Connect with us

Published

on

Weather Guard Lightning Tech

BOEM Offshore Lease Cancelled, Gulf Offshore Technology Methods

BOEM has cancelled its Gulf of Mexico offshore wind lease auction due to lack of interest. We explore why companies are hesitant to put turbines in the gulf, examining challenges and opportunities for wind projects in Texas and Louisiana from both financial and technical perspectives. Phil and Rosemary discuss downwind turbine designs for hurricane-prone areas and the complex economics of wind energy projects in the region. Our Wind Farm of the Week is the farm built for the 2018 Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang, South Korea, showcasing the potential of wind energy on a global stage.

Register for the AMI Wind Turbine Blades Event!

Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly email update on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary Barnes’ YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!

Pardalote Consulting – https://www.pardaloteconsulting.com
Weather Guard Lightning Tech – www.weatherguardwind.com
Intelstor – https://www.intelstor.com

Allen Hall: Have you seen the Oscar Mayer Wienermobile up close, Joel? Have you been around that thing?

Joel Saxum: I have, I’ve actually sat in it and I think I know where this story is going.

Allen Hall: I been up close to it and I don’t remember where it must have been an automobile museum and to the peanut mobile Which is another engineering marvel not seen that I saw them both driving down a highway one day I thought man either I’m really tired Strange vehicles on the road today But the wiener mobile flipped over outside of Chicago, did you see that It looked like a, did it look like somebody fell asleep and hit one of those concrete barriers that you can always find in Chicago?

Joel Saxum: My thought was, I was actually joking with a friend about it, is cause I’m from Wisconsin, so there’s this rivalry between Chicago and the people in Wisconsin. And it was brats versus the all, the all beef hot dogs in Chicago that they make the Chicago dogs. And they’re saying that they wanted to keep the Wienermobile in Chicago so much that they, someone actually sabotaged it. I don’t know, that’s probably not what happened, of course, but that was the joke.

Allen Hall: Is there a Bratmobile?

Joel Saxum: There’s not. I will tell you this, if you’d like to see some great American entertainment, tune into a Milwaukee Brewers game and watch the Sausage Race. And you will see hot dogs and brats, polishes.

Italian sausage. That’s the fourth one. Are these the four

food groups up in Wisconsin? Yes,

yes. Yes they are. Number five is cheese curds and number six is beer.

That rounds it out nicely. So the Wienermobile needs a little TLC based on the photos I’ve seen and they’re gonna have to put that thing back together.

That’s a hallmark of America, right? There’s things to be proud of. That’s one of them, man on the moon, Wienermobile.

I’m Allen Hall, and I’ll be joined by the rest of the Uptime host after these news headlines. In our first story, German wind turbine manufacturer Nordex is reporting a significant turnaround in its financial performance. For the first half of 2024, the company saw a dramatically reduced net loss of 12.6 million euros, a substantial improvement from the 298 million Euro loss reported in the same period last year.

This positive trend is further underscored by a 24.7% increase in sales reaching 3.43 billion euros. In light of these encouraging results, Nordics has revived its 2024 guidance upward now projecting an EBITDA margin between three and 4%. Amid these industry dynamics, the United Kingdom is making bold moves to accelerate its wind energy sector.

The British government has unveiled ambitious plans to support an additional 20 to 30 gigawatts of offshore wind by 2030. Central to this initiative is the creation of a new government owned energy company, aptly named Great British Energy.

Joel Saxum: This new entity will spearhead a public private partnership aimed at attracting up to 60 billion pounds in private investment. Completing these policy initiatives, the UK is also investing in critical infrastructure. Construction is underway for what will become the world’s largest monopile factory in Teesworths.

The 90 acre wind monopile factory represents a significant boost to the local economy with plans to create over 2, 000 jobs. This includes 1, 500 positions during the construction phase and 750 operational roles once the facility is fully functional in 2026.

Across the Irish Sea, Ireland is also recognizing the immense potential of offshore wind energy. A recent report has projected that if properly developed, Offshore wind could contribute a staggering 69 billion euros to Ireland’s economy by 2050. To fully capitalize on this opportunity, experts stress the need for strategic investments in port infrastructure and manufacturing capabilities.

In North America, an intriguing development is unfolding in St. John, New Brunswick, up in Canada. The virtual wind farm is making headlines by selling electricity to St. John Energy at less than half the price charged by the provincial utility. New Brunswick Power. This remarkable price difference has enabled St.

John Energy to achieve record profits and implement more modest rate increases for its customers. The success of this project could serve as a model for other municipalities looking to reduce energy costs and increase renewable energy adoption. And despite these positive developments, the wind industry continues to grapple with the challenge of intermittency.

Recent data from the United States highlights this issue showing that wind generation plummeted by 78 percent in July during a high demand. In response, power producers significantly increased their reliance on natural gas generation.

And in a groundbreaking development, energy giants Total Energies and RWE have joined forces to implement the innovative Oranje wind project in the Netherlands. The 795 megawatt offshore wind farm located 53 kilometers From the Dutch coast is set to become the country’s first system integration project in the wind sector.

What sets Oranje Wind apart is its comprehensive approach to energy system integration. The project aims to implement a range of flexible demand solutions including electrolyzers for green hydrogen production, smart chargers for electric vehicles, e boilers for heating, and even battery storage systems.

Additionally, Aranjawin will serve as a testbed for cutting edge offshore technologies, including floating solar farms and advanced energy storage solutions like seabed battery systems. Construction 2026, with full commissioning expected in early 2028. Once operational, Orange Wind will generate enough green electricity to power over 1 million Dutch households annually.

And that’s this week’s top news stories. After the break, I’ll be joined by my co host, Renewable Energy Expert and Founder of Pardalote Consulting, Rosemary Barn. CEO and Founder of IntelStor Phil Totaro. And the Chief Commercial Officer of Weather Guard, Joel Saxum. Mark your calendars for AMI’s Winter in Blades Conference happening October 2nd and 3rd in historic Boston, Massachusetts.

This two day event, which is similar to the well established edition in Europe, will bring together the whole blade value chain to examine market outlook, innovations in blade materials, design, manufacturing, testing, and lifecycle management. With a special focus on the North America market. Gain insights from experts from Vestas, Nordex, TPI, and DNV.

Along with scientists and engineers from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Plan your trip to Boston this fall by visiting the link in the show notes or just Google 2024 Blades Boston.

Allen Hall: Down in the Gulf of Mexico, Boehm has canceled a planned offshore wind lease for about 400, 000 acres of land. of Louisiana and Texas due to, of all things, lack of commercial interest. Only one company, RWE Offshore showed interest in the latest lease sale notice. And this contrasts with other auctions that have happened, particularly along the East Coast.

But despite the cancellation, BOEM received an unsolicited lease request from Hecate Energy Gulf Wind LLC for areas off the southeastern part of Texas. Okay. I bring this up because Joel and I were, our producer were just down in New Orleans right where this activity is planned to take place. And it does seem like if all the places in the United States you could put some decent wind in relatively inexpensively.

It is Texas and Louisiana because the infrastructure is there.

Joel Saxum: Yeah. We went and visited Gulf wind technologies this week and their facility is on, is in another facility, right? It’s an active port. The port is for the facility, the one we were on mile and a half long, it used to have over 26, 000 employees working at it every day.

They used to build ships here. It’s a deep water access, deep water port. We drove around in a truck key side up against the coffer dams. The size and scope of this thing is crazy, but they’re there and they have to this specific port we were at, or not, I wouldn’t call it a port, but Pacific facility we were at, they have brought in the cells.

They brought in over a hundred blades last year. When say the port of Houston didn’t have the capacity to bring these boats in and they have all the cranes, they have all the working stuff. Along that Gulf coast. All of the infrastructure that is needed for offshore wind is there. The people are there, the vessels are there, the support is there, and the people, and the local communities want the jobs.

So they’re all about it as well, right? So when we were sitting there talking with a lot of the Gulf wind people, it was like, they’ve been working on a holistic view under contract for a while about how to make the wind. Our wind energy in the Gulf of Mexico basically go forward, right?

In the most efficient way, in the most, in the safest way and the most cost effective way. The thirst is there, the capabilities are there, and you knock some hurdles down, right? When we’re, I think last fall, we talked about on the show, a deep water port being put in, or a deep water quayside being put in up in your neck of the woods, Alan, up in Massachusetts.

And it was like, seven different entities, everybody fighting over it, and you had to have this permission, and that permission, and this permission, it was delaying things and all they had to do was add a couple hundred meters of Causeway or something on the leg or to one end of a facility these facilities exist It’s literally just roll in and sign a contract to be able to pull your boats up.

So it’s there It’s ready to go. You know right now we have a lot of other wind Focus going on in the united states. There’s a ton of things going on the east coast There’s the west coast a lot of people paid a lot of money for auction. Lease You areas out there so money’s tied up all over the place and To be honest with you people are probably a little bit concerned about you know Just our political climate right now instead of spending money on more leases.

Allen Hall: So is it the financial risk that is limiting projects off of Texas and Louisiana or is more of a technical weather related risk?

Philip Totaro: It’s really Competition with, especially in the ear cot market where you have cheap onshore wind and solar PV that really negates the need for substantial capacity. Of offshore wind but as you mentioned, at the top of this with canceling this auction for additional lease areas. And this unsolicited bid by energy.

They are specifically trying to do a project that would be powered by offshore wind, but for hydrogen production. So this is not the only project that’s been proposed down in the Gulf for that purpose. But what’s interesting about it is Ahektae already has a 40 percent interest from Repsol, the Spanish oil and gas company Repsol, and Repsol’s now made an offer to take 100 percent control.

So there’s obviously some, investment looking to come in but there, a lot of the other Developers, the reason that frankly canceled this tender for the Gulf of Mexico, the 2nd round of the Gulf of Mexico was they received, I think, something like 25 different comments from some of the potential participants in the auction.

Who all indicated to Boehm that the market climate just isn’t right now and there have even been some, um, European utility companies or, sovereign wealth funds Ecuador, for example, in Norway. And one of their executives came out and said that they’re a little concerned about, you know, they frankly think if Trump wins, it’s going to be, the end of offshore wind in the U.

S. for a little while. The reality of that is if fear is going to hold people back from making that kind of an investment, Then I guess Boehm had to pull the plug, but there are still companies that are interested in those lease sites, it’s just that the use case is not necessarily supplying electricity the way most offshore wind is doing in the world right now, it would be for this kind of hydrogen application.

Where, you know, that hydrogen production facility would take the bulk of the power offtake and then a little bit might go into a merchant market.

Joel Saxum: It makes sense though, Phil, right? Have that kind of hybrid production usage ready, right? Because you’re in now, this is a completely different market, right?

When you talk about all the projects that are going on the Northeast part of the United States, they’re looking to secure a We secured a PPA for X amount of megawatt. And we know we’re gonna make that throughout the life of the project. If you’re shoot for shoving energy into the Ercot market, there’s times when the prices are peanuts, like you’re not making anything.

However, there’s also times when you’re , a couple years ago you’re making $9,000 a megawatt hour. So there’s if you’re gonna have a yeah. Backup production of hydrogen or a focus on hydrogen production makes sense. And then if you have the ability to flip the switch. When prices in that merchant market or cut go up, that could be attractive to someone.

However, right now it’s just it’s

Allen Hall: really risky, like you said. So it’s more of a longer term play then, right? Phil, is that what I’m hearing is that you need to have different, create different things with electricity. Rather than just feed the grid straight off, and green hydrogen would be one of them, of probably several.

Philip Totaro: If you’re gonna do a project in the Gulf of Mexico, given where demand is right now, and what Joel just mentioned, that in, in some cases you get negative pricing in ERCOT even if the offtake was going into, Louisiana and, Southwest Power Pool, et cetera, You’re still, it’s not that Southwest Power Pool is that much better at the moment, you’re still getting, somewhere around 30 a megawatt hour.

If you’re also getting the PTC, that obviously helps but the point being that I, I think a lot of project developers, yeah, like weather related risks, like you mentioned that’s kind of part of it, but it’s really the offtake situation. That’s what. Everybody’s really concerned about, having to build, a billion dollar offshore wind farm and a, at least, half a billion dollar transmission capability, substation and, export cables et cetera to be able to plug that into a market that’s already saturated with renewables.

That’s going to be, a hard sell in, in the near term.

Allen Hall: But Phil, wouldn’t you design it to be lower cost if you knew that was a constraint? You wouldn’t put a brand new 15 megawatt turbine out there and you wouldn’t put it out so far. You put it closer to shore so the cabling’s shorter. You may use a four or five megawatt turbine just for simplicity’s sake.

There’s a lot that goes into that though. It the model on the model on the East Coast right now is to put turbines further and further away from shore, which makes the cost go higher and higher because Construction costs go up, cabling goes up. Everything just gets more expensive for every kilometer you’re offshore.

Louisiana is talking about putting turbines within the three miles of their shoreline, so it’ll be state, what is considered state waters. Louisiana is the only one doing that. Does that then make the projects less expensive? Within the ppa price doesn’t matter so much

Philip Totaro: it does but also again keep in mind that this the power coming off anything in Louisiana would probably not go into your car to would be spp so it’s like I said it’s a little easier to justify but you’re still also talking about something where with.

interest rates still so high, it doesn’t matter necessarily how far away. Something closer to shore, shorter cables, etc. Yes, it makes it easier. It makes the foundations easier because the amount of pile doesn’t have to be so deep or the jacket, whatever it is. So that’s a consideration, but I don’t think it’s the governing factor of why Okay The developers don’t want to get into the Gulf of Mexico at this point.

I think they just look at the overall kind of economic picture and say to themselves, I don’t think this really makes sense when I could just go build a solar plant on shore or a wind farm. Onshore.

Allen Hall: So I, I think there’s two pieces to this, right? Obviously, as Phil’s pointed out, you get the financial piece, selling the power, where’s it gonna go?

All those financial constraints and the weather, right? But after the break, I wanna get Rosemary in here and talk about the technical issues about putting blades in these hurricane conditions because we had talked to Gulf Wind Technology. And learn a couple of things about how it could be done.

So after the break, let’s talk to Rosemary.

Joel Saxum: As busy wind energy professionals, staying informed is crucial and let’s face it difficult. That’s why the Uptime Podcast recommends PES Wind Magazine. PES Wind offers a diverse range of in depth articles and expert insights that dive into the most pressing issues facing our energy future.

Whether you’re an industry veteran or new to wind, PES Wind has the high quality content you need. Don’t miss out. Visit PESWind. com today.

Allen Hall: Well, Rosemary, after visiting Gulf Wind Technology down in New Orleans, we were really impressed, Joel and I, of all the things that were happening there. And one of the discussion points was, what do we do about hurricanes and the design of wind turbines?

We had some feedback about that, which we cannot disclose. We’re sworn to secrecy there. However, you’ve been looking into these hurricane turbines and what we call downwind turbines, which the blades are on the wrong side. And is there some update on that? Is it useful in hurricane conditions?

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah, maybe.

It’s one of the questions that I get asked a lot about. And I think one of my very first YouTube videos is about that. How do you design a wind turbine so the blades don’t hit the tower? So the way that a regular wind turbine is designed, the Blades are on the upward side of the tower. So as the wind blows the blade and it bends towards the tower.

So that’s one of the major design constraints when you’re designing the blades is they have to be stiff enough to not hit the tower, obviously. And yeah, smash into it while they’re rotating or in a strong gust of wind. But there’s a lot of interest in designing blades that are more flexible.

And one of the reasons for that is so that in strong storms, they wouldn’t need to be as, have as much material. If you don’t need to design it as stiff, you can use less material. Yeah, and so that, that is helpful in a strong storm. Because it’s challenging to put a normal wind turbine in an environment like that because the blades aren’t stiff enough to be sure that they’re never going to hit the tower.

And then there’s other reasons as well, why you might want a more flexible blade, like if you can make the blade more slender, which will skinnier blade, that will naturally make it less flexible, but there’s a lot of interest in doing that and having a higher tip spread ratio, you can get more efficiency and again, better performance in these extreme wind loads.

People did try, there are downwind designs out there and still today like small wind turbines are often made in a downwind design and you can make them so that they behave like a weather vane. They just naturally follow the wind. So that’s one benefit, but it really only works for small ones.

Back in the day, utility scale wind turbines were sometimes downwind, but it’s been a few decades since anyone did that seriously, because there were a few big design flaws associated or design challenges associated with the downwind design. And the major one is that Every time that the blade passes behind the tower, it goes from having the wind pushing it to all of a sudden having no wind pushing it.

And when the wind pushes a blade, it bends away from the wind. And then when it goes behind the tower, it suddenly springs back. And so that does two things. One, it makes a thump. Every time that the blade passes the tower, you go thump. And then the other thing that it does is it it, is challenging for the, those kinds of loads that are happening on the blade frequently.

Yeah, cause fatigue loading, fatigue damage of the blades. And that was hard to get around. But yeah, some researchers at NREL have been looking into ways to make more flexible blades. And this was the, downwind orientation is one of the really obvious ways that you can do that. So they thought.

We’re not going to go off data from the 80s and 90s that we had when people used to make big wind turbines that way. Let’s just take they’ve got a 1. 5 megawatt wind turbine, a test wind turbine at their disposal and they’re like, we’ll just flip it. So they just literally took the rotor off, turned it around, whacked it back on I guess change the polarity of the generator and maybe a couple of other little things.

But yeah, that, that’s what they did. So now it’s a downwind rotor. Yeah. And then they instrumented it up and tested how it went. And yeah, the TLDR is that downwind orientation is still a bad idea for the same reasons that it always has been, but now they have a lot more confidence in that it’s it’s ruled out a whole path of investigation that they were maybe going to go down.

And it is, I’m in two minds about this experiment. Cause it’s like on the one hand, like you probably could have predicted that was going to be the outcome. How many millions did they spend on it? But on the other hand, it’s it’s stopped them from, spending years engineering a perfect downwind turbine to, build a whole turbine and see what happens.

So I love these quick and dirty things of just, yeah just take what you’ve got. make it work. Now you don’t need to talk about that anymore. All of your, instead of, splitting your research team in two with half of them working on downwind rotors, now they’re all working on upwind and solving the next biggest uncertainty.

So yeah, it’s pretty cool. They also got a lot of information from the measurements that they took in terms of yeah, loads and strain, and they can use that to validate some of their models. Cause it’s really challenging to model. The aerodynamics and the blade structure, how they interact together, especially in these kinds of challenging environments where you’ve got, disturbed blow.

Yeah, so they’ll get a lot of learning from that as well. So yeah, I think it’s not so much it’s easy to just look at it and go, what a waste of millions of dollars. But I think that there was a lot of learning that happened And, worthwhile thing to do.

Allen Hall: Why don’t we have paddle turbines?

They’re not efficient. No, I know they’re not efficient, but we’re talking about Like a water wheel. Yeah,

Philip Totaro: You have a steamship. Barrel, like a horizontal orientation barrel.

Rosemary Barnes: You can half your efficiency that way. I

Philip Totaro: like to do

Allen Hall: that. You put a blade on either side, right?

Bounce it out.

Rosemary Barnes: No, just the drag type device is inherently half as efficient, roughly, as A lift type device that’s just, yeah, they’re aerodynamics. You can only go as fast as the wind when you’ve got drag pushing your turbine around. What compared to, yeah, a lot faster from having lift on your side.

Allen Hall: Yeah. But we’ve seen all kinds of other types of turbines, not only downwind recently, but if it’s going to keep the turbine operational where it’s not going to break or tear itself apart, why would you not look at. Other things, or why wouldn’t NREL be investigating things that could possibly work, especially since if I was going to go with a downwind turbine, I would call Rosemary or somebody that knows what they’re talking about and say, is this even possible?

And the answer would be no. Don’t do it, which I think is what Rosemary would tell me. It is possible.

Rosemary Barnes: They did it.

Allen Hall: They did it. I know they did it, but they got the output that you would have told them about two years ago.

Rosemary Barnes: No, I’m all for that, like periodically reassessing if the, assumptions that you’ve been making for the last few decades, if they’re still valid, because things have changed a lot since the 80s and 90s.

I think it’s fair to revisit. I think that they learnt a lot, and I don’t know the exact we’ve got to wait for the full paper to be written up, but so I don’t know the exact deal breakers that led them to their conclusion, but I would expect that none of them are insurmountable, that, you could, with enough money thrown at it, you could make a perfectly reliable and efficient downwind wind turbine these days, and that it would cost more than the the standard arrangement, And that’s the other thing.

We can already make hurricane proof wind turbines if you just want to throw materials at it, basically, put twice as much carbon fiber and make it make it twice as stiff, then there you go. You got a hurricane proof wind turbine. But the problem is that then it costs so much more that you would, no one would ever actually want to build a project with those turbines.

That’s where we’re at. It’s always the, like we talk about it, like engineering Oh, can we solve this technical problem or that technical problem? But the true answer is 99 percent of the time. It’s like engineers could do it, but it wouldn’t be cost effective. So you wouldn’t. And I think that’s where we’re at with this as well.

Joel Saxum: That’s the same conversation, Alan, we had with all the SMEs at Gulf Wind Technology this week is building that problem statement at the beginning and understanding the economics of it before you get into the engineering of it. Because if it doesn’t make sense economically let’s not waste the time to build or design something like this.

And Rosemary, I got to tell you something, and this is from someone who doesn’t have that many gray hairs. I’m embarrassed to say I actually had to look up what TLDR meant because I didn’t know what it meant. Oh my god.

Rosemary Barnes: Oh my

Philip Totaro: god, Joel! Joel’s like Dr. Evil in Austin Powers, he’s I’m with it, I’m hip, and then starts dancing the Macarena.

Exactly, sharks with freaking laser beams on their heads.

Joel Saxum: One million dollars. If you’ve been watching any kind of news, and or if you’re on social media, or however you get your news, you’ll see that the Olympics are going on in Paris right now. So in honor of the ongoing Olympics in Paris, I’m going to throw it back a couple years to 2018.

When the Olympics were in Pyeongchang, South Korea, so that was Winter Olympics, so not the Summer Olympics. But at those Summer or Winter Olympics in South Korea, a wind farm was built to power the Olympics. There, the wind farm that was built to power the Olympics was 203 megawatts during the games and this was a hundred and four percent of the energy required to power them So it the South Koreans when they put this plan together they were creating the most green Olympics and wanted to make that a Kind of a flagship for the rest of the games as they move forward only one bad thing happened with the wind there and it didn’t have anything to do with the wind farm but the wind was so extreme on some of the outdoor events that there was actually, they got canceled or they got delayed.

And there was actually some issues with the wind blowing so hard up on the mountains in South Korea. But the the Olympic wind turbines outside of Pyeongchang, South Korea, in the province of Gangwon, you are our wind farm of the week.

Allen Hall: That’s going to do it for this week’s Uptime Wind Energy podcast.

Thanks for listening. Please give us a five star rating on your podcast platform and subscribe in the show notes below to Uptime Tech News. Our weekly newsletter, which is now on Substack. And you can check out Rosemary’s YouTube channel, Engineering with Rosie, and we’ll see you here next week on the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast.

/po

https://weatherguardwind.com/boem-offshore-lease-gulf-offshore-technology/

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Boycott Amazon

Published

on

At left are a few good reasons not to shop from Amazon.

I use eBay, so as not to make this world an even worse place than it is now.

Boycott Amazon

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Vineyard Wind’s $69.50 PPA, Two Offshore Lease Exits

Published

on

Weather Guard Lightning Tech

Vineyard Wind’s $69.50 PPA, Two Offshore Lease Exits

Rosemary reports back on her visit to multiple Chinese renewable energy companies, Vineyard Wind activates a $69.50/MWh PPA with Massachusetts utilities, and Bronze Age jewelry halts a German wind project.

Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly newsletter on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on YouTube, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary’s “Engineering with Rosie” YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!

[00:00:00] The Uptime Wind Energy Podcast brought to you by Strike Tape protecting thousands of wind turbines from lightning damage worldwide. Visit strike tape.com and now your hosts.

Allen Hall 2025: Welcome to the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast. I’m your host, Allen Hall. I’m here with Yolanda Padron in Austin, Texas, who is back from the massive wedding event. Everybody’s super happy about that, and Rosemary Barnes had her own adventures. She just got back from China and Rosemary. You visited a a lot of different places inside of China.

Saw some cool factories. What all happened?

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah, it was really cool. I went over for an influencer event. So if you are maybe, you know, in the middle of your career, not, not particularly attractive or anything you might have thought influencer was ruled out for you as a career. No one, no one needs engineering influencers in their [00:01:00] forties.

It’s incorrect. It turns out that’s, that’s where, that’s where I, I found myself. It was pretty cool. I, I did get the red carpet rolled out for me. Many gifts. I had to buy a second bag to bring home the gifts, and when I say I had to buy a second bag, I had to mention. Oh, I have so many gifts, I’m gonna need another bag.

And then there was a new bag presented to me about half an hour later. But, so yeah, what did I do? I got to, um, as I was over there for a Sun Grow event. Huge, huge event. They, um, it’s for, it’s for their staff a lot, but it’s also, they also bring over partners. They also bring over international experts to talk about topics that are relevant to them.

Yeah. They gave everybody factory tours in, um, yeah, in, in shifts. Um, I got to see a module assembly factory, so where they take cells, which are like, I don’t know, the size of a small cereal box, um, and assemble them into a whole module. Then the warehouse, warehouse was [00:02:00] gigantic. It, um, was, yeah, 1.8 gigawatt hours worth of cells that couldn’t hold in that one building.

They’re totally obsessed with fire safety there in everything related to batterie, like in the design of the product, but also in, in the warehouse. And they do, yeah, fire drills all the, all the time. Some of them quite big and impressive. Um, I saw inverter manufacturing facility that was really cool.

Heaps of robots. Sw incredibly fast. Saw a test facility.

Allen Hall 2025: So was most of the manufacturing, robotics, or humans?

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah. So at the factory it was like anything that needed to be done really fast or with really good quality was done by robots. So they had, um, you know, pick and place machines putting in. Um, you know, components in the circuit board, like just insane, insane rate.

I’m sure it’s quite, quite normal, but, um, just very fast. Everything lined up in a row. Most of their quality control is done by robots. Um, so it does well it’s done by ai, I should say. [00:03:00] Taking photos of, of things and then, um, AI’s interpreting that. Repairs, I think were done by humans. There were humans doing, um, like custom components as well.

Like not every product is exactly the same. So the custom stuff was done by humans.

Allen H: So that’s the Sun Grove facility, right? You, but you went to a couple of different places within China?

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah, I went to another, a factory, a solar panel, a factory, um, from Longie. That was really cool too. I got to see a bit more probably of the, um, interesting, interesting stuff there, like, uh, a bit more.

Um, yeah, I don’t, I dunno, processes that aren’t, aren’t so obvious. Not just assembly, but um, you know, like printing on, um, bus bars and, you know, all of the different connections and yeah, it was a bit, a bit more to it in what I saw. Um, so that was, but it, it’s the same, you know, as humans are only involved when it’s a little bit out of the.

Norm or, um, where they’re doing repairs, actual actually re [00:04:00]repairing. You know, the robots or the AI is identifying which components don’t meet the standard and then they’ll go somewhere where a human will come and, um, fix them.

Allen H: Being the engineer there. Did you notice where the robots are made? Was everything made in China that was inside the factory or were they bringing in outside?

Technology.

Rosemary Barnes: I didn’t think to look for that, but I would assume that it was Chinese made, also

Allen H: all built in country

Rosemary Barnes: 20 years ago that wouldn’t have been the case, but I think that China has had a long, a long time to, to learn that. Again, it’s not like, it’s not, it’s not rocket science. These are, these are pick and place machines, you know, like I remember working on a project very early in my career, so.

Literally 20 years ago, um, I was working with pick and place machines. It’s the same, it’s the same thing. Um, some of them are bigger ’cause they’re, you know, hauling whole, um, battery packs around. It’s just the, um, the way that it’s set up, but then also the scale that they can achieve. You just, you can’t make things that cheap if you don’t have the [00:05:00] scale to utilize everything.

A hundred percent. Like I said, wind turbine towers is a really good example. ’cause anyone, any steel fabricating

Allen H: shop

Rosemary Barnes: could make a wind turbine tower. Right? They, they could, they could do that. You know, the Chinese, um, wind turbine tower factories have the exact right machine. They don’t have a welder that they also use for welding bits of bridges or whatever.

Uh, they have the one that does the exact kind of world that they need, um, for the tower. They, you know, they do that precisely. Robotically, uh, exactly the same. And, you know, a, a tower section comes on, they weld it, it moves off to the next thing, and then a new one comes on. They’re not trying to move things around to then do another weld in the same machine.

You know, like they’re, um, but the exact right. Super expensive machine for the job costs a whole bunch to set up a factory. And then you need to be making multiple towers every single day out of that factory to be able to recoup on your cost. And so that is [00:06:00] the. The, um, bar that is just incredibly hard slash impossible for, um, other countries to clear.

Allen H: Can I ask you about that? Because I was watching a YouTube video about Tesla early on Tesla, where they wanted to bring in a lot of robotics to make vehicles and that they felt like that was the wrong thing to do. In fact, they, they, they kinda locked robots in and realized that this is not the right way to do it.

We need to change the whole process. It was a big deal to kind of pull those. Specialized piece of equipment, robots out and to put something else in its place in that they learned, you know, the first time, instead of deciding on a process, putting it in place and then trying to turn it on, see if it works, was to sort of gradually do it.

But don’t bolt anything down. Don’t lock it in place such that it doesn’t feel like it’s permanent. So you engineer can think about removing it if it’s not working. But it sounds like this is sort of the opposite approach of. A highly specialized [00:07:00] machine set in place permanently to produce. Infinite amounts of this particular product, does that then restrict future changes and what they can make or, I, I, how do they see that?

Did, did you talk about that? Because I think that’s one of an interesting approaches.

Rosemary Barnes: I didn’t actually get as much chances I would’ve liked to speak to engineers. Um, I was talking mostly to salespeople and installers. Um, so they know a lot, but I couldn’t, um, like in the factory tours, I was asking questions.

Um. That kind of question and, and they could answer all, all that. Um, but outside of that, and I couldn’t record in the factory obviously. Um, but I did, I did take notes, but what I would say is that they would have a separate facility where they would be working out the details of new products and new manufacturing processes and testing them out thoroughly before they went and, you know, um, installed everything correctly.

But what I do hear is that, you know, especially with solar power. Maybe to [00:08:00] batteries to a lesser extent. You, you know, you like, you have these kind of waves of technology. Um, so you know, like everyone’s making whatever certain type of solar cell and then five years later, um, there’s a new more efficient configuration and everybody’s making that.

And I know that there are a lot of factories that kind of get scrapped. Um, and the way that China’s set up their, like, you know, their economy around all this sort of thing is set up is that it’s not that, like every company doesn’t succeed. Right. They SGO was a big exception because they’ve been going since 1997, I think it was.

It was started by a professor quid his job and hired a room across the, across the road from his old university and, you know, built his first inverter and, um, you know, ’cause he, he could see that. Uh, the grid was gonna have to change to incorporate all of the solar power that was coming, which to be honest, in 1997, that was like pretty, pretty farsighted.

That was not obvious to me when I started working in solar in mid two thousands. And it was not obvious to me that this was a winner.

Allen H: Well, has sun grow evolved then quite a bit? ’cause if you’re [00:09:00] saying that they’ve minimized the cost to produce any of their products by the use of robotics, they have been through an evolutionary process.

You didn’t see any of the previous generations of. Factories. You, you were just seeing the most modern factory that that’s actually producing parts today. So is that a, is that a, is that just a cost mindset that’s going on in China? Like, we’re just gonna produce the lowest cost thing as fast as we can, or is it a market penetration approach?

What are, what were, were the engineers in management saying about that?

Rosemary Barnes: I think there’s a few different aspects to that, like within China. So Sun Grow is the big company with a long track record and they’re not making the cheapest product out of China. So I think that they are still trying to make the cheapest product, but they’re not thinking about it just in the purchase price.

Right. They’re thinking more in terms of the long, long term. You know, they’ve been around for 30 years and probably expect to be around for another 30 years. They don’t wanna be having [00:10:00] recalls of their products and you know, like having to, um. Installers in particular are probably working with them because they know that they won’t have to go back and do rework and the support is good and all that sort of thing.

So they’re spending so much money on testing and you know, just getting everything exactly right. But I don’t think that that’s the only way that China is doing it. There’s, you know, dozens, probably hundreds of companies. Um. Doing similar stuff between Yeah, like solar panels and associated stuff like inverters and, and batteries.

So many companies and all of them won’t succeed. You know, sun Girls Facility in, I was in her and it’s huge, you know, it’s like a, a medium sized country town. Just their, um, their campus there, they’re not, they’re not scrapping that and moving to a new site, you know, they’re gonna be. Rejiggering and I would expect that, you know, like everything’s set up exactly the way it needs to be, but it’s not like gigantic machines.[00:11:00]

It’s not like setting up a wind turbine blade factory where it’s hard if you designed it for 40 meter blades, you can’t suddenly start making 120 meter blades. Like it’s, they will be able to be sliding machines in and out as they need to. Um, so I, I, yeah, I guess that it’s some, some flexibility. But not at the cost of making the product correctly.

Allen H: Did you see wind turbines while you were in China?

Rosemary Barnes: I, the only winter I saw, I actually, I saw, because I caught the train from Shanghai, I actually caught the fast train from Shanghai to, which is about, it depends which one you get between like an hour 40 or three hours if it stops everywhere. Um, and I did see a couple of wind turbines on the way there, out the window, just randomly like a wind turbine in the middle of a, a town.

Um, so that was a bit, a bit interesting. But then in the plane, on the way back, the plane from Shanghai to Hong Kong, I, at the window I saw a cooling tower of some sort. So either like a, yeah, some kind of thermal [00:12:00] power plant. And then. Around all around, well, wind turbines, so onshore wind turbines. So I don’t know.

Um, yeah, I, I don’t know the story behind that, but it’s also not a particularly windy area, right? Like most of the wind in China is, um, to the west where, uh, I wasn’t

Allen H: as wind energy professionals, staying informed is crucial, and let’s face it. That’s why the Uptime podcast recommends PES Wind Magazine. PES Wind offers a diverse range of in-depth articles and expert insights that dive into the most pressing issues facing our energy future.

Whether you’re an industry veteran or new to wind, PES Wind has the high quality content you need. Don’t miss out. Visit PS win.com today. So there are two stories out of the US at the minute that really paint a picture of the industry. It was just being pulled in opposite directions. The Department of Interior announced agreements to terminate two more.

Offshore wind leases, uh, [00:13:00] Bluepoint wind and Golden State wind have agreed to walk away from their projects. Global Infrastructure Partners, which is part of BlackRock, will invest up to $765 million in a liquified natural gas facility instead of developing blue point wind. Ah. And Golden State Wind will recover approximately $120 million in lease fees after redirecting investment to oil and gas projects along the Gulf Coast, and both companies say they will not pursue further offshore wind development in the United States.

Well, we’ll see how that plays out. Right? Meanwhile. In Massachusetts Vineyard Wind, which has been fighting with GE Renova recently has activated its long awaited power purchase agreement with three utilities. The contract set a fixed electricity price of drum roll please. [00:14:00] $69 and 50 cents per megawatt hour for the first year and a two and a half percent annual increase.

Uh, state officials say the agreements will save rate payers $1.4 billion over 20 years. So $69 and 50 cents per megawatt hour is a really low PPA price for offshore wind. A lot of the New York projects that. Renegotiated we’re somewhere in the realm of 120 to $130 a megawatt hour, and there’s been a lot of discussion in Congress about the, the usefulness of offshore wind.

It’s intermittent blahdi, blahdi, blah. Uh, but the, the big driver is what costs too much. In fact, it doesn’t cost too much. And because it’s consistent, particularly in the wintertime, uh, electricity prices in Massachusetts in the surrounding area are really high. ’cause of the demand and ’cause how cold it is that this offshore wind project, vineyard wind would be a huge rate saving.

And [00:15:00] actually the math works out the math. Math everybody. Do you think this is, when we go back five years from now, look back at this. This vineyard wind project really makes sense for Massachusetts.

Yolanda Padron: I think it really makes sense for Massachusetts. I’m really interested to know what the asset managers are thinking on the vineyard wind side, um, and if they’re scared at all to take this on.

I mean, it’s great and I’m sure they can absolutely deliver. Like generation I don’t think should be an issue. Um. I just don’t know. It’s, it sounds like they’re leaving a lot of money on the table.

Allen H: I would say so, yeah. But remember, the vineyard win was one of the early, uh, agreements made when things were, this is pre Ukraine war, pre Iran conflict on a lot of other, a lot of other things.

It was pre, so I remember at the time when this was going on that. P. PA prices were higher than obviously a lot of other [00:16:00] things. Onshore solar, onshore wind, it would, offshore is always more expensive, but I don’t remember $69 popping up anywhere in any filing that I remember seeing. So even if they had said $69 five years ago, I think that would’ve still been like, wow, that’s pretty good for an offshore wind project.

And now it looks fantastic for the state of Massachusetts

Yolanda Padron: because I know that there’s sometimes, and we’ve talked about this in the past, right? There are sometimes projects where, you know, you think you, you’ve got a really good price and you’re really excited about it, and then it goes into operation and then like a couple years down the road, prices increase quite a bit and it’s not the worst thing in the world.

But you do just kind of think a little bit like, I wish I could. Renegotiate this or you know, just to get, to get our team a bit of a better deal or to get a bit more money in operations and everything.

Allen H: Does this play into Vineyard wind claiming $850 [00:17:00] million in dispute with GE Renova that at $69 PPA, there’s not a lot of profit at the end of this and need to get the money out of GE Renova right now, and maybe why GE Renova wants to get out of this because they realize.

The conflict that is coming that they need to separate the, the themselves from this project. It’s, it’s very, as an asset manager, Yoland, as you have done this in the past, would you be concerned about the viability of the project going forward, or is all the upfront costs. Pretty much done in that operationally year to year.

It’s, it’s not that big of a deal.

Yolanda Padron: As an asset manager taking this on, I’d probably have started preparation on this project a lot earlier than other of my projects like I do. I know that usually there’s, you know, we’ve talked about the different teams, right, throughout the stages of the project until it goes into operations, [00:18:00] but.

And usually you don’t have a lot of time to prepare to, to make sure all of your i’s are dotted and t’s are crossed, um, by the time you take the project and operations from a commercial standpoint. But this project, I think would absolutely, like you, you would need to make sure that a lot of the, of the things that you’re, that might be issues for some of your projects like aren’t issues for this project.

Just to make sure at least the first few years you can. You can avoid a lot of, a lot of turmoil that the pricing and the disputes and the technical issues are gonna cause you, because I feel like it’s just, there’s, there’s just so many things that just keep this side, just keeps on getting hit, you know?

Allen H: Well, I, I guess the question is from my side, Yolanda, is obviously inflation, when this project started was pretty consistent, like one point half, 2%. It was very flat for a long time. And interest rates, if you remember when this project started, were very, very low. Almost [00:19:00] nonexistent, some interest rates.

Now that’s hugely different. How does a contract get set up where a vineyard can’t raise prices? It would just seem to me like you would have to tie some of the price increase to whatever the inflation rate is for the country, maybe even locally, so that if there were a, a war in Ukraine or some conflict in the Middle East.

That you, you would at least be able to, to generate some revenue out of this project because at some point it becomes untenable, right? You just can’t afford to operate it anymore. And,

Yolanda Padron: and I think, um, I, I haven’t, I obviously haven’t read the, the contracts themselves, but I know that there’s sometimes there, it’s pretty common for a PPA to have some sort of step up year by year.

And it’s usually, it can be tied to, um, the CPI for. Like the, the change in CPI for the year to year. So you’re [00:20:00] absolutely like, right, like maybe, I mean, hopefully they’re, they’re not just tied to the fixed 69 bucks per megawatt hour. Um, but, but yeah, to, to your point like that, that price increase could, could really save them.

Now that we’re, we’re talking the, the increase in, in inflation right now and foreseeable future,

Allen H: if you think about what electricity rates are up in the northeast. I think I was paying 30 cents a kilowatt hour, which is 300. Does that sound right? $300 a megawatt hour. Delivered at the house, something like that.

Right? So

Yolanda Padron: prices in the northeast are crazy to me,

Allen H: right? They’re like double what they are in North Carolina. Yeah.

Delamination and bottom line failures and blades are difficult problems to detect early. These hidden issues can cost you millions in repairs and lost energy production. C-I-C-N-D-T are specialists to detect these critical flaws [00:21:00]before they become expensive burdens. Their non-destructive test technology penetrates deep dip blade materials to find voids and cracks.

Traditional inspections completely. Miss C-I-C-N-D-T Maps Every critical defect, delivers actionable reports and provides support to get your blades. Back in service, so visit cic ndt.com because catching blade problems early will save

Yolanda Padron: you millions.

Allen H: Well, sometimes building a wind farm turns out more than expected construction workers at a 19 turbine wind project in lower Saxony Germany under Earth. What experts call the largest Bronze age Amber Horde ever found? The region, the very first scoop of an excavator brought up bronze and amber artifacts that stopped construction and brought archeologists back to the site.

Uh, the hoard has been dated between [00:22:00] 1500 and 1300 DCE and is believed to have belonged to at least three. Status women possibly buried as a religious offering. Now as we push further and further across Germany with wind turbines and solar panels for, for that matter, uh, we’re coming across older sites, uh, older pieces of ground that haven’t been touched in a long time and we’re, we’re gonna find more and more, uh, historically significant things buried in the soil.

What is the obligation? Of the constructor of this project and maybe across Europe. I, I would assume in the United States too, if we came across something that old and America’s just not that old to, to have anything of, of that kind of, um, maybe value or historically significant. What is the process here?

Rosemary Barnes: I assume that they’ve gotta stop, stop work. Um, yeah, that’s my, my understanding and I don’t think, do you have [00:23:00] grand designs in America?

Allen H: I don’t know what that is. Yes.

Rosemary Barnes: So missing out by not having that chat. It’s a TV show about people who are building houses or doing, um, ambitious renovations, and it just, it follows, it follows them.

You can learn a lot about project management or. The consequences if you decide that you don’t need to, project management isn’t a thing that you need to do. Um, anyway. I’m sure that in some of those ones I’ve seen they have had work stop because in their excavation they found a, um, yeah, some, some kind of relic, um, from the, from the past.

So based on that very well-credentialed experience that I have, I can confidently say that they would be stopping stopping work on that site. I mean, it’s so bad, bad for the developer, I guess, but it’s cool, right? That they’re, you know, uncovering, uh, new archeology and we can learn more about, you know, people that lived thousands of years ago.

Allen H: It, it does seem [00:24:00] like, obviously. Do push into places where humans have lived for thousands of years. We’re going to stumble across these things. Does that mean from a project standpoint, there’s, there’s some sort of financial consequence, like does the lower Saxony government contribute to the wind turbine fund to to pay the workers for a while?

’cause it seems like if they’re gonna do an archeological dig. That that’s gonna take months at a minimum, may, maybe not, but it usually, having watched these things go on it, it’s. It’s long.

Rosemary Barnes: But wouldn’t that be something that you’d have insurance for?

Allen H: Oh, maybe that’s it.

Rosemary Barnes: You know, it seems to me like an insurable, an insurable thing, like not so hard to, it would’ve affected plenty of other, like any project that involves excavation in Europe would come with a risk of, um, finding Yeah.

An archeological find. And having work stopped, I would assume.

Allen H: Yolanda, how does that work in the United States do, is there some insurance policy towards finding [00:25:00] a. Ancient burial ground and what happens to your project?

Yolanda Padron: I don’t know. I, um, the most I’ve heard has been, it’s just talking to like the government and like the local government and making sure that you have all your permits in place and making sure, you know, you might need to, to have certain studies so you know, you might not have to get rid of the whole wind farm or remove the hole wind farm, but at least a section.

Of it has to be displaced from what you originally had thought. I don’t know. I know it happens a lot in Mexico where you get a lot of changes to construction plans because you find historical artifacts or obviously not everybody does this, but like. Tales of construction workers who will like, find, they’re so jaded from finding historical artifacts that they just kind of like take and then dump them to the next plot over to not deal with it right now.

Not that it’s anything ethical, uh, or done by everybody, [00:26:00] uh, but it’s, but, but it’s a common occurrence, a relatively common occurrence.

Allen H: You would think it where a lot of wind turbines are in the United States, which is mostly Texas and kind of that. Midwest, uh, wind corridor that they would’ve stumbled across something somewhere.

But I did just a quick search. I really hadn’t found anything that there wasn’t like a Native American burial ground or something of that sort, which they previously knew. For the most part. It’s, so, it’s rare that, that you find something significant besides, well, maybe used some woolly mammoths tusks or something of that sort.

Uh, in the Midwest, it’s, it’s, so, it’s an odd thing, but is there a. A finder’s fee? Like do does the wind company get to take some of the proceeds of, of this? Trove of jewelry.

Rosemary Barnes: I, I would be highly surprised.

Allen H: Well, how does that work then? Rosemary?

Rosemary Barnes: I’d be highly surprised if that’s the case in Europe. I bet it would happen like that in America.

Allen H: Sounds like pirate bounty in a sense.

Rosemary Barnes: In, in Australia it wouldn’t be like that because [00:27:00]you, when you own land, you don’t actually. You, you own the right to do things from surface level and above, basically. I don’t know how excavation works. So you don’t generally have a a right to anything you find like that?

I mean, you shouldn’t either. It’s not, it’s not yours. It’s a, it belongs to the, I don’t know, the people that, that were buried. When you then to the, the land, like, I guess. The government in some way. I mean, in Australia it’s, um, like we don’t have so many archeological fines that you would find from digging.

I mean, it’s not that there’s none, but there’s not so many like that. But it is pretty common that, you know, there are special trees, um, you know, some old trees that predate, uh, white people arriving in Australia. And, um, you know, that have been used for, you know, like it might have a, a shield that’s been, um.

Carved out of it. Or, uh, hunting. Hunting things, ceremonial things, baskets, canoes, canoe like things, stuff like that. They call ’em a scar [00:28:00] tree ’cause they would cut it out of a living, living tree. And you know, so when you see a tree with those scars and that’s got, um, cultural significance. There’s also, you know, just trees that were, um.

That that was significant for cultural reasons and so you wouldn’t be able to cut down those trees if you were building any, doing any kind of development in Australia and a wind farm would be no different. I know that they are, there are guidelines for, if you do come across any kind of thing like that or you find any anything of cultural significance, then you have to report it and hopefully you don’t just move it onto the neighboring property.

Allen H: I know one of the things about watching, um. Some crazy Canadian shows is that. Uh, you have to have a Treasure Hunter’s license in Canada. So if you’re involved in that process, like you can’t dig, you can’t shovel things, only certain people can shovel. ’cause if they were to find something of value, you.

You’ll get taxed on it. So there’s just a lot of rules [00:29:00] about it. Even in Canada,

Rosemary Barnes: if I was an indigenous Australian and you know, some Europe person of European descent came and found some artifacts, uh, aboriginal. Artifacts. I would be pissed if they just took it and sold it. Like that’s just clearly inappropriate right.

To, to do that. So you, I don’t think it should be a free for all. If you find artifacts of cultural significance and you just, it’s, you find its keepers that, that doesn’t sound right to me at all.

Allen H: Can we talk about King Charles II’s visit to the United States for a brief moment?

Uh, he is a really good ambassador, just like, uh, the queen was forever. He’s, he does take it very seriously and the way that he interacted with the US delegation was remarkable at times in, in terms of knowing how to deal with somebody that there’s a war going on right now. So there’s a lot [00:30:00] happening in the United States that, uh, not only could it be.

Uh, respecting both sides of the UK and the United States’ position in a, in a number of different areas, but at the same time being humorous, trying to build bridges. Uh, king Charles, uh, had the scotch whiskey tariffs removed just by negotiating with President Trump, and sometimes that’s what it takes.

It’s a little bit of, uh. Being a good ambassador.

Allen H: Yeah. The very polished you would expect that. Right? But this is the first visit of. The king to the United States, I believe. ’cause he, he’s been obviously as a prince many, many, many times to the United States. [00:31:00]But this time as, as a, the representative of the country, the former representative or head of the country, which was unique.

I think he did a really good job. And I wish he, they would’ve talked about offshore wind. Maybe he could’ve calmed down the administration on offshore wind.

Rosemary Barnes: I bet that’s one of the, the goals. I mean, that’s an industry that’s important to. So

Allen H: I wonder if that happened actually. ’cause that’s not gonna be reported in, in the news, but how the UK is going on its own way in terms of electrification and I guarantee offshore wind had to come up it.

Although I have been not seen any article about it, I, I find it hard to believe that King Charles being the environmentalist that he is, and a proponent of offshore wind for a long time. Didn’t bring it up and try to mend some fences.

Rosemary Barnes: Maybe he’s playing the long game though. I mean, Trump is pretty, he’s transactional, but he also, you know, he has people that he really likes and you know, will act in their interests.

So maybe it’s enough to just be [00:32:00] really liked by Trump, and then that’s the smartest way you can go about it.

Allen H: Did you see the gift that King Charles presented to, uh, the US this past week?

It was a be from, uh, world War II submarine, which was the British, I dunno what the British called their submarines, but it was, the name of it was Trump. So they had the bell from. The submarine when it had been commissioned and they, they gave that to the United States, or give to the president. It goes to the United States.

The president doesn’t get to keep those things, but it was such a smart, it’s a great president. It’s such a smart gift, and somebody had to think about it and the king had to deliver it in a way that got rid of all the noise between the United States and the uk. Brought it back to, Hey, we have a lot in common [00:33:00] here.

We shouldn’t be bickering as much as we are. And I thought that was a really smart, tactful, sensible way to try to men some fences. That was really good. That wraps up another episode of the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast. If today’s discussion sparked any questions or ideas, we’d love to hear from you. Reach out to us on LinkedIn.

Don’t forget to subscribe, so you never miss this episode. And if you found value in today’s conversation, please leave us a review. It really helps other wind energy professionals discover the show. For Rosie and Yolanda, I’m Allen Hall and we with. See you’re here next week on the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast.

Vineyard Wind’s $69.50 PPA, Two Offshore Lease Exits

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

America Is a Gun

Published

on

I’ve enjoyed quite a few works from the poet whose work appears at left, but this one speaks to me most clearly.

Money means everything, and the value we put on the lives of our children pale in comparison.

America Is a Gun

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com