The Trump administration is set to update America’s quantum computing strategy, reports Cyberscoop. This comes from executives and former national security officials. The plan may involve new executive orders and a national action plan. It will be like the White House’s July AI roadmap. This plan focuses on keeping U.S. leadership in new technologies.
Let’s explore what quantum computing really is, examine the market forecast, and highlight the stocks riding this emerging wave.
Quantum Computing: A Market on the Rise
Quantum computing is an emerging investment space with the potential to transform how information is processed. Experts believe that this technology could reshape cybersecurity, finance, defense, and global communications.
Unlike traditional computers that use bits as 0 or 1, quantum computers use qubits, which can exist in multiple states at once. This ability allows them to solve complex problems thousands of times faster than today’s supercomputers.
The networking system uses rules of quantum mechanics to create ultra-secure communication systems. Instead of relying on encryption that future quantum machines could break, it uses entanglement. It’s a process that links particles across long distances to transmit information instantly and securely.
Simply put, quantum networks deliver unconditional data protection and enable advanced tools like quantum teleportation, transforming how information moves.
- With governments pouring money into research, the global quantum networking market is projected to grow from $1.15 billion in 2025 to $42.11 billion by 2035, representing a massive 43.4% CAGR.
Experts also predict that the quantum computing sector holds huge promise and could rival the impact of artificial intelligence (AI).

Carbon Footprint of Quantum Computing
A 2023 research report found that running large quantum simulations, like a 43-qubit system, could generate 48 times more CO₂ equivalent emissions than training a typical transformer-based machine learning model.
Quantum computing is more computationally efficient than classical supercomputers. This can reduce energy needs for future simulations and AI tasks. Scientists also say that if quantum processors utilize renewable energy and optimized algorithms, their carbon footprint may be much smaller than that of traditional high-performance computing centers.
Thus, to lessen the environmental impact of quantum technology, the industry needs:
-
Sustainable manufacturing of quantum hardware
-
Energy-efficient system designs
-
Responsible sourcing of rare earth elements and other materials
Researchers are looking into “carbon-aware quantum computing.” This means tracking and managing the entire life-cycle carbon footprint of quantum technology.
As the industry aims to cut emissions, quantum computing is expected to help decarbonize other sectors.
Decarbonization Potential
Quantum computing supports low-carbon solutions by modeling materials, chemical reactions, and energy systems beyond classical limits. It enhances batteries, improves solar panels, optimizes carbon capture, and refines hydrogen processes. It also aids in creating cleaner cement and optimizing energy grids.
With faster and more accurate simulations, quantum computing can reduce emissions across industries and support the green transition.
U.S. Pushes Quantum Computing Overhaul as Industry Gains Billions
Cyberscoop further reported that the White House is weighing steps to push federal agencies toward post-quantum cryptographic protections. The urgency stems from a looming future in which quantum computers could crack today’s encryption, threatening financial systems, government databases, and defense communications.
The Office of Science and Technology Policy and the Department of Commerce are said to be leading these efforts. A senior executive in the field revealed that “everyone in the quantum industry has heard some version of the message that the White House wants to replicate for quantum what they did for AI in July.”
Paul Dabbar, a former Department of Energy official and now Commerce Deputy Secretary, is reportedly at the center of the initiative. Dabbar previously launched a quantum networking startup, giving him unique insight into both the research and commercial sides of the industry.
Cybersecurity and Geopolitics Drive Action
Washington has long recognized the risks of outdated encryption, pushing contractors for over a decade to adopt stronger post-quantum algorithms. But migration has been slow, sparking fears that the U.S. may fall behind in the global race for secure communications.
Rising geopolitical competition has intensified those concerns. With rival nations investing heavily in quantum research, U.S. leaders see a coordinated national strategy as critical to maintaining technological dominance.
If finalized, the federal push could deliver significant benefits for publicly traded quantum companies such as Rigetti Computing (RGTI), IONQ (IONQ), D-Wave Quantum (QBTS), and Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT). Government contracts, clearer priorities, and investor confidence could drive further growth across the sector.
Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT) Lands $500M, Shares Surge
Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT) boosted the sector on September 21 by raising $500 million in a private placement that was oversubscribed. This is one of the largest quantum funding rounds this year. The deal boosted the Hoboken-based firm’s cash position to about $850 million.
The company will issue over 26.8 million shares to institutional investors. This includes support from major existing shareholders and a new global alternative asset manager. Following the news, QUBT shares jumped 26.8% to $23.27, increasing its market cap to $3.72 billion.
CEO Dr. Yuping Huang called the deal a strong vote of confidence. He noted it was priced at a premium compared to the last four offerings. Titan Partners Group, a division of American Capital Partners, managed the placement.
So far in 2025, QUBT stock has risen more than 40% year-to-date. This highlights growing investor enthusiasm for quantum optics and computing firms.

Rigetti Rides $5.8M Air Force Deal: RGTI Stock Surges
Meanwhile, Rigetti Computing is growing its government partnerships. On September 18, the company announced a three-year contract worth $5.8 million with the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL). This contract aims to advance superconducting quantum networking. Rigetti will collaborate with Dutch startup QphoX, known for its quantum transduction technology.
The project tackles a big challenge: changing microwave signals that control qubits into optical photons. These photons can travel long distances through fiber-optic cables. This advance could link smaller quantum processors. It would create distributed quantum systems, similar to classical high-performance computing clusters.
Rigetti CEO Dr. Subodh Kulkarni called the partnership a significant step forward. He highlighted the strengths of Rigetti, QphoX, and AFRL in building hybrid quantum networks.
The company’s market cap has climbed to $9.25 billion. It’s up 10.4% in the past month, showing strong investor interest as funding and commercial traction grow in 2025. The stock was trading near $28.37 as of September 22, 2025, after reaching a recent high of $29.59. This momentum comes from a major analyst price target upgrade and key contract wins.

Quantum technology is being adopted by organizations, defense departments, and global markets. Defense agencies are racing to use quantum systems for national security. Government funding is increasing. Corporate investment is picking up speed. Breakthrough research is underway. The industry is entering a crucial phase.
If the White House’s plans to launch a new quantum strategy succeed, it could boost U.S. cybersecurity. It would also send a clear message to investors and innovators: quantum is not just the future; it’s already here.
The post Quantum Stocks Rally: Rigetti (RGTI) & Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT) Surge on U.S. Strategy appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

