Connect with us

Published

on

Solar energy started to emerge in Georgia in 2012. Coincidentally, that was around the same time that Southern Company began construction on Plant Vogtle nuclear units 3 and 4.

Plant Vogtle Unit 3 became operational earlier this year and Unit 4 is expected to be online by Q1 of 2024. However, when the Georgia Public Service Commission (PSC) certified these units for construction back in 2009, they were expected to be completed in 2016 and 2017. The fact that they are seven years past due and more than double the original budget has been well documented.

Over that same period while Vogtle 3 & 4 have been under construction, 4,500 MW of solar capacity (MW) has been developed in Georgia and at just 1/5 the cost of those two Vogtle units. By comparison, Vogtle 3 & 4 will eventually provide 2,200 MW of capacity for Georgia.

Before you retort “But the sun doesn’t shine all the time” — I am well aware. That, too, has been explored rather extensively. I’ll refer you to this enlightening podcast by Volts: What? The sun isn’t always shining?!

It is indeed constructive to consider the amount of energy generated (MWh) from solar in addition to the overall capacity (MW) constructed. Although nuclear units generally produce power for more hours in a day than solar projects do, that is only true after construction is finished.

Those solar units have been already generating for years, with even more solar planned to come online in the coming years. Meanwhile, Vogtle 3 just started generating this year (with Vogtle 4 further delayed until 2024). It got me wondering: how long will it take those new nuclear units (operating 24 hours per day) to produce as much electricity as solar units have already produced and are expected to produce into the future?

Spoiler Alert: Vogtle 3 & 4 won’t catch up!

If Vogtle 3 & 4 had been completed on-time, the situation could have been different. Nuclear output would have had the lead after 2016 and it would have taken until 2032 before the expected cumulative solar output eclipsed nuclear.

But because of the multi-year delays in starting up Vogtle 3 & 4, solar has built up such a lead that the new nuclear units may never catch up. And since the plans in Georgia forecast continued solar buildout with no new nuclear plants currently planned — even with continuous operation, the cumulative output from those new nukes will never exceed the cumulative output from solar.

This graph shows the output for Georgia Power’s share of Vogtle 3 & 4 (45.7% = 1 GW) compared to the generation from solar projects supplying the Georgia Power system (3 GW now, and continuing to grow).

The closest the Vogtle 3 & 4 output comes is in 2025 when those units are fully dispatched and new solar buildout (already approved) is continuing but not yet operational. By 2026, the annual output of solar is expected to exceed the annual output of Vogtle 3 & 4; so from that point onward, the cumulative margin of victory for solar will only increase.

As clean energy advocates, SACE anticipates even further and faster expansion of solar as we approach 2030 and beyond. This is precisely what climate science indicates is necessary.

The post Solar has been quietly running up the score during delayed Vogtle 3 & 4 construction appeared first on SACE | Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.

Solar has been quietly running up the score during delayed Vogtle 3 & 4 construction

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Rooftop Wind

Published

on

My doctor, who knows that I understand physics and renewable energy in particular, asked me today what I thought about wind turbines on boats.

I explained that, since boats need their own ways to generate electricity, what is called “small wind” may make sense. Most ships have diesel-powered generators, and that’s an option for smaller craft as well, and solar is not an attractive option because of the small area.

Doctors generally don’t have time to kill, but he asked me further about small wind, to which I explained:

Because the area of a circle is proportional to the square of the radius, big is better.  If you can build a turbine with a radius 100 times larger than a small one, you’re going to generate 10,000 time more power.

Because the power generated by a turbine is proportional to the cube of the wind’s velocity, if you can site a turbine in wind conditions that are 10 times those on your rooftop, with trees and other buildings slowing the wind down, you’re going to generate 1000 times more power.

So, as usual, the answer resides in physics and math. 1000 times 10,000 is 10 million, which is why we see huge turbines on structures that lift huge turbines high above the ground, and it’s why the small wind industry has essentially disappeared.

If you don’t understand elementary school math and high school science, and you have money to burn, the investment offered at left may be right for you.

Rooftop Wind

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Fox News and its Effects on American Civilization

Published

on

It’s interesting that there is no Fox News (or equivalent) in Canada.

The Canadians have protections of free speech that are very similar to ours in the States, and, like the U.S., these rights are not absolute.  One difference is that Canada prohibits gross misrepresentation, which, in this case means that presenting opinions and calling it “news” is against the law. Lies are fine; calling them “news” is not.

A possible name for a show with the same content might be “Conservative Viewpoints” or “The Way the Right Wing Sees the World.”

Where Canada protects its people from malicious bullshit, in America we say, “Money talks.”

Fox News and its Effects on American Civilization

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

Apathy in the Midst of Treason

Published

on

Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich makes an excellent point at left.

The constant onslaught of distractions coming out of Trump’s mouth is calculated make us give up striving for truth, honesty, and environmental responsibility.

We mustn’t quit.

Apathy in the Midst of Treason

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com