TotalEnergies signed a 10-year deal to supply 800 GWh of renewable electricity to SWM International. SWM is a big paper maker in France. The contract began in January 2026 and will cover electricity for three industrial sites over a decade. This deal marks another step in TotalEnergies’ push to expand its clean power business and help heavy industries reduce carbon emissions.
Under the agreement, TotalEnergies will deliver renewable electricity with a stable output profile, also known as clean firm power. This means SWM will receive low-carbon electricity that meets its energy needs around the clock. The supply will come from around 50 megawatts (MW) of renewable energy assets that TotalEnergies already has in France.
SWM says the deal will provide about half of its electricity needs in France and strengthen its plan to cut Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by 2033. The long-term contract also gives SWM better cost predictability and support for its decarbonization goals.
Giuliano Scilio, SWM’s Vice President and Chief Information Officer, stated in the release:
“For an energy-intensive industry like ours, this isn’t just an environmental milestone; it’s a strategic investment that gives us cost predictability and strengthens our ability to offer customers genuinely sustainable solutions.”
TotalEnergies’ Clean Energy Strategy
TotalEnergies has been expanding its renewable power business in recent years. The company blends renewable sources, like solar and wind, with flexible assets. These include gas turbines and storage.
This way, the oil giant provides customized clean energy solutions for industrial and corporate clients. These solutions are known as “Clean Firm Power.” They provide stable, low-carbon electricity that meets demand all day long.
As of late October 2025, TotalEnergies had more than 32 gigawatts (GW) of installed gross renewable electricity capacity. The company plans to hit 35 GW by the end of 2025. By 2030, it aims to generate over 100 terawatt-hours (TWh) of net electricity. This will include renewable and flexible power sources.
This clean power offering is part of a broader shift within TotalEnergies. The company is moving beyond its traditional oil and gas business to build a diverse portfolio of energy solutions. These include renewables, low-carbon hydrogen, biofuels, and electricity contracts. They help industrial clients meet climate goals while keeping operations reliable.
Big Deals, Big Impact
The SWM deal adds to the clean power contracts TotalEnergies has signed with big companies.

The chart shows TotalEnergies’ clean power deals from 2020 to 2026. Between 2020 and 2022, no large renewable contracts were publicly announced. Deals started increasing in 2023 with 850 GWh, then grew sharply in 2024 and 2025. Data for 2026 includes only this SWM deal.
In November 2025, TotalEnergies signed a 10-year deal to provide 610 GWh of renewable electricity to Data4. This contract begins in January 2026 and supports a European data center operator in Spain. This energy comes from wind and solar farms in Spain. It shows the rising need for clean power in digital infrastructure.
The oil major also signed a renewable electricity deal with Saint-Gobain. This agreement covers 875 GWh over five years, starting in 2026. It supports industrial decarbonization in France.
In December 2025, the company made a 21-year renewable power deal with Google. This agreement will provide 1 terawatt-hour (1 TWh) of certified renewable energy from a solar plant in Malaysia. This deal supports Google’s data-centre energy needs and renewable targets in Southeast Asia.
Taken together, these contracts show TotalEnergies’ growing role as a supplier of long-term clean energy to major corporate and industrial customers.
Why This Deal Matters for Industry Decarbonization
Long-term renewable power contracts like the SWM deal are important for several reasons:
-
Emission reductions:
Renewable power deals help companies reduce their Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions. Scope 1 covers direct emissions from operations. Scope 2 includes emissions from purchased electricity.
By securing renewable electricity, SWM expects to cut these emissions significantly on its way to net‑zero goals. In the SWM case, the clean power deal covers about half of its electricity needs and supports its target to reduce emissions by 2033.
-
Growing corporate demand:
Global corporate demand for clean energy continues to rise. In 2024, companies worldwide signed record volumes of renewable power purchase agreements (PPAs), with around 68 GW of deals announced. This was about 29% growth from the year before. Data centers, manufacturers, and heavy industries are some of the largest buyers of renewable energy.
-
Stable costs:
Long‑term contracts provide predictable power costs. They help companies plan budgets and capital spending. This is important where electricity prices change quickly or where energy costs are a large part of total expenses.
-
Clean energy growth:
Such power deals support more solar, wind, and low‑carbon energy on the grid. Across the world, renewable capacity is growing fast. In 2024, renewables accounted for nearly all new power installed, with solar and wind making up about 96% of new capacity. This expansion helps reduce reliance on fossil fuels.

-
Reliable power:
Clean firm power mixes renewable generation with flexible resources. This approach helps keep the electricity supply steady even when the sun isn’t shining or the wind isn’t blowing. TotalEnergies designs its contracts this way so heavy industrial users can run without interruptions.
The Growing Market for Clean Power
The market for renewable energy and long-term power contracts continues to grow worldwide. Corporate procurement of renewable energy via power purchase agreements (PPAs) hit record highs recently. The surge came from strong corporate climate commitments. It also rose due to higher electricity demand from data centers and industry.
In 2024, global corporate renewable power purchase agreements reached 68 GW of capacity. Big energy users, such as tech firms, manufacturers, and utilities, want to match their electricity use with clean energy. This growth reflects that demand.

By 2030, analysts expect renewable generation capacity to top 5,000 GW globally. That’s more than double the levels seen in 2024. Countries and companies are investing in clean energy to hit climate targets and boost energy security.
In this climate landscape, energy companies such as TotalEnergies are becoming integrated power suppliers. Their business model seeks to meet the growing corporate demand for stable, low-carbon electricity. Long-term clean power deals boost investment in new renewable projects. They also provide steady revenue for energy producers.
Providing Clean, Reliable Power to Users Globally
TotalEnergies’ 10-year, 800 GWh renewable electricity deal with SWM shows the company’s growing role in clean energy. The deal will help SWM cover half of its electricity needs with low-carbon sources. This supports its decarbonization goals through 2033.
TotalEnergies’ strategy mixes renewable energy with flexible assets. This approach provides clean, reliable power to industrial users globally. As renewable capacity grows and corporate demand increases, such long-term supply agreements will likely play a larger role in the global energy transition.
- READ MORE: Google and TotalEnergies Unlock Carbon-Free Future for Ohio Data Centers with 15-Year Solar Deal
The post TotalEnergies Inks Deal with SWM for 10-Year, 800 GWh Renewable Energy Deal appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
The real cost of 1 tonne of CO2: Translating carbon into hectares
Every business carbon footprint report ends with a number, the amount of carbon emissions produced by the business, less the amount of carbon reduced and offset, given in tonnes of CO₂. Many of the people who sign off on that number, including those who paid for it, cannot picture what it represents on the ground. A tonne is a unit of mass. CO₂ is invisible. The link between the amount offset in the report and a real piece of restored forest somewhere in the world is almost never indicated.
![]()
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

