Botswana’s new climate plan focuses on adapting to drought, floods and cyclones over cutting planet-heating gases, in a move praised by African climate negotiators as a model that low-emitting vulnerable countries should follow.
The government plan – or nationally determined contribution (NDC) – submitted to the UN on Christmas Eve, does not significantly strengthen a 2030 emissions-cutting goal from an earlier version, but adds specific targets to promote adaptation measures like rooftop water storage tanks and drought-tolerant crops and cows.
As part of the 2015 Paris climate agreement, all countries are supposed to submit stronger NDCs every five years. While a handful have done so already in the latest round, most of the 194 signatories to the accord will put forward their third plan this year. Having failed to submit an updated plan like most nations did around 2020, Botswana’s new NDC is only its second.
Its government said in the document that “as Botswana is one of the lowest emitters of [greenhouse gases] in the world, the limited financial resources available will be prioritised for adaptation to reduce the country’s vulnerability to the impacts of climate change”.
The southern African country plans to spend $2.1 billion on adapting and $0.9 billion on cutting emissions by 2030. If it gets foreign funding and support, it says it will spend an extra $0.4 billion on adaptation and $2.7 billion more on mitigation through things like solar power and biogas plants.
Fatuma Hussein, a Kenyan climate negotiator for the African Group, which represents the continent at UN climate talks, said Botswana’s approach is “laudable” and reflects the “unique circumstances and challenges faced by many African countries” which emit very low levels of greenhouse gases but face extreme climate impacts.
“For a country with minimal global emissions, this focus makes sense,” Hussein said, although she added that African countries should not neglect measures to curb emissions as projects like renewable energy and sustainable agriculture can make them more resilient to climate warming as well as slowing it down.
Julius Mbatia, a fellow Kenyan negotiator, said priorities for vulnerable developing countries must reflect “their lived circumstances” in the world of climate cooperation “where their voice is barely heard” nor their asks for climate finance for a just and resilient transition “accorded due seriousness”.
Tipping point
Botswana’s plan, developed by the meteorological services department with support from the United Nations, warns that “based on the harsh semi-arid environment, acute water scarcity and fragile ecosystems, Botswana is already at a tipping point”.
“Climate change could be the defining parameter to tip the scale to irreversible disastrous points for the country and its people,” it adds.
In particular, it reports annual heatwaves, severe droughts, flooding from tropical cyclones coming off the Indian Ocean and winter cold fronts, and destructive hailstorms. The plan includes over 50 numerical targets on how to adapt to these threats.
To tackle drought, the government aims to connect all feasible settlements to water pipelines, encourage desalination plants, reduce water waste and triple the percentage of public buildings with water storage tanks.
It also aims to reduce the livestock mortality rate from 25% to 10%. One way it plans to do this is by encouraging the Mosi breed of cow, which can survive with less food and water.
The country has been importing more cattle that are better able to withstand drought and disease from Texas and breeding them with local cattle using artificial insemination in a UN-backed programme.
Similarly, Botswana plans to distribute drought-tolerant seeds to half of its smallholder farmers and three-quarters of commercial farmers.
Warnings and maintenance
So that it can warn people about storms and floods, the government plans to expand the number of automated weather stations on its soil from 19 to 600, and produce seasonal weather forecasts for all districts.
It also aims to keep all drainage systems and government infrastructure well-maintained, and ensure that all new buildings are “climate smart” and use “climate-proof materials”.
The plan maintains the country’s target, set in its first NDC in 2016, to cut emissions by 15% by 2030 compared with a business-as-usual projection.
To help achieve this, it sets new targets – not included in the previous five-page NDC – for specific emissions-reduction measures. These include replacing 2 million incandescent lightbulbs with more energy-efficient LED bulbs and installing 20,000 solar water pumps.
Global goal on adaptation
Over the next year, every government signed up to the Paris Agreement is supposed to produce a more ambitious NDC climate plan with a 2035 target to reduce emissions. Hussein said she also expects Botswana to submit another NDC.
Of the handful of mainly larger nations – including climate summit hosts Brazil and the United Arab Emirates – to have released their plan so far, none have set numerical adaptation targets like Botswana does.
At November’s COP30 climate conference in Brazil, nations are due to agree on indicators to measure progress under a “Global Goal on Adaptation”. National targets put forward by developing countries are feeding into this process and are likely to continue to do so.
Commenting on the UN climate talks, Mbatia of Kenya said more work is needed to define effective ways to measure adaptation.
“The world must now discuss methodologies and practices of determining the adequacy of adaptation targets set and assessing progress in implementing adaptation actions,” he added.
(Reporting by Joe Lo and Vivian Chime; editing by Megan Rowling)
The post With drought-hardy cows, Botswana prioritises adaptation in new climate plan appeared first on Climate Home News.
With drought-hardy cows, Botswana prioritises adaptation in new climate plan
Climate Change
Greenpeace Australia Pacific settles in lawsuit against Woodside
SYDNEY, Wednesday 22 April 2026 — A settlement has been agreed in a lawsuit brought by Greenpeace Australia Pacific against fossil fuel multinational Woodside, being heard in the Federal Court of Australia.
Greenpeace Australia Pacific filed the lawsuit against Woodside in December 2023, alleging the fossil fuel giant had misrepresented both its prior emissions reductions, and its emissions reductions targets for 2025, 2030, and 2050.
Greenpeace alleged, among other things, that Woodside represented that its emissions reduction targets will achieve substantial reductions in its actual scope 1 and scope 2 emissions, when in fact Woodside will rely heavily on offsets to achieve a decrease in net emissions.
Greenpeace also alleged that Woodside represented that its emissions reduction targets are consistent with what the most recent climate science sets out as necessary to meet the temperature goals of the Paris Agreement when in fact Woodside’s emissions reduction targets do not include Woodside’s scope 3 emissions (which account for over 90% of Woodside’s emissions) and Woodside has plans to significantly expand its oil and gas production and processing and thereby the sum of its actual scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions would not materially decrease by 2030 and may increase past 2030.
Greenpeace filed expert evidence which it alleges supported its claim and demonstrated why Woodside’s claims were misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive.
Woodside has since changed how it represents its strategy to respond to climate change. For example, initially, Woodside displayed a ‘Net zero by 2050 or sooner’ banner on its website, but around July 2025, Woodside removed the banner from its website.
Joe Rafalowicz, Head of Climate and Energy at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said:
“Greenpeace Australia Pacific cares about transparent and accurate climate disclosures, and in December 2023, took Woodside to court challenging its claims.
“During the course of the case, Woodside changed how it was presenting its plans on carbon emissions from what they had said prior to us bringing this case. We take that as a win and have decided to continue the fight against fossil fuel corporations outside of the courts.
“Settling this case does not signal the end of our fight against Woodside’s climate and nature-destroying gas projects. While we may have agreed to resolve our court action against Woodside, in which we alleged it made misleading and deceptive claims to investors regarding its climate plans, the fact is the court of public opinion will judge Woodside for the harm it inflicts on our climate.
“Woodside’s greed-driven appetite to expand fossil fuel production is accelerating the climate crisis, putting the environment and communities at risk.
“Greenpeace strongly supports public interest litigation as a crucial tool in democratic engagement to protect our planet and holding large corporations accountable for their contributions to climate change.
“Investors and the public deserve accurate information about a company’s true climate impact and strategy, especially when those strategies are presented as ‘Paris-aligned’ — an absurd claim for a company responsible for one of the largest LNG export terminals in Australia, and now the United States.
“The expansion of fossil fuels is incompatible with a 1.5C-aligned world — Greenpeace will continue to campaign to fast-track the transition to homegrown, clean, affordable wind and solar energy, the only solution to the energy crisis we are currently all facing globally.”
Greenpeace and Woodside agreed for the proceeding to be dismissed on the basis that each party bears its own costs.
-ENDS-
Media contact
Kate O’Callaghan on 0406 231 892 or kate.ocallaghan@greenpeace.org
Kimberley Bernard on 0407 581 404 or kbernard@greenpeace.org
Greenpeace Australia Pacific settles in lawsuit against Woodside
Climate Change
Sewage Is Threatening Coral Reefs Around the World, Even in Marine Protected Areas
A new study finds that more than 70 percent of these protected zones are exposed to high levels of wastewater pollutants, making corals and other marine life more vulnerable to climate change.
Marine protected areas are designed to conserve coral reefs and other ocean ecosystems by restricting human activity within their boundaries. But most don’t account for one of the most severe and widespread threats to marine life that originates on land: sewage.
Sewage Is Threatening Coral Reefs Around the World, Even in Marine Protected Areas
Climate Change
Trump’s Environmental Cuts Further Marginalize Vulnerable Communities
In Florida, majority Black and brown communities face hotter temperatures, rising seas and more damaging storms. One advocacy group is considering other ways of helping them.
Since returning to the White House for his second term, President Donald Trump and his administration have drastically cut environmental programs and programs designed to serve disadvantaged communities and communities of color. These are groups with the fewest resources to deal with climate impacts such as hotter temperatures and more damaging storms.
Trump’s Environmental Cuts Further Marginalize Vulnerable Communities
-
Greenhouse Gases9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change9 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Renewable Energy6 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
