Starbucks faced a challenging second quarter with declines across major financial metrics, including traffic, revenue, and income, resulting in its stock price plunging. Despite this, the company remains committed to sustainability, aiming to reduce its climate impact by 50% by 2030 through its ambitious “Greener Stores” initiative.
Starbucks Financials Are Boiling Down
Starbucks holds a premium status in the hearts and habits of many, yet its recent quarter revealed a harsh reality: even major consumer companies face tough times. Indeed, Starbucks’ latest results were undeniably dismal.
Starbucks’ challenging second quarter, which concluded on March 31, delivered disappointing results across the board. Key metrics such as traffic, revenue, and income experienced declines:
- 4% decrease in comparable-store sales
- 2% decline in consolidated net revenue
- 2.4% drop in operating margin
- 14% decline in earnings per share
Investors have recently taken a pessimistic view, with Starbucks’ stock dropping about 7% following the report of a quarterly decline in comparable-store sales on April 30. The stock subsequently reached a 52-week low shortly after the company announced its fiscal second-quarter results.

This marked Starbucks’ first revenue downturn since the onset of the pandemic, a stark departure from the company’s long-term target of high-single-digit growth. Yet, as a brand with a 50-year history, Starbucks remains steadfast in its commitment to champion sustainability in the industry.
The coffee chain set an ambitious goal of reducing its climate impact by 50% by 2030. This bold target includes both the direct and indirect carbon footprint of Starbucks. And a big part of this goal is the restaurant’s “Greener Stores” initiative.
The Greener Stores Program
Starbucks designated nearly 16% of its 38,587 cafes as Greener Stores, meeting strict criteria for waste, energy, and water conservation. This marks nearly twofold increase from April 2023, with the aim of certifying 10,000 stores worldwide by the end of 2025. The majority, totaling 5,488 locations, are situated in North America, out of Starbucks’ global network of 38,600 cafes.
Across Latin America and the Caribbean, all new Starbucks stores adhere to Greener Stores standards. Meanwhile, the company’s real estate team is evaluating which markets should follow suit.
To achieve Greener Store status, locations must undergo an independent audit by SCS Global Services, confirming investments and practices across eight environmental impact areas, including:

The Starbucks location in Williamsburg, Virginia, is among the six sites recently recognized as Greener Stores of the Year. Originally a 100-year-old home, this building was repurposed into a cafe featuring:
- Renewable energy sourced from the local grid.
- An on-site rainwater collection system for landscape irrigation.
- Banquettes crafted from recycled wood.
In the United States, the implementation of Greener Stores practices has slashed energy and water use by 30%. This yielded nearly $60 million in annual operational savings. As part of Starbucks’ broader corporate pledge, the company aims to halve emissions, water consumption, and landfill waste by 2030.
Starbucks GHG Emissions Reduction Goal
The coffee chain giant aims to achieve 50% absolute reduction in scope 1, 2 and 3 greenhouse (GHG) emissions involving all of Starbucks direct operations and value chain. The food company uses 2019 GHG emissions as a baseline and reported an 18% increase in emissions in 2023.


To address this environmental impact, the coffee giant has been busy expanding its Greener Stores program. Slashing waste and energy through this initiative means reducing Starbucks carbon footprint, too.
According to Michael Kobori, Starbucks’ chief sustainability officer, the long-term goal is for all new stores to be constructed according to Greener Stores guidelines, with existing locations retrofitted as updates become necessary. The standards used in Greener Stores program were developed in partnership with World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and SCS Global Services.
Taking inspiration from the LEED certification program, Starbucks introduced the Greener Stores framework in September 2018. This initiative builds upon Starbucks’ previous investment in the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification by the U.S. Green Building Council, which acknowledges environmentally conscious construction practices and design.
Notably, Starbucks played a role in establishing the LEED for Retail designation. But unlike the LEED program, the Greener framework places a strong emphasis on operational metrics.
The Growing Trend of Green Standards in the Restaurant Industry
The adoption of standard frameworks like Greener Stores is becoming increasingly common within the restaurant industry. This is particularly among chains facing scrutiny from shareholders regarding their carbon emissions and sustainability efforts, noted Alastair MacGregor, national business line executive and green buildings analyst at consulting firm WSP.
Many establishments prioritize passive architectural design strategies aimed at reducing energy consumption. These strategies include maximizing natural lighting in seating areas and selecting appropriately sized food preparation and ventilation equipment for each location.
Last year, the world’s largest McDonald’s franchisee had also revealed a new standard for sustainability in restaurants to reduce its growing carbon emissions. The food chain partnered with UBQ Materials which employs advanced technology that can avoid GHG emissions of >14 kg/CO2 equivalent.
However, smaller retail organizations often struggle to justify the initial costs of implementing technologies that haven’t yet gained widespread acceptance.
Starbucks offers its Global Academy course free of charge to suppliers interested in staying informed about the company’s procurement requirements. It is also free to other retailers aiming to reduce the environmental impact of their real estate.
Starbucks is navigating through financial turbulence while steadfastly committing to slash its carbon footprint for a greener future. The Greener Stores initiative shows how the company is leveraging sustainability to drive long-term growth and operational efficiency.
The post Starbucks Carbon Reductions Brewing Up As Stock Price Drops appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Climate Impact Partners Unveils High-Quality Carbon Credits from Sabah Rainforest in Malaysia
The voluntary carbon market is changing. Buyers are no longer focused only on large volumes of cheap credits. Instead, they want projects with strong science, long-term monitoring, and clear proof that carbon has truly been removed from the atmosphere. That shift is drawing more attention to high-integrity, nature-based projects.
One project now gaining that spotlight is the Sabah INFAPRO rainforest rehabilitation project in Malaysia. Climate Impact Partners announced that the project is now issuing verified carbon removal credits, opening access to one of the highest-quality nature-based removals currently available in the global market.
Restoring One of the World’s Richest Rainforest Ecosystems
The project is located in Sabah, Malaysia, on the island of Borneo. This region is home to tropical dipterocarp rainforest, one of the richest forest ecosystems on Earth. These forests store huge amounts of carbon and support extraordinary biodiversity. Some dipterocarp trees can grow up to 70 meters tall, creating habitat for orangutans, pygmy elephants, gibbons, sun bears, and the critically endangered Sumatran rhino.
However, the forest within the INFAPRO project area was not intact. In the 1980s, selective logging removed many of the most valuable tree species, especially large dipterocarps. That caused serious ecological damage. Once the key mother trees were gone, natural regeneration became much harder. Young seedlings also had to compete with dense vines and shrubs, which slowed the forest’s recovery.
To repair that damage, the INFAPRO project was launched in the Ulu-Segama forestry management unit in eastern Sabah.
- The project has restored more than 25,000 hectares of logged-over rainforest.
- It was developed by Face the Future in cooperation with Yayasan Sabah, while Climate Impact Partners has supported the project and helped bring its credits to market.
Why Sabah’s Carbon Removals are Attracting Attention
What makes Sabah INFAPRO different is not only the size of the restoration effort. It is also the way the project measured carbon gains.

Many forest carbon projects issue credits in annual vintages based on year-by-year growth estimates. Sabah INFAPRO followed a different path. It used a landscape-scale monitoring system and waited until the forest moved through its strongest natural growth period before issuing removal credits.
- This approach gives the credits more weight. Rather than relying mainly on short-term annual estimates, the project measured carbon sequestration over a longer period. That helps show that the forest delivered real, sustained, and measurable carbon removal.
The scientific backing is also unusually strong. Since 2007, the project has maintained nearly 400 permanent monitoring plots. These plots have allowed researchers, independent auditors, and technical specialists to observe the full growth cycle of dipterocarp forest recovery. The result is a large body of field data that supports carbon calculations and strengthens confidence in the credits.
In simple terms, buyers are not just being asked to trust a model. They are being shown years of direct forest monitoring across the project landscape.
Strong Ratings Support Market Confidence
Independent assessment has also lifted the project’s profile. BeZero awarded Sabah INFAPRO an A.pre overall rating and an AA score for permanence. That places the project among the highest-rated Improved Forest Management, or IFM, projects in the world.
The rating reflects several important strengths. First, the project has very low exposure to reversal risk. Second, it has a long and stable operating history. Third, its measured carbon gains align well with peer-reviewed ecological research and independent analysis.
These points matter in today’s market. Buyers have become more cautious after years of debate over the quality of some forest carbon credits. As a result, they now look more closely at durability, transparency, and third-party validation. Sabah INFAPRO’s rating helps answer those concerns and makes the project more attractive to companies looking for credible carbon removal.
The project is also registered with Verra’s Verified Carbon Standard under the name INFAPRO Rehabilitation of Logged-over Dipterocarp Forest in Sabah, Malaysia. That adds another level of market recognition and verification.
A Wider Model for Rainforest Recovery
Sabah INFAPRO also shows why high-quality nature-based projects are about more than carbon alone. The restoration effort supports broader ecological recovery in one of the world’s most important rainforest regions.
Climate Impact Partners said it has worked with project partners to restore degraded areas, run local training programs, carry out monthly forest patrols, and distribute seedlings to support rainforest recovery beyond the project boundary. These efforts help strengthen the wider landscape and expand the project’s environmental impact.
That broader value is becoming more important for buyers. Companies increasingly want projects that support biodiversity, ecosystem health, and local engagement, along with carbon removal. Sabah INFAPRO offers that mix, making it a stronger fit for the market’s shift toward higher-integrity credits.

The post Climate Impact Partners Unveils High-Quality Carbon Credits from Sabah Rainforest in Malaysia appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Bitcoin Falls as Energy Prices Rise: Why Crypto Is Now an Energy Market Story
Bitcoin’s recent drop below $70,000 reflects more than short-term market pressure. It signals a deeper shift. The world’s largest cryptocurrency is becoming increasingly tied to global energy markets.
For years, Bitcoin has moved mainly on investor sentiment, adoption trends, and regulation. Today, another force is shaping its direction: the cost of energy.
As oil prices rise and electricity markets tighten, Bitcoin is starting to behave less like a tech asset and more like an energy-dependent system. This shift is changing how investors, analysts, and policymakers understand crypto.
A Global Power Consumer: Inside Bitcoin’s Energy Use
Bitcoin depends on mining, a process that uses powerful computers to verify transactions. These machines run continuously and consume large amounts of electricity.
Data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration shows Bitcoin mining used between 67 and 240 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity in 2023, with a midpoint estimate of about 120 TWh.

Other estimates place consumption closer to 170 TWh per year in 2025. This accounts for roughly 0.5% of global electricity demand. Recently, as of February 2026, estimates see Bitcoin’s energy use reaching over 200 TWh per year.
That level of energy use is significant. Global electricity demand reached about 27,400 TWh in 2023. Bitcoin’s share may seem small, but it is comparable to the power use of mid-sized countries.
The network also requires steady power. Estimates suggest it draws around 10 gigawatts continuously, similar to several large power plants operating at full capacity. This constant demand makes energy costs central to Bitcoin’s economics.
When Oil Rises, Bitcoin Falls
Bitcoin mining is highly sensitive to electricity prices. Energy is the highest operating cost for miners. When power becomes more expensive, profit margins shrink.
Recent market movements show this link clearly. As oil prices rise and inflation concerns persist, energy costs have increased. At the same time, Bitcoin prices have weakened, falling below the $70,000 level.

This is not a coincidence. Studies show a direct relationship between Bitcoin prices, mining activity, and electricity use. When Bitcoin prices rise, more miners join the network, increasing energy demand. When energy costs rise, less efficient miners may shut down, reducing activity and adding selling pressure.
This creates a feedback loop between crypto and energy markets. Bitcoin is no longer driven only by demand and speculation. It is now influenced by the same forces that affect oil, gas, and power prices.
Cleaner Energy Use Is Growing, but Fossil Fuels Still Matter
Bitcoin’s environmental impact depends on its energy mix. This mix is improving, but it remains uneven.
A 2025 study from the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance found that 52.4% of Bitcoin mining now uses sustainable energy. This includes both renewable sources (42.6%) and nuclear power (9.8%). The share has risen significantly from about 37.6% in 2022.
Despite this progress, fossil fuels still account for a large portion of mining energy. Natural gas alone makes up about 38.2%, while coal continues to contribute a smaller share.

This reliance on fossil fuels keeps emissions high. Current estimates suggest Bitcoin produces more than 114 million tons of carbon dioxide each year. That puts it in line with emissions from some industrial sectors.
The shift toward cleaner energy is real, but it is not complete. The pace of change will play a key role in how Bitcoin fits into global climate goals.
Bitcoin’s Climate Debate Intensifies
Bitcoin’s growing energy demand has placed it at the center of ESG discussions. Its impact is often measured through three key areas:
- Total electricity use, which rivals that of entire countries.
- Carbon emissions are estimated at over 100 million tons of CO₂ annually.
- Energy intensity, with a single transaction using large amounts of power.

At the same time, the industry is evolving. Mining companies are adopting more efficient hardware and exploring new energy sources. Some operations use excess renewable power or capture waste energy, such as flare gas from oil fields.
These efforts show progress, but they do not fully address the concerns. The gap between Bitcoin’s energy use and its environmental impact remains a key issue for investors and regulators.
- MUST READ: Bitcoin Price Hits All-Time High Above $126K: ETFs, Market Drivers, and the Future of Digital Gold
Bitcoin Is Becoming Part of the Energy System
Bitcoin mining is now closely integrated with the broader energy system. Operators often choose locations based on access to cheap or excess electricity. This includes areas with strong renewable generation or underused energy resources.
This integration creates both opportunities and challenges. On one hand, mining can support energy systems by using power that might otherwise go to waste. It can also provide flexible demand that helps stabilize grids.
On the other hand, it can increase pressure on local electricity supplies and extend the use of fossil fuels if cleaner options are not available.
In the United States, Bitcoin mining could account for up to 2.3% of total electricity demand in certain scenarios. This highlights how quickly the sector is scaling and how closely it is tied to national energy systems.
Energy Markets Are Now Key to Bitcoin’s Future
Looking ahead, the connection between Bitcoin and energy is expected to grow stronger. The network’s computing power, or hash rate, continues to reach new highs, which typically leads to higher energy use.
Electricity will remain the main cost for miners. This means Bitcoin will continue to respond to changes in energy prices and supply conditions. At the same time, governments are starting to pay closer attention to crypto’s environmental impact, which could shape future regulations.

Some forecasts suggest Bitcoin’s energy use could rise sharply if adoption increases, potentially reaching up to 400 TWh in extreme scenarios. However, cleaner energy systems could reduce the carbon impact over time.
Bitcoin is no longer just a financial asset. It is also a large-scale energy consumer and a growing part of the global power system.
As a result, understanding Bitcoin now requires a broader view. Energy prices, electricity markets, and carbon trends are becoming just as important as market demand and investor sentiment.
The message is clear. As energy markets move, Bitcoin is likely to move with them.
The post Bitcoin Falls as Energy Prices Rise: Why Crypto Is Now an Energy Market Story appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
LEGO’s Virginia Factory Goes Big on Solar as Net-Zero Push Speeds Up
The post LEGO’s Virginia Factory Goes Big on Solar as Net-Zero Push Speeds Up appeared first on Carbon Credits.
-
Greenhouse Gases7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Renewable Energy2 years ago
GAF Energy Completes Construction of Second Manufacturing Facility








