HSBC, Europe’s largest bank, has taken another step toward achieving its net zero goals. The bank set a new interim target to reduce emissions from its financed activities, aiming for net zero by 2050. That’s 20 years later than the bank’s first net zero goal. But is it making real progress—or just delaying action?
Banking on Change: HSBC’s Net Zero Shift
Originally, HSBC pledged in 2020 to achieve net-zero emissions in its operations by 2030. In its latest annual report, the bank said it was reducing emissions in its supply chain more slowly than expected.
- HSBC now expects only a 40% reduction in emissions by 2030, requiring heavy reliance on carbon offsets to bridge the gap.
HSBC said,
“As such, we have revisited our ambition, taking into account the latest best practice on carbon offsets. We are now focused on achieving net zero in our operations, travel, and supply chain by 2050.”
Also, HSBC will review its 2030 targets for emissions from its financing activities. Results from this review are expected later this year.

Challenges in Meeting Climate Goals
HSBC made its decision based on several factors it couldn’t control. These include new technology, demand for sustainable solutions, and policy changes. Julian Wentzel, HSBC’s new Chief Sustainability Officer, said the bank needed a “more measured approach.” This is because clients face real challenges when moving to lower-carbon operations.
The bank also highlighted that its original plan relied on the ability to use carbon credits to offset supply chain emissions. Recent guidance from the Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi) advised against using offsets. As a result, HSBC changed its strategy.
The European bank has dropped its plan to start a carbon credits trading desk. This decision reflects a larger trend. Many big companies are reducing their use of carbon offsets. Instead, they are concentrating on cutting emissions directly.
Companies like Google, Delta Air Lines, and EasyJet are rethinking their carbon credit use. They worry about the integrity of the credits they buy to compensate for their carbon pollution. Some offsets may be issued too much and don’t provide real climate benefits.
HSBC’s decision comes after Shell, which just revealed plans to sell most of its nature-based carbon projects. Other banks, including Bank of America, have also been cautious about engaging in the carbon market due to its lack of liquidity and declining participation.
Following the Leaders or Falling Behind?
HSBC has stepped back from carbon credit trading, but it still supports climate finance. The bank has launched several initiatives to support low-carbon technologies and businesses.
In July, HSBC launched the HSBC Infrastructure Finance (HIF) unit. This unit aims to finance and advise on infrastructure projects for the low-carbon transition. But just four months later, this unit stopped working. This showed the difficulties in managing large-scale climate finance programs.
HSBC has also invested in key climate technologies. The bank promised $1 billion last year. This money will boost progress in:
- Carbon dioxide removal
- EV charging
- Battery storage
- Sustainable agriculture
- Carbon capture solutions
HSBC has also invested $100 million in Bill Gates’ Breakthrough Energy Catalyst Fund. This fund backs green projects and helps scale climate innovations.
In another strategic move, HSBC partnered with Google Cloud to back companies developing climate-focused technologies. Through the Google Cloud Ready-Sustainability (GCR-Sustainability) program, HSBC provides financial support to businesses working on carbon reduction, supply chain sustainability, and ESG data management.
Climate Critics Push Back
HSBC’s move has sparked backlash from environmental groups. Reclaim Finance, a climate advocacy group, said the delay hurts the fight against climate change. Christophe Etienne from Reclaim Finance noted that:
“HSBC has opted to weaken its climate target rather than showing the ambition needed to drive the economy toward net zero.”
Joanna Warrington of Fossil Free London was even more direct. She remarked that HSBC is just putting its feet up and watching the world burn, rather than owning its responsibility for the climate crisis.

Critics also noted that HSBC has played a major role in financing fossil fuel projects over the years. The chart above shows that the bank is among the top 12 banks that financed fossil fuels globally.
Opponents say moving the net-zero deadline to 2050 goes against their earlier promise. This promise was to align their financial activities with the Paris Agreement’s goals.
The Bigger Banking Picture
The announcement comes amid a broader retreat from climate commitments by major banks. Many U.S. banks, like Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, and Bank of America, have lowered their emissions goals or left the UN-supported Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA). HSBC is still part of NZBA, but Elhedery did not promise to stay involved when asked by reporters.
Meanwhile, the Net-Zero Asset Owner Alliance mandates members to disclose financed emissions. These are GHG emissions attributed to financial institutions through their lending and investment activities.
In 2021, emissions peaked at 278 million tons but fell to 254 million tons by 2023, despite growing membership. This decline reflects shifts toward sustainable investments. By 2023, alliance members committed $555 billion to climate solutions, up $175 billion from 2022.

Key investment areas include bonds ($148 billion), real estate ($132 billion), equities ($99 billion), and infrastructure ($75 billion). Of 81 members with mid-term goals, 80 set climate investment targets, reinforcing the alliance’s push for net-zero progress through portfolio adjustments and sustainable financing.
Looking Ahead: Will HSBC Step Up or Step Back?
Despite the climate policy revision, HSBC reported strong financial results, with pre-tax profits rising 6.6% to $32.3 billion in 2024. The bank is cutting costs to save $1.5 billion by 2026.
HSBC maintains that it remains committed to net zero by 2050. However, its revised strategy raises questions about the role of banks in climate action. The institution claims that policy and market factors slow the transition. However, critics argue that financial leaders should lead the decarbonization effort, not just follow it.
With a review of its financed emissions targets set for later in the year, the banking sector will be watching closely to see whether HSBC introduces stronger policies—or continues to take a step back from its climate responsibilities.
The post HSBC Scales Back Net Zero Plans by 20 Years: A Climate Setback or Realistic Strategy? appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Climate Impact Partners Unveils High-Quality Carbon Credits from Sabah Rainforest in Malaysia
The voluntary carbon market is changing. Buyers are no longer focused only on large volumes of cheap credits. Instead, they want projects with strong science, long-term monitoring, and clear proof that carbon has truly been removed from the atmosphere. That shift is drawing more attention to high-integrity, nature-based projects.
One project now gaining that spotlight is the Sabah INFAPRO rainforest rehabilitation project in Malaysia. Climate Impact Partners announced that the project is now issuing verified carbon removal credits, opening access to one of the highest-quality nature-based removals currently available in the global market.
Restoring One of the World’s Richest Rainforest Ecosystems
The project is located in Sabah, Malaysia, on the island of Borneo. This region is home to tropical dipterocarp rainforest, one of the richest forest ecosystems on Earth. These forests store huge amounts of carbon and support extraordinary biodiversity. Some dipterocarp trees can grow up to 70 meters tall, creating habitat for orangutans, pygmy elephants, gibbons, sun bears, and the critically endangered Sumatran rhino.
However, the forest within the INFAPRO project area was not intact. In the 1980s, selective logging removed many of the most valuable tree species, especially large dipterocarps. That caused serious ecological damage. Once the key mother trees were gone, natural regeneration became much harder. Young seedlings also had to compete with dense vines and shrubs, which slowed the forest’s recovery.
To repair that damage, the INFAPRO project was launched in the Ulu-Segama forestry management unit in eastern Sabah.
- The project has restored more than 25,000 hectares of logged-over rainforest.
- It was developed by Face the Future in cooperation with Yayasan Sabah, while Climate Impact Partners has supported the project and helped bring its credits to market.
Why Sabah’s Carbon Removals are Attracting Attention
What makes Sabah INFAPRO different is not only the size of the restoration effort. It is also the way the project measured carbon gains.

Many forest carbon projects issue credits in annual vintages based on year-by-year growth estimates. Sabah INFAPRO followed a different path. It used a landscape-scale monitoring system and waited until the forest moved through its strongest natural growth period before issuing removal credits.
- This approach gives the credits more weight. Rather than relying mainly on short-term annual estimates, the project measured carbon sequestration over a longer period. That helps show that the forest delivered real, sustained, and measurable carbon removal.
The scientific backing is also unusually strong. Since 2007, the project has maintained nearly 400 permanent monitoring plots. These plots have allowed researchers, independent auditors, and technical specialists to observe the full growth cycle of dipterocarp forest recovery. The result is a large body of field data that supports carbon calculations and strengthens confidence in the credits.
In simple terms, buyers are not just being asked to trust a model. They are being shown years of direct forest monitoring across the project landscape.
Strong Ratings Support Market Confidence
Independent assessment has also lifted the project’s profile. BeZero awarded Sabah INFAPRO an A.pre overall rating and an AA score for permanence. That places the project among the highest-rated Improved Forest Management, or IFM, projects in the world.
The rating reflects several important strengths. First, the project has very low exposure to reversal risk. Second, it has a long and stable operating history. Third, its measured carbon gains align well with peer-reviewed ecological research and independent analysis.
These points matter in today’s market. Buyers have become more cautious after years of debate over the quality of some forest carbon credits. As a result, they now look more closely at durability, transparency, and third-party validation. Sabah INFAPRO’s rating helps answer those concerns and makes the project more attractive to companies looking for credible carbon removal.
The project is also registered with Verra’s Verified Carbon Standard under the name INFAPRO Rehabilitation of Logged-over Dipterocarp Forest in Sabah, Malaysia. That adds another level of market recognition and verification.
A Wider Model for Rainforest Recovery
Sabah INFAPRO also shows why high-quality nature-based projects are about more than carbon alone. The restoration effort supports broader ecological recovery in one of the world’s most important rainforest regions.
Climate Impact Partners said it has worked with project partners to restore degraded areas, run local training programs, carry out monthly forest patrols, and distribute seedlings to support rainforest recovery beyond the project boundary. These efforts help strengthen the wider landscape and expand the project’s environmental impact.
That broader value is becoming more important for buyers. Companies increasingly want projects that support biodiversity, ecosystem health, and local engagement, along with carbon removal. Sabah INFAPRO offers that mix, making it a stronger fit for the market’s shift toward higher-integrity credits.

The post Climate Impact Partners Unveils High-Quality Carbon Credits from Sabah Rainforest in Malaysia appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Bitcoin Falls as Energy Prices Rise: Why Crypto Is Now an Energy Market Story
Bitcoin’s recent drop below $70,000 reflects more than short-term market pressure. It signals a deeper shift. The world’s largest cryptocurrency is becoming increasingly tied to global energy markets.
For years, Bitcoin has moved mainly on investor sentiment, adoption trends, and regulation. Today, another force is shaping its direction: the cost of energy.
As oil prices rise and electricity markets tighten, Bitcoin is starting to behave less like a tech asset and more like an energy-dependent system. This shift is changing how investors, analysts, and policymakers understand crypto.
A Global Power Consumer: Inside Bitcoin’s Energy Use
Bitcoin depends on mining, a process that uses powerful computers to verify transactions. These machines run continuously and consume large amounts of electricity.
Data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration shows Bitcoin mining used between 67 and 240 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity in 2023, with a midpoint estimate of about 120 TWh.

Other estimates place consumption closer to 170 TWh per year in 2025. This accounts for roughly 0.5% of global electricity demand. Recently, as of February 2026, estimates see Bitcoin’s energy use reaching over 200 TWh per year.
That level of energy use is significant. Global electricity demand reached about 27,400 TWh in 2023. Bitcoin’s share may seem small, but it is comparable to the power use of mid-sized countries.
The network also requires steady power. Estimates suggest it draws around 10 gigawatts continuously, similar to several large power plants operating at full capacity. This constant demand makes energy costs central to Bitcoin’s economics.
When Oil Rises, Bitcoin Falls
Bitcoin mining is highly sensitive to electricity prices. Energy is the highest operating cost for miners. When power becomes more expensive, profit margins shrink.
Recent market movements show this link clearly. As oil prices rise and inflation concerns persist, energy costs have increased. At the same time, Bitcoin prices have weakened, falling below the $70,000 level.

This is not a coincidence. Studies show a direct relationship between Bitcoin prices, mining activity, and electricity use. When Bitcoin prices rise, more miners join the network, increasing energy demand. When energy costs rise, less efficient miners may shut down, reducing activity and adding selling pressure.
This creates a feedback loop between crypto and energy markets. Bitcoin is no longer driven only by demand and speculation. It is now influenced by the same forces that affect oil, gas, and power prices.
Cleaner Energy Use Is Growing, but Fossil Fuels Still Matter
Bitcoin’s environmental impact depends on its energy mix. This mix is improving, but it remains uneven.
A 2025 study from the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance found that 52.4% of Bitcoin mining now uses sustainable energy. This includes both renewable sources (42.6%) and nuclear power (9.8%). The share has risen significantly from about 37.6% in 2022.
Despite this progress, fossil fuels still account for a large portion of mining energy. Natural gas alone makes up about 38.2%, while coal continues to contribute a smaller share.

This reliance on fossil fuels keeps emissions high. Current estimates suggest Bitcoin produces more than 114 million tons of carbon dioxide each year. That puts it in line with emissions from some industrial sectors.
The shift toward cleaner energy is real, but it is not complete. The pace of change will play a key role in how Bitcoin fits into global climate goals.
Bitcoin’s Climate Debate Intensifies
Bitcoin’s growing energy demand has placed it at the center of ESG discussions. Its impact is often measured through three key areas:
- Total electricity use, which rivals that of entire countries.
- Carbon emissions are estimated at over 100 million tons of CO₂ annually.
- Energy intensity, with a single transaction using large amounts of power.

At the same time, the industry is evolving. Mining companies are adopting more efficient hardware and exploring new energy sources. Some operations use excess renewable power or capture waste energy, such as flare gas from oil fields.
These efforts show progress, but they do not fully address the concerns. The gap between Bitcoin’s energy use and its environmental impact remains a key issue for investors and regulators.
- MUST READ: Bitcoin Price Hits All-Time High Above $126K: ETFs, Market Drivers, and the Future of Digital Gold
Bitcoin Is Becoming Part of the Energy System
Bitcoin mining is now closely integrated with the broader energy system. Operators often choose locations based on access to cheap or excess electricity. This includes areas with strong renewable generation or underused energy resources.
This integration creates both opportunities and challenges. On one hand, mining can support energy systems by using power that might otherwise go to waste. It can also provide flexible demand that helps stabilize grids.
On the other hand, it can increase pressure on local electricity supplies and extend the use of fossil fuels if cleaner options are not available.
In the United States, Bitcoin mining could account for up to 2.3% of total electricity demand in certain scenarios. This highlights how quickly the sector is scaling and how closely it is tied to national energy systems.
Energy Markets Are Now Key to Bitcoin’s Future
Looking ahead, the connection between Bitcoin and energy is expected to grow stronger. The network’s computing power, or hash rate, continues to reach new highs, which typically leads to higher energy use.
Electricity will remain the main cost for miners. This means Bitcoin will continue to respond to changes in energy prices and supply conditions. At the same time, governments are starting to pay closer attention to crypto’s environmental impact, which could shape future regulations.

Some forecasts suggest Bitcoin’s energy use could rise sharply if adoption increases, potentially reaching up to 400 TWh in extreme scenarios. However, cleaner energy systems could reduce the carbon impact over time.
Bitcoin is no longer just a financial asset. It is also a large-scale energy consumer and a growing part of the global power system.
As a result, understanding Bitcoin now requires a broader view. Energy prices, electricity markets, and carbon trends are becoming just as important as market demand and investor sentiment.
The message is clear. As energy markets move, Bitcoin is likely to move with them.
The post Bitcoin Falls as Energy Prices Rise: Why Crypto Is Now an Energy Market Story appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
LEGO’s Virginia Factory Goes Big on Solar as Net-Zero Push Speeds Up
The post LEGO’s Virginia Factory Goes Big on Solar as Net-Zero Push Speeds Up appeared first on Carbon Credits.
-
Greenhouse Gases7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Renewable Energy2 years ago
GAF Energy Completes Construction of Second Manufacturing Facility








