Connect with us

Published

on

So, we touched down in Baku! After a full day of travel and getting acclimated, we have begun to prepare for the 29th Conference of Parties (COP29).

This is my fourth COP, and I have many thoughts and things to attend to, and yet I still don’t know much about what each day will look like for me just yet. It took me two of these conferences to figure out what it is I’m doing here and why, and three to figure out how I can do these things well and care for myself and others around me.

I get to serve in the role as a house mother for the second year in a row with the Climate Generation delegation, and I am honored to be able to share what I know about this confusing, exciting, disheartening, invigorating, ridiculous, massive conference. I am excited to participate with folks who are experiencing it for the first time. To me, this means that part of my role is to make the house feel like home however I may and however folks need, offering an ear to vent to or get some questions answered from one of the various coalition spaces that I am in, and that, wherever I may, I should be connecting these brilliant folks with the global movement for climate justice.

As many may know, I am the Director of Youth N’Power and the Youth N’Power Network, a year-round, apprenticeship-modeled program for youth in Minneapolis and a network of young folks that are learning and/or working on becoming community organizers that operate through the lens of Environmental Justice. In another capacity, I am the Environmental Justice Youth Program Director and Global Climate Justice Coordinator with MN Interfaith Power & Light. I also get the pleasure of holding space in the U.S. Fair Shares Collaborative and national Climate Reparations Camp. To be at the crux of these spaces where environment, relationships, and just transition intersect is both a challenge and a blessing.

I have 10 apprentices in Minneapolis and 3 nationally, and this year, the second of my apprentices, Manny, is attending COP29 with our delegation. Now that I am starting to see connections between local and global movements, having some of the youth that I get to spend time with and mentor also learn to navigate this space feels really cool. And, it makes it clear how much is at stake and just how far behind our country is as it relates to the global movement to move towards a just future.

The UNFCCC and the Conference of Parties can certainly be a nightmare. And, it can also be a place where you make lifelong friends, understand how folks are actualizing real solutions to overlapping crises (in addition to climate), and build a much-needed global community.

I know in my spirit that building global community is the primary solution to these crises, because while we may be at a climate conference, the United Nations does not hold the solutions to what people and the planet experience.

Community holds the solutions. Community holds the solutions. Community holds the solutions. I say that as many times as I can, so that it becomes a concept that most people, especially Americans, understand. We have been led to believe that we must do individual action only in order to make practical change, and yet, we are at a conference where the COP29 host president in Azerbaijan has set up active deals to further fossil fuel production before day one even commences.

I find myself wondering to what end we are supposed to organize towards while these oil tycoons and governments continue making deals that line their pockets and further rocket us towards our own demise. This is the stuff of nightmares. And yet, we persist?

Today, on the day before the conference begins, Manny and I attended two meetings for coalition spaces: CAN-I (Climate Action Network International) and DCJ (The Global Campaign to Demand Climate Justice) members’ assembly. There were a few takeaways that I will be watching out for as the conference begins: CAN’s Fossil of the Day award — one of their major advocacy tools that call our UNFCCC parties (countries) blocking climate action and progress in negotiations based on the Network’s strategies and priorities. This is awarded to countries that are “doing their best at being the worst.” I know that the United States usually wins the award, and this adds to my personal shame about representing the country that is the highest historical emitter of Greenhouse Gases and the largest producer of Fossil Fuels, in the conference.

We also learned of a number of planned actions in support of and solidarity with Palestine, calling for an end to the genocide (and all genocides happening globally at present). Any action within the COP space must be sanctioned by the U.N., and it is imperative that anyone reading this understands that genocide is very much so an environmental and climate issue.

Knowing that some of the largest Environmental NGOs are standing in solidarity with oppressed and marginalized peoples and places reminds me why I do this work.

The second meeting we attended was for DCJ. We also talked through strategy, and the schedule of events for Palestine and other justice-focused initiatives. One of the scariest things i heard today, before the conference even begun, is that while we may be talking about staying below a 1.5 global average annual temperature increase, in actuality, we are looking at a 2 degree average increase by 2040 at the latest, and 3 degrees by the end of the century. That means that a child born today could live in a world that is unlivable, and the actions of our governments and these corporations are accelerating a future with an earth that can’t support life as we know it, or the lack of any future altogether.

The last thing I’ll add as we go into this COP is that it is a climate finance year. In order to ensure that we have some hope for a future for all generations, peoples, and planet, the Global North needs to pay its Fair Share of climate finance to the Global South. That figure is something to the tune of $5 Trillion per year. For the U.S., our Fair Share is 46% of that, or 446 Billion Dollars, annually. 

This figure is one that has grown as polluting countries have continued to pollute and destroy all of existence, and the Global South calls for us to begin the process of reparation. The narratives surrounding reparations have been debated for too long, and while year after year and conference after conference, we somehow never can find the money to do so, our nation somehow finds the money to send so that atrocious harms can continue. 

This reality is one that most Americans refuse to understand, acknowledge, or talk about, and so in my fourth go-around, I hear the same two questions rising to the surface: Is the Global North going to pay its Fair Share and repair harm? For the Global South is paying from their own pockets and with their lives and livelihoods, and we still treat the climate crisis as a conversation for activists only, where I come from. Will we be able to see a future for the next seven generations, or will we fail time and again, to change our understanding of what needs to happen in the present? These are my thoughts as I go forth into Day 1 of Week 1, of a conference that has happened every year of my life since my birth, and still hasn’t figured out how to fix these issues.

Analyah is a Climate Generation Window Into COP delegate for COP29. To learn more, we encourage you to meet the full delegation, support our delegates, and subscribe to the Window Into COP digest.

Analyah Schlaeger dos Santos

Analyah Schlaeger dos Santos is a young Afro-Brazilian-American woman born and raised in North Minneapolis, Minnesota. After living in Atlanta, Georgia, she moved back to Minneapolis in 2015 to study Global Relations and Environmental Justice at the University of Minnesota and the Higher Education Consortium for Urban Affairs. She has been an aquatic guide to all ages for 12 years and counting and loves to infuse environmental wellness into her frameworks.

She is currently the International Campaign lead at MN Interfaith Power & Light, and serves on the board of multiple local organizations.

The post Context, Priorities, and Plans for COP29 appeared first on Climate Generation.

Context, Priorities, and Plans for COP29

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Big fishing nations secure last-minute seat to write rules on deep sea conservation

Published

on

As a treaty to protect the High Seas entered into force this month with backing from more than 80 countries, major fishing nations China, Japan and Brazil secured a last-minute seat at the table to negotiate the procedural rules, funding and other key issues ahead of the treaty’s first COP.

The Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ) pact – known as the High Seas Treaty – was agreed in 2023. It is seen as key to achieving a global goal to protect at least 30% of the planet’s ecosystems by 2030, as it lays the legal foundation for creating international marine protected areas (MPAs) in the deep ocean. The high seas encompass two-thirds of the world’s ocean.

Last September, the treaty reached the key threshold of 60 national ratifications needed for it to enter into force – a number that has kept growing and currently stands at 83. In total, 145 countries have signed the pact, which indicates their intention to ratify it. The treaty formally took effect on January 17.

    “In a world of accelerating crises – climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution – the agreement fills a critical governance gap to secure a resilient and productive ocean for all,” UN Secretary-General António Guterres said in a statement.

    Julio Cordano, Chile’s director of environment, climate change and oceans, said the treaty is “one of the most important victories of our time”. He added that the Nazca and Salas y Gómez ridge – off the coast of South America in the Pacific – could be one of the first intact biodiversity hotspots to gain protection.

    Scientists have warned the ocean is losing its capacity to act as a carbon sink, as emissions and global temperatures rise. Currently, the ocean traps around 90% of the excess planetary heat building up from global warming. Marine protected areas could become a tool to restore “blue carbon sinks”, by boosting carbon absorption in the seafloor and protecting carbon-trapping organisms such as microalgae.

    Last-minute ratifications

    Countries that have ratified the BBNJ will now be bound by some of its rules, including a key provision requiring countries to carry out environmental impact assessments (EIA) for activities that could have an impact on the deep ocean’s biodiversity, such as fisheries.

    Activities that affect the ocean floor, such as deep-sea mining, will still fall under the jurisdiction of the International Seabed Authority (ISA).

    Nations are still negotiating the rules of the BBNJ’s other provisions, including creating new MPAs and sharing genetic resources from biodiversity in the deep ocean. They will meet in one last negotiating session in late March, ahead of the treaty’s first COP (conference of the parties) set to take place in late 2026 or early 2027.

    China and Japan – which are major fishing nations that operate in deep waters – ratified the BBNJ in December 2025, just as the treaty was about to enter into force. Other top fishing nations on the high seas like South Korea and Spain had already ratified the BBNJ last year.

    Power play: Can a defensive Europe stick with decarbonisation in Davos?

    Tom Pickerell, ocean programme director at the World Resources Institute (WRI), said that while the last-minute ratifications from China, Japan and Brazil were not required for the treaty’s entry into force, they were about high-seas players ensuring they have a “seat at the table”.

    “As major fishing nations and geopolitical powers, these countries recognise that upcoming BBNJ COP negotiations will shape rules affecting critical commercial sectors – from shipping and fisheries to biotechnology – and influence how governments engage with the treaty going forward,” Pickerell told Climate Home News.

    Some major Western countries – including the US, Canada, Germany and the UK – have yet to ratify the treaty and unless they do, they will be left out of drafting its procedural rules. A group of 18 environmental groups urged the UK government to ratify it quickly, saying it would be a “failure of leadership” to miss the BBNJ’s first COP.

    Finalising the rules

    Countries will meet from March 23 to April 2 for the treaty’s last “preparatory commission” (PrepCom) session in New York, which is set to draft a proposal for the treaty’s procedural rules, among them on funding processes and where the secretariat will be hosted – with current offers coming from China in the city of Xiamen, Chile’s Valparaiso and Brussels in Belgium.

    Janine Felson, a diplomat from Belize and co-chair of the “PrepCom”, told journalists in an online briefing “we’re now at a critical stage” because, with the treaty having entered into force, the preparatory commission is “pretty much a definitive moment for the agreement”.

    Felson said countries will meet to “tidy up those rules that are necessary for the conference of the parties to convene” and for states to begin implementation. The first COP will adopt the rules of engagement.

    She noted there are “some contentious issues” on whether the BBNJ should follow the structure of other international treaties such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), as well as differing opinions on how prescriptive its procedures should be.

    “While there is this tension on how far can we be held to precedent, there is also recognition that this BBNJ agreement has quite a bit to contribute in enhancing global ocean governance,” she added.

    The post Big fishing nations secure last-minute seat to write rules on deep sea conservation appeared first on Climate Home News.

    Big fishing nations secure last-minute seat to write rules on deep sea conservation

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    Climate at Davos: Energy security in the geopolitical driving seat 

    Published

    on

    The annual World Economic Forum got underway on Tuesday in the Swiss ski resort of Davos, providing a snowy stage for government and business leaders to opine on international affairs. With attention focused on the latest crisis – a potential US-European trade war over Greenland – climate change has slid down the agenda.

    Despite this, a number of panels are addressing issues like electric vehicles, energy security and climate science. Keep up with top takeaways from those discussions and other climate news from Davos in our bulletin, which we’ll update throughout the day.

    From oil to electrons – energy security enters a new era

    Energy crises spurred by geopolitical tensions are nothing new – remember the 1970s oil shock spurred by the embargo Arab producers slapped on countries that had supported Israel during the Yom Kippur War, leading to rocketing inflation and huge economic pain.

    But, a Davos panel on energy security heard, the situation has since changed. Oil now accounts for less than 30% of the world’s energy supply, down from more than 50% in 1973. This shift, combined with a supply glut, means oil is taking more of a back seat, according to International Energy Agency boss Fatih Birol.

    Instead, in an “age of electricity” driven by transport and technology, energy diplomacy is more focused on key elements of that supply chain, in the form of critical minerals, natural gas and the security buffer renewables can provide. That requires new thinking, Birol added.

    “Energy and geopolitics were always interwoven but I have never ever seen that the energy security risks are so multiplied,” he said. “Energy security, in my view, should be elevated to the level of national security today.”

    In this context, he noted how many countries are now seeking to generate their own energy as far as possible, including from nuclear and renewables, and when doing energy deals, they are considering not only costs but also whether they can rely on partners in the long-term.

      In the case of Europe – which saw energy prices jump after sanctions on Russian gas imports in the wake of Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine – energy security rooted in homegrown supply is a top priority, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in Davos on Tuesday.

      Outlining the bloc’s “affordable energy action plan” in a keynote speech at the World Economic Forum, she emphasised that Europe is “massively investing in our energy security and independence” with interconnectors and grids based on domestically produced sources of power.

      The EU, she said, is trying to promote nuclear and renewables as much as possible “to bring down prices and cut dependencies; to put an end to price volatility, manipulation and supply shocks,” calling for a faster transition to clean energy.

      “Because homegrown, reliable, resilient and cheaper energy will drive our economic growth and deliver for Europeans and secure our independence,” she added.

      Comment – Power play: Can a defensive Europe stick with decarbonisation in Davos?

      AES boss calls for “more technical talk” on supply chains

      Earlier, the energy security panel tackled the risks related to supply chains for clean energy and electrification, which are being partly fuelled by rising demand from data centres and electric vehicles.

      The minerals and metals that are required for batteries, cables and other components are largely under the control of China, which has invested massively in extracting and processing those materials both at home and overseas. Efforts to boost energy security by breaking dependence on China will continue shaping diplomacy now and in the future, the experts noted.

      Copper – a key raw material for the energy transition – is set for a 70% increase in demand over the next 25 years, said Mike Henry, CEO of mining giant BHP, with remaining deposits now harder to exploit. Prices are on an upward trend, and this offers opportunities for Latin America, a region rich in the metal, he added.

      At ‘Davos of mining’, Saudi Arabia shapes new narrative on minerals

      Andrés Gluski, CEO of AES – which describes itself as “the largest US-based global power company”, generating and selling all kinds of energy to companies – said there is a lack of discussion about supply chains compared with ideological positioning on energy sources.

      Instead he called for “more technical talk” about boosting battery storage to smooth out electricity supply and using existing infrastructure “smarter”. While new nuclear technologies such as small modular reactors are promising, it will be at least a decade before they can be deployed effectively, he noted.

      In the meantime, with electricity demand rising rapidly, the politicisation of the debate around renewables as an energy source “makes no sense whatsoever”, he added.

      The post Climate at Davos: Energy security in the geopolitical driving seat  appeared first on Climate Home News.

      Climate at Davos: Energy security in the geopolitical driving seat 

      Continue Reading

      Climate Change

      A Record Wildfire Season Inspires Wyoming to Prepare for an Increasingly Fiery Future

      Published

      on

      As the Cowboy State faces larger and costlier blazes, scientists warn that the flames could make many of its iconic landscapes unrecognizable within decades.

      In six generations, Jake Christian’s family had never seen a fire like the one that blazed toward his ranch near Buffalo, Wyoming, late in the summer of 2024. Its flames towered a dozen feet in the air, consuming grassland at a terrifying speed and jumping a four-lane highway on its race northward.

      A Record Wildfire Season Inspires Wyoming to Prepare for an Increasingly Fiery Future

      Continue Reading

      Trending

      Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com