Amid tensions in the West over cuts to development funding and souring US relationships with its allies, Brazil’s COP30 president, André Aranha Corrêa do Lago, defended multilateralism and the legacy of UN climate talks in his first address as chief of this year’s climate summit.
On Wednesday, Corrêa do Lago told a plenary meeting at UN headquarters in New York he hopes Brazil can provide a “decisive impulse” in protecting the “institutional legacy we built together over three decades”, as well as accelerating implementation of the Paris Agreement to tackle climate change.
“Brazil has the firm conviction that there is no future progress for humanity without deep, rapid and sustained cooperation among all countries,” said the veteran Brazilian diplomat, who also highlighted the outcomes of the previous two COPs.
His comments hold significance as climate-change sceptic US President Donald Trump has kick-started the process to pull the US out of the global climate accord it adopted in 2015, backed the expansion of fossil fuel production on American soil, and refused to deliver promised climate finance.
On Thursday, the EU’s climate information service Copernicus said February 2025 was the third-warmest February globally, with the average temperature reaching 1.59 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial times, and the extent of sea ice in both polar regions falling to a new all-time minimum that month.
But despite Corrêa do Lago’s appeal for international unity in New York, longstanding grievances on climate aid emerged as countries outlined their negotiating positions. In a statement read by Iraq, the G77 group representing all developing countries called on wealthy nations to deliver more funding.
“The developing countries’ expectations were not met (at COP29),” Iraqi ambassador Abbas Kadhim Obaid told the UN plenary. “COP29 failed to deliver the crucial support essential for developing countries to achieve a just transition towards low-carbon development pathways, or to prepare and adapt to the devastating impact of climate change.”
At last year’s COP29 in Azerbaijan, rich nations agreed to channel at least $300 billion a year by 2035 to ramp up climate action in vulnerable countries as part of a new finance goal, after bad-tempered talks whose outcome was criticised as inadequate by developing states and activists alike.
At the UN this week, those divisions remained stark, with Australia and the European Union downplaying the role of government climate funding and instead calling for a bigger contribution from private finance.
“Let’s be honest. The needs for climate-related investment are so vast that they can never be met solely by the provision of public finance and mobilisation of finance through public interventions. A strong enabling environment for investment is not optional – it’s essential,” said the EU’s representative.
In November, countries will gather in the city of Belém, in Brazil’s Amazon region, to finalise a roadmap intended to help mobilise a larger sum of $1.3 trillion a year by 2035 from all available sources. Governments are also expected to unveil their new nationally determined contributions (NDCs) by September, outlining targets and plans to cut planet-heating emissions by the same year.
Fossil-fuel transition pledge
At COP28 in Dubai, countries reached a landmark decision to transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems, based on the first Global Stocktake (GST) of climate policies under the Paris pact. Corrêa do Lago highlighted this decision as one of the main outcomes from past climate negotiations.
But there has since been little reaffirmation of that pledge nor any concrete indication of how countries will put it into practice. References to it were removed from both a COP16 biodiversity deal in Cali last year and final decisions at COP29 in Baku, after Saudi Arabia said it would not accept text that mentioned fossil fuels. The climate summit ended with no outcome on stepping up emissions cuts.
This week’s UN meeting heard renewed calls for greater ambition at COP30. “The world expects real progress on transitioning away from fossil fuels at COP30,” the EU’s delegate said. “We simply cannot afford to have two COPs without an outcome on mitigation.”

COP30 President Corrêa do Lago did not explicitly call out fossil fuels, but did mention that the Global Stocktake – the process that led to the COP28 fossil fuel transition pledge – is “the unanimous reference that informs international cooperation”, adding “the GST stands as our guide to Mission 1.5”.
Brazil’s leadership on climate action has been questioned as President Lula da Silva has made a strong push to begin oil drilling in the mouth of the Amazon river, even seeking expedited approval for projects.
Lula’s government pushes for new oil drilling in the Amazon – where it will host COP30
In New York, as the EU pushed for more ambitious emissions reductions, the Africa Group, India and China said developing countries should be given flexibility. India’s UN ambassador Parvathaneni Harish said efforts to move away from the principle that industrialised nations bear the biggest burden would “risk undermining the trust and cooperation necessary for global action”.
“We advocate for solutions that combine the development of renewable energy with the sustainable use of our natural resources, avoiding restrictions that could hinder economic growth and energy access for millions of Africans,” said Angolan UN ambassador José da Cruz.
China, the world’s biggest emitter, urged developed countries to ramp up the pace on their climate goals. “[They] should show greater ambition and take actions in fulfilling the obligations of taking the lead by reducing emissions and achieving carbon neutrality ahead of schedule,” said the Chinese delegate.
Countries are due to deliver their NDCs ahead of COP30, with Brazil, the US and Japan among the few to have submitted theirs already. At the UN plenary, some big emitters like the EU, Australia and Mexico said they were working to deliver their plans on time, while China and India did not mention theirs.
Countries fail again to decide timing of key IPCC climate science reports
Can Amazon COP cope?
The UN climate process began in Brazil over three decades ago, with the adoption of the Rio Conventions. Now, countries return to the South American nation at a crucial moment of climate extremes, a disengaged United States and urgent calls to boost ambition in climate policies as the world heats up.
The annual UN climate summit will be hosted for the first time in the Amazon rainforest, in the northern city of Belém. There are concerns over whether the city of 1.3 million people can provide for tens of thousands of conference delegates. At the UN this week, at least three delegations queried the conditions for accommodation and transport.
Corrêa do Lago said Brazil is working to improve infrastructure in Belém. The government has announced a plan to add 26,000 new beds by renovating hotels, rental homes, river cruise boats and even military facilities and schools.
“We agree that Belém is not a city that was designed for this kind of event. It is a medium-sized city in Brazil,” said the COP30 president. “But President Lula is convinced that the symbolism of hosting a conference in the Amazon is significantly more important than the challenges that can be found in its organisation.”
The post COP30 chief calls for global unity on climate action as cooperation falters appeared first on Climate Home News.
COP30 chief calls for global unity on climate action as cooperation falters
Climate Change
Greenpeace organisations to appeal USD $345 million court judgment in Energy Transfer’s intimidation lawsuit
SYDNEY, Saturday 28 February 2026 — Greenpeace International and Greenpeace organisations in the US announce they will seek a new trial and, if necessary, appeal the decision with the North Dakota Supreme Court following a North Dakota District Court judgment today awarding Energy Transfer (ET) USD $345 million.

ET’s SLAPP suit remains a blatant attempt to silence free speech, erase Indigenous leadership of the Standing Rock movement, and punish solidarity with peaceful resistance to the Dakota Access Pipeline. Greenpeace International will also continue to seek damages for ET’s bullying lawsuits under EU anti-SLAPP legislation in the Netherlands.
Mads Christensen, Greenpeace International Executive Director said: “Energy Transfer’s attempts to silence us are failing. Greenpeace International will continue to resist intimidation tactics. We will not be silenced. We will only get louder, joining our voices to those of our allies all around the world against the corporate polluters and billionaire oligarchs who prioritise profits over people and the planet.
“With hard-won freedoms under threat and the climate crisis accelerating, the stakes of this legal fight couldn’t be higher. Through appeals in the US and Greenpeace International’s groundbreaking anti-SLAPP case in the Netherlands, we are exploring every option to hold Energy Transfer accountable for multiple abusive lawsuits and show all power-hungry bullies that their attacks will only result in a stronger people-powered movement.”
The Court’s final judgment today rejects some of the jury verdict delivered in March 2025, but still awards hundreds of millions of dollars to ET without a sound basis in law. The Greenpeace defendants will continue to press their arguments that the US Constitution does not allow liability here, that ET did not present evidence to support its claims, that the Court admitted inflammatory and irrelevant evidence at trial and excluded other evidence supporting the defense, and that the jury pool in Mandan could not be impartial.[1][2]
ET’s back-to-back lawsuits against Greenpeace International and the US organisations Greenpeace USA (Greenpeace Inc.) and Greenpeace Fund are clear-cut examples of SLAPPs — lawsuits attempting to bury nonprofits and activists in legal fees, push them towards bankruptcy and ultimately silence dissent.[3] Greenpeace International, which is based in the Netherlands, is pursuing justice in Europe, with a suit against ET under Dutch law and the European Union’s new anti-SLAPP directive, a landmark test of the new legislation which could help set a powerful precedent against corporate bullying.[4]
Kate Smolski, Program Director at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: “This is part of a worrying trend globally: fossil fuel corporations are increasingly using litigation to attack and silence ordinary people and groups using the law to challenge their polluting operations — and we’re not immune to these tactics here in Australia.
“Rulings like this have a chilling effect on democracy and public interest litigation — we must unite against these silencing tactics as bad for Australians and bad for our democracy. Our movement is stronger than any corporate bully, and grows even stronger when under attack.”
Energy Transfer’s SLAPPs are part of a wave of abusive lawsuits filed by Big Oil companies like Shell, Total, and ENI against Greenpeace entities in recent years.[3] A couple of these cases have been successfully stopped in their tracks. This includes Greenpeace France successfully defeating TotalEnergies’ SLAPP on 28 March 2024, and Greenpeace UK and Greenpeace International forcing Shell to back down from its SLAPP on 10 December 2024.
-ENDS-
Images available in Greenpeace Media Library
Notes:
[1] The judgment entered by North Dakota District Court Judge Gion follows a jury verdict finding Greenpeace entities liable for more than US$660 million on March 19, 2025. Judge Gion subsequently threw out several items from the jury’s verdict, reducing the total damages to approximately US$345 million.
[2] Public statements from the independent Trial Monitoring Committee
[3] Energy Transfer’s first lawsuit was filed in federal court in 2017 under the RICO Act – the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, a US federal statute designed to prosecute mob activity. The case was dismissed in 2019, with the judge stating the evidence fell “far short” of what was needed to establish a RICO enterprise. The federal court did not decide on Energy Transfer’s claims based on state law, so Energy Transfer promptly filed a new case in a North Dakota state court with these and other state law claims.
[4] Greenpeace International sent a Notice of Liability to Energy Transfer on 23 July 2024, informing the pipeline giant of Greenpeace International’s intention to bring an anti-SLAPP lawsuit against the company in a Dutch Court. After Energy Transfer declined to accept liability on multiple occasions (September 2024, December 2024), Greenpeace International initiated the first test of the European Union’s anti-SLAPP Directive on 11 February 2025 by filing a lawsuit in Dutch court against Energy Transfer. The case was officially registered in the docket of the Court of Amsterdam on 2 July, 2025. Greenpeace International seeks to recover all damages and costs it has suffered as a result of Energy Transfers’s back-to-back, abusive lawsuits demanding hundreds of millions of dollars from Greenpeace International and the Greenpeace organisations in the US. The next hearing in the Court of Amsterdam is scheduled for 16 April, 2026.
Media contact:
Kate O’Callaghan on 0406 231 892 or kate.ocallaghan@greenpeace.org
Climate Change
Former EPA Staff Detail Expanding Pollution Risks Under Trump
The Trump administration’s relentless rollback of public health and environmental protections has allowed widespread toxic exposures to flourish, warn experts who helped implement safeguards now under assault.
In a new report that outlines a dozen high-risk pollutants given new life thanks to weakened, delayed or rescinded regulations, the Environmental Protection Network, a nonprofit, nonpartisan group of hundreds of former Environmental Protection Agency staff, warns that the EPA under President Donald Trump has abandoned the agency’s core mission of protecting people and the environment from preventable toxic exposures.
Former EPA Staff Detail Expanding Pollution Risks Under Trump
Climate Change
Cheniere Energy Received $370 Million IRS Windfall for Using LNG as ‘Alternative’ Fuel
The country’s largest exporter of liquefied natural gas benefited from what critics say is a questionable IRS interpretation of tax credits.
Cheniere Energy, the largest producer and exporter of U.S. liquefied natural gas, received $370 million from the IRS in the first quarter of 2026, a payout that shipping experts, tax specialists and a U.S. senator say the company never should have received.
Cheniere Energy Received $370 Million IRS Windfall for Using LNG as ‘Alternative’ Fuel
-
Greenhouse Gases7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Spanish-language misinformation on renewable energy spreads online, report shows
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
