Rich nations agreed to channel at least $300 billion a year by 2035 for developing countries to ramp up climate action under a new finance goal adopted at the COP29 climate summit, after bad-tempered talks in which vulnerable countries pushed for a bigger slice of the pie.
The new goal, which kicks in after 2025, replaces the existing annual target of $100bn, which was met two years late in 2022 and is widely seen as insufficient to meet rocketing needs among poorer nations to shift to clean energy and adapt to extreme weather and rising seas.
The $300bn goal – with developed countries “taking the lead” in providing money and mobilising private-sector investment – will be at the core of a wider effort to scale up financing to at least $1.3 trillion per year by 2035 “from all public and private sources”.
UN climate chief Simon Stiell described the new finance goal as “an insurance policy for humanity, amid worsening climate impacts hitting every country”.
“This deal will keep the clean energy boom growing and protect billions of lives,” he said, warning that “like any insurance policy – it only works – if the premiums are paid in full, and on time.”
In the closing plenary of the two-week summit, some developing nations, including Cuba and India, expressed dissatisfaction with the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG), criticising its “paltry size” and the weight given to funding from multilateral development banks. They said it does not respond to their requirements to grow sustainably and keep their people safe.
“The goal is too little. Too distant,” Chandni Raina, an adviser with India’s Ministry of Finance told the closing plenary. “The proposed goal shall not solve anything for us.”
Tina Stege, climate envoy for the Marshall Islands, said her Pacific island state was leaving “with a small portion of the funding climate-vulnerable countries urgently need”. “It isn’t nearly enough, but it’s a start, and we’ve made it clear that these funds must come with fewer obstacles so they reach those who need them most,” she added.
“Tale of delivery”
But EU climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra told the plenary that COP29 would be remembered “as a start of a new era for climate finance”, saying the EU believes “it is ambitious, it is needed, it is realistic and it is achievable. We are confident this will be a tale of delivery,” he added.
The agreement came after a day of drama as the COP29 talks in Baku ran overtime, with groups of the poorest nations and small island states staging a temporary walkout, raising fears that a deal would not be reached at the so-called “Finance COP”.
COP29 Bulletin Day 12: Carbon market rules adopted after walkout delays finance talks
Those vulnerable groups wanted to ensure they would get fixed amounts under the new goal, arguing they are hit hardest by the impacts of global warming and have the least resources to protect their people and go green. In the end, they compromised, settling for a process that will explore options to “design and implement” allocation floors for them.
Baku to Belem Roadmap
That effort will be part of a “Baku to Belem Roadmap to $1.3 trillion” that will look for “additional resources” to drive low-carbon, climate-resilient development and support the rollout of developed-country plans for cutting emissions and adapting to climate change.
This roadmap, which will be developed over the coming year leading up to the COP30 conference in Belem, Brazil, was put forward by the African Group, Barbados, Colombia, Honduras and Panama in Baku this week.
Details remain sketchy but Colombia’s environment minister Susana Muhamad referred to “innovative possibilities that our countries have been working on”. A taskforce co-led by France, Kenya and Barbados, for example, has been considering how to introduce levies on shipping, aviation, fossil fuels and financial transactions.
Win for China, Gulf states
The final COP29 deal on the new finance goal was a compromise between efforts by rich countries to limit the amount of additional government finance they will have to stump up – with many citing fiscal constraints – and the growing gap between funding and needs in climate-stressed parts of the world.
Developing countries rejected a strong push by wealthy governments to include their richer, more polluting members, especially China and Gulf nations, in the official donor base. The text only “encourages” developing countries to make contributions to the new finance goal “on a voluntary basis”.
Namibia uses COP29 climate summit to push for oil and gas investments
As the talks in Baku got dangerously close to ending without an agreement, the Azerbaijan presidency came in for sharp criticism for putting a proposed figure for the government-led core of the finance goal on the table too late.
It eventually did so on Friday, which should have been the final day of the two-week talks, with an initial suggestion of $250 billion a year provoking disappointment and anger from developing countries, who argued they were being forced to sacrifice their people.
Compromises
In the end, they settled for not much more in return for commitments to avoid worsening already high debt levels and easing access to funding, including from the UN’s dedicated climate funds. The text promises to pursue efforts to at least triple annual outflows from those funds from 2022 levels by 2030, rather than earmarking a percentage of the goal for them, as earlier proposed.
Developing countries also capitulated on demands for sub-goals to channel more money to under-funded work on adaptation, as well as repairing growing loss and damage from droughts, floods, storms and rising oceans. These sub-goals were left out of the agreed text.
Climate justice activists slammed the new goal for being far too low and failing to set a target that would prioritise grants over loans.
Champa Patel, executive director of governments and policy with the Climate Group, said $300bn a year “doesn’t even come close to the transformational finance needed to tackle the climate crisis”.
Don’t mention fossil fuels
As drama unfolded over finance, countries also adopted at COP29 a weakened decision on cutting carbon emissions, which failed to explicitly mention last year’s pledge to transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems. A second text on mitigation was postponed to mid-2025, after it was also weakened by opposition from Saudi Arabia.
The adopted Mitigation Work Programme, a non-binding process meant to enhance climate mitigation, was adopted at the closing plenary. The adopted version fails to mention last year’s landmark decision to reduce reliance on fossil fuels, which it did include in earlier versions.
A second text meant to be the main outcome on cutting emissions in Baku did not reach consensus, after also getting weakened. The “UAE Dialogue” follows up on last year’s review of climate policies known as the Global Stocktake (GST) – the main decision from last year’s COP in Dubai.
The last version of the UAE Dialogue referenced “paragraph 28” of the UAE consensus, where the fossil fuel transition was included, but the text falls short of explicitly mentioning the landmark pledge to reduce fossil fuels.
Instead, the latest draft reaffirmed the role of “transitional fuels” also mentioned in last year’s GST, which experts interpreted to mean fossil gas among other technologies.
Saudi Arabia successfully blocked any fossil fuel language at COP29, after their negotiators said at a plenary session on Thursday that they would “not accept any text that targets any specific sectors including fossil fuel”. The Saudi government has also blocked this in other major environmental summits, among them the biodiversity COP16 and the G20.
In the last draft, the COP29 presidency also removed two proposals to expand energy storage capacity to 1,500 gigawatts by 2030 and to add 25 million km of power grids by 2030. Both would have been new targets building on the decision to triple renewable energy capacity by the same date.
At the closing plenary, several country groups expressed their disappointment with the text and said they could not accept it in its current form.
“We are concerned to see attempts to backtrack the agreements made last year,” said Chilean lead negotiator Julio Cordano. “The text does not enjoy consensus”.
“We made historic commitments a year ago, including to transition away from fossil fuels. We came here to translate that commitment into meaningful action, and quite simply, we have fallen short,” said a delegate from Canada.
In the end, COP president Mukhtar Babayev opted to defer the text until next year, when countries will review the process again in mid-year talks in Bonn. A final decision is expected at COP30.
The UAE Dialogue was one of the key agreements meant to inform the upcoming round of new nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Most of them will now have to make progress without an explicit mandate from the COP.
As COP29 came to a close, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres said in a statement that he “had hoped for a more ambitious outcome – on both finance and mitigation – to meet the great challenge we face. But this agreement provides a base on which to build,” he added.
(Reporting and editing by Megan Rowling, Joe Lo and Sebastian Rodriguez)
The post Fractious COP29 lands $300bn climate finance goal, dashing hopes of the poorest appeared first on Climate Home News.
Fractious COP29 lands $300bn climate finance goal, dashing hopes of the poorest
After witnessing the effects of sea-level rise in the low-lying island nation of Tuvalu, Pacific leaders on Tuesday used the pre-COP31 summit in Fiji to voice their frustration at the difficulties they have experienced in tapping the global climate finance system.
A small group of government leaders, climate negotiators and heads of development banks and climate funds took a trip to Tuvalu’s Funafuti atoll on Tuesday morning, travelling by road over land just 10-20 metres wide to visit a project that is building barriers to keep the sea from the land.
They then flew to Fiji for the pre-COP summit, where several Pacific leaders said they had been let down by the insufficient quantity, bad terms and slow speed of international finance to help them adapt to a warming climate that is bringing higher oceans, drought and more powerful storms to their shores.
“Right now, our islands are like a canoe that has been rammed by a massive foreign ship. Our canoe is taking on water, we are sinking, and what is the world’s response?” asked Palau’s President Surangel Whipps Jr.
“They hand us a tiny patch to cover a gaping hole,” he continued, “but the bureaucratic process just to receive that patch is so slow that the water fills the hole while we wait. Then to rebuild the vessel so that we can survive the next storm, we are offered loans, debt that adds weight to a sinking boat packaged in red tape so thick we can barely access it. And while we wait, the water continues to fill.”
Pacific leaders and Australia called again on governments to invest in the new Pacific Resilience Facility (PRF), which has been designed by the Pacific Islands Forum and is seeking $500 million in investments by COP31 in November.
It has around $180 million so far, but did not receive additional pledges during the UN General Assembly in New York. The PRF aims to invest to generate annual returns which it can give to projects like water tanks for drought-hit communities.
Witnessing sea level rise
The annual pre-COP gathering is usually a low-profile technical meeting of climate negotiators. But this year, Australia – which is the president of negotiations at COP31 – partnered with the Pacific to introduce a “leaders segment” in an attempt to shine a spotlight on climate issues affecting the region.
Fourteen government leaders – from Australia, Timor-Leste, Mauritius and the Pacific – made the trip. They were joined by the European Union’s climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra, the heads of the Green Climate Fund and the Asian Development Bank and former Australian prime minister Julia Gillard.
On their return to Fiji, Solomon Islands Prime Minister Matthew Wale told the pre-COP leaders roundtable that the sea level rise they had witnessed was personal for him.
“Tuvalu was not just a site visit for me. I saw the story of my own saltwater people,” he said, adding that he, his daughter and his grandfather had lost their houses to sea level rise and that three-quarters of his electorate live on land that will be underwater in the next 30 years.
From the other side of the world, Antigua and Barbuda’s environment minister Michael Joseph said Tuvalu’s problems felt similar to those of his own Caribbean islands. “I saw vulnerable communities… just metres from the sea and people determined to remain on their land, preserve their culture and way of life,” he said.
A group of Fijian schoolchildren told the leaders it was not just sea level rise the Pacific struggles with but also heatwaves, droughts and storms, which worry their families and prevent them from learning.
Climate finance red-tape
Several Pacific leaders criticised the world’s leaders for not doing enough to combat climate change. Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown expressed disappointment that only two non-Pacific leaders had come to the pre-COP, a fact Australian media widely picked up on to label the event a flop and question its A$20 million (US$14m) price tag.
“We’ve heard a lot of numbers these last two days,” Brown said. “Let me share one of my own. More than 50 invitations extended to world leaders… to see for themselves what high emissions are doing to our nations and our ocean – an ocean that covers nearly one-third of the Earth’s surface.”
-
Pacific islands seek backing for new regional fund ahead of COP31
Pacific leaders will appeal for pledges to a new regional fund designed to swiftly channel climate finance to local communities -
The Pacific made history in the courts – now we must do it in the negotiations
Legal clarity alone will not lead to reduced emissions, more finance or stronger national climate plans – political will is key to meeting states’ obligations -
Civil servants warn fossil fuel exploration could harm New Zealand’s climate reputation
Advice to politicians says revoking a ban on oil and gas drilling could damage relations with Pacific neighbours and risk lawsuits
He called for more climate finance for the Pacific, asking “if the world is prepared to assess our suitability for climate finance, why is it not equally prepared to scrutinise whether those responsible for delivering it are meeting their obligations?”
Like Palau’s president Whipps, Naoero’s President David Adeang criticised the red tape that is hindering access to climate finance as well as a lack of money, complaining especially about “complicated procedures, heavy reporting, delays in approval and disbursement”.
Adeang added that “the way we assess vulnerability matters”, adding that it should be measured by more than income. Naoero, for example, is classified by the World Bank as high-income, restricting which climate finance it is eligible for.
Action plan to improve access
On Thursday, the Australian government will present a statement and action plan on improving access to climate finance for small island developing states and least developed countries, which it is asking other countries and organisations to endorse.
The statement addresses some of these Pacific complaints as well as acknowledging that progress has already been made on simplifying access by multilateral development banks and climate funds.
In Fiji, Asian Development Bank head Masato Kanda said his institution is “tailoring our finance and operations to island realities” because “your children and their children should be able to grow old in the countries their ancestors have called home for millennia”.
The executive director of the Green Climate Fund (GCF), Mafalda Duarte, said that the GCF-backed coastal adaptation project leaders visited in Tuvalu shows that “climate finance works” although – as the project took eight years to implement – “it takes time, and therefore we have no time to waste”.
Australia calls for optimism
While Pacific leaders expressed concern that the world is set to blast past its agreed 1.5C warming limit, endangering their nations, Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese called for “optimism”. “If people think there is no hope, then they will not strive to get the change that we need,” he said.
He said that when he attended his first COP in 2005, Australia’s renewable energy target was 2%. Its target is now 82% renewable electricity by 2030.
While Albanese promoted Australia’s success at electrifying homes and businesses and rolling out renewables, he has been criticised by climate campaigners for extending the production of fossil fuels, including coal – largely for export.
France’s Minister for Ecological Transition Monique Barbut defended the European Union’s climate action at the pre-COP meeting. She said the continent was heating up and reducing emissions faster and providing more climate finance than anywhere else in the world.
“It is time for all major emitters to step up and do their fair share” on climate finance, she said. Most developing countries with large emissions have fiercely resisted joining the club of climate finance donors, arguing they have played a disproportionately small historic role in causing climate change.
Barbut, as well as Palau’s president Whipps, called for the next flagship scientific assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to be finished by COP33 in 2028, in time to inform the next global stocktake of national climate action.
This timeline has been opposed by countries like India, Saudi Arabia and China, who argue it would put an unfair burden on developing countries. Barbut said countries should “support the work of the IPCC rather than sabotage its calendar”.
Barbut said that governments should agree at COP31 to aim to raise the share of “clean electricity” in final energy consumption to 35% by 2035. The Turkish and Australian governments have pushed for this goal although without specifying that the electricity should be “clean”. Barbut added that COP31 should also agree to cut emissions of methane, a particularly potent greenhouse gas.
The post Pacific leaders rail at climate finance failures after pre-COP trip to Tuvalu appeared first on Climate Home News.
Pacific leaders rail at climate finance failures after pre-COP trip to Tuvalu
Jacynta Fa’amau is a Pacific campaigner at global grassroots climate movement 350.org and a secretariat member of Pacific Climate Warriors.
The first thing that struck me was the sheer size of Queensland’s Saraji coal mine. Standing at the edge of the enormous pit, my brain scrambled for words as I scanned the earth’s open wound – a whole island could probably fit inside it.
Looking down, I noticed footprints of an emu and a koala, pressed and dried in what was once a puddle – signs of how drought had driven animals in desperate search of water, so dangerously close to the coal trucks and heavy machinery ahead.
Earlier this year, I joined a small group of Pacific Islanders on a journey through the Bowen Basin to learn from First Nations communities battling Australia’s mammoth coal industry. Of the more than 40 coal mines operating in the area, BHP & Mitsubishi Alliance’s Saraji mine is one of the largest. So it came as a painful shock to us when in August, the Australian government approved the mine’s extension just months after our visit.
-
As COP31 co-host, Australia should make its polluters pay for climate damage
With UN climate funds running short on cash, now is the time to start taxing the companies whose emissions are driving harm in the Pacific and other vulnerable parts of the world -
At pre-COP, UN climate chief warns of heat threat to mothers and babies
The spotlight on maternal health came on the first day of the pre-COP31 meeting in Fiji, where Pacific concerns are set to top the agenda as ministers gather for talks
Witnessing coal extraction is devastating. It is bad enough to see what pillaging tonnes of coal can do to a mine’s immediate surroundings: dry creek beds, dwindling wildlife, denuded land. But to know that this coal will be shipped across the ocean, bring air pollution, and eventually lead to the destruction of Pacific islands thousands of miles away is another kind of heartbreak.
Rising ocean waters
I’m an Australian-born Samoan. In 2002, I visited my family home for the first time. My father took me to the rural community where generations of my family were raised. He did not have the words to describe how much has changed since rising ocean waters had taken away almost a third of the beach.
I learned of how we had to relocate my great‑great‑grandparents’ grave to higher ground twice in the last 15 years. Of how my cousins have to paddle out further to sea to catch fish, since warmer waters have destroyed much of the reef. Of how the ocean crashes so close to my uncle’s home that he had to build a new house further away.
We saw reflections of our own climate destruction in the Pacific when we shared these stories with our First Nations relatives at the edge of the Saraji mine. Murrawah Johnson and Teila Watson, both Birri Gubba and Gangulu women, made clear connections between their struggles and ours. “We don’t get to inherit our land and we don’t get to inherit our traditional roles. We are fighting a war on extinction,” Murrawah said.
Coal extraction devastated their lands and cultures – totems have disappeared, fresh water has become scarce – while the effects of using it have devastated ours. “King tide, cyclones, all the violence that has been enacted on your country and people is because of the violence that has been allowed here, to us and our country,” Teila said.
Wearing the mantle of climate leadership
This week, Australia is assuming the mantle of climate leadership as co-president and head of negotiations of this year’s UN Climate Change Conference, COP31. It will lead on deliberating the summit’s priorities as world leaders and climate negotiators descend on Fiji and Tuvalu for the pre-COP meetings.
Ironically, just days before the pre-COP bega