Author, speaker, and activist Eileen Flanagan
Episode 93: What is Your Climate Change Role?
In this month’s episode of Citizens’ Climate Radio, Eileen Flanagan, a writer, social change teacher, Quaker, and activist, dives deep with host Peterson Toscano into four different roles people have traditionally taken in change movements. In addition, Erica Valdez and Horace Mo join Peterson for a vibrant discussion about their personal experiences in taking one of these roles.
Finding Your Role
In Eileen Flanagan’s words, the four recurring roles in change movements include rebels, advocates, organizers, and helpers. One of the best ways to understand these four roles is through their different orientations. Eileen says, “The helpers’ orientation is: what can I do to improve things without messing with the system?” She mentions climate change helpers who take the initiative to help insulate houses or help put solar panels on a neighbor’s roof. A helper also prepares food for events, provides rides for volunteer lobbyists, and donates money to a climate organization.
Elieen further explains, “An advocate takes the role of trying to use the tools of the system to change things.” Advocates often capitalize on lobbying and lawsuits to convince elected officials and people in power to make decisions.
In contrast, Eileen points out,
Rebels use disruptive tactics. They don’t do letter writing; they don’t do lobbying. Instead, they protest of various kinds. In my tradition, we usually use nonviolent direct action, targeting a decision maker, maybe a corporation, and trying to get them to change a policy through consistent troublemaking.
Lastly, she shares, “Organizers are the trickiest because they can use different tactics. But what makes someone an organizer is they are oriented toward their group, toward their community.” She says, “The focus of the organizer is what will our group do.” She then talks about the Montgomery Bus Boycott, when Rosa Parks not only played the rebel role but was also an organizer.
Livehouse With Peterson, Horace, and Erica:
If you are unsure which role best suits you, listen to the conversation between Peterson, Horace, and Erica. They reflect on their experiences playing change movement roles in their community. Erica shares her experience working as an organizer on and off campus at her university. Her role has helped her realize the significance of team effort and mutual trust.
Horace speaks about volunteering to help a local, sustainable food organization hand out free vegan burgers to football attendants near a stadium. Being a helper opened him up to new ideas and further inspired him to continue such work.
Good News Story
Horace Mo in Chongqing shares a good news story about China’s new carbon trading regulations.
For China to regulate its National Emissions Trading System is a big step. Horace shares some of the details. The Chinese carbon trading regulation will go into effect starting May 1, 2024. Learn more about China’s ETS from the International Carbon Action Partnership.
If you have a good news story to share, email radio @ citizensclimateradio.org or leave a message at our visiting voicemail line: (619) 512-9646
Nerd Corner
Citizens’ Climate’s Research Coordinator, Dana Nuccitelli, discusses the very geeky world of permitting reform. Dana highlights climate research (and makes it understandable) for fellow nerds and the nerd curious! Visit The Nerd Corner to see the Chart of the Week, regular posts, and an active forum to connect with other nerds.
Take a Meaningful Next Step
Each month, we will suggest meaningful, achievable, and measurable next steps for you to consider. We recognize that action is an antidote to despair. If you need help with what you can do, consider one of the following next steps.
Since the episode covered the topics of our role in the climate movement, you can take one of these online quizzes to learn more about yourself and your place in the world.
1. Podcast Engagement
- We would love to hear your thoughts and personal experiences of taking one of the change movement roles! You are welcome to email us at radio @ citizensclimatelobby.org, or even join and chat with us on the show! You can also leave a voice mail (619) 512-9646.
- Please share our show on your social media and with your friends. If you listen on Apple Podcasts or Spotify, we would LOVE a review.
2. Read More About Eileen Flanagan
- If you ever want to learn more about the four roles discussed by Eileen Flanagan, you can visit her website, ElieenFlanagan.com, to learn about her published books, online lessons, and informative writings.
3. Carbon Fee and Dividend Movement (For College Students)
- Explore the Carbon Fee and Dividend movement, which advocates for effective climate policies. They creatively engage college students, faculty, and staff in their campaigns. This movement also facilitates direct connections with lawmakers
- Utilize the hashtag #carbonfeeanddividend on social media.
- Learn more at CFDmovement.com and follow them on Instagram @carbonfeeanddividend.
4. Citizens’ Climate Lobby National Youth Action Team (For Middle and High School Students)
- Students can get involved with the CCL National Youth Action Team. Participate in initiatives such as the Great School Electrification Challenge.
- Visit Youth.CitizensClimatelobby.org to learn more, and follow them on Instagram @CitizensClimateYouth.
5. Additional Climate Action Resource (For anyone at any time)
- For those seeking more ways to take action and potentially find one of their change movement roles, you can explore the action page at CCLusa.org/action.
Listen Now!
Listener Survey:
We want to hear your feedback about this episode. After you listen, feel free to fill in this short survey. Your feedback will help us make new decisions about the content, guests, and style of the show. You can fill it out anonymously and answer whichever questions you like. You can also reach us by email: radio@citizensclimatelobby.org
You can hear Citizens’ Climate Radio on
Also, feel free to connect with other listeners, suggest program ideas, and respond to programs on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, or TikTok
Read the Transcript
Episode 93: What is Your Climate Change Role?
SPEAKERS
Peterson Toscano, Horace Mo, Eileen Flanagan, Erica Valdez, Dana Nuccitelli
Peterson Toscano 00:00
Hi there, and welcome to Citizens’ Climate Radio. This is your climate change podcast. In this show, we highlight people’s stories, we celebrate your successes, and together, we share strategies for discussing climate change. I’m your host, Peterson Toscano. Hey there. Welcome to Episode 93 of Citizens’ Climate Radio project of Citizens’ Climate Education. This episode is airing on Friday, March 22, 2024.
Today, we’re going to consider the four roles changemakers traditionally take Are you an advocate, a helper, an organizer, or perhaps a rebel? Maybe you take on different roles in your work to address the causes and the impacts of climate change. Eileen Flanagan, a Quaker author, speaker and climate change, mover and shaker will explain the four rules for us. Then you’re going to hear a lively conversation I had with two of my team members.
Peterson Toscano 01:00
Dana Nuccitelli gets super nerdy with us in the nerd corner. He’s geeking out over permitting reform. It’s also known as permitting modernization. Horace Mo joins us from Changqing, China, with good news about his country’s first carbon trading regulations. But first, I want to introduce you to our newest Citizens’ Climate Radio team member, Erica Valdez.
Erica Valdez 01:31
Have you ever heard of the Inland Empire? To other locals, this valley is a sweet spot of Southern California where you can spend time at the beach, the mountains, and the desert all in one day. To me the Inland Empire is the region I call home. Hi, everyone. My name is Eric about this. I’m a senior at Northern Arizona University majoring in environmental sustainability and minoring in Spanish and community engagement. Growing up in this beautiful part of California. I spent most of my childhood outdoors, whether at the beach, on camping trips, or on the streets in my neighborhood, staying connected to my surrounding environment became a habit.
Erica Valdez 02:04
As I got older and some of my time outdoors was replaced by the news, I noticed everyone talking about climate change. Anchors use buzzwords like increasing temperatures and rising sea levels. They encouraged us to do our part by taking shorter showers and separating our recyclables. Looking back these concerns and recommendations were going in one ear and out the other not just for me, but for those around me. It wasn’t until I did some research and took a climate science class in high school that I realized how big of a problem this really was. My confusion quickly turned to curiosity and passion.
Erica Valdez 02:38
Now, I study the environment in Flagstaff, Arizona, which is unlike the usual desert landscape that comes to mind. Instead, picture a small college town in the snowy mountains of Arizona. Here I’m grateful to have the Coconino National Forest in my backyard. While at school, I explore the surrounding land. I also enjoy relaxing in a hammock on campus. Oh, and I recently started bouldering, but I can’t say I’m the best at it. I also take advantage of living in the first Dark Sky City in the United States. Did you know that Flagstaff has very low light pollution? This means that the night sky is not polluted with any artificial light, and it makes for excellent stargazing.
Erica Valdez 03:13
Here in northern Arizona, I’m able to recognize the importance of our environment just as I did as a kid in California, only things are a little different. Now, as I’ve watched shifts in our climate become more intense feelings of climate, Doom and anxiety have grown within me. I don’t know about you, but talking and even just thinking about climate change can exhaust me, but I refuse to let it overwhelm me. Because of these feelings. I just to learn how I can make an impact. I decided to pursue a degree in environmental sustainability.
Erica Valdez 03:39
I’m committed to supporting others in this global conversation to communicate climate change in a way that encourages, not creates, fear or guilt. I want to ensure that future generations have the opportunity to connect with their environment as I did, and I’m very excited to do this through my work with Citizens’ Climate Radio.
Peterson Toscano 04:12
Thank you, Erica, and welcome aboard. In a moment, Erica Valdez will join Horace Mo and me for a spirited conversation about our roles in the climate movement.
Peterson Toscano 04:25
None of us discovers our roles right away. And our roles do grow, change, and develop over time. So what about you? What’s your role on our rapidly changing planet? In 2017, we featured Eileen Flanagan it was for Episode Nine of this podcast. As the board chair of Earth Quaker Action Team or EQAT, Eileen led a successful effort to stop one of the largest banks in the United States from financing mountaintop removal coal mining leader. As the equate campaign director I, Eileen played a pivotal role in launching a global campaign against Vanguard. This is the largest investor in fossil fuels worldwide. Her dedication and leadership have made a significant impact on the fight against climate change.
Peterson Toscano 05:14
So, I asked Eileen about the steps we can take to move the public and lawmakers to action. She answered, what do you know about the four roles most commonly taken on by changemakers? I was like that there are four of them. Lucky for you, Eileen will break them down for us. After I leave, one again explains the four roles. Erica Valdez, a college student studying change movements, will chat with me about the organizer role. This one is the hardest to explain. Erica goes into more detail for us and provides some very inspiring examples. Horace Mo will then jump into the conversation to tell us about the role that currently best suits him. Eileen told me about Bill Moyer. No, not the PBS personality. This Bill Moyer was an engineer who dove deep into social change movements. He then spent much of his life leading trainings around nonviolent direct action. He also identified and taught successful strategies for bringing about social change. Eileen shared with me some of Moyers’s teachings about the roles we might take when seeking to change the world around us.
Eileen Flanagan 06:32
He found that four roles showed up over and over again. The names we’ve given them are helper, advocate, organizer, and rebel. They show up in all kinds of ways. And the way to think of it is really what is their orientation.
Eileen Flanagan 06:49
So a helper’s orientation is, what can I do to make things better without messing with the system? So if you’re concerned about climate change, a helper might insulate their home, put solar panels on, maybe do that in their congregation, and try to live a low-carbon footprint life. That sort of thing would be attractive to someone who’s naturally a helper.
Eileen Flanagan 07:12
An advocate takes the role of trying to use the tools of the system to change things. So lobbying, using lawsuits, trying to convince elected officials and people in power to make decisions, essentially using the tools of the system.
Eileen Flanagan 07:30
In contrast, a rebel uses disruptive tactics, they don’t do letter writing, they don’t do lobbying. Instead, they do protests of various kinds. In my tradition, we usually use nonviolent direct action, targeting a decision maker, maybe a corporation, and trying to get them to change a policy through consistent troublemaking. The fourth role is called the organizer.
Eileen Flanagan 07:54
And in some ways, the organizer is the trickiest because they can use different kinds of tactics. But the thing that makes someone an organizer is they are oriented toward their group toward their community. So, for example, someone who says, Let’s get our congregation together and see what we can do together about climate change. That’s a very organizer way of thinking about it. And the group might decide to insulate the church, or they might decide to go lobby together or they might take up a rebel tactic. The focus of the organizer is what will our group do? So this shows up again and again in different kinds of social change.
Eileen Flanagan 08:36
If you think about the Montgomery Bus Boycott, Rosa Parks was the rebel who got arrested for refusing to move on the bus. But there would have been a big thing if it hadn’t been for the woman who stayed up all night mimeograph thing, leaflets saying, let’s all both boycott the buses on Monday. She played the organizer role and got people out; the advocate role was played by the NAACP, which filed a lawsuit against the Montgomery bus system. And then helpers were the people who drove people; the ordinary citizens of Montgomery and the African American community walked to work for over a year in order to put pressure on the bus company; they wouldn’t have been able to do that without the helpers who came and gave people rides and things like that.
Eileen Flanagan 09:21
One thing I found really helpful about the four roles is to realize that organizations play a niche, but then each organization needs, in some way, people who have these different strengths. So even though my group we have helpers, and they’re the people who bring cookies to the meeting, boy, are we glad that they’re part of us, right? If we do civil disobedience, we need people who are thinking about taking care of people and things like that. So there’s an individual level two, finding out what are your gifts and proclivities that you can bring to the movement. Organizations are most effective when they pick one. An organization that tries to play all four roles is likely less effective because they’re jumping around too much.
Peterson Toscano 10:05
I love this conversation that Eileen Flanagan has started for us. And I think a lot about these roles. The rebel role is the one that some people think is the most obvious. I think it’s the hardest. There is one role, though, that I have a lot of questions about. And that’s the organizer’s role. I understand it, and I want to understand it better. So, to help me with that is our newest team member, Erica Valdez. Hey, Erica, how are you?
Erica Valdez 10:34
I’m good. Peterson,
Peterson Toscano 10:36
welcome to the show your very first time on Citizens’ Climate Radio.
Erica Valdez 10:40
Yes, I’m very excited to be here.
Peterson Toscano 10:41
So you’ve done some research for your studies. And you’ve looked at this organizer role, what can you share with me and with the listener to help us better understand this particular role?
Erica Valdez 10:54
Before I started my studies, I had no idea that the organizer role existed, and it was just very hard to digest. First, I want to point out that in the world of organizing, we constantly refer to this process called the cycle of organizing. To touch on some of the points that Eileen makes, we do look inward onto the group or into the group, we always start by connecting with the people. This could be those in the community, those in the group, or those just involved in our mission; we start by building relationships in order to identify the issues. And once we connect with these people involved, we can plan on how to support and sustain the group and build collective power. And then, organizers and their groups carry out the action; organizers use similar tactics to the other four roles that we talked about. But throughout this whole cycle, it’s very important to reflect and evaluate so we don’t lose sight of the group vision.
Peterson Toscano 11:46
The thing that I appreciate most about and understand the most about the organizer model is that the organizer is not a leader in a traditional hierarchical sense, but more like a facilitator. Am I getting that right?
11:59
Exactly. You’re right on point. Organizers use relational and collaborative spaces. They don’t just lead all alone; the extra tried to avoid one person leading and doing all the work because this could lead to potential burnout. I always ask people, have you ever had a group project and just taken the initiative to do all the work yourself? Yeah, it’s it’s very tiring. And I get over the work so fast. And this is what organizers try to avoid. Instead, they look for and identify the leaders. Yeah, they rarely lead the group alone.
Peterson Toscano 12:32
Can you give us any examples of like people in history that have done this kind of work?
Erica Valdez 12:39
There are so many examples throughout history that I could talk for days about, but one that stands out to me is Ella Baker. She’s a well known activist and grassroots organizer of the US United States Civil Rights Movement in the 50s and 60s. She advocated similarly to Luther King and Malcolm X, but she never prioritized being the face of the movement. Instead, she introduces this term called spadework, and in this context, refers to a spade as a gardening tool. It does a lot of the detail work to create these large, beautiful gardens, and she uses spadework to describe the behind-the-scenes, the nitty gritty work that keeps the momentum of the action, and often, this work is not seen or recognized. And through this, she prioritized building relationships and identifying the leaders in the movement so that it would outlast her. It was a really long-lasting movement. And she didn’t leave the group alone.
Peterson Toscano 13:36
It’s amazing. You mentioned Ella Baker because I just saw a movie, a biopic, that had her as one of the main characters. Really? Yeah, it’s this new movie on Netflix called Rustin, about Bayard Rustin, who was another organizer that many people never heard of because, like Ella Baker, he stayed behind the scenes. He also stayed behind the scenes, not just because he was an organizer, but because he was openly gay. At a time when that was really hard to be in it would have tanked the movement. So he stayed in the shadows in a way he organized the March on Washington, where Dr. King gave his famous speech, but he didn’t do it himself. He had a whole team of many young people that he helped to build that leadership to identify the leadership, just like you say. So, if anyone wants to see this in action, this movie Ruston is great because you see Ella Baker identifying Rustin as someone who needs to step up because he’s got great skills. And then you see him doing it, and it’s lovely to see it in action. And now that you explained all this, I’m like, oh, yeah, those organizers and organizer roles?
Yeah, those characteristics are the most admirable of the organizer role, and you can see it in so many people throughout history.
Peterson Toscano 14:51
What about you in the work that you’ve done so far? What roles have you taken, and which ones fit you best?
Erica Valdez 15:00
Before studying community organizing, I, again had no idea that these roles existed and that like we could distinguish characteristics between them. After I started studying it, I realized that in my roles on campus and off campus, I realized I wasn’t putting these things into practice when leading these groups or just being involved in these groups, and those around me are often facing a lot of burnout, or initiatives stop moving forward, which is very, very common. If we’re not putting these things into practice, as an organizer now, and I consider myself a community organizer, I’ve learned the importance of building relationships and identifying leaders, evaluating the whole time. What am I doing wrong? What’s working? How can I support my group better? And this has made all the difference in the groups that I’m involved in.
Peterson Toscano 15:48
I want to bring another voice into this conversation from a completely other country and timezone. And for you listening. We’re recording this well in the United States early in the morning. What time is it by you there, Erica? Right now?
Erica Valdez 16:02
It’s aout 8am.
Peterson Toscano 16:04
It’s about 10 am here in Pennsylvania. Joining us from China, where it’s about midnight, I think, or later, is our very own Horace Mo. Hey, Horace. Hey, Peterson. Hey, I hear it’s an auspicious day over there.
Horace Mo 16:22
Yes, it is. Just for our listeners, you might hear firecrackers or fireworks going off right now. So my window actually, it’s the Chinese New Year, so I can really help with that everybody’s in a very joyful vibes. Yeah, let’s get to the topic. I really agree with what Eric has said about her experience as an organizer. And I think her sharings actually deepen my understanding of the work of being an organizer, even though I’ve never had that kind of experience before. It is really amazing work that organizers like you are doing for social good. I identify. myself as a helper, and for our audience to know the definition of her helper is given by Eileen is what I can do to make things better. This idea strikes me the most; it indicates doable action at an individual level. Whenever I can offer support, or whatever that is needed by other people, it almost always brings me a fulfilling feeling that I am valued, and it is touching to see people smiling back at me or when I offer whatever help that they actually are in need. And I enjoy this kind of interaction with people around me.
Peterson Toscano 17:40
I feel very much that I’m a helper to I definitely not an organizer for you, or is where have you been a helper? And how have you shown yourself to be a helper?
Horace Mo 17:53
When I was announced grad at the University of Michigan, I actually volunteered for a local sustainable food organization. One idea was simple. The organization needed people to help them hand out free vegan burgers, which were so delicious. By the way, I once had three burgers for the organization just for breakfast. They tried to give away free vegan burgers to promote their brand. But the most important thing is to get people interested in vegan burgers, which are great alternatives to meat-based burgers. For our listeners. Gosh, if you’re listening to this, and you have not tried a vegan-based burger before, I strongly suggest you try out a vegan burger, which tastes almost exactly the same as meat-based burgers; they set up a booth by the football stadium, one of those college football game days. And I just helped them hand out those free vegan burgers to the fans who are going to the tailgate parties. It’s a simple task, I am confident that most people are able to handle burgers.
18:59
It’s super difficult to remember how important these little tasks are. And they can just sometimes get muddled and forgotten in the big picture. Not everyone needs to be an Ella Baker in order to make a difference. It’s these little tasks that everyone is able to do that make a very big difference in whatever mission we’re trying to accomplish.
Peterson Toscano 19:19
Yeah, and so often food is part of it, right preparing sandwiches or giving them out? The thing that I have found that I’m so pleased with is that I’m an introvert, so I’m super shy around people, which a lot of people don’t think about because, you know, I’m very engaged on the radio. I really struggle unless I have a role, and once I have a role, and it might be handing out vegan burgers or teaching or something, I feel much more confident and able to move within society because I’ve got a specific role to do. ,
Horace Mo 19:52
Yeah absolutely. I also consider myself an introvert I am now that type of person who can speak a lot or Just speak loudly in front of the public or in front of a lot of strangers. Handing out vegan based burgers is such a, just a cost surmise task for me to do, because they just feel relieved, but also value at the same time that I can contribute to a community work that I enjoy doing.
Peterson Toscano 20:19
I don’t know Erica, I’m starting to get a little suspicious that horse is working for “big vegan.”
Erica Valdez 20:26
It’s advocating for him.
Horace Mo 20:28
I mean, I’m not gonna lie, I just got to be frankie. That kind of opened the door for me. You know, when I was a helper for that organization, I also became a learner; I learned about the nutrients of those vegan-based burgers and what is the process of making those burgers. What are the gradients of those burgers? And what’s the difference between those vegan-based burgers, meat-based burgers, and especially the impact on our environment and the welfare of the animal so freakin based burgers, I guess, measured before? They’re so good. You have to try this. We haven’t? ,
Peterson Toscano 21:04
Yeah you keep pushing this? Yeah, I know. I don’t know, every time you get like a quarter every time you pay $1? Every time you see that, I wonder. But you know, as you’re saying this, like you went in to do this as a helper. And then you learn something. And I imagine you also got to know some people. And that’s the other thing that I think it’s important. When we’re looking to change the world, or change a law or change a system, we may not always be successful. In fact, often we’re not, we may have limited success at first, and it takes time. But other changes happen, changes with relationships, and people get to know each other, and you and your network, and you find out about other groups, and you learn other things. And that’s part of the change movement as well, not just the win, or the lose, but the building of the community.
Erica Valdez 21:51
Yeah, and that’s why I love the relational aspect of all of these roles. It creates a community that even if you try and fail, you’re trying and failing together, and it might spark a new initiative, it might, again, help us network in order to just get new ideas and bounce off of each other and create collaborative spaces. And that’s, that’s what I love about this work.
Peterson Toscano 22:12
Or is other than pushing vegan burgers, or is there anything else you want to add?
Horace Mo 22:16
I have to give a disclaimer: I did not get paid for selling or promoting vegan-based burgers. Yeah, I definitely echo what you said about being an organizer. People like you also need helpers like me, and we helpers also look up to you. We just might need that kind of person who can who can gather people together and come up with a blog to plan that we can work on something together. Each row that is played by either a helper or an organizer is equally important, together that will foster a very reciprocal relationship, which will definitely help people struggle for the same go, you know, proper and efficient way.
Peterson Toscano 22:59
So for you listening, what about you? Are you a helper, an advocate and organizer, or rebel? Are you part of an organization that may be an advocate organization, but within it, you’re not an advocate; you’re a helper or an organizer? We really would love to hear what you have to say. Feel free to send us an email radio at citizensclimate.org, and we’ll get back to you. if you want, you could actually be on the air to share some of your ideas. That email address again is radio at citizens. climate.org Erica aurus thank you so much for being on the show today and for helping so much with the production of Citizens’ Climate Radio.
Horace Mo 23:43
Thank you, Peterson.
Erica Valdez 23:45
Yeah, thank you super happy to be here.
Peterson Toscano 23:48
This episode of Citizens’ Climate Radio has been brought to you by Horace’s Vegan Burgers.
Horace Mo 23:57
I appreciate it.
Peterson Toscano 24:00
That was Horace Mo and Erica Valdez, members of the Citizens’ Climate Radio team. You also heard Quaker, author, speaker, and climate activist Eileen Flanagan. To learn more about islands books and online workshops, visit Eileen flanagan.com. In our show notes, I have links to other resources. I’ve even included online quizzes you can take to better understand yourself and the roles you play in society. Visit CCL usa.org/radio. That’s CCL usa.org/radio. Now it is time for the nerd corner.
Dana Nuccitelli 24:44
Hi, I’m Dana Nuccitelli. CCL research coordinator, and this is the nerd corner. I’m here to highlight some interesting new climate research for the nerds out there and to make it understandable for the nerd curious. In this episode, we consider the question What exactly is permitting reform? And why is it so important?
Dana Nuccitelli 25:04
A permit is how a local state or federal government gives the go ahead to start a new construction project. During the permitting process, the government makes sure that the construction and operation of the project won’t unduly harm workers, the local community or the environment. That’s an important process. But permitting adds time and expense to projects of all kinds. So it’s important to strike the right balance.
Dana Nuccitelli 25:27
We want the permitting process to be thorough but not take so long that it delays that critical clean energy transition. Right now, the permitting process is taking so long that if we don’t make it more efficient, we won’t be able to meet our national climate commitments. electrical transmission lines are particularly important because they’re needed to connect more cheap and clean solar and wind energy to the electrical grid. But new transmission lines currently take about a decade to permit and build, which is just too slow.
Dana Nuccitelli 25:57
One helpful bill that CCL has advocated for is called the Big Wires Act; it would require each region of the country to build more transmission lines connecting to their neighboring regions. A new report from MIT found that big wires would bring a lot of benefits, it would reduce climate and air pollution by allowing more clean solar and wind energy to be built and connected to the grid. It would reduce costs by allowing regions to share that cheap, clean energy with their neighbors. And it would also reduce blackouts by allowing regions to import extra electricity from their neighbors when their own power plants go down.
Dana Nuccitelli 26:32
For example, due to an extreme weather event, passing the Big Wires Act would be a great situation for the country. It’s also important that in the process of streamlining permitting, we don’t cut out the input of communities that will be directly affected by these infrastructure projects. But by taking steps to improve early community involvement, we can actually reduce overall project timelines by avoiding the need for time-consuming lawsuits. We just need to make sure that permanent reform is done right. And that’s what CCL is working on. I’m Dana Nuccitelli. With the nerd corner. Thank you for being curious and for your commitment to climate progress. To join the discussion about climate science, technology, Economics, and Policy with the CCL research team, check out the nerd corner at CCL usa.org/nerd-corner That CCL usa.org/nerd-corner I hope to see you there.
Peterson Toscano 27:30
Thanks so much, Dana. If you have a question for Dana, email us radio @ citizens climate.org. We will make sure he gets it. Visit CCL usa.org/nerd.corner to see the chart of the week, regular blog posts, and an active forum where you can connect with other nerds.
Peterson Toscano 27:57
Now it’s time for our good news story with Horace Mo.
Horace Mo 28:04
Hi, this is your one and only Chinese correspondent, Horace, speaking. Today’s good news comes from China. Yes, you heard it right. The largest emitter of carbon dioxide in the world just released its first carbon trading regulations. It is a groundbreaking step for China to regulate its national emissions trading system aka the ETS. Now, a little historical background about the ETS for you, the ETS was officially launched back in 2021. To reduce emissions from the power sector.
Horace Mo 28:42
The ETS emerged more than 15 years after the European Union launched the world’s first international carbon trading market. So late to the carbon trading party, the ETS will likely become the largest carbon trading market in the world. In my opinion, the newly released carbon trading regulation functions in two important ways. First, it designates the Ministry of Ecology and Environment to supervise ETS; the ministry will set a carbon emission threshold for electricity generation companies and create a plan to allocate emission allowances. Second and most importantly, the regulation will increase the violation penalties.
Horace Mo 29:22
The minimum penalty will start at 500 South, and the Chinese yen will really isolated. I mean, the numbers sound a lot, right? Well, it actually cost 70,000 US dollars. For a big electricity generation company. This is not much but if the company got caught in violation, it must forfeit all illegal gains. The company will also be fined between five and 10 times those gains. Under this mechanism, the number will surely rise high. The Chinese carbon trading regulation will go into effect starting May 1, 2024.
Horace Mo 29:59
While hearing so many promising aspects about the regulation like me, you might ponder the loopholes within the ETs that the regulation does not address. Currently, the ETS only covers electricity generation companies. Ultimately, though, the plan is to include companies from other heavily emitting sectors. In addition, there is still uncertainty about how China’s national emissions trading system could be fully implemented. If the program fails to deliver its promise, the consequences might curb China’s progress in slashing national carbon emissions. But, in general, this first carbon trading regulation sets a milestone for China’s effort in addressing climate change. The regulation manifests China’s determination to achieve its dual carbon goals, that is, to peak carbon dioxide emissions by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060. Therefore, with more years to come, let us hope and believe that China will fulfill its grand carbon goals and help the world shift to a greener future.
Peterson Toscano 31:16
Thank you, Horace. If you want to share a good news story with us, please email radio at citizens climate.org That’s radio at citizens climate.org.
Peterson Toscano 31:28
We’ve been talking about roles, and what role you play I play in this climate work. And you may be thinking, you know what I need to deepen my climate work. If you’re looking for action steps visit our action page at CCL usa.org/action. In our show notes, or is put together an excellent list of other action steps you might consider. We also have some personality quizzes, a full transcript of today’s show, and much more. Visit CCL usa.org/radio, CCL usa.org/radio.
Peterson Toscano 32:05
Next month, Elizabeth Rush, author of The Quickening Creation and Community at the Ends of the Earth, will tell us about her 52-day voyage in Antarctica. Brett Cease from CCL will chime in to tell us about the sights, sounds, and disgusting smells he experienced on his trip to Antarctica. Plus, you will hear the story of an artist who worked with hundreds of children to create a life-sized whale made out of plastic bags. They successfully connected that art project to propose a ban on plastic shopping bags. Stay tuned for next month’s episode. It’s episode 94.
Peterson Toscano 32:46
Thank you so much for joining me, Erica, and Horace for this episode of Citizens’ Climate Radio. Many thanks to everyone who has been reposting what we share on social media. In fact, I will give a shout-out to some faithful followers. Many thanks to the following CCL chapters: Silicon Valley North San Diego, Boulder, Colorado, and CCL Arkansas. Thanks also to James Bradford, the third America’s future Michael Cooper, and the group known as 1.5.
Peterson Toscano 33:17
You can follow us on Instagram, X, LinkedIn, Facebook, and TikTok, and feel free to repost anything you see. We’re very happy when that happens. Our listener voicemail line is 619-512-9846 plus one if you’re calling from outside the USA. That number again is 619-512-9646
Peterson Toscano 33:43
This episode of Citizens’ Climate Radio has been written and produced by me, Peterson Toscano, and the CCR team. Horace Mo, Erica Valdez and Dana Nuccitelli. Other technical support comes from Ricky Bradley and Brett Cease. Social Media assistance comes from Flannery Winchester. Moral support comes from Madeline Para, who just had a birthday. The music on today’s show comes from epidemicsound.com.
Peterson Toscano 34:11
Please share Citizens’ Climate Radio with your friends and your followers. Visit CCL usa.org/radio. To see our show notes and find links to our guests. Citizens’ Climate Radio is a project of Citizens’ Climate Education.
The post Episode 93: What is Your Climate Change Role? appeared first on Citizens' Climate Lobby.
Greenhouse Gases
Our Fix Our Forests advocacy in 2025
Our Fix Our Forests advocacy in 2025
By Elissa Tennant
Healthy forests are a key part of the climate puzzle — and they’ve been a big part of our advocacy in 2025!
In January of this year, CCL volunteers sent 7,100 messages to Congress urging them to work together to reduce wildfire risk. Soon after, the Fix Our Forests Act was introduced in the House as H.R. 471 and passed the House by a bipartisan vote of 279–141.
At our Conservative Climate Conference and Lobby Day in March, we raised the Fix Our Forests Act as a secondary ask in 47 lobby meetings on Capitol Hill. The next month, an improved version of the bill was then introduced in the Senate as S. 1462 and referred to the Senate Agriculture Committee.
The bill was scheduled for a committee vote in October. CCLers placed more than 2,000 calls to senators on the committee and generated a flurry of local media in their states before the vote. In October, the bill passed the Senate Agriculture Committee with strong bipartisan support.
It’s clear that this legislation has momentum! As the Fix Our Forests Act now awaits a floor vote in the Senate, let’s take a look back at our 2025 advocacy efforts to advance this bill — and why it’s so important.
Protecting forests and improving climate outcomes
Wildfires are getting worse. In the U.S., the annual area burned by wildfires has more than doubled over the past 30 years. In California alone, the acreage burned by wildfires every year has more than tripled over the past 40 years.
American forests currently offset 12% of our annual climate pollution, with the potential to do even more. We need to take action to reduce wildfire, so forests can keep doing their important work pulling climate pollution out of the atmosphere.
The bipartisan Fix Our Forests Act:
- Protects America’s forests by supporting time-tested tools, like prescribed fire and reforestation, that make our forests healthy and able to better withstand and recover from severe wildfire and other extreme weather.
- Protects communities across the nation by reducing wildfire risks to people, homes, and water supplies and adopting new technologies.
- Protects livelihoods by supporting rural jobs and recreation areas and sustaining the forests that house and feed us.
CCL supports this bill alongside many organizations including American Forests, The Nature Conservancy, Environmental Defense Fund, National Audubon Society, The Western Fire Chiefs Association, The Federation of American Scientists and more.
A deeper dive into our efforts
All year long, CCL’s Government Relations staff has been in conversation with congressional offices to share CCL’s perspective on the legislation and understand the opportunities and challenges facing the bill. Our Government Relations team played a key role in helping us understand when and how to provide an extra grassroots push to keep the bill moving.
Starting Sept. 9 through the committee vote, CCLers represented by senators on the Senate Agriculture Committee made 2,022 calls to committee members in support of FOFA. CCL also signed a national coalition letter to Senate leadership in support of the bill, joining organizations like the American Conservation Coalition Action, Bipartisan Policy Center Action, the International Association of Fire Chiefs, and more.
In October, we launched a local media initiative in support of FOFA, focused on states with senators on the Agriculture Committee. Volunteers published letters to the editor and op-eds in California, Minnesota, Colorado, and more. In one state, the senator’s office saw a CCLer’s op-ed in the local newspaper, and reached out to schedule a meeting with those volunteers to discuss the bill! CCL’s Government Relations team joined in to make the most of the conversation.
As soon as the committee vote was scheduled for October 21, our Government Relations staff put out a call for volunteers to generate local endorsement letters from trusted messengers. CCL staff prepared short endorsement letter templates for each state that chapters could personalize and submit to their senator’s office. Each version included clear instructions, contact info, and space for volunteers to add their local context, like a short story or relevant example of how wildfires have impacted their area.
Then, CCL state coordinators worked with the CCL chapters in their states to make sure they prepared and sent the signed letters to the appropriate senate office, and to alert CCL’s Government Affairs staff so they could follow up and keep the conversation going on Capitol Hill.
Individually, our voices as climate advocates struggle to break through and make change. But it’s this kind of coordinated nationwide effort, with well-informed staff partnering with motivated local volunteers, that makes CCL effective at moving the needle in Congress.
On October 21, the Fix Our Forests Act officially passed the Senate Agriculture Committee with a vote of 18-5.
Building on the momentum
After committee passage, FOFA is now waiting to be taken up by the full Senate for a floor vote. It’s not clear yet if it will move as a standalone bill or included in a package of other legislation.
But to continue building support, we spent a large portion of our Fall Conference training our volunteers on the latest information about the bill, and we included FOFA as a primary ask in our Fall Lobby Week meetings.
Volunteers are now messaging all senators in support of FOFA. If you haven’t already, add your voice by sending messages to your senators about this legislation. With strategy, organization, and a group of dedicated people, we can help pass the Fix Our Forests Act, reducing wildfire risk and helping forests remove more climate pollution.
Help us keep the momentum going! Write to your Senator in support of the Fix Our Forests Act.
The post Our Fix Our Forests advocacy in 2025 appeared first on Citizens' Climate Lobby.
Greenhouse Gases
DeBriefed 5 December: Deadly Asia floods; Adaptation finance target examined; Global south IPCC scientists speak out
Welcome to Carbon Brief’s DeBriefed.
An essential guide to the week’s key developments relating to climate change.
This week
Deadly floods in Asia
MOUNTING DEVASTATION: The Associated Press reported that the death toll from catastrophic floods in south-east Asia had reached 1,500, with Indonesia, Sri Lanka and Thailand most affected and hundreds still missing. The newswire said “thousands” more face “severe” food and clean-water shortages. Heavy rains and thunderstorms are expected this weekend, it added, with “saturated soil and swollen rivers leaving communities on edge”. Earlier in the week, Bloomberg said the floods had caused “at least $20bn in losses”.
CLIMATE CHANGE LINKS: A number of outlets have investigated the links between the floods and human-caused climate change. Agence France-Presse explained that climate change was “producing more intense rain events because a warmer atmosphere holds more moisture and warmer oceans can turbocharge storms”. Meanwhile, environmental groups told the Associated Press the situation had been exacerbated by “decades of deforestation”, which had “stripped away natural defenses that once absorbed rainfall and stabilised soil”.
‘NEW NORMAL’: The Associated Press quoted Malaysian researcher Dr Jemilah Mahmood saying: “South-east Asia should brace for a likely continuation and potential worsening of extreme weather in 2026 and for many years.” Al Jazeera reported that the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies had called for “stronger legal and policy frameworks to protect people in disasters”. The organisation’s Asia-Pacific director said the floods were a “stark reminder that climate-driven disasters are becoming the new normal”, the outlet said.
Around the world
- REVOKED: The UK and Netherlands withdrew $2.2bn of financial backing from a controversial liquified natural gas (LNG) project in Mozambique, Reuters reported. The Guardian noted that TotalEnergies’ “giant” project stood accused of “fuelling the climate crisis and deadly terror attacks”.
- REVERSED: US president Donald Trump announced plans to “significantly weaken” Biden-era fuel efficiency requirements for cars, the New York Times said.
- RESTRICTED: EU leaders agreed to ban the import of Russian gas from autumn 2027, the Financial Times reported. Meanwhile, Reuters said it is “likely” the European Commission will delay announcing a plan on auto sector climate targets next week, following pressure to “weaken” a 2035 cut-off for combustion engines.
- RETRACTED: An influential Nature study that looked at the economic consequences of climate change has been withdrawn after “criticism from peers”, according to Bloomberg. [The research came second in Carbon Brief’s ranking of the climate papers most covered by the media in 2024.]
- REBUKED: The federal government of Canada faced a backlash over an oil pipeline deal struck last week with the province of Alberta. CBC News noted that First Nations chiefs voted “unanimously” to demand the withdrawal of the deal and Canada’s National Observer quoted author Naomi Klein as saying that the prime minister was “completely trashing Canada’s climate commitments”.
- RESCHEDULED: The Indonesian government has cancelled plans to close a coal plant seven years early, Bloomberg reported. Meanwhile, Bloomberg separately reported that India is mulling an “unprecedented increase” in coal-power capacity that could see plants built “until at least 2047”.
$518 billion a year
The projected coastal flood damages for the Asia-Pacific region by 2100 if current policies continue, according to a Scientific Reports study covered this week by Carbon Brief.
Latest climate research
- More than 100 “climate-sensitive rivers” worldwide are experiencing “large and severe changes in streamflow volume and timing” | Environmental Research Letters
- Africa’s forests have switched from a carbon sink into a source | Scientific Reports
- Increasing urbanisation can “substantially intensify warming”, contributing up to 0.44C of additional temperature rise per year through 2060 | Communications Earth & Environment
(For more, see Carbon Brief’s in-depth daily summaries of the top climate news stories on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday.)
Captured

A new target for developed nations to triple adaptation finance by 2035, agreed at the COP30 climate summit, would not cover more than a third of developing countries’ estimated needs, Carbon Brief analysis showed. The chart above compares a straight line to meeting the adaptation finance target (blue), alongside an estimate of countries’ adaptation needs (grey), which was calculated using figures from the latest UN Environmental Programme adaptation gap report, which were based on countries’ UN climate plans (called “nationally determined contributions” or NDCs) and national adaptation plans (NAPs).
Spotlight
Inclusivity at the IPCC
This week, Carbon Brief speaks to an IPCC lead author researching ways to improve the experience of global south scientists taking part in producing the UN climate body’s assessments.
Hundreds of climate scientists from around the world met in Paris this week to start work on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC’s) newest set of climate reports.
The IPCC is the UN body responsible for producing the world’s most authoritative climate science reports. Hundreds of scientists from across the globe contribute to each “assessment cycle”, which sees researchers aim to condense all published climate science over several years into three “working group” reports.
The reports inform the decisions of governments – including at UN climate talks – as well as the public understanding of climate change.
The experts gathering in Paris are the most diverse group ever convened by the IPCC.
Earlier this year, Carbon Brief analysis found that – for the first time in an IPCC cycle – citizens of the global south make up 50% of authors of the three working group reports. The IPCC has celebrated this milestone, with IPCC chair Prof Jim Skea touting the seventh assessment report’s (AR7’s) “increased diversity” in August.
But some IPCC scientists have cautioned that the growing involvement of global south scientists does not translate into an inclusive process.
“What happens behind closed doors in these meeting rooms doesn’t necessarily mirror what the diversity numbers say,” Dr Shobha Maharaj, a Trinidadian climate scientist who is a coordinating lead author for working group two (WG2) of AR7, told Carbon Brief.
Global south perspective
Motivated by conversations with colleagues and her own “uncomfortable” experience working on the small-islands chapter of the sixth assessment cycle (AR6) WG2 report, Maharaj – an adjunct professor at the University of Fiji – reached out to dozens of fellow contributors to understand their experience.
The exercise, she said, revealed a “dominance of thinking and opinions from global north scientists, whereas the global south scientists – the scientists who were people of colour – were generally suppressed”.
The perspectives of scientists who took part in the survey and future recommendations for the IPCC are set out in a peer-reviewed essay – co-authored by 20 researchers – slated for publication in the journal PLOS Climate. (Maharaj also presented the findings to the IPCC in September.)
The draft version of the essay notes that global south scientists working on WG2 in AR6 said they confronted a number of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) issues, including “skewed” author selection, “unequal” power dynamics and a “lack of respect and trust”. The researchers also pointed to logistical constraints faced by global south authors, such as visa issues and limited access to journals.
The anonymous quotations from more than 30 scientists included in the essay, Maharaj said, are “clear data points” that she believes can advance a discussion about how to make academia more inclusive.
“The literature is full of the problems that people of colour or global south authors have in academia, but what you don’t find very often is quotations – especially from climate scientists,” she said. “We tend to be quite a conservative bunch.”
Road to ‘improvement’
Among the recommendations set out in the essay are for DEI training, the appointment of a “diversity and inclusion ombudsman” and for updated codes of conduct.
Marharaj said that these “tactical measures” need to occur alongside “transformative approaches” that help “address value systems, dismantle power structures [and] change the rules of participation”.
With drafting of the AR7 reports now underway, Maharaj said she is “hopeful” the new cycle can be an improvement on the last, pointing to a number of “welcome” steps from the IPCC.
This includes holding the first-ever expert meeting on DEI this autumn, new mechanisms where authors can flag concerns and the recruitment of a “science and capacity officer” to support WG2 authors.
The hope, Maharaj explained, is to enhance – not undermine – climate science.
“The idea here was to move forward and to improve the IPCC, rather than attack it,” she said. “Because we all love the science – and we really value what the IPCC brings to the world.”
Watch, read, listen
BROKEN PROMISES: Climate Home News spoke to communities in Nigeria let down by the government’s failure to clean up oil spills by foreign companies.
‘WHEN A ROAD GOES WRONG’: Inside Climate News looked at how a new road from Brazil’s western Amazon to Peru has become a “conduit for rampant deforestation and illegal gold mining”.
SHADOWY COURTS: In the Guardian, George Monbiot lamented the rise of investor-state dispute settlements, which he described as “undemocratic offshore tribunals” that are already having a “chilling effect” on countries’ climate ambitions.
Coming up
- 1-12 December: UN Environment Assembly 7, Nairobi, Kenya
- 7 December: Hong Kong legislative elections
- 11 December: Falkland Islands legislative assembly elections
Pick of the jobs
- Greenpeace International, engagement manager – climate and energy | Salary: Unknown. Location: Various
- The Energy, newsletter editor | Salary: Unknown. Location: Australia (remote)
- University of Groningen, PhD position in motivating people to contribute to societal transitions | Salary: €3,059-€3,881 per month. Location: Groningen, the Netherlands
DeBriefed is edited by Daisy Dunne. Please send any tips or feedback to debriefed@carbonbrief.org.
This is an online version of Carbon Brief’s weekly DeBriefed email newsletter. Subscribe for free here.
The post DeBriefed 5 December: Deadly Asia floods; Adaptation finance target examined; Global south IPCC scientists speak out appeared first on Carbon Brief.
Greenhouse Gases
Cropped 3 December 2025: Extreme weather in Africa; COP30 roundup; Saudi minister interview
We handpick and explain the most important stories at the intersection of climate, land, food and nature over the past fortnight.
This is an online version of Carbon Brief’s fortnightly Cropped email newsletter. Subscribe for free here.
Key developments
COP30 roundup
FOOD OFF THE MENU: COP30 wrapped up in the Brazilian Amazon city of Belém, with several new announcements for forest protection, but with experts saying that food systems were seemingly “erased” from official negotiations, Carbon Brief reported. Other observers told the Independent that the lack of mention of food in some of the main negotiated outcomes was “surprising” and “deeply disappointing”. The outlet noted that smallholder farmers spend an “estimated 20 to 40% of their annual income on adaptive measures…despite having done next to nothing to contribute to the climate crisis”.
‘BITTERSWEET’: Meanwhile, Reuters said that the summit’s outcomes for trees and Indigenous peoples were “unprecedented”, but “bittersweet”. It noted that countries had “unlocked billions in new funds for forests” through the Tropical Forest Forever Facility. (For more on that fund, see Carbon Brief’s explainer.) However, the newswire added, “nations failed to agree on a plan to keep trees standing as they have repeatedly promised to do in recent summits”. Mongabay noted that pledges to the new forest fund totalled “less than a quarter of the $25bn initially required for a full-scale rollout”.
‘MIXED OUTCOMES’: A separate piece in Mongabay said that COP30 “delivered mixed outcomes” for Indigenous peoples. One positive outcome was a “historic pledge to recognise Indigenous land tenure rights over 160m hectares” of tropical forest land, the outlet said. This was accompanied by a monetary pledge of $1.8bn to support “Indigenous peoples, local and Afro-descendant communities in securing land rights over the next five years”, it added. However, Mongabay wrote, there were some “major disappointments” around the summit’s outcomes, particularly around the absence of mention of critical minerals and fossil-fuel phaseout in the final texts.
Africa on edge
SOMALIA DROUGHT: Somalia officially declared a drought emergency last month “after four consecutive failed rainy seasons left millions at risk of hunger and displacement”, allAfrica reported, with 130,000 people in “immediate life-threatening need”. According to Al Jazeera, more than 4.5 million people “face starvation”, as “failed rains and heat devastated” the country, with displaced communities also “escaping fighting” in their villages and aid cuts impacting relief. Down to Earth, meanwhile, covered an Amnesty International report that demonstrated that Somalia failed to “implement a functional social-security system for the marginalised, particularly those negatively affected by drought”.
COCOA CRASH: Ivory Coast’s main cocoa harvest is expected to “decline sharply for [the] third consecutive year” due to erratic rainfall, crop disease, ageing farms and poor investment, Reuters reported. Africa Sustainability Matters observed that the delayed implementation of the EU’s deforestation law – announced last week – could impact two million smallholder farmers, who may see “delays in certification processes ripple through payment cycles and export volumes”. Meanwhile, SwissInfo reported that the “disconnect between high global cocoa prices and the price paid to farmers” is leading to “unprecedented cocoa smuggling” in Ghana.
‘FERTILISER CRISIS’: Nyasa Times reported that, “for the first time”, Malawian president Peter Mutharika admitted that the country is “facing a planting season…for which his government is dangerously unprepared”. According to the paper, Mutharika acknowledged that the country is “heading into the rains without adequate fertiliser and with procurement dangerously behind schedule” at a meeting with the International Monetary Fund’s Africa director. “We are struggling with supplies… We are not yet ready in terms of fertiliser,” Mutharika is quoted as saying, with the paper adding that his administration is “overwhelmed” by a fertiliser crisis.
News and views
PLANT TALKS COLLAPSE: “Decade-long” talks aimed at negotiating new rules for seed-sharing “collapsed” after week-long negotiations in Lima, Euractiv reported. The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture allows “any actor to access seed samples of 64 major food crops stored in public gene banks”, but “virtually no money flows back to countries that conserve and share seed diversity”, the outlet said. Observers “criticised the closed-door nature of the final talks”, which attempted to postpone a decision on payments until 2027, it added.
UNSUSTAINABLE: The UK food system is driving nature loss and deepening climate change, according to a new WWF report. The report analysed the impacts on nature, climate and people of 10 UK retailers representing 90% of the domestic grocery market. Most of the retailers committed in 2021 to halving the environmental impact of the UK grocery market by 2030. However, the report found that the retailers are “a long way off” on reducing their emissions and sourcing products from deforestation-free areas.
GREY CARBON: A “flurry” of carbon-credit deals “covering millions of hectares of landmass” across Africa struck by United Arab Emirates-based firm Blue Carbon on the sidelines of COP28 “have gone nowhere”, according to a joint investigation by Agence-France Presse and Code for Africa. In Zimbabwe – where the deal included “about 20% of the country’s landmass” – national climate change authorities said that the UAE company’s memorandum of understanding “lapsed without any action”. AFP attempted multiple ways to contact Blue Carbon, but received no reply. Meanwhile, research covered by New Scientist found that Africa’s forests “are now emitting more CO2 than they absorb”.
UK NATURE: The UK government released an updated “environmental improvement plan” to help England “meet numerous legally binding goals” for environmental restoration, BusinessGreen reported. The outlet added that it included measures such as creating “wildlife-rich habitats” and boosting tree-planting. Elsewhere, a study covered by the Times found that England and Wales lost “almost a third of their grasslands” in the past 90 years. The main causes of grassland decline were “increased mechanisation on farms, new agrochemicals and crop-growing”, the Times said.
IN DANGER: The Trump administration proposed changes to the US Endangered Species Act that “could clear the way for more oil drilling, logging and mining” in key species habitats, reported the New York Times. This act is the “bedrock environmental law intended to prevent animal and plant extinctions”, the newspaper said, adding that one of the proposals could make it harder to protect species from future threats, such as the effects of climate change. It added: “Environmental groups are expected to challenge the proposals in court once they are finalised.”
‘ALREADY OVERSTRETCHED’: Producing enough food to feed the world’s growing population by 2050 “will place additional pressure on the world’s already overstretched” resources, according to the latest “state of the world’s land and water resources” report from the UN Food and Agriculture Organization. The report said that degradation of agricultural lands is “creating unprecedented pressure on the world’s agrifood systems”. It also found that urban areas have “more than doubled in size in just two decades”, consuming 24m hectares “of some of the most fertile croplands” in the process.
Spotlight
Saudi minister interviewed
During the second week of COP30 in Belém, Carbon Brief’s Daisy Dunne conducted a rare interview with a Saudi Arabian minister.
Dr Osama Faqeeha is deputy environment minister for Saudi Arabia and chief adviser to the COP16 presidency on desertification.
Carbon Brief: Thank you very much for agreeing to this interview. You represent the Saudi Arabia COP16 presidency on desertification. What are your priorities for linking desertification, biodiversity and climate change at COP30?
Dr Osama Faqeeha: First of all, our priority is to really highlight the linkages – the natural linkage – between land, climate and biodiversity. These are all interconnected, natural pillars for Earth. We need to pursue actions on the three together. In this way, we can achieve multiple goals. We can achieve climate resilience, we can protect biodiversity and we can stop land degradation. And this will really give us multiple benefits – food security, water security, climate resilience, biodiversity and social goals.
CB: Observers have accused Saudi Arabia, acting on behalf of the Arab group, of blocking an ambitious outcome on a text on synergies between climate change and biodiversity loss, under the item on cooperation with international organisations. [See Carbon Brief’s full explanation.] What is your response?
OF: We support synergies in the action plans. We support synergies in the financial flows. We support synergies in the political [outcome]. What we don’t support is trying to reduce all of the conventions. We don’t support dissolving the conventions. We need a climate convention, we need a biodiversity convention and we need a desertification convention. There was this incident, but the discussion continued after that and has been clarified. We support synergies. We oppose dissolution. This way we dilute the issues. No. This is a challenge. But we don’t have to address them separately. We need to address them in a comprehensive way so that we can really have a win-win situation.
CB: But as the president of the COP16 talks on desertification, surely more close work on the three Rio conventions would be a priority for you?
OF: First of all, we have to realise the convention is about land. Preventing land degradation and combating drought. These are the two major challenges.

CB: We’re at COP30 now and we’re at a crucial point in the negotiations where a lot of countries have been calling for a roadmap away from fossil fuels. What is Saudi Arabia’s position on agreeing to a roadmap away from fossil fuels?
OF: I think the issue is the emissions, it’s not the fuel. And our position is that we have to cut emissions regardless. In Saudi Arabia, in our nationally determined contribution [NDC], we doubled [the 2030 emissions reductions target] – from 130MtCO2 to 278MtCO2 – on a voluntary basis. So we are very serious about cutting emissions.
CB: The presidency said that some countries see the fossil-fuel roadmap as a red line. Is Saudi Arabia seeing a fossil-fuel roadmap as a red line for agreement in the negotiations?
OF: I think people try to put pressure on the negotiation to go in one way or another. And I think we should avoid that because, trying to demonise a country, that’s not good. Saudi Arabia is a signatory to the Paris Agreement. Saudi Arabia made the Paris Agreement possible. We are committed to the Paris Agreement.
[Carbon Brief obtained the “informal list” of countries that opposed a fossil-fuel roadmap at COP30, which included Saudi Arabia.]
CB: You mention that you feel sometimes the media demonises Saudi Arabia. So could you clarify, what do you hope to be Saudi Arabia’s role in guiding the negotiations to conclusion here at this COP?
OF: I think we have to realise that there is common but differentiated responsibilities. We have developed countries and developing countries. We have to realise that this is very well established in the convention. We can reach the same end point, but with different pathways. And this is what the negotiation is all about. It’s not one size fits all. What works with a certain country may not work with another country. So, I think people misread the negotiations. We, as Saudi Arabia, officially announced that we will reach carbon neutrality by 2060 – and we are putting billions and billions of dollars to reach this goal. But it doesn’t mean that we agree on everything. On every idea. We agree to so many things, you never hear that. Saudi Arabia agrees on one thousand points and we disagree on one point, then suddenly it becomes the news. Now, why does the media do that? Maybe that gives them more attention. I don’t know. But all I can tell you is that Saudi Arabia is part of the process. Saudi Arabia is making the process work.
This interview has been edited for length.
Watch, read, listen
NEW CHALLENGE: CNN discussed the environmental impacts of AI usage and how scientists are using it to conserve biodiversity.
AMAZON COP: In the Conversation, researchers argued that hosting COP30 in the Amazon made the “realities of climate and land-use change jarringly obvious” and Indigenous voices “impossible to ignore”.
DUBIOUS CLAIMS: DeSmog investigated an EU-funded “campaign blitz” that “overstated the environmental benefits of eating meat and dairy, while featuring bizarre and misleading claims”.
WASP’S NEST: In a talk for the Leverhulme Centre for Nature Recovery, Prof Seirian Sumner explained the “natural capital” of wasps and why it is important to “love the unlovable parts of nature”.
New science
- Climate change can “exacerbate” the abundance and impacts of plastic pollution on terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems | Frontiers in Science
- The North Sea region accounts for more than 20% of peatland-related emissions within the EU, UK, Norway and Iceland, despite accounting for just 4% of the region’s peatland area | Nature Communications
- Economic damages from climate-related disasters in the Brazilian Amazon rose 370% over 2000-22, with farming experiencing more than 60% of total losses | Nature Communications
In the diary
- 1-5 December: Meeting of the implementation review committee of the UN desertification convention | Panama City
- 2-5 December: Meeting of the contracting parties to the Barcelona Convention on the protection of the Mediterranean Sea | Cairo
- 5 December: World soil day
- 8-12 December: International Water Association water and development congress and exhibition | Bangkok
Cropped is researched and written by Dr Giuliana Viglione, Aruna Chandrasekhar, Daisy Dunne, Orla Dwyer and Yanine Quiroz. Ayesha Tandon also contributed to this issue. Please send tips and feedback to cropped@carbonbrief.org
The post Cropped 3 December 2025: Extreme weather in Africa; COP30 roundup; Saudi minister interview appeared first on Carbon Brief.
Cropped 3 December 2025: Extreme weather in Africa; COP30 roundup; Saudi minister interview
-
Climate Change4 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases4 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Spanish-language misinformation on renewable energy spreads online, report shows
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Why airlines are perfect targets for anti-greenwashing legal action




