystems. Whether COP30 becomes a turning point will depend on concrete steps, not speeches.

If countries act boldly and inclusively, COP30 could move the world closer to the 1.5 °C path. If they delay again, the costs of inaction will keep rising. As the world gathers in Belém, one truth stands out: protecting nature and people must go hand in hand with reducing emissions. 

The post COP30 in Brazil Kicks Off: A Make-or-Break Moment for Global Climate Action appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business

Published

on

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) just rolled out a major revision to its Net-Zero Standard, Version 2.0. It changes how companies set climate targets, how much room they actually have to hit those targets, and how carbon credits fit into a credible net-zero strategy. Below, we break down what’s changing, when it takes effect, and why it matters even if your business isn’t formally an SBTi participant.

Key takeaways

  • SBTi is the default reference point for corporate climate action: 51% of Fortune Global 500 companies now hold net-zero targets, up from 8% in 2020, and over 11,000 organizations worldwide have SBTi-validated targets.
  • Net Zero Standard V2 redefines climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions, not reduction alone.
  • The new standard adds flexibility through five-year cycles, a “best efforts” standard, and an Asset Transition Method for companies whose path to net-zero doesn’t fit a straight-line trajectory.
  • Voluntary carbon credits are formally recognized for the first time, with reduction and removal credits accepted from 2027, and removals required from 2035.
  • Companies with 2030 targets keep using V1 for their current cycle and move to V2 in 2028; companies without targets can start using V2 on February 1, 2027.

Why every business needs to understand the SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) has become the default reference point for credible corporate climate action. Net-zero targets are now held by 51% of Fortune Global 500 (FG500) companies, up dramatically from just 8% in 2020, and more than 11,000 organizations worldwide have set SBTi-validated targets.

However, SBTi’s influence extends well beyond the companies formally participating in the program. Every business in the value chain of an SBTi participant will have to reduce its own carbon emissions, and businesses that aren’t SBTi participants themselves still look to the program for guidance on climate action.

In short, SBTi gives every business a credible blueprint for climate action, and companies that follow its principles can pursue climate action with confidence, whether or not they’re formally part of the program.

How will the Net Zero Standard revision affect business climate action?

SBTi participation is expected to grow. Despite strong target-setting participation among the F500, only 17% of companies use the SBTi Net Zero Standard V1 beyond target setting, largely because its rules have been seen as too rigid to apply in practice. Much of the Net Zero Standard revision has focused on creating more flexibility to enable higher participation. Medium and small businesses will also increasingly feel pressure for climate action, since SBTi mandates that its participants reduce carbon emissions across their value chains.

Net Zero Standard V2 also redefines climate leadership: leading climate action now means reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. Reducing your own emissions while ignoring the emissions you continue to release along the way is no longer considered leadership. Supporting voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits is now backed by the leading authority on corporate climate action.

What lessons shaped the Net Zero Standard V2 revision?

The revision reflects a few learnings about what actually drives climate progress, and how SBTi built those lessons into the new standard.

Net Zero Standard V1 Learnings Net Zero Standard V2 Implementation
Making real short-term progress is more important and more difficult than making big long-term promises Focus on short-term climate progress
Every company has a different path to net zero that doesn’t always fit generalized net-zero rules Create asset transition plans based on each company’s unique asset lifecycles and capital planning
We need to mitigate our ongoing emissions to keep global carbon emissions in check Reduce global carbon emissions by financing voluntary carbon projects with high-integrity carbon credits

What are the key changes between the old and new Net Zero Standard?

Both versions of the standard are grounded in net-zero by 2050. However, the old standard treated climate leadership as simply reducing emissions, expected a long-term commitment to net zero, based emission reduction targets on generalized net-zero goals, revoked status from companies that fell behind on targets, and ignored voluntary carbon projects entirely.

The new standard treats climate leadership as reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions. It shifts the focus to short-term progress through five-year cycles, and it bases emission reduction targets on both the net-zero goal and a company’s own asset decarbonization plan. A new Asset Transition Method lets companies set decarbonization targets through asset plans with committed, verifiable steps; an ambitious but achievable path based on a company’s starting point, financial resources, and technology, with multiple pathways to reflect the unique opportunities and constraints of different industries and companies.

Crucially, the new standard moves to a “best efforts” basis that creates real flexibility on progress against targets. Businesses that miss their targets can keep their status if they’ve used “every lever” within their control, and minimum progress rules will be set out in the SBTi Assurance Manual.

Finally, the new standard formally uses voluntary carbon projects to mitigate ongoing emissions. From 2027 through 2034, this mitigation is recognized, and both carbon reduction and removal credits are accepted. From 2035 forward, mitigation with carbon removal credits becomes required, with durability matching between the removal and the emission it offsets.

Old Net Zero Standard New Net Zero Standard
Grounded in net-zero by 2050 Grounded in net-zero by 2050
Climate leadership is reducing emissions Climate leadership is reducing emissions and mitigating ongoing emissions
Make a long-term commitment to net-zero Focus on short-term progress in 5-year cycles
Emission reduction targets are based on net-zero goal
  • Emission reduction targets are based on net-zero goal and asset decarbonization plan
  • Adds SBTi’s Asset Transition Method
  • Decarbonization targets are set through asset plans with committed, verifiable steps
  • Ambitious but achievable path based on starting point, financial resources, technology
  • Multiple pathways for unique opportunities and constraints of industries and companies
Businesses who fall behind targets lose status
  • “Best efforts” basis creates flexibility on progress to targets
  • Businesses that miss targets can keep status if they used “every lever” in their control
  • Minimum progress rules will be provided in the SBTi Assurance Manual
Ignores voluntary carbon projects
  • Uses voluntary carbon projects to mitigate ongoing emissions
  • 2027–2034: Mitigation is recognized. Carbon reduction and removal credits are accepted.
  • 2035 forward: Mitigation with carbon removal credits is required, with durability matching.

When does the new Net Zero Standard take effect?

Companies with existing 2030 targets should continue using the old Net Zero Standard for their current cycle, and start using the new Net Zero Standard in 2028 to set targets for the next cycle (2030–2035).

Companies that don’t yet have targets can use the new Net Zero Standard starting February 1, 2027.

What are SBTi’s Category A and Category B companies?

The new Net Zero Standard splits companies into two categories, with different requirements attached to each.

Category A covers large companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from high-income countries. A company from any country qualifies if it meets at least one of: net turnover of €450 million or more, or 1,000 or more full-time employees. A company from a high-income country qualifies if its Scope 1 and 2 emissions are 10,000 tCO2e or more, or if it meets at least two of: balance sheet of €25 million or more, net turnover of €50 million or more, or 250 or more full-time employees.

Category B covers small companies from all countries and medium-sized companies from lower-income countries.

How do Scope 1 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?

Scope 1 targets aim to transition companies to net-zero direct emissions by 2050 or sooner, and companies can choose from three approaches.

  1. Absolute emissions reduction follows a straight-line emissions trajectory from the target base year to the net-zero year.
  2. Emissions intensity reduction lets companies follow sector-specific pathways designed to reflect the reduction opportunities available in sectors like steel, cement, or chemicals.
  3. Asset transition is designed for companies whose capital stock turnover doesn’t follow a linear or sector pathway. These companies design a transition plan to operate existing assets efficiently and replace them with low-carbon assets, using predetermined milestones.

How do Scope 2 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?

Scope 2 targets address emissions from purchased electricity through three pathways:

  1. Reducing electricity consumption,
  2. Reducing grid consumption by installing onsite or direct-line offsite clean energy generation, and
  3. Cleaning up the regional grid using market-based tools like PPAs, RECs, and GOs that drive clean energy development.

V2 introduces a dual Scope 2 framework requiring two separate targets, with an overall goal of 100% low-carbon electricity by 2040.

The location-based target addresses the carbon intensity of a company’s physical power use, and requires companies to show that their grid consumption is falling and/or that their physical grid use is getting cleaner; in other words, that their market-based solutions are actually making the grid cleaner.

The market-based (or zero-carbon electricity) target tracks a company’s use of low-carbon power generation contracts and Energy Attribute Certificates. It requires geographical matching of these certificates with electricity consumption based on deliverability regions (grid regions); annual matching is allowed, though hourly matching is encouraged. Category A companies with large electricity loads must report the percentage of their Scope 2 electricity consumption matched with low-carbon attributes on an hourly basis, and there’s an optional recognition framework for companies that meet hourly matching thresholds.

How do Scope 3 targets work under Net Zero Standard V2?

Scope 3 targets share the same 2050-or-sooner net-zero goal, but companies set near-term targets only for material emissions sources in their value chain and areas where they have real influence. Long-term Scope 3 targets are generally not required.

Limited, justified exclusions are allowed for near-term targets, including categories that individually account for less than 5% of total Scope 3 emissions, and activities where a company lacks practical influence, like leased assets it doesn’t operationally control, or the processing of sold products. Optional exclusions are also available in specific categories.

Companies can choose from three approaches to near-term Scope 3 targets:

  1. An overarching emissions reduction target, which follows a linear contraction of emissions from the base year to residual emissions of 10% or less by 2050 or sooner;
  2. An overarching supplier/customer alignment target, benchmarked against a growing share of tier 1 suppliers and customers reaching net-zero by 2050 or sooner; or
  3. A category- or activity-specific target, tailored for companies with concentrated emissions in particular Scope 3 categories or high-emitting activities.

What is “ongoing emissions mitigation” under the new SBTi standard?

This is one of the most significant additions in Net Zero Standard V2. Accelerated climate contributions are needed to help the world achieve climate objectives, limit temperature overshoot, mitigate transition risks, and support the scale-up of climate solutions, and V2 formally recognizes that. Ongoing emissions mitigation runs as a parallel track to companies also reducing their own emissions.

The framework is initially voluntary, with recognition available at three contribution levels to encourage early action.

  1. Engaged companies address more than 1% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions.
  2. Advanced companies address more than 10% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, including 100% of Scope 1 and 2 emissions.
  3. Leadership companies address 100% of total Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions with a contribution budget of $80/tCO2e.

Carbon credits used for this purpose have to meet certain quality standards. They must be ex-post (issued after the mitigation has actually occurred), independently third-party-assured, emissions reductions or removals, measured in tCO2e, that occur within five years prior to the reporting year. They must be sourced from outside the company’s own value chain. Further minimum criteria will be set to align with high-integrity frameworks, with additional details on the recognition program expected in the second half of 2026.

Starting in 2035, carbon removals become mandatory for Category A companies. From that point, the carbon removal coverage requirement rises linearly from 1% of Scope 1–3 emissions to 100% by a company’s net-zero year. Within that, 10% of long-lived GHG emissions must specifically be covered by durable removals, also rising linearly to 100% by the net-zero year.

How must companies neutralize residual emissions?

At a company’s net-zero target year and thereafter, it must reduce its Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions to zero or to residual levels, and neutralize all residual emissions using eligible carbon removals. Those removals have to meet two conditions: they must occur within the same reporting period as the residual emissions they’re neutralizing, and long-lived GHGs must be neutralized with long-lived removals, matching the durability of the removal to the atmospheric lifetime of the emission being addressed.

What is the SBTi implementation hierarchy?

Net Zero Standard V2 also lays out how companies should prioritize their actions for credible target delivery, in three tiers.

  1. Direct actions, at the activity level, are actions that reduce emissions at the source within a company’s own operations and value chain; things like efficiency improvements, fuel switching, and engaging suppliers and customers to reduce their emissions.
  2. Actions within shared systems, or activity pools that reduce the emissions of shared systems like electricity or gas grids. This includes market instruments that convey low-carbon attributes, such as PPAs, RECs, and GOs, all of which must meet minimum integrity criteria that SBTi will elaborate on in future guidance.
  3. Sector-level actions relate to the same type of activity occurring in a relevant geography or system, in a way that meaningfully reduces the emissions a company is responsible for.

How Terrapass helps businesses meet the new SBTi standard

As the rules around carbon credits become more rigorous, the quality of the credits behind them matters more than ever. Terrapass has expanded our global network of carbon projects: more project types, locations, prices, ICVCM CCPs, and UN SDGs, spanning super-pollutant destruction, nature-based solutions, and durable removals. We offer Green-e® Climate Certification and we only source from third-party-verified projects on ICVCM-Eligible registries.

We also help clients with impact beyond carbon: EACs, RECs, and GOs including Green-e® Certified credits that support leading renewable energy projects; water credits that support water restoration projects; and custom environmental product needs like RNG and SAF. Wherever your organization is on its sustainability journey, we help clients around the world address climate risk, advance their environmental and social goals, and get the most out of their sustainability budgets.

FAQ: SBTi Net-Zero Standard revision

What is the SBTi Net-Zero Standard?

It’s the framework the Science Based Targets initiative publishes for companies that want validated, credible net-zero targets tied to limiting global warming.

What is changing in the SBTi Net Zero Standard V2 revision?

The biggest changes are more flexibility (five-year cycles and a “best efforts” standard), a new Asset Transition Method for companies whose emissions don’t follow a straight-line path, and formal recognition of voluntary carbon credits for mitigating ongoing emissions.

When do companies need to switch to the new SBTi standard?

If your company already has 2030 targets, you keep using V1 for your current cycle and move to V2 in 2028. If you don’t have targets yet, you can start using V2 as of February 1, 2027.

Can companies use carbon credits to meet SBTi targets?

They can. Under V2, high-integrity carbon reduction and removal credits count toward mitigating ongoing emissions from 2027 through 2034. Starting in 2035, only removal credits count, and they need to be durability-matched to the emissions they offset.

What’s the difference between Category A and Category B companies under SBTi?

Category A is large companies everywhere plus medium-sized companies in high-income countries, based on thresholds like revenue, headcount, or emissions. Category B is small companies everywhere and medium-sized companies in lower-income countries.

What happens if a company misses its SBTi target?

Under the old standard, falling behind could cost a company its SBTi status. Under V2’s “best efforts” approach, a company can hold onto its status as long as it’s used every lever within its control, with minimum progress rules coming in the SBTi Assurance Manual.

Sources: This post is based on Terrapass’s internal analysis of the SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0. Facts and figures were checked against SBTi’s official V2.0 announcement, SBTi’s Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2.0 — Chapter 6: Ongoing Emissions Responsibility, Trellis’s coverage of the standard, Trellis’s reporting on Ongoing Emissions Recognition costs, Sylvera’s analysis of what comes next, Anthesis Group’s Fortune 500 net-zero commitments research, and Climate Impact Partners’ seventh annual FG500 analysis, as reported by CarbonUnits.com.

The post SBTi Net-Zero Standard V2: What the Revision Means for Every Business appeared first on Terrapass.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

How to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD

Published

on

For most businesses, the emissions that matter most sit outside their own walls. Scope 3 emissions, everything generated across your value chain, from the suppliers who make your inputs to the customers who use your products, typically make up the majority of a company’s total carbon footprint. Under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), those value-chain emissions now have to be measured and disclosed with a rigour that spend-based estimates alone struggle to satisfy. This guide sets out how to improve Scope 3 data accuracy for CSRD: the calculation methods open to you, how to move from estimates to verified supplier data, and how to govern that data so it holds up to audit.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

How community stewardship makes carbon credits durable

Published

on

A carbon credit is a commitment that extends well into the future. The tonne of CO₂ compensated for today from a nature-based carbon project must remain out of the atmosphere for good, which means the forest behind the credit has to remain standing long after the transaction is complete. For any buyer, this raises a defining question: What ensures that the forest endures?

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com