The Georgia Public Service Commission (PSC) today neglected an opportunity to pursue equity in rates for residential and small business customers.
These customer classes have funded the vast majority (80%-90% of around $4 billion) collected through the Nuclear Construction Cost Recovery (NCCR) rider while Plant Vogtle Units 3 & 4 have been under construction for the last 14 years. Large industrial customers, on the other hand, have been largely exempt from the NCCR rider and have only contributed around 10%.
Equal is not the same as equitable! Instead of considering what residential and small business customers have already paid toward Units 3 & 4, the PSC approved a negotiated settlement that allocates the associated rate increase equally across all base rate tariffs. This was the biggest disappointment from today’s PSC decision.
The precedent for this was set with another negotiated settlement in 2021. Back then, Georgia Power argued that “equal” allocation was the best they could do without performing a cost-of-service study. That might have been excusable for the initial allocation but it’s dereliction-of-duty that Georgia Power didn’t perform the cost-of-service study two years later. And by letting them get away with it, the PSC is as guilty as they are.
The Vogtle cost recovery settlement that the PSC approved today does limit the total impact on ratepaying customers that are served by Georgia Power Company. Under the stipulation, the Company’s shareholders will be absorbing about half of the exorbitant cost overruns. The final figure approved for inclusion into Georgia Power’s rate base will be $7.562 Billion of capital and construction costs (not including finance cost). The Company had initially requested $8.826 billion (and its share for the total capital and construction cost is upward of $10 billion.) So the impact could have been even worse. Still, however, rates for a typical residential customer will increase by an additional 5%. This will add to the severe energy burden many Georgians already experience.
SACE acknowledges some valid attempts in the stipulation to provide or expand savings opportunities for customers. The commitment to expand demand-side management programs, like energy efficiency, after 2025 is a welcome addition. And SACE is pleased that the Income Qualified Senior Discount will no longer be limited exclusively to seniors. But SACE is disappointed that the stipulation neglects other opportunities to prepare Georgia’s power grid for more clean energy generation and protect ratepayers from costly mistakes like Vogtle in the future.
The post Dereliction of Duty appeared first on SACE | Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.
Renewable Energy
Understanding Pete Hegseth
What is said here about Pete Hegseth is clearly true.
But keep in mind that he’s fiercely loyal to Donald Trump, and Trump couldn’t possibly care what happens to the United States, as long as he can stay out of prison and enrich himself and his family.
Renewable Energy
Does Clean Energy Reduce Your Energy Bills?
Here’s an article that outlines how the EU has lowered energy prices via its investment in renewables.
In truth, the economics of all this is complicated. In most of the world, there are subsidies for clean energy, just as there are subsidies for Big Oil. If you want to remove the environmental regulations of coal-fired power plants and let them make fortunes by turning our atmosphere into their own private sewers, you can probably make coal-powered energy very inexpensive.
One thing is clear though, looking through all this complexity: the countries whose people actually care about the future of life on Earth are aggressively decarbonizing their energy and transportation sectors, and there is a great deal to be said for this.
In the United States, we’re rapidly going in the other direction. Shame on us.
Renewable Energy
Another Concept in Small Wind
These guys have an innovation in small wind: their turbine “furls up” in dangerously high wind conditions, making it “perfect for your backyard.” Check out this video. The competition has to shut down to avoid having their product destroyed in such circumstances.
Think about this for a second. How often do you have hurricane-force winds blowing through your backyard? What if it’s a tornado? (It’s a twister! It’s a twister!) What would be the cost to you if your mini-turbine actually did have to shut down a few hours each year?
These guys are looking for investors. If their pitch resonates with you, jump on in, by all means.
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Renewable Energy6 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
