Connect with us

Published

on

Anabella Rosemberg is senior advisor on Just Transition at Climate Action Network International (CAN-I).

This May Day, the battle lines are clear: workers’ rights and climate justice must stand together – or we will all fall together.

Jobs or the environment? For too long, politicians and corporations have framed the conversation as a false choice. Too often, environmentalists were lured into that same trap – crafting climate strategies aimed at convincing the privileged, while working people, especially those in polluting industries, were sidelined. Solidarity existed in moments, but the struggles for climate justice and labour rights ran on parallel tracks.

Then came an idea that reshaped our movements: Just Transition.

This Australian coal community is co-designing its own green future

Born in the US labour movement in the 1970s, Just Transition began as a simple, urgent demand: no worker should have to choose between a pay cheque and their health. Since then, it has grown into a global framework recognised by the International Labour Organization and the Paris Agreement, linking climate ambition to dignity, rights and economic justice. But on the ground, the promises remain far from reality.

This week, a new call for help reached us.

Court backs Colombian coal workers

The Colombian unions SINTRAMINERGETICA and SINTRACARBÓN have raised the alarm over Glencore’s conduct in Cesar and Magdalena, where the mining multinational is shutting down coal operations through its subsidiary Prodeco. More than 1,200 direct workers and 5,000 contractors have already been dismissed since 2020, as the company handed back its mining licenses in the country’s first “Just Transition” pilot zone.

Despite posting $10.6 billion in profits last year, Glencore has been accused of conducting only a single, superficial community meeting before walking away – prompting Colombia’s Constitutional Court to rule that it violated due process and failed to properly consult affected communities. The court has now ordered the company to reopen talks with more than 20,000 impacted people across four municipalities.

Critics argue the company is rushing the coal closure to cut costs, sidestepping the comprehensive social, environmental and labour measures a true just transition would require. Without proper investment, it is Colombian workers and communities – not Glencore – who will be left to bear the long-term costs. 

This injustice is not isolated.

Spain shows the way

From Mpumalanga in South Africa to East Kalimantan in Indonesia, from Katowice in Poland to Cesar in Colombia, corporations are abandoning the very communities that built their wealth – sometimes even daring to call it climate leadership.

Transitions are happening without justice – without workers, without communities, without dignity. But none of this is inevitable. Deciding who designs and who pays the cost of the transition is a political choice.

But many countries, especially in the Global South, do not have such resources, nor the chance to diversify their economies. Without international support, they will be left behind.

Coal-reliant South African provinces falling behind on just transition

Examples of a different path are already out there. When a coal phase-out was decided, the Spanish government forced negotiations with trade unions, delivered sweeping support plans, and mobilised EU resources through the Just Transition Mechanism.

We will stand with our brothers and sisters in Colombia and all those on the frontlines of the transition. However, playing whack-a-mole with each crisis, site by site, is no strategy. We need something bigger. We need a global plan for Just Transition. 

Time for a Global Just Transition Mechanism

Two years ago, at the UN climate talks, governments created the Just Transition Work Programme – a breakthrough for embedding social justice into climate action. Despite setbacks – especially at COP29 in Baku – the Work Programme still holds transformative potential.

Now, as we look toward COP30 in Brazil, the stakes could not be clearer.

At COP30, governments must act. They must agree that Just Transition policies – social protection for those losing their jobs and income, re-skilling, community investment, cleaning up polluted areas – are not optional extras, but fundamental to real climate ambition and justice.

After Baku setback, activists call for ‘just transition’ to be front and centre at COP30

They must launch a Global Just Transition Mechanism: to coordinate efforts internationally; to channel support to countries without the means to act alone; and to ensure true accountability and community participation. They must commit to the inclusion of workers, unions, civil society and impacted communities, to diversify economies and to produce real sectoral transition plans.

Ideas can be powerful drivers of change. And Just Transition is one of those ideas. But we must protect it from being hijacked by those who seek to delay climate action under its name, and from corporations that try to greenwash exploitation.

Movement rising for COP30

The enemies of Just Transition wear two masks: one, the face of denial and delay, bankrolled by fossil fuel interests; the other, the smiling face of companies across all sectors who talk about “green growth” while sacrificing workers on the altar of market logic. Both serve the few – and betray the many. 

The only path forward lies with the majority: the workers, the communities, the people who today commemorate the Martyrs of Chicago (who were wrongly convicted of murder when they opposed their city’s elite businessmen) and the long, unfinished struggle for dignity and rights. It is only with these working people that we will build a just, livable future. Now is the time to put people and planet before private profit.

The mainstream media may not fully capture it yet. But a movement for Just Transition is rising. Trade unions, social movements, environmentalists, working people – we are converging. And our next fight will be at COP30 in Brazil: a fight for workers and communities.

This May Day, the call is clear: green must be just – or it will not be green at all. COP30 will find us united, fighting for dignity for all on a living planet.

The post On May Day, workers are calling – and climate activists must answer  appeared first on Climate Home News.

On May Day, workers are calling – and climate activists must answer 

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Corpus Christi Cuts Timeline to Disaster as Abbott Issues Emergency Orders

Published

on

The governor’s office said the city’s two main reservoirs could dry up by May, much sooner than previous timelines. But authorities still offer no plan for curtailment of water use.

City officials in Corpus Christi on Tuesday released modeling that showed emergency cuts to water demand could be required as soon as May as reservoir levels continue to decline.

Corpus Christi Cuts Timeline to Disaster as Abbott Issues Emergency Orders

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Middle East war is another wake-up call for fossil fuel-reliant food systems

Published

on

Lena Luig is the head of the International Agricultural Policy Division at the Heinrich Böll Foundation, a member of the Global Alliance for the Future of Food. Anna Lappé is the Executive Director of the Global Alliance for the Future of Food.

As toxic clouds loom over Tehran and Beirut from the US and Israel’s bombardment of oil depots and civilian infrastructure in the region’s ongoing war, the world is once again witnessing the not-so-subtle connections between conflict, hunger, food insecurity and the vulnerability of global food systems dependent on fossil fuels, dominated by a few powerful countries and corporations.

The conflict in Iran is having a huge impact on the world’s fertilizer supply. The Strait of Hormuz is a critical trade route in the region for nearly half of the global supply of urea, the main synthetic fertilizer derived from natural gas through the conversion of ammonia.

With the Strait impacted by Iran’s blockades, prices of urea have shot up by 35% since the war started, just as planting season starts in many parts of the world, putting millions of farmers and consumers at risk of increasing production costs and food price spikes, resulting in food insecurity, particularly for low-income households. The World Food Programme has projected that an extra 45 million people would be pushed ​into acute hunger because of rises in food, oil and shipping costs, if the war continues until June.

Pesticides and synthetic fertilizer leave system fragile

On the face of it, this looks like a supply chain issue, but at the core of this crisis lies a truth about many of our food systems around the world: the instability and injustice in the very design of systems so reliant on these fossil fuel inputs for our food.

At the Global Alliance, a strategic alliance of philanthropic foundations working to transform food systems, we have been documenting the fossil fuel-food nexus, raising alarm about the fragility of a system propped up by fossil fuels, with 15% of annual fossil fuel use going into food systems, in part because of high-cost, fossil fuel-based inputs like pesticides and synthetic fertilizer. The Heinrich Böll Foundation has also been flagging this threat consistently, most recently in the Pesticide Atlas and Soil Atlas compendia. 

We’ve seen this before: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 sparked global disruptions in fertilizer supply and food price volatility. As the conflict worsened, fertilizer prices spiked – as much from input companies capitalizing on the crisis for speculation as from real cost increases from production and transport – triggering a food price crisis around the world.

    Since then, fertilizer industry profit margins have continued to soar. In 2022, the largest nine fertilizer producers increased their profit margins by more than 35% compared to the year before—when fertilizer prices were already high. As Lena Bassermann and Dr. Gideon Tups underscore in the Heinrich Böll Foundation’s Soil Atlas, the global dependencies of nitrogen fertilizer impacted economies around the world, especially state budgets in already indebted and import-dependent economies, as well as farmers across Africa.

    Learning lessons from the war in Ukraine, many countries invested heavily in renewable energy and/or increased domestic oil production as a way to decrease dependency on foreign fossil fuels. But few took the same approach to reimagining domestic food systems and their food sovereignty.

    Agroecology as an alternative

    There is another way. Governments can adopt policy frameworks to encourage reductions in synthetic fertilizer and pesticide use, especially in regions that currently massively overuse nitrogen fertilizer. At the African Union fertilizer and Soil Health Summit in 2024, African leaders at least agreed that organic fertilizers should be subsidized as well, not only mineral fertilizers, but we can go farther in actively promoting agricultural pathways that reduce fossil fuel dependency. 

    In 2024, the Global Alliance organized dozens of philanthropies to call for a tenfold increase in investments to help farmers transition from fossil fuel dependency towards agroecological approaches that prioritize livelihoods, health, climate, and biodiversity.

    In our research, we detail the huge opportunity to repurpose harmful subsidies currently supporting inputs like synthetic fertilizer and pesticides towards locally-sourced bio-inputs and biofertilizer production. We know this works: There are powerful stories of hope and change from those who have made this transition, despite only receiving a fraction of the financing that industrial agriculture receives, with evidence of benefits from stable incomes and livelihoods to better health and climate outcomes.

    New summit in Colombia seeks to revive stalled UN talks on fossil fuel transition

    Inspiring examples abound: G-BIACK in Kenya is training farmers how to produce their own high-quality compost; start-ups like the Evola Company in Cambodia are producing both nutrient-rich organic fertilizer and protein-rich animal feed with black soldier fly farming; Sabon Sake in Ghana is enriching sugarcane bagasse – usually organic waste – with microbial agents and earthworms to turn it into a rich vermicompost.

    These efforts, grounded in ecosystems and tapping nature for soil fertility and to manage pest pressures, are just some of the countless examples around the world, tapping the skill and knowledge of millions of farmers. On a national and global policy level, the Agroecology Coalition, with 480+ members, including governments, civil society organizations, academic institutions, and philanthropic foundations, is supporting a transition toward agroecology, working with natural systems to produce abundant food, boost biodiversity, and foster community well-being.

    Fertilizer industry spins “clean” products

    We must also inoculate ourselves from the fertilizer industry’s public relations spin, which includes promoting the promise that their products can be produced without heavy reliance on fossil fuels. Despite experts debunking the viability of what the industry has dubbed “green hydrogen” or “green or clean ammonia”, the sector still promotes this narrative, arguing that these are produced with resource-intensive renewable energy or Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), a costly and unreliable technology for reducing emissions.

    As we mourn this conflict’s senseless destruction and death, including hundreds of children, we also recognize that peace cannot mean a return to business-as-usual. We need to upend the systems that allow the richest and most powerful to have dominion over so much.

    This includes fighting for a food system that is based on genuine sovereignty and justice, free from dependency on fossil fuels, one that honors natural systems and puts power into the hands of communities and food producers themselves.

    The post Middle East war is another wake-up call for fossil fuel-reliant food systems appeared first on Climate Home News.

    Middle East war is another wake-up call for fossil fuel-reliant food systems

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    Are There Climate Fingerprints in Tornado Activity?

    Published

    on

    Parts of the Southern and Northeastern U.S. faced tornado threats this week. Scientists are trying to parse out the climate links in changing tornado activity.

    It’s been a weird few weeks for weather across the United States.

    Are There Climate Fingerprints in Tornado Activity?

    Continue Reading

    Trending

    Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com