Connect with us

Published

on

So, we touched down in Baku! After a full day of travel and getting acclimated, we have begun to prepare for the 29th Conference of Parties (COP29).

This is my fourth COP, and I have many thoughts and things to attend to, and yet I still don’t know much about what each day will look like for me just yet. It took me two of these conferences to figure out what it is I’m doing here and why, and three to figure out how I can do these things well and care for myself and others around me.

I get to serve in the role as a house mother for the second year in a row with the Climate Generation delegation, and I am honored to be able to share what I know about this confusing, exciting, disheartening, invigorating, ridiculous, massive conference. I am excited to participate with folks who are experiencing it for the first time. To me, this means that part of my role is to make the house feel like home however I may and however folks need, offering an ear to vent to or get some questions answered from one of the various coalition spaces that I am in, and that, wherever I may, I should be connecting these brilliant folks with the global movement for climate justice.

As many may know, I am the Director of Youth N’Power and the Youth N’Power Network, a year-round, apprenticeship-modeled program for youth in Minneapolis and a network of young folks that are learning and/or working on becoming community organizers that operate through the lens of Environmental Justice. In another capacity, I am the Environmental Justice Youth Program Director and Global Climate Justice Coordinator with MN Interfaith Power & Light. I also get the pleasure of holding space in the U.S. Fair Shares Collaborative and national Climate Reparations Camp. To be at the crux of these spaces where environment, relationships, and just transition intersect is both a challenge and a blessing.

I have 10 apprentices in Minneapolis and 3 nationally, and this year, the second of my apprentices, Manny, is attending COP29 with our delegation. Now that I am starting to see connections between local and global movements, having some of the youth that I get to spend time with and mentor also learn to navigate this space feels really cool. And, it makes it clear how much is at stake and just how far behind our country is as it relates to the global movement to move towards a just future.

The UNFCCC and the Conference of Parties can certainly be a nightmare. And, it can also be a place where you make lifelong friends, understand how folks are actualizing real solutions to overlapping crises (in addition to climate), and build a much-needed global community.

I know in my spirit that building global community is the primary solution to these crises, because while we may be at a climate conference, the United Nations does not hold the solutions to what people and the planet experience.

Community holds the solutions. Community holds the solutions. Community holds the solutions. I say that as many times as I can, so that it becomes a concept that most people, especially Americans, understand. We have been led to believe that we must do individual action only in order to make practical change, and yet, we are at a conference where the COP29 host president in Azerbaijan has set up active deals to further fossil fuel production before day one even commences.

I find myself wondering to what end we are supposed to organize towards while these oil tycoons and governments continue making deals that line their pockets and further rocket us towards our own demise. This is the stuff of nightmares. And yet, we persist?

Today, on the day before the conference begins, Manny and I attended two meetings for coalition spaces: CAN-I (Climate Action Network International) and DCJ (The Global Campaign to Demand Climate Justice) members’ assembly. There were a few takeaways that I will be watching out for as the conference begins: CAN’s Fossil of the Day award — one of their major advocacy tools that call our UNFCCC parties (countries) blocking climate action and progress in negotiations based on the Network’s strategies and priorities. This is awarded to countries that are “doing their best at being the worst.” I know that the United States usually wins the award, and this adds to my personal shame about representing the country that is the highest historical emitter of Greenhouse Gases and the largest producer of Fossil Fuels, in the conference.

We also learned of a number of planned actions in support of and solidarity with Palestine, calling for an end to the genocide (and all genocides happening globally at present). Any action within the COP space must be sanctioned by the U.N., and it is imperative that anyone reading this understands that genocide is very much so an environmental and climate issue.

Knowing that some of the largest Environmental NGOs are standing in solidarity with oppressed and marginalized peoples and places reminds me why I do this work.

The second meeting we attended was for DCJ. We also talked through strategy, and the schedule of events for Palestine and other justice-focused initiatives. One of the scariest things i heard today, before the conference even begun, is that while we may be talking about staying below a 1.5 global average annual temperature increase, in actuality, we are looking at a 2 degree average increase by 2040 at the latest, and 3 degrees by the end of the century. That means that a child born today could live in a world that is unlivable, and the actions of our governments and these corporations are accelerating a future with an earth that can’t support life as we know it, or the lack of any future altogether.

The last thing I’ll add as we go into this COP is that it is a climate finance year. In order to ensure that we have some hope for a future for all generations, peoples, and planet, the Global North needs to pay its Fair Share of climate finance to the Global South. That figure is something to the tune of $5 Trillion per year. For the U.S., our Fair Share is 46% of that, or 446 Billion Dollars, annually. 

This figure is one that has grown as polluting countries have continued to pollute and destroy all of existence, and the Global South calls for us to begin the process of reparation. The narratives surrounding reparations have been debated for too long, and while year after year and conference after conference, we somehow never can find the money to do so, our nation somehow finds the money to send so that atrocious harms can continue. 

This reality is one that most Americans refuse to understand, acknowledge, or talk about, and so in my fourth go-around, I hear the same two questions rising to the surface: Is the Global North going to pay its Fair Share and repair harm? For the Global South is paying from their own pockets and with their lives and livelihoods, and we still treat the climate crisis as a conversation for activists only, where I come from. Will we be able to see a future for the next seven generations, or will we fail time and again, to change our understanding of what needs to happen in the present? These are my thoughts as I go forth into Day 1 of Week 1, of a conference that has happened every year of my life since my birth, and still hasn’t figured out how to fix these issues.

Analyah is a Climate Generation Window Into COP delegate for COP29. To learn more, we encourage you to meet the full delegation, support our delegates, and subscribe to the Window Into COP digest.

Analyah Schlaeger dos Santos

Analyah Schlaeger dos Santos is a young Afro-Brazilian-American woman born and raised in North Minneapolis, Minnesota. After living in Atlanta, Georgia, she moved back to Minneapolis in 2015 to study Global Relations and Environmental Justice at the University of Minnesota and the Higher Education Consortium for Urban Affairs. She has been an aquatic guide to all ages for 12 years and counting and loves to infuse environmental wellness into her frameworks.

She is currently the International Campaign lead at MN Interfaith Power & Light, and serves on the board of multiple local organizations.

The post Context, Priorities, and Plans for COP29 appeared first on Climate Generation.

Context, Priorities, and Plans for COP29

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Nature cannot be ignored by Europe’s next big budget

Published

on

Adeline Rochet is a programme manager for the Corporate Leaders Group Europe, a business coalition driving the transition to a sustainable, competitive, and resilient economy convened by the University of Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership (CISL).

Europe’s economy depends on the natural world functioning as it should, but the effects of climate change risk undermining increasingly delicate ecosystems. Talks about the European Union’s next long-term budget miss this fact.

Climate-related losses in the EU have already reached €822 billion since 1980, with a quarter of that damage concentrated in just the past four years. Ecosystems are under increasing pressure: more than 80% of protected habitats are in poor condition, soils are degrading and water stress is rising across the continent.

The latest state of the climate report by the EU’s Earth monitoring service Copernicus confirms this worrying state of affairs: 95% of Europe experienced above-average temperatures in 2025.

Economic exposure to nature-related risk is also growing. Businesses, banks and insurers are beginning to reflect this in their risk assessments.

So, will the policymakers in charge of developing the European Union’s next big budget integrate this vision? We are in the midst of finding out.

    Every seven years, the EU must negotiate a new budget that will help fund priorities over a seven-year-long period. The current one, which runs out next year, is worth more than a trillion euros.

    Talks about the next multiannual financial framework (MFF) for 2028-2034 are now getting serious and the initial outline of this new budget shows it will focus on competitiveness, resilience and prosperity.

    But, as the European Parliament adopted its negotiating position for the crunch budget talks and EU member states shape their approach ahead of a Council meeting on May 26, it is clear that the positioning of nature within this framework is strategically underestimated.

    Why nature impacts economic growth 

    Back in 2022, France’s nuclear power output was severely affected when heatwaves drove up the temperature of the rivers used to cool atomic reactors, impacting other European countries too. This was particularly poor timing given the energy price crisis triggered earlier that year by Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine.

    Low river levels caused by drought have also heavily impacted economic activity and growth in countries like Germany, due to the negative effect on inland trade, while degraded fields in the Netherlands combined with heavy rainfall have ruined potato harvests.

    These examples show that we cannot detach the health of the European economy from the good functioning of nature.

    UN General Assembly backs “climate obligations” set by world’s top court

    Nearly three-quarters of businesses in the eurozone rely directly on ecosystem services such as clean water, fertile soils and pollination. That dependency extends into the financial system, where around 75% of bank lending is exposed to companies dependent on these natural assets.

    They entirely underpin supply chains and financial stability across the European economy. If load-bearing ecosystems collapse, businesses not only face disruption in their own operations, but they will also be exposed to failures from suppliers and customers.

    This is not just a risk for individual companies, it is a threat for the whole system.

    A budget that looks greener than it is

    According to the latest proposals for the next MFF, a single 35% climate and environmental target will replace priorities that used to have distinct funding. As it stands, biodiversity has a 10% target, yet spending has struggled to reach even 8%, already showing how easily it is put to one side in practice.

    In the new framework, biodiversity is absorbed into a broader category with no separate tracking or visibility. Dedicated instruments are folded into larger funding envelopes, and nature-based investments are placed in direct and distorted competition with industrial projects.

    These are often faster to deploy and easier to measure, making them more attractive.

    Headline figures reinforce some appearance of ambition, with €587–635 billion allocated to climate and environmental objectives. But since these are aggregated numbers, they do not show how much will reach ecosystem conservation or restoration.

    Less visibility, weaker accountability

    Biodiversity funding also remains structurally fragile, with around 80% concentrated in agriculture policy rather than supported by a diversified investment strategy.

    This shift is structural: nature has been relegated from a defined priority to a mere discretionary allocation, and the governance model reinforces this dynamic.

    Webinar: From Santa Marta to Bonn – where next for the fossil fuel transition?

    Greater reliance on National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPPs) moves decision-making into national spending choices, where fiscal and domestic political pressure will likely mean long-term ecosystem investments struggle to compete with short-term economic demands.

    The current MFF paints a worrying picture of structural triple risk for nature: reduced visibility, increased competition for funding and weaker accountability.

    Nature is critical infrastructure

    It is a point worth reiterating: investment in nature offers clear economic returns. Healthy ecosystems drive resilience by reducing exposure to climate damage and supporting local economic activity.

    Public finance plays a decisive role in enabling these investments at scale, making budget design a question of risk management and capital allocation.

    Nature-based solutions already perform essential economic functions. They regulate water systems, restore carbon sinks, provide a buffer against extreme weather events and support agricultural productivity.

    These are characteristics of infrastructure. Energy systems, transport networks and digital capacity are treated as strategic investments because they underpin competitiveness.

    Natural systems play the exact same role, so why does the current budget plan not reflect this?

    The next EU budget will shape investment for the decade ahead. Its structure will determine how risks are managed and where capital flows. Nature cannot be erased in favour of competing short-term priorities.

    In the upcoming negotiations, European leaders still have the option to treat nature as a structural objective and a core asset, supporting Europe’s resilience and long-term competitiveness. But they must act now, before it’s too late.

    The post Nature cannot be ignored by Europe’s next big budget appeared first on Climate Home News.

    https://www.climatechangenews.com/2026/05/25/nature-cannot-be-ignored-by-europes-next-big-budget/

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    In Florida, an Agricultural Town in Need of an Economic Boost Eyes Hyperscale Data Centers

    Published

    on

    Across the state’s heartland, communities such as Indiantown are weighing proposals for hyperscale data centers. The massive facilities would reshape Florida’s rural lands.

    INDIANTOWN, Fla.—Carroll McAllister frets over the prospect of a hyperscale data center opening next to the grassy expanse where she grew up, in a shack her father built.

    In Florida, an Agricultural Town in Need of an Economic Boost Eyes Hyperscale Data Centers

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    USDA Extends Pause on Loans for Controversial Digesters That Turn Manure Into Biogas

    Published

    on

    Anaerobic digester loans showed “significant delinquency rates,” the U.S. Department of Agriculture said, while environmental groups see the technology driving an expansion of large-scale animal farming operations.

    The federal government’s pause on new loans for anaerobic digesters, the controversial method of converting animal manure from large-scale feeding operations into biogas, will now extend through the end of the year.

    USDA Extends Pause on Loans for Controversial Digesters That Turn Manure Into Biogas

    Continue Reading

    Trending

    Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com