Connect with us

Published

on

Author, speaker, and activist Eileen Flanagan

Episode 93: What is Your Climate Change Role?

In this month’s episode of Citizens’ Climate Radio, Eileen Flanagan, a writer, social change teacher, Quaker, and activist, dives deep with host Peterson Toscano into four different roles people have traditionally taken in change movements. In addition, Erica Valdez and Horace Mo join Peterson for a vibrant discussion about their personal experiences in taking one of these roles. 

Finding Your Role 

In Eileen Flanagan’s words, the four recurring roles in change movements include rebels, advocates, organizers, and helpers. One of the best ways to understand these four roles is through their different orientations. Eileen says, “The helpers’ orientation is: what can I do to improve things without messing with the system?” She mentions climate change helpers who take the initiative to help insulate houses or help put solar panels on a neighbor’s roof. A helper also prepares food for events, provides rides for volunteer lobbyists, and donates money to a climate organization.  

Elieen further explains, “An advocate takes the role of trying to use the tools of the system to change things.” Advocates often capitalize on lobbying and lawsuits to convince elected officials and people in power to make decisions. 

In contrast, Eileen points out, 

Rebels use disruptive tactics. They don’t do letter writing; they don’t do lobbying. Instead, they protest of various kinds. In my tradition, we usually use nonviolent direct action, targeting a decision maker, maybe a corporation, and trying to get them to change a policy through consistent troublemaking. 

Lastly, she shares, “Organizers are the trickiest because they can use different tactics. But what makes someone an organizer is they are oriented toward their group, toward their community.” She says, “The focus of the organizer is what will our group do.” She then talks about the Montgomery Bus Boycott, when Rosa Parks not only played the rebel role but was also an organizer. 

Livehouse With Peterson, Horace, and Erica: 

If you are unsure which role best suits you, listen to the conversation between Peterson, Horace, and Erica. They reflect on their experiences playing change movement roles in their community. Erica shares her experience working as an organizer on and off campus at her university. Her role has helped her realize the significance of team effort and mutual trust. 

Horace speaks about volunteering to help a local, sustainable food organization hand out free vegan burgers to football attendants near a stadium. Being a helper opened him up to new ideas and further inspired him to continue such work.

Good News Story

Horace Mo in Chongqing shares a good news story about China’s new carbon trading regulations.

For China to regulate its National Emissions Trading System is a big step. Horace shares some of the details. The Chinese carbon trading regulation will go into effect starting May 1, 2024. Learn more about China’s ETS from the International Carbon Action Partnership

If you have a good news story to share, email radio @ citizensclimateradio.org or leave a message at our visiting voicemail line: (619) 512-9646‬

Nerd Corner

Citizens’ Climate’s Research Coordinator, Dana Nuccitelli, discusses the very geeky world of permitting reform. Dana highlights climate research (and makes it understandable) for fellow nerds and the nerd curious! Visit The Nerd Corner to see the Chart of the Week, regular posts, and an active forum to connect with other nerds. 

Take a Meaningful Next Step

Each month, we will suggest meaningful, achievable, and measurable next steps for you to consider. We recognize that action is an antidote to despair. If you need help with what you can do, consider one of the following next steps.

Since the episode covered the topics of our role in the climate movement, you can take one of these online quizzes to learn more about yourself and your place in the world. 

1.  Podcast Engagement

  • We would love to hear your thoughts and personal experiences of taking one of the change movement roles! You are welcome to email us at radio @ citizensclimatelobby.org, or even join and chat with us on the show! You can also leave a voice mail (619) 512-9646‬.
  • Please share our show on your social media and with your friends. If you listen on Apple Podcasts or Spotify, we would LOVE a review.

2. Read More About Eileen Flanagan

  • If you ever want to learn more about the four roles discussed by Eileen Flanagan, you can visit her website, ElieenFlanagan.com, to learn about her published books, online lessons, and informative writings. 

3. Carbon Fee and Dividend Movement (For College Students)

  • Explore the Carbon Fee and Dividend movement, which advocates for effective climate policies. They creatively engage college students, faculty, and staff in their campaigns. This movement also facilitates direct connections with lawmakers
  • Utilize the hashtag #carbonfeeanddividend on social media.
  • Learn more at CFDmovement.com and follow them on Instagram @carbonfeeanddividend.

4. Citizens’ Climate Lobby National Youth Action Team (For Middle and High School Students)

5. Additional Climate Action Resource (For anyone at any time)

  • For those seeking more ways to take action and potentially find one of their change movement roles, you can explore the action page at CCLusa.org/action.

Listen Now!

Listener Survey:

We want to hear your feedback about this episode. After you listen, feel free to fill in this short survey. Your feedback will help us make new decisions about the content, guests, and style of the show. You can fill it out anonymously and answer whichever questions you like. You can also reach us by email: radio@citizensclimatelobby.org 

You can hear Citizens’ Climate Radio on

Also, feel free to connect with other listeners, suggest program ideas, and respond to programs on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, or TikTok

Read the Transcript
Episode 93: What is Your Climate Change Role?

SPEAKERS

Peterson Toscano, Horace Mo, Eileen Flanagan, Erica Valdez, Dana Nuccitelli

Peterson Toscano  00:00

Hi there, and welcome to Citizens’ Climate Radio. This is your climate change podcast. In this show, we highlight people’s stories, we celebrate your successes, and together, we share strategies for discussing climate change. I’m your host, Peterson Toscano. Hey there. Welcome to Episode 93 of Citizens’ Climate Radio project of Citizens’ Climate Education. This episode is airing on Friday, March 22, 2024. 

Today, we’re going to consider the four roles changemakers traditionally take Are you an advocate, a helper, an organizer, or perhaps a rebel? Maybe you take on different roles in your work to address the causes and the impacts of climate change. Eileen Flanagan, a Quaker author, speaker and climate change, mover and shaker will explain the four rules for us. Then you’re going to hear a lively conversation I had with two of my team members. 

Peterson Toscano  01:00

Dana Nuccitelli gets super nerdy with us in the nerd corner. He’s geeking out over permitting reform. It’s also known as permitting modernization. Horace Mo joins us from Changqing, China, with good news about his country’s first carbon trading regulations. But first, I want to introduce you to our newest Citizens’ Climate Radio team member, Erica Valdez.

Erica Valdez  01:31

Have you ever heard of the Inland Empire? To other locals, this valley is a sweet spot of Southern California where you can spend time at the beach, the mountains, and the desert all in one day. To me the Inland Empire is the region I call home. Hi, everyone. My name is Eric about this. I’m a senior at Northern Arizona University majoring in environmental sustainability and minoring in Spanish and community engagement. Growing up in this beautiful part of California. I spent most of my childhood outdoors, whether at the beach, on camping trips, or on the streets in my neighborhood, staying connected to my surrounding environment became a habit. 

Erica Valdez  02:04

As I got older and some of my time outdoors was replaced by the news, I noticed everyone talking about climate change. Anchors use buzzwords like increasing temperatures and rising sea levels. They encouraged us to do our part by taking shorter showers and separating our recyclables. Looking back these concerns and recommendations were going in one ear and out the other not just for me, but for those around me. It wasn’t until I did some research and took a climate science class in high school that I realized how big of a problem this really was. My confusion quickly turned to curiosity and passion. 

Erica Valdez  02:38

Now, I study the environment in Flagstaff, Arizona, which is unlike the usual desert landscape that comes to mind. Instead, picture a small college town in the snowy mountains of Arizona. Here I’m grateful to have the Coconino National Forest in my backyard. While at school, I explore the surrounding land. I also enjoy relaxing in a hammock on campus. Oh, and I recently started bouldering, but I can’t say I’m the best at it. I also take advantage of living in the first Dark Sky City in the United States. Did you know that Flagstaff has very low light pollution? This means that the night sky is not polluted with any artificial light, and it makes for excellent stargazing. 

Erica Valdez  03:13

Here in northern Arizona, I’m able to recognize the importance of our environment just as I did as a kid in California, only things are a little different. Now, as I’ve watched shifts in our climate become more intense feelings of climate, Doom and anxiety have grown within me. I don’t know about you, but talking and even just thinking about climate change can exhaust me, but I refuse to let it overwhelm me. Because of these feelings. I just to learn how I can make an impact. I decided to pursue a degree in environmental sustainability. 

Erica Valdez  03:39

I’m committed to supporting others in this global conversation to communicate climate change in a way that encourages, not creates, fear or guilt. I want to ensure that future generations have the opportunity to connect with their environment as I did, and I’m very excited to do this through my work with Citizens’ Climate Radio.

Peterson Toscano  04:12

Thank you, Erica, and welcome aboard. In a moment, Erica Valdez will join Horace Mo and me for a spirited conversation about our roles in the climate movement. 

Peterson Toscano  04:25

None of us discovers our roles right away. And our roles do grow, change, and develop over time. So what about you? What’s your role on our rapidly changing planet? In 2017, we featured Eileen Flanagan it was for Episode Nine of this podcast. As the board chair of Earth Quaker Action Team or EQAT, Eileen led a successful effort to stop one of the largest banks in the United States from financing mountaintop removal coal mining leader. As the equate campaign director I, Eileen played a pivotal role in launching a global campaign against Vanguard. This is the largest investor in fossil fuels worldwide. Her dedication and leadership have made a significant impact on the fight against climate change. 

Peterson Toscano  05:14

So, I asked Eileen about the steps we can take to move the public and lawmakers to action. She answered, what do you know about the four roles most commonly taken on by changemakers? I was like that there are four of them. Lucky for you, Eileen will break them down for us. After I leave, one again explains the four roles. Erica Valdez, a college student studying change movements, will chat with me about the organizer role. This one is the hardest to explain. Erica goes into more detail for us and provides some very inspiring examples. Horace Mo will then jump into the conversation to tell us about the role that currently best suits him. Eileen told me about Bill Moyer. No, not the PBS personality. This Bill Moyer was an engineer who dove deep into social change movements. He then spent much of his life leading trainings around nonviolent direct action. He also identified and taught successful strategies for bringing about social change. Eileen shared with me some of Moyers’s teachings about the roles we might take when seeking to change the world around us. 

Eileen Flanagan  06:32

He found that four roles showed up over and over again. The names we’ve given them are helper, advocate, organizer, and rebel. They show up in all kinds of ways. And the way to think of it is really what is their orientation. 

Eileen Flanagan  06:49

So a helper’s orientation is, what can I do to make things better without messing with the system? So if you’re concerned about climate change, a helper might insulate their home, put solar panels on, maybe do that in their congregation, and try to live a low-carbon footprint life. That sort of thing would be attractive to someone who’s naturally a helper. 

Eileen Flanagan  07:12

An advocate takes the role of trying to use the tools of the system to change things. So lobbying, using lawsuits, trying to convince elected officials and people in power to make decisions, essentially using the tools of the system. 

Eileen Flanagan  07:30

In contrast, a rebel uses disruptive tactics, they don’t do letter writing, they don’t do lobbying. Instead, they do protests of various kinds. In my tradition, we usually use nonviolent direct action, targeting a decision maker, maybe a corporation, and trying to get them to change a policy through consistent troublemaking. The fourth role is called the organizer. 

Eileen Flanagan  07:54

And in some ways, the organizer is the trickiest because they can use different kinds of tactics. But the thing that makes someone an organizer is they are oriented toward their group toward their community. So, for example, someone who says, Let’s get our congregation together and see what we can do together about climate change. That’s a very organizer way of thinking about it. And the group might decide to insulate the church, or they might decide to go lobby together or they might take up a rebel tactic. The focus of the organizer is what will our group do? So this shows up again and again in different kinds of social change. 

Eileen Flanagan  08:36

If you think about the Montgomery Bus Boycott, Rosa Parks was the rebel who got arrested for refusing to move on the bus. But there would have been a big thing if it hadn’t been for the woman who stayed up all night mimeograph thing, leaflets saying, let’s all both boycott the buses on Monday. She played the organizer role and got people out; the advocate role was played by the NAACP, which filed a lawsuit against the Montgomery bus system. And then helpers were the people who drove people; the ordinary citizens of Montgomery and the African American community walked to work for over a year in order to put pressure on the bus company; they wouldn’t have been able to do that without the helpers who came and gave people rides and things like that. 

Eileen Flanagan  09:21

One thing I found really helpful about the four roles is to realize that organizations play a niche, but then each organization needs, in some way, people who have these different strengths. So even though my group we have helpers, and they’re the people who bring cookies to the meeting, boy, are we glad that they’re part of us, right? If we do civil disobedience, we need people who are thinking about taking care of people and things like that. So there’s an individual level two, finding out what are your gifts and proclivities that you can bring to the movement. Organizations are most effective when they pick one. An organization that tries to play all four roles is likely less effective because they’re jumping around too much. 

Peterson Toscano  10:05

I love this conversation that Eileen Flanagan has started for us. And I think a lot about these roles. The rebel role is the one that some people think is the most obvious. I think it’s the hardest. There is one role, though, that I have a lot of questions about. And that’s the organizer’s role. I understand it, and I want to understand it better. So, to help me with that is our newest team member, Erica Valdez. Hey, Erica, how are you?

Erica Valdez  10:34

I’m good. Peterson,

Peterson Toscano  10:36

welcome to the show your very first time on Citizens’ Climate Radio.

Erica Valdez  10:40

Yes, I’m very excited to be here.

Peterson Toscano  10:41

So you’ve done some research for your studies. And you’ve looked at this organizer role, what can you share with me and with the listener to help us better understand this particular role?

Erica Valdez  10:54

Before I started my studies, I had no idea that the organizer role existed, and it was just very hard to digest. First, I want to point out that in the world of organizing, we constantly refer to this process called the cycle of organizing. To touch on some of the points that Eileen makes, we do look inward onto the group or into the group, we always start by connecting with the people. This could be those in the community, those in the group, or those just involved in our mission; we start by building relationships in order to identify the issues. And once we connect with these people involved, we can plan on how to support and sustain the group and build collective power. And then, organizers and their groups carry out the action; organizers use similar tactics to the other four roles that we talked about. But throughout this whole cycle, it’s very important to reflect and evaluate so we don’t lose sight of the group vision.

Peterson Toscano  11:46

The thing that I appreciate most about and understand the most about the organizer model is that the organizer is not a leader in a traditional hierarchical sense, but more like a facilitator. Am I getting that right?

11:59

Exactly. You’re right on point. Organizers use relational and collaborative spaces. They don’t just lead all alone; the extra tried to avoid one person leading and doing all the work because this could lead to potential burnout. I always ask people, have you ever had a group project and just taken the initiative to do all the work yourself? Yeah, it’s it’s very tiring. And I get over the work so fast. And this is what organizers try to avoid. Instead, they look for and identify the leaders. Yeah, they rarely lead the group alone.

Peterson Toscano  12:32

Can you give us any examples of like people in history that have done this kind of work?

Erica Valdez  12:39

There are so many examples throughout history that I could talk for days about, but one that stands out to me is Ella Baker. She’s a well known activist and grassroots organizer of the US United States Civil Rights Movement in the 50s and 60s. She advocated similarly to Luther King and Malcolm X, but she never prioritized being the face of the movement. Instead, she introduces this term called spadework, and in this context, refers to a spade as a gardening tool. It does a lot of the detail work to create these large, beautiful gardens, and she uses spadework to describe the behind-the-scenes, the nitty gritty work that keeps the momentum of the action, and often, this work is not seen or recognized. And through this, she prioritized building relationships and identifying the leaders in the movement so that it would outlast her. It was a really long-lasting movement. And she didn’t leave the group alone.

Peterson Toscano  13:36

It’s amazing. You mentioned Ella Baker because I just saw a movie, a biopic, that had her as one of the main characters. Really? Yeah, it’s this new movie on Netflix called Rustin, about Bayard Rustin, who was another organizer that many people never heard of because, like Ella Baker, he stayed behind the scenes. He also stayed behind the scenes, not just because he was an organizer, but because he was openly gay. At a time when that was really hard to be in it would have tanked the movement. So he stayed in the shadows in a way he organized the March on Washington, where Dr. King gave his famous speech, but he didn’t do it himself. He had a whole team of many young people that he helped to build that leadership to identify the leadership, just like you say. So, if anyone wants to see this in action, this movie Ruston is great because you see Ella Baker identifying Rustin as someone who needs to step up because he’s got great skills. And then you see him doing it, and it’s lovely to see it in action. And now that you explained all this, I’m like, oh, yeah, those organizers and organizer roles?

Yeah, those characteristics are the most admirable of the organizer role, and you can see it in so many people throughout history. 

Peterson Toscano  14:51

What about you in the work that you’ve done so far? What roles have you taken, and which ones fit you best?

Erica Valdez  15:00

Before studying community organizing, I, again had no idea that these roles existed and that like we could distinguish characteristics between them. After I started studying it, I realized that in my roles on campus and off campus, I realized I wasn’t putting these things into practice when leading these groups or just being involved in these groups, and those around me are often facing a lot of burnout, or initiatives stop moving forward, which is very, very common. If we’re not putting these things into practice, as an organizer now, and I consider myself a community organizer, I’ve learned the importance of building relationships and identifying leaders, evaluating the whole time. What am I doing wrong? What’s working? How can I support my group better? And this has made all the difference in the groups that I’m involved in.

Peterson Toscano  15:48

I want to bring another voice into this conversation from a completely other country and timezone. And for you listening. We’re recording this well in the United States early in the morning. What time is it by you there, Erica? Right now?

Erica Valdez  16:02

It’s aout 8am.

Peterson Toscano  16:04

It’s about 10 am here in Pennsylvania. Joining us from China, where it’s about midnight, I think, or later, is our very own Horace Mo. Hey, Horace. Hey, Peterson. Hey, I hear it’s an auspicious day over there.

Horace Mo  16:22

Yes, it is. Just for our listeners, you might hear firecrackers or fireworks going off right now. So my window actually, it’s the Chinese New Year, so I can really help with that everybody’s in a very joyful vibes. Yeah, let’s get to the topic. I really agree with what Eric has said about her experience as an organizer. And I think her sharings actually deepen my understanding of the work of being an organizer, even though I’ve never had that kind of experience before. It is really amazing work that organizers like you are doing for social good. I identify. myself as a helper, and for our audience to know the definition of her helper is given by Eileen is what I can do to make things better. This idea strikes me the most; it indicates doable action at an individual level. Whenever I can offer support, or whatever that is needed by other people, it almost always brings me a fulfilling feeling that I am valued, and it is touching to see people smiling back at me or when I offer whatever help that they actually are in need. And I enjoy this kind of interaction with people around me.

Peterson Toscano  17:40

I feel very much that I’m a helper to I definitely not an organizer for you, or is where have you been a helper? And how have you shown yourself to be a helper?

Horace Mo  17:53

When I was announced grad at the University of Michigan, I actually volunteered for a local sustainable food organization. One idea was simple. The organization needed people to help them hand out free vegan burgers, which were so delicious. By the way, I once had three burgers for the organization just for breakfast. They tried to give away free vegan burgers to promote their brand. But the most important thing is to get people interested in vegan burgers, which are great alternatives to meat-based burgers. For our listeners. Gosh, if you’re listening to this, and you have not tried a vegan-based burger before, I strongly suggest you try out a vegan burger, which tastes almost exactly the same as meat-based burgers; they set up a booth by the football stadium, one of those college football game days. And I just helped them hand out those free vegan burgers to the fans who are going to the tailgate parties. It’s a simple task, I am confident that most people are able to handle burgers.

18:59

It’s super difficult to remember how important these little tasks are. And they can just sometimes get muddled and forgotten in the big picture. Not everyone needs to be an Ella Baker in order to make a difference. It’s these little tasks that everyone is able to do that make a very big difference in whatever mission we’re trying to accomplish. 

Peterson Toscano  19:19

Yeah, and so often food is part of it, right preparing sandwiches or giving them out? The thing that I have found that I’m so pleased with is that I’m an introvert, so I’m super shy around people, which a lot of people don’t think about because, you know, I’m very engaged on the radio. I really struggle unless I have a role, and once I have a role, and it might be handing out vegan burgers or teaching or something, I feel much more confident and able to move within society because I’ve got a specific role to do. ,

Horace Mo  19:52

Yeah absolutely. I also consider myself an introvert I am now that type of person who can speak a lot or Just speak loudly in front of the public or in front of a lot of strangers. Handing out vegan based burgers is such a, just a cost surmise task for me to do, because they just feel relieved, but also value at the same time that I can contribute to a community work that I enjoy doing.

Peterson Toscano  20:19

I don’t know Erica, I’m starting to get a little suspicious that horse is working for “big vegan.”

Erica Valdez  20:26

It’s advocating for him.

Horace Mo  20:28

I mean, I’m not gonna lie, I just got to be frankie. That kind of opened the door for me. You know, when I was a helper for that organization, I also became a learner; I learned about the nutrients of those vegan-based burgers and what is the process of making those burgers. What are the gradients of those burgers? And what’s the difference between those vegan-based burgers, meat-based burgers, and especially the impact on our environment and the welfare of the animal so freakin based burgers, I guess, measured before? They’re so good. You have to try this. We haven’t? ,

Peterson Toscano  21:04

Yeah you keep pushing this? Yeah, I know. I don’t know, every time you get like a quarter every time you pay $1? Every time you see that, I wonder. But you know, as you’re saying this, like you went in to do this as a helper. And then you learn something. And I imagine you also got to know some people. And that’s the other thing that I think it’s important. When we’re looking to change the world, or change a law or change a system, we may not always be successful. In fact, often we’re not, we may have limited success at first, and it takes time. But other changes happen, changes with relationships, and people get to know each other, and you and your network, and you find out about other groups, and you learn other things. And that’s part of the change movement as well, not just the win, or the lose, but the building of the community.

Erica Valdez  21:51

Yeah, and that’s why I love the relational aspect of all of these roles. It creates a community that even if you try and fail, you’re trying and failing together, and it might spark a new initiative, it might, again, help us network in order to just get new ideas and bounce off of each other and create collaborative spaces. And that’s, that’s what I love about this work.

Peterson Toscano  22:12

Or is other than pushing vegan burgers, or is there anything else you want to add?

Horace Mo  22:16

I have to give a disclaimer: I did not get paid for selling or promoting vegan-based burgers. Yeah, I definitely echo what you said about being an organizer. People like you also need helpers like me, and we helpers also look up to you. We just might need that kind of person who can who can gather people together and come up with a blog to plan that we can work on something together. Each row that is played by either a helper or an organizer is equally important, together that will foster a very reciprocal relationship, which will definitely help people struggle for the same go, you know, proper and efficient way.

Peterson Toscano  22:59

So for you listening, what about you? Are you a helper, an advocate and organizer, or rebel? Are you part of an organization that may be an advocate organization, but within it, you’re not an advocate; you’re a helper or an organizer? We really would love to hear what you have to say. Feel free to send us an email radio at citizensclimate.org, and we’ll get back to you. if you want, you could actually be on the air to share some of your ideas. That email address again is radio at citizens. climate.org Erica aurus thank you so much for being on the show today and for helping so much with the production of Citizens’ Climate Radio. 

Horace Mo  23:43

Thank you, Peterson.

Erica Valdez  23:45

Yeah, thank you super happy to be here.

Peterson Toscano  23:48

This episode of Citizens’ Climate Radio has been brought to you by Horace’s Vegan Burgers.

Horace Mo  23:57

I appreciate it.

Peterson Toscano  24:00

That was Horace Mo and Erica Valdez, members of the Citizens’ Climate Radio team. You also heard Quaker, author, speaker, and climate activist Eileen Flanagan. To learn more about islands books and online workshops, visit Eileen flanagan.com. In our show notes, I have links to other resources. I’ve even included online quizzes you can take to better understand yourself and the roles you play in society. Visit CCL usa.org/radio. That’s CCL usa.org/radio. Now it is time for the nerd corner.

Dana Nuccitelli  24:44

Hi, I’m Dana Nuccitelli. CCL research coordinator, and this is the nerd corner. I’m here to highlight some interesting new climate research for the nerds out there and to make it understandable for the nerd curious. In this episode, we consider the question What exactly is permitting reform? And why is it so important? 

Dana Nuccitelli  25:04

A permit is how a local state or federal government gives the go ahead to start a new construction project. During the permitting process, the government makes sure that the construction and operation of the project won’t unduly harm workers, the local community or the environment. That’s an important process. But permitting adds time and expense to projects of all kinds. So it’s important to strike the right balance. 

Dana Nuccitelli  25:27

We want the permitting process to be thorough but not take so long that it delays that critical clean energy transition. Right now, the permitting process is taking so long that if we don’t make it more efficient, we won’t be able to meet our national climate commitments. electrical transmission lines are particularly important because they’re needed to connect more cheap and clean solar and wind energy to the electrical grid. But new transmission lines currently take about a decade to permit and build, which is just too slow. 

Dana Nuccitelli  25:57

One helpful bill that CCL has advocated for is called the Big Wires Act; it would require each region of the country to build more transmission lines connecting to their neighboring regions. A new report from MIT found that big wires would bring a lot of benefits, it would reduce climate and air pollution by allowing more clean solar and wind energy to be built and connected to the grid. It would reduce costs by allowing regions to share that cheap, clean energy with their neighbors. And it would also reduce blackouts by allowing regions to import extra electricity from their neighbors when their own power plants go down. 

Dana Nuccitelli  26:32

For example, due to an extreme weather event, passing the Big Wires Act would be a great situation for the country. It’s also important that in the process of streamlining permitting, we don’t cut out the input of communities that will be directly affected by these infrastructure projects. But by taking steps to improve early community involvement, we can actually reduce overall project timelines by avoiding the need for time-consuming lawsuits. We just need to make sure that permanent reform is done right. And that’s what CCL is working on. I’m Dana Nuccitelli. With the nerd corner. Thank you for being curious and for your commitment to climate progress. To join the discussion about climate science, technology, Economics, and Policy with the CCL research team, check out the nerd corner at CCL usa.org/nerd-corner That CCL usa.org/nerd-corner I hope to see you there.

Peterson Toscano  27:30

Thanks so much, Dana. If you have a question for Dana, email us radio @ citizens climate.org. We will make sure he gets it. Visit CCL usa.org/nerd.corner to see the chart of the week, regular blog posts, and an active forum where you can connect with other nerds.

Peterson Toscano  27:57

Now it’s time for our good news story with Horace Mo.

Horace Mo  28:04

Hi, this is your one and only Chinese correspondent, Horace, speaking. Today’s good news comes from China. Yes, you heard it right. The largest emitter of carbon dioxide in the world just released its first carbon trading regulations. It is a groundbreaking step for China to regulate its national emissions trading system aka the ETS. Now, a little historical background about the ETS for you, the ETS was officially launched back in 2021. To reduce emissions from the power sector. 

Horace Mo  28:42

The ETS emerged more than 15 years after the European Union launched the world’s first international carbon trading market. So late to the carbon trading party, the ETS will likely become the largest carbon trading market in the world. In my opinion, the newly released carbon trading regulation functions in two important ways. First, it designates the Ministry of Ecology and Environment to supervise ETS; the ministry will set a carbon emission threshold for electricity generation companies and create a plan to allocate emission allowances. Second and most importantly, the regulation will increase the violation penalties. 

Horace Mo  29:22

The minimum penalty will start at 500 South, and the Chinese yen will really isolated. I mean, the numbers sound a lot, right? Well, it actually cost 70,000 US dollars. For a big electricity generation company. This is not much but if the company got caught in violation, it must forfeit all illegal gains. The company will also be fined between five and 10 times those gains. Under this mechanism, the number will surely rise high. The Chinese carbon trading regulation will go into effect starting May 1, 2024. 

Horace Mo  29:59

While hearing so many promising aspects about the regulation like me, you might ponder the loopholes within the ETs that the regulation does not address. Currently, the ETS only covers electricity generation companies. Ultimately, though, the plan is to include companies from other heavily emitting sectors. In addition, there is still uncertainty about how China’s national emissions trading system could be fully implemented. If the program fails to deliver its promise, the consequences might curb China’s progress in slashing national carbon emissions. But, in general, this first carbon trading regulation sets a milestone for China’s effort in addressing climate change. The regulation manifests China’s determination to achieve its dual carbon goals, that is, to peak carbon dioxide emissions by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060. Therefore, with more years to come, let us hope and believe that China will fulfill its grand carbon goals and help the world shift to a greener future.

Peterson Toscano  31:16

Thank you, Horace. If you want to share a good news story with us, please email radio at citizens climate.org That’s radio at citizens climate.org. 

Peterson Toscano  31:28

We’ve been talking about roles, and what role you play I play in this climate work. And you may be thinking, you know what I need to deepen my climate work. If you’re looking for action steps visit our action page at CCL usa.org/action. In our show notes, or is put together an excellent list of other action steps you might consider. We also have some personality quizzes, a full transcript of today’s show, and much more. Visit CCL usa.org/radio, CCL usa.org/radio. 

Peterson Toscano  32:05

Next month, Elizabeth Rush, author of The Quickening Creation and Community at the Ends of the Earth, will tell us about her 52-day voyage in Antarctica. Brett Cease from CCL will chime in to tell us about the sights, sounds, and disgusting smells he experienced on his trip to Antarctica. Plus, you will hear the story of an artist who worked with hundreds of children to create a life-sized whale made out of plastic bags. They successfully connected that art project to propose a ban on plastic shopping bags. Stay tuned for next month’s episode. It’s episode 94. 

Peterson Toscano  32:46

Thank you so much for joining me, Erica, and Horace for this episode of Citizens’ Climate Radio. Many thanks to everyone who has been reposting what we share on social media. In fact, I will give a shout-out to some faithful followers. Many thanks to the following CCL chapters: Silicon Valley North San Diego, Boulder, Colorado, and CCL Arkansas. Thanks also to James Bradford, the third America’s future Michael Cooper, and the group known as 1.5. 

Peterson Toscano  33:17

You can follow us on Instagram, X, LinkedIn, Facebook, and TikTok, and feel free to repost anything you see. We’re very happy when that happens. Our listener voicemail line is 619-512-9846 plus one if you’re calling from outside the USA. That number again is 619-512-9646

Peterson Toscano  33:43

This episode of Citizens’ Climate Radio has been written and produced by me, Peterson Toscano, and the CCR team. Horace Mo, Erica Valdez and Dana Nuccitelli. Other technical support comes from Ricky Bradley and Brett Cease. Social Media assistance comes from Flannery Winchester. Moral support comes from Madeline Para, who just had a birthday. The music on today’s show comes from epidemicsound.com. 

Peterson Toscano  34:11

Please share Citizens’ Climate Radio with your friends and your followers. Visit CCL usa.org/radio. To see our show notes and find links to our guests. Citizens’ Climate Radio is a project of Citizens’ Climate Education.

The post Episode 93: What is Your Climate Change Role?  appeared first on Citizens' Climate Lobby.

Episode 93: What is Your Climate Change Role? 

Continue Reading

Greenhouse Gases

DeBriefed 15 August 2025: Raging wildfires; Xi’s priorities; Factchecking the Trump climate report

Published

on

Welcome to Carbon Brief’s DeBriefed. 
An essential guide to the week’s key developments relating to climate change.

This week

Blazing heat hits Europe

FANNING THE FLAMES: Wildfires “fanned by a heatwave and strong winds” caused havoc across southern Europe, Reuters reported. It added: “Fire has affected nearly 440,000 hectares (1,700 square miles) in the eurozone so far in 2025, double the average for the same period of the year since 2006.” Extreme heat is “breaking temperature records across Europe”, the Guardian said, with several countries reporting readings of around 40C.

HUMAN TOLL: At least three people have died in the wildfires erupting across Spain, Turkey and Albania, France24 said, adding that the fires have “displaced thousands in Greece and Albania”. Le Monde reported that a child in Italy “died of heatstroke”, while thousands were evacuated from Spain and firefighters “battled three large wildfires” in Portugal.

UK WILDFIRE RISK: The UK saw temperatures as high as 33.4C this week as England “entered its fourth heatwave”, BBC News said. The high heat is causing “nationally significant” water shortfalls, it added, “hitting farms, damaging wildlife and increasing wildfires”. The Daily Mirror noted that these conditions “could last until mid-autumn”. Scientists warn the UK faces possible “firewaves” due to climate change, BBC News also reported.

Around the world

  • GRID PRESSURES: Iraq suffered a “near nationwide blackout” as elevated power demand – due to extreme temperatures of around 50C – triggered a transmission line failure, Bloomberg reported.
  • ‘DIRE’ DOWN UNDER: The Australian government is keeping a climate risk assessment that contains “dire” implications for the continent “under wraps”, the Australian Financial Review said.
  • EXTREME RAINFALL: Mexico City is “seeing one of its heaviest rainy seasons in years”, the Washington Post said. Downpours in the Japanese island of Kyushu “caused flooding and mudslides”, according to Politico. In Kashmir, flash floods killed 56 and left “scores missing”, the Associated Press said.
  • SOUTH-SOUTH COOPERATION: China and Brazil agreed to “ensure the success” of COP30 in a recent phone call, Chinese state news agency Xinhua reported.
  • PLASTIC ‘DEADLOCK’: Talks on a plastic pollution treaty have failed again at a summit in Geneva, according to the Guardian, with countries “deadlocked” on whether it should include “curbs on production and toxic chemicals”.

15

The number of times by which the most ethnically-diverse areas in England are more likely to experience extreme heat than its “least diverse” areas, according to new analysis by Carbon Brief.


Latest climate research

  • As many as 13 minerals critical for low-carbon energy may face shortages under 2C pathways | Nature Climate Change
  • A “scoping review” examined the impact of climate change on poor sexual and reproductive health and rights in sub-Saharan Africa | PLOS One
  • A UK university cut the carbon footprint of its weekly canteen menu by 31% “without students noticing” | Nature Food

(For more, see Carbon Brief’s in-depth daily summaries of the top climate news stories on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday.)

Captured

Factchecking Trump’s climate report

A report commissioned by the US government to justify rolling back climate regulations contains “at least 100 false or misleading statements”, according to a Carbon Brief factcheck involving dozens of leading climate scientists. The report, compiled in two months by five hand-picked researchers, inaccurately claims that “CO2-induced warming might be less damaging economically than commonly believed” and misleadingly states that “excessively aggressive [emissions] mitigation policies could prove more detrimental than beneficial”80

Spotlight

Does Xi Jinping care about climate change?

This week, Carbon Brief unpacks new research on Chinese president Xi Jinping’s policy priorities.

On this day in 2005, Xi Jinping, a local official in eastern China, made an unplanned speech when touring a small village – a rare occurrence in China’s highly-choreographed political culture.

In it, he observed that “lucid waters and lush mountains are mountains of silver and gold” – that is, the environment cannot be sacrificed for the sake of growth.

(The full text of the speech is not available, although Xi discussed the concept in a brief newspaper column – see below – a few days later.)

In a time where most government officials were laser-focused on delivering economic growth, this message was highly unusual.

Forward-thinking on environment

As a local official in the early 2000s, Xi endorsed the concept of “green GDP”, which integrates the value of natural resources and the environment into GDP calculations.

He also penned a regular newspaper column, 22 of which discussed environmental protection – although “climate change” was never mentioned.

This focus carried over to China’s national agenda when Xi became president.

New research from the Asia Society Policy Institute tracked policies in which Xi is reported by state media to have “personally” taken action.

It found that environmental protection is one of six topics in which he is often said to have directly steered policymaking.

Such policies include guidelines to build a “Beautiful China”, the creation of an environmental protection inspection team and the “three-north shelterbelt” afforestation programme.

“It’s important to know what Xi’s priorities are because the top leader wields outsized influence in the Chinese political system,” Neil Thomas, Asia Society Policy Institute fellow and report co-author, told Carbon Brief.

Local policymakers are “more likely” to invest resources in addressing policies they know have Xi’s attention, to increase their chances for promotion, he added.

What about climate and energy?

However, the research noted, climate and energy policies have not been publicised as bearing Xi’s personal touch.

“I think Xi prioritises environmental protection more than climate change because reducing pollution is an issue of social stability,” Thomas said, noting that “smoggy skies and polluted rivers” were more visible and more likely to trigger civil society pushback than gradual temperature increases.

The paper also said topics might not be linked to Xi personally when they are “too technical” or “politically sensitive”.

For example, Xi’s landmark decision for China to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060 is widely reported as having only been made after climate modelling – facilitated by former climate envoy Xie Zhenhua – showed that this goal was achievable.

Prior to this, Xi had never spoken publicly about carbon neutrality.

Prof Alex Wang, a University of California, Los Angeles professor of law not involved in the research, noted that emphasising Xi’s personal attention may signal “top” political priorities, but not necessarily Xi’s “personal interests”.

By not emphasising climate, he said, Xi may be trying to avoid “pushing the system to overprioritise climate to the exclusion of the other priorities”.

There are other ways to know where climate ranks on the policy agenda, Thomas noted:

“Climate watchers should look at what Xi says, what Xi does and what policies Xi authorises in the name of the ‘central committee’. Is Xi talking more about climate? Is Xi establishing institutions and convening meetings that focus on climate? Is climate becoming a more prominent theme in top-level documents?”

Watch, read, listen

TRUMP EFFECT: The Columbia Energy Exchange podcast examined how pressure from US tariffs could affect India’s clean energy transition.

NAMIBIAN ‘DESTRUCTION’: The National Observer investigated the failure to address “human rights abuses and environmental destruction” claims against a Canadian oil company in Namibia.

‘RED AI’: The Network for the Digital Economy and the Environment studied the state of current research on “Red AI”, or the “negative environmental implications of AI”.

Coming up

Pick of the jobs

DeBriefed is edited by Daisy Dunne. Please send any tips or feedback to debriefed@carbonbrief.org.

This is an online version of Carbon Brief’s weekly DeBriefed email newsletter. Subscribe for free here.

The post DeBriefed 15 August 2025: Raging wildfires; Xi’s priorities; Factchecking the Trump climate report appeared first on Carbon Brief.

DeBriefed 15 August 2025: Raging wildfires; Xi’s priorities; Factchecking the Trump climate report

Continue Reading

Greenhouse Gases

Cropped 13 August 2025: Fossil-fuelled bird decline; ‘Deadly’ wildfires; Empty nature fund

Published

on

We handpick and explain the most important stories at the intersection of climate, land, food and nature over the past fortnight.

This is an online version of Carbon Brief’s fortnightly Cropped email newsletter. Subscribe for free here.

Key developments

‘Deadly’ wildfires

WINE BRAKE: France experienced its “largest wildfire in decades”, which scorched more than 16,000 hectares in the country’s southern Aude region, the Associated Press said. “Gusting winds” fanned the flames, Reuters reported, but local winemakers and mayors also “blam[ed] the loss of vineyards”, which can act as a “natural, moisture-filled brake against wildfires”, for the fire’s rapid spread. It added that thousands of hectares of vineyards were removed in Aude over the past year. Meanwhile, thousands of people were evacuated from “deadly” wildfires in Spain, the Guardian said, with blazes ongoing in other parts of Europe.

MAJOR FIRES: Canada is experiencing its second-worst wildfire season on record, CBC News reported. More than 7.3m hectares burned in 2025, “more than double the 10-year average for this time of year”, the broadcaster said. The past three fire seasons were “among the 10 worst on record”, CBC News added. Dr Mike Flannigan from Thompson Rivers University told the Guardian: “This is our new reality…The warmer it gets, the more fires we see.” Elsewhere, the UK is experiencing a record year for wildfires, with more than 40,000 hectares of land burned so far in 2025, according to Carbon Brief.

Subscribe: Cropped
  • Sign up to Carbon Brief’s free “Cropped” email newsletter. A fortnightly digest of food, land and nature news and views. Sent to your inbox every other Wednesday.

WESTERN US: The US state of Colorado has recorded one of its largest wildfires in history in recent days, the Guardian said. The fire “charred” more than 43,300 hectares of land and led to the temporary evacuation of 179 inmates from a prison, the newspaper said. In California, a fire broke out “during a heatwave” and burned more than 2,000 hectares before it was contained, the Los Angeles Times reported. BBC News noted: “Wildfires have become more frequent in California, with experts citing climate change as a key factor. Hotter, drier conditions have made fire seasons longer and more destructive.”

FIRE FUNDING: “Worsening fires” in the Brazilian Amazon threaten new rainforest funding proposals due to be announced at the COP30 climate summit later this year, experts told Climate Home News. The new initiatives include the Tropical Forests Forever Facility, which the outlet said “aims to generate a flow of international investment to pay countries annually in proportion to their preserved tropical forests”. The outlet added: “If fires in the Amazon continue to worsen in the years to come, eligibility for funding could be jeopardised, Brazil’s environment ministry acknowledged.”

Farming impacts

OUT OF ORBIT: US president Donald Trump moved to “shut down” two space missions which monitor carbon dioxide and plant health, the Associated Press reported. Ending these NASA missions would “potentially shu[t] off an important source of data for scientists, policymakers and farmers”, the outlet said. Dr David Crisp, a retired NASA scientist, said the missions can detect the “glow” of plant growth, which the outlet noted “helps monitor drought and predict food shortages that can lead to civil unrest and famine”.

FARM EXTREMES: Elsewhere, Reuters said that some farmers are considering “abandoning” a “drought-hit” agricultural area in Hungary as “climate change cuts crop yields and reduces groundwater levels”. Scientists warned that rising temperatures and low rainfall threaten the region’s “agricultural viability”, the newswire added. Meanwhile, the Premium Times in Nigeria said that some farmers are “harvest[ing] crops prematurely” due to flooding fears. A community in the south-eastern state of Imo “has endured recurrent floods, which wash away crops and incomes alike” over the past decade, the newspaper noted.

SECURITY RISKS: Food supply chains in the UK face “escalating threats from climate impacts and the migration they are triggering”, according to a report covered by Business Green. The outlet said that £3bn worth of UK food imports originated from the 20 countries “with the highest numbers of climate-driven displacements” in 2024, based on analysis from the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit. The analysis highlighted that “climate impacts on food imports pose a threat to UK food security”. Elsewhere, an opinion piece in Dialogue Earth explored how the “role of gender equity in food security remains critically unaddressed”.

Spotlight

Fossil-fuelled bird decline

This week, Carbon Brief covers a new study tracing the impact of fossil-fuelled climate change on tropical birds.

Over the past few years, biologists have recorded sharp declines in bird numbers across tropical rainforests – even in areas untouched by humans – with the cause remaining a mystery.

A new study published this week in Nature Ecology and Evolution could help to shed light on this alarming phenomenon.

The research combined ecological and climate attribution techniques for the first time to trace the fingerprint of fossil-fuelled climate change on declining bird populations.

It found that an increase in heat extremes driven by climate change has caused tropical bird populations to decline by 25-38% in the period 1950-2020, when compared to a world without warming.

In their paper, the authors noted that birds in the tropics could be living close to their “thermal limits”.

Study lead author Dr Maximilian Kotz, a climate scientist at the Barcelona Supercomputing Center in Spain, explained to Carbon Brief:

“High temperature extremes can induce direct mortality in bird populations due to hyperthermia and dehydration. Even when they don’t [kill birds immediately], there’s evidence that this can then affect body condition which, in turn, affects breeding behaviour and success.”

Conservation implications

The findings have “potential ramifications” for commonly proposed conservation strategies, such as increasing the amount of land in the tropics that is protected for nature, the authors said. In their paper, they continued:

“While we do not disagree that these strategies are necessary for abating tropical habitat loss…our research shows there is now an additional urgent need to investigate strategies that can allow for the persistence of tropical species that are vulnerable to heat extremes.”

In some parts of the world, scientists and conservationists are looking into how to protect wildlife from more intense and frequent climate extremes, Kotz said.

He referenced one project in Australia which is working to protect threatened wildlife following periods of extreme heat, drought and bushfires.

Prof Alex Pigot, a biodiversity scientist at University College London (UCL), who was not involved in the research, said the findings reinforced the need to systematically monitor the impact of extreme weather on wildlife. He told Carbon Brief:

“We urgently need to develop early warning systems to be able to anticipate in advance where and when extreme heatwaves and droughts are likely to impact populations – and also rapidly scale up our monitoring of species and ecosystems so that we can reliably detect these effects.”

There is further coverage of this research on Carbon Brief’s website.

News and views

EMPTY CALI FUND: A major voluntary fund for biodiversity remains empty more than five months after its launch, Carbon Brief revealed. The Cali Fund, agreed at the COP16 biodiversity negotiations last year, was set up for companies who rely on nature’s resources to share some of their earnings with the countries where many of these resources originate. Big pharmaceutical companies did not take up on opportunities to commit to contributing to the fund or be involved in its launch in February 2025, emails released to Carbon Brief showed. Just one US biotechnology firm has pledged to contribute to the fund in the future.

LOSING HOPE: Western Australia’s Ningaloo reef – long considered a “hope spot” among the country’s coral reefs for evading major bleaching events – is facing its “worst-ever coral bleaching”, Australia’s ABC News reported. The ocean around Ningaloo has been “abnormally” warm since December, resulting in “unprecedented” bleaching and mortality, a research scientist told the outlet. According to marine ecologist Dr Damian Thomson, “up to 50% of the examined coral was dead in May”, the Sydney Morning Herald said. Thomson told the newspaper: “You realise your children are probably never going to see Ningaloo the way you saw it.”

‘DEVASTATION BILL’: Brazil’s president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, signed a “contentious” environmental bill into law, but “partially vetoed” some of the widely criticised elements, the Financial Times reported. Critics, who dubbed it the “devastation bill”, said it “risked fuelling deforestation and would harm Brazil’s ecological credentials” just months before hosting the COP30 climate summit. The newspaper said: “The leftist leader struck down or altered 63 of 400 provisions in the legislation, which was designed to speed up and modernise environmental licensing for new business and infrastructure developments.” The vetoes need to be approved by congress, “where Lula lacks a majority”, the newspaper noted.

RAINFOREST DRILLING: The EU has advised the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) against allowing oil drilling in a vast stretch of rainforest and peatland that was jointly designated a “green corridor” earlier this year, Climate Home News reported. In May, the DRC announced that it planned to open the conservation area for drilling, the publication said. A spokesperson for the European Commission told Climate Home News that the bloc “fully acknowledges and respects the DRC’s sovereign right to utilise its diverse resources for economic development”, but that it “highlights the fact that green alternatives have facilitated the protection of certain areas”.

NEW PLAN FOR WETLANDS: During the 15th meeting of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, held in Zimbabwe from 23 to 31 July, countries agreed on the adoption of a new 10-year strategic plan for conserving and sustainably using the world’s wetlands. Down to Earth reported that 13 resolutions were adopted, including “enhancing monitoring and reporting, capacity building and mobilisation of resources”. During the talks, Zimbabwe’s environment minister announced plans to restore 250,000 hectares of degraded wetlands by 2030 and Saudi Arabia entered the Convention on Wetlands. Panamá will host the next COP on wetlands in July 2028.

MEAT MADNESS: DeSmog covered the details of a 2021 public relations document that revealed how the meat industry is trying to “make beef seem climate-friendly”. The industry “may have enlisted environmental groups to persuade people to ‘feel better’ about eating beef”, the outlet said, based on this document. The strategy was created by a communications agency, MHP Group, and addressed to the Global Roundtable for Sustainable Beef. One of the key messages of the plan was to communicate the “growing momentum in the beef industry to protect and nurture the Earth’s natural resources”. MHP Group did not respond to a request for comment, according to DeSmog.

Watch, read, listen

MAKING WAVES: A livestream of deep-sea “crustaceans, sponges and sea cucumbers” has “captivated” people in Argentina, the New York Times outlined.

BAFFLING BIRDS: The Times explored the backstory to the tens of thousands of “exotic-looking” parakeets found in parks across Britain.

PLANT-BASED POWER: In the Conversation, Prof Paul Behrens outlined how switching to a plant-based diet could help the UK meet its climate and health targets.

MARINE DISCRIMINATION: Nature spoke to a US-based graduate student who co-founded Minorities in Shark Science about her experiences of racism and sexism in the research field.

New science

  • Applying biochar – a type of charcoal – to soils each year over a long period of time can have “sustained benefits for crop yield and greenhouse gas mitigation”, according to a Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences study. 
  • New research, published in PLOS Climate, found that nearly one-third of highly migratory fish species in the US waters of the Atlantic Ocean have “high” or “very high” vulnerability to climate change, but the majority of species have “some level of resilience and adaptability”.
  • A study in Communications Earth & Environment found a “notable greening trend” in China’s wetlands over 2000-23, with an increasing amount of carbon being stored in the plants growing there.

In the diary

Cropped is researched and written by Dr Giuliana Viglione, Aruna Chandrasekhar, Daisy Dunne, Orla Dwyer and Yanine Quiroz. Please send tips and feedback to cropped@carbonbrief.org

The post Cropped 13 August 2025: Fossil-fuelled bird decline; ‘Deadly’ wildfires; Empty nature fund appeared first on Carbon Brief.

Cropped 13 August 2025: Fossil-fuelled bird decline; ‘Deadly’ wildfires; Empty nature fund

Continue Reading

Greenhouse Gases

Holding the line on climate: EPA

Published

on

A white man sits at a conference room style table, with papers in front of him, gesturing as he speaks. Three other people in business attire sit in the seats next to him.

CCL submits a formal comment on EPA’s proposed endangerment finding rollback

By Dana Nuccitelli, CCL Research Manager

On July 29, the EPA proposed to rescind its 2009 endangerment finding that forms the basis of all federal climate pollution regulations. 

Without the endangerment finding, the EPA may not be allowed or able to regulate greenhouse gas pollution from sources like power plants or vehicle tailpipes, as they have done for years. News coverage has framed this as a “radical transformation” and a “bid to scrap almost all pollution regulations,” so it has appropriately alarmed many folks in the climate and environment space.

At CCL, we focus our efforts on working with Congress to implement durable climate policies, and so we don’t normally take actions on issues like this that relate to federal agencies or the courts. Other organizations focus their efforts on those branches of the government and are better equipped to spearhead this type of moment, and we appreciate those allies. 

But in this case, we did see an opportunity for CCL’s voice — and our focus on Congress — to play a role here. We decided to submit a formal comment on this EPA action for two reasons.

First, this decision could have an immense impact by eliminating every federal regulation of climate pollutants in a worst case scenario. Second, this move relates to our work because the EPA is misinterpreting the text and intent of laws passed by Congress. Our representatives have done their jobs by passing legislation over the past many decades that supports and further codifies the EPA’s mandate to regulate climate pollution. That includes the Clean Air Act, and more recently, the Inflation Reduction Act. We at CCL wanted to support our members of Congress by making these points in a formal comment.

There has been a tremendous public response to this action. In just over one week, the EPA already received over 44,000 public comments on its decision, and the public comment period will remain open for another five weeks, until September 15. 

To understand more about the details and potential outcomes of the EPA’s actions, read my article on the subject at Yale Climate Connections, our discussion on CCL Community, and CCL’s formal comment, which represents our entire organization. As our comment concludes,

“In its justifications for rescinding the 2009 endangerment finding, the Reconsideration has misinterpreted the text of the Clean Air Act, Congress’ decadeslong support for the EPA’s mandate to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles and other major sources, and the vast body of peer-reviewed climate science research that documents the increasingly dangerous threats that those emissions pose to Americans’ health and welfare. Because the bases of these justifications are fundamentally flawed, CCL urges the EPA to withdraw its ill-conceived Reconsideration of the 2009 endangerment finding. The EPA has both the authority and the responsibility to act. Americans cannot afford a retreat from science, law, and common sense in the face of a rapidly accelerating climate crisis.”

After the EPA responds to the public comment record and finalizes its decision, this issue will ultimately be decided by the Supreme Court several years from now. 

In the meantime, CCL will continue to focus our efforts on areas where we can make the biggest difference in preserving a livable climate. Right now, that involves contacting our members of Congress to urge them to fully fund key climate and energy programs and protect critical work at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and Department of Energy. We’ve set an ambitious goal of sending 10,000 messages to our members of Congress, so let’s all do what CCL does best and make our voices heard on this critical issue.

This action by the EPA also reminds us that federal regulations are fragile. They tend to change with each new administration coming into the White House. Legislation passed by Congress – especially when done on a bipartisan basis – is much more durable. That’s why CCL’s work, as one of very few organizations engaging in nonpartisan advocacy for long-lasting climate legislation, is so critical. 

That’s especially true right now when we’re seeing the Trump administration slam shut every executive branch door to addressing climate change. We need Congress to step up now more than ever to implement durable solutions like funding key climate and energy programs, negotiating a new bipartisan comprehensive permitting reform bill, implementing healthy forest solutions like the Fix Our Forests Act, and advancing conversations about policies to put a price on carbon pollution. Those are the kinds of effective, durable, bipartisan climate solutions that CCL is uniquely poised to help become law and make a real difference in preserving a livable climate.

For other examples of how CCL is using our grassroots power to help ensure that Congress stays effective on climate in this political landscape, see our full “Holding the Line on Climate” blog series.

The post Holding the line on climate: EPA appeared first on Citizens' Climate Lobby.

Holding the line on climate: EPA

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com