Connect with us

Published

on

The first three quarters of 2023 has seen exceptional heat globally, putting 2023 on track to be the warmest year since records began in the mid-1800s, and likely for millennia before as well.

The past four months, in particular, have far exceeded any prior records, with September smashing the prior record by around 0.5C.

In this latest “state of the climate” quarterly update, Carbon Brief finds:

  • June, July, August, September and (very likely) October were the warmest respective months since records began.
  • 2023 is now virtually certain to be the hottest year on record globally.
  • A strong El Niño is expected to persist until mid-2024 in the majority of El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) forecast models.
  • October is likely to be extremely warm based on daily data so far, though not quite as unusual as September.
  • While the exceptional warmth of the last few months is primarily driven by a strong El Niño on top of human-driven warming, other contributing factors include an uptick in the 11-year solar cycle, an unusual volcanic eruption last year and a 2020 phaseout of planet-cooling sulphur dioxide in marine shipping fuels.
  • Ocean heat content set a new record in September and has increased substantially over the past 12 months.
  • Antarctic sea ice has been exceptionally far below the prior record low for the past six months, while Arctic sea ice remains at the low end of the historical range.
  • Global temperatures are closely aligned with the projections from climate models.

Global temperatures have soared in recent months

After a cool start due to an unusually persistent “triple dip” La Niña event, global temperatures have soared in recent months driven by rapidly growing El Niño conditions.

This short-term natural variability builds on top of the roughly 1.3C warming that has occurred since the mid-1800s due to human emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases.

The figure below shows how global temperature so far in 2023 (black line) compares to each month in different years over the prior decade (coloured lines) in the Berkeley Earth surface temperature dataset.

Temperatures for each month from 2015 to 2023 from Berkeley Earth. Anomalies plotted with respect to a 1850-99 baseline. Chart by Carbon Brief.

Temperatures for each month from 2015 to 2023 from Berkeley Earth. Anomalies plotted with respect to a 1850-99 baseline. Chart by Carbon Brief.

Every month from June onward this year has set a clear record, with July, August and September shattering prior records by at least 0.3C (and around 0.5C in the case of September). The exceptional summer warmth means that it is now virtually certain that 2023 will be the warmest year on record.

In this latest quarterly state of the climate assessment, Carbon Brief analysed records from five different research groups that report global surface temperature records: NASA’s GISTEMP; NOAA’s GlobalTemp; Hadley/UEA’s HadCRUT5; Berkeley Earth; and Copernicus/ECMWF.

The figure below shows the annual temperatures from each of these groups since 1970, along with the average over the first nine months of 2023. (Note: at the time of writing, September data was not yet available for the Hadley/UEA record.)

Annual global mean surface temperatures from NASA GISTEMP, NOAA GlobalTemp, Hadley/UEA HadCRUT5, Berkeley Earth and Copernicus/ECMWF (lines), along with 2023 temperatures to date (January-September, coloured shapes). Each series is aligned by using a 1981-2010 baseline, with warming since pre-industrial based on HadCRUT5 values from the 1850-1899 to 1981-2010 periods. Chart by Carbon Brief.

Annual global mean surface temperatures from NASA GISTEMP, NOAA GlobalTemp, Hadley/UEA HadCRUT5, Berkeley Earth and Copernicus/ECMWF (lines), along with 2023 temperatures to date (January-September, coloured shapes). Each series is aligned by using a 1981-2010 baseline, with warming since pre-industrial based on HadCRUT5 values from the 1850-1899 to 1981-2010 periods. Chart by Carbon Brief.

The globe as a whole has warmed around 1C since 1970, with strong agreement between different global temperature records. All show that year-to-date 2023 records are higher than any prior annual record. However, there are larger differences between temperature records further back in time (particularly pre-1900) due to sparser observations and a resulting greater sensitivity to how gaps between measurements are filled in.

This year started out a bit on the colder side in all the different temperature records, with January only the seventh warmest January on record and February only the fourth or fifth warmest. March was the second warmest on record, April the fourth or fifth, and May the third warmest across all datasets.

However, from June onward each month has been unambiguously the warmest on record across all the different datasets. The respective rankings of each month in each dataset are shown below.

GISTEMP HadCRUT5 NOAA Berkeley Copernicus
Jan 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th
Feb 4th 4th 4th 5th 5th
Mar 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd
April 4th 4th 5th 4th 5th
May 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd
June 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st
July 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st
Aug 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st
Sept 1st TBC 1st 1st 1st

Rankings of 2023 global temperature by month across different datasets.

The continued strengthening of El Niño over the next few months means that it is likely that this streak of record-setting warmth will continue.

The figure below shows a range of different ENSO forecast models produced by different scientific groups. The values shown are sea surface temperature variations in the tropical Pacific – the El Niño 3.4 region – for three-month periods.

El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) forecast models for overlapping three-month periods in the Niño3.4 region (August, September, October – ASO – and so on) for the remainder of 2023 and then into the summer of 2024.
El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) forecast models for overlapping three-month periods in the Niño3.4 region (August, September, October – ASO – and so on) for the remainder of 2023 and then into the summer of 2024. Credit: Images provided by the International Research Institute for Climate and Society, Columbia University Climate School.

Virtually all models expect El Niño conditions to remain until early-to-mid 2024. Most models project a strong El Niño (>1.5C Niño 3.4 sea surface temperature – SST – anomaly), but relatively few expect a “super El Niño” (>2.5C) as strong as the world saw in 2015-16 or 1997-98.

Extreme heat worldwide

Record-setting global temperatures contributed to record heatwaves in many regions over the recent northern-hemisphere summer. The figure below shows the parts of the world that saw record warm or cold temperatures over the first two-thirds of 2023 (January through to September) in the Berkeley Earth dataset.

Large parts of the North Atlantic saw record warm temperatures, as did the UK, large parts of Europe, the southern US and Mexico, Central America, South America, the Caribbean, Korea, Japan and China.

Notably, no area on Earth saw record cold (or even the second-to-fifth coldest temperatures on record).

Map of year-to-date (January-September) regions that set new records (warmest through to fifth warmest).
Map of year-to-date (January-September) regions that set new records (warmest through to fifth warmest). Note that no regions set cold records for the year-to-date in 2023. Credit: Berkeley Earth

In September alone, 77 different countries – mostly in Europe and the tropics – set new monthly average records.

Virtually everywhere on the planet saw warmer-than-usual temperatures for the year so far, with the exception of the western US, India and Greenland.

The tropical Pacific shows a strong characteristic “warm tongue” associated with El Niño over the first nine months of the year. The global temperature anomalies (changes) relative to the 1951-80 period used by Berkeley Earth are shown in the map below.

Map of year-to-date (January-September) global surface temperatures.
Map of year-to-date (January-September) global surface temperatures. Anomalies are shown relative to the 1951-1980 period following the convention used by Berkeley Earth. Credit: Berkeley Earth.

October continuing the record warm streak

While global temperature records are not yet in for the full month of October 2023, real-time reanalysis products increasingly allow scientists to track global temperatures on a daily basis.

Reanalysis pulls together a huge amount of data from satellites, weather balloons, aeroplanes, weather stations, ships and buoys to provide a detailed look at how the Earth’s climate is changing in real-time.

Modern reanalysis products, such as JRA-55 and ERA5, use state-of-the-art methods to produce records that align well with traditional surface temperature datasets over recent decades.

In the figure below, Carbon Brief shows the daily global temperature anomaly values from the JRA-55 reanalysis product for each day since the record began in 1958 (grey lines). It shows the current year to date (2023) in red and the prior record warm year, 2016, in blue. Nearly every single day since mid-June 2023 has been warmer than any prior days since the JRA-55 record began in 1958 – and, potentially, much further into the past.

Daily global mean surface temperature anomalies from the JRA-55 reanalysis product, using its standard 1991-2020 baseline period.
Daily global mean surface temperature anomalies from the JRA-55 reanalysis product, using its standard 1991-2020 baseline period. Lines show global surface temperature anomalies for each day since the record began in 1958 (grey), the current year of 2023 to date (red) and the previous record warm year in 2016 (blue). Chart by Carbon Brief.

The heat map below focuses on 2023, showing each day in the year, with columns representing each month. The red shading shows the temperature anomaly of each day, with darker shading indicating more extreme temperatures. The map highlights how extreme the prior four months (from July onward) have been compared to the prior period.

Daily global average surface temperature anomalies for 2023 from the JRA-55 reanalysis product, using its standard 1991-2020 baseline period.
Daily global average surface temperature anomalies for 2023 from the JRA-55 reanalysis product, using its standard 1991-2020 baseline period. Chart by Carbon Brief.

With most of the data for the month of October now available in the JRA-55 reanalysis product, Carbon Brief estimates that October 2023 will be the warmest October on record, and is likely to exceed the prior record by at least 0.3C.

The figure below shows Carbon Brief’s estimate for October, with uncertainty intervals estimates based on the historical relationship between the first 19 days of the month available at the time of publication and the overall monthly average.

Monthly global mean surface temperature anomalies from the JRA-55 reanalysis product, using its standard 1991-2020 baseline period.
Monthly global mean surface temperature anomalies from the JRA-55 reanalysis product, using its standard 1991-2020 baseline period. Lines show global surface temperature anomalies for each year since the record began in 1958, with years coloured by decade. The current year (2023) is shown in black. Chart by Carbon Brief.

October is projected to not be quite as extreme as September’s record-shattering anomaly, but will still come in as the second highest anomaly of any month in 2023 to-date.

In addition to temperature anomalies, reanalysis products are able to provide an accurate near-real-time estimate of global absolute temperatures. The figure below shows the absolute temperature of each month of 2023 compared to all prior years in the record, with Carbon Brief’s October estimate and its uncertainties shown.

Monthly absolute global average surface temperatures from the JRA-55 reanalysis product.
Monthly absolute global average surface temperatures from the JRA-55 reanalysis product. Lines show global surface temperatures for each year since the record began in 1958, with years coloured by decade. The current year (2023) is shown in black. Chart by Carbon Brief.

Unpacking the drivers of recent record warmth

The extreme surface temperatures seen over the past few months have triggered a broader debate in the scientific community around its potential drivers.

For example, the world has never seen a month exceed the prior monthly record by 0.5C – as experienced in September. The closest analogue is February 2016, where global temperatures beat the prior record by 0.47C.

However, February 2016 was shortly after the peak of a super El Niño event – when the effect of El Niño on global temperatures is expected to be the largest. September 2023, by contrast, occurred early in the evolution of the current El Niño event when the contribution to global temperatures is typically much smaller.

This has led to a search for alternative explanations of factors contributing to recent record warmth. While the rapid switch from modest La Niña conditions at the start of the year to growing El Niño conditions on top of human-driven warming remains the primary explanation, it cannot easily explain the full extent of extreme global temperatures over the past few months.
A number of different potential contributors to recent global temperature records have been identified, including an uptick in the 11-year solar cycle, an unusual volcanic eruption last year that put a large amount of water vapour into the stratosphere with minimal cooling sulphate aerosols, and a 2020 phaseout of planet-cooling sulphur dioxide in marine shipping fuels.

The figure below, developed by Dr Robert Rohde at Berkeley Earth, shows a current best-estimate of the impact of each of these effects over the past 10 years based on published studies to-date. The shading indicates a warming (red) or cooling (blue) influence on global temperatures.

While each of these factors are small on their own, their combined effects may be to add around 0.1C to global temperatures in 2023.

Estimated drivers of global surface temperature evolution over the past decade.
Estimated drivers of global surface temperature evolution over the past decade. Note that marine fuel pollution reduction should technically be part of human-caused global warming (which includes both greenhouse gas and aerosol emissions), but is separated out for clarity. Credit: Berkeley Earth

Temperatures are tracking climate model projections

Climate models provide physics-based estimates of future warming given different assumptions about future emissions, greenhouse gas concentrations and other climate-influencing factors.

The figure below shows the range of individual models forecasts featured in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) fifth assessment report – known collectively as the CMIP5 models – between 1970 and 2030, with grey shading and the average projection across all the models shown in black. Individual observational temperature records are represented by coloured lines.

In these models, estimates of temperatures prior to 2005 are a “hindcast” using known past climate influences, while temperatures projected after 2005 are a “forecast” based on an estimate of how things might change.

Twelve-month average global average surface temperatures from CMIP5 models and observations between 1970 and 2023. Models use RCP4.5 forcings after 2005. They include sea surface temperatures over oceans and surface air temperatures over land to match what is measured by observations. Anomalies plotted with respect to a 1981-2010 baseline. Chart by Carbon Brief.

Twelve-month average global average surface temperatures from CMIP5 models and observations between 1970 and 2023. Models use RCP4.5 forcings after 2005. They include sea surface temperatures over oceans and surface air temperatures over land to match what is measured by observations. Anomalies plotted with respect to a 1981-2010 baseline. Chart by Carbon Brief.

While global temperatures were running below the pace of warming projected by climate models between 2005 and 2014, the past decade has been closer to the model average.

Currently the latter part of 2022 and early 2023 is suppressing the 12-month average compared to the most recent months, but observations are expected to be well above the model average by mid-2024.

Record high ocean heat content

Human-emitted greenhouse gases trap extra heat in the atmosphere. While some of this warms the Earth’s surface, the vast majority – around 93% – goes into the oceans. About two-thirds of this accumulates in the top 700 metres, but some also ends up in the deep oceans.

The figure below shows annual OHC estimates between 1950 and present for both the upper 700 metres (light blue shading) and 700-2000 metre (dark blue) depths of the ocean.

Monthly global ocean heat content (in zettajoules – billion trillion joules, or 10^21 joules) for the 0-700 metre and 700-2000 metre layers. Data from IAP. Chart by Carbon Brief.

Monthly global ocean heat content (in zettajoules – billion trillion joules, or 10^21 joules) for the 0-700 metre and 700-2000 metre layers. Data from IAP. Chart by Carbon Brief.

In many ways, OHC represents a much better measure of climate change than global average surface temperatures. It is where most of the extra heat ends up and is much less variable on a year-to-year basis than surface temperatures.

Just about every year since 1991 has set a new OHC record, showing that heat has continued to accumulate in the Earth system as concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases have increased.

Over the last 12 months, ocean heat content has increased by 42 zettajoules, or around 72 times as much as the total energy produced by all human activities on Earth last year.

Record low Antarctic sea ice extent

Highly accurate observations of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice have been available since polar-observing satellites became available in the late 1970s.

The figure below shows both Arctic (red) and Antarctic (blue) sea ice extent in 2023, the historical range in the record between 1979 and 2010 (shaded areas) and the record lows (dotted black line).

Arctic and Antarctic daily sea ice extent from the US National Snow and Ice Data Center. The bold lines show daily 2023 values, the shaded area indicates the two standard deviation range in historical values between 1979 and 2010. The dotted black lines show the record lows for each pole. Chart by Carbon Brief.

Arctic and Antarctic daily sea ice extent from the US National Snow and Ice Data Center. The bold lines show daily 2023 values, the shaded area indicates the two standard deviation range in historical values between 1979 and 2010. The dotted black lines show the record lows for each pole. Chart by Carbon Brief.

Arctic sea ice extent during the first three quarters of 2023 has been at the low end of the historical 1979-2010 range, but has not seen any record daily lows except for a few days in February and April.

The annual minimum sea ice extent in September was the sixth lowest on record, though still well above the record low set in 2012.

Weekly Arctic sea ice extent from the US National Snow and Ice Data Center. Chart by Carbon Brief.

Weekly Arctic sea ice extent from the US National Snow and Ice Data Center. Chart by Carbon Brief.

Antarctic sea ice, on the other hand, has set new all-time low records for most of 2023, set a new all-time low extent in February 2023, and has been far below any prior levels ever since mid May.

Weekly Antarctic sea ice extent from the US National Snow and Ice Data Center. Chart by Carbon Brief.

Weekly Antarctic sea ice extent from the US National Snow and Ice Data Center. Chart by Carbon Brief.

The post State of the climate: Global temperatures throughout mid-2023 shatter records appeared first on Carbon Brief.

State of the climate: Global temperatures throughout mid-2023 shatter records

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Corpus Christi Cuts Timeline to Disaster as Abbott Issues Emergency Orders

Published

on

The governor’s office said the city’s two main reservoirs could dry up by May, much sooner than previous timelines. But authorities still offer no plan for curtailment of water use.

City officials in Corpus Christi on Tuesday released modeling that showed emergency cuts to water demand could be required as soon as May as reservoir levels continue to decline.

Corpus Christi Cuts Timeline to Disaster as Abbott Issues Emergency Orders

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Middle East war is another wake-up call for fossil fuel-reliant food systems

Published

on

Lena Luig is the head of the International Agricultural Policy Division at the Heinrich Böll Foundation, a member of the Global Alliance for the Future of Food. Anna Lappé is the Executive Director of the Global Alliance for the Future of Food.

As toxic clouds loom over Tehran and Beirut from the US and Israel’s bombardment of oil depots and civilian infrastructure in the region’s ongoing war, the world is once again witnessing the not-so-subtle connections between conflict, hunger, food insecurity and the vulnerability of global food systems dependent on fossil fuels, dominated by a few powerful countries and corporations.

The conflict in Iran is having a huge impact on the world’s fertilizer supply. The Strait of Hormuz is a critical trade route in the region for nearly half of the global supply of urea, the main synthetic fertilizer derived from natural gas through the conversion of ammonia.

With the Strait impacted by Iran’s blockades, prices of urea have shot up by 35% since the war started, just as planting season starts in many parts of the world, putting millions of farmers and consumers at risk of increasing production costs and food price spikes, resulting in food insecurity, particularly for low-income households. The World Food Programme has projected that an extra 45 million people would be pushed ​into acute hunger because of rises in food, oil and shipping costs, if the war continues until June.

Pesticides and synthetic fertilizer leave system fragile

On the face of it, this looks like a supply chain issue, but at the core of this crisis lies a truth about many of our food systems around the world: the instability and injustice in the very design of systems so reliant on these fossil fuel inputs for our food.

At the Global Alliance, a strategic alliance of philanthropic foundations working to transform food systems, we have been documenting the fossil fuel-food nexus, raising alarm about the fragility of a system propped up by fossil fuels, with 15% of annual fossil fuel use going into food systems, in part because of high-cost, fossil fuel-based inputs like pesticides and synthetic fertilizer. The Heinrich Böll Foundation has also been flagging this threat consistently, most recently in the Pesticide Atlas and Soil Atlas compendia. 

We’ve seen this before: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 sparked global disruptions in fertilizer supply and food price volatility. As the conflict worsened, fertilizer prices spiked – as much from input companies capitalizing on the crisis for speculation as from real cost increases from production and transport – triggering a food price crisis around the world.

    Since then, fertilizer industry profit margins have continued to soar. In 2022, the largest nine fertilizer producers increased their profit margins by more than 35% compared to the year before—when fertilizer prices were already high. As Lena Bassermann and Dr. Gideon Tups underscore in the Heinrich Böll Foundation’s Soil Atlas, the global dependencies of nitrogen fertilizer impacted economies around the world, especially state budgets in already indebted and import-dependent economies, as well as farmers across Africa.

    Learning lessons from the war in Ukraine, many countries invested heavily in renewable energy and/or increased domestic oil production as a way to decrease dependency on foreign fossil fuels. But few took the same approach to reimagining domestic food systems and their food sovereignty.

    Agroecology as an alternative

    There is another way. Governments can adopt policy frameworks to encourage reductions in synthetic fertilizer and pesticide use, especially in regions that currently massively overuse nitrogen fertilizer. At the African Union fertilizer and Soil Health Summit in 2024, African leaders at least agreed that organic fertilizers should be subsidized as well, not only mineral fertilizers, but we can go farther in actively promoting agricultural pathways that reduce fossil fuel dependency. 

    In 2024, the Global Alliance organized dozens of philanthropies to call for a tenfold increase in investments to help farmers transition from fossil fuel dependency towards agroecological approaches that prioritize livelihoods, health, climate, and biodiversity.

    In our research, we detail the huge opportunity to repurpose harmful subsidies currently supporting inputs like synthetic fertilizer and pesticides towards locally-sourced bio-inputs and biofertilizer production. We know this works: There are powerful stories of hope and change from those who have made this transition, despite only receiving a fraction of the financing that industrial agriculture receives, with evidence of benefits from stable incomes and livelihoods to better health and climate outcomes.

    New summit in Colombia seeks to revive stalled UN talks on fossil fuel transition

    Inspiring examples abound: G-BIACK in Kenya is training farmers how to produce their own high-quality compost; start-ups like the Evola Company in Cambodia are producing both nutrient-rich organic fertilizer and protein-rich animal feed with black soldier fly farming; Sabon Sake in Ghana is enriching sugarcane bagasse – usually organic waste – with microbial agents and earthworms to turn it into a rich vermicompost.

    These efforts, grounded in ecosystems and tapping nature for soil fertility and to manage pest pressures, are just some of the countless examples around the world, tapping the skill and knowledge of millions of farmers. On a national and global policy level, the Agroecology Coalition, with 480+ members, including governments, civil society organizations, academic institutions, and philanthropic foundations, is supporting a transition toward agroecology, working with natural systems to produce abundant food, boost biodiversity, and foster community well-being.

    Fertilizer industry spins “clean” products

    We must also inoculate ourselves from the fertilizer industry’s public relations spin, which includes promoting the promise that their products can be produced without heavy reliance on fossil fuels. Despite experts debunking the viability of what the industry has dubbed “green hydrogen” or “green or clean ammonia”, the sector still promotes this narrative, arguing that these are produced with resource-intensive renewable energy or Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), a costly and unreliable technology for reducing emissions.

    As we mourn this conflict’s senseless destruction and death, including hundreds of children, we also recognize that peace cannot mean a return to business-as-usual. We need to upend the systems that allow the richest and most powerful to have dominion over so much.

    This includes fighting for a food system that is based on genuine sovereignty and justice, free from dependency on fossil fuels, one that honors natural systems and puts power into the hands of communities and food producers themselves.

    The post Middle East war is another wake-up call for fossil fuel-reliant food systems appeared first on Climate Home News.

    Middle East war is another wake-up call for fossil fuel-reliant food systems

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    Are There Climate Fingerprints in Tornado Activity?

    Published

    on

    Parts of the Southern and Northeastern U.S. faced tornado threats this week. Scientists are trying to parse out the climate links in changing tornado activity.

    It’s been a weird few weeks for weather across the United States.

    Are There Climate Fingerprints in Tornado Activity?

    Continue Reading

    Trending

    Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com