China’s electric vehicle (EV) maker Leapmotor has signed a carbon credit transfer agreement with Italy’s Stellantis. The plan sees Stellantis buying CO₂ credits from Leapmotor, which can generate these credits through producing and selling zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs).
The deal reflects how EV manufacturers are not only cutting emissions but also earning revenue by selling tradable carbon credits. Let’s uncover how.
Trading Carbon and Cars: Inside the Leapmotor-Stellantis Deal
In a strategic move, Leapmotor announced that its subsidiary Leapmotor Power has signed a carbon credit transfer agreement with Stellantis units in China. The deal allows Stellantis’ Chinese units to purchase carbon credits from Leapmotor, helping the global auto giant comply with China’s strict vehicle emission regulations.
Leapmotor’s subsidiary will transfer CO₂ credits to several Stellantis brands, such as Fiat and Jeep, under a plan that likely spans several years. Each credit represents one tonne of CO₂ avoided by selling an EV instead of a fossil-fuel vehicle.
The Italian carmaker aims to be net zero by 2038, and part of this goal is rolling out battery electric vehicles (BEVs) by 2030. Apart from buying carbon credits, Stellantis is also ramping up its EV strategy, investing in battery production and infrastructure. The company aims for 100% battery electric vehicle (BEV) sales in Europe and 50% in the U.S. by 2030.

While specific volumes and pricing weren’t disclosed, Stellantis and Leapmotor called the deal “landmark.” It signals a growing trend: EV makers increasingly rely on carbon credit sales to boost revenue and offset costs.
The transaction highlights the growing importance of carbon credits in global automotive strategy. By selling credits from its zero-emission EVs, Leapmotor not only gains new revenue but also strengthens its relationship with Stellantis, which owns a 20% stake in the Chinese EV maker.
Moreover, the agreement reflects Stellantis’ push to meet regulatory requirements while scaling up its electrification strategy in a cost-effective way. Leapmotor further said the agreement complies with China’s “Parallel Management Method for Passenger Vehicle Corporate Average Fuel Consumption (CAFC) and New Energy Vehicle (NEV) Credits.”
This policy encourages automakers to improve fuel efficiency and expand NEV output to earn tradable credits, aligning with China’s national goals to peak carbon emissions before 2030.
Turning Emissions Into Earnings: How EVs Mint Carbon Credits
Electric vehicles play a crucial role in the global shift to cleaner transportation, not just by reducing tailpipe emissions, but also by generating carbon credits. Because EVs produce zero direct emissions, each vehicle sold contributes to a manufacturer’s carbon offset capabilities.
These offsets can be converted into carbon credits, which are then traded or sold to other companies that need to balance out their carbon footprint. This system provides a major incentive for automakers to go green.
Zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) automatically earn credits under many emissions rules. Regulators like California, China, and the EU set ZEV quotas, mandating that a share of each automaker’s sales must come from EVs. If carmakers fall short, they must buy credits from those, like Leapmotor, that sell EVs.
Tesla is the most notable case. In 2024, it earned $2.76 billion in carbon-credit revenue, up 54% from 2023 ($1.79B). That credit sales helped Tesla generate nearly 30% of its quarterly profits in late 2024.

Since 2017, Tesla has made over $10.4B from regulatory credit sales. Its dominance shows how EV-led carbon programs can turn into powerful income streams.
This income supports Tesla’s bottom line and helps fund further investment in clean technology. As more countries introduce stricter emissions regulations and carbon pricing systems, EV makers like Leapmotor and Tesla are well-positioned to benefit.
Leapmotor Cashes In: Joining the Billion-Dollar EV Credit Market
Leapmotor’s deal with Stellantis means it can tap into this same market. As more countries tighten emissions rules, demand for credits is rising. For Stellantis, buying Leapmotor’s ZEV credits helps the company meet regulatory targets, especially in Europe, where non-compliance can trigger fines of €95 per gram of CO₂ per kilometer.
For Leapmotor, this provides steady revenue and strengthens its financial profile. The company can now scale production more confidently and reinvest in EV technology, production capacity, or market expansion.
Bumps in the Fast Lane
EV credit markets can shift quickly. In the U.S., lawmakers are considering phasing out credit programs, which would threaten Tesla’s model. In the EU, pooling credits between automakers is allowed, but regulators may change these rules.
- SEE MORE: EU’s 2025 Emission Rules Led Tesla and Mercedes to Pool Carbon Credits to Avoid $15.6 Billion Fine
Analysts also warn that as every carmaker ramps up EV production, credit prices may drop. Tesla’s revenues rose when others lagged, but as more EVs flood the market, credit demand could weaken and prices fall.
What It Means for the EV Market and Carbon Goals
The Leapmotor-Stellantis carbon credit deal shows how traditional and electric carmakers can work together to meet climate targets. It also reveals a growing trend in the EV space, where clean car companies gain an additional stream of revenue by selling credits to those that lag behind in electrification.
For Leapmotor, the deal boosts credibility and financial flexibility as it expands in and outside China. For Stellantis, the agreement helps it stay compliant in the world’s largest auto market while giving it time to accelerate its own EV rollout.
This model mirrors what Tesla has long benefited from and could soon become a standard revenue model for many EV players. With global carbon credit markets expected to reach hundreds of billions of dollars by 2030, carbon trading between automakers could significantly impact the industry’s economics and the pace of decarbonization.
Bloomberg forecasts global EV sales to take 50% of the market by 2030. China remains the top market globally. 
As global policies tighten and consumer demand for EVs grows, automakers will likely explore more creative ways, like this partnership, to manage their carbon footprints. These deals reinforce how EVs are more than just clean transport—they’re a powerful lever in the global carbon economy.
Looking Ahead: Leapmotor’s Path to Profit and Sustainability
Leapmotor’s deal with Stellantis positions it not only as an EV innovator but also as an energy-efficient exporter of carbon compliance. As global emissions rules tighten, its ability to generate carbon assets may become a key revenue source.
The deal also highlights how the shift to electric vehicles is reshaping global emissions markets. Automakers that sell EVs can now earn substantial revenue through regulatory credits, while legacy firms comply with climate rules.
Tesla’s multi-billion-dollar credit earnings show just how lucrative this business can be. As EV sales grow, the competition for credits will intensify. For EV producers, carbon credits offer not just sustainability merit but real financial value, bolstering their position in the global automotive market and speeding the transition to net-zero transport.
The post Stellantis and Leapmotor Forge Carbon Credit Deal Amid Booming EV Market appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Bitcoin Falls as Energy Prices Rise: Why Crypto Is Now an Energy Market Story
Bitcoin’s recent drop below $70,000 reflects more than short-term market pressure. It signals a deeper shift. The world’s largest cryptocurrency is becoming increasingly tied to global energy markets.
For years, Bitcoin has moved mainly on investor sentiment, adoption trends, and regulation. Today, another force is shaping its direction: the cost of energy.
As oil prices rise and electricity markets tighten, Bitcoin is starting to behave less like a tech asset and more like an energy-dependent system. This shift is changing how investors, analysts, and policymakers understand crypto.
A Global Power Consumer: Inside Bitcoin’s Energy Use
Bitcoin depends on mining, a process that uses powerful computers to verify transactions. These machines run continuously and consume large amounts of electricity.
Data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration shows Bitcoin mining used between 67 and 240 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity in 2023, with a midpoint estimate of about 120 TWh.

Other estimates place consumption closer to 170 TWh per year in 2025. This accounts for roughly 0.5% of global electricity demand. Recently, as of February 2026, estimates see Bitcoin’s energy use reaching over 200 TWh per year.
That level of energy use is significant. Global electricity demand reached about 27,400 TWh in 2023. Bitcoin’s share may seem small, but it is comparable to the power use of mid-sized countries.
The network also requires steady power. Estimates suggest it draws around 10 gigawatts continuously, similar to several large power plants operating at full capacity. This constant demand makes energy costs central to Bitcoin’s economics.
When Oil Rises, Bitcoin Falls
Bitcoin mining is highly sensitive to electricity prices. Energy is the highest operating cost for miners. When power becomes more expensive, profit margins shrink.
Recent market movements show this link clearly. As oil prices rise and inflation concerns persist, energy costs have increased. At the same time, Bitcoin prices have weakened, falling below the $70,000 level.

This is not a coincidence. Studies show a direct relationship between Bitcoin prices, mining activity, and electricity use. When Bitcoin prices rise, more miners join the network, increasing energy demand. When energy costs rise, less efficient miners may shut down, reducing activity and adding selling pressure.
This creates a feedback loop between crypto and energy markets. Bitcoin is no longer driven only by demand and speculation. It is now influenced by the same forces that affect oil, gas, and power prices.
Cleaner Energy Use Is Growing, but Fossil Fuels Still Matter
Bitcoin’s environmental impact depends on its energy mix. This mix is improving, but it remains uneven.
A 2025 study from the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance found that 52.4% of Bitcoin mining now uses sustainable energy. This includes both renewable sources (42.6%) and nuclear power (9.8%). The share has risen significantly from about 37.6% in 2022.
Despite this progress, fossil fuels still account for a large portion of mining energy. Natural gas alone makes up about 38.2%, while coal continues to contribute a smaller share.

This reliance on fossil fuels keeps emissions high. Current estimates suggest Bitcoin produces more than 114 million tons of carbon dioxide each year. That puts it in line with emissions from some industrial sectors.
The shift toward cleaner energy is real, but it is not complete. The pace of change will play a key role in how Bitcoin fits into global climate goals.
Bitcoin’s Climate Debate Intensifies
Bitcoin’s growing energy demand has placed it at the center of ESG discussions. Its impact is often measured through three key areas:
- Total electricity use, which rivals that of entire countries.
- Carbon emissions are estimated at over 100 million tons of CO₂ annually.
- Energy intensity, with a single transaction using large amounts of power.

At the same time, the industry is evolving. Mining companies are adopting more efficient hardware and exploring new energy sources. Some operations use excess renewable power or capture waste energy, such as flare gas from oil fields.
These efforts show progress, but they do not fully address the concerns. The gap between Bitcoin’s energy use and its environmental impact remains a key issue for investors and regulators.
- MUST READ: Bitcoin Price Hits All-Time High Above $126K: ETFs, Market Drivers, and the Future of Digital Gold
Bitcoin Is Becoming Part of the Energy System
Bitcoin mining is now closely integrated with the broader energy system. Operators often choose locations based on access to cheap or excess electricity. This includes areas with strong renewable generation or underused energy resources.
This integration creates both opportunities and challenges. On one hand, mining can support energy systems by using power that might otherwise go to waste. It can also provide flexible demand that helps stabilize grids.
On the other hand, it can increase pressure on local electricity supplies and extend the use of fossil fuels if cleaner options are not available.
In the United States, Bitcoin mining could account for up to 2.3% of total electricity demand in certain scenarios. This highlights how quickly the sector is scaling and how closely it is tied to national energy systems.
Energy Markets Are Now Key to Bitcoin’s Future
Looking ahead, the connection between Bitcoin and energy is expected to grow stronger. The network’s computing power, or hash rate, continues to reach new highs, which typically leads to higher energy use.
Electricity will remain the main cost for miners. This means Bitcoin will continue to respond to changes in energy prices and supply conditions. At the same time, governments are starting to pay closer attention to crypto’s environmental impact, which could shape future regulations.

Some forecasts suggest Bitcoin’s energy use could rise sharply if adoption increases, potentially reaching up to 400 TWh in extreme scenarios. However, cleaner energy systems could reduce the carbon impact over time.
Bitcoin is no longer just a financial asset. It is also a large-scale energy consumer and a growing part of the global power system.
As a result, understanding Bitcoin now requires a broader view. Energy prices, electricity markets, and carbon trends are becoming just as important as market demand and investor sentiment.
The message is clear. As energy markets move, Bitcoin is likely to move with them.
The post Bitcoin Falls as Energy Prices Rise: Why Crypto Is Now an Energy Market Story appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
LEGO’s Virginia Factory Goes Big on Solar as Net-Zero Push Speeds Up
The post LEGO’s Virginia Factory Goes Big on Solar as Net-Zero Push Speeds Up appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Chanel Reveals First Climate Transition Plan: How the Luxury Giant Aims to Hit Net-Zero
Chanel has unveiled its first comprehensive climate transition plan, charting a clear path to net-zero emissions by 2040. Building on its earlier “Mission 1.5°” strategy, the plan aligns with global climate standards and follows the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi). This means Chanel must reduce at least 90% of its emissions and remove the remainder.
The move shows a bigger change in luxury brands. They face more pressure from investors, regulators, and customers to take real climate action. Many companies now publish detailed transition plans to show how they intend to meet their net-zero commitments.
For Chanel, climate considerations are no longer immaterial—they now inform core business decisions, from risk management to opportunity assessment.
Breaking Down Chanel’s 1M Tonnes Carbon Footprint
In its Climate Transition Plan, Chanel reported total emissions of about 1.12 million tonnes of CO₂e in 2024. Most of these emissions do not come from its own stores or offices. Instead, they come from its supply chain.
- Scope 1 and 2 emissions: 2% of total (about 24,071 tonnes)
- Scope 3 emissions: 98% of total (about 1.1 million tonnes)

This shows a key challenge. Like many fashion brands, Chanel’s biggest impact is upstream. That includes raw materials, manufacturing, and logistics. The largest source is purchased goods and services, which account for over 626,000 tonnes of CO₂e.
Other major sources include:
- Capital goods: about 222,000 tonnes
- Transport and distribution: over 114,000 tonnes
- Business travel: over 53,000 tonnes
These figures highlight how complex the fashion supply chain is. It also shows why cutting emissions is harder than in other sectors.
Clear Targets: 2030 and 2040 Milestones

Chanel has set both near-term and long-term net-zero targets to tackle its carbon footprint. By 2030, the company aims to:
- Cut Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 50%, and cut Scope 3 emissions by 42%.
By 2040, the goal is deeper:
- Cut all emissions (Scope 1, 2, and 3) by 90%, and remove the remaining emissions through carbon removals.
Specific targets also cover land-based emissions associated with raw materials like leather and cashmere, with reductions of 30.3% by 2030 and 72% by 2040.
Importantly, Chanel does not rely on carbon offset credits to meet its targets. Instead, it focuses on real emissions cuts. This aligns with stricter global standards. Many frameworks now limit the use of offsets in net-zero plans.
Progress So Far: Renewable Energy and Supply Chain Improvements
The French luxury brand has already achieved measurable progress. Direct emissions have fallen 22% since 2021, driven primarily by the use of renewable energy. By 2024, 99% of the company’s electricity came from renewable sources, and the goal is to reach 100% by 2025.

Long-term power purchase agreements, including solar projects across Asia and Europe, have supported this transition.
Scope 3 emissions have also improved, declining 10% relative to 2021. Raw material emissions dropped 20% in 2024, thanks to changes in sourcing and the adoption of lower-impact inputs such as sustainable leather and cashmere.
How Chanel Plans to Cut Emissions and Reach Net Zero
The company’s strategy to tackle its emissions focuses on six main areas:
- optimizing operations,
- adopting lower-impact materials and packaging,
- implementing sustainable design in construction and events,
- shifting to low-emission logistics,
- promoting electric mobility, and
- engaging closely with suppliers.
Since Scope 3 emissions dominate the total footprint, supplier engagement is crucial.

Innovation also plays a key role. Chanel supports initiatives that reduce energy consumption in manufacturing, such as a project that lowered energy use by 27% at a supplier site. Circular design is another focus, with investments in repair services and durable products to extend product life.
Beyond Emissions: Climate Investment and Social Impact
Chanel’s climate plan extends beyond emissions reductions. The company invests in nature and climate projects, including the LEAF Coalition for forest protection, sustainable agriculture programs, and community-based climate initiatives.
In 2024, Chanel committed $125 million to Fondation Chanel, part of which funds women-led climate programs, tying environmental action to social impact. This approach embodies a “just transition,” ensuring that climate action also benefits workers and communities.
The Luxury Sector Shifts: Chanel Sets the Bar for Fashion
Chanel’s plan reflects a wider shift in the fashion and luxury sector. The industry faces growing pressure to act on climate. Fashion accounts for an estimated 2% to 8% of global emissions, based on various global studies.

Supply chains are complex and global, making change harder. At the same time, regulations are tightening. New rules in Europe and other regions require companies to disclose emissions and transition plans.
Many brands are now setting net-zero targets. But not all have detailed plans. Chanel’s transition plan stands out because it includes:
- Full emissions data
- Clear reduction targets
- A roadmap for action
Still, challenges remain. Cutting Scope 3 emissions is difficult. It depends on suppliers, technology, and costs. There is also a risk of slow progress. New materials, clean energy, and circular systems take time to scale.
Looking Ahead: A Long Road to Net-Zero
Chanel’s transition plan represents a significant step in addressing over 1 million tonnes of emissions. Progress in operations and energy use is evident, but the supply chain remains the most difficult hurdle.
Achieving net-zero by 2040 will require transforming material sourcing, deep collaboration with suppliers, and investment in new technologies.
As consumer demand for low-carbon products grows and investors increasingly scrutinize climate risks, transition plans have become a business imperative. Chanel’s strategy highlights a key trend: climate action is no longer a peripheral responsibility—it is integral to growth, risk management, and long-term value creation.
The post Chanel Reveals First Climate Transition Plan: How the Luxury Giant Aims to Hit Net-Zero appeared first on Carbon Credits.
-
Greenhouse Gases7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Renewable Energy2 years ago
GAF Energy Completes Construction of Second Manufacturing Facility






