Solar energy started to emerge in Georgia in 2012. Coincidentally, that was around the same time that Southern Company began construction on Plant Vogtle nuclear units 3 and 4.
Plant Vogtle Unit 3 became operational earlier this year and Unit 4 is expected to be online by Q1 of 2024. However, when the Georgia Public Service Commission (PSC) certified these units for construction back in 2009, they were expected to be completed in 2016 and 2017. The fact that they are seven years past due and more than double the original budget has been well documented.
Over that same period while Vogtle 3 & 4 have been under construction, 4,500 MW of solar capacity (MW) has been developed in Georgia and at just 1/5 the cost of those two Vogtle units. By comparison, Vogtle 3 & 4 will eventually provide 2,200 MW of capacity for Georgia.
Before you retort “But the sun doesn’t shine all the time” — I am well aware. That, too, has been explored rather extensively. I’ll refer you to this enlightening podcast by Volts: What? The sun isn’t always shining?!
It is indeed constructive to consider the amount of energy generated (MWh) from solar in addition to the overall capacity (MW) constructed. Although nuclear units generally produce power for more hours in a day than solar projects do, that is only true after construction is finished.
Those solar units have been already generating for years, with even more solar planned to come online in the coming years. Meanwhile, Vogtle 3 just started generating this year (with Vogtle 4 further delayed until 2024). It got me wondering: how long will it take those new nuclear units (operating 24 hours per day) to produce as much electricity as solar units have already produced and are expected to produce into the future?
Spoiler Alert: Vogtle 3 & 4 won’t catch up!
If Vogtle 3 & 4 had been completed on-time, the situation could have been different. Nuclear output would have had the lead after 2016 and it would have taken until 2032 before the expected cumulative solar output eclipsed nuclear.
But because of the multi-year delays in starting up Vogtle 3 & 4, solar has built up such a lead that the new nuclear units may never catch up. And since the plans in Georgia forecast continued solar buildout with no new nuclear plants currently planned — even with continuous operation, the cumulative output from those new nukes will never exceed the cumulative output from solar.
This graph shows the output for Georgia Power’s share of Vogtle 3 & 4 (45.7% = 1 GW) compared to the generation from solar projects supplying the Georgia Power system (3 GW now, and continuing to grow).

The closest the Vogtle 3 & 4 output comes is in 2025 when those units are fully dispatched and new solar buildout (already approved) is continuing but not yet operational. By 2026, the annual output of solar is expected to exceed the annual output of Vogtle 3 & 4; so from that point onward, the cumulative margin of victory for solar will only increase.
As clean energy advocates, SACE anticipates even further and faster expansion of solar as we approach 2030 and beyond. This is precisely what climate science indicates is necessary.
The post Solar has been quietly running up the score during delayed Vogtle 3 & 4 construction appeared first on SACE | Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.
Solar has been quietly running up the score during delayed Vogtle 3 & 4 construction
Renewable Energy
ACORE Statement on Treasury’s Safe Harbor Guidance
ACORE Statement on Treasury’s Safe Harbor Guidance
Statement from American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE) President and CEO Ray Long on Treasury’s Safe Harbor Guidance:
“The American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE) is deeply concerned that today’s Treasury guidance on the long-standing ‘beginning of construction’ safe harbor significantly undermines its proven effectiveness, is inconsistent with the law, and creates unnecessary uncertainty for renewable energy development in the United States.
“For over a decade, the safe harbor provisions have served as clear, accountable rules of the road – helping to reduce compliance burdens, foster private investment, and ensure taxpayer protections. These guardrails have been integral to delivering affordable, reliable American clean energy while maintaining transparency and adherence to the rule of law. This was recognized in the One Big Beautiful Act, which codified the safe harbor rules, now changed by this action.
“We need to build more power generation now, and that includes renewable energy. The U.S. will need roughly 118 gigawatts (the equivalent of 12 New York Cities) of new power generation in the next four years to prevent price spikes and potential shortages. Only a limited set of technologies – solar, wind, batteries, and some natural gas – can be built at that scale in that timeframe.”
###
ABOUT ACORE
For over 20 years, the American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE) has been the nation’s leading voice on the issues most essential to clean energy expansion. ACORE unites finance, policy, and technology to accelerate the transition to a clean energy economy. For more information, please visit http://www.acore.org.
Media Contacts:
Stephanie Genco
Senior Vice President, Communications
American Council on Renewable Energy
genco@acore.org
The post ACORE Statement on Treasury’s Safe Harbor Guidance appeared first on ACORE.
https://acore.org/news/acore-statement-on-treasurys-safe-harbor-guidance/
Renewable Energy
Should I Get a Solar Battery Storage System?
Renewable Energy
Wine Grapes and Climate Change
I just spoke with a guy in the wine industry, and I asked him how, if at all, climate change is affecting what we does.
From his perspective, it’s the horrific wildfires whose smoke imbues (or “taints”) the grapes with an unpleasant flavor that needs to be modified, normally by creative methods of blending.
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Spanish-language misinformation on renewable energy spreads online, report shows
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Carbon Footprint1 year ago
US SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Why airlines are perfect targets for anti-greenwashing legal action
-
Renewable Energy2 months ago
US Grid Strain, Possible Allete Sale
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Some firms unaware of England’s new single-use plastic ban