Connect with us

Published

on

Nargiz Mukhtarova is a women’s rights activist and researcher in Azerbaijan.

Azerbaijan is often referred to as a typical example of a rentier state. This model of governance with a political economy reliant on fossil fuel exports has not only created grave climate and social justice issues, but it also offers a shadowy prospect for the country’s sustainable development.

Moreover, the abundance of natural resources has enabled reprisals against those who speak out about the grim future to come. My husband, Farid Mehralizada, is one of those who faced such a consequence – and this happened just a few months before COP29. 

On an ordinary morning, on May 30 this year, Farid gave me a gentle hug, followed by a spark of excitement about our baby to come in a few months. Rushing to leave home for work, little did he know that he would not return anytime soon and be with me on the day of birth.  

In a warring world, Azerbaijan’s COP29 truce appeal draws fire as “PR exercise”

That morning, a few plainclothed men forcibly detained Farid in the streets of central Baku, placed a bag on his head, and pushed him into a car for a ride full of threats. Farid was interrogated for two days before he was sent to trial over an accusation of smuggling in connection to a broader and politically motivated criminal case against critical media. Although the charges were not supported by firm or credible evidence, the court handed him a pretrial detention. Farid is now facing 12 years in jail with additional spurious charges introduced against him. 

Farid is a renowned economist who has rigorously advocated for social justice and climate-friendly policies. Alongside his job as an economic analyst for Radio Free Liberty, he regularly provided analysis to the Baku Research Institute and commentaries to independent media of the country, even as restrictions on free speech have significantly increased over the past years.

Known for his critical analysis of Azerbaijan’s dependence on oil and gas, he highlighted the nation’s economic vulnerabilities – exacerbated by unresponsive governance – while advocating for climate action and sustainable practices.  

“Chronic” reliance on fossil fuels

“One of the little discussed issues is climate change,” Farid stated in an interview with Voice of America, emphasising that while climate issues are often talked about in future terms, they are already a pressing reality.

Unlike many policymakers who present climate change as a distant concern, Farid argued that its effects are already visible and have significant consequences for both the environment and society. He pointed to rising droughts, which threaten agriculture and reduce productivity, leading to the threats of increased poverty and food scarcity.  

Farid deemed Azerbaijan’s dependence on hydrocarbons as a “chronic problem” that discourages diversificationa necessity for ensuring the welfare of Azerbaijani citizens, and for fostering a green economy. In 2022, Farid pointed out that 92 out of every 100 dollars earned through foreign trade came from the oil and gas industry, warning that such extreme dependence was both unsustainable and dangerous for Azerbaijan’s economic future. 

Azerbaijan pursues clean energy to export more ‘god-given’ gas to Europe

A significant aspect of Farid’s critique revolved around water resource management. In a country facing drought, Azerbaijan’s outdated irrigation systems lead to the wastage of one-third of its water resources – a statistic he found alarming 

He argued that this inefficiency reflects a broader failure to address basic infrastructure needs critical for climate resilience. Without modernising these systems, he warned, Azerbaijan would face severe water shortages, jeopardising agricultural productivity and increasing vulnerability to climate change. 

Not an isolated case

Farid believed that investments in sectors such as technology, agriculture and renewable energy would foster a more resilient economy less reliant on fluctuating oil markets. By promoting such solutions, he implicitly challenged the government’s focus on oil and gas revenue as the backbone of its economy.  

In doing so, he may have been perceived as undermining established power structures, as his economic solutions indirectly threatened the status quo. Farid’s arrest, in this context, seems to reflect the government’s discomfort with his calls for reform and diversification. 

In Nagorno-Karabakh, Azerbaijan’s net zero vision clashes with legacy of war

Farid’s case is not an isolated one. Over the past year, a number of journalists, researchers and human rights defenders have faced repercussions for their critical work. Several independent media outlets and NGOs have been targeted with arrests in an ongoing crackdown, including Abzas Media, with which Farid was accused of collaborating.  

Yet, what happened to Farid is reflective of risks faced by all activists and experts advocating for climate justice and social welfare in Azerbaijan. As his case demonstrates, the fight for climate justice and transparency often intersects with broader political struggles, underscoring the need for systemic change in both environmental policy and governance. Thus, COP29 attendees should recognise these struggles – and extend their solidarity with those who have become victims. 

The post How Azerbaijan locked up climate and social justice advocate ahead of COP29  appeared first on Climate Home News.

How Azerbaijan locked up climate and social justice advocate ahead of COP29 

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Broken debt system must be fixed to confront future climate shocks

Published

on

Mae Buenaventura is the manager of the debt justice programme of the Asian Peoples’ Movement on Debt and Development, a regional alliance of peoples’ movements, community organizations, coalitions, NGOs and networks

A potentially historic shift in public debt governance is set to unfold in Washington DC this week as Global South governments take a collective stand to stop a “silent killer” of development financing.

The first-ever UN-hosted borrowers’ forum will officially be launched on April 15 on the sidelines of the 2026 Spring Meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. Led by five convening countries – Zambia, Egypt, Nepal, the Maldives and Pakistan – the initiative is one of the key wins of last year’s 4th Financing for Development Conference (FFD4) in Sevilla, Spain.

The forum’s mandate is to establish a platform for borrower countries, supported by a UN secretariat, “to discuss technical issues, share information and experiences in addressing debt challenges, increase access to technical assistance and capacity-building in debt management, coordinate approaches and strengthen borrower countries’ voices in the global debt architecture”.

Instead of facing lenders alone, these countries will now use a UN-backed platform to share technical expertise and coordinate their approach to a global debt system that is fundamentally broken.

Debt grips climate-vulnerable nations

The human cost of the current debt architecture is staggering. According to the UN trade and development agency, UNCTAD, more than 40% of the global population – roughly 3.4 billion people – live in countries where the government is forced to spend more on debt payments than on the health, education and social protection of its citizens.

In so-called low-income countries, governments spend an average of 7.5% of their total budgets on debt service, with interest payments consuming up to 20% of total government revenue in these regions.

The Philippines is a case study in this financial stranglehold. It is part of a global majority forced to watch its public services crumble and infrastructure lag while its wealth is siphoned off to satisfy foreign lenders.

The policy of automatic appropriations – a legacy of the rule of late former President Ferdinand Marcos Sr. – mandates that debt servicing takes precedence over any other public expenditure, effectively placing the demands of lenders above the needs of the Filipino people. Even as it faces a $1.5 trillion regional financing gap to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030, its hands remain tied by a legal framework that values credit ratings over human lives.

    As a “middle-income country” (MIC), the Philippines is stuck in a frustrating purgatory. It is often deemed “too wealthy” for the G20’s debt-relief framework, yet too poor to absorb global economic shocks. Last year, Finance Undersecretary Joven Balbosa hit the nail on the head when he called for support that goes “beyond the simplistic income categorization” that ignores a country’s actual vulnerabilities.

    Without an inclusive and equitable global debt architecture, nations including the Philippines are left to navigate catastrophic climate risks and economic shocks with zero fiscal breathing space.

    No respite during climate disasters

    The regional evidence of this systemic failure is everywhere. Take Pakistan, which in 2022 was hit by catastrophic flooding that submerged a third of the country and caused billions in losses. Despite this climate-driven disaster, World Bank data shows that Pakistan made payments in 2023 of $11.8 billion for public and publicly guaranteed (PPG) external debt, while its PPG external debt reached $93 billion that same year, surpassing pre-pandemic debt of $87 billion (2020).

    Sri Lanka followed IMF prescriptions throughout 16 lending programs since 1991, only to become the first Asian country this century to default. Its MIC status prevents application for debt relief and restructuring measures. Today, the Sri Lankan people bear the brunt of harsh conditionalities, including raising VAT from 8% to 15%, slashing food and fuel subsidies, and the erosion of hard-earned worker pensions.

    Residents sit in a Rescue 1122 boat as they evacuate from the flooded area, following monsoon rains and rising water levels of the Chenab River, in Qasim Bela village on the outskirts of Multan in Punjab province, Pakistan, September 11, 2025. REUTERS/Quratulain Asim

    Residents sit in a Rescue 1122 boat as they evacuate from the flooded area, following monsoon rains and rising water levels of the Chenab River, in Qasim Bela village on the outskirts of Multan in Punjab province, Pakistan, September 11, 2025. REUTERS/Quratulain Asim

    Currently, the global rules of lending and borrowing are set by a “creditors’ club” composed of the IMF, the World Bank and the Global Sovereign Debt Roundtable it set up, and the Paris Club.

    These institutions measure “debt sustainability” through a narrow lens of a country’s capacity to make timely repayments. They largely ignore internal economic inequalities, gender disparities and the existential threat of climate change.

    Crises should trigger debt service cancellation

    By organising the new borrowers’ forum, the Global South is signalling that the era of passive “standard-setting” by lenders is over.

    The ultimate goal for global civil society and debt justice movements is the establishment of a UN Debt Convention; a democratic, binding and inclusive framework that governs both lenders and borrowers. This mechanism would ensure that debt restructuring and cancellation are sufficient to allow countries to fulfill their international human rights obligations and implement necessary climate actions.

    Green Climate Fund picks locations for five developing country hubs

    To be truly transformative, debt sustainability analyses must align with human rights and sustainable development needs. This means conducting impact assessments – both before and after loans are issued – to identify “illegitimate” debts that do not benefit the public.

    Crucially, we need an automatic debt service cancellation mechanism that triggers during extreme climatic, environmental or health shocks. We also need a binding global debt registry to ensure that every loan is transparent and subject to public scrutiny.

    Whether the borrowers’ forum becomes a true milestone depends on its courage to challenge the status quo. We can no longer allow debt to act as a “silent killer” of our future. It is time to demand a financial system that serves humanity, not just the balance sheets of the powerful.

    The post Broken debt system must be fixed to confront future climate shocks appeared first on Climate Home News.

    Broken debt system must be fixed to confront future climate shocks

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    Join Greenpeace to save Scott Reef from Woodside’s dirty gas

    Published

    on

    Greenpeace and allies will be protesting outside Woodside’s Annual General Meeting to show the WA and federal governments strong community opposition to Woodside’s proposal to drill for gas at Scott Reef.

    What: Protest outside Woodside Energy’s Annual General Meeting

    When: 8am Thursday 23rd April 2026Where: Kagoshima Park (on the corner of Great Eastern Highway and Bolton Avenue)

    What’s at stake

    Scott Reef is a pristine ocean ecosystem off the north-west coast of Australia.

    It is home to endangered and endemic species, including pygmy blue whales and the dusky sea snake, and a nesting ground for green sea turtles. Scott Reef is a place of extraordinary natural beauty, and a vital marine environment that supports a wide range of marine life.

    What Woodside is proposing

    Dirty fossil fuel corporation, Woodside Energy, is seeking approval to drill more than 50 gas wells underneath and around Scott Reef as part of its Browse project.

    The gas would be extracted and transported to the Burrup Hub, the most polluting fossil fuel project in Australia. This proposal would industrialise the doorstep of Australia’s largest freestanding oceanic reef system – threatening the marine life that relies on it and the climate.

    Why this can’t go ahead

    The WA Environmental Protection Authority has already identified the risks of this project as “unacceptable”, issuing a preliminary rejection.

    Serious concerns include:

    • The risk of an oil spill
    • Impacts on pygmy blue whales
    • Damage to green sea turtle nesting grounds

    These risks are severe, and potentially irreversible. But the decision hasn’t been made yet. The project is still being assessed.

    The Federal Environment Minister is approaching a decision that will determine whether Scott Reef is protected – or vulnerable to decades of industrial gas destruction.

    This is a defining moment.

    Make opposition visible

    Across Australia, people are speaking out to protect Scott Reef and oppose Woodside’s Browse project.

    Showing that opposition is visible, coordinated and growing helps increase pressure on decision-makers ahead of this critical decision.

    Join the protest

    A protest outside Woodside’s AGM is a key public moment to demonstrate opposition and help protect Scott Reef.

    Kagoshima Park (on the corner of Great Eastern Highway and Bolton Avenue)
    🕗 8am, Thursday 23rd April 2026

    Join the protest and help show how many people support protecting Scott Reef before the government makes its decision.

    Join Greenpeace to save Scott Reef from Woodside’s dirty gas

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    Norway Reopens Annual Whale Hunt Despite Pressure to End Commercial Whaling

    Published

    on

    As demand for whale meat declines at home, Norway exports it to Japan, markets it to tourists and sells it online as dog food.

    Norway reopened its annual whale hunting season earlier this month, continuing a practice most countries abandoned decades ago.

    Norway Reopens Annual Whale Hunt Despite Pressure to End Commercial Whaling

    Continue Reading

    Trending

    Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com