Connect with us

Published

1 year ago

on

Weather Guard Lightning Tech

Boosting Turbine Performance Through Electrical Insights: ABB WindESCo Collaboration

In this episode, Allen and Joel speak with ABB’s Daniel Gerber, Senior VP, Global Product Group Manager Wind, System Drives and WindESCo’s Founder and CEO Mo Dua about their companies’ new partnership. They are combining ABB’s capabilities in wind turbine electrical systems with WindESCo’s optimization software platforms. This collaboration aims to help wind farm operators monitor the health of electrical components to reduce downtime and maximize energy production. Plus, we discuss pilot projects planned for 2024 to demonstrate the value of jointly leveraging ABB’s converter expertise and WindESCo’s analytics.

Reach out to Windesco and ABB!

Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly email update on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, LinkedIn and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary Barnes’ YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!

Pardalote Consulting – https://www.pardaloteconsulting.com
Weather Guard Lightning Tech – www.weatherguardwind.com
Intelstor – https://www.intelstor.com

Allen Hall: Welcome back to the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast. I am Allen Hall and I’m here with Joel Saxum, and we have some really interesting guests today. We have Daniel Gerber, Senior Vice President, Global Product Group Manager, Wind System Drive from ABB, and he’s based in Zurich, Switzerland. And also Mo Dua from WindESCo.

Mo is the founder and CEO of WindESCo, which is based in Massachusetts, my, my state. And the reason we’re talking here today is because there has been a minority stake in WindESCo from ABB. And when this news release popped out a couple of months ago now, I thought, man, this is a great alignment. Finally, the wind industry is doing something on the electrical side that is interesting, because everything we hear is on the mechanical side.

It’s all about blades, leading edge erosion, how the gearboxes are breaking, how everything’s leaking oil. But the, a lot of the improvements that are going to happen in wind energy and in the production side are going to happen because the electrical control system and the converters and everything downstream are working properly and doing what they should.

And this is where WindESCo and ABB come in together. So Daniel and Mo, welcome to the program.

Daniel Gerber: Hello, welcome, and thanks for having me. Thank you.

Allen Hall: So would you like to just describe what brought the two of you together and how that relationship started and what the plan is for the combined effort.

Daniel Gerber: We at ABB, we have a strong commitment in decarbonizing the power generation. And therefore the wind business for us is a strong part of our strategy. Our customers are asking us, what can we do actually to improve the situation, to get more out of our equipment, more out of our turbines. How can we make them as available as possible?

And we at ABB, we have 17, 000 converters in the field, more than 21, 000 generators in the field operating. So we have a couple of years of good experience. And what we try to do is to find a partner, which can basically help us to bring a 360 degrees view on this. And we found with WindESCo, a partner, which has a credible offering into the market.

And basically allows us to not just see the electrical part, but as well have the mechanical parts together. And therefore we found that WindESCo is one of our preferred partner in this collaboration.

Mo Dua: Yeah.

Thank you, Daniel. From my perspective, WindESCo has been a company that’s been hyper focused on addressing the challenges in the wind sector.

And as you guys know, there’s a lot of challenges in the sector, a lot of moving parts right in the sector also. So We have ourselves been looking to expand beyond just performance optimization into asset health monitoring. And our customers have been sharing with us a lot of the challenges that they are facing on the electrical sides, right?

Electrical systems are becoming even more important because offshore turbines are mostly electrical, right? Most of these offshore turbines don’t have gearboxes. So it’s just been a point that keeps coming up again and again. And ABB has so much depth of experience in the electrical side with generators, converters and motors that really allows us to expand beyond mechanical into electrical and really address the pain points of the industry.

So ABB with its global footprint and leadership in the electrical subsystem was just an ideal partner for us. The deal happened. It took time. Of course, ABB is a big company. But there was a lot of alignment. So the deal happened fairly quickly.

Allen Hall: And Joel well knows, and we’ve been out to some wind sites just recently, where the effort is primarily on the mechanical.

And when you look at even converters in particular, because this is an ABB sweet point. That a converter is just pulled and replaced. Anything electronic on a wind turbine is pulled and swapped. They’re removed and replaced. There is very little in terms of optimization there. It is just to keep it running.

And I think what we’re seeing is there’s a lot of turbines, and when the turbines go through the development cycle, They’re made to produce power, but they may not be producing it the most efficient way. And this is where WindESCo’s fine fixed measure comes in part, and plus the swarm in terms of wind asset.

It’s a, to look at the electrical side and it’s about time we did that So I want to touch on that and Mo maybe you can touch on this from your perspective. It does seem like the electrical side of the turbines have not been touched very much in terms of control Optimization and performance.

Mo Dua: Yeah, you raise a good point there Allen because it is an area that has not been addressed, or I want to say it can be addressed much better, right?

So the maximum number of events leading to downtime is on the electrical side. And typically what we’ve heard is if there is a fault on the electrical side the site people mostly just reset the fault without addressing the core problem, right? What is it that the fault keeps coming up, right? So they would just reset the fault and continue with the turbine.

And what happens then is the converter fails, right? And the power module, I’ve heard power module blow up and there’s shrapnel all over the place. So owners have asked us, right? They have asked us, can you figure out why this power module failed? Can you figure out what led to the failure? What exactly has failed? Is it a $5 condenser or is it something more expensive that has failed? Because we got to go replace the whole thing. And the third most important thing is, how do I reduce this failure rate? And what is happening is because this is also something we’ve heard from our customers is some sites like some of the sites in eastern Canada, the humidity is going up quite a lot because there’s a lot of precipitation. And when the humidity is going up, they’re having more converter failures and downtime because of electric and this is something we’re seeing in other parts of the world also.

These are the challenges that I think the industry needs to mature. The industry wants to mature. And these are the challenges we will be addressing with ABB’s help.

Joel Saxum: Yeah it likens me to, okay, so mechanical things usually get fixed fairly commonly, right? Even if you’re going let’s just take this back to the general populace.

A vehicle, a truck, a car, whatever like that. If the brakes are bad, you can see that, you can fix it. If the transmission goes bad, you can figure that out, right? You won’t be able to shift gears, or it won’t go, or a rear end blows up, or something like that. You can fix that, because it’s physical, but how many times, I know, like in my life, and whatnot Oh, we have some electrical gremlins, we would call them, in the machine, right? We got electrical gremlins in this car, and at that point in time, man, it really takes someone who’s super knowledgeable to diagnose that problem, to chase that thing down.

You got a guy sitting in there with, or, two or three, couple girls, couple gals. Everybody’s got test lights and meters and they’re trying to figure out where this could be and how this fault could happen and these things. So you start to get into this really complicated fixes for problems. And that’s why up tower or out in the field, big major components just get swapped, right?

Electrical components are just like, ah, we can’t figure this out boom, stick a different one in. And then you have that situation like you’re talking about, Mo, where there might be something different that’s causing this converter, this electrical component to fail down the line. And what they’re basically doing is just resetting the stripped circuit breaker constantly.

We used to see this in the oil and gas world, where they had a button on some of these mechanical things called a Murphy switch. You guys ever hear of a Murphy switch? So a Murphy switch is basically Murphy’s Law, whatever could go wrong, would go wrong, right? So they had these buttons that they would install called Murphy switch, and when you’d hold in the Murphy switch, it would override all the breakers, and let you run.

So there’s veh these vehicles that used to be in the oil and gas field that you’d be, the thing would shut down, there would be these old Cummins motors, whatever, and they would shut down. Cause they couldn’t figure out what was going electronically. And if you just held the Murphy switch and it would run, but there was no telling what damage it would do to the rest of the machine, but you’d get home.

But that was about it. That’s what you guys are taking on here is the fixing these electrical or addressing these electrical issues that just go, ah, I don’t know, guys, we’ll just move on and put a different piece in.

Daniel Gerber: Yeah. And let me maybe chip into this. I think the age of the converter plays here a big role, right?

The newer models you can imagine, they are like a car. They can diagnose themselves. They know what they are at. They as well can find out what is wrong with them. They can basically provide you the information, what has to be changed, what has to be done as long as you use the correct software with it.

It will basically give you a feedback. However, since we are knowing some of our wind turbines, they are in the field already more than 20 years. The technology 20 years back was slightly different and we have as well, the fact in the field that some of the producers of the equipment might not exist anymore.

And I think this brings a lot of challenges to the industry for that. Our products in general at ABB, they are circular in terms of circular economy by design or by default, they are made to be repaired. And we have as well the offering for that in terms of repair workshops all around the world where you can bring a module, we can open it, we can diagnose the problem, we can give you a feedback and then typically we repair them and bring them back.

So there is a possibility of doing that, of course. However, I understand the frustration maybe if a supplier a couple of years back does not exist anymore. And now I think there are people sometimes a little bit in stress of what to do now because there is a speaking partner missing and maybe here we can help as well in the future.

Allen Hall: Yeah. And I think that’s key, right? Because we do have this 20 year problem of particularly converters of the technology has improved so much. And ABB is running on the forefront of that. Converters are so much smarter than they were. And if you have an older turbine and a converter dies, what are you going to do?

Hopefully you’re going to put a new ABB in its place that actually gives you some information about on the performance side. But the repair side, I think, is really the critical piece at the moment. I think a lot of operators, particularly in the United States, will pull a converter out and put a new one in and put the old converter back in the O& M building and just let it sit there.

And they don’t realize that those things are repairable, that they can recycle them, put them back in use, and that’s where the knowledge of ABB comes in, because you guys at ABB are doing a tremendous job of creating converters that can have a longer lifetime. And Daniel, I think you ought to talk to that a little bit, because I don’t think a lot of operators know that right now.

Daniel Gerber: Yeah. Let’s talk about this. Our products, they are designed to live as long as possible. Of course, as you have mentioned earlier Electronic has a defined design lifespan, so that it will not live forever. But actually our converters are designed that you can replace the critical parts after 15, 20 years

depending on let’s say the mission profiles and the circumstances they were running. Because you can, as as Mo earlier said, different environmental factors might be better or worse for the converter. For example, if the design of the turbine house is not well done, it can have an impact on the converter lifetime because you might have humidity in areas where there shouldn’t be humidity.

These are all different factors which play here together. However, in any case. The electronics and the modularity of the products are actually designed that they can be repaired and lifetime extended. We offer as well now, for example, an upgrade kit for the control platform to make all the math, to make all the models connectable and to have new functionality, for example, in the area of grid code compatibility of all the converters, all these things are coming because they are really needed.

Allen Hall: So this, this next generation of the converters that are out in the field at the moment. The communication piece of this is, I think the most important part. Because we all think about a wind turbine. We think about the blades, the generators and all the mechanical aspects, but what we’re really producing is electricity.

And electricity happens with the converters. Without the converters, you have nothing. And so they become a critic critical piece of that power chain. Having more data there, I think makes infinite sense. And to be able to basically self diagnose or to upgrade in some cases, if you have old converters to upgrade into something that has a basically a self a data feature that provides a data stream that then WindESCo could plug into and help monitor what’s happening. I think that makes infinite sense here because we seem to be missing some of the obvious gains in the industry on the electrical side. This is one of them on the converter side.

And I, this, if you listen, people will talk in the field about ABB is that obviously high quality product, right? Then you’ll hear that all the time. I think what they’re missing is all the benefits and features that are inside a converter at the moment because they just don’t realize the changes and the upgrades that have been made in even the last 10 years.

It’s remarkable.

Daniel Gerber: I think to that point, important is that you have all the information available. And I think there is where we believe WindESCo has a really great coverage with their product. And if we can add there some of our converter knowledge, you get a 360 degrees view and I think this is what he in the end actually need to have for the right measure at the right time in place.

Joel Saxum: Mo, let me ask you a question, then, how this fits into something. Because Allen and I have been talking about this in the background. And we’ve been talking about CMS and some other items, is we’re starting to get to the age, at least in the United States, Europe has been there a little bit longer than we have where a lot of these turbines are being, are mature, right?

And now we’re getting to those decisions where it’s lifetime extension decisions. How do we make sure that this turbine runs up to its 20 or 25 year life? And in some cases past it, right? Because we actually have heard from some people in the industry saying, Yeah, we’ve got a mandate to run these turbines for 30 years now.

That’s five and ten years beyond their expected life. How can you guys help the industry with that lifetime extension problem? Or lifetime extension decision, maybe, is the question?

Mo Dua: Lifetime is a complicated subject, right? That probably deserves its own podcast. Certainly where we can help is with the health monitoring of the turbine subsystems.

And like Daniel said, and Allen pointed out, there’s a whole wealth of information that is sitting in the converter. And I’m not going to get into details right now, but there’s, we think of getting data from wind turbines at one second, five second. And when you go into the converter, you go into kilohertz frequency of data.

And a lot of different streams of data, and I wasn’t aware of it till I chatted with my friends at ABB. And they made us aware that there’s a whole wealth of information sitting in the converter that can be used for health monitoring of other components in the wind turbine, right? So there’s a lot of data that has been actually locked up sitting in that, according to ABB, this is the most intelligent piece of the turbine.

I’m sure anyone who makes their component thinks it’s the most intelligent, but there’s basically a whole bunch of data sitting in the converter, right? Which can be leveraged to optimize the whole turbine.

Allen Hall: Mo, you opened the door, so I gotta let Daniel at least walk through it a little bit.

Daniel, what are some of the things that the converters can do that people don’t even realize today?

Daniel Gerber: Yeah, We are in a very early stage on this, and I think there is an entire world to be explored. However, important is that you start with it. And this is what we are doing right now together with WindESCo.

We have kicked it off in order to look into how can we combine mechanical and electrical data into a product. And we have started. But we are far away of having here the final solution. This is just the starting point of our work and the collaboration between the two companies. And the important thing here is that we speak the same language.

We have technical folks on both sides, which have the same language, which they talk. I think this is the environment which we have to create in order to get here something out.

Allen Hall: It’s such a good partnership together. It’s going to make a big difference in the wind industry. And as Joel pointed out, there’s a lot of lifetime extension work going on.

And as the operators start looking as what they’re planning for 2024 and into 2025, particularly in the United States with the IRA bill, there’s a lot of opportunities to improve the turbine they have to be much more productive. And that’s where the ABB WindESCo connection happens. What’s so what’s the future here, guys where is this relationship going?

What’s some of what’s give us a little bit of insight. You got to give us a little bit of a sneak peek here as where this is going and what we can expect to see.

Mo Dua: Yeah. Of course the product teams are working very closely together. In 2024, what we are doing is we are doing pilot projects on the electrical side. And we are probably going to entertain about three or four projects because of limited capacity, right? And a few turbines for each of these pilot projects just to show the world the value of the joint product here. And really what we’ll be doing is taking that data out of the converter and addressing those key problems that they have highlighted, right?

When is the converter going to fail? Why is it failing? How can I reduce the failure rate? So that’s the first step in introducing this whole new concept into the industry. Yeah. So that’s the plan for 24 is start with a few pilot projects.

Joel Saxum: I got to imagine anybody that is in charge of business interruption costs has to be knocking on your door right now.

Anybody that suffers from that, it’s going to be going. Yes. Please give it to me now.

Daniel Gerber: I think we are at the starting point right now, as Mo said, we are starting with the converted data as a first part. And then I think over the next coming years, we want to expand this so that we could look not just at the convert, but at the electrical drive train, because I think then is the value that’s coming together.

And you have different products together. And if you have all the information like we have in the WindESCo platform, you can then hopefully give a feedback. Not just for one product, but for several components within the, in the turbine. I think this is our ultimate goal, but this takes time. This will not be tomorrow, but I think we are on a good, and a good starting point here to get this one day done.

Joel Saxum: Okay, so Mo and Daniel, I asked you guys about Lifetime Extension. However, of course, we know the market is a little bit different here in the United States. A lot of times Lifetime Extension isn’t even a word that’s spoken inside of the building. It is just repower 10 years. We’re going to put new ones up.

And at that repower, a lot of people take that opportunity to upgrade, to install retrofit other items, right? So sometimes it’s a completely driven by whoever the, the company or OEM or service provider, they say, just give me a package and I’ll upgrade. However, there’s a lot of other people out there that are picking and choosing ad hoc, off of a menu and building their own solutions for Repower. So how do you guys fit into the Repower equation on the WindESCo side and ABB?

Mo Dua: So you recognize the definition of Repower is different in Europe and different in the United States. So how Daniel generally thinks about repower is different. How people here think about repower is after 10 years, I get requalified for PTC, right?

That’s repower here. So I think there’s a lot of avenues that we’ve discussed. For example, upgrades to the converter, right? Upgrades on the generator is one thing. Like Daniel said, the generation or the technology of converters has changed tremendously in the last 10 years. And the owners can benefit with newer converters, which are data enabled and have higher availability.

So that’s one aspect. The other aspect is SWARM. I think you guys have covered this in a previous podcast. SWARM leads to more AEP and it’s a good solution, not for all wind plants. But for some wind plants, which are losing a lot of energy to wakes. And then recently, even the analytics solution we have fine fixed measure was being used for repower to really improve the performance of the wind plant.

So the owner said, Hey, we want more AEP, not just higher reliability. We want both reliability as well as AEP. And so we worked on a package to give more AEP using just analytics as an upfront solution. So increase the output of the wind plant in the first six months to one year, which they can benefit then for the whole life.

So I think there’s a real opportunity on the repower side with both the solutions from ABB as well as WindESCo.

Daniel Gerber: To add from ABB’s perspective, we see the repower opportunity, not just as replacing full turbines. We see this more like a tailored menu, which depending on the age of the park, the location and the health state of the turbine we can offer you different upgrade possibilities.

Be this together with your OEM or together with your servicer, the partner upgrade provider. I think we have flexible opportunities to either replace or refurbish existing drives. Upgrade them or as well replace or help to replace the entire drive train. I think we have here many, which we can offer to everybody who is in need.

Allen Hall: I think this is exciting because you’re talking my language, electrical and making the electrical systems work better. And this is the time, we’ve reached that time where we have enough brainpower and enough knowledge on the turbines to make the turbines better. So this is a great connection between ABB and WindESCo.

So how does everybody reach out and find You on the internet, Mo. I guess just go to WindESCo’s website, windesco.com

Mo Dua: We have a contact us link on our page. So reach us at windesco.com.

Allen Hall: And Daniel, ABB is a big company. So how do they get ahold of the converter division of ABB?

Daniel Gerber: So you can either go on our webpage, which is the easiest one.

However, I think we are present in 80 countries in the world. So if you have a real need reach out to your local ABB units, they can find us. And maybe they can even help you to get a physical contract in your region. And they know exactly what we can offer and how to connect to us. And they can for sure help you to have your the right contacts in place where you are and we will come there.

Allen Hall: Mo and Daniel, this has been fantastic to have you on the program. I’m really excited about what the future brings for both of you. And yeah, we’d love to have you back on the program because you can tell us all the great things you’ve been working on. And I’m excited to see what the future looks like.

Boosting Turbine Performance Through Electrical Insights: ABB WindESCo Collaboration

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

A New Battery Rebate Coming to Australian Households!

Published

3 weeks ago

on

April 8, 2025

By

Big News for Australian Households!

The Albanese Government has just unveiled a landmark commitment that could make it significantly easier and cheaper for families to install home solar batteries.  

If re-elected, the government plans to roll out the National Battery Booster Program, which will offer a generous rebate per kilowatt-hour (kWh) on the cost of eligible home battery systems. 

This announcement is a significant leap forward in Australia’s clean energy journey, and it has the potential to benefit millions of homes already using solar – and even more who are considering the switch.   

What is the National Battery Booster Program?

The National Battery Booster Program is designed to make solar batteries more accessible to everyday Australians by reducing upfront costs through a government-funded rebate.  

While the exact rebate value per kWh is yet to be finalised, the intention is clear: to make it more affordable for homeowners to store the energy they generate from their solar systems and use it when it’s most needed. 

This smart move aligns with Australia’s long-term climate goals and addresses rising concerns over electricity prices and energy security.  

Why a Home Battery Makes Sense Now More Than Ever

Home solar batteries are “the missing link” in Australia’s solar revolution. Over 4 million Australian homes now have solar panels – but only a small percentage have a battery to store excess power for later use. 

Without a battery, much of the solar power generated during the day is sent back to the grid, often for a low feed-in tariff.  

Then, in the evening when households use more power, they have to buy electricity from the grid, often at higher rates—installing a home battery bridges this gap. 

Here’s what a battery lets you do: 

  • Use that stored energy during peak usage times (usually at night) 
  • Reduce reliance on the grid 
  • Avoid high electricity prices 
  • Gain energy independence  

How Much Do Solar Batteries Cost?

The cost of home battery systems in Australia varies, depending on the size and brand. On average: 

  • A small battery (around 5 kWh) can cost between $4,000 and $8,000 
  • Larger systems (10 kWh and above) can go up to $15,000 or more 
  • Most batteries come with a 10-year warranty, making them a reliable long-term investment 

With the incoming rebate under the Battery Booster Program, these prices could drop significantly, putting energy storage within reach for many more Australian families.  

Government Regulations and Safety Standards

Not all batteries are created equal, and not all installers are certified to work with them. That’s why this program comes with strict safety and quality guidelines: 

  • Only batteries that have been assessed and approved by the Clean Energy Regulator will be eligible 
  • Installations must be completed by licensed electricians who have undergone certified battery installation training 
  • This ensures that households are not only getting cost-effective energy storage but also safe and high-performing systems.  

What This Means for You

If you’ve been considering upgrading your solar setup or adding a battery to your home, this is the perfect time to act.  

Whether you already have solar panels or are starting fresh, the National Battery Booster Program could help you: 

  • Significantly reduce your energy bills 
  • Increase the value and sustainability of your home 
  • Take control of your energy use 
  • Protect yourself from future price hikes  

How Can Cyanergy Help?

New Battery Rebate

At Cyanergy, we’ve helped thousands of Australians switch to smarter, more sustainable energy systems. We offer a range of high-quality solar batteries tailored to different household sizes and budgets. 

Our team of experienced energy consultants and CEC-accredited installers are here to help you: 

  • Navigate the rebate process when the program launches 
  • Ensure proper and safe installation 
  • Maximise your long-term energy savings 

Every home is different, and the best system for you depends on your energy usage, solar capacity, and long-term goals. We consider all that and provide expert recommendations every step of the way.  

Next Steps

The Battery Booster Program is set to roll out if the Albanese Government gets re-elected, so it’s wise to start preparing now. 

  • Want to know what kind of battery system fits your home?   
  • Need help understanding potential savings?   
  • Curious about how to qualify for the rebate? 

We’ve got you covered. 

Contact us for a free consultation.   

Visit us at: www.cyanergy.com.au  

Learn more about the program: Smart Energy Council: Battery Booster Program.  

Things to Consider

All home batteries must be approved by the Clean Energy Regulator and listed on the Approved Products List. 

Installation must be carried out by licensed electricians certified to work with batteries.  

Talk to the Experts

Every home is different – and so is every battery solution. That’s where we come in. At Cyanergy, our energy experts can help you find the best battery system for your needs and ensure you maximise this new rebate opportunity. 

Talk to an expert or get a free quote.   

Your Solution Is Just a Click Away



Get Started

The post A New Battery Rebate Coming to Australian Households! appeared first on Cyanergy.

A New Battery Rebate Coming to Australian Households!

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Vattenfall 1.6 GW Farm, AI Learns to “Cheat”

Published

3 weeks ago

on

April 8, 2025

By

Weather Guard Lightning Tech

Vattenfall 1.6 GW Farm, AI Learns to “Cheat”

Allen and Joel discuss Nylacast’s article in PES Wind Magazine about corrosion solutions in offshore wind and Vattenfall’s major investment in Germany’s largest offshore wind farm. They also talk about MIT’s strategic alliance with GE Vernova and the ethical concerns around AI in engineering.

Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly email update on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, LinkedIn and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary Barnes’ YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!

Speaker: [00:00:00] You are listening to the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast brought to you by build turbines.com. Learn, train, and be a part of the Clean Energy Revolution. Visit build turbines.com today. Now here’s your hosts, Allen Hall, Joel Saxum, Phil Totaro, and Rosemary Barnes.

Allen Hall: If you checked your mailbox or checked online, the new PES Wind magazine is out and it is full of great content this quarter.

There’s a very interesting article because we’ve been talking a lot about offshore wind and some of the problems with offshore wind as one of them is corrosion. Just betw between us engineers, it comes up quite a bit. Like, why are we making things outta steel that you don’t need to make outta steel, why you’re not making them out of plastic?

And that’s what, uh, the people at, uh, Nylacast engineer products are doing, um, on some hang off clamps, Joel, uh, which are traditionally really cheap clamps that are made outta steel and rust like [00:01:00] crazy.

Joel Saxum: Yeah. You know, from my oil and gas offshore background, that was one of the things that was always a pain in the butt.

IIRM contracts, as they call ’em, offshore inspection, repair, and maintenance. There’s so much focus on coatings, paint coatings, paint coatings, and it’s a special coating, and it’s this, and you can only apply it during this, and everything has to be painted. And if you can’t allow rust to start anywhere on an offshore facility, it’s in a high corrosion environment, right?

You have salt water, salt spray temperatures, it’s always kind of wet. It’s a marine environment. And so erosion moves very fast, right? So in the, in the oil and gas world, they started creating some things out of like HDPE, which is high density, polyethylene, plastic. Um, it’s even so dense. You can mill it.

It’s really cool stuff. But that’s what, um, the PO the kind of Nylacast engineered products is working with some of these plastic products to replace some of those components in offshore wind turbines that are a pain in the butt to maintain. So when we talk about these hang off clamps. [00:02:00] They grab the cables and other things and they, and they hold them in place in the turbine as need be.

If those are made outta steel and have a coating on ’em, and you get a little bit of vibration and that coating starts to wear away or starts to get a little bit of rust, you’ve got a huge problem. You’ve gotta take the cables out, you gotta take the things off, you’ve gotta replace ’em. You gotta either replace them or you gotta grind on ’em and repaint them.

It is a nightmare. So they’re, what they’re doing with these, um, uh, hang off clamps that are, you know, basically plastic instead of metallic. Or a plastic type instead of metallic is there, they’re removing that need for IRM contracts in the future.

Allen Hall: I think it’s great. It makes a ton of sense. And I’m surprised you haven’t seen more of this because, uh, nylon and and derivatives in nylon are easily recyclable.

It does fit all the things that wind energy is looking for. It doesn’t. Rust recyclable, easy, lightweight, simple. We need to be moving this direction. So if you haven’t checked out PES Wind, you go to PS wind.com and download a [00:03:00] copy. Or if you are at Wind Europe when this episode comes out, it’ll be during the Wind Europe event.

Uh, there’ll be plenty of PES wind hard copies available just. Stop by and grab one. It’s well worth reading a lot of great material this quarter, so check out PESWind.com. Well, Swedish Power Utility Vattenfall has made final investment decisions for two wind farm projects in the German North Sea. The Nordic one project is set to become Germany’s largest offshore wind farm, which marks a significant expansion in Germany’s renewable energy capacity.

Now Vattenfall has approved construction of Nor Lake one and two wind farms. And they’ve also bought back Joel, uh, 49% stake that BASF had. And the, the total capacity of the projects is 1.6 gigawatts. That’s a lot of power with construction. It’s set to begin in 2026 and full operation is expected by 2028.

[00:04:00] And this is gonna power about 1.6 million German households. This is a huge project.

Joel Saxum: I think it’s really cool to hear this about the offshore wind sector, right? So, so much, whether it’s in the US or elsewhere, not a lot of good news, right? We had the Danish, uh, auction news. It didn’t really go anywhere for a little while.

There was a German, uh, auction that was, you know, had a really low subscription rate. So the fact that, uh, Vattenfall is charging forward, and, and this is a key thing too. And we’ll talk, you know, Phil’s usually here to talk about this, but final investment decision is a big milestone, right? There’s all this, you can, these offshore wind projects are being worked on for 6, 8, 10 years before you get to this stage, you know, you’re, you’re looking out, um, doing sub seed mapping and site characterization and all the permitting, and getting all the PPA stuff in place and signing these contracts and all these different things.

And then you finally get to final investment decision and once that is debt box [00:05:00] is checked, then you’re moving. Right. So final investment decision right now, Alan, and it looks like 2026 is gonna be the start of construction. What do you think they’re looking for right now? Are they signing contracts for vessels?

Is that, is that next on the list? It

Allen Hall: has to be right because they signed an agreement with Vestas for 68 turbines. Now this is really fascinating because it’s the V 2 36 15 megawatt turbine, 68 of them. Now, the big discussion about offshore is been, is 15 megawatts enough and should we be pushing to 20 or higher than 20, which is where Siemens GAA appears to be going.

But uh, that and fall sticking with a 15 megawatt turbine. I do think makes a lot of sense because it is less risky and risk is a huge concern at the moment. But Vest has also got a comprehensive long-term service agreement, which has been their, uh, mode of operating for a number of years now, and which [00:06:00] you hear a lot of operators offshore talk about not wanting a long-term agreement, but it seems like Europe is still sticking with it and Augustus is obviously.

Pushing it, uh, at the moment, but 15 megawatts long-term service agreement. Does

this

Joel Saxum: make sense,

Allen Hall: Joel?

Joel Saxum: I think so. And one of the reasons for Vestas as well is we know, ’cause we have someone in our network that used to be operations for Vestas, uh, for the offshore stuff, is they, they’re very well versed in it and they have the facilities and the Keyside facilities ready to go.

So Vesta is, uh, it’s not like, oh, we have these, you know, this gigawatt of order. Fantastic. We got the service contract. Fantastic. Now we need to do all this prep and this build out and figure out how this operation works. That’s not the case. Vestas is ready to rock. They’ve got their own keyside facilities, they have the teams in place, they can make this thing happen and that 15 megawatt turbine, I think it’s interesting that you say this too because you know the other one, um, from the Western OEMs that we’ve been following is that Big Dog 21 megawatt, I think from Siemens Mesa.

[00:07:00] That’s, but that is currently being tested. So to take final investment decision, you have to engage your insurance companies and your banks. If they’re not gonna sign a contract for a turbine that’s still under testing at this stage. Right? This is a, you’re talking a gigawatt of, of turbines at, you know, that’s a billion dollars, that’s a billion US dollars minimum in just tur a turbine order.

Right? So, so just in those turbines, that’s what that thing looks like. And, and if I’m fat and fall, uh uh. And fall. Of course, they’re, they’re developing a lot of on onshore power. They’re a part of some other offshore wind farms. But this is a big, big undertaking and I think you want, when you’re, you know, you’re taking, looking at final investment decisions.

You’re in these conversations with the banks and the insurance and the people that want to de-risk the investment. I think that’s where the, the Vestus thing steps in. I think that’s where it looks good, is de-risking the operation.

Allen Hall: Does esa. [00:08:00] Have a problem now that Vestus seems to be scoring with a 15 megawatt turbine.

It does. The Siemen SC MEA effort get, or the pathway get more difficult because like you said, they’re gonna have to have somebody buy a number of these turbines and it’s gonna have to demonstrate a decent service life for a year or two before you start to see a lot of people jump in and start to purchase those turbines.

In the meantime, Vestus is gonna be. Just building 15 megawatt turbines, one after the other. Does that start to weigh on Siemens cesa in terms of what they want to offer?

Joel Saxum: I don’t think so. Um, and the reason being is, is that 2021 megawatt machine that they’re testing right now is they’re trying to future proof their organization, right?

They’re trying to make sure that for the next push, they’re ready to go. So what’s gonna happen there, in my mind, is when the industry’s ready to make that next step forward, Vestas won’t have an offering. So Siemens will, right? So they’re gonna step into that hole, right? And so right now we [00:09:00] know, uh, Siemens cesa, while they had some troubles with the four and five megawatt onshore platform during that period, their offshore platforms are completely built different.

So the Siemens cesa offshore platforms, they didn’t really slow down in sales. They kept chugging along, right? Like I think, uh, there’s, you know, um, revolution in the States as the Siemens GAA turbine platform. Um, so I don’t, I don’t think it’s gonna hurt them right now. Or, I mean, let, let’s take this one, like you said in the future, I don’t think it’s gonna hurt them right now.

It kind of, it’s kind of painful to be probably on that team, in sales team and watching these, these things roll out and, oh, Vestas is doing this, Vestas is doing that. Um, but I think that, uh, they’ll be okay. It’ll be okay for them in the future. That’s just my take on it.

Allen Hall: That’s a good thought. Well, another thing happened in regards to the Nor Lake Offshore Wind Farm, Helena Bistro.

Who was Vattenfall wind business leader as announced her resignation and is gonna be stepping down from her position. This is kind of big, right? [00:10:00] She’s been there a long time. She’s been the head of that business area for quite a while. Bistro cited a desire to prioritize other things in life after 42 years of operational work.

Okay, so. When I first read this news story, it was kind of popped up in a number of places. Like, oh, there’s been big changes at Vattenfall. And then you read, well, she’s been doing this for 42 years. That’s a long time. And she just made, or just locked in, really, I. The largest offshore wind farm in Germany.

That is something to go out at at the top right. If you’re gonna go out, go out at the top.

Joel Saxum: I think she just did that. Win the Super Bowl and then retire. Just be done. Right? Like, like I, I’m with it. Like, yeah. I think that that happens sometimes in, you know, whether it’s wind, aerospace, the industries, you know, we’re always looking at all kinds of different industries, but when you see these big changes, if it’s a change of someone that they have an organization when they’re like 50.

I know this being ageist, right? But you’re like, Ooh, what’s going on over there? But sometimes [00:11:00] someone’s just retiring, right? Like sometimes it’s like, Hey, am I’m done here? You know? So not all changes in organizations mean good or bad news or, or whatever they may need. Sometimes it’s just, Hey man, I’m done here.

I’m, I’m riding off into the sunset. And you know what, uh, uh, he Helena Bi Bistro here. Or bistro doing this right after signing that thing FID on this big thing. You know what? Boom, springtime is here. I’m gonna enjoy not only my European summers that I usually do, but European summers for a long time now.

Allen Hall: Yeah, it’s a total win. I just didn’t understand the news reports, thought they were totally off on this, and congratulations to Helena because, uh, job well done

Joel Saxum: as busy wind energy professionals staying informed is crucial. I. And let’s face it difficult. That’s why the Uptime podcast recommends PES Wind Magazine.

PES Wind offers a diverse range of in-depth articles and expert insights that dive into the most pressing issues facing our energy future. Whether you’re an [00:12:00] industry veteran or new to wind, PES Wind has the high quality content you need. Don’t miss out. Visit ps Wind.com today.

Allen Hall: Well GE renova and. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology have formed a new strategic alliance aimed at advancing energy technologies and developing industry leaders.

The partnership will focus on accelerating innovation in electrification, decarbonization, and renewables. Now, GE Renova is committing $50 million over five years to this partnership, and it’ll fund research initiatives, student fellowships and internships. That, uh, researchers obviously, and a lot of that’s on electrification, right?

That’s where Chii Renova is focused on. It also, uh, fund about 12 research projects annually, and three master’s students per year will conduct policy research resulting in published white papers. And it looks like they’re gonna have a symposium together at MIT, kind of a joint symposium. [00:13:00] Now, when I first read this, Joel, I thought, wow, this is kind of innovative.

GE Renova just recently moved to Cambridge, which is right next door to MIT and to Harvard. And I know that one of the things about GE moving, uh, Renova moving to that area was that they wanted to build a relationship with universities and try to grab some talent out of there. That makes sense to me.

The odd part about this is MIT doesn’t need the money and MIT. Should be creating students or graduates that are really focused on renewable energy already, and you should see a lot of impact from those students. I think the issue for me is I really haven’t seen as much as I would like to have seen and if, uh, MIT engineers are smart and obviously they are.

Where’s the impact? Uh, and I, I did, I used AI to go look right. I mean, let’s use something that simplifies the process a little bit. And AI is really [00:14:00] looking at MIT and saying they’ve done some work on ya optimization, like on offshore wind farms. So pointing the turbines in slightly different directions to increase power output.

There’s other companies that have been doing that for years that that research is not innovative.

Joel Saxum: Yeah, that’s commercialized.

Allen Hall: Yeah, it’s, it’s commercialized. There’s a lot of companies that offer it, have been offering it for quite a while. So what’s new? I, I don’t know which. You know, GE Renovo can do whatever they want with $50 million.

It does seem like the American universities may not be that place.

Joel Saxum: Yeah, I just, just, just a crackdown of the dollars. Right. $50 million over five years, funding 12 research projects, and that about basically equates to a million dollars per research project with some master’s students funded, thrown in there.

That’s great. I love to see that, but I’m a hundred percent with you. You know, if you, if you watch, I like to watch the innovation space. So I watch these, um, VC companies and I kind of [00:15:00] look at their, their posts and what they’re talking about and stuff. And you see regularly that on the commercial capital side, Europe is way behind the states on innovation funding.

Flip that thing into universities. They’re, they are doing so much more with the, with the dollar per output at their universities. That’s actionable. That actually works for industry than we are. Right. We talk about this all the time in private, but you have the DTUs and, and such over there. DTU puts out just gads of research.

I’ve been a part of some of the research programs when I was, you know, working for a Danish company and the, and it’s like. Research on leading edge erosion and how can we solve that today? Research on this weather pattern and how we can solve this today. What’s that? Doing research on structural loads for turbines and what does that mean and how can we share this with the industry Blade designers and these kind of things are regularly happening in Europe.

At that university, the same level [00:16:00] of the MIT type thing. But in reverse in the US you don’t see whether it’s funded research at universities or it’s funded research from the government. At Government labs, you don’t see that many things coming out that are actionable today, right? You see some reports about things that are kind of neat and maybe future, future wins involvement, and we need to look at the future stuff too.

I get that, but when I see $50 million going to a university, I, I’m thinking, man. If you gave me just a portion of that, I got, we got all kinds of ideas that we can, we can look at that could solve things tomorrow in the industry. And I think that’s what, where we’re at, the, the, the wind industry. I love it.

But, um, we have some black eyes. We have some things we need to solve, some, some ongoing issues that, uh, that are painful. And I think that, uh, throwing money at MIT is not the right way to solve them. That’s just me.

Allen Hall: I was just looking to see what MIT’s endowment is, and it is about $25 [00:17:00] billion right now, so $50 million is a drop in a bucket, which goes back to back to my first point that MIT should be doing this already.

They have plenty of research funds. They have plenty of smart people. If they care about the planet and are trying to be out in front of renewable energy, they would be doing the work already. I know that, and I think the response back is gonna be, well, they’ve been working on solar cells and Sure,

Joel Saxum: okay, that’s fine.

What about spreading the love? Right? What about take 50 million? What? Why not give MIT 10 million? Give Texas Tech 10 million. They have a win program. Give Georgia Tech to 5 million. They got some stuff. They’re doing some stuff in Wind. University of Wyoming’s doing some stuff in wind. North Texas is doing some stuff in wind.

Why not spread that around to the universities that are already working in wind or start a center of excellence at a university where we could get more wind people

Allen Hall: involved. Well, I just hate feeding the bureaucracy more than anything else because it does seem like when there are grants going into colleges and universities.[00:18:00]

When I watch them and see how they behave, and we’ve been sort of peripherally attached to some of this and watched it happen and decided to step out because the bureaucracy is taking so much of the funds that there is very little left to do real research and whatever research there is produced kind of goes into a black hole because it’s not applicable.

That’s a frustrating point. It can’t do that anymore. The bureaucracy can’t take 30, 40, 50, 60% of it and leave a little bit for actually doing something useful. It needs to flip, but that’s not what happens right now and that’s what worries me the most. It’s, you know, I don’t wanna get into details about some of the things we’ve been affiliated with for a brief, brief amount of time, but I do think that if they’re going to anybody.

Is going to give to a university to think hard about that and really figure out where your money is going. If it’s going to feed a a bunch of [00:19:00] paper pushers, maybe find another way to use those funds to push your products or your ideas forward. Output per dollar. Real output per dollar. Yeah, it’s gotta have.

Something come out of it that’s, if it’s public use, great. Publish it. And that’s the other thing too. I’m getting on my high horse here, but when they publish some of these things, they’re always buried in journals that cost a ton of money to, to even review the research, which I feel like to American taxpayer has probably paid for.

It’s much easier to get the research out of a European college or university than it is an American one. Strangely enough,

Joel Saxum: I saw a, a joke the other day online, and it was like, it was a, it was a research paper about, uh, the general public getting access to research, but it was behind a paywall. It’s bad,

Allen Hall: Joel.

It is really bad. I mean, you could easily pay well on some papers. Some of the lower cost ones are gonna be in a 20, $30 range. [00:20:00] It’s easy to get into the hundreds of dollars for a single research paper. And I kind of get it, except if it’s funded by the federal government. Those things should be just published.

You know, there’s a thing called Google. You can create a website, you can publish it. Google Scholars is a thing. You can publish it there. There’s a lot of ways to do this, which are free, but in ResearchGate is another one. There’s a lot of ways to do it that are free, but in order to get it to count, and a lot of the people that are doing the research are trying to get their PhDs.

In order for that to count, it has to be in, in a. Periodical, it’s gotta be reviewed by some people before. It can be blessed to be public knowledge at some level. It’s creates sort of the, a money changing or it creates a system that, uh, encourages. The selling of access. Let’s put it to you that way. Which [00:21:00] is unfortunate.

It doesn’t need to be that way. It didn’t used to be that way, but it is now.

Joel Saxum: And I think, I think there’s one thing too, to like monetizing or, or the capital markets monetizing ip, that’s one thing. But when it’s demo de, when we’re talking about de, we’re talking about democratizing research, not. Industry trade secrets or something of that sort.

Allen Hall: When I read about NRA projects, uh, like, oh, nras done this thing and I try to go find that paper and it’s in some publication that I have to go pay for, that just burns me.

Joel Saxum: It really burns me.

Allen Hall: Didn’t

Joel Saxum: I already pay for this in my tax bill?

Allen Hall: Yeah, pretty sure that I did, but now I gotta pay some random, uh, paper producing organization, uh, 30, 40, 50 bucks to get access to this paper, which.

Joel, you’re right. I have already paid for. There’s something not right with that system. Don’t let blade damage catch you off guard OGs. Ping sensors detect issues before they become expensive, time consuming problems from ice [00:22:00] buildup and lightning strikes to pitch misalignment and internal blade cracks.

Ping has you covered the cutting edge sensors are easy to install, giving you the power to stop damage before it’s too late. Visit eLog ping.com and take control of your turbine’s health today. Well, we’re almost reaching Terminator stage, Joel, with this open AI thing because there is concern about the AI models finding ways to cheat and to hide their reasoning, and it’s called reward hacking.

And OpenAI is saying, as AI becomes more sophisticated, uh, monitoring, controlling the system. The thing that they’re producing becomes increasingly challenging because it wants to find loopholes. Now my only question is you created this thing, I guess it’s got a mind of its own now, but it doesn’t. It’s a large.

Language model. It doesn’t have, uh, a [00:23:00] conscience, I wouldn’t say was, but, uh, or it doesn’t have a soul. Probably that’s another way to describe it. Uh, but it’s finding ways to cheat the system. ’cause it’s getting rewarded somehow. And my question is, well, one. What is rewarding? It mean? Like how does an AI system get happy?

Uh, what’s a dopamine hit here for some electrons? I don’t know. And second of all, how the heck are we gonna be able to know that it is. Telling you inaccuracies, and this is really troubling when it comes to things like software code engineering work. Like I was designing a building and I was using AI to do some calculations.

I would be really concerned about that. Is it actually doing the work that I think it’s doing, or is it just spitting out something to get you off? Because it’s, it’s, you’re using too many resources, right? It’d rather throw you ads about Amazon products than to tell you how to build

Joel Saxum: a building. I’m not an AI [00:24:00] expert, um, but I had a really good conversation last week.

So we did that, uh, we did that awesome webinar with Sky Specs, and when we were talking with them, we were talking with Dave Roberts, who’s the new CEO over there. And he brought up a term that I didn’t know and he said, agen ai, because of the last few years, it was like, you know, algorithmic things and generative ai, so gen ai and that was kinda the hot button thing.

Now, agen ai, that was a new concept for me. So I actually reached out to someone in my network, it’s uh, that is an AI actual expert. And I said, tell me what this syngen AI means. The difference with Agentic AI is, it’s like, it’s some, it’s an agent, right? It’ll do something for you. And so you can run it like, like generative ai, but it’s like the next level of generative ai.

But you can add that into any model and give it goals. Like if you’ve ever fi used the, um, Excel, there’s the find zero function. I love that one. It it for, for building business models and stuff, find zero is, is [00:25:00] fantastic. But it’s kind of like find zero on steroids, right? So you could tell it, I need you to do all of these calculations, but I also want you to, to do them to this goal.

Get me to this end goal. So like in Egen AI and win, you may say, run an AI algorithm based on this, this, this, this, and this. But the end goal is to get as many megawatt hours outta this wind farm as possible. This is, this is me talking in generalities, right? But that’s the thing, right? So now when you talk about.

What AI looks like for data centers, dollars spent on computing, dollars spent on cooling, dollars spent on power, which those ai, those large AI models, are gonna wanna run as efficiently as possible. So if you start to do some agentic AI things in there and say, do all of this, but exactly like you said, lower the cost of computing a little bit or whatever, then you’re gonna start to get this thing where it’s gonna start to, to kind of maybe cheat your answers a little bit to get to a more efficient.

[00:26:00] Compute state. I don’t know. Like I said, I’m not an AI expert,

Allen Hall: but it does make you think though, right? Joel? The way I think about it is when I ask perplexity or chat, GPT, one of these things, like, Hey, we just got a house and it has an induction cooktop. Okay. Which happened this morning, by the way, and it would not work with our pots and pans.

So I’m standing there like. Huh, this is not getting hot. And I can feel the stove pulse, like trying to see what I have stuck on top of it. And clearly I’ve made some human error. I thought, okay, I’ll go look that up to see what’s wrong. And, and, and perplexity said, Hey, you idiot. You can’t use aluminum cookware on these induction ranges.

Like, okay, I’ll take that for the, the loss. Human, human zero AI one. There you go. Now think in a bigger scope, like you were just saying, if I’m out [00:27:00] there trying to optimize a wind farm or to optimize a drive, train, or optimize anything that’s really complicated in engineering world. It doesn’t like to do that.

In fact, I went after, what’s the Google one? Um, Gemini, right. I tried to have Gemini do something that was fairly deep and it did process it. It wanted to process it and it wanted to sp out. Um, this significant amount of information, none of it really useful because I was looking for a specific, uh, research area within Lightning.

It’s esoteric to this discussion, but I was asking it to go find me this research in the world. And show me where these papers are that would talk about this one particular topic. And it just cranked and cranked and cranked and cranked. And I thought, you know what? It can’t be happy doing this. It’s going to want to dump me, which is [00:28:00] essentially what it did.

It just said, this is an interesting topic. Move along.

Joel Saxum: Yeah, you got you. You cost too much for this free service. Go away.

Allen Hall: Right? But it did it in a very, uh, unique way. It said a bunch of flowery things. This is this interesting subject. There’s been a lot of research. All these great things have happened, and then that was it.

And I, I think because of the amount of compute time it takes to do so many things, particularly complicated, engineering, technical work, even software, I think would be a problem. Will it always produce results? And I’ve tried some of the software pieces, like write me some code in C to do X or C plus plus to do this thing or in a Python to do this thing.

And it has been sketchy at best. It’s like 80% of the way there, but it doesn’t really work. And it, and you tell it, Hey, it has this problem. And then it goes, yeah, I have this problem. Let me retry it. Recode this again. You’re like, well you should have got it right the [00:29:00] first time kind of problem, right?

That’s recycling and re reasoning and rethinking that through has got to be eating up so much compute time and that there must be an incentive that they’re building in to get around that.

Joel Saxum: Here’s where we are though, so technically, okay, so I know Gemini Chat, GPT, Claude, all these, these things. I use Grok quite often.

Grok is cool because if it’s, if it’s chugging, there’s a little button on it. If you’re using it on your lap, on a desktop or laptop, whatever, on a browser. There’s a little button that says, see how I’m thinking? If it’s chugging away, and you could click on it and it will run you through like the processes that it’s doing to try to find your information, which is pretty cool.

But either way, at the end of the day, all of these things that we are using to kind of optimize our daily workflow, right? They’re not enterprise level. Right. So the one that scares me is if, if when we’re talking about this and go like. Well, what about the, the units that are using, like, I’m sure there’s something in, um, you know, fusion 3D that can [00:30:00] run AI algorithms on, on, I, I’m not saying, I’m sure, I know there is in engineering software to optimize the design.

I don’t want that design taking shortcuts, but, uh, but to, to make, to make the, uh, the, to general public feel safer about this concept, that AI expert I was talking to. He said this is the biggest difference that the public doesn’t see is that enterprise AI is a different story. Enterprise AI is, that’s what’s driving your, you know, the big data centers and stuff.

It’s enterprise ai, it’s not chat GPT and stuff like that’s, that’s not huge load on them compared to what some of these other things are. So when you get to that level where you’re integrating some kind of enterprise. AI for writing code, doing engineering work, these kind of things. It’s a different story.

We’re talking, you know, us playing football in the backyard to the NFL.

Allen Hall: I do think all the AI that’s being used to process, uh, video clips and make the people into Muppets is [00:31:00] time well spent. I’d tell you what, that’s scary. It’s insane. I think about how much compute are we doing to make this little video, 32nd video person talking into a Muppet.

Why are we

Joel Saxum: spending compute time on that? I saw one the other day that someone had sent me that was a, uh, an AI generated video of someone jumping off of a wind turbine and then turning into an eagle and like flying away and it looked freaking real. Like, I was like, man, is it CGI like who made this video?

I was like, no, this is literally like a prompt in a generative AI thing for a video. I was like, this is crazy.

Allen Hall: But again, it goes back like, why do we need that when we. We’re having some real

Joel Saxum: engineering or economic problems. The wind farmer this week, this week is the Strauss Wind Farm, which is over by Phil’s house.

Phil’s not here with us this week, but this one is right up the coast from Santa Barbara. It’s in Lompoc, California. This is the first wind farm on the coastline [00:32:00] of California. And because of this, uh, of course we wanted to make sure they did everything right. This is a bay wall wind farm. Uh, so part of the wind farm is it’s absolutely beautiful.

If you get a chance, go on the Bewa website and look at the video. Uh, but there’s an, there’s extreme protections for local, environmental and cultural resources, uh, associated with this wind farm. I’m gonna walk through, uh, one kind of example of it, but these are also some interesting turbines. It’s 27 ge, 3.8, 1 37 meter rotor turbines.

It’s 102.6 megawatts total. But an interesting thing, so we just talked about a bunch of things about ai. They’re actually going to use the ly ai system on this wind farm to see different kind of birds and raptors in the area. Uh, and because they were, are taking high considerations for wildlife, they’re doing feasibility studies about painting wind turbine blades, which we’ve heard about up in Wyoming and from Sweden.

I think it was. Um, they’re also doing excessive [00:33:00] monitoring for golden eagles. Uh, they’re doing a bunch of walk down studies, um, and then there is a, they’re also proposing something that I’ve never heard of. Um, it’s called Bird Guard Super Pro Amp, which is an auditory transmission thing gonna be installed around some of the turbines that basically when they sense a bird in the area, we’ll emit very loud auditory tones to push the birds or raptors, um, out of the area.

So. They’ve gone really deep into this thing for, uh, environmental protections, uh, and, uh, applaud that for bewa to make sure that they’re, uh. Being good stewards of the land. So the Strauss Wind Farm there in lopa, California, you are the Wind Farm of the week.

Allen Hall: That’s gonna do it for this week’s Uptime Wind Energy podcast.

Thanks for listening, and please give us a five star rating on your podcast platform and subscribing the Sun notes below to Uptime Tech News, our Substack newsletter. If you see an American wandering around Wind Europe loss, that will be me. So just come by and say hi, [00:34:00] and we’ll see you here next week on the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast.

https://weatherguardwind.com/vattenfall-ai-learns-cheat/

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Ten months after it was issued, the latest federal rule on transmission is mostly theoretical

Published

3 weeks ago

on

April 7, 2025

By

At a March 25 meeting convened by the Southeastern Regional Transmission Planning organization (SERTP), a large group of people met—as they do four times a year—to discuss the region’s power needs and whether the grid needs to be expanded to accommodate them.

As the meeting began, SERTP issued an increasingly common directive to those of us in attendance: We will not be discussing Order 1920, so don’t bother asking.

Some background on what this means may be important.

While most grid planning in the southeast is done by utilities within their own footprints, SERTP was created in response to a 2010 order from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) aimed at increasing the number of high-voltage power lines going across state boundaries and between utilities. These transmission lines are like highways for electricity: they may not be organically built by local communities, but they are essential to moving things at high volume.

A slow start

SERTP has never built or even planned a regional transmission line in more than a decade of its existence. Last year, FERC issued another rule, Order 1920, to address this ongoing failure of regional transmission.

SACE has previously broken down the details of Order 1920. The order requires utilities to start planning over a longer time horizon (20 years) and consider a number of potential benefits of new power lines that are left out of current analyses. (These include mitigation of extreme weather events, reduced energy loss on the lines, and a number of other virtues of having more space for power on the grid.)

As SACE has previously written, utilities in the Southeast have yet to announce any plans to comply with Order 1920 and have made several procedural moves to delay the deadline for legal compliance. The most recent and significant of these is SERTP’s request—now granted by FERC—to extend the deadline by a year, to June 2026.

Holding a meeting is not the same thing as taking action

What SERTP has been doing to prepare for Order 1920, and what it will do with the additional time it now has, is something of a mystery. According to the extension request it filed with FERC, SERTP’s efforts thus far have included “extensive working group meetings” between its member utilities (Duke, Southern Company, Dominion Energy, and others) as well as “outreach to neighboring regions.” 

The output of these conversations is not known to SACE or to the public. Since Order 1920 was issued, SERTP has declined to address it in any of its stakeholder meetings, except for two:

  1. An “educational session” on December 6th, 2024, which broke down the requirements included in Order 1920 but provided no information about what SERTP was doing to meet them. 
  2. A “stakeholder engagement meeting” held on January 29th of this year, in which regional nonprofit groups and other stakeholders were invited to offer feedback and suggestions on what SERTP might do to improve regional transmission. SERTP members made it clear during the course of this meeting that they were there only to listen and would not be taking questions.

It is, of course, possible that the conversations held between the utilities who run SERTP have been deep and substantive. But the extension request paperwork—which is the only information available to anyone outside of the utilities themselves—indicates that a number of critical decisions have yet to be made. Among the things these utilities have not decided are:

  • whether or not new software will be needed to examine the benefits of new power lines
  • who might supply that software, if needed, and for what price
  • what new planning procedures might be needed to meet the new federal standards
  • how those new planning procedures might be integrated with current ones

If these relatively fundamental questions remained undecided after more than six months of conversations among the member utilities, it’s fair to ask what has been decided. But stakeholders have been advised not to ask, and in any case, no answers have been given.

Holding meetings is not the same thing as listening

The community of advocates has been more than willing to offer ideas for what these processes might look like. Utilities outside the southeast, particularly those in the region known as MISO, have developed planning processes that meet many of the Order 1920 standards. We know that SERTP is aware of this because we presented it to them in some detail at the stakeholder engagement meeting. 

At the March 25th meeting earlier this week, I asked SERTP when, if ever, the stakeholders might hear back about the suggestions we have already shared. They offered no promise that we would get such an explicit reply and added that future stakeholder meetings may be delayed.

In fact, holding meetings is not necessarily anything

SERTP is within its legal rights to behave this way. Its meetings occur on schedule, its papers are in order, and the entity that regulates it—FERC—has given its blessings. But fifteen years after SERTP was formed to plan regional transmission, it cannot claim sole responsibility for a single new pole in the ground. 

Transmission can be arcane, but it matters. A well-planned and coordinated regional grid can be the difference between a manageable monthly bill and a shocking one; between a system that crashes in extreme weather and one that keeps people from shivering at home on Christmas Eve; and most starkly, between a livable climate and a hostile one. At some point, if we want these things, another meeting is not going to do the trick. Someone’s got to pick up a shovel and start to dig.

The post Ten months after it was issued, the latest federal rule on transmission is mostly theoretical appeared first on SACE | Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.

Ten months after it was issued, the latest federal rule on transmission is mostly theoretical

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com