Critical minerals, including lithium, nickel, cobalt, copper, and rare earths, are essential in the manufacturing of clean energy technologies, spanning from wind turbines to electric vehicles (EVs). Over the last two decades, the annual trade in energy-related critical minerals has surged from $53 billion to $378 billion.
However, US imports of lithium materials and critical minerals, crucial components for EV batteries, saw a decline in 2023 compared to the previous year, per data from S&P Global Market Intelligence. This reflects the subdued demand for EVs.
In 2023, imports of processed and refined lithium totaled 17,130 and 57,210 metric tons, respectively, marking decreases of 2.4% and 20.5% compared to 2022, as reported by Market Intelligence data.
US processed lithium imports saw an uptick in the 4th quarter of 2023 following a rise in the 3rd quarter. However, import levels remained below the record high set in the March quarter of the same year.
The first quarter of 2023 witnessed a record in US imports of lithium-ion batteries as seen in the chart below. This is primarily due to market anticipation of robust EV sales for the year ahead.

Factors Behind US Import Decline of Critical Minerals
Analysts attribute the subdued sales growth in Europe and the US during the second half of 2023 to various factors. These include a higher interest rate environment and a greater price premium for battery electric vehicles compared to internal combustion engine vehicles.
However, there are expectations for an uptick in EV demand in 2024.
According to a February report by S&P Global Mobility, the development of battery-electric vehicle (BEV) sales in the US is expected to continue to grow through 2024. This projection nearly doubles the number of BEV models available by the end of the year compared to 2022.
While it’s true that growth in the global EV market has been decelerating, it’s crucial to maintain the right perspective. In 2021, EV sales more than doubled, experiencing an extraordinary growth rate of nearly 120%.

Remarkably, in January of this year, over 1.1 million EVs were sold worldwide, compared to 660,000 sold during the same period last year, marking a new monthly global sales record. This represents a remarkable 69% year-over-year growth, significantly surpassing the average growth rate observed in the previous year.
This growth trend in EV sales means lithium production must also keep up.
Trends in US Lithium Imports and Battery Market
In the fourth quarter of 2023, US imports of processed lithium totaled 4,026 metric tons, marking a 6.8% increase year over year. Market Intelligence data reveals that Argentina and Chile contributed 51.6% and 46.1% of these imports, respectively.
Raw lithium undergoes processing and subsequent refinement into chemicals suitable for use as cathode materials and electrolyte solutions in batteries. During the December quarter, the US imported 15,960 metric tons of refined lithium. That represents a 3.5% increase from the 15,426 metric tons imported during the same period in 2022.
Canada accounted for 63.4% of the US imports of refined lithium in the fourth quarter, according to the data.
According to forecasts from Commodity Insights, China would see a decline in its market share in lithium-ion battery production between 2023 and 2030.
Meanwhile, North America’s lithium-ion battery capacity is anticipated to grow at a rate of 22% during this period. The bulk of this growth would take place in the United States, with two projects also slated for Canada.
- READ MORE: Accelerating Lithium Demand and Construction Surge in US and Canada
Additionally, US imports of critical minerals amounted to 612,590 metric tons in 2023. That represents a significant decline of 39.1% year over year.
US Dependency in Critical Mineral Imports
Market Intelligence data further reveals that critical mineral imports totaled 195,805 metric tons in the 4th quarter of 2023. That accounts for a 6.6% increase from the 183,621 metric tons recorded in the fourth quarter of 2022. Notably, Gabon accounted for 47.1% of US imports of critical minerals during the same quarter.
Globally, trade in critical minerals has experienced substantial growth over the past two decades, with an average annual growth rate of 10%. The value of imports has nearly doubled in five years, soaring from $212 billion in 2017 to $378 billion in 2022, according to World Trade Organization data.
Particularly noteworthy is the significant increase in trade in helium and lithium which showed impressive annual growth rates of up to 53% during the same period.
In 2022, China emerged as the largest importer of critical minerals, comprising 33% of the global total. Following China, the European Union accounted for 16%, while Japan and the United States both stood at 11%.

The transition towards a more sustainable future necessitates access to various critical minerals vital for transitioning to the green economy. However, the US currently faces a significant reliance on imported nonfuel minerals, potentially exposing vulnerabilities in the nation’s supply chains.
According to data from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the United States is entirely dependent on imports for at least 12 key minerals identified as critical by the government. Notably, China emerges as the primary source of imports for many of these critical minerals, as well as numerous others.

The graphic illustrates America’s import dependence for 30 key nonfuel minerals, highlighting the primary import sources for each mineral.
The decline in US critical minerals imports amidst EV market fluctuations underscores supply chain complexities. Despite subdued demand in 2023, projections suggest future growth. Global trade in critical minerals surges, emphasizing the need for strategic domestic resource management to secure a stable supply for the green economy.
The post US Imports of Lithium and Critical Minerals Drop Amidst Shifting EV Market appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

