Ever since Trump came to power, there have been serious speculations about the future of America from a climate perspective. We saw clean energy stocks tumbling like a pack of cards and Trump’s “drill, baby, drill” policies eventually taking shape.
Well, at this conjecture Reuters came up with an interesting report explaining that Donald Trump’s energy team is planning an aggressive agenda to reshape U.S. energy policy. He will prioritize expanding liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports, increasing offshore oil drilling, and streamlining permits for federal land projects.
These actions signal a dramatic shift from the Biden administration’s climate-focused pro-renewables policies. Let’s deep dive into what’s on Trump’s agenda…
Fast-Tracking LNG Exports, Restart Oil and Drilling
The report further highlighted that under the Biden administration, several significant LNG projects were delayed. Venture Global’s CP2, Commonwealth LNG, and Energy Transfer’s Lake Charles facility all of them are based in Louisiana. Trump wants to de-freeze and approve these projects which would send a strong message of support for the natural gas sector.
Federal records revealed,
“Five U.S. LNG export projects that have been approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission are still awaiting permit approvals at the Department of Energy (DOE).”
The U.S., as the leading LNG exporter, plays a key role in global energy. With Europe seeking U.S. gas to cut reliance on Russia, Trump aims to seize the opportunity. This means there would be faster approvals, unlocking massive LNG infrastructure investments.

- EIA notes, that in 2023 the U.S. LNG exports averaged 11.9 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d)—a 12% increase (1.3 Bcf/d) compared with 2022.
Notably, Trump’s team also aims to accelerate oil and gas drilling off the U.S. coast and on federal lands. Federal lands currently account for a quarter of U.S. oil production and 12% of natural gas output.
During his first term, drilling permits took significantly less time to process compared to the Biden administration. This time he plans to reinstate a concrete long-term drilling plan that would expand offshore lease sales and fast-track all permit approvals to increase energy product. His focus will primarily be on regions having rich oil reserves.
Now taking about the stats, Reuters reported,
“According to federal data, oil output on federal lands and waters hit a record in 2023, while gas production reached its highest level since 2016.”
The report also revealed that Trump is most likely to persuade the IEA on pro-oil decisions. However, his advisors have urged him to suppress funding unless the IEA adopts a more pro-oil stance.
Dan Eberhart, CEO of oilfield service firm Canary said,
“I have pushed Trump in person and his team generally on pressuring the IEA to return to its core mission of energy security and to pivot away from greenwashing.”
A symbolic yet bold move would be Trump’s push to approve the Keystone XL pipeline, a project canceled downrightly by Biden. However, reviving the pipeline has challenges, as land easements have been returned and construction would require starting from scratch. Even so, Trump’s endorsement signals a commitment to fossil fuel infrastructure.
Trump’s Stance on Inflation Reduction Act: A “Green Scam”?
Prior to his win, we have read and seen all around how he openly criticized the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), calling it a “green scam”. He also pledged to repeal it if he returned to power once again.
This bold statement has raised questions about the future of the Biden administration’s $369 billion energy transition agenda. While his rhetoric may signal trouble for renewable energy sectors like electric vehicles (EVs) and wind power, Trump’s track record suggests a more nuanced approach to industrial policy and critical mineral supply chains.
But Critical Minerals are Safe in Trump’s Hands…
The IRA has funneled significant resources into renewable energy, but it also supports rebuilding America’s industrial base. For instance, $75 million was allocated to upgrade Constellium’s aluminum rolling mill in West Virginia. Efforts like these align with Trump’s earlier policies emphasizing industrial revitalization and reduced reliance on foreign nations for critical resources.
In 2020, Trump declared the United States’ dependence on foreign critical minerals a national emergency. A second Trump administration is unlikely to abandon this push for metal self-sufficiency. Instead, he may amplify efforts to boost domestic production of key materials like aluminum, nickel, and lithium.
The good news is cross-party consensus on this issue suggests that funding for industrial projects tied to critical minerals may be safe, even under a Republican administration.
America First: China in Scrutiny
Both the Department of Energy (DOE) and the Department of Defense (DOD) have prioritized investments in rebuilding U.S. metals capacity. While the DOE focuses on EV battery metals like lithium, the DOD has diversified its investments toward antimony to zirconium. All these moves align toward reducing dependency on China for critical minerals.
Projects like Talon Metals’ Tamarack nickel initiative in Minnesota have already received federal funding. However, the nickel market faces significant challenges due to Indonesia’s mining boom, which has driven down prices. Most of Indonesia’s nickel production is controlled by Chinese entities, complicating matters for U.S. companies like Ford, which are sourcing Indonesian nickel for EV batteries.
Trump’s “America First” philosophy highlights his strong opposition to critical metal imports from China. His administration will probably scrutinize even joint ventures like Ford’s collaboration with Indonesia’s Vale and Huayou Cobalt. Even if these ventures technically qualify for IRA subsidies, their ties to Chinese supply chains may face new barriers under his administration.
Can America Be Great Again?
Despite Trump’s bitterness about the IRA, his administration may continue supporting parts of it that align with domestic industrial goals. Consequently building U.S. mineral independence will significantly reduce reliance on China and secure advanced technology materials.
Concisely, this means a second Trump presidency might prioritize America’s self-sufficiency while addressing IRA’s initiatives to fit in his “Make America Great Again” agenda.
This report suggests that Trump’s policies could possibly reinforce a robust U.S. oil, gas, and critical minerals industry. While his decision on renewables like EVs and tariffs on imports are still uncertain, he prioritizes critical minerals which is assuring for national security and economic competitiveness.
Sources:
- Exclusive: Trump prepares wide-ranging energy plan to boost gas exports, oil drilling, sources say | Reuters
- Trump 2.0 won’t reverse Biden’s critical minerals push | Reuters
The post Trump’s Tactic to Make America Great Again: Expanding Domestic Oil, Gas, and Critical Minerals appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Climate Impact Partners Unveils High-Quality Carbon Credits from Sabah Rainforest in Malaysia
The voluntary carbon market is changing. Buyers are no longer focused only on large volumes of cheap credits. Instead, they want projects with strong science, long-term monitoring, and clear proof that carbon has truly been removed from the atmosphere. That shift is drawing more attention to high-integrity, nature-based projects.
One project now gaining that spotlight is the Sabah INFAPRO rainforest rehabilitation project in Malaysia. Climate Impact Partners announced that the project is now issuing verified carbon removal credits, opening access to one of the highest-quality nature-based removals currently available in the global market.
Restoring One of the World’s Richest Rainforest Ecosystems
The project is located in Sabah, Malaysia, on the island of Borneo. This region is home to tropical dipterocarp rainforest, one of the richest forest ecosystems on Earth. These forests store huge amounts of carbon and support extraordinary biodiversity. Some dipterocarp trees can grow up to 70 meters tall, creating habitat for orangutans, pygmy elephants, gibbons, sun bears, and the critically endangered Sumatran rhino.
However, the forest within the INFAPRO project area was not intact. In the 1980s, selective logging removed many of the most valuable tree species, especially large dipterocarps. That caused serious ecological damage. Once the key mother trees were gone, natural regeneration became much harder. Young seedlings also had to compete with dense vines and shrubs, which slowed the forest’s recovery.
To repair that damage, the INFAPRO project was launched in the Ulu-Segama forestry management unit in eastern Sabah.
- The project has restored more than 25,000 hectares of logged-over rainforest.
- It was developed by Face the Future in cooperation with Yayasan Sabah, while Climate Impact Partners has supported the project and helped bring its credits to market.
Why Sabah’s Carbon Removals are Attracting Attention
What makes Sabah INFAPRO different is not only the size of the restoration effort. It is also the way the project measured carbon gains.

Many forest carbon projects issue credits in annual vintages based on year-by-year growth estimates. Sabah INFAPRO followed a different path. It used a landscape-scale monitoring system and waited until the forest moved through its strongest natural growth period before issuing removal credits.
- This approach gives the credits more weight. Rather than relying mainly on short-term annual estimates, the project measured carbon sequestration over a longer period. That helps show that the forest delivered real, sustained, and measurable carbon removal.
The scientific backing is also unusually strong. Since 2007, the project has maintained nearly 400 permanent monitoring plots. These plots have allowed researchers, independent auditors, and technical specialists to observe the full growth cycle of dipterocarp forest recovery. The result is a large body of field data that supports carbon calculations and strengthens confidence in the credits.
In simple terms, buyers are not just being asked to trust a model. They are being shown years of direct forest monitoring across the project landscape.
Strong Ratings Support Market Confidence
Independent assessment has also lifted the project’s profile. BeZero awarded Sabah INFAPRO an A.pre overall rating and an AA score for permanence. That places the project among the highest-rated Improved Forest Management, or IFM, projects in the world.
The rating reflects several important strengths. First, the project has very low exposure to reversal risk. Second, it has a long and stable operating history. Third, its measured carbon gains align well with peer-reviewed ecological research and independent analysis.
These points matter in today’s market. Buyers have become more cautious after years of debate over the quality of some forest carbon credits. As a result, they now look more closely at durability, transparency, and third-party validation. Sabah INFAPRO’s rating helps answer those concerns and makes the project more attractive to companies looking for credible carbon removal.
The project is also registered with Verra’s Verified Carbon Standard under the name INFAPRO Rehabilitation of Logged-over Dipterocarp Forest in Sabah, Malaysia. That adds another level of market recognition and verification.
A Wider Model for Rainforest Recovery
Sabah INFAPRO also shows why high-quality nature-based projects are about more than carbon alone. The restoration effort supports broader ecological recovery in one of the world’s most important rainforest regions.
Climate Impact Partners said it has worked with project partners to restore degraded areas, run local training programs, carry out monthly forest patrols, and distribute seedlings to support rainforest recovery beyond the project boundary. These efforts help strengthen the wider landscape and expand the project’s environmental impact.
That broader value is becoming more important for buyers. Companies increasingly want projects that support biodiversity, ecosystem health, and local engagement, along with carbon removal. Sabah INFAPRO offers that mix, making it a stronger fit for the market’s shift toward higher-integrity credits.

The post Climate Impact Partners Unveils High-Quality Carbon Credits from Sabah Rainforest in Malaysia appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Bitcoin Falls as Energy Prices Rise: Why Crypto Is Now an Energy Market Story
Bitcoin’s recent drop below $70,000 reflects more than short-term market pressure. It signals a deeper shift. The world’s largest cryptocurrency is becoming increasingly tied to global energy markets.
For years, Bitcoin has moved mainly on investor sentiment, adoption trends, and regulation. Today, another force is shaping its direction: the cost of energy.
As oil prices rise and electricity markets tighten, Bitcoin is starting to behave less like a tech asset and more like an energy-dependent system. This shift is changing how investors, analysts, and policymakers understand crypto.
A Global Power Consumer: Inside Bitcoin’s Energy Use
Bitcoin depends on mining, a process that uses powerful computers to verify transactions. These machines run continuously and consume large amounts of electricity.
Data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration shows Bitcoin mining used between 67 and 240 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity in 2023, with a midpoint estimate of about 120 TWh.

Other estimates place consumption closer to 170 TWh per year in 2025. This accounts for roughly 0.5% of global electricity demand. Recently, as of February 2026, estimates see Bitcoin’s energy use reaching over 200 TWh per year.
That level of energy use is significant. Global electricity demand reached about 27,400 TWh in 2023. Bitcoin’s share may seem small, but it is comparable to the power use of mid-sized countries.
The network also requires steady power. Estimates suggest it draws around 10 gigawatts continuously, similar to several large power plants operating at full capacity. This constant demand makes energy costs central to Bitcoin’s economics.
When Oil Rises, Bitcoin Falls
Bitcoin mining is highly sensitive to electricity prices. Energy is the highest operating cost for miners. When power becomes more expensive, profit margins shrink.
Recent market movements show this link clearly. As oil prices rise and inflation concerns persist, energy costs have increased. At the same time, Bitcoin prices have weakened, falling below the $70,000 level.

This is not a coincidence. Studies show a direct relationship between Bitcoin prices, mining activity, and electricity use. When Bitcoin prices rise, more miners join the network, increasing energy demand. When energy costs rise, less efficient miners may shut down, reducing activity and adding selling pressure.
This creates a feedback loop between crypto and energy markets. Bitcoin is no longer driven only by demand and speculation. It is now influenced by the same forces that affect oil, gas, and power prices.
Cleaner Energy Use Is Growing, but Fossil Fuels Still Matter
Bitcoin’s environmental impact depends on its energy mix. This mix is improving, but it remains uneven.
A 2025 study from the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance found that 52.4% of Bitcoin mining now uses sustainable energy. This includes both renewable sources (42.6%) and nuclear power (9.8%). The share has risen significantly from about 37.6% in 2022.
Despite this progress, fossil fuels still account for a large portion of mining energy. Natural gas alone makes up about 38.2%, while coal continues to contribute a smaller share.

This reliance on fossil fuels keeps emissions high. Current estimates suggest Bitcoin produces more than 114 million tons of carbon dioxide each year. That puts it in line with emissions from some industrial sectors.
The shift toward cleaner energy is real, but it is not complete. The pace of change will play a key role in how Bitcoin fits into global climate goals.
Bitcoin’s Climate Debate Intensifies
Bitcoin’s growing energy demand has placed it at the center of ESG discussions. Its impact is often measured through three key areas:
- Total electricity use, which rivals that of entire countries.
- Carbon emissions are estimated at over 100 million tons of CO₂ annually.
- Energy intensity, with a single transaction using large amounts of power.

At the same time, the industry is evolving. Mining companies are adopting more efficient hardware and exploring new energy sources. Some operations use excess renewable power or capture waste energy, such as flare gas from oil fields.
These efforts show progress, but they do not fully address the concerns. The gap between Bitcoin’s energy use and its environmental impact remains a key issue for investors and regulators.
- MUST READ: Bitcoin Price Hits All-Time High Above $126K: ETFs, Market Drivers, and the Future of Digital Gold
Bitcoin Is Becoming Part of the Energy System
Bitcoin mining is now closely integrated with the broader energy system. Operators often choose locations based on access to cheap or excess electricity. This includes areas with strong renewable generation or underused energy resources.
This integration creates both opportunities and challenges. On one hand, mining can support energy systems by using power that might otherwise go to waste. It can also provide flexible demand that helps stabilize grids.
On the other hand, it can increase pressure on local electricity supplies and extend the use of fossil fuels if cleaner options are not available.
In the United States, Bitcoin mining could account for up to 2.3% of total electricity demand in certain scenarios. This highlights how quickly the sector is scaling and how closely it is tied to national energy systems.
Energy Markets Are Now Key to Bitcoin’s Future
Looking ahead, the connection between Bitcoin and energy is expected to grow stronger. The network’s computing power, or hash rate, continues to reach new highs, which typically leads to higher energy use.
Electricity will remain the main cost for miners. This means Bitcoin will continue to respond to changes in energy prices and supply conditions. At the same time, governments are starting to pay closer attention to crypto’s environmental impact, which could shape future regulations.

Some forecasts suggest Bitcoin’s energy use could rise sharply if adoption increases, potentially reaching up to 400 TWh in extreme scenarios. However, cleaner energy systems could reduce the carbon impact over time.
Bitcoin is no longer just a financial asset. It is also a large-scale energy consumer and a growing part of the global power system.
As a result, understanding Bitcoin now requires a broader view. Energy prices, electricity markets, and carbon trends are becoming just as important as market demand and investor sentiment.
The message is clear. As energy markets move, Bitcoin is likely to move with them.
The post Bitcoin Falls as Energy Prices Rise: Why Crypto Is Now an Energy Market Story appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
LEGO’s Virginia Factory Goes Big on Solar as Net-Zero Push Speeds Up
The post LEGO’s Virginia Factory Goes Big on Solar as Net-Zero Push Speeds Up appeared first on Carbon Credits.
-
Greenhouse Gases7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Renewable Energy2 years ago
GAF Energy Completes Construction of Second Manufacturing Facility








