Connect with us

Published

on

Re: Trump’s action here, a reader remarks:

Same as his first term following Obama. Just reverse everything good or bad to eliminate any legacy of their time as President. It is also important that the opposing political party’s successes be forgotten so they can’t score favorably in future elections.

There is clearly a lot of truth here.

I would only add that there is also a motivation to excite the far-right-wing, especially the anti-intellectual MAGA crowd.  Promote white nationalism.  Pardon violent pro-Trump criminals.  Punish the immigrants.  Destroy the environment and bake the planet.  Kill public education.  Jettison medical science.

In any case, this is a tragedy for 99+% of Americans, and less directly, for all the world’s people and its other life forms.   The United States is led by a man whose only concern is his own wealth and power, who is completely happy to inflict suffering on his country’s people if doing serves his own ends.

Trump’s Motivations for his Current Actions

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

The Positive Effects We’ve Had on Others Are Profound, Whether We Know It or Not

Published

on

There’s a theory that most people underestimate the positive effects they’ve had on other people.

Yes, that’s the theme of “It’s a Wonderful Life,” but it’s also the core of the 1995 film “Mr. Holland’s Opus,” in which a music teacher who deemed that his life had been a failure because he never completed writing a great symphony, is gently and beautifully corrected. Please see below.

The Positive Effects We’ve Had on Others Are Profound, Whether We Know It or Not

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Renewable Energy Concepts Can’t Violate the Laws of Physics

Published

on

In the early days of 2GreenEnergy, my people and I were vigorously engaged in finding solid ideas in cleantech that needed funding in order to move forward.

I vividly remember a conversation with a guy in Maryland who was trying to explain the (ostensible) breakthrough that he and his team had made in hydrokinetics. When I was having trouble visualizing what we was talking about, he asked me to “think of it as a river in a box.”

“Oh!” I exclaimed. “You mean you take a box full of standing water, add energy to it get it moving, then extract that energy, leaving you with more energy that you added to it.”

“Exactly.”

I politely explained that the laws of physics, specifically the first and second laws of thermodynamics, make this impossible.

He wasn’t through, however, and insisted that, in his office, his people had constructed a “working model.”

Here’s where my tone descended into something less than 100% polite. I told him that he may think he has a working model, but he’s wrong; if he believes this, he’s ignorant; if he doesn’t, but is conducting this conversation anyway, he’s a fraud.

“But don’t you want to come see it?” he implored.

“No. Not only would not fly across the country to see whatever it is you claim to have built, I wouldn’t walk across the street to a “working model” of something that is theoretically impossible.”

I tell this story because the claim made at the upper left is essentially identical.  You’re pumping water up out of a stream, and then claiming to extract more energy when the water flows back into the stream.

Of course, social media today is rife with complete crap like this.  We’ve devolved to a point where defrauding money out of idiots is rapidly replacing baseball as our national pastime.

Renewable Energy Concepts Can’t Violate the Laws of Physics

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

What Canada Has that the U.S. Doesn’t

Published

on

Until recently, I would have moose, maple syrup, and frozen tundra.

Now I would say: decency, honesty, and class.

What Canada Has that the U.S. Doesn’t

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com