Good news for the electric vehicle (EV) industry- General Motors (GM) and Lithium Americas have inked a $625 million joint venture to develop the Thacker Pass lithium project in Nevada. This partnership is another power play to boost the U.S. domestic supply chain for EV batteries and reduce reliance on lithium imports, particularly from China.
The Background: Lithium Americas Secured $2.3B DOE Loan to Drive Thacker Pass Development
In March 2024, Lithium Americas secured a $2.3 billion loan from the U.S. DOE through its Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM) Loan Program. This funding will support the development of the Thacker Pass lithium project in Nevada.
However, before Lithium Americas can access the loan, they must contribute $195 million, which will be used to cover expenses for construction and ramping up production. Additionally, General Motors (GM) will also provide a line of credit to help fund these requirements.
General Motor’s Key Investment in 2023
Back in January 2023, General Motors made a substantial investment in Lithium Americas, agreeing to provide $650 million. This was divided into two parts: the first $320 million was delivered immediately and used to advance the first phase of Thacker Pass.
But the second part of the investment, or Tranche 2, encountered some changes. Both companies decided to revise the terms due to a company reorganization. Tranche 2 was supposed to be completed by the end of 2023.
On August 30, 2024, Lithium Americas and GM extended the deadline for Tranche 2 of their investment agreement to explore better options for GM’s additional investment. They ended the original agreement when they signed a new joint venture deal. This new deal was announced on October 16.
Unlocking the Latest JV
The latest press release mentions that General Motors has agreed to invest $625 million in cash and letters of credit for a 38% stake in the Thacker Pass project. Lithium Americas, which will manage the project, retains a 62% interest and will contribute $387 million to the joint venture. The funds will be used to develop the first stage of the project, which might cost around $2.9 billion.
Jonathan Evans, President and CEO of Lithium Americas
“Our relationship with GM has been significantly strengthened with this joint venture as we continue to pursue a mutual goal to develop a robust domestic lithium supply chain by advancing the development of Thacker Pass. Today’s joint venture announcement is a win-win for GM and Lithium Americas. GM’s JV Investment demonstrates their continued support and helps us to unlock the previously announced $2.3 billion DOE Loan. We will be working closely with GM to advance towards the final investment decision, which we are targeting by the end of the year.”
Domestic Lithium Supply to Support GM’s EV Ambitions
One of the highlights of the joint venture is GM’s expanded offtake agreement. It extends for up to 100% of lithium production from Thacker Pass’ first stage for 20 years. This agreement will help GM ensure a steady supply of lithium for its future EV batteries.
GM also secured the right to acquire up to 38% of production from the project’s second stage, with the ability to negotiate first offers for any remaining volumes.
The company’s investment in Thacker Pass is driven by the need to secure a long-term supply of lithium as the company continues to scale up its EV production.
According to Jeff Morrison, SVP, of Global Purchasing and Supply Chain of General Motors remarked,
“We’re pleased with the significant progress Lithium Americas is making to help GM achieve our goal to develop a resilient EV material supply chain. Sourcing critical EV raw materials, like lithium, from suppliers in the U.S., is expected to help us manage battery cell costs, deliver value to our customers and investors, and create jobs.”

GM’s Net Zero Pathway
The Michigian-based EV maker aims to achieve carbon neutrality in their global products and operations by 2040.

Source: GM
As described in GM’s sustainability report, significant progress made to reduce Scope 3 emissions include:
- Battery production and expansion through Ultium Cells LLC- JV with LG Energy Solution, which is manufacturing cells for its Ultium Platform.
- Collaborating with Tesla to integrate the North American Charging Standard (NACS) for their EVs. It will start in 2025.
- Investing in home, workplace, and public charging infrastructure in the U.S. and Canada.
- Investing in hydrogen fuel cell technology to reduce the carbon emissions of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles.
- Addressing the barriers to EV ownership in the United States through dealership education and engagement.
Lithium Prices and Market Challenges
While the deal is progressing the lithium market is also fluctuating simultaneously.
MINING.COM reported that prices of battery-grade lithium hydroxide have experienced a sharp decline, falling to $9,800 per ton in October 2024 from $22,275 a year earlier. This marked a significant drop from the peak prices which were around $85,000 per ton in late 2022.
Despite these market challenges, Lithium Americas continues to advance the project, positioning itself to benefit from a projected long-term demand increase for lithium as the EV market expands. The company’s shares saw a 20.2% rise after the JV announcement. This showed investor confidence in the project’s potential.
Thacker Pass: The Gateway to North American Lithium Battery Supply Chain for EVs
The Thacker Pass project is well underway, with approximately 40% of the engineering design already completed. Major site preparations are progressing, with earthworks for the process plant excavation nearing completion and preparations for concrete placement underway.
Located in northern Nevada’s Humboldt County, Thacker Pass is home to the largest known lithium deposit in North America. 385 million tonnes of measured and indicated resources, equivalent to six million tonnes of lithium carbonate. The mine is expected to produce enough lithium to power one million electric vehicles annually, a critical contribution to the growing U.S. EV market.
Source: Lithium Americas
Lithium Americas is focused on getting the project ready for final investment decisions by the end of the year.
- The project’s first phase targets a production capacity of 40,000 tonnes of lithium carbonate per year, with significant progress anticipated in the next few years.
What’s Next for Thacker Pass?
The next steps for the joint venture include finalizing engineering designs and procurement contracts as well as securing the final investment decision by the end of 2024. GM’s involvement in the project will help Lithium Americas unlock the DOE’s loan. Subsequently, this will provide the necessary financial support to fully develop the project.
As part of the agreement, GM and Lithium Americas are working closely with Bechtel, the project’s engineering, procurement, and construction management contractor. It can create around 1,800 direct jobs during its three-year construction period.
In the coming months, the Thacker Pass project will focus on de-risking and advancing construction to ensure it meets its targets for lithium production. Once operational, the mine will significant role in securing a domestic supply of lithium. Consequently, supporting the growing demand for EVs and pushing the U.S. clean energy transition.
Key Implications in the future:
- Thacker Pass could provide lithium for up to 800,000 EVs annually, reducing U.S. reliance on foreign suppliers.
- It supports the U.S. goal of net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, aligned with President Biden’s climate goals.
- A domestic lithium supply chain would lower carbon emissions, transport costs, and supply chain risks for U.S. car manufacturers.
- Sustainably sourced battery materials would help produce electric vehicles with a smaller carbon footprint.
Notably, Lithium Americas is also in a strong position to meet the growing demand for EV batteries. It will continue to secure additional funding to fuel its motive. However, at this moment, partnering with GM will significantly impact the domestic lithium market and in a good way.
Source: Lithium Americas News Release and General Motors Sustainability Report
SEE MORE: The Fastest Developing North American Lithium Junior
The post General Motors Invests $625M in Lithium Americas to Boost Nevada’s Thacker Pass Lithium Project appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

