Recent drying over the Amazon could be the “first warning signal” that the rainforest is approaching a tipping point, new research says.
The Amazon is the largest rainforest in the world and receives 2-3 metres of rain every year. However, intensifying droughts and human-driven deforestation mean parts of the forest are beginning to dry out.
The study, published in Science Advances, finds that deforestation is delaying the start of the South American monsoon, leading to reduced rainfall over the Amazon.
The authors warn that continued deforestation could push the region past a tipping point in which a further, rapid reduction in rainfall would kill vast swathes of trees.
Over the past 40 years, the Amazon’s dry season has already become longer, the paper finds. This might be the early warning signal that the combined rainforest and South American monsoon systems are approaching a critical threshold, the authors say.
The authors also stress the importance of ongoing experimental work to quantify the impacts of increasing temperature and CO2 on the Amazon rainforest, so that scientists can produce more accurate models of the links between deforestation and rainfall.
Amazon water cycle
The Amazon is the largest rainforest in the world.
The region contains around 400bn trees and is home to at least 10% of the world’s known species. It is also a key carbon store, holding more than 120bn tonnes of carbon in its vegetation and soil.
Tropical rainforests are warm and humid all year round. The Amazon basin receives around 2-3 metres of rainfall every year on average. It “recycles” much of this rainfall back into the atmosphere through evapotranspiration – the movement of water from the land to the atmosphere through a combination of evaporation and transpiration.
Much of this rainfall comes from the South American monsoon, which is driven in part by the temperature difference between the warm Amazon rainforest and cooler Atlantic ocean.
However, as droughts become more intense and frequent, the humid Amazon climate is beginning to dry, killing trees or making them less resilient to future changes. The ongoing drying trend is exacerbated by deforestation and wildfires.
Around 20% of the Amazon has already been deforested and a further 6% is “highly degraded”.
Dr David Lapola is a research scientist at the State University of Campinas in Brazil and a Carbon Brief contributing editor. Lapola, who was not involved in the study, tells Carbon Brief that the Southern and south-eastern Amazon are “currently experiencing a crisis in terms of changing climate and land use”.
Scientists have warned for decades that human-caused climate change could push key components of the Earth system – such as ice sheets, rainforests and monsoons – past critical thresholds and into new states.
Identifying these “tipping points” is an active area of research.
Previous studies suggest that the Amazon could be pushed beyond its tipping point if forest loss exceeds 40%. At this level of deforestation, evapotranspiration in the Amazon would reduce significantly, leading more trees to die from lack of water.
This self-perpetuating cycle could see large areas of tropical forest turn into dry grasslands in just decades, in a process called “dieback”.
Deforestation
To investigate the link between Amazon deforestation and rainfall, the study authors produce a model of moisture transport across South America that simulates how air moves through the Amazon. The model includes key feedbacks between vegetation, soil moisture and the atmosphere.
The authors find that deforestation reduces the amount of water released into the atmosphere through evapotranspiration. The drop in atmospheric moisture drives a reduction in rainfall.
To form raindrops, water vapour in the atmosphere condenses into liquid water, releasing energy in the form of heat. The reduction in rainfall means that less energy is released in this way, limiting warming in the atmosphere above the region.
As a result, the temperature difference between the warm Amazon rainforest and cooler Atlantic ocean becomes less pronounced. This can cause delays in the onset of the Amazon’s wet season and a lengthening of the dry season, resulting in drier soils and higher tree mortality.
Overall, this feedback means that deforestation in the Amazon weakens the South American monsoon, further reducing rainfall over the Amazon.
Prof Dominick Spracklen is a professor of biosphere-atmosphere interactions at the University of Leeds and co-wrote a “focus” article on the new study.
He tells Carbon Brief that including this complex feedback between the forest and atmosphere makes the rainforest-monsoon system “more sensitive to deforestation, compared to many previous studies that did not include this feedback”.
The graphic below shows the relationship between deforestation and rainfall. The dashed line shows the model used in the study with all feedbacks included, while the solid line shows a model which does not include the atmosphere-vegetation feedbacks.
The study authors find that if deforestation crosses a “critical threshold”, rainfall could drop by 30-50% over just a few years, pushing the system past a tipping point and damaging or killing large areas of the forest.
The model shows that Amazon rainfall is more sensitive to deforestation when key feedbacks between the atmosphere and vegetation are taken into account. This indicates that the tipping point could be crossed sooner than previously thought, the authors warn.
Dr Nils Bochow – a researcher at the Arctic University of Norway and co-author of the study – tells Carbon Brief that “changes in the South American monsoon have a strong influence on the rainforest and vice-versa”. He adds:
“If we do not include these interactions and feedbacks, then we might strongly underestimate the response of the rainforest. This might give a false sense of security or undermine the urgency to act.”
Early warning signs
If an Amazon tipping point is crossed, large sections of lush rainforest could transform into a dry savannah. This process of “savanisation” would take decades to take full effect, but once underway the process is difficult to reverse. The knock-on impacts for the rest of the planet could be profound.
“Tipping points are notoriously hard to understand or predict,” Spracklen tells Carbon Brief.
However, he says there are often early warning signs when a tipping point is approaching. He likens these to the wobble of a spinning top before it falls over.
After using the models to determine what this “wobble” would look like in the Amazon, the authors analyse decades of ERA5 reanalysis data to search for it.
The map below shows the change in soil moisture between 1979 and 2019. Red indicates a drying trend over the four-decade period, while blue indicates wetting.
The authors find that over 1979-2019, soil in the Amazon has become drier. They also find that the dry season now lasts between five and 15 days longer than it used to – meaning that the region is receiving less rainfall, on average, than it was four decades ago.
This indicates that the monsoon-rainforest system has been losing stability in the last decades, the authors say. This might be the first warning signal that a tipping point is approaching, they add.
“The results of this study underline the need to double down on efforts to stop deforestation and help the Amazon region develop in a way that does not lead to additional deforestation,” Spracklen tells Carbon Brief.
Forest loss in the Amazon is beginning to slow. Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon fell by at least 60% in July 2023 compared to the same month last year, after a new administration led by Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva took power in Brazil.
Leaders of the eight Amazon basin countries met in August 2023 to agree on the need to sustainably develop while preventing further deforestation in the region, and formally recognised that the Amazon is approaching a tipping point.
Model uncertainty
This study is “one of the first” to simulate the feedbacks between the monsoon and Amazon, according to the study authors.
Bochow tells Carbon Brief that including these “non-linear” components is key, because when small changes “reinforce each other” they can lead to significant impacts.
However, the model is unable to account for everything. Most notably, it does not include the impact of rising CO2 levels or temperatures on the forest. This omission is a notable “gap” in the study, according to Lapola.
He tells Carbon Brief that elevated CO2 levels can have a significant impact on the forest through changing evapotranspiration levels, reducing rainfall and inducing plants to use water more efficiently.
Lapola adds:
“[We should] have more experimental studies, in which we manipulate the ecosystem to test its limits in terms of resilience – for example, testing [the effects of] higher temperature and CO2.”
Spracklen tells Carbon Brief that researchers need more observational data, but warns that observations also have their “limitations”. A combination of observations and models are needed to make better predictions, he says.
Bochow points out that climate models show “a big spread in the response of the Amazon rainforest to climate change and deforestation” and agrees that there is an “urgent need to constrain the models better by doing more field experiments and observations”.
He also emphasises that “the exact numbers of our model are not to be taken for granted”. He tells Carbon Brief:
“The model simulations are used as guidance where to look for characteristic changes of stability loss in observations. Our study really focuses on the observed changes in the historical data and these do not depend on our employed model.”
The post Drying of Amazon could be early warning of ‘tipping point’ for the rainforest appeared first on Carbon Brief.
Drying of Amazon could be early warning of ‘tipping point’ for the rainforest
Özgür Özel is the leader of Turkey’s main opposition “New Party” and a member of parliament from Manisa.
The world is running out of time to deliver on the Paris Agreement. The UN Environment Programme’s latest Emissions Gap Report concludes that the chance of keeping warming below 1.5C without overshooting it is gone. Even if every country delivers its current national pledges, the planet is heading for about 2.6C of warming this century.
This is the backdrop as governments and their leaders gather in Antalya for COP31, ten years after the Paris Agreement took effect. Turkey lies in the Mediterranean, one of the regions most exposed to climate change, and hosting the summit is a real opportunity.
It is also a responsibility, and that responsibility begins at home. The world does not lack targets. What it has lacked – almost everywhere – is delivery. If Antalya is remembered for anything, it should be for shifting the focus from what countries promise to what they actually do.
For many people in Turkey, the climate crisis is already part of daily life. In 2021, forests in Manavgat, a district of Antalya, burned for more than a week. Last year, wildfires forced more than 50,000 people from their homes around the western coast city of Izmir. This October, Istanbul had its heaviest rainfall in more than 80 years, with the floods killing at least eight people.
COP31 Briefing: What to expect from the Antalya climate summit?
Electrification, the fossil fuel transition, adaptation to rising impacts, climate science and trade are key themes as governments gather for COP31 in TürkiyeBrazil’s fossil fuel roadmap sketches out first global timetable
The COP30 presidency’s voluntary timetable asks countries to plan first, then build up clean energy – only turning to oil and gas supplies from 2031
Measurable outcomes
Two weeks of climate negotiations cannot deliver everything that is needed to resolve the crisis, but COP31 can push for a few things that can be measured. The first is a voluntary fossil-fuel transition roadmap, with national milestones for 2030 and 2035 reported in the same format every year.
The second is a stronger commitment to protecting forests, with progress tracked over time. The third is yearly reporting on progress towards the agreed $1.3 trillion a year in climate finance by 2035, backed by a financial roadmap.
On adaptation, the indicators agreed in Belém should become funded national plans. By COP32, we should be able to see how many countries have an adaptation plan and the financial commitment behind each one.
Regional resilience partnership
The summit also has an unusual shape. Turkey hosts, Australia leads the negotiations, and the Pacific island nations play a central role. Climate diplomacy now sits at the centre of energy security, trade and development, and Turkey, which bridges developed and developing economies, is well placed to help build consensus between them. The lasting value of its presidency will depend on the practical partnerships it leaves behind.
One such partnership could connect two very different regions. On a map, the Mediterranean and the Pacific seem to have little in common, but their problems look similar: eroding coastlines, salt creeping into aquifers, failing harvests, fishing towns with fewer fish.
Turkey and Australia could launch a Mediterranean–Pacific Climate Resilience Partnership, linking coastal cities, scientists, institutions including development banks and island governments. It does not need a new bureaucracy. It can start with a few projects: shared satellite data and early-warning systems, better coastal flood defences, and trials of water-saving farming in the communities most at risk. What matters is visible results on the ground, not a ceremony.
Turkey’s track record
Turkey does have progress to point to. It has committed to net zero by 2053, and its solar and wind capacity has grown fast. The sunshine, the wind and the industrial base are all there. But the long-term direction of the energy mix is still unclear.
Turkey also signed the Glasgow Leaders’ Declaration on Forests and Land Use at COP26, pledging to halt and reverse forest loss by 2030. With four years left, COP31 is a chance to show how that promise will be kept.
COP30 roadmap says faster use of existing tools can halt forest loss by 2030
And while the summit celebrates zero waste, Turkey took in more than half a million tons of European plastic waste last year, much of it bound for Mersin and Adana. On November 21, the day after COP31 closes, an EU ban on plastic-waste exports to non-OECD countries takes effect. Turkey, as an OECD member, is exempt. That should worry us more than it seems to.
None of this will carry much weight unless Turkey’s own record holds up. A leadership at odds with its own environment and its own citizens will struggle to inspire global confidence in its commitment to protecting the planet.
Threat to local climate action
Cities are where adaptation happens. Water, flood protection, waste and urban planning fall largely to municipalities. That is why the imprisonment and removal of more than 50 elected opposition mayors, including the mayor of Istanbul, matter for environment and climate policy, as well as for democracy.
When local leadership is disrupted, investment plans stall and work on flood defences and water supplies loses continuity. As a result, local governments are left paralysed.
Comment: From Australia to Chile, our cities are driving a green investment boom
Inconsistent policymaking when it comes to the environment and climate deepens the problem in Turkey as it does in other countries. A few practical steps would make a real difference.
Set out a gradual, well-planned energy transition. Stop new construction in streambeds and drinking-water basins and put zoning maps online. Inspect every imported plastic shipment and cap total imports. Hold public hearings on environmental impact assessments before permits are issued, not after. And publish an independently audited climate scorecard each year covering emissions, renewables capacity, forest loss and adaptation spending.
This could set an example beyond Turkey. Many emerging economies are trying to cut emissions while protecting jobs and keeping industry competitive. Digital tools and artificial intelligence are already available to help forecast wildfire risk, reduce grid losses and track water use.
With the 1.5C limit now set to be breached, Antalya’s success will be measured by the greenhouse gases avoided, the investments delivered and the forests still standing in the years that follow. It is our responsibility to watch closely and see whether those commitments are delivered, transparently and in line with international standards.
The post Turkey must make COP31 a turning point for global climate action appeared first on Climate Home News.
Turkey must make COP31 a turning point for global climate action
As oil companies pull out of Argentina’s oil heartland in the Patagonian province of Chubut, workers and communities are struggling to secure their future, with little say in the decisions being made about it.
“The impacted are fragmented, the exploiters organised,” said José Glinski, a member of parliament from the province.
In Comodoro Rivadavia, where Argentina’s oil industry began in 1907, those words carry particular weight. For nearly 120 years, oil has shaped the city’s economy and that of Chubut province, which helped power Argentina for decades. Now the companies that built their fortunes there are shifting their investments elsewhere, threatening an economy that has depended on oil for generations.
Argentina’s national oil company, YPF, whose roots lie in Comodoro Rivadavia, is selling off its mature oilfields in the region to concentrate investment in the shale oil and gas reserves of Vaca Muerta, further north. According to Glinski, around 10,000 direct jobs have gone in Chubut, and unemployment has climbed from 2% to 10% in a single year.
“And this while all remaining companies have kept extremely high levels of profit,” he said.
COP31 Briefing: What to expect from the Antalya climate summit?
Glinski blames government policy as much as the companies. “Companies are choosing to leave and the government lets them do so, while weakening tax and environmental regulations, leaving the city without the necessary income to organise the transition.”
Nobody has yet worked out who will clean up the old fields and more than 6,000 wells, look after the workers who remain, or pay for whatever comes next.
Comodoro Rivadavia is not alone. From Mejillones and Tocopilla in Chile to La Guajira in Colombia and Appalachia in the United States, from Scotland to Mpumalanga in South Africa and East Kalimantan in Indonesia, places built around fossil fuels for generations face some version of the same problem. As investment moves elsewhere, plans to protect workers, support communities and repair damaged land often lag far behind, if they exist at all.
Building an economy beyond fossil fuels
In Comodoro, as locals call the city, the community has not been passively waiting for oil to run out.
“We have looked into multiple alternatives for the territory, including building on geothermal capacity, an agricultural programme that could reinforce food security and focus on cultures that are not too water dependent, and exploring also aquaculture built on local species,” explained Ruben Zárate, who heads Comodoro Conocimiento, a public agency created by the municipality to develop economic opportunities. “The only alternative is economic diversification.”
But having ideas is one thing. Finding the money and securing the political support to put them into practice is another. In many countries, decisions that shape a region’s economy are made in the capital or in company boardrooms, and local authorities have little say, and few resources, when a major employer pulls out.
Glinski points to deals struck at the national level that leave communities without a meaningful say in decisions affecting their future.
“Some of the barriers relate to the absence of regulation of private actors which have negotiated conditions at the national level that prevent provinces or territories from capturing benefits that could be useful to fund the transition,” he said. “Comodoro had no voice in these deals.”
One example is Argentina’s Large Investment Incentive Regime, known as RIGI, which offers substantial tax benefits and regulatory guarantees to major investors. Argentina’s Fundación Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (FARN) has warned that this regime could also give large projects preferential access to water and energy at the expense of local communities and businesses, making it harder for regions to diversify their economies.
At root, it’s a question of power: who controls the money and the decisions, and whether the people who kept these industries running for generations have any control over what comes next.
“Comodoro, like most territories that developed around fossil fuels, is heavily dependent. Everyone knew the oil business would end, but none planned for it,” said Antonella Risso, a climate expert and community member. “Comodoro deserves a bright future. Its people have the capacity to chart a future for its next hundred years – a real Just Transition”.
What COP31 could do
Last year in Belém, governments agreed to develop a Just Transition Mechanism. At COP31 in Antalya they will negotiate how it should work, and civil society is pushing for a strong Belém-Antalya Mechanism (BAM) that can help channel resources for action on the ground.
Camila Mercure, a climate policy officer with FARN and a coordinator of CAN’s Just Transition working group, said, “For a city like Comodoro Rivadavia, the BAM could mean support to develop diversification plans, assess viable alternatives, and access public, grant-based finance to put them into practice.”
“Workers and communities must have a meaningful role in shaping these plans, building on local knowledge and priorities. The aim should be to create decent livelihoods beyond fossil fuels and avoid alternatives that reproduce the same economic dependence, inequalities and environmental harm,” she said.
Why COP31 needs to start talking about just transition finance
The BAM could also put regions in touch with each other. Officials in Patagonia, northern Chile, Mpumalanga or East Kalimantan are wrestling with many of the same questions, and sharing what has worked would spare them from starting from scratch.
Then there are the companies. Fossil fuel producers should not be able to walk away from their workers, their environmental obligations and the towns that depended on them. The BAM could help regions share experiences and develop ways to hold companies accountable, ensuring they plan ahead and pay their fair share of the transition costs.
In Comodoro Rivadavia, the transition has already begun, without the community’s consent and with little support. COP31 is a chance to help places like it plan ahead, before the last company leaves rather than after.
The post When the oil companies leave, who pays? appeared first on Climate Home News.
https://www.climatechangenews.com/2026/11/05/when-the-oil-companies-leave-who-pays/