Sungrow, a leader in PV inverters and energy storage, has connected 400 MWh of ENGIE’s 200 MW/800 MWh battery project in Vilvoorde, Belgium, to the grid. This marks the start of mainland Europe’s largest battery project, featuring 320 units of Sungrow’s PowerTitan liquid-cooled technology.
The company highlights that the second phase will be connected by late 2025. It will provide reliable, clean power to nearly 96,000 Belgian households. Located just north of Brussels, this project is a major step toward green energy and energy security for Belgium.
From Gas to Gigawatts: ENGIE’s Bold Battery Investment
Vilvoorde has been linked to electricity generation since the 1960s, mainly using fossil fuels. But ENGIE is transforming the 30-hectare site by adding a three-hectare battery park next to its gas plant.
Belgium’s Capacity Remuneration Mechanism (CRM) auctions began in 2021. They ensure enough supply to prevent shortages, especially in winter. ENGIE won the project through this mechanism. Construction started after Elia, the national grid operator, approved the plan in late 2023.
Moving on, the Vilvoorde battery park will launch in two phases, each with 100 MW, spaced three months apart. Phase one is already operational. Phase two should be completed by late 2025. ENGIE is investing €230–290 million. This project is the first of its size in continental Europe, outside the UK.
Vilvoorde Battery Park

Scaling Energy Storage
Belgium’s experience with energy storage has been limited to pilot projects, like the smaller Battery Park in Drogenbos. With Vilvoorde, ENGIE is moving from testing to large-scale deployment.
“This project shows One ENGIE in action,” said Quentin Renoy, ENGIE Belgium’s BESS Business Developer. “It’s about flexible generation and teamwork across market analysis, legal, and public relations.”
The battery park has a 15-year contract with Elia. This ensures a steady income while supporting Belgium’s renewable grid.
A Reliable Backup
While storage offers clean energy, Belgium still faces gaps between demand and renewable capacity. In October 2023, authorities confirmed that ENGIE’s former gas power plant in Vilvoorde will serve as a backup unit for three years, with options to extend.
This dual approach—using flexible storage and legacy plants—ensures Belgium can transition without supply shortages.
ENGIE also plans similar projects in Kallo (near Antwerp) and Drogenbos, expected to start in 2024.
Europe’s Modern Infrastructure for a Net-Zero Future
- Data shows that the European Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) market is expected to jump from US$18.1 billion in 2024 to US$87.34 billion by 2033, growing at a 19.11% CAGR.
This rise is attributed to increased renewable energy use, government support, and lower battery costs. BESS boosts energy efficiency by storing extra renewable power, helping grids stay stable.
Countries such as France, Germany, the UK, and Spain are rapidly expanding BESS to enhance grid resilience with innovative battery technologies.

The Vilvoorde project does more than provide electricity for households. It modernizes Europe’s energy infrastructure. By absorbing excess renewable power during high-production times and releasing it during peak demand, the system tackles clean energy’s biggest challenge: intermittency.
Large-scale Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) like this ensure stability, prevent grid congestion, and create a model for integrating renewables into existing grids across Europe.
Safe, Smart, and Scalable Technology
Both phases of the Vilvoorde project use Sungrow’s PowerTitan liquid-cooled storage units. These units have compact, modular designs that optimize land use and allow quick deployment.
They include intelligent cooling to maintain temperature stability, extend battery life, and reduce costs. This setup ensures safety, efficiency, and reliability.
Vincent Verbeke, CEO of ENGIE Belgium, said,
“With the first series of batteries now operational in Vilvoorde, ENGIE is delivering part of the additional flexibility the electricity grid requires to balance supply and demand. The efficient construction of this battery park is only possible thanks to strong partnerships. By working hand in hand with trusted and innovative partners such as Sungrow, we can continue to accelerate the integration of renewables into the grid, and help deliver a more reliable, sustainable and affordable energy system.”
Sungrow’s Growing Footprint in Europe
Sungrow has a solid presence in the BeNeLux region, providing technical support, sales, and after-sales services from local offices and its R&D center in Amsterdam. The company engages with the market through industry events like Intersolution and Laadinfra Congress, while hosting its own summits, such as the EV Charging Summit in Amsterdam.
This local presence ensures Sungrow delivers effective solutions to partners, reinforcing its commitment to Europe’s clean energy transition.
Globally, Sungrow has over 28 years of experience in renewable power solutions, having installed 870 GW of power electronic converters worldwide by June 2025. BloombergNEF consistently ranks Sungrow as the world’s most bankable PV inverter and energy storage provider.
Carbon Neutral Goals
The company has pledged to achieve operational carbon neutrality by 2028 (Scope 1 and 2 emissions) while managing Scope 3 emissions across its supply chain.

Its strategy includes:
- Phasing out fuel-powered vehicles and forklifts for electric alternatives.
- Electrifying all new canteens and eliminating gas use in operations.
- Removing SF6-based equipment from distribution systems.
- Expanding renewable electricity use across facilities.
- Improving energy efficiency in production and manufacturing.
Sungrow is committed to staying on track. It has joined initiatives like RE100, which focuses on 100% renewable electricity, and EP100, which aims for better energy productivity.
It has set measurable performance targets, including energy consumption per production unit. Annual monitoring ensures transparency and accountability.

Vilvoorde Battery Park: A Blueprint for Europe
The Vilvoorde battery park is a model for Europe’s energy transition. It shows how large-scale storage can stabilize grids, support renewables, and cut fossil fuel use.
By combining ENGIE’s expertise in energy management with Sungrow’s technology, Belgium is positioning itself at the forefront of Europe’s clean energy transformation.
As the continent works toward its 2050 net-zero goals, projects like Vilvoorde show us the future of energy. They rely on flexibility, innovation, and strong partnerships. This battery project marks a key step in Europe’s clean energy journey.
It proves that large-scale storage can power homes and balance renewable supply. With ENGIE’s investment and Sungrow’s technology, Belgium leads the way to a greener, stronger power grid. As phase two nears, the project shows that energy storage is crucial for Europe’s net-zero goals.
The post Sungrow Powers ENGIE’s €290M Vilvoorde Battery Park, Europe’s Largest of Its Kind appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
The real cost of 1 tonne of CO2: Translating carbon into hectares
Every business carbon footprint report ends with a number, the amount of carbon emissions produced by the business, less the amount of carbon reduced and offset, given in tonnes of CO₂. Many of the people who sign off on that number, including those who paid for it, cannot picture what it represents on the ground. A tonne is a unit of mass. CO₂ is invisible. The link between the amount offset in the report and a real piece of restored forest somewhere in the world is almost never indicated.
![]()
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

