Last Thursday, March 20, Senators Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and Bill Hagerty (R-TN) published an op-ed in Power Magazine arguing that the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) should:
- Immediately file an SMR construction application with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
- Seek funding from the Department of Energy Generation III+ Small Modular Reactor Program.
- Stop analysis paralysis from getting in the way of producing a first-in-class SMR.
- Articulate a plan, and the resources necessary, for the nation’s largest public utility to command a lead in the provision of energy for the country’s technological innovations that will ensure American leadership throughout this century and beyond.
In doing so, the Senators have recklessly engaged in attempted micromanagement of TVA’s leadership and put taxpayers and TVA customers at risk of financial disaster.
Reckless Attempt at Micromanaging TVA
Although we at SACE have a laundry list of criticisms of TVA’s decisionmaking and its current leadership, we do not agree that U.S. Senators, lacking understanding and experience in energy related issues, have the authority nor the knowledge needed to step in and make decisions on the utility’s behalf. Increasing accountability and transparency at TVA remain top priorities for SACE – and we will continue to ask questions and fact check TVA’s assumptions at every crossroads – but micromanagement by elected officials without subject matter expertise is not the answer.

The Senators’ claim that “analysis paralysis” is getting in the way of TVA leading a nuclear renaissance shows complete disregardfor protocols surrounding cost and analytics that TVA is under clear directive to undertake. The Senators seem to be suggesting that TVA should pursue expensive new nuclear construction without evaluating the costs or how long new nuclear resources would take to come online; and that ratepayers should willingly be on the hook to shoulder the billions of dollars without considering the alternatives. Reports continue to show that SMRs are not cost effective, which is a primary reason TVA did not prioritize this technology in its most recent IRP. And while we do have criticisms of the recent IRP, we believe TVA’s particular decision to avoid endangering ratepayers is sound.
We’ve Seen This Before – It Wasn’t Pretty Then. And It Would Be Even Uglier Today if We Allow History to Repeat Itself

This isn’t the first time nuclear power has been touted as the future of the Tennessee Valley. In the 1970s TVA went on a binge of nuclear: proposing 17 new nuclear plants, across Alabama, Tennessee, and Mississippi. Of these 17, only 7 were completed: 3 units at Browns Ferry (Alabama), 2 at Sequoyah (Tennessee), and 2 at Watts Bar (Tennessee), although Watts Bar 2 wasn’t completed until 2016. The other 10 were never completed, but contributed to a whopping $20 billion + debt that TVA customers are still paying down. In fact TVA’s nuclear power program in the 1960s and 1970s became one of the most dramatic — and troubled — nuclear expansions in U.S. history. The financial burden of this shortsighted plan is still impacting families and businesses in the region. Do we have amnesia?
The planned TVA reactors were spread across several sites:
- Browns Ferry (Alabama) – 3 units
- Sequoyah (Tennessee) – 2 units
- Watts Bar (Tennessee) – 2 units
- Bellefonte (Alabama) – 2 units (never completed)
- Phipps Bend (Tennessee) – 2 units (never completed)
- Hartsville (Tennessee) – 4 units (never completed)
- Yellow Creek (Mississippi) – 2 units (never completed)
The Senators last week made an analogy in their op-ed comparing their proposed nuclear expansion to NASA’s going to the moon: “TVA could be to the nuclear race what NASA was to the space race.” The multi-billion dollar pricetag that applies to both projects in this comparison is analogous, but where the NASA mission was taxpayer funded, TVA’s budget is shouldered ultimately by the electric customers throughout the Tennessee Valley in seven states. The ultimate question with unproven technology is who carries the risk of delays, cost overruns, and failure to complete. TVA bill payers have already learned this hard lesson, but Senators Blackburn and Hagerty would have us repeat the mistakes of the past.

The sad irony of this reckless proposal is that of the seven nuclear units TVA currently currently has operational, three units (42% of TVA’s nuclear capacity) are offline as we post this and have been unreliable through this winter’s demand, causing significant increases in costly imported power and outages leading to major interruptions like closing schools to save power (as explained in this voicemail from Hamilton County Schools). If TVA is facing power shortfalls today and its existing nuclear fleet is unreliable, it is absolute folly to propose increasing its reliance on nuclear by focusing on resources that will take 10, 15, or even 20 years to come online.
Former TN Senator Bill Frist restructured the TVA Board in the Energy Policy Act of 2005, changing it from a three member full-time board to a nine member part-time Board with a CEO. He did this in an attempt to make TVA decisionmaking less politically driven. In their state of amnesia, the current Senators are appearing to completely discount this history. Their proposal to make TVA leadership hyperpartisan in the pursuit of a one-dimensional commitment to unproven SMR technology is misguided and potentially very dangerous.
TVA Needs Reforms, Not Recklessness
Does TVA need reform and potential serious restructuring? Yes. Is the reckless op-ed by Tennessee’s current ill-informed Senators a serious proposal? Not even close. SACE has challenged TVA’s leadership to lead on 21st century technology that is cost effective and financially responsible and solves both near-term and long-term energy challenges. We have also supported serious proposals to explore expanding TVA generation and transmission. So far TVA’s current leadership and Board have fallen short.
We welcome serious debate and thoughtful proposals, but this op-ed represents the opposite of what is needed at this moment.
The post Suffering from Delusions of Nuclear Grandeur and Amnesia, TN Senators Recklessly Step into TVA Leadership appeared first on SACE | Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.
Renewable Energy
Conservative Political Action Committee (CPAC) Endorses Mike Lindell
Here’s another reminder of how far to the extreme low brow right the American conservative movement has swung.
The only political experience Mike Lindell has comes from his having eagerly accepted Trump’s lie that the 2020 election was rigged with massive voter fraud, for which there is exactly zero evidence.
As a consequence, Lindell is facing multiple lawsuits, including a June 2025 verdict ordering him to pay $2.3 million to a former Dominion Voting Systems employee for defamation. He also faces lawsuits from Smartmatic for defamation and a suit over a $3 million unpaid loan.
That’s it, folks. No experiencing running a small town in Alabama, let alone a state full of well-educated progressives in which Trump lost to Kamala Harris by a full 4% in 2024.
Conservative Political Action Committee (CPAC) Endorses Mike Lindell
Renewable Energy
Dave Rozsak Running for Office in Dallas County, TX
My advice to David:
I doubt this misleading crap is going to work in Dallas County, where voters are relatively well educated and sophisticated.
You’ll need to some place full of real bumpkins, which, in Texas, shouldn’t be too great a challenge.
Renewable Energy
Losing My Religion
Some may find the claim at left compelling.
But consider Japan, China, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and Finland that are almost completely atheist. The other nations in Western Europe have also steadily moved away from religion.
Have they “lost their countries,” or is this a present-day scare tactic directed by fear-mongers, just as it has been since the Dark Ages?
-
Climate Change8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Renewable Energy6 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
