Saudi Arabia is making history with the world’s largest grid-scale battery energy storage project. BYD Energy Storage has signed a 12.5 GWh contract with the Saudi Electricity Company (SEC), bringing their total collaboration to 15.1 GWh. This big project will help Saudi Arabia reach its Vision 2030 goals. It will boost renewable energy use and ensure a steady power supply.
What Is a Battery Energy Storage System?
A Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) is a technology that stores electricity for later use. It helps balance the power grid by storing excess energy when production is high and releasing it when demand rises. BESS is key for using renewable energy sources, like solar and wind. These sources don’t produce power all the time.
In 2023, new BESS installations worldwide reached 74 gigawatt-hours, a significant increase from 27 gigawatt-hours in 2022. BESS deployment is projected to grow at a 24% annual rate from 2024 to 2030, surpassing 400 gigawatt-hours by the end of the decade.

Key Benefits of BESS:
- Improves Grid Stability – Helps prevent power outages by providing energy during peak demand.
- Enables Renewable Energy Use – Stores solar and wind energy for use when the sun isn’t shining or the wind isn’t blowing.
- Reduces Energy Costs – Allows utilities to store electricity when prices are low and use it when prices rise.
- Lowers Carbon Emissions – Reduces reliance on fossil fuels by making renewable energy more reliable.
- Enhances Energy Security – Ensures a more stable and secure energy supply, reducing dependence on imported fuels.
Why This Project Matters
Saudi Arabia aims to generate 50% of its electricity from renewables by 2030. However, renewable energy sources like solar and wind can be unpredictable. The 12.5 GWh battery storage project will solve this issue by storing energy and ensuring a steady power supply. This is very important in Saudi Arabia. The nation’s energy demand is high because of extreme temperatures and heavy electricity use.
BYD’s MC Cube-T ESS storage system will be installed at five locations across Saudi Arabia. These batteries use advanced Cell-to-System (CTS) technology, which improves efficiency and maximizes energy storage. This system will stabilize the grid. It will manage peak energy demands and support the growing renewable energy sector.
BYD’s Bold Move: A 15.1 GWh Commitment
BYD has been a pioneer in battery storage technology for over 17 years. The company has delivered more than 75 GWh of battery storage systems to 350 projects in 110 countries. Its energy storage solutions serve many areas, like power generation, utilities, and commercial use.
BYD’s technology is based on lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, which are known for their high safety, long lifespan, and efficiency. Unlike conventional lithium-ion batteries, LFP batteries do not overheat easily, making them a more reliable option for large-scale energy storage. The CTS (Cell-to-System) integration used in the Saudi project allows for better space utilization and higher energy density, ensuring maximum performance.
This latest project in Saudi Arabia cements BYD’s position as a global leader in energy storage. The company is known for its focus on innovation, high-quality products, and strong after-sales support.
More Than Just a Battery: The Role of BESS in the Clean Energy Transition
Energy storage is key to making renewable energy reliable. Without storage, electricity must be used as soon as it is generated. Battery systems store energy for later use. This makes renewables easier to use and cuts down on fossil fuel reliance.
Major benefits of large-scale energy storage include:
- Greater Energy Independence – Countries can rely more on their own renewable energy instead of importing fossil fuels.
- Enhanced Power Grid Resilience – Protects against blackouts and grid failures.
- Economic Growth – Creates jobs and attracts investment in clean technology.
- Efficient Energy Management – Utilities can store energy during low-demand periods and release it when demand is high, improving efficiency.
- Supports Electric Vehicle Expansion – As more electric vehicles (EVs) hit the roads, energy storage systems will help balance charging demand and prevent grid overload.
Looking ahead to 2025, Rho Motion, an energy consultant firm expects another strong year for BESS. There are over 400GWh of projects in the grid pipeline and continued growth in the commercial and industrial market.
Looking further ahead, the pipeline for 2025–2030 now exceeds 1TWh—an impressive leap from 2021 when the market was just 1% of that size. The past year saw new regions developing capacity markets and launching government-backed tenders, with a 53% increase in BESS deployment.

Key markets to watch in 2025 include Australia, Saudi Arabia, Central and Eastern Europe, Canada, and Chile.
Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030: A Renewable Energy Powerhouse
Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 aims to diversify the country’s economy and reduce dependence on oil. A big part of this plan is increasing renewable energy use. The BYD-SEC partnership is a major step toward achieving this goal.
Currently, Saudi Arabia is investing heavily in solar and wind energy projects. However, to successfully transition to renewables, energy storage systems are crucial. Without large-scale storage, solar and wind power alone would not be enough to ensure a stable energy supply. This project shows how BESS technology connects renewable energy with energy needs.
This project boosts Saudi Arabia’s energy security. It also makes the country a leader in renewable energy and battery storage technology. As other countries look for solutions to integrate renewables into their energy grids, Saudi Arabia’s approach could serve as a model.
Breaking Barriers in Energy Storage: Challenges and Opportunities
While battery storage has many benefits, there are still challenges that need to be addressed:
- High Initial Costs – Large-scale energy storage projects require significant investment.
- Battery Lifespan and Recycling – Used batteries must be properly recycled to avoid environmental harm.
- Scalability – Expanding storage capacity to meet increasing energy demands requires continued innovation.
Despite these challenges, the energy storage market is growing rapidly. According to industry reports, global energy storage capacity is expected to reach 1,000 GWh by 2030, driven by increasing demand for clean energy solutions. In the same year, BESS could cut global carbon emissions by over 100 million metric tons yearly.
The 12.5 GWh battery energy storage project between BYD and Saudi Arabia is a game-changer. It will improve energy stability, boost renewable energy adoption, and support Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 goals.
Energy storage is key to the clean energy transition. Projects like this show how important advanced battery technology is for a sustainable future. As global demand for energy storage grows, BYD’s leadership in innovation and large-scale deployment will continue to shape the future of renewable energy.
- READ MORE: BYD to Partner with European Automakers to Offset Emissions Through Carbon Credit Pooling
The post BYD and Saudi Arabia Tandem for World’s Largest Battery Energy Storage Project appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

