Tesla may be getting ready for one of the biggest solar manufacturing moves in America. Reuters reports that the company is looking at buying about $2.9 billion worth of equipment from Chinese suppliers to make solar cells and solar panels in the United States.

If the plan moves forward, it could help Tesla build up to 100 gigawatts of solar manufacturing capacity on American soil by the end of 2028. That is a huge number. It also shows how serious Elon Musk may be about turning solar into a much bigger part of Tesla’s future.

But the report also reveals a bigger problem for the U.S. clean energy sector. Even when companies want to manufacture in America, they still often depend on Chinese tools, machinery, and supply chains to make it happen.

Tesla’s Solar Dream Is Getting Bigger

According to Reuters, Tesla is in talks with several Chinese companies that make solar manufacturing equipment. Suzhou Maxwell Technologies is one of the main names in the discussion. The company is known as the world’s biggest maker of screen-printing equipment used in solar cell production.

Other possible suppliers include Shenzhen S.C New Energy Technology and Laplace Renewable Energy Technology, Reuters said, citing people familiar with the matter.

Some of the equipment may need export approval from China’s commerce ministry before it can be shipped. Reuters reported that the companies were asked to deliver the machinery before autumn, and two sources said the equipment would likely head to Texas.

These details suggest Tesla’s plan is not just an idea or a long-term goal. The company seems to be preparing for a major manufacturing buildout in the U.S. However, the company has not publicly confirmed the reported order. The Chinese suppliers and China’s commerce ministry also did not respond to Reuters’ requests for comment, according to the report.

In January, Musk said solar power could meet all of America’s electricity needs, including rising demand from data centers. Reuters also noted that Tesla job postings said the company wants to deploy 100 GW of “solar manufacturing from raw materials on American soil before the end of 2028.”

The Cost Gap Keeps China in Charge of Solar Supply Chains

After years of heavy investment, China controls most of the world’s solar manufacturing chain. According to Wood Mackenzie, China is expected to hold more than 80% of global polysilicon, wafer, cell, and module manufacturing capacity from 2023 to 2026.

Wood Mac also said a solar module made in China is about 50% cheaper than one made in Europe and 65% cheaper than one made in the United States. That price gap makes it hard for U.S. factories to compete, especially in the early stages.

So even when U.S. companies want to build locally, they still often need Chinese equipment and expertise. Reuters pointed out that the Biden administration excluded solar manufacturing equipment from tariffs in 2024 after U.S. solar companies said they had no real alternative source for the machines needed to launch domestic factories. That exemption has since been extended by the Trump administration.

In other words, America’s solar manufacturing push still depends, at least in part, on Chinese technology.

• READ MORE: Two Solar Stories, Two Different Directions: Why China Builds Faster as the U.S. Hits Pause

Why Tesla May Be Making This Move Now

Tesla’s reported plan is about much more than one company. It highlights a major challenge for the United States as it tries to build a stronger clean energy economy.

U.S. electricity demand is rising again, and solar is growing fast. The Energy Information Administration said U.S. power use hit its second straight record high in 2025. It also expects demand to keep rising in 2026 and 2027.

At the same time, solar is becoming one of the country’s fastest-growing power sources. In its latest outlook, the EIA said utility-scale solar generation in the U.S. is expected to grow from 290 billion kilowatt-hours in 2025 to 424 billion kilowatt-hours by 2027.

The EIA also said nearly 70 GW of new solar capacity is scheduled to come online in 2026 and 2027. That would increase U.S. solar operating capacity by 49% compared with the end of 2025.

Texas Solar Capacity Supports Tesla and SpaceX

Texas is expected to lead much of that growth. Solar generation in the ERCOT grid is forecast to rise from 56 billion kilowatt-hours in 2025 to 106 billion kilowatt-hours by 2027. Battery storage is also growing to help balance solar power throughout the day.

This helps explain why Texas is such an important part of Tesla’s reported plan. The state already plays a big role in Tesla’s manufacturing footprint. It is also one of the hottest solar markets in the country.

For Tesla, building solar equipment or solar products in Texas could support more than just the grid. Reuters said Musk plans to use much of the capacity for Tesla itself, while some could also help power SpaceX satellites.

That would turn solar into a strategic asset across Musk’s wider business empire. It would also tie clean power more closely to Tesla’s long-term growth story, especially as energy demand from artificial intelligence and data infrastructure keeps rising across the country.

Snapshot of US Solar Imports

Even with more local manufacturing, the U.S. solar market still depends heavily on imported parts. Solar Power World reviewed U.S. International Trade Commission data and found that the United States imported 33 GW of silicon solar panels in 2025. It also imported 21 GW of silicon solar cells.

That cell figure is especially important because it shows that U.S. panel assembly is growing faster than domestic cell production. America may be building more panels at home, but it still imports many of the core components needed to make them.

The report said the U.S. has around 50 GW of silicon panel assembly capacity, but less than 5 GW of domestic cell manufacturing output. That means plenty of cells still have to be imported. Notably, most imported cells came from Indonesia and Laos in 2025, while South Korea was also a major supplier.

This is where Tesla could make a difference. If it builds large-scale solar cell and panel manufacturing in the U.S., it could help close one of the biggest gaps in the domestic solar supply chain.

Still, there is an irony here. To reduce America’s dependence on foreign solar products, Tesla may first need to buy Chinese machines.

A Massive Opportunity, But Also a Huge Challenge

If the deal happens, it would be a major win for Chinese solar equipment companies. Many of them have faced weak domestic demand because China has already built too much manufacturing capacity.

For Tesla, the order could lay the foundation for a giant U.S. solar platform. It could support the company’s long-term energy strategy at a time when America needs more electricity, more solar, and more battery storage.

But the challenge is enormous.

Building 100 GW of solar manufacturing capacity in just a few years would be a staggering task. Tesla would need factories, workers, permits, raw materials, logistics, and smooth equipment delivery. It would also need stable trade rules and a supportive policy environment.

The company has already faced supply chain setbacks before. Reuters previously reported that production preparations for the Cybertruck and Semi in the U.S. were disrupted last year after component shipments from China were suspended following higher tariffs on Chinese goods. This history shows how exposed U.S. manufacturing can still be to trade tensions.

If speculations are true, Musk appears to be thinking far beyond electric vehicles, i.e., building a larger clean energy system around solar, batteries, manufacturing, and power demand from new technologies like AI.

For now, Reuters’ report shows a simple reality. The U.S. wants a homegrown solar industry. Tesla may want to help build one. But China still holds many of the tools needed to make that goal real.

• ALSO SEE: The AI Energy War: How China’s Solar and Nuclear Outshine the U.S.

The post Is Tesla Building a 100 GW U.S. Solar Giant With Chinese Equipment? appeared first on Carbon Credits.

The European Union is preparing to make large changes to its carbon pricing system. EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced that the bloc will revise its Emissions Trading System (ETS) and launch a new €30 billion cleantech investment fund. These moves aim to support the bloc’s climate goals and help industry cope with shifting energy markets.

The announcements came after a summit of EU leaders focused on energy prices and economic challenges. Rising global energy prices and geopolitical pressures are affecting Europe’s economy and industry.

The new proposals aim to improve the EU’s carbon pricing system. They will also encourage investment in clean technology throughout the bloc.

Von der Leyen said:

“The Emissions Trading System is working. It has massively reduced gas consumption. Because of that, it has reduced our dependency on imports of fossil fuels, and it has reduced our vulnerability. And it has driven major investments in the energy transition in the low-carbon energy sources like renewables and nuclear that are homegrown and give us independence. But we need to modernise it and make it more flexible.”

What Is the EU Emissions Trading System and Why Change It?

The EU’s Emissions Trading System is the bloc’s main carbon pricing tool. It was set up in 2005 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from major industrial sectors. These include electricity and heat generation, steel, cement, chemicals, and commercial aviation.

Under the ETS, companies must buy permits for each ton of carbon dioxide they emit. The total number of permits is capped to reduce emissions over time.

Over nearly two decades, the ETS has helped reduce Europe’s dependence on fossil fuels and encouraged investment in cleaner energy. It is often viewed as a cornerstone of the EU’s climate policy.

The EU ETS continues to generate large revenues that fund climate action across Europe. In 2025, total ETS auction revenues exceeded €43 billion, with about €24 billion going directly to EU member states.

The remaining funds were allocated to EU-level programs such as the Innovation Fund, Modernisation Fund, and the Social Climate Fund. Overall, ETS revenues since 2013 have surpassed €258 billion, making it one of the world’s largest carbon market funding sources.

However, rising energy costs are pressuring European industries. They started with the war in Ukraine and are now impacted by conflicts in the Middle East. Some member states have asked for a review of the ETS to ease short‑term burdens.

Planned changes “in the next days” may include:

• Updating benchmarks for free allowances given to the industry.
• Strengthening the Market Stability Reserve, which manages the supply of carbon allowances to stabilize prices.

Future changes will seek a “more realistic trajectory.” They may also extend free allocation for some industries past 2034.

Carbon Pricing in Europe: The Stakes and the Context

Carbon pricing has been a key driver of investment in clean energy. ETS prices influence how companies weigh fossil fuels versus low‑carbon options. In recent weeks, ETS prices have fluctuated, partly in response to talks about reform and broader energy market volatility.

Recent reports noted that benchmark EU carbon prices jumped almost 10% after policy statements from EU leadership.

Market stability is a core concern. The ETS’s design includes mechanisms to support consistent carbon prices, especially during times of economic stress. A strong and predictable carbon price can help investors commit to long‑term clean energy projects. Conversely, sudden changes can raise costs for industrial players and weaken investment incentives.

At the same time, formal industry and civil society groups have called for regulatory certainty. They say stable carbon pricing is key for planning big clean energy projects. It also helps the EU keep its role as a leader in global climate efforts. These groups emphasize that unpredictable policy shifts could slow clean industrial growth and raise risk for new projects.

• RELATED: EU Carbon Market under Pressure: Business Lobby for Reform, Italy Calls for Suspension

A New €30 Billion Cleantech Fund to Boost Decarbonization

Alongside ETS reform, von der Leyen announced plans for a €30 billion ETS Investment Booster. This new fund will support decarbonization and clean technology projects across Europe. It will be financed by revenues from the ETS, meaning carbon pricing will help fund climate action directly.

The booster fund will operate on a “first-come, first-served” basis to support ready‑to‑deploy projects. Von der Leyen said that the fund will ensure access for lower‑income member states. This is intended to promote fairness across the EU and help balance regional disparities in clean technology investment.

The new fund complements existing EU climate finance mechanisms. The Innovation Fund has backed many projects. These include renewable energy, energy storage, and industrial decarbonization.

In 2024, the Innovation Fund provided €4.8 billion in grants. This supported 85 innovative net-zero projects. These efforts helped reduce nearly 476 million tonnes of CO₂ in the first decade.

Expanding funding sources for clean industrial investments reflects a broader EU trend. The Clean Industrial Deal, launched in 2025, plans to raise over €100 billion. This funding will support clean technology manufacturing, create jobs, boost energy efficiency, and promote circular economy solutions.

• SEE MORE: EU Unlocks €5.2B for Clean-Tech Innovation: Hydrogen, Heat, and Net-Zero Projects

Renewables, Baseload, and Energy Market Trends in Europe

The EU’s net‑zero journey sits against a backdrop of changing energy markets. Renewable energy deployment in Europe continues to grow rapidly.

Wind and solar now make up an increasing share of electricity generation in many member states. These technologies are expected to gain further market share as costs fall and grid integration improves.

However, the need for stable and resilient power systems has grown. Renewable sources like wind and solar are variable by nature. This increases interest in baseload options like geothermal, hydropower, nuclear, and storage paired with renewables.

Meanwhile, global energy prices have remained volatile. Brent crude prices rose above $110 per barrel due to geopolitical tensions. This increase is driving up electricity and heating costs in Europe. These price swings can influence industrial competitiveness and household energy bills.

EU leaders view carbon pricing and investment in decarbonization as key to reducing long-term risks from unstable fossil fuel markets. Policymakers want to use ETS revenues for clean technologies. This will help reduce the need for imported fuels and boost energy independence.

Industry Reaction: Balancing Flexibility and Climate Signals

The proposed changes have drawn mixed reactions. Some industry groups welcomed the updates to the ETS. They said the funding support could help reduce short-term cost pressures. Others warn that too much flexibility could weaken long‑term climate signals and reduce investment certainty.

Civil society organizations have stressed the importance of maintaining carbon pricing integrity. They believe a strong, predictable ETS is key. It will boost investment in electrification, renewables, energy efficiency, and circular economy solutions. Maintaining the market’s rules‑based design, supporters say, will help the EU stay on track with its 2030 and 2040 climate targets.

The European Council has invited the Commission to present a formal ETS review by July 2026 at the latest. This timeline reflects the urgency of balancing climate goals with current economic pressures.

Looking Ahead: Combining Policy and Investment for Climate Goals

The post EU Plans Major Carbon Pricing Overhaul and €30B Clean Tech Boost to Drive Decarbonization appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Disseminated on behalf of Surge Battery Metals Inc.

Global lithium markets are reacting to a major policy change in China. Beijing announced it will phase out VAT export rebates on battery products. The move caused a surge in lithium-related material prices and caught the attention of producers, buyers, and investors worldwide.

This change is more than a short-term lithium price spike. It may shift global lithium supply chains. Companies that relied heavily on Chinese exports now need to think about alternative sources. Non-Chinese producers, especially in stable countries, could gain a competitive advantage.

China’s rebate rollback affects how battery makers plan production and exports. Some companies may sell more lithium at home or adjust prices for overseas shipments. This policy highlights that government rules can shape the lithium market just as much as supply and demand.

Global Supply Chains Feel the Shock

China has long been the leader in battery-grade lithium production and battery manufacturing. Export rebates made Chinese batteries and lithium products cheaper for global buyers. Removing these rebates changes the economics for Chinese companies.

One short-term effect may be less lithium available for export. Companies could focus on domestic sales or reduce shipments abroad due to higher costs. Buyers in other regions may need to seek new suppliers or invest in local production.

This shows that geopolitics and policy now influence lithium markets heavily. Global buyers are increasingly aware of supply risks caused by policy changes. As a result, companies with high-quality lithium projects in politically stable countries are likely to become more important.

NILI: A Stable Bet in Uncertain Times 

Surge Battery Metals (TSX-V: NILI | OTCQX: NILIF) is in a strong position to benefit from these changes. Its flagship project, the Nevada North Lithium Project (NNLP), is located in a mining-friendly U.S. region. The project has access to roads, power, skilled labor, and regulatory clarity, which reduce risks for development.

Unlike areas where policies can change quickly, Surge Battery Metals offers a stable, high-quality lithium source. Early exploration at Nevada North shows lithium clay grades of up to 8,070 ppm, considered high for clay-based deposits. 

More notably, ongoing metallurgical tests show the project could operate at competitive costs and deliver strong financial returns. This makes NILI ready to meet the growing demand from electric vehicles (EVs), grid storage, and other industrial applications.

China’s export policy change increases the strategic importance of projects like Nevada North. Buyers who want a secure supply of lithium may turn to projects in stable regions. Surge Battery Metals is well-positioned to fill that role.

Strategic Advantages Beyond Location

Surge is also building a strong team to advance the project. Recent executive hires bring experience from the battery supply chain, including sourcing lithium for automakers. This expertise helps NILI form strong partnerships and prepare for commercial production.

With China cutting export rebates, some buyers may face higher costs or delays. NILI’s Nevada project can provide a reliable alternative. This is especially important for North American battery makers and EV companies that want supply security close to home.

The project’s economic potential is strong. Preliminary assessments indicate Nevada North could produce tens of thousands of tonnes of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) per year, 86,300. 

The project is now moving toward a Pre-Feasibility Study targeted for completion in late 2026, with engineering led by global firm Fluor Corporation.

The project also benefits from favorable operating costs, US$5,243/t LCE, and the potential to expand its resource base through continued drilling. Surge recently strengthened this position with new drill results from Nevada North. 

The company reported a 30.6-meter intercept grading 4,196 ppm lithium from surface in a 640-meter step-out hole to the southeast. This wide step-out confirms that strong lithium grades extend beyond the current resource boundary. 

In infill drilling, Surge also reported 116 meters averaging 3,752 ppm lithium, including 32.1 meters grading 4,521 ppm near surface. This confirms the presence of a strong, high-grade core within the deposit.

These results highlight the scale and growth potential of the project. These factors make NILI a strategically important player in the global lithium market.

Key advantages that position Surge Battery Metals strategically in the market today:

• NILI’s 100% owned NNLP: 20,000+ acres prime Nevada clay – grades rival brine peers.
• Recent Wins: Oct 2025 BLM plan filed; Q1 2026 drilling planned.
• Investor Edge: TSX-V NILI up 25% post-China news – early positioning pays.

SEE MORE: Lithium Prices Climb Again in 2026, Sending Stocks Upward

The Bigger Picture: Supply Chain Security Matters

The lithium market is changing. In the past, supply and demand drove prices and investment decisions. Today, policy, geopolitics, and supply chain security are just as important. China’s export rebate rollback shows how quickly government decisions can affect global markets.

Companies with projects in stable, well-regulated regions are becoming more valuable. Investors and battery makers are looking for high-quality lithium resources that can provide a consistent supply without the risk of sudden policy changes. NILI’s Nevada North project fits this need.

The market is also paying more attention to long-term demand trends. Beyond EVs, lithium is needed for industrial storage systems, AI data centers, and grid-scale energy storage. 

Benchmark’s insights show that data centre electricity demand will rise sharply. Battery energy storage systems (BESS) will be crucial for ensuring power reliability as data centre capacity expands. The growing need for BESS will boost long-term demand for lithium storage. This reinforces lithium projects like NILI’s Nevada North, which can help meet future energy storage needs for expanding data centers.

Long-Term Implications for Investors and Industry

The Nevada North Lithium Project offers high-grade lithium in a politically stable region, with strong infrastructure and skilled labor. The company is positioning itself to meet rising demand from both EVs and other battery markets.

The policy shift in China highlights this strategic importance. With reduced incentives for Chinese exports, buyers are looking for alternative sources. NILI provides a safe, reliable, and high-quality supply, making it a strong partner for battery manufacturers in North America and beyond.

The company’s focus on commercial readiness further strengthens its position. Experienced executives and industry veterans are helping NILI form partnerships and prepare for eventual production. This approach ensures that Nevada North is not just a resource but a fully integrated solution for the lithium supply chain.

NILI in the New Supply Chain Era

For investors, projects like NILI offer exposure to high-grade resources in stable jurisdictions. For battery manufacturers, Nevada North represents a secure supply chain option that can reduce dependence on any single country or region.

China’s policy change is a reminder that supply chain risk matters in the lithium market. Investors, manufacturers, and policymakers are increasingly focused on reliable and diversified sources of lithium.

For anyone looking for safe, high-quality lithium, Surge Battery Metals is a company to consider. As global supply chains adjust to policy changes, the lithium junior is well-positioned to take advantage of new opportunities and strengthen its role in the lithium market.

• READ MORE: The U.S. EV Supply Chain Race: Where Surge Battery Metals Fits in the National Critical Minerals Strategy
  

DISCLAIMER 

New Era Publishing Inc. and/or CarbonCredits.com (“We” or “Us”) are not securities dealers or brokers, investment advisers, or financial advisers, and you should not rely on the information herein as investment advice. Surge Battery Metals Inc. (“Company”) made a one-time payment of $75,000 to provide marketing services for a term of three months. None of the owners, members, directors, or employees of New Era Publishing Inc. and/or CarbonCredits.com currently hold, or have any beneficial ownership in, any shares, stocks, or options of the companies mentioned.

This article is informational only and is solely for use by prospective investors in determining whether to seek additional information. It does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. Examples that we provide of share price increases pertaining to a particular issuer from one referenced date to another represent arbitrarily chosen time periods and are no indication whatsoever of future stock prices for that issuer and are of no predictive value.

Our stock profiles are intended to highlight certain companies for your further investigation; they are not stock recommendations or an offer or sale of the referenced securities. The securities issued by the companies we profile should be considered high-risk; if you do invest despite these warnings, you may lose your entire investment. Please do your own research before investing, including reviewing the companies’ SEDAR+ and SEC filings, press releases, and risk disclosures.

It is our policy that information contained in this profile was provided by the company, extracted from SEDAR+ and SEC filings, company websites, and other publicly available sources. We believe the sources and information are accurate and reliable but we cannot guarantee them.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT AND FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Certain statements contained in this news release may constitute “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Forward-looking information generally can be identified by words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “plan,” and similar expressions suggesting future outcomes or events. Forward-looking information is based on current expectations of management; however, it is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated.

These factors include, without limitation, statements relating to the Company’s exploration and development plans, the potential of its mineral projects, financing activities, regulatory approvals, market conditions, and future objectives. Forward-looking information involves numerous risks and uncertainties and actual results might differ materially from results suggested in any forward-looking information. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things, market volatility, the state of financial markets for the Company’s securities, fluctuations in commodity prices, operational challenges, and changes in business plans.

Forward-looking information is based on several key expectations and assumptions, including, without limitation, that the Company will continue with its stated business objectives and will be able to raise additional capital as required. Although management of the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated, or intended.

There can be no assurance that such forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Additional information about risks and uncertainties is contained in the Company’s management’s discussion and analysis and annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2025, copies of which are available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.

The forward-looking information contained herein is expressly qualified in its entirety by this cautionary statement. Forward-looking information reflects management’s current beliefs and is based on information currently available to the Company. The forward-looking information is made as of the date of this news release, and the Company assumes no obligation to update or revise such information to reflect new events or circumstances except as may be required by applicable law.

The post China Cuts Battery Export Rebates, Sending Lithium Prices Up and Boosting NILI’s Role in Global Lithium Supply appeared first on Carbon Credits.