South Korea plans to require large companies to publish mandatory sustainability reports starting in 2028. The rule will apply first to major firms listed on the country’s main stock exchange.
Starting in 2028, KOSPI (the largest South Korean stocks) companies with at least 30 trillion won (around $22 billion) in assets will need to reveal their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices.
South Korea’s Sustainability Reporting Era Begins
The reporting requirement will expand in 2029 to companies with 10 trillion won or more in assets. The first phase will focus on about 58 of South Korea‘s largest listed companies. This is based on estimates from the Financial Services Commission (FSC).
Companies must publish clear details on climate risks, emissions, governance, and sustainability strategies. These disclosures will cover greenhouse gas emissions, climate financial risks, and plans to achieve climate goals.
The government says the policy will improve transparency for investors and strengthen confidence in Korea’s financial markets. It will also help the country align with global ESG reporting standards that investors increasingly expect.
South Korea has big industrial companies operating in electronics, cars, steel, and shipbuilding. These industries play a major role in global supply chains. Clear sustainability reporting could help these companies maintain access to international capital and markets.
A Gradual Rollout to Ease Corporate Burden
In 2026, South Korea’s Financial Services Commission released a roadmap for ESG disclosure. The policy forms part of the government’s broader strategy to support the country’s green transition.

Officials decided on a phased rollout to give companies enough time to prepare. Key elements of the plan include:
- Mandatory ESG reporting for large KOSPI companies starting in 2028.
- Expansion to additional companies in 2029.
- Full adoption of supply-chain emissions reporting by 2031.
Companies will receive a three-year grace period before they must disclose Scope 3 emissions. These emissions include indirect emissions across a company’s value chain. These can come from suppliers, transportation, product use, and waste.
For many firms, Scope 3 emissions represent the largest share of total emissions. The Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) states that Scope 3 emissions can be over 11 times greater than direct operational emissions for many companies.
Regulators gave companies more time to create systems for measuring these emissions due to the complexity involved.
Initially, the rules will operate through stock exchange disclosure requirements. Over time, the government plans to convert them into formal legal reporting obligations.
How Climate Finance Powers Korea’s Green Shift
The new reporting framework supports South Korea’s broader climate policy and energy transition. The government aims to raise about 790 trillion won (around $590 billion) by 2032.
The funding will support climate-related investments and help industries modernize and reduce emissions. Priority sectors include renewable energy, hydrogen technologies, green infrastructure, low-carbon manufacturing, and energy efficiency upgrades.
Heavy industries are a key focus of these efforts. South Korea is a top producer of steel, petrochemicals, and semiconductors, which need a lot of energy. The country generates 33% of its electricity from coal, per International Energy Agency data.

The IEA says South Korea was one of the top ten energy consumers in 2024. Industry made up a large part of the electricity demand. The government will introduce transition finance frameworks. These will help high-emission industries get funding for cleaner technologies.

South Korea has pledged to reach carbon neutrality by 2050. The country also aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 40% below 2018 levels by 2030 under its updated climate plan. Stronger ESG reporting will help investors measure corporate progress toward these goals.

Why Mandatory ESG Reporting Is Going Global
South Korea’s policy reflects a global shift toward mandatory sustainability reporting. Governments and regulators increasingly require companies to disclose climate risks and emissions data. These rules show how climate change and energy policies can impact businesses.
The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is a major reporting framework. The rule will eventually apply to around 50,000 companies operating in Europe, according to the European Commission.
Global standards are also emerging. The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) released two key disclosure standards in 2023:
- IFRS S1, covering general sustainability disclosures
- IFRS S2, covering climate-related disclosures
More than 20 jurisdictions representing over half of global GDP have announced plans to adopt or align with ISSB standards. South Korea’s reporting framework follows these international guidelines.
The country set up the Korea Sustainability Standards Board (KSSB). Its job is to create national reporting standards that match the ISSB framework.
Companies will be required to disclose:
- climate risks and opportunities,
- governance structures for sustainability oversight,
- emissions data and reduction targets, and
- strategy and risk management practices.
This alignment helps investors compare companies across different markets using similar data.
Korean Corporations Step Up Sustainability Disclosures
Corporate sustainability reporting has already expanded in South Korea. By 2024, about 203 Korean companies will publish voluntary sustainability reports. This comes from ESG research groups that track disclosure trends.
Large Korean firms have increasingly adopted global reporting frameworks such as:
- Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)
- Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)
- Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB)
However, many companies asked regulators to delay mandatory reporting requirements. Businesses said they need more time to create reliable emissions measurement systems and reporting processes.
The government responded by pushing the start date to 2028. The extra time helps companies create internal ESG management systems and enhance data collection. Financial institutions strongly support stronger sustainability disclosure.
Investors increasingly use ESG data when evaluating risk and long-term performance. According to the Global Sustainable Investment Alliance, sustainable investment assets reached over $30 trillion globally in recent years. Analysts forecast it to reach $40 trillion by 2030.

Transparent ESG reporting helps companies attract capital from these investors. It also helps banks and asset managers assess climate risks across their portfolios.
The Future of ESG Disclosure in Asia
South Korea’s new rules could influence ESG reporting across Asia. Several financial centers in the region are strengthening climate reporting policies.
For instance, Japan plans to expand sustainability disclosure rules for major companies beginning around 2027. The country now requires climate risk disclosures for companies on its Prime Market. These disclosures must follow the TCFD framework.
Singapore and Hong Kong are both starting mandatory climate reporting that will follow ISSB standards. China is also expanding its climate disclosure rules to other major sectors.
- SEE MORE: China Expands Carbon Reporting to Airlines and Heavy Industry in Major Climate Disclosure Shift
These developments reflect growing pressure from global investors. Many asset managers now need detailed climate data from companies. They use this information before deciding on investments.
Consistent reporting frameworks also help multinational companies operate across multiple markets. Large corporations often face different disclosure rules in different countries. Aligning with global standards can reduce compliance costs and improve transparency.
As more countries adopt ESG reporting rules, sustainability reporting may become as common as financial reporting.
Transparency as the New Standard in Global Markets
South Korea’s plan to introduce mandatory sustainability reporting in 2028 marks a major step in the country’s climate and financial policy. The phased rollout will start with the largest listed companies and later expand to more firms. Companies will need to disclose detailed data on emissions, climate risks, and sustainability strategies.
The policy aims to improve transparency for investors and align South Korea with global ESG reporting standards. As sustainability disclosure becomes more common worldwide, companies with strong climate strategies and clear reporting systems may gain an advantage in global capital markets.
The post South Korea Mandates ISSB-Aligned Climate Reporting by 2028 for Corporate Giants appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

