The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market (ICVCM) has officially endorsed five carbon credit methodologies: three for biochar and two for Improved Forest Management (IFM) as meeting its Core Carbon Principles (CCPs). One additional IFM methodology received conditional approval, pending adjustments.
This decision marks a significant milestone for Verra and other carbon market stakeholders, signaling stronger quality assurance for nature-based climate solutions.
ICVCM: Setting a High Bar for Carbon Credit Quality
The ICVCM is an independent, non-profit body dedicated to ensuring voluntary carbon markets deliver credible climate action. Its CCP label acts as a global benchmark for high-quality carbon credits.
To earn this label, a methodology must meet strict criteria outlined in the ICVCM’s Assessment Framework, which defines what “high quality” means in practice. The CCP label provides buyers with a simple, trustworthy way to identify credits with real climate impact.
Biochar Methodologies Approved
The ICVCM has given its CCP stamp to the following three biochar methods:
- CAR – U.S. and Canada Biochar (Version 1.0)
- Isometric Biochar Production and Storage (Version 1.0)
- Verra VM0044 Biochar Utilization in Soil and Non-Soil Applications (Version 1.2)
What is biochar?
Biochar is a carbon-rich material created by heating biomass—such as crop residues or wood—under low-oxygen conditions through a process called pyrolysis. This method locks carbon into a stable form, preventing it from decaying and releasing greenhouse gases.
When added to soil or used in other applications, biochar stores carbon for hundreds or even thousands of years. Beyond its climate benefits, biochar can improve soil health and crop yields.
Rising Market Demand
Biochar has become one of the fastest-growing sectors in the voluntary carbon market. According to MSCI, demand for biochar carbon credits has doubled every year for the past two years.
All three newly approved biochar methods are fresh to the market, with no credits issued yet.
- Under the Isometric methodology, 25 projects are registered, expected to produce 500,000 credits in 2026.
- For Verra’s VM0044, three projects are registered, forecasted to deliver 249,000 credits annually.
Annette Nazareth, Chair of the ICVCM, noted,
“Biochar is a rapidly growing segment of the carbon market and the approvals announced today underscore the credibility of this emerging climate solution. We look forward to seeing more projects developed under these newly approved methodologies, adding to the pool of high integrity credits that will soon be available to buyers.”

IFM Methodologies Approved
Improved Forest Management projects focus on better forestry practices that increase carbon storage and cut emissions. Strategies include:
- Extending harvest rotation periods
- Setting aside conservation zones
- Using reduced-impact logging techniques to limit forest and soil damage
Currently, IFM projects make up around 4% of the voluntary carbon market. The two IFM methods are:
- Verra VM0045 Improved Forest Management Using Dynamic Matched Baselines from National Forest Inventories (Version 1.2)
- ACR – IFM on Non-Federal U.S. Forestlands (Version 2.1), with specific leakage deduction requirements
Verra’s New Approach to Forest Carbon Accounting
Verra’s VM0045 is a new methodology that shifts from traditional, static models to dynamic baselines built on continuously updated national forest inventory data. This provides a more accurate and transparent measure of a project’s carbon impact.
No credits have yet been issued under VM0045, but two projects are in validation, with expectations to issue 258,000 credits annually.
Mandy Rambharos, CEO of Verra, said,
“The ICVCM’s approval of these methodologies is a defining milestone for nature-based solutions and the carbon markets, ensuring carbon credits deliver real, measurable, and lasting climate impact. Whether it’s transforming waste biomass into carbon-storing biochar or helping forests thrive through smarter management, these methodologies are about real-world action for real-world impact. This decision is a powerful endorsement of high-integrity climate solutions that not only reduce emissions but also bring tangible benefits to communities and ecosystems around the world.”
ACR’s IFM Methodology with Leakage Deductions
The ACR IFM on Non-Federal U.S. Forestlands (Version 2.1) includes rules to address leakage—the risk that reduced timber harvesting in one area causes increased harvesting elsewhere.
Projects that lower total wood product output compared to the baseline must apply a 10–20% leakage deduction, based on standard IFM practices. This ensures unintended emissions outside the project area do not offset climate benefits.
Version 2.1 has 18 listed projects covering nearly 500,000 acres, but no credits have been issued yet. The ICVCM is still reviewing Version 2.0, with a decision expected in September.
Conditional Approval: CAR Mexico Forest Protocol
The CAR Mexico Forest Protocol (Version 3) received provisional approval, contingent on two changes:
- Leakage Accounting Update – CAR must revise its leakage values to align with the latest research.
- Permanence Requirement – A minimum 40-year permanence commitment must be in place while tonne-year accounting is assessed in the context of common Mexican forestry practices.
The methodology has already issued 8.1 million credits, but it’s unclear how many will qualify for CCP labeling after these changes.

Why These Approvals Matter
The ICVCM’s endorsements send a strong signal to carbon credit buyers and developers. Projects certified under CCP-approved methodologies are seen as scientifically sound, environmentally robust, and market-ready.
For biochar, the approvals come at a time when demand is skyrocketing, positioning it as a credible long-term carbon removal tool. For IFM, the focus on accurate baselines and leakage control enhances trust in forest-based credits—an area that has sometimes been criticized for overestimating climate benefits.
These decisions also raise the bar for transparency and accountability in the voluntary carbon market, encouraging other methodologies to adopt stricter, evidence-based practices.
With the newly approved methods, developers can move forward with confidence, knowing their projects meet the highest integrity standards. Buyers, in turn, can purchase credits backed by rigorous science and verified climate benefits.
The post ICVCM Backs Verra’s Biochar and IFM Methods as High-Integrity Climate Solutions appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

