Connect with us

Published

on

Mukhtar Babayev is the COP29 President and Special Representative of the President of Azerbaijan for Climate Issues.

Last year, the multilateralist’s task was challenging but clear. At the annual UN climate conference COP29 in Baku, we had to land a deal on the first-ever negotiated climate finance goal to support the developing world.

As international negotiations go, it was perhaps one of the most complex and contentious. We needed 198 countries to agree on something as sensitive as cold hard cash, all amidst global headwinds of wars, economic woes, and a wave of elections.

It was by no means easy, but we got there. We agreed the historic Baku Finance Goal to mobilise $300 billion a year by 2035, the largest ever commitment to come from a UN process. This goal set the benchmark for how we will support each other through the second decade after the Paris Agreement. It was not everything to everyone, and it was never going to be the mechanism to fund all climate action.

But as the COP29 Presidency, Azerbaijan pushed it to be as ambitious as possible. We knew that we needed it locked in place before delegates left Baku, or we may never have agreed anything.
The task for the multilateralist in 2025 is very different. Things never happen the same way twice.

UN, Germany say tackling climate crisis is path to economic and national security

Coalition of the willing

At the Petersberg Climate Dialogue in Berlin, the first major climate ministerial meeting since Baku, attendees were clear in their recognition of both the challenges facing the multilateral system and their desire to protect it. The question for all of us follows: how do committed climate actors make this happen? What tangible steps must the coalition of the willing take in 2025 to preserve and reinforce the best and only system of international cooperation on climate change?

First of all, we need to back Brazil. As the incoming Presidency, they will host us in Belem and we need to follow their leadership. They have presented their vision of “mutirão”, whereby a community comes together to work on a shared task. They have set out priorities for the negotiations on important topics.

This includes ensuring a just transition for communities that leaves no one behind, measuring how we adapt to the impacts of a warming world, and coming together to discuss how we best implement the First Global Stocktake, the report card agreed two years ago in Dubai. Successful outcomes to these negotiations will be critical indicators that the world is still willing and able to find common ground.

Brazil’s COP30 president: Climate summits must move from words to real action

But this year the multilateral system is about more than everyone coming out of a room with an agreed piece of paper. The Brazilian Presidency is giving us crystal clear direction that the measure of the health of international efforts to address the climate crisis is implementation.

One by one, we all need to step up and make sure that our own actions match our words. Following the first calendar year of average temperatures 1.5C above pre-industrial times, this is more urgent than obsessing about new words.

Concern about climate investment

So, let’s start with some of the words we agreed in Baku. In Berlin, we heard both developed and developing countries say that we need to deliver on the Baku Finance Goal, and hold ourselves to account for the promises that we have made.

However, amidst competing global priorities, there is already clear anxiety about the direction of travel on climate investment. The Baku Finance Goal was a collective commitment, and everyone must make sure it is delivered. We need countries to recognise the concern of frontline communities and set out clear plans for contributing their fair share to the $300 billion target by 2035. For any country that wants to preserve and reinforce the multilateral process, this is an essential place to start.

UK aid budget cuts threaten climate finance pledge to vulnerable nations, experts warn

Next, we need to turn to words first set down ten years ago in Paris. Central to that seminal agreement was the need for each country to determine its own contribution to climate action in a bottom-up approach. The sum of these national plans was intended to reach the ultimate goals of a safe and resilient world. The next generation of these plans, known as “Nationally Determined Contributions” (NDC), are now due.

Everyone now has a responsibility to reach for the highest possible ambition and offer the best of themselves. Each NDC matters. Every dollar counts. This year, the future of the multilateral process to address the climate crisis will depend on how individual countries answer this call to action.

The post How to reinforce the multilateral climate system in 2025: Step up, one by one appeared first on Climate Home News.

How to reinforce the multilateral climate system in 2025: Step up, one by one

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Iowa Moves to Shield Farmers, Ethanol Plants, From Lawsuits Over Emissions

Published

on

Climate lawsuits are a largely nonexistent threat to farmers in the state, but ethanol producers could benefit from the law.

DES MOINES, Iowa—Aaron Lehman has many concerns about the fate of Iowa’s farmers. Climate lawsuits aren’t one.

Iowa Moves to Shield Farmers, Ethanol Plants, From Lawsuits Over Emissions

Continue Reading

Climate Change

IEA slashes pre-war oil demand forecast by nearly a billion barrels per day

Published

on

Global oil demand is expected to be almost one billion barrels per day less than was forecast before the Iran war, as shortages and soaring costs prompt drastic cutbacks by consumers and businesses, a report by the International Energy Agency (IEA) said on Wednesday.

With the closure of the Strait of Hormuz choking off supplies and keeping prices high, less oil is being used to make products such as jet fuel, LPG cooking gas and petrochemicals, the Paris-based IEA said in its monthly oil report, forecasting the biggest quarterly demand drop since the COVID pandemic.

The Iran war “upends our global outlook”, the government-backed agency said, adding that it now expects oil demand to shrink by 80,000 barrels per day in 2026 from last year.

Before the conflict began, the IEA said in February it expected oil demand to rise by 850,000 barrels per day this year, meaning the difference between the pre-war and current estimates is 930,000 barrels a day, or 340 million barrels a year.

That could have a significant impact on the outlook for planet-heating carbon emissions this year.

At an intensity of 434 kg of carbon dioxide per barrel of oil – the estimate used by the US Environmental Protection Agency – the annual reduction in carbon dioxide emissions from oil for 2026, compared with the pre-war forecast, is similar to the amount emitted by the Philippines each year.

Harry Benham, senior advisor at Carbon Tracker, told Climate Home News that he expects at least half of the reduction in oil demand to be permanent because of efficiency gains, behavioural change and faster electrification.

The oil shock is leading to oil being replaced, especially in transport, with electricity and other fuels, just as past oil shocks drove lasting reductions in consumption, he said. “The shock doesn’t delay the transition – it reinforces it,” he added.

Demand takes a hit

While demand for oil has fallen significantly, supplies have fallen even further. Supply in March was 10 million barrels a day less than February, the IEA said, calling it the “largest disruption in history”.

This forecast relies on the assumption that regular deliveries of oil and gas from the Middle East will resume by the middle of the year, the IEA said, although the prospects for this “remain unclear at this stage”.

    Last month, US Energy Secretary Chris Wright told the CERAWeek oil industry conference that prices were not high enough to lead to permanent reductions in demand for oil, known as demand destruction.

    But the IEA said on Wednesday that “demand destruction will spread as scarcity and higher prices persist”.

    Industries contributing to weaker demand for oil include Asian petrochemical producers, who are cutting production as oil supplies dry up, the report said, while consumers are cutting back on liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), which is mainly used as a cooking gas in developing countries, the IEA said.

    Flight cancellations caused by the war have dampened demand for oil-based jet fuel, the IEA said. As well as cancellations caused by risk from the conflict itself, airports have warned that fuel shortages could lead to disruption.

    Across the world, governments, businesses and consumers have sought to reduce their oil use after the war. The government of Pakistan has cut the speed limit on its roads, so that people drive at a more fuel-efficient speed, and Laos has encouraged people to work from home to preserve scarce petrol and diesel.

    Nepal’s EV revolution pays off as oil crisis causes pain at the pumps

    Consumers in Bangladesh are seeking electric vehicles (EVs) to avoid fuel queues and, in Nigeria, more people are seeking to replace petrol and diesel generators with solar panels, Climate Home News has reported.

    In the longer term, the European Union is considering cutting taxes on electricity to help it replace fossil fuels and France is promoting EVs and heat pumps.

    IEA urged to help “future-proof” economies

    Meanwhile, the IEA came under fire last week from energy security experts, including former military chiefs, who signed an open letter in which they accused the agency of offering “only a temporary response to turbulent markets”, calling for stronger structural action “to future-proof our economies”.

    They said that besides releasing emergency oil stocks and offering advice on how to reduce oil demand in the short term, the IEA should show countries how to reduce their exposure to volatile oil and gas markets.

    The IEA has also been under pressure from the Trump administration to talk less about the transition away from fossil fuels.

    The post IEA slashes pre-war oil demand forecast by nearly a billion barrels per day appeared first on Climate Home News.

    https://www.climatechangenews.com/2026/04/15/iea-slashes-pre-war-oil-demand-forecast-by-nearly-a-billion-barrels-per-day/

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    California’s Climate Leaders Talk Clean Energy Growing Pains and the War on Iran

    Published

    on

    Virtual power plants see a renewed push in the legislature to weather the state’s “mid-transition.”

    SACRAMENTO—Not long into Ellie Cohen’s opening remarks at the California Climate Policy Summit this week, the crowd erupted in boos—at her request.

    California’s Climate Leaders Talk Clean Energy Growing Pains and the War on Iran

    Continue Reading

    Trending

    Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com