Anton and I have just brought CTD cast number 45 to light. While we are once again shaking freshly tapped bottles with great enthusiasm, I think I can make out question marks in Jamileh’s expression as she smiles good morning to us. That’s what everyone here seems to be thinking: 45 CTD casts already? And many of them in the same place? Why all this? We should know the water once we’ve “measured” it, right? Well, somehow we do.
“Our” CTD, which biologists prefer to call a “water sampler”, is moved out of the side of the hangar, lowered and in the basic version measures Conductivity (salinity), Temperature and pressure (Depth) quasi continuously (at 24 Hz), ideally down to the seafloor. In addition, oxygen and fluorescence are measured, which makes it possible to estimate biological productivity (see previous blog entries by Nicole and Manfred). As an addition, water samples can be taken at various depths using the 24 Niskin bottles (Manfred is by far our best customer in this respect). For oceanographers, however, the continuous measurements of temperature and salinity are of crucial importance, as they allow us to see how stable the water is stratified, for example, or to deduce the origin of the water masses and geostrophic currents. This is important information that forms the framework conditions that strongly influence the local ecosystem. In order to achieve maximum precision in the physical measurements, I take water samples myself “only” to calibrate the oxygen and salinity sensors later, but not to analyze the suspicious living beings in it.
Most of the deployments to date have been close to shore at a depth of about 1500 meters. The following figure shows one of our precious deeper profiles down to a depth of almost 3300 meters. Here, the top 100 meters form the so-called “mixed layer”, in which all measured variables are well mixed by the wind. We observe that the depth of this surface layer varies, but is generally comparatively thick – as is typical for the winter months at these latitudes. At our first station, the mixed layer depth was even around 200m! Temperature (red), salt (blue), oxygen (yellow) and chlorophyll (green) draw practically vertical lines in the diagram. Interestingly, a maximum of chlorophyll often forms exactly at or below the surface layer, which serves as an indicator for the presence of phytoplankton (see Nicole’s and Manfred’s blog entry on “Micro-Creatures”). Although phytoplankton is basically autotrophic, i.e. dependent on sunlight, it can survive in this rather deep layer with very little sunlight. One reason for this is the increased nutrient content in deeper layers.
In addition, the pycnocline directly below the mixed layer forms a strong physical barrier to vertical mixing and can practically “trap” organisms that cannot actively swim themselves. The pycnocline is the layer in which the density of the water increases very rapidly with depth (here due to the temperature gradient). These layers contain a wide range of temperature and salt contents and are also called Central Waters. To identify water masses, temperatures and salinities are plotted against each other in a so-called “T-S diagram” (as shown in Figure 4). In our example, you can clearly see that the water around Madeira consists largely of Eastern North Atlantic Central Water (ENACW). This water mass dominates the pycnocline in the large North Atlantic Gyre and is significantly more saline than in the South Atlantic (see Eastern South Atlantic Central Water). In our profile number 41 (Figure 3), however, something else catches the eye. At around 1100m, there is a nose with a significantly higher salinity, which does not seem to match the linear Central Water. The influence of the Mediterranean Water (MW) is noticeable here, which has a particularly high salt content due to the predominantly high evaporation and low precipitation in the Mediterranean region.
Due to this high salt content, it manifests itself at greater depths, typically around 1100m to 1200m, despite the warm temperatures. However, we can also see in the T-S diagram that the Mediterranean water in the south of Madeira is already somewhat more mixed, i.e. less warm and saline than directly at the outflow of the Mediterranean. Even further down, which we can observe particularly well at our deeper CTD stations around 3000m, resides the famous North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW). This is formed by, for instance, deep convection in the North Atlantic and plays a central role in global thermohaline circulation and climate dynamics. Although constituting deep water, it is comparatively “young” and therefore rich in oxygen (we like to say “well ventilated”) and forms a contrast to the oxygen minimum, which we observe here around Madeira at around 800-900 meters. This minimum zone is formed by respiration of the sunken organic material, e.g. from the sunlight-dependent phytoplankton in the uppermost ~150 meters. Compared to the large known oxygen minimum zones in the subtropical eastern Atlantic and Pacific, however, there is still comparatively abundant oxygen.
Now, we know the profile of a single CTD station a little better. Basically, this one is actually fairly representative of the other 44, so the question of why Anton and I keep “driving CTDs” like madmen remains unanswered. However, if we take a closer look, we can see that the temperature and salinity profiles are not completely “smooth”. In fact, we discover small wavelike deviations. Measurement inaccuracies? No. It is internal waves that bring “life” to the profiles. Internal waves can occur in any stratified medium, i.e. fluids in which the density is not constant. There are two restoring forces that act on internal waves in the ocean: Gravity and the Coriolis force. The main drivers of internal waves are the tides (such as ebb and flow), closely followed by wind. We know that internal waves play a crucial role in energy transport in the ocean. Like ordinary surface waves, internal waves can also break. When they do, mixing takes place. This in turn can transport nutrients and thereby influence biological productivity. The interaction of internal waves with topography (i.e. islands such as Madeira) and currents is very complex and not yet fully understood. By using a large number of stations at different times (and tidal stages), we obtain a better spatial and temporal resolution of the internal wave field and improve our understanding. That’s also why we are fans of so-called “yo-yo CTDs”. Just like a real yo-yo, we move the CTD up and down several times in direct succession at one and the same location.
In the figure above, we have plotted six directly consecutive profiles of a “CTD yo-yo” on top of each other. You can see that the profiles deviate more from each other at some depths and not at others (nodal points). The most impressive influence is exerted by internal waves on the mixed layer depth, which can vary by several tens of meters within minutes.
There is a particular thrill when the “Eddy hunt” is called for. That sounds more martial than it is meant to be. Eddies are oceanic vortices that reach a diameter of about 50 km around Madeira, interact with topography (islands) and internal waves and are known to have an impact on biodiversity. They develop over a period of days/weeks and are unfortunately hardly predictable. Therefore, we check satellite and model data for the region daily to identify a possible feature and, if possible, sample in situ with Merian. Strong eddies can generate a signal in sea level, surface temperatures and chlorophyll, recognizable via satellites. Our colleagues from the Oceanographic Institute of Madeira are helping us on site by providing the regional satellite and model data (see https://oomdata.arditi.pt/msm126/). Overall, it is impressive how well the collaboration on board and beyond works! One “eddy hunt” has already taken place on the night of February 13-14. However, the satellite signal was weak, and accordingly we were unable to detect a strong, coherent eddy In Situ with our shipboard ADCP (Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler, which measures ocean currents down to a depth of almost 1000m). (Side note: However, another exciting feature (presumably a strong internal wave) was identified in the surface layer, which we are now analyzing.)
In one of the following contributions, we want to prove to you that our beloved CTD is something very special in purely “objective” terms thanks to sophisticated tuning, including high-resolution camera systems. Then we’ll explain why Anton, although he’s not a physical oceanographer, also likes to drive “CTD yo-yos” and there will finally be photos of aquatic animals again!
Greetings from on board RV MARIA S. MERIAN,
Marco Schulz und Anton Theileis
Between all the scientific work, we celebrated Easter on board, although the weather had other plans for us. Due to rough conditions, we weren’t able to carry out any CTD casts.
Easter itself was spent in a mix of rest and small celebrations. Some of us enjoyed a long Easter breakfast with traditional Easter bread, while others took the opportunity to sleep in. In the evening, we gathered with both crew and scientists for a small celebration. The ship’s cook even organized a quiz, and those who answered correctly were rewarded with Easter chocolate.
The next day, the weather improved, and we began early with the recovery of K1, a 3,495-meter-long mooring in the middle of the Labrador Sea.
We joined the nautical officers on the bridge before sunrise to search for it. Fortunately, K1 has a floating buoy with a light, so we were able to spot it even in the dark. The actual recovery started at first light, and it began to snow while we were working.
Amid all the CTDs and mooring operations, there was also a personal highlight: my (Sarah’s) birthday. Although I’ve spent birthdays away from home before, this one felt especially unique, being so far out at sea, with only limited internet contact.
Normally, I work the 4-8 shift, but my incredibly kind shift team gave me the morning off. That meant I could sleep in and even find time to call family and friends back home. In the afternoon, I was surprised with my favourite cake, baked by Julia.
Our work continued with the mooring array at 53°N, which consists of seven moorings. So far, we have recovered five (K7, K8, K9, DSOW1 and DSOW2), and three of them have already been redeployed (K7, K8 and DSOW1,).
Deploying K7 turned out to be particularly tricky. On our first attempt, sea ice drifted toward us faster than expected, forcing us to recover nearly half of the mooring again. While the ship itself can handle drifting ice, deploying a mooring is much more delicate: a long cable with instruments and floats is released behind the ship before the anchor is dropped, allowing the system to sink into place.
Two days later, we tried again and this time, the deployment was successful.
Afterwards, we moved closer to the sea ice, which was a highlight for many of us. Seeing the ice up close and even spotting a seal swimming nearby, made the experience unforgettable.
Due to the continuing harsh weather, the decision was made to return to K1 and make use of an upcoming weather window for deployment the following day.
German:
Zwischen Stürmen und Wissenschaft: Ostern in der Labradorsee (04.04.26 – 13.04.26)
Zwischen all der wissenschaftlichen Arbeit haben wir Ostern an Bord gefeiert, auch wenn das Wetter andere Pläne für uns hatte. Aufgrund der rauen Bedingungen konnten wir keine CTD-Messungen durchführen (Messungen von Leitfähigkeit, Temperatur und Tiefe im Ozean).
Ostern selbst war eine Mischung aus Erholung und kleinen Feierlichkeiten. Einige von uns genossen ein ausgedehntes Osterfrühstück mit traditionellem Osterbrot, während andere die Gelegenheit nutzten, etwas länger zu schlafen. Am Abend kamen Crew und Wissenschaftler*innen zu einer kleinen Feier zusammen. Der Koch organisierte sogar ein Quiz, und wer die Fragen richtig beantwortete, wurde mit Oster-Schokolade belohnt.
Am nächsten Tag besserte sich das Wetter, und wir begannen früh mit der Bergung von K1, einer 3.495 Meter langen Verankerung mitten in der Labradorsee. (Eine Verankerung ist eine lange, am Meeresboden befestigter Draht, der mit Instrumenten ausgestattet ist, um über längere Zeit Ozeandaten zu messen.)
Noch vor Sonnenaufgang gingen wir mit den nautischen Offizieren auf die Brücke, um nach ihr Ausschau zu halten. Glücklicherweise verfügt K1 über eine schwimmende Boje mit Licht, sodass wir sie bereits im Dunkeln entdecken konnten. Die eigentliche Bergung begann bei Tagesanbruch und es begann sogar zu schneien.
Zwischen all den CTD-Einsätzen und Verankerungsarbeiten gab es auch ein persönliches Highlight: meinen (Sarahs) Geburtstag. Obwohl ich schon öfter Geburtstage fernab von zu Hause verbracht habe, war dieser besonders, so weit draußen auf dem Meer und mit nur eingeschränktem Internetkontakt.
Normalerweise arbeite ich in der 4-8 Uhr Schicht, aber mein unglaublich nettes Schichtteam hat mir den Morgendienst freigegeben. So konnte ich etwas länger schlafen und hatte sogar Zeit, mit Familie und Freunden zu Hause zu telefonieren. Am Nachmittag wurde ich dann noch mit meinem Lieblingskuchen überrascht, den Julia für mich gebacken hat.
Unsere Arbeit ging weiter mit dem Verankerungs-Array bei 53°, das aus sieben Verankerungen besteht. Bisher haben wir fünf geborgen (DSOW1, DSOW2, K7, K8 und K9), von denen drei bereits wieder ausgebracht wurden (DSOW1, K7 und K8).
Das Ausbringen von K7 erwies sich als besonders schwierig. Beim ersten Versuch trieb das Meereis schneller auf uns zu als erwartet, sodass wir fast die Hälfte der Verankerung wieder einholen mussten. Obwohl das Schiff selbst gut durch treibendes Eis navigieren kann, ist das Ausbringen einer Verankerung deutlich anspruchsvoller: Dabei wird ein langer Draht mit Messinstrumenten und Auftriebskörpern hinter dem Schiff ausgesetzt, bevor am Ende der Anker gelöst wird und das gesamte System absinkt.
Zwei Tage später versuchten wir es erneut, diesmal mit Erfolg.
Anschließend fuhren wir näher an das Meereis heran, was für viele von uns ein besonderes Highlight war. Das Eis aus nächster Nähe zu sehen und sogar eine Robbe in der Nähe schwimmen zu beobachten, machte das Erlebnis unvergesslich.
Aufgrund der weiterhin rauen Wetterbedingungen wurde schließlich entschieden, zu K1 zurückzukehren, um ein bevorstehendes Wetterfenster für die Ausbringung am nächsten Tag zu nutzen.
Between Storms and Science: Easter in the Labrador Sea (04.04.26–13.04.26)
Ocean Acidification
Humans Just Flew Around the Moon This Week. But Would Babies Born There Ever Truly Feel Gravity? Ask Jellyfish Babies.
This week, NASA’s Artemis II crew made history by flying around the Moon and returning safely to Earth, the first human journey to the Moon’s vicinity in more than 50 years. It was a stunning reminder that humanity is no longer just dreaming about living beyond Earth. We are actively rehearsing for it.
And that leads to a much stranger, deeper question: even if one day we build skyscrapers on the Moon, raise families there, and turn space into a place to live, will babies born away from Earth develop a normal sense of gravity? Or will their bodies learn the universe differently?
To explore that question, NASA once turned to an unexpected stand-in for human babies: jellyfish babies. On the STS-40 mission, scientists sent thousands of tiny jellyfish polyps into space because jellyfish, like humans, rely on gravity-sensing structures to orient themselves. The experiment asked a simple but profound question: if a living body develops in microgravity, will it still know how to handle gravity later?
The answer was both fascinating and unsettling. The jellyfish developed in space in large numbers, but once back under Earth’s gravity, the ones that had developed in microgravity showed far more pulsing abnormalities than the Earth-grown controls. In other words, their bodies formed, but their sense of balance did not seem to work quite the same way.
That is why this old jellyfish experiment still matters today. Before we imagine lunar cities, schools, nurseries, and generations born off-world, we need to ask not only whether humans can survive in space, but whether developing there changes how the body understands something as basic as up, down, and movement. Jellyfish babies cannot tell us everything about human children, but they may have given us one of the first clues that life born beyond Earth might not come home unchanged.
Reference: https://nlsp.nasa.gov/view/lsdapub/lsda_experiment/0c10d660-6b12-573d-8c3b-e20e071aed3b
Image: GEOMAR, Sarah Uphoff
After a slight delay of the Maria S. Merian caused by late-arriving containers our research cruise MSM142 finally got underway. By last Tuesday (24.03.2026), the full scientific team had arrived in Nuuk, the capital of Greenland, and the ship reached port on Wednesday (25.03.2026) morning. That same day, scientists and technicians moved on board and immediately began preparations, assembling and testing our instruments. Although the mornings on Wednesday and Thursday were grey and overcast, the afternoons cleared up beautifully. This gave us valuable time to organize equipment on deck and store empty boxes back into the containers before departure.
Given the forecast of harsh conditions outside the fjord, we carried out the mandatory safety drill while still in harbour. This included practicing emergency procedures and boarding the lifeboat. After completing border control, we were finally ready to leave Nuuk. We set sail on March 27th, heading into the Labrador Sea to begin our mission. Even before starting scientific operations, we tested the setup for deploying our gliders without releasing them during the transit out of the fjord. Once we reached open waters, we were met by high waves the following morning. For some on board, this was their first experience under such rough sea conditions. Seasickness quickly became a challenge for a few, while scientific work had to be temporarily postponed due to the strong winds and sea conditions. Together with the crew, we discussed how best to adapt our measurement plans to the given weather conditions. On March 29th, we were finally able to begin our scientific program with the first CTD deployment. A CTD is an instrument used to measure conductivity, temperature, and depth, which are key parameters for understanding ocean structure.
During the following night, we continued with additional CTD stations and successfully recovered two moorings: DSOW 3 and DSOW 4, located south of Greenland. These moorings carry instruments at various depths that measure velocity, temperature, and salinity. DSOW 4 was redeployed on the same day, while DSOW 3 followed the next day. In addition, the bottles attached to the CTD’s rosette can be used to collect water samples from any desired depth. These samples can be used, for example, to determine the oxygen content, nutrient levels, and organic matter.
Both are part of the OSNAP array, a network of moorings spanning the subpolar North Atlantic. On these moorings are a few instruments, for example microcats which measure temperature, pressure and salinity.
We then conducted around 25 CTD stations spaced approximately 3 nautical miles apart across an Irminger ring identified from satellite data. This high-resolution sampling was necessary to capture the structure of an Irminger Ring, which had a radius of about 12 km wide.
The days leading up to April 2nd were marked by very rough weather conditions. Life on board became both challenging and, at times, unintentionally entertaining sliding chairs were not uncommon. During the night from April 1st to April 2nd, winds reached 11 Beaufort with gusts up to 65 knots, forcing us to pause our measurements. Fortunately, conditions improved by morning, allowing us to resume our work. As well as with the help of the crew we had to adapt to the harsh weather conditions to continue our scientific work. On the 3rd of April, we were able to deploy a few gliders and one float. An ocean glider is an autonomous underwater Vehicle, which you can steer remotely and send to different locations, while it is measuring oceanographic key parameters.
This research cruise focuses on understanding small-scale processes in the ocean and their connection to the spring bloom, an essential phase in marine ecosystem in subpolar regions. Despite the challenging start, we have already gathered valuable data and look forward to the weeks ahead in the Labrador Sea.
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿：满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Renewable Energy6 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits