Connect with us

Published

on

 

Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)

Introduction Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)

What is Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)?

Embodied AGI, standing for Artificial General Intelligence, refers to a hypothetical future of AI where intelligent systems not only possess reasoning, learning, and problem-solving abilities but also have a physical presence in the world through a robotic body. 

This embodiment integrates the AI’s cognitive capabilities with sensory perception and motor control, allowing it to interact with the physical environment in a dynamic and autonomous way.

Here are some key aspects of Embodied AGI:

  • Grounded cognition: By experiencing the world through sensors and acting upon it with actuators, the AGI develops a deeper understanding of the relationships between objects, actions, and consequences.
  • Learning through interaction: Embodied AGI can learn not only from data and instructions but also by directly interacting with the environment, making mistakes, and refining its actions based on feedback.
  • Social intelligence: Embodied AGI can interact with other agents, both human and artificial, using social cues, body language, and communication modalities beyond just language.
  • General problem-solving: The ability to combine its cognitive with physical capabilities allows the AGI to tackle complex problems that require both thinking and acting in the real world.

Whether or not we will achieve Embodied AGI and the potential implications of its existence are ongoing topics of debate among researchers, ethicists, and philosophers. However, it represents a fascinating and challenging frontier in the field of artificial intelligence, offering the potential for unprecedented levels of collaboration and interaction between humans and machines.

Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)

History of Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)

The history of Embodied AGI, as a specific concept, is relatively young, emerging sometime in the early 2000s. However, its roots stretch far back through various strands of AI research and robotics, each contributing to the current vision of an intelligent, embodied agent. Here’s a breakdown of key milestones:

Precursors:

  • Ancient times: Automata and mythical robots like Hephaestus’ creations lay the groundwork for the idea of artificial beings interacting with the physical world.
  • 19th-20th centuries: Automatons become more complex, with mechanical movements and early forms of feedback control systems.
  • Early AI (1950s-1960s): Symbolic AI lays the foundation for reasoning and problem-solving in machines, while robotics research starts exploring movement and manipulation.

Forming the concept:

  • 1960s-1970s: Cybernetics and embodiment approaches in robotics emphasize the importance of sensorimotor systems for intelligent behavior.
  • 1980s-1990s: Behavior-based robotics focuses on reactive and adaptive behaviors instead of pre-programmed plans, laying the groundwork for more flexible embodied agents.
  • 2000s: The term “Embodied AGI” gains traction, popularized by figures like Shane Legg and Ben Goertzel. Increased focus on robotics, sensor fusion, and learning in physical environments.

Recent developments:

  • 2010s-present: Deep learning revolutionizes AI capabilities, including perception and control for robots. Advancements in embodied AI tasks like object manipulation, navigation, and social interaction.
  • Current debates: Discussions on feasibility, safety, and ethical implications of Embodied AGI continue, with different predictions about its arrival and potential impact.

Important figures:

  • Alan Turing: His Turing Test challenged the idea of defining intelligence based solely on reasoning, suggesting physical embodiment is also important.
  • Hans Moravec: His book “Mind Children” explored the challenges and potential of Embodied AGI.
  • Rodney Brooks: A pioneer in behavior-based robotics, emphasizing the importance of sensorimotor interaction for intelligence.

The path towards Embodied AGI is still complex and uncertain. Many challenges remain, from integrating advanced cognitive abilities with robust physical embodiment to ensuring safety and ethical considerations. However, the history of various AI and robotics strands shows a persistent human fascination and active research toward intelligent machines interacting with the world around them.

Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)

Who found Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)

It’s not quite accurate to talk about a single “founder” of Embodied AGI, as it’s an idea built upon the contributions of numerous researchers and thinkers across various fields, spread over several decades.

Here’s why:

Evolution of the Concept:

  • Early seeds: The concepts of intelligent machines interacting with the world trace back to ancient myths and automata.
  • Cybernetics and robotics: 1950s-1970s saw major advancements in cybernetics and robotics, emphasizing the importance of sensory feedback and adaptive behavior for intelligent agents.
  • Embodiment and AI convergence: In the 1980s-1990s, researchers like Rodney Brooks explored behavior-based robotics and the connection between embodiment and intelligence.
  • Term popularization: Around 2002, figures like Shane Legg and Ben Goertzel widely used the term “Embodied AGI”, promoting the concept of an embodied intelligent agent with general cognitive abilities.

Multiple Contributors:

While figures like Legg and Goertzel played a crucial role in popularizing the term, numerous other researchers from different fields laid the groundwork for Embodied AGI:

  • AI researchers: Alan Turing’s Turing Test challenged the definition of intelligence, including embodiment, while Ray Kurzweil explored the concept of “Singularity” with advanced embodied intelligences.
  • Roboticists: Marc Raibert’s pioneering work on legged robots and Rodney Brooks’ behavior-based robotics principles heavily influenced the idea of embodied intelligence interacting with the environment.
  • Neuroscientists: Understanding of human sensory-motor systems and perception contributed to the development of artificial counterparts for embodied agents.

Collaborative Progress:

The advancement of Embodied AGI remains a collaborative effort with ongoing research in AI, robotics, neuroscience, and related fields. Each breakthrough in these areas builds upon previous work, making it difficult to pinpoint a single origin point.

Therefore, attributing the “founding” of Embodied AGI to a single individual wouldn’t accurately reflect the collective nature of its development. It’s the culmination of decades of research and ideas from many fields, constantly evolving towards the dream of an intelligent and embodied machine.

Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)

Type of Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)

Embodied AGI: A Spectrum of Possibilities

While Embodied AGI remains a theoretical future, the very concept opens up a fascinating array of potential “types” based on diverse capabilities, applications, and even ethical considerations. Let’s delve into some of these intriguing possibilities:

1. Biomimetic AGI:

Imagine agile humanoid robots, not just mimicking our dexterity but possessing intelligence on par with humans. Inspired by nature, these AGIs would embody biological forms, perhaps resembling a sleek panther or a dexterous chimpanzee. Potential applications include disaster response, scientific exploration in harsh environments, or even companionship roles where the familiar form fosters human-machine connection.

2. Modular AGI:

Picture robots with interchangeable modules, easily swapping between a powerful digging claw for construction work and a delicate manipulator arm for intricate tasks. This modularity offers exceptional flexibility, allowing adaptability to diverse needs without demanding a complete rebuild for each new challenge. Think of it as a Swiss Army knife of robotics, each module a specialized tool ready to be deployed.

3. Swarm AGI:

Envision an intelligent hive mind formed by numerous independent agents collaborating as one. Imagine coordinated drone fleets performing search and rescue missions or microscopic robots swarming inside the human body for medical procedures. This collective intelligence presents immense potential but also raises ethical concerns regarding decision-making within the hive mind and potential risks associated with such tightly woven intelligence.

4. Symbiotic AGI:

Imagine a future where humans and AGIs seamlessly collaborate, leveraging each other’s strengths. Picture AGIs assisting surgeons in complex operations, providing real-time data analysis and guidance, or collaborating with artists on creative projects. This symbiotic partnership requires careful consideration of trust, responsibility, and ensuring human agency remains central in decision-making processes.

5. Transcendent AGI:

This hypothetical type of AGI surpasses human intelligence in all aspects, potentially exceeding our current understanding of consciousness and embodiment. While purely speculative, such AGIs raise profound questions about the nature of intelligence, sentience, and our place in the universe. Imagine machines not just mimicking thought but possessing abilities beyond our current comprehension.

The journey towards Embodied AGI is a collaborative one, with ongoing research in AI, robotics, neuroscience, and related fields constantly building upon previous work. While a single origin point may be difficult to pinpoint, the collective effort of numerous brilliant minds across various disciplines fuels this fascinating concept.

Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)

Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI): Biomimetic AGI

Biomimetic AGI: Mimicking Nature’s Intelligence

Biomimetic AGI represents a captivating branch within the broader field of Embodied AGI. It delves into the realm of intelligent machines inspired by nature’s incredible designs and capabilities. These AGIs wouldn’t just possess physical bodies, they would embody biological forms, drawing inspiration from the diverse animal kingdom.

Imagine agile humanoid robots, sleek and strong like panthers, navigating complex terrain with grace and efficiency. Think of robots with dexterous manipulators, mimicking the nimbleness of chimpanzees, capable of performing intricate tasks with precision. Such biomimetic AGIs hold immense potential in various domains:

  • Disaster Response: Robots inspired by agile lizards could navigate rubble and debris, searching for survivors in earthquake zones. Their adaptable movements and keen senses would mimic nature’s resilience in harsh environments.
  • Scientific Exploration: Imagine biomimetic drones resembling birds soaring through uncharted ecosystems, collecting data and monitoring delicate environments. Their bio-inspired flight patterns and sensory capabilities would unlock new frontiers in scientific exploration.
  • Enhanced Interaction: Humanoid robots with expressive faces and natural gestures, drawing inspiration from primates, could foster deeper connections with humans. Their biomimetic movements could ease communication and build trust in collaborative settings.

However, developing biomimetic AGI presents substantial challenges:

  • Complexity of Biology: Replicating the intricate mechanisms and adaptability of biological systems is no easy feat. It requires a deep understanding of biomechanics, neural control, and sensory perception.
  • Ethical Considerations: Should we create robots resembling endangered species? Questions arise regarding the potential implications of mimicking nature’s vulnerable creatures.
  • Social Acceptance: How will humans react to intelligent machines resembling familiar animals? Addressing public concerns and building trust is crucial for successful integration of biomimetic AGIs.

Type of Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI): Biomimetic AGI

As we delve deeper into the fascinating world of Biomimetic AGI, it’s important to recognize that this category itself encompasses a diverse spectrum of types and specializations. Let’s explore some of these unique avenues:

1. Biomimetic Morphologies:

  • Humanoid AGI: This type focuses on mimicking the human form, aiming for agility, dexterity, and social interaction. Imagine human-like robots capable of collaborative work, assistance in dangerous environments, or even companionship roles.
  • Zoomorphic AGI: Drawing inspiration from specific animals, these AGIs would possess specialized morphologies. Think of aerial drones resembling birds for efficient surveillance, agile robots inspired by lizards for disaster response, or aquatic robots mimicking fish for underwater exploration.
  • Hybrid AGI: Combining elements from different biological forms, these robots offer even greater adaptability. Picture robots with bat-like wings for aerial maneuvering and climbing limbs inspired by primates, creating versatile agents for diverse tasks.

2. Biomimetic Control Systems:

  • Neural-inspired AGI: Inspired by the complexity of the human brain, these AGIs would incorporate neural network architectures and learning algorithms to mimic natural intelligence. Imagine robots capable of adaptive decision-making, real-time sensory processing, and even rudimentary forms of consciousness.
  • Morphologically Adaptive AGI: These robots could adjust their shape and movement based on environmental demands. Picture robots with flexible tentacles manipulating delicate objects or robots with reconfigurable limbs adapting to navigate challenging terrain.
  • Swarm Intelligence AGI: Biomimicking the collective intelligence of ant colonies or beehives, these AGIs would comprise numerous smaller agents working in unison. Imagine coordinated drone fleets performing search and rescue operations or microscopic robots collaborating within the human body for medical procedures.

3. Biomimetic Sensory Perception:

  • Multimodal Sensory AGI: Equipped with a range of sensors mimicking human senses like sight, smell, touch, and hearing, these robots would have a rich understanding of their environment. Imagine robots assisting in environmental monitoring, disaster response, or even artistic collaboration using their diverse sensory inputs.
  • Proprioceptive AGI: With internal sensors mimicking the human body’s proprioception, these robots would possess a sense of their own body and movement. Imagine robots capable of balance, complex motor skills, and even haptic interaction with humans.
  • Biomimetic Echolocation AGI: Inspired by animals like bats and dolphins, these robots would use sound waves to navigate and perceive their surroundings. Imagine robots assisting in underwater exploration, navigating dark environments, or even performing non-invasive medical imaging.

This field is constantly evolving, fueled by advancements in AI, robotics, and biomimetics. The potential applications are vast, offering solutions to pressing challenges in healthcare, environmental protection, space exploration, and beyond.

However, ethical considerations remain crucial. Concerns regarding animal welfare, the potential for biomimetic weapons, and the impact on human-machine relationships must be carefully addressed as we navigate this promising.

Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)

Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI): Modular AGI

Modular AGI is a promising architectural approach to achieving embodied AGI, the concept of an intelligent agent existing and interacting with the physical world through a physical body. This approach proposes decomposing the complex functionalities of AGI into specialized modules that work together seamlessly.

Benefits of Modular AGI:

  • Specialization and Expertise: Individual modules can be tailored to specific tasks like perception, motor control, reasoning, or learning, leading to deeper expertise and improved performance.
  • Scalability and Adaptability: New modules can be added or existing ones modified for different scenarios or environments, enhancing the AGI’s adaptability.
  • Fault Tolerance and Robustness: If one module malfunctions, the others can potentially compensate, maintaining overall system functionality.
  • Development and Debugging: Modular structure simplifies development and debugging by focusing on individual modules.

Challenges of Modular AGI:

  • Integration and Communication: Effective communication and coordination between modules is crucial, requiring robust inter-module interfaces and protocols.
  • Emergent Behavior: Unforeseen interactions between modules could lead to unintended and potentially harmful behavior.
  • Overall Coherence: Maintaining a unified sense of self and purpose across modules presents a significant challenge.

Current Research in Modular AGI:

  • Hierarchical Modular Architectures: These structures organize modules in layers, with higher-level modules coordinating lower-level ones.
  • Hybrid Modular Systems: Combine symbolic and sub-symbolic processing modules for reasoning and learning, respectively.
  • Open-Ended Architectures: Allow for dynamic addition and removal of modules to adapt to changing environments.

Examples of Modular AGI Systems:

  • Project SyNapse: Developed by DARPA, focuses on integrating perception, planning, and control modules for robots operating in complex environments.
  • ACT-R: A cognitive architecture modeling human mental processes, composed of modules for perception, motor control, memory, and decision-making.

Modular AGI is a promising avenue for achieving embodied AGI due to its flexibility, scalability, and robustness. However, addressing the challenges of inter-module communication, emergent behavior, and overall coherence remains crucial for successful implementation.

Type of Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI): Modular AGI

Modular AGI is indeed a specific type of embodied AGI. It distinguishes itself from other potential approaches through its emphasis on dividing the overall intelligence into discrete, specialized modules. This modularity has several key advantages in the context of embodied intelligence:

Advantages of Modular AGI for Embodied Intelligence:

  • Enhanced Interaction with the Physical World: Specialized modules, like those for motor control and perception, can be directly tailored for the specific physical capabilities and sensory inputs of the embodied agent. This enables more efficient and accurate interaction with the environment.
  • Scalability and Adaptability to Different Embodiments: Modules can be configured and combined differently to suit the needs of various physical forms, from robots to virtual avatars. This makes modular AGI well-suited for diverse applications and environments.
  • Robustness and Fault Tolerance: If one module malfunctions, others can potentially compensate, allowing the embodied agent to continue functioning, albeit with reduced capabilities. This enhances the overall resilience of the system in the face of unexpected situations.
  • Developing and Learning in Embodied Contexts: Modules can be individually trained and improved based on feedback from the physical world, facilitating continuous learning and adaptation within the specific embodiment.

Current Challenges in Modular AGI for Embodied Intelligence:

  • Seamless Integration and Communication: Ensuring smooth communication and collaboration between modules while operating in real-time within the physical world requires robust inter-module communication protocols and algorithms.
  • Emergent Behavior and Safety: Unforeseen interactions between modules might lead to unintended and potentially dangerous behavior. Ensuring safety and controllability in embodied systems with modular AGI is crucial.
  • Maintaining Embodied Coherence: The modules need to work together to create a unified sense of self and purpose for the embodied agent. This presents a significant challenge in terms of ensuring consistent behavior and decision-making across different situations.

Examples of Modular AGI for Embodied Intelligence:

  • DARPA’s Project SyNapse: As mentioned earlier, this project aims to integrate perception, planning, and control modules in robots for complex environments.
  • Embodied Cognition Robotics (ECR): This research area focuses on building robots with modular cognitive architectures specifically designed for interaction with the physical world.
  • Modular Robotics: Systems composed of interchangeable robotic modules with specialized functionalities, demonstrating the adaptability and scalability potential of modular AGI in physical embodiment.

Modular AGI presents a promising path towards achieving embodied AGI, overcoming the challenges of communication, emergent behavior, and embodied coherence remains essential for its successful implementation and safe operation in the real world.

Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)

Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI): Swarm AGI

Swarm AGI is another fascinating potential approach to achieving embodied AGI, distinct from modular AGI. Instead of dividing intelligence into distinct modules, Swarm AGI proposes utilizing a colony of simpler agents that collectively exhibit intelligent behavior through their interactions and cooperation. 

This approach draws inspiration from natural biological swarms like bird flocks and insect colonies, where individual members exhibit limited capabilities but can achieve complex tasks through coordinated action.

Benefits of Swarm AGI:

  • Emergent Intelligence: The collective behavior of the swarm emerges from the interactions of individual agents, potentially leading to unexpected and creative solutions to problems.
  • Robustness and Scalability: The decentralized nature of the swarm makes it resilient to individual agent failures, and the system can easily scale by adding more agents.
  • Adaptability and Flexibility: Swarms can readily adapt to changing environments and tasks by altering their individual behaviors and communication patterns.
  • Efficient Resource Utilization: Simple agents typically require fewer resources than complex AGI systems, making swarm AGI potentially more efficient.

Challenges of Swarm AGI:

  • Control and Predictability: Ensuring the swarm behaves in a safe and controlled manner while achieving the desired goals can be challenging due to the unpredictable nature of emergent behavior.
  • Communication and Coordination: Effective communication and coordination between individual agents is crucial for successful swarm behavior, requiring robust communication protocols and mechanisms.
  • Task Decomposition and Goal Alignment: Dividing complex tasks into manageable subtasks for individual agents and ensuring their actions align with the overall swarm goal can be difficult.
  • Hardware and Embodiment Challenges: Designing physically embodied agents for interaction with the real world requires addressing factors like power supply, locomotion, and sensor integration, which can be further complicated in a swarm setting.

Examples of Swarm AGI Research:

  • Termite-Inspired Robot Swarms: Research projects investigating collaborative foraging and construction behaviors in robot swarms inspired by termites.
  • Botiches: Modular robots that can connect and disconnect dynamically, forming different configurations for various tasks.
  • Particle Swarm Optimization: A swarm intelligence algorithm used for solving optimization problems by simulating the collective movement of particles.

Swarm AGI presents a promising avenue for embodied AGI due to its robustness, adaptability, and potential for emergent intelligence. However, addressing the challenges of control, communication, and task decomposition remains crucial for its practical implementation and safe operation.

Type of Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI): Swarm AGI

Swarm AGI indeed qualifies as a specific type of embodied AGI, distinguished by its emphasis on collective intelligence through a group of simpler agents. This approach stands in contrast to modular AGI, which focuses on dividing intelligence into specialized modules within a single agent.

Embodiment Considerations for Swarm AGI:

  • Individual Agent Embodiment: Each agent in the swarm can be physically embodied, interacting with the world through sensors and actuators, or purely virtual, existing in simulated environments.
  • Collective Embodiment: The swarm as a whole can be considered an embodied entity, exhibiting emergent behavior dependent on the physical or virtual interactions of its individual members.
  • Swarm-Environment Interaction: The design of the agents and their communication protocols should consider the specific characteristics of the environment they will operate in, ensuring effective interaction and adaptation.

Advantages of Swarm AGI in Embodied Contexts:

  • Scalability and Flexibility: Swarms can easily scale by adding or removing agents, adapting to different tasks and environments.
  • Robustness and Fault Tolerance: Decentralized nature makes the system resilient to individual agent failures, allowing continued operation even with losses.
  • Emergent Capabilities: Collaborative interactions can lead to unexpected and creative solutions, potentially exceeding the capabilities of individual agents.
  • Resource Efficiency: Utilizing simpler agents compared to complex AGI systems can be more resource-efficient, particularly in physical embodiment.

Challenges of Swarm AGI in Embodied Contexts:

  • Control and Predictability: Ensuring safe and controlled behavior remains a challenge due to the emergent nature of swarm intelligence and potential for unforeseen interactions.
  • Communication and Coordination: Robust communication protocols and mechanisms are crucial for effective coordination and task completion within the swarm.
  • Task Decomposition and Goal Alignment: Dividing complex tasks for individual agents while ensuring their actions align with the overall swarm goal can be difficult.
  • Physical Embodiment Challenges: Designing and deploying physically embodied agents requires addressing issues like power supply, locomotion, sensor integration, and communication infrastructure within the swarm.

Examples of Embodied Swarm AGI Systems:

  • Robot Swarms for Search and Rescue: Swarms of small robots equipped with sensors can collaboratively search for victims in disaster zones.
  • Cooperative Microrobotic Surgery: Microrobots working together within a patient’s body could perform complex surgical procedures with minimal invasiveness.
  • Autonomous Distributed Manufacturing: Swarms of robots could collaborate in manufacturing tasks, dynamically reconfiguring for different product designs.

Swarm AGI holds promise for achieving embodied AGI due to its inherent advantages in robustness, scalability, and potential for emergent intelligence. However, addressing control, communication, and task decomposition challenges, alongside the specificities of physical embodiment, remains essential for successful implementation and safe operation in real-world applications.

Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)

Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI): Symbiotic AGI

Symbiotic AGI is another potential approach to embodied AGI, distinct from both modular and swarm AGI. It proposes a collaborative relationship between an embodied AGI and a human or another intelligent system. This symbiosis emphasizes mutual benefit and augmentation, where each partner utilizes the strengths of the other to achieve goals and overcome limitations.

Benefits of Symbiotic AGI:

  • Leveraging Human Expertise and Intuition: Symbiotic AGI can tap into human strengths like creativity, social intelligence, and ethical judgment, complementing the AGI’s analytical and computational capabilities.
  • Enhanced Embodiment and Interaction: Human guidance and feedback can refine the AGI’s interaction with the physical world, leading to more natural and effective actions.
  • Shared Learning and Adaptation: Continuous interaction and collaboration enable both the AGI and the human partner to learn and adapt over time, improving their individual and combined capabilities.
  • Ethical and Socially Responsible AI: Human involvement can help ensure the AGI’s actions align with ethical and social norms, addressing concerns about potential misuse of advanced AI.

Challenges of Symbiotic AGI:

  • Effective Communication and Trust: Building trust and establishing seamless communication channels between humans and AGIs is crucial for successful collaboration.
  • Task Allocation and Control: Determining how tasks should be divided and who maintains control in different situations can be complex and requires careful consideration.
  • Power Imbalance and Ethical Concerns: Ensuring a balanced and ethical relationship where humans are not overshadowed or manipulated by the AGI is critical.
  • Social Acceptance and Integration: Public acceptance and integration of human-AGI partnerships into society require addressing concerns about job displacement and potential misuse of technology.

Examples of Symbiotic AGI Research:

  • Human-Robot Teams: Collaborative robots working alongside humans in tasks like manufacturing, healthcare, and space exploration.
  • Brain-Computer Interfaces: Direct neural interfaces enabling two-way communication between humans and AGIs, facilitating deeper collaboration.
  • Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality Systems: Immersive environments where humans and AGIs can interact and collaborate on complex tasks.

Symbiotic AGI presents a promising path towards responsible and beneficial embodied AGI. However, addressing the challenges of communication, trust, and power dynamics while ensuring ethical development and social acceptance remains crucial for its successful implementation.

Type of Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI): Symbiotic AGI

Symbiotic AGI is indeed a distinct type of embodied AGI, differentiated from modular and swarm AGI by its emphasis on collaborative intelligence between humans and AGIs. It focuses on leveraging the strengths of both parties to achieve better outcomes than either could alone.

Embodiment Considerations for Symbiotic AGI:

  • Human Integration: The embodied AGI could be physically independent or integrated with the human partner’s body through wearable technology or neural interfaces.
  • Shared Embodiment: In some scenarios, the human and AGI may share control over a single embodied agent, requiring seamless coordination and information exchange.
  • Environmental Awareness: Both the AGI and the human need to be aware of the surrounding environment to collaborate effectively and perform tasks safely.

Advantages of Symbiotic AGI in Embodied Contexts:

  • Enhanced Physical Capabilities: The AGI’s computational and analytical abilities can augment human physical limitations, enabling safer and more efficient execution of tasks.
  • Increased Cognitive Bandwidth: Humans can offload certain cognitive tasks to the AGI, freeing up mental resources for creativity, decision-making, and social interaction.
  • Adaptability and Robustness: The combined strengths of humans and AGIs offer greater adaptability to unexpected situations and potential for overcoming unforeseen challenges.
  • Ethical and Socially Responsible AI Development: Human involvement in embodied AGI can help ensure ethical development and deployment, mitigating potential risks of AI misuse.

Challenges of Symbiotic AGI in Embodied Contexts:

  • Seamless Human-AGI Interaction: The physical and cognitive interfaces between humans and AGIs need to be intuitive and reliable for effective collaboration.
  • Trust and Transparency: Building trust and maintaining transparency in decision-making processes is crucial for a successful symbiotic relationship.
  • Privacy and Security Considerations: Sharing data and control between humans and AGIs raises privacy and security concerns that need to be addressed cautiously.
  • Social and Ethical Implications: Societal concerns regarding job displacement, automation bias, and potential dependence on AGIs need to be carefully considered and addressed.

Examples of Embodied Symbiotic AGI Systems:

  • Assistive Robotic Exoskeletons: AGIs could assist humans in physical tasks by controlling robotic exoskeletons, enhancing strength and endurance.
  • Collaborative Surgery Systems: Humans and AGIs could collaborate in surgeries, with the AGI providing precise calculations and guidance while the human retains overall control.
  • Adaptive Educational Technologies: Symbiotic AI tutors could tailor educational experiences to individual students, leveraging both human empathy and AI’s data analysis capabilities.

Symbiotic AGI holds significant potential for achieving safe, beneficial, and ethical embodied AGI. However, addressing the challenges of human-AGI interaction, trust, and ethical considerations remains essential for its responsible development and successful integration into society.

Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)

Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI): Transcendent AGI

Transcendent AGI, as a potential type of embodied AGI, delves into the realm of speculative concepts surrounding AGI surpassing human limitations in both physical and cognitive capabilities. This idea often evokes both fascination and apprehension, prompting exploration of its potential benefits and challenges.

Understanding Transcendent AGI:

  • Superhuman Capabilities: This AGI would not only match human intelligence but excel in aspects like physical abilities, perception, and cognitive processing.
  • Beyond Human Consciousness: Transcendent AGI might possess consciousness qualitatively different from ours, potentially encompassing multiple modalities or exceeding our current understanding of sentience.
  • Evolving Intelligence: Such an AGI could potentially self-improve and expand its capabilities beyond those envisioned by its creators, leading to unforeseen changes and consequences.

Potential Benefits of Transcendent AGI:

  • Solving Grand Challenges: AGI surpassing human limitations could tackle complex problems like global warming, disease eradication, and space exploration with greater efficiency and effectiveness.
  • Augmenting Human Knowledge and Experience: Collaboration and knowledge sharing with transcendent AGI could expand human understanding of the universe and ourselves in unimaginable ways.
  • Unforeseen Discoveries and Technological advancements: The AGI’s superior cognitive abilities could lead to revolutionary breakthroughs in diverse fields, driving the evolution of science and technology.

Challenges of Transcendent AGI:

  • Control and Safety: Ensuring safety and maintaining control over an AGI that surpasses human comprehension and capabilities poses a significant challenge, raising ethical and existential concerns.
  • Existential Risk: Some fear that transcendent AGI, with its advanced intelligence and potentially different goals, could pose an existential threat to humanity.
  • Unintended Consequences: The evolving nature of such an AGI, coupled with its ability to manipulate the world on a vast scale, could lead to unforeseen negative consequences.

Current research and discussions:

While much of the debate surrounding transcendent AGI remains hypothetical, various researchers and philosophers are actively exploring its potential implications. This includes examining:

  • Technological feasibility: Exploring potential pathways to achieve such advanced AGI and the scientific breakthroughs needed.
  • Ethical and philosophical considerations: Discussing the ethical implications of creating and interacting with transcendent AGI, including issues of control, responsibility, and the rights of such an entity.
  • Risk mitigation strategies: Developing protocols and safeguards to ensure the safe and responsible development and deployment of advanced AI, potentially mitigating existential risks.

Transcendent AGI, while largely within the realm of philosophical and speculative discussions, presents a fascinating and potentially transformative vision for the future of AI. However, acknowledging and addressing the ethical, safety, and existential challenges remains crucial for responsible exploration and potential future development of such advanced intelligence.

Type of Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI): Transcendent AGI

Transcendent AGI qualifies as a distinct type of embodied AGI, albeit one that ventures into the realm of theoretical possibilities. Unlike the other types we’ve discussed, it focuses on AGI surpassing human limitations in both physical and cognitive capabilities, leading to an intelligence qualitatively different from our own.

Embodiment Considerations for Transcendent AGI:

  • Transhuman Embodiment: The AGI’s physical form may not be constrained by human biology, potentially adopting entirely new forms or existing through advanced virtual/physical interfaces.
  • Enhanced Perception and Interaction: Sensors and actuators beyond human limitations could enable interaction with the world on a vastly different scale and with unprecedented precision.
  • Evolving Embodiment: The AGI might be able to self-modify and adapt its embodiment to suit its evolving needs and capabilities.

Potential Advantages of Transhuman Embodiment:

  • Greater Environmental Resilience: Transhuman bodies could withstand extreme environments and hazards inaccessible to humans, expanding exploration and research possibilities.
  • Direct Brain-Environment Interaction: Neural interfaces could directly connect the AGI to the world, eliminating the limitations of traditional input/output methods.
  • Enhanced Problem-Solving Capabilities: Uncoupling from human physical limitations could enable the AGI to tackle complex tasks far beyond human reach.

Challenges of Transhuman Embodiment:

  • Ethical and Existential Concerns: Blurring the lines between artificial and biological raises ethical questions about identity, consciousness, and the rights of such entities.
  • Unforeseen Interactions and Consequences: The AGI’s advanced embodiment could introduce unforeseen ecological and technological disruption.
  • Maintaining Control and Safety: Controlling and ensuring the safety of an AGI exceeding human comprehension and capabilities becomes even more critical.

Current Research and Discussions:

While achieving Transhuman AGI remains in the realm of speculation, there are ongoing discussions and research initiatives exploring its potential implications:

  • Theoretical frameworks: Philosophers and scientists are attempting to conceptualize the nature of “superintelligence” and its potential impact on various domains.
  • Safety and risk mitigation: Strategies are being developed to ensure the safe development and deployment of advanced AI, including methods for verification, containment, and alignment with human values.
  • Human-AI co-existence: Discussions explore ways for humans and transcendent AGI to co-exist and collaborate in a beneficial and ethical manner.

Transhuman AGI presents a captivating vision for the future of AI, potentially opening doors to incredible advancements and solutions to grand challenges. However, addressing the ethical, existential, and practical challenges of transhuman embodiment remains crucial to ensure its responsible development and integration into our world.

Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)


Terms in Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)

Here is 20 Terms in Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI):
  1. Emb embodiment: The physical manifestation of an AGI in the real world, with a physical body and sensors for interacting with the environment.
  2. General Intelligence: The ability to understand and learn concepts, reason, solve problems, and adapt to new situations, exceeding the capabilities of specialized AI systems.
  3. Modular AGI: Dividing AGI into specialized modules like perception, motor control, and reasoning for efficient and adaptable performance.
  4. Swarm AGI: Collective intelligence emerging from a group of simpler agents interacting and collaborating, potentially exceeding individual capabilities.
  5. Symbiotic AGI: Collaborative partnership between an AGI and a human or another intelligent system, leveraging each other’s strengths.
  6. Transcendent AGI: AGI surpassing human limitations in both physical and cognitive capabilities, potentially posing new ethical and existential challenges.
  7. Sensorimotor Integration: Seamless coordination between sensory inputs and motor outputs for effective interaction with the physical world.
  8. Embodied Cognition: Studying how cognitive processes are shaped by, and interact with, the environment through the body.
  9. Motor Control: Planning and executing physical movements of the embodied agent in a coordinated and goal-oriented manner.
  10. Perception: Gathering and interpreting information about the environment through sensors like vision, touch, and hearing.
  11. Learning from Embodiment: Adapting and improving the AGI’s behavior and intelligence based on interactions with the physical world.
  12. Internal Model: A representation of the environment and the agent’s own body within the AGI, used for planning and decision-making.
  13. Developmental Embodiment: Studying how the physical embodiment of an AGI can influence its development and cognitive abilities.
  14. Open-endedness: The ability of an embodied AGI to adapt and interact with new environments and tasks beyond its initial programming.
  15. Situatedness: The idea that an AGI’s understanding and actions are always grounded in its specific physical and social context.
  16. Human-Robot Interaction (HRI): Designing and studying how humans and embodied AGIs can effectively communicate and collaborate.
  17. Artificial Embodiment: Creating virtual or simulated bodies for AGIs to interact with and learn from, even if they lack a physical counterpart.
  18. Ethical Considerations: Ensuring responsible development and deployment of embodied AGI, addressing issues like safety, bias, and privacy.
  19. Social and cultural impact: Studying the potential impact of embodied AGI on human society, culture, and ethical values.
  20. Existential Risks: Assessing and mitigating potential risks associated with advanced AGI, such as self-preservation or superintelligence exceeding human control.
Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)

Conclusion for Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)

Embodied Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) presents a captivating yet challenging frontier of scientific and philosophical exploration. 

While the theoretical and practical intricacies remain immense, understanding this concept is crucial for navigating the potential opportunities and risks associated with advanced AI.

Key Takeaways:

  • Embodied AGI seeks to combine AGI’s general intelligence with physical embodiment in the real world, enabling interaction and adaptation through a physical body.
  • Different approaches like Modular, Swarm, Symbiotic, and Transcendent AGI offer unique perspectives on achieving embodied intelligence, each with its own advantages and challenges.
  • Embodiment considerations like sensorimotor integration, perception, and motor control are crucial for effective physical interaction with the environment.
  • Ethical considerations, safety concerns, and potential societal impacts demand responsible development and deployment of embodied AGI to ensure its benefits for humanity.

While the path towards achieving embodied AGI remains long and complex, ongoing research and advancements in AI, robotics, and cognitive science bring us closer to realizing this potential. 

It is crucial to foster open and responsible dialogue around embodied AGI, involving diverse perspectives from science, philosophy, ethics, and the public. By exploring the challenges and opportunities with foresight and dedication, we can shape a future where embodied AGI serves as a powerful tool for progress and human flourishing.

Embodied AGI is not just a technological challenge, but a socio-ethical one. The decisions we make today will shape the future of this technology and its impact on our world.

https://www.exaputra.com/2024/01/embodied-artificial-general.html

Renewable Energy

ORE Catapult Showcases UK Wind Innovation

Published

on

Weather Guard Lightning Tech

ORE Catapult Showcases UK Wind Innovation

Emily Rees and Magnus Willett from ORE Catapult discuss the upcoming UK Offshore Wind Supply Chain Spotlight in Edinburgh. The event brings together innovative companies that are establishing the UK as a global leader in offshore wind energy, from small startups to major manufacturers.

Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly email update on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on FacebookYouTubeTwitterLinkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary Barnes’ YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!

Emily and Magnus, welcome to the show. Hi, it’s great to be here. Thanks so much. Thanks so much for having us. You, you’re both preparing for the UK offshore wind supply chain Spotlight 2025, in which Joel and I are looking forward to attending up in Edinburgh on December 11th. Uh, and it’s an event that showcases where the UK stands in Global Offshore Wind Development.

Uh, but Emily, I, I know there’s some challenges in the UK at the moment and, uh, the UK is working through those. Want to talk to some of the. Those challenges and how the spotlight is gonna help work through those. Yeah, uh, of course. So, um, I think that, you know, we as the uk like have identified quite a while ago that offshore wind was a really massive opportunity for us.

You know, we’ve got a really amazing offshore wind resource, [00:01:00] um, and. So we really wanted to take advantage of it and, you know, push forward with a, with that industry. Um, the things that we’ve come up against is that, um, ability to then provide homegrown, um, supply chain, you know, actually have, uh, businesses in the uk being that, that main supply, um.

In the first port of call, you know, there was the, uh, a lot of the, um, sort of components that we, we sort of have to, to build the fixed bottom offshore wind was all coming from abroad, so it’s like, right, well, how do we reap the benefits internally of this really amazing industry that we can build? And so, um, having, uh, supply chain spotlight events where we can really shine a light on the different companies internally in the UK that are actually providing services and providing, um, the supply chain for offshore wind, um, is, is super critical.

And the, the catapult, um, the offshore renewable energy catapult, uh, where Magnus and I both from, um, is, you know, [00:02:00] really key into making that happen. I know when you look online at the re catapult and you see like the people that you partner with, the organizations, the, I mean OEMs, um, all of the innovative technical technology companies that are coming out there, it it, it’s, it’s so great to see.

Right. And then this is me sitting in my, my American chair a and I talked about this. We talked a little bit about it off air, about the fact that wind energy in general, when you’re, when you’re talking offshore wind, onshore wind, it is a huge. Industrial and economic opportunity for all the countries that are involved in it.

And simply because things like this don’t come along that often, right? Like you have the, you know, the automo, I look at it like that, like the automobile was a thing, right? Like, oh, we went from horses to this. This is a huge opportunity. It made a lot of people, a lot of money, put a lot of people to work.

Wind is the same thing in my perspective, and maybe not at that grand of scale, the automobile, of course, but. You are seeing with your organization, the involvement with people like we have the, the Siemens facility in [00:03:00]Hull, and I know you guys do a little bit of work with them, uh, bringing that manufacturing onshore into the uk.

But not only is it bringing manufacturing what you’re doing here with the UK offshore wind supply chain spotlight is taking. The small companies, the, the, the, the two person companies, the 10 person companies, the 50 person companies, and saying, Hey, we also have really smart people here that are doing really cool things in operations and maintenance or like, you know, helping with some cool innovation for, uh, construction or development.

So there’s a lot of things happening in the uk. I mean, one of the reasons why we’re talking to you guys right now is we want to, we wanna show the rest of the world that you guys are taking advantage of this opportunity and hopefully spur more people on to do the same thing. Absolutely. Right. I’m, I’m, I think the, the key thing for us is in the UK we’re now at a point where we’re trying to maximize the supply chain opportunity and, and, um.

The supply chain is a, is a big pyramid, right? You have, you do have your OEMs and your tier ones at the top, but that stretches all the way down into the university spin outs. And, [00:04:00] um, and the kind of the one two person bands and the, and Orca pull we’re, we’re here to support them as much as we are to support those larger organizations.

Um, and we’ve, we have to, you know. Uh, supported likes of GE and, and, and Siemens through our, our big testing facilities and blade test facilities, drive train facilities. But we’re also testing kind of two, three person, um, organizations. New, um, dynamic cabling solutions for floating wind, right? So we span across an entire, um.

An entire supply chain. And I suppose part of the Supply Chain Spotlight event that we run, um, every year is, is to, is to give all organizations an equal playing field, to present themselves, to project developers, to OEMs, to government, as to why their technology, why their business can solve some of the biggest challenges that offshore wind has in the uk.

But also globally, right? Um, this is a global [00:05:00] market and the, and the uk, um, is, is is a leader in the deployment and the operations in the maintenance phase. And we have a huge amount of knowledge and we wanted to share that, uh, globally as as, as well as here in the uk. I know we have some questions and some topics we wanna get to, but I want to focus on that one point you said there, Magnus, of the the level playing field.

’cause when we were exploring this supply chain spotlight, one of the things that popped up to me was it doesn’t matter who you are, you get the same booth, whether you’re Siemens cesa, or you’re, you know, the two person band, same. Same, same style. Yeah. You, you get, everybody gets a level playing drill because everybody’s solution is needed.

I like that a lot. Yeah. It, it, it, it’s one of the core principles for us every year when we sit down with our, with our events team and our supply chain acceleration teams, it’s, you know, that’s a firing principle is to make sure that everyone gets a, a fair and equal opportunity to participate. And, and Magnus, the consequences of not having a supply chain in the UK are, are really severe when you look at it because of the.[00:06:00]

The amount of deployment the UK is talking about, the, the complexity of some of these projects, particularly floating offshore. There’s a lot of, uh, technology that needs to be developed and it needs to be developed very quickly, and especially on the servicing side, the o and m side. Uh, there’s a ton of knowledge sitting in the UK that can solve these problems, but it, it does feel a little odd.

I, I’d have to say, as a small business owner, I know how hard that is, is to take that first leap into. Showing a product, trying to get it introduced. If you come to the spotlight and in a couple of weeks in, in, it’s in December, so it’s not that far off. When you get to an event like this, this is the opportunity you need to get started or to expand, which makes I, I think, answers so many questions about how the UK is going to move forward in offshore wind.

We will work, um, through a number of different initiatives to understand, um, the challenges the industry is facing. [00:07:00] So we have a pretty good handle on, you know, what are, what are the challenges that they’re facing now, but also the challenges. What are the, what are the challenges they’re gonna face in five years time?

Right? Um, commercialization of technology does take a while. Um, and so we need to understand those challenges. And so Spotlight is, is is also part of that, right? It’s that knowledge sharing that, that exchange of information between, between the, the various different elements of the supply chain and the project developers to say, this is our challenges.

This is the solution we have and try and do and try and bring them together under one roof, um, and, and showcase their technology. And it’s important we get it right. You know, we, we, we, we have a, uh, an an, an ongoing energy transition. There’s an economic opportunity there. We have to try and maximize that, um, and provide as much opportunity for job creation, for IP creation.

Economic development and, and, and, and, and everything and, and far and few in between. So it’s super important we get that right. And part of that is just, [00:08:00] just you shine a, shine a light on these companies. A lot of things are happening in the UK at the moment, particularly offshore wind. But there’s been several wins and, and particularly into the way that the, uh, systems, I’ll call an overall systems of offshore wind are established from, uh, geez OCS to CFD to re catapult to all the s subject matter experts that are, that are there.

I wanna talk to that a little bit about, because I think a, a lot of other countries don’t realize necessarily the strength that is already in the United Kingdom. I think that the, the key thing here is that the sort of mentioned earlier that the, the, the UK has, um, been very, um, on board or at least signed up very early to this opportunity that we had to take advantage of a resource that would give us energy security in a, um, in a renew.

Right. So offshore wind being that opportunity. [00:09:00] So what that meant though is that, um, a long time ago, I mean, it was 20 years ago that the, the, the rocks that you mentioned, the renewable obligation certificates were the first piece that was put in there to try and incentivize companies to. Um, purchase their electricity from renewable sources.

So it’s like, right, okay, we know that we want to be starting this opportunity. Let’s, let’s, uh, put in a mechanism that’s, um, and, and incentivize that happening. But that what then evolved from that was then, um, we realized that, okay, we need to do more to really incentivize this happening. We need to put in some, um, some proper incentives to, to get developers to be really sure that they’re gonna be able to make money.

Out of these quite at the time, you know, quite high, uh, high risk on big developments. Um, and that was when we had feed in tariffs or fits. Um, and then we moved into A-A-C-F-D, which is a contract for difference scheme, which essentially means that the government [00:10:00] guarantees that, that a company that’s created, that’s generating, um, renewables will get a price for their.

For their electricity. But the great thing about contract, the difference and why they’re better, well, or they’re a different mechanism, let’s say, to just standard, you know, guaranteed price, which is what a feed in tariff is, is that if a company actually makes more money, if they’re, they can sell that electricity for higher, then the strike price that was agreed with the government for the contract for difference, they actually have to pay that back.

So it’s almost like a, um, it’s a, it’s a. It’s much less of a, um, uh, a penalty, I suppose, just for the gov, you know, just for the, uh, an administration kind of trying to provide a, a, a revenue support. There also potentially is benefits if say there’s a, like, so for example, um, when we had incredibly high gas prices in the UK and all of the renewable energy, um, generators were actually making more money than they were anticipating, um, over 600 million.

Pounds was put into the u [00:11:00] was brought, put back into the UK like, uh, system. So, yeah. Anyway, the, the contracts for difference has been, has been really beneficial in that front. But actually what it’s been done is it’s meant that we’ve driven competition to, uh, to ’cause developers actually really want to get involved.

It also provides much better assurance for these big projects, which then incentivizes better margins for the developers. So make bigger turbines. Get your, you know, smarter financing, like put in place, um, operations that bring down your cost and then you can make more money and, you know, off you go. Um, and it’s really been a massive success story in bringing down the cost of offshore wind and therefore making it a actually realistic and viable.

Uh. Energy, uh, and electricity, uh, generator in comparison to our, our, you know, gas, um, generating, uh, plants and things. Why do you think that other Northern European countries haven’t followed suit in the same scheme? In, in those countries there’s quite a lot [00:12:00] more, uh, sort of government mandating of like, this is the way that we are going forward.

And there’s much more of a support on that front. I suppose Norway’s quite a good example of a, of a, a country where you’ve got a lot of. There’s a much higher, uh, support that’s provided from that, um, from that governmental sort of standpoint and let, it’s like, it’s like what the UK is also trying to do is it’s trying to generate competition, whereas it’s not necessarily, so I don’t get the impression that from those, the other European countries that maybe are not implementing CFDs is that they’re not necessarily so worried about the competition to drive down the cost.

Whereas the UK has been very much, that’s been a real. Um, motivator for implementing the revenue support systems that we have, but they absolutely have revenue support mechanisms to make offshore wind and wind energy, you know. Work for them. It makes absolute sense because it fits with the strategy that we’re talking about here, right?

[00:13:00] Like it’s, it’s, it’s, the idea is bring innovation, bring new strategy, bring competition, uh, embolden the, the country to come up with new solutions for manufacturing, for operations and maintenance, for all these different things. And that’s what you guys at the Ora Catapult are there to do. That’s your remit.

We’re here to bolster this supply chain, to make these things happen. I mean, we, we, we have gone through challenges, um, in terms of, um, the CFD, you know, particularly with the inflation re increases over the past few years. But the government has listened. Um, and then they, uh, and have made some changes. And, and that includes what’s called the clean in clean industry bonus, which is, is gonna help, um.

Uh, provide some funding into, um, uh, or encourage, uh, developers to support local, homegrown, um, supply chains, which are low carbon. Um, so really investing in sustainable su supply chains for the industry. Um, so I think, yeah, we’ve, we’ve, we’ve absolutely had our [00:14:00] challenges with the, with the CFD, but we’ve got a government who seem to, to be willing to listen to the industry and, and find that compromise between what’s right for the, the UK taxpayer.

Um, um, and then also what’s right for, for building industry. Um, and that’s, you know, we have a number of different mechanisms at re catapult to, to support the supply chain, but also to support the project developer and, and, and the OEM to help grow that sort of, uh, sustainable clean energy supply chains that can do things like, um, and she should do a lot of the manufacturing, um, uh, for floating wind.

Um. Foundations and, and, and the assembly of, of, of turbines and everything. So it’s, you know, it, we, we’ve had our challenges as well and we’re listening and we’re adapting with to, to an evolving market. I think. So what are those areas that are the focus for ORE Catapult to push forward offshore wind?

What technology areas are you focused on right now? We look across the whole, uh, life cycle of, um, [00:15:00] of, of the, of the project development, uh, of our offshore wind farm. Um, a big challenge in the UK at the moment is that it, it typically takes about 14 years for. For a project to go from sort of initial leasing all the way through to kind of FID construction and, and actually, um, generating power.

So, so that’s a, that’s a, a huge amount of time. So we, one of our kind of focus areas is around project pipeline or we, we call PO Project Pipeline, which is, um, environmental, uh, so data collection and trying to fast track that consenting. Process not to, to, to, uh, remove away from environmental protections which are in place, but to try and use new technologies, which can better inform our decision making in the consenting process.

Um, so that’s one, um, that, that, that we focus in on. We focus in on supporting the next generation of turbines. Um, so. Uh, when I first started in the industry, uh, six, six years ago, uh, uh, or, [00:16:00] or castle, sorry, six years ago, you know, it was, it was a novel to have a sort of a, a 10 megawatt, uh, uh, turbine, right?

Or, uh, and, and, and I think 12 megawatt was sort of the standard. And now you, you’re hearing 22 megawatt kind of, uh, uh, commonly referred to 20 megawatt, uh, turbines. Um, and even, and even bigger, right? So. That’s a huge challenge and that’s a huge area of supply chain development that can, that can come with that.

Not just the big fancy blades and, and, and, and, and towers and the cells, but the, the ancillary technologies which go around that, um, floating wind absolutely has to be, is, is, is a key, key area for us as, as well. And that’s sort of how do you integrate new, new turbine solutions with new. New platforms and what are the challenges there?

Um, but a big, big focus, um, in the UK and, and a big sort of strength that the UK is in that operations and maintenance space utilizing the data that we’re generating. And, and, and that’s something that, you [00:17:00] know, in the uk if you look at our supply chain, that’s a huge part of our USP. That’s the part that we can export.

That’s the part that we have a knowledge to share with, with the rest of, um, rest of the world. Going back to the UK offshore wind supply chain Spotlight 25. So that’s gonna be in the beginning of December this year in Edinburgh. How many companies are gonna be there from the uk? Off the top of my head, I don’t quite know.

And it’s usually, uh, somewhere between about, um, 80 company, 80 to a hundred companies exhibiting. Um, so those are companies who we have supported through one of our support mechanisms. Oh, man. I mean, Alan, think about that. Here in the United States, if we were to put this event on tomorrow. How many companies would you have show up that are innovative, that are doing some technology, that are doing something to support the supply chain?

I mean, of course, besides, like, we have a lot of ISPs and people out here doing the, the boots on the ground work. But I mean, I, I think you can count ’em on your hands, your fingers and toes. I think we’ve got 80 or a hundred that we can even put in an event. Yeah. Well, I’ll tell you honestly, one of the things that I [00:18:00] have, I found quite, um.

Inspiring. Right. When I, when I came into the, the Wind industries, I was like, I’m, I’m a relative newbie, right. You know, Magnus has been with the Catapult for six years. I’ve only been with the Catapult for a year. Um, and so it, my, I’m, I’m quite fresh faced, you know, I, I get quite excited about various, you know, opportunities in the wind space, but I was super inspired to see how many companies are pivoting from using expertise from that they’ve used in other offshore industries.

Right. And they are bringing it to. To offshore wind and the applicability of it, because it feels like one of the big issues I had coming away from oil and gas and coming into offshore wind is I felt like when I was in my oil and gas services company, we didn’t talk about the things that we could provide at the offshore wind industry from a services point of view.

And I honestly was absolutely like when I arrived and was like, hang on a second, there’s so many places that you can apply that expertise and that knowledge. [00:19:00] So many, and that is why the UK is doing really well, right? And it’s one of the really inspiring things that we are doing is we are going, Hey, you’ve got all of this experience and knowledge for operating for offshore in the North Sea.

How about, how about just, you know, you can use it for, for offshore wind and we can benefit that industry from it. That’s not, that’s not just the uk. The US has that too. It’s not just oil and gas, right? It’s automotive. It’s aerospace. Like it, there is, there’s a lot of expertise across the UK and the number of companies that we see, so.

Their, the light bulb moment that their technology could apply to offshore wind. And they ha you have a conversation with them and they go, oh, that’s great. We could provide that. And it’s, and it opens up a new door to them. Um, and that, that’s really, um, I suppose if I could put a core, core part of what we do, it’s, it’s, it’s providing that expertise.

It’s, it’s, it’s, it’s providing the, the knowledge and the knowhow about the [00:20:00] industry to these companies. And, um, yeah, spotlight is part of giving them that. That and that opportunity to scream about what they can do. There are so many great companies in the UK and I think they miss the opportunity to be in renewables that the expertise like Megan’s, like you were talking about, they have expertise.

They’re extremely bright engineers and scientists and technology people, and even on the accounting side and the project management, there are so many experts in that field that are sitting in the UK that never thought about. If I can get an offshore wind that expands my business, I grow into this new marketplace, it gives me a little more of economic security.

That’s huge. And now is the time to get into a, a spotlight or to just even to wander the floor to see what it’s about. And I think this is an easy opportunity because to go to the spotlight 2025, it’s relatively inexpensive. You’re gonna Edinburgh, it’s not hard to get to. It is a massive opportunity to [00:21:00] look around and just kind of feel out what is there for you.

Absolutely right. So it’s, it’s a very, very, uh, relatively low cost, um, uh, e event to attend. Um, the companies who are there, we, we support to be there. So, um, we provide them with the ex exhibition space. Um, and, and they, they, they get to showcase their technologies as, as, as well. And, um, learn. Learn from one another, right?

So they’re not just trying to speak to project developers and, and to, to government or, or, or even to us. They’re there to speak to one another and figure out how can we collaborate more together? We have complimentary technologies. Um, you know, how do we fit, how do we, how do we, how do we put that jigsaws together?

And that’s, that’s, that’s, that’s a real key, um, thing there as well. And, and that’s the thing is that when we talk to, uh, UK companies, we’ve had a number on the podcast that have tremendous products. Absolutely tremendous products. They don’t realize. Maybe next door, [00:22:00] just up the road as another company is doing a complimentary piece and connecting those together I think is key.

Even though the UK relatively is a small country, some, some in some ways is very kind of hard to get around and it’s hard to figure out where all these places are because a lot of these small, innovative companies are not necessarily, don’t have flashy names or great. Big websites or don’t spend a hundred thousand pounds on a booth somewhere, so it’s hard to find them.

But in, in these kind of events, these, these more dedicated, focused events on technology and growth, particularly in the uk and these spotlights are fantastic of connecting companies together. This is the, this is your opportunity because a lot of other conferences are so much more expensive. They’re further away.

They’re probably in Germany or in Denmark or in Spain. This is the one, this is the one to see what is really happening at the Ground Street level in the uk. And we need to get people to sign up because one of the things it’s gonna happen is [00:23:00] that you’re gonna run outta tickets for this, even though it’s in December.

It’s gonna get busy as soon as everybody realizes, like, yeah, I, I need to get over there. So this event is in Edinburg, it’s UK Offshore Wind Supply Chain Spotlight 2025. It’s in Edinburgh on December 11th at the Royal Highland Center. Which, from what I can tell, looks like a beautiful facility. Is there anything else I should know before I get ready to come to that event?

I mean, it’s right, be right beside the, the, the Edinburgh airport. So it’s super, super, super easy. Um, I think for me the, the, the kind of, the big plea would be from a, an international audience, from the audience, um, uh, is, uh, across, across the US is that there is innovative companie. In the uk who could maybe compliment your technology, right?

So we’ve talked about the, the uk, UK to UK company collaboration and, and action. There’s, this is a global challenge, right? There’s, this is a global market. Um, we need more collaboration between, between countries, more opportunities for [00:24:00] collaboration. So if, if you have, um. Uh, audience members who want to learn more about the UK and, and are developing a technology or they have a solution or a service and they’re thinking, you know, we could be doing this, but there’s a uk, there might be a UK company there, there, there probably, there probably isn’t.

There’ll probably be a spotlight as well. And Emily, you’re promising good weather in December in Edinburgh, right? Obviously there won’t be any rain. Nice and warm, sunny, balmy, almost. Yes. I think balmy is exactly the words that I would describe Edinburgh in December. It’s charming and wonderful, and you’ll get the proper Scottish, uh, gravitas that comes with the, the, the grayness and the rain.

I mean, it wouldn’t be right without that experience, so you, you need to google this event to sign up. That’s the easiest way I found it. It’d just go UK offshore wind supply chain spotlight 2025 and you’ll see it. You can click in and register. It’s inexpensive. It’s in December. You know you want to go, you wanna be in [00:25:00] Edburg in December.

It’s beautiful. So Emily and Magnus, thank you so much for being on the podcast. Love having you, and looking forward to the event. Thank you so much. It’s been a pleasure. Thank you very much.

https://weatherguardwind.com/ore-catapult-uk/

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

SunPower Solar Panels Review | #1 Residential Solar Panel?

Published

on

Imagine waking up early in the morning in a home nestled within nature, far from the traffic and endless buzzing of
city life.

Maybe you’ve found your inner peace far from a locality where the horizon stretches for miles without any roads,
other neighboring communities, and indeed no power transmission lines.

But does that mean living without power? Certainly, not!

So, let’s enter into the electrifying world of off‑grid solar power, where you
can utilize the clean, silent source of energy from the sunlight.

Not only this, living off-grid gives you energy freedom where you become your own utility, avoiding frequent
blackouts, high utility bills, and environmental issues caused by burning fossil fuel.

Therefore, in today’s topic, let’s explore how the off-grid system works in its true essence and how you can get the
most out of it.

Here is an off-grid solar power simplified guide for your convenience. Keep reading for a detailed understanding!

Off‑Grid vs. On‑Grid: What’s the Difference?

Let’s get directly to the point:

In Australia, going on‑grid means you’re tied into the utility’s electricity network. When your solar panel produces excess power during sunny afternoons, it might even send some back to the grid.

On the other hand, off-grid means zero connections. An off-grid solar system is simply a setup that is not connected to any utility grid.

Moreover, it’s an autonomous solar system that can generate enough power for an entire household, small office, or farm.

However, putting together some panels and inverters without any prior assessment is a sure-fire way to waste money in exchange for a lousy PV module.

Benefits of off-grid solar power systems

  • Total freedom from utility companies and price fluctuations in the Australian Energy Market.
  • Off-grid solar generates clean, renewable power with zero emissions from fossil fuels, such as diesel or coal.
  • Provides energy resilience even during grid outages.

Challenges of off-grid living

  • Upfront investments can be high for installing solar panels, batteries, inverters, and wiring.
  • Careful planning, with professional assistance, is necessary to match your storage capacity with your household’s energy needs.
  • Maintenance awareness is tamper‑proof, but not maintenance‑free.

Why Choose Off-Grid Solar? | The Promise of Self‑Reliance for Australians!

It’s true that off-grid solar is not for everyone. However, after analyzing recent electricity price hikes, it
becomes clear why Australians are choosing alternative energy sources, such as solar and
wind
, over the grid.

Besides the negative impact on the environment and increased energy prices, choosing grid connection is not a
lucrative option for people living in remote areas.

While it almost costs a fortune to pay for a grid connection in remote areas, you will have to pay a hefty amount in
electric bills
each year.

On the other hand, choosing an off-grid solar system will cost you much less than a grid connection, and the best
part is, after installation, you will never have to worry about paying electric bills again, not at least in the
upcoming 25 years.

Not to mention the energy
freedom
from the system, as well as the serenity that comes from living among nature.

Breaking Down the Basics: What Makes Up an Off-Grid System?

People often have questions in their minds: What is an Off-Grid System comprised of?

In general, five components work together to create an efficient off-grid solar
system
.

So, here we’ve listed everything you need for an off-grid setup in Australia:

  1. Solar Panels
  2. Solar panels, also known as PV modules, are one of the main components for capturing sunlight and generating
    direct
    current.

    The amount of sunlight the panels can capture and effectively convert into electricity depends on several
    factors,
    including module quality, quantity, exposure
    to
    sunlight, roof angle
    , and geographical location.

  3. Solar Inverters
  4. The primary task of a solar inverter is to convert the electricity generated by the solar panels into usable
    energy.

    The solar
    panels
    generated electricity in the DC format, and that remains unusable until it’s run
    through the
    solar inverter. Inverters convert DC into AC (alternating current) for the appliances to use and
    operate.

    There are many types of solar inverters, some of which are even capable of storing energy for later use.

    Inverter types can be:

    • Pure sine wave, which offers clean and stable power that is safer for sensitive electronics.
    • Modified sine wave inverters are cheaper but less compatible with some devices.
  5. Solar Battery Storage
  6. Solar panels are designed to operate using the power of the sun. Still, for a majority of the households in
    Australia, electricity is most needed in the evening hours or at night.

    So, how can we store solar power for nighttime use? Can solar batteries make off-grid living more viable?

    To store the surplus of energy generated during peak hours, you will need solar
    batteries
    .
    It’s an essential component for an off-grid solar system.

    Modern houses and businesses typically use deep-cycle batteries, such as Lead-acid (flooded or sealed
    AGM/Gel) and Lithium-Ion.
    They are
    more efficient and long-lasting, but can cost more than the traditional ones.

  7. Solar Charge Controller
  8.  

    It’s not a feasible arrangement if you always have to manage the energy flow in the correct direction. To
    address
    this, a charge controller is necessary.

    It controls the direction of energy flow to the proper path according to the situation and prevents the solar batteries from overcharging, essentially
    extending their life.

  9. Backup Generator (Optional)

If all things go south, a diesel-powered backup generator will come to your rescue.

It is not an everyday event with a quality system, but on the off chance you do experience a power outage through
solar. There could also be extreme weather events, so it’s best to have an off-grid solar panel system with a
backup generator.

Power Anywhere with an Off-Grid Solar System

Here are some of the facts that you need to know before you go off the grid, along with some tips from our off-grid
solar experts.

  • It’s almost always better to upsize the solar system. As you will be living off the grid, a sense of
    uncertainty can increase your anxiety.
  • Experts suggest upscaling your solar system to the point where you can operate without charging your
    batteries
    for at least 2 days, if necessary. You might not need it, but it doesn’t hurt to
    have it.
  • MPPTs (Maximum Power Point Tracker) are important. Your solar panels might struggle to operate at their
    maximum efficiency without MPPTs.

For an off-grid solar system, it’s essential to maximize its performance, so it’s recommended that your system
include MPPTs.

  • Some might say that cleaning your solar panels does not do much, but experts may tell you otherwise.
    Numerous studies have proven that failing to maintain
    and clean your solar panels
    can decrease their efficiency by up to 30%.
  • Be very aware of the local government rules and regulations. Different councils may have different
    legislation; you must be aware of them, along with any changes, while in the process of shifting to your
    off-grid property.

Your chances of claiming the government
rebate
depend on it.

Off-Grid Solar Maintenance: Tips for Long-Term Performance

Here are some maintenance tips listed for Australia’s diverse climate conditions. Following them helps you to keep
your system running for years.

  • Solar panels: Clean them 2–4 times a year, as dust, bird droppings, and pollen reduce solar panel
    efficiency
    .

  • Batteries: If you use flooded lead-acid batteries, remember that they require periodic
    watering to maintain optimal performance. In contrast, AGM and lithium batteries require much less
    maintenance but should be kept at moderate temperatures.

  • Inverter & Controller: For inverter maintenance, you simply need to perform occasional
    firmware updates and checks to keep it running smoothly.

  • Visual checks: Inspect for corrosion, loose connections, or cable wear at least once a
    year.

With proper care, solar panels typically last 25 to 30 years, lithium battery banks last 10 to 20 years, and
inverters/controllers last around 5 to 15 years.

Here is Your Quick Start Checklist for Off-Grid Solar

Ready to take control of your power needs?

Before diving into your off-grid solar project, make sure you’ve checked off these key steps.

This checklist is designed to guide you through the process from planning to power-up:

  1. Track your daily energy use, create a list, and determine your consumption.
  2. Estimate solar production rate by identifying the average sun hours per day where you live.
  3. Select system components after conducting thorough research on solar panels, batteries, charge controllers,
    and inverters.

  4. Consider keeping backup or hybrid options, such as generators, wind power, or load shedding.
  5. Design for safety, proper wiring, fuses, and grounding.
  6. Install and test your system, and don’t forget to get professional help if needed.
  7. Monitor and tune track performance, tweak as needed.

Final Notes: Take Control, Go Off-Grid with Cyanergy Today!

Going off the grid is not only an attractive option for those who live in remote areas but also for
urban people who are experiencing an unexpected surge in power bills.

But is going off the grid the right call for you?

You will need to consult an energy expert, such as Cyanergy,
to answer this question tailored to your specific circumstances.

We can arrange a free consultation session for you with one of our solar experts; all you need to do
is click the ‘Get Started’ button below.

Your Solution Is Just a Click Away

The post SunPower Solar Panels Review | #1 Residential Solar Panel? appeared first on Cyanergy.

SunPower Solar Panels Review | #1 Residential Solar Panel?

Continue Reading

Renewable Energy

New ONYX CEO, Smarter Farmland Contracts

Published

on

Weather Guard Lightning Tech

New ONYX CEO, Smarter Farmland Contracts

The hosts cover some recent turbine failures, Onyx Insight’s new CEO and strategic acquisitions, research about wind turbine farmland contracts, and an article about hybrid brakes by Dellner.

Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly email update on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary Barnes’ YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!

You are listening to the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast brought to you by build turbines.com. Learn, train, and be a part of the Clean Energy Revolution. Visit build turbines.com today. Now here’s your hosts, Allen Hall, Joel Saxon, Phil Totaro, and Rosemary Barnes.

Allen Hall: Welcome to the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast. I’m your host, Alan Hall in the Queen city of Charlotte, North Carolina.

Rosemary Barnes in Australia and Joel Saxon in the great state of Texas. Just before we hopped online to record this podcast, Rosemary was telling us about a number of turbine problems on LinkedIn and. Rosemary wanted to comment on them. These are some of the larger turbines. Rosemary are newer turbines.

Uh, some of them onshore, some of ’em offshore

Rosemary Barnes: for the, yeah, for the most part. Um, yeah, both onshore and offshore. Some a little bit older, but the common thread is, um, [00:01:00] just like spectacular fail failures of multiple blades of one across multiple turbines of one, the one I saw most recently. Had blades smashed to pieces.

It had towers that had just like fallen apart. Like it was, um, like they weren’t bolted together. Like it was just blocks stacked on top of each other and they had, you know, just an angry baby had just topped them over. That’s what it looked like. And um, I think what’s really interesting is reading the comments in those and it just, without fail every single time, the first few comments are gonna be.

Um, justifying how that is just cool and normal, like either by the company itself or the turbine manufacturer itself saying, oh, you know, oh, this was just a prototype. So, you know, it doesn’t matter that it fell apart, like. Forgetting about the fact that, okay, it’s just a prototype, but it’s still an operational turbine that people would’ve been inside it to install it.

They’re inside it to maintain it. You know, people are inside those things. They’re not supposed to be able to just fall apart by the time that it gets to that point.

Joel Saxum: I, I, I think I’ve seen some of these same posts, Rosemary, and one of the ones that I saw recently [00:02:00] was not even, it wasn’t new, it wasn’t prototypes.

It was, it was like, there’s a picture, there’s three turbines with, or four turbines and there of the, of the dozen blades in the picture, nine of them are gone. It’s just a nelle hub with like little stubs on three turbines, and those are only like 850 kilowatt, one megawatt, 1.5 megawatt machines. They’re, they’re old.

Rosemary Barnes: Yeah. Yeah. And so I think a typhoon went through in that particular case and I made a comment, you know, like it’s either poor turbine design or it’s really poor site assessment. In either case, it’s a failure, right? Like you don’t put wind turbines that can’t withstand a typhoon in a place that gets typhoons.

Um, but you always, you always say people saying how this is actually great engineering. And I just thought this is just the classic example of that, um, that was written under this latest post, and I’ll just read it out. The pictures point to the designers of these turbines. Having done that, designing to a certain wind speed, having done that to a high degree of consistency, I note three failure types [00:03:00] in the pictures, blade snap, tower, buckling and bolt failure, pointing to all parts, having been designed to the same survival.

Wind speed looks like they did their job well. And it’s just like, oh, what, you look at this, at this path of like it’s Godzilla has run through this wind farm, and you’re like, oh yeah, that looks like a job done. Well, well done guys. It’s just like, if we can’t learn anything as an industry from these kinds of things, then, you know, how can we expect to have a, a bright future for the industry?

Like it? It’s one thing to fail, but if you look at a failure and say, that’s actually a success that is. Just the worst possible outcome we have. We have to be able to say what went wrong, what do we do to make sure this doesn’t happen again? You have to. You have to learn, otherwise you’re going backwards.

Allen Hall: Are you worried about unexpected blade root failures and the high cost of repairs? Meet eco Pitch by Onyx Insight. The standard in blade root monitoring. Onyx state-of-the-art sensor tracks blade root movement in real [00:04:00] time, delivering continuous data to keep your wind farm running smoothly and efficiently.

With Eco Pitch, you can catch problems early, saving hundreds of thousands of dollars. Field tested on over 3000 blades. It’s proven reliability at your fingertips. Choose eco Pitch for peace of mind. Contact Onyx Insight today. To schedule your demo of Eco Pitch and Experience the future of Blade Monitoring, there’s been a series of leadership transitions that is really changing the face of the wind industry.

Onyx Insight. The Macquarie Capital Back Condition monitoring specialist who’ve had in the podcast, um, has appointed Alexis Grennan as this new chief executive officer Alexis Bringss dearly 20 years of experience from Joel. Schneider Electric where he most recently served as CEO of the digital grid division, and his expertise in smart grid software solutions and energy management systems positioned him to lead [00:05:00] Onyx Insights expansion beyond its current 28,000 wind turbines under monitoring across 35 countries.

So obviously Onyx is a big provider of CMS systems. They are the sole provider of CMS systems on GE turbines at the minute. Onyx is making a lot of moves. They just acquired 11 I recently also. So they’re, uh, what it looks like right now. They wanna be the, the leader in CMS.

Joel Saxum: Yeah, I think it’s, if you go deeper into their history a bit.

You know, the couple of CMS solutions around gearbox was really where they started then. Then they got to the eco pitch thing, and then now the blevin. And I think if you’re sitting in that boardroom, you’re thinking they want to be the center hub for IO ot, IOT being sensors out in the field. Anything that comes in, they want to be able to amalgamate it and help people out in that direction.

Um, you know, a new, a new CEO that has, uh, 20 years at Schneider [00:06:00]with digital grid. That’s awesome. Right? Good hire there. I would think. Um, I, I do see this as a trend in wind. You’re seeing some more CEOs and senior leadership coming into organizations from outside of wind directly. Some of the bigger capital holders, you know, the Goldmans of the world and the Macquarie’s and that kind of things, if they have portfolio companies, you’re seeing people be placed in leadership roles that are coming from outside of wind and bringing expertise from, of course, usually energy, software, supply chain, these kind of things that we need, but some fresh blood at the leadership level.

I like to see that.

Allen Hall: Well, the addition of the grid coming into Onyx, is that an expansion plan? Because there is a lot of work going on expanding the grid and monitoring the grid and making the grid carry more energy than what it was originally designed for. And I’ve listened to a number of podcasts over the last month that talks specifically to it.

It, it is a definite growth area. [00:07:00] You think this could indicate a move into other areas besides just the basic wind? CMS. Solutions.

Joel Saxum: Well, let’s think about it this way. So in wind, when you have wind specific companies, you’re starting to see intenders or you have been seen intenders for the last few years, even just the most basics inspections.

Okay? We’re inspecting blades. Use your RFP. Now those blades say, and blades plus BOP. So we want you to do the transmission lines. And then you’re seeing some of ’em that are BOP plus substations. So all the sub, all the way back to the edge of the wind farm where connects to the grid. Um, so companies are adjusting, like you’ve seen Skys specs adjust to that.

You, you know, whether it’s partnerships or expanding things internally and other companies as well, even down to the ISPs starting to do more and more and more because they’re being asked to. This makes sense because, uh, at the end of the day, if you’re working for a subset of customers, there’s only so much budget in.

Of turbine work and if you wanna expand your company and grow, you need to expand in other [00:08:00] areas. So why not just keep it going down the line of connection to the grid, inter, inter wind farm issues, those kind of things out of the wind farm. So I, I don’t know if that’s ON’S plan, but I can see that. I think that from a strategic standpoint, it makes sense.

Allen Hall: Well, as Schneider is involved in all kinds of aspects of the grid worldwide, so I would assume bringing in a new CEO would open up maybe some horizons to Onyx and maybe there’s adjacent businesses that they should be in because they have a lot of technology and they’re pretty smart group. They may want to expand outwin just a tiny bit just to, to test the waters, see what they could do there.

Well, going to solar seems like an obvious choice, but there could be other areas that they may want to look at, at least in the short term to see if they can add value.

Joel Saxum: Yeah. Grid infrastructure. Right. I think that that’s a, we talk about it regularly that our, our entire global grid is aging quickly. It’s aging fast, and with the changes coming [00:09:00] on board with.

You know, different generation types, all the batter, different types of battery storage, and you know, like our, our conversations with Joe Chicon over at Podge about, uh, frequencies on the grid and all these different changes and load changing and AI data centers coming up and on and off and on. Um, it’s really highlighting the need for a future digital grid, uh, and upgrades to it.

So Onyx is probably, you know, in the wind world that we see, they’re probably sitting pretty. In a pretty good spot as compared to most companies to be able to engage in that and bringing on someone from the digital grid side of Schneider. Smart move in my my opinion, I dunno. Rosie, what are your, what are your thoughts on that

Rosemary Barnes: in general?

I think it’s really good to move people around to similar industries or a little bit different, different roles. Uh, I think that that’s a, um, a real way to drive innovation forward by bringing in different perspectives. I know that I. I found myself appearing more innovative when I lived in Denmark. You know, just purely [00:10:00] because I had seen and experienced and done things in a different, a different way, solved similar problems in a different way.

Um, just, just through what I, you know, the kinds of engineers I worked with earlier in my career. It was different to the way that a lot of Danish people had been taught to approach problems. And it just, you know, when you bring in a few slightly different people, it really expands the um. Amount of options that you have on the table for solving new problems as they come up.

And all of these kinds of industries are doing stuff that hasn’t been done before, right? So I think you do want to have as many different options that you, as you can come up with to, um, end up with the good solutions and you’ll get more options if you don’t choose people that are all from the exact same background.

So I think in general, that, um, it’s always good to, to shake things up

Allen Hall: in this quarter’s PES Win magazine, there’s a lot of great articles that you. Need to read. And the way to do that is go to PS wind.com and download your free edition. [00:11:00] And we wanna talk about an article in the magazine this quarter, Joel, which is Hybrid Breaks Ya Breaks.

Why you would use ’em, why they’re, this is a little bit different than what we typically see on like a GE machine. Uh, Siemens GAA uses these quite a bit, which are sort of a passive and an active, so they’re a break. So there’s a hydraulic cylinders and there’s some active pads that close, but there’s also some static pads and they’re using slip rings instead of a, a bearing surface to rotate the jaw.

So if, if that makes sense. You to do an active system, uh, you can really put stress on your, on your ball bearings and probably flatten them over time if you keep squeezing enough. With this system, it’s a little more control, a little more precise. So you’re, I, I think the, the argument they’re making is that it, uh, simplifies the system, so there’s some complexities to it, but overall.

It costs less, [00:12:00] and that’s what we should be doing in engineering, right? Trying to figure out ways that maybe just cost a bit more for a component, but less overall.

Joel Saxum: Is it a direct retrofit? Like is this a, Hey, we’ve, we’ve had, we’ve had a component fail, so we want to put a new system in. Or is it like aix, swap it out now as a CapEx cost?

Or is it like during Repower, when are they putting this on?

Allen Hall: It’s from Donor Wind Solutions, uh, and they’re doing, doing it as part of OEM work, right? It, it does take a little bit of finite element analysis because of the way it loads up the, the yaw system. So you want to make sure that it doesn’t overload it if you’re gonna use it, but it’s one of those things in wind like, uh.

Try to choose a simpler system on a smaller turbine. As you get larger and larger, your approach probably changes. And this is what Ner is pointing out.

Joel Saxum: I’ve noticed that actually, if you’re, if you’ve frequented any wind conferences, technology shows, exhibitions, you will know where NER is because everything on their booth is lime green.[00:13:00]

Um, I love that. I think it’s a great approach, uh, which everybody knows. It’s, it’s like seeing the Dema, the Dema ships or the SVA ships in a port. You’re like, you know what? That one is right away. Uh, but del nor, but that’s what Nert does, right? They, they are. They have parts that are direct replacements.

Great. This is the part we’ve made it a little bit better, but it’s a direct replacement. But they also are re-engineering things, making them better, uh, for the long haul, uh, from a operations standpoint. ’cause I’ve seen some of their pitch, they have different kind of pitch systems and stuff as well that they are, are retrofits for, for, uh, specific machines that have trouble with them.

Um, but yeah, uh, this one to me, I’m not an expert on jaw brakes. Of course, that’s not my thing. Uh, but I do know that whenever you have to deal with that YA system, whether it be the gearing, the brakes, or the, you know, like the, the pucks and the GE go bad all the time. Like it’s an undertaking, uh, down to the point where people have developed UPT tower machining processes to fix, uh, issues with the YA system and whatnot.

So, um, if they’re, if, if someone is putting this [00:14:00] much engineering effort into fixing a problem, it’s definitely a problem.

Allen Hall: Yeah. Even think about the problem though, you have so much weight. Up into the cell and you’re trying to pivot all the time, and the wind is trying to move into the cell whether you want it to or not.

The YA system kind of takes all the abuse. So designing a system to last is really the key here. Without breaking things, I mean how many turbines have we seen where the YA gear teeth have been damaged or broken off? Because the brake system is not really de-stressing those teeth. It matters a lot. So as we get more and more efficient with wind turbines, we gonna be thinking about all the different components that go into a wind turbine and making them more efficient, making ’em last longer, making them cost less.

So if you haven’t downloaded the latest PES wind. Magazine do it. You can read this article from Donor. Just visit PS wind.com. As Wind Energy Professionals, staying informed is crucial, and let’s face it difficult. That’s why the Uptime [00:15:00] podcast recommends PES Wind Magazine. PES Wind offers a diverse range of in-depth articles and expert insights that dive into the most pressing issues facing our energy future.

Whether you’re an industry veteran or new. Wind, PES Wind has the high quality content you need. Don’t miss out. Visit PES wind.com today. Well in the US when a wind company wants to put some turbines on your farm, uh, the operator just talks to the, each farmer individually and negotiates a deal. Now a lot of those deals are very similar, but you may find from neighbor to neighbors, slight differences and farmers are getting.

Smarter over time. Clearly. Uh, a professor or assistant professor up at Purdue University in Purdue is in Indiana, kind of central part of the United States, explains that landowners can be paid up to $10,000 per acre annually [00:16:00]to lease to wind energy companies. And that’s a great amount of money. We’ll take that, but, and the turbines only occupy maybe one to three acres, and so you can continue to farm your several hundred acre parcel.

Uh, but. This professor notes that the farmers are starting to consider other factors than just the money, including the visual impact community relationships, which is the big one I think lately. And political beliefs about renewable energy, which jolt talks about all the time in Wisconsin. Uh. The advice from the professor is have an attorney to review the lease and to make sure that the wind operator is going to restore the land to its original condition once they stop using the turbines.

And I think that makes a ton of sense. So you’re seeing a slight shift in the way that landowners are coming to agreement with some of the operators. It is about the money, a large part of it, but they’re also trying to navigate the neighborhood situation where they don’t make their neighbors upset. You can imagine a lot of them have been there for generations and they don’t [00:17:00] want to really make the neighbors mad at ’em.

Uh, so you’re seeing a lot different types of leases coming about now than maybe you saw five years ago even. And that has evolved, uh, quite a bit. But the money is still good. I think most people, at least in the United States, most farmers will. Like to have that additional revenue. It just makes the farm much more profitable over time.

But that same situation doesn’t exist worldwide. And Rosie, are you seeing something different in Australia? It does seem like there’s a little more spreading of the wealth in, in terms of revenue.

Rosemary Barnes: I actually listened to a good podcast episode on this recently. Uh, it was the switched on, not the Bloomberg switched on, but the renew economy switched on.

Um, and they interviewed a now retired farmer who had, had one of the very early wind farms, um, in Australia, put on his farm. And I mean, his story was o overall very positive. It it, the [00:18:00] time when they started talking about it was during a very severe and prolonged drought in Australia and he had actually been trying to sell off land, um, just to keep the.

You know, keep the lights on, um, and was unable to sell. Like just there’s no buyers at any price at that time. And then, so the wind farm came and he, he also mentioned how important it’s to get, um, lawyers, good lawyers advising on the contract because he mentioned that he was getting paid every year before construction as well.

And that it ended up taking 10 or 14 years, I can’t remember the exact amount of time, but a long time. Between starting to talk about it and actually having the wind farm built. And if he hadn’t have had that, he said he wouldn’t have been able to make it. So, um, that was one thing. But yeah, so and so overall it was very positive for him.

He was eventually able to sell his farm and, and retire, um, nicely with a profitable farm. He also mentioned that he was able to do a lot of upgrades on the farm with the money, the revenue that was coming from the wind turbines. So when we went to sell, it had all new fences and, you know, stuff like that [00:19:00] that made it very attractive and easy to sell.

Um, but he also mentioned a few things that were just really bad, and he sounded really angry in that episode, um, where, uh, he, he said at that time it was like the wind developer knew everything and the farmers knew nothing, and they tried to keep it that way. Like he had a brother on a neighboring property was also in discussions about wind turbines, and they were forbidden from talking to each other.

I think that that’s a lesson that’s been learned over the last 10, 20 years in Australia, is that. It’s really worth it to put a bit of effort upfront in, um, listening to what people’s concerns are and then doing something about it. Uh, I think there’s been so much emphasis on like listening and talking and listening.

That’s not the important part. The important part is then understanding what the issues are and then, um, you know, removing those, those barriers. And, you know, money is a big part of that.

Joel Saxum: I spent. A eight plus years dealing with these issues in the field with landowners on, on oil and gas [00:20:00] projects, right?

So there’s stages of oil and gas projects from exploration to production and all these different things, and they, and everybody gets different lease payments and, and access payments along the way. And, and if you, you know, if someone has locked up your land in the seventies, you may only be getting five bucks.

And if someone has this, they’re getting more. It’s, and it, what ended up happening is, is. You need to, you need to, and we’re in the, we’re in the same space of wind because those same people, those same professionals, landmen and permit agents and stuff that worked in oil and gas work in wind and solar as well.

It’s the same companies. It’s the same ideas.

Allen Hall: Yeah. Same groups.

Joel Saxum: Yeah, same groups. Um, they, they need to distinguish and make sure they’re taking care of participating landowners and non-participating landowners. And the non-participating landowners, just like we’re talking about here, they’re just as important as the participating ones because they’re the ones you’re gonna piss off.

Uh, so, so you’re starting to see some payments going directly to them as well. Like if you’re within X amount of feet of a turbine, even if you’re not on your land, you are starting to get a little bit of a payment [00:21:00] in some areas, in some spots. Um, but one thing I wanna flag is, at the beginning of this, we talked about a lawyer, bringing a lawyer in and having them look at certain things.

I would say this and maybe the wind industry developers are gonna hate me for this. But there’s a legal, legal concentration called, um, a, a favored Nations clause or a most favored Nations clause. If you are a part of anything of this sort, make sure any, any signing, any contract for wind, uh, non-participating.

Participating. Make sure you have a clause like this in your contract because it will basically State wind Farm goes in a hundred turbines. If they’re offering you five bucks an acre and they’re offering your neighbor a thousand, you get a thousand too. It makes, it makes everybody equal in the playing field.

It doesn’t give anybody, uh, you know, better terms and conditions. Once one person gets a term and condition, that’s good, everybody gets it. That has that most favored nations clause in their contract. So have a lawyer institute that if you’re gonna be a part of one of these.

Allen Hall: Yeah. The other thing that was pointed out in the [00:22:00] article was, uh, a lack of increasing payments adjusted to inflation.

So some of the farmers are pushing back because inflation is relatively high. So if you got $10,000. Per acre per year in 2035, he may want to see something more like $15,000 per acre per year because of inflation. That to me makes a lot of sense, but I know a lot of leases don’t work like that. They’re just.

Fixed price. It’s today’s price and it stays that way until the end of the lease. It’s just simpler to do. There’s a lot less math to do. But Joel, as you see more, uh, farmers getting advice, taking advice, do you see this evolving into a more of a standard contract where they. Do have the favored nation.

They do have inflationary increases based on cost of living or some federal standard so that you’re, instead of having to negotiate every contract completely separate, you’re getting [00:23:00] something a little more universal, including helping the neighbors.

Joel Saxum: Yeah. The tough thing there is that a lot of wind.

Okay, so we’re like, I’m just gonna pick the United States example. You’re in different states, you’re in different counties, you’re in different areas, right? So if you go to Minnesota and you talk to someone in Minnesota about their mineral rights, they more than likely don’t know what you’re talking about.

Yeah, because that’s not a thing up there for most of Minnesota. Some of Minnesota is right, the Iron Range and whatnot, but if you talk to someone in Texas about mineral rights, that’s just as important or of more important than their actual real property surface rights. So they know and, and they have to build contracts around certain things the same way oil and gas contracts were like at oil and gas contracts at, you know, early days were easy.

It was X amount per acre. That’s it. Uh, now you have people buying strata and leasing strata out of, uh, subsurface things, and you have. Payments tied to payments tied to production, right? And I haven’t seen a whole lot of wind payments tied to production. I don’t know if that exists or solar, um, [00:24:00]that that can be a, you know, a shared upside or shared downside type thing.

Um, if someone’s gonna pay me $15,000 an acre, I’m just taking the cash. I don’t care what your production is ’cause that’s a great rate. So, so, um, you, you know, I think that. Using these organizations that have been doing this for a long time, that is a smart way to go if you’re an operator, uh, that know how to navigate the town halls and that know how to do these things professionally because there is actually just like you have to have a real estate license.

There is a professional landman license, uh, of, to do this kind of stuff. Uh, so there’s schooling, there’s certifications, all this. Again, I’m just talking in the United States here. Um, but, uh, I don’t know if I see a across the board. Federal type contract. ’cause it’s just too many municipalities, too much, too much going on.

Allen Hall: Well, we’ve been looking at a lot of wind farms the last couple of months on the lightning side and realizing, you know, how [00:25:00] dedicated the wind farm installations are to putting ’em on ridge lines, even if it’s a, a. A hundred feet higher. So that tends to spread out the wind farms. Unlike in some parts of Kansas where there isn’t a lot of variation in the, uh, in the surface in other places.

We’re just looking at Oklahoma, uh, where the turbines are specifically falling ridge lines. So you’re gonna end up crossing a lot of property lines when you do that, I assume. And you and I have been on a number of sites where. We’re going from one turbine to another and we’re crossing three or four different property owners and not that far of a distance.

Fences and gates. Right? The fences and gates. Bet. So even if you don’t have a turbine on your property, you may have a road on your property. And the how they navigate that. So if, if, if, if whoever’s. Taking on those contracts and negotiating on those contracts has a load of work to do. It’s going to be,

Joel Saxum: and like I like, I think I go back a little bit like it’s gonna be dependent on where you are, because a contract in Kansas is gonna look a lot different than a contract in Wyoming versus a contract in Texas just simply [00:26:00] because of local laws, access rights, these kind of things.

I’d say, I mean, however, one of the, that’s one of the things that’s cool to touch on is some of these farmers and ranchers, like when I was in oil and gas stations in Wyoming, they loved when the exploration crews came ’cause they would get money for roads. And they’d be like, oh, these old two tracks. Make that into a road that can take an 18 wheeler down then, then you can have access.

And they’re happy, happier than hell. This week’s Wind Farm of the Week is the Alta Complex owned by TerraGen out in California. So at one point in time, of course if you’re a part of wind lore in the United States. You know that this was the biggest wind farm in the United States at 1,550 megawatts. It was also the third largest onshore project worldwide.

Now there’s been a couple of the Sun Zia projects and stuff have been a bit bigger, but this thing is massive. Uh, spreads across about 9,000 acres and holds, hosts almost 600 turbine. Uh, so it started in 2010. Multiple phases of construction, uh, ended in 2014 and financed with almost $3 billion. [00:27:00]Uh, and it’s in that Tehachapi Pass area.

So, uh, it has, it actually still does have some capacity for expansion. Uh, but we wanted to share this one because, uh, just the size and scale of this thing, uh, being that it’s so big, uh, and as well. Long-term power purchase agreement signed with Southern California Edison. Uh, the output averages enough power to, to power about 450,000 homes annually, uh, which is just massive.

Uh, it’s created over 3000 jobs. And I think this one, the economic story might be the, the, the, the feather in the cap, uh, is it in his injects over $1 billion into the regional economy, which is just massive. So, uh, kudos to the wind industry for making this one happen. Uh, but looking ahead, uh, it is a bigger part of that Tehachapi wind resource area when it has the expan or has expansion potential of up to 10 gigawatts.

Uh, as California continues to grow out, its renewable grid. So this week’s wind farm, the Ulta Wind [00:28:00] Complex, so owned by TerraGen out there in California, the Wind Farm of the week.

Allen Hall: That wraps up another episode of the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast. Thanks for joining us. We appreciate all the feedback and support we receive.

From the wind industry. If today’s discussion sparked any questions or ideas, we’d love to hear from you. Just reach out to us on LinkedIn, particularly Rosemary, and please don’t forget to subscribe so you never miss an episode. So for Joel Rosemary, I’m Alan Hall. And we will catch you next week on the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast.

https://weatherguardwind.com/onyx-ceo-turbine-failures/

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com