Colombia and Brazil have launched a push for a new binding global treaty on traceability for the critical minerals needed for the clean energy transition along their entire supply chain – from mining to recycling.
The two countries announced the initiative on the sidelines of the COP16 UN biodiversity summit in the Colombian city of Cali this week. Their plan is to come up with a proposal for the pact by the COP30 UN climate conference to be held in Belém, Brazil, in November 2025.
The initiative picks up on one of the recommendations issued by a UN panel on critical minerals in September, which urged countries to create such a transparency platform to help ensure fair and sustainable extraction of minerals for clean energy supply chains. The UN panel suggested the platform could be piloted in “two or three” mineral-producing countries.
Critical minerals – among them lithium, nickel and rare earth elements – are essential for manufacturing renewable energy technologies including solar panels, electric vehicles and batteries.
Q&A: What you need to know about clean energy and critical minerals supply chains
All countries agreed at the COP28 UN climate change summit last year to triple the world’s renewable energy capacity by 2030 – a goal that is set to triple demand for minerals by the same date.
In the race to boost production, uncontrolled expansion of mining activities could cause serious harm to nature and nearby communities, experts have warned. A 2022 study, which reviewed more than 5,000 critical mineral mining projects, found that over half were located on or near Indigenous lands.
“We’re taking a step forward so that minerals used in the energy transition are extracted and commercialised with responsible criteria and in harmony with the environment and local communities,” Colombia’s vice-minister of environment, Mauricio Cabrera, said in a statement issued in Cali.
Industry scrutiny needed
At the launch event for the transparency initiative, Norwegian diplomat Lars Vaagen said developed countries did not yet have a common position on whether to support the treaty, but added “what we can promise is that we will follow this initiative very closely”.
Suneeta Kaimal, CEO of the Natural Resource Governance Institute, welcomed the idea but said traceability “is only part of the solution”.
“Traceability alone will have no impact without credible, independent scrutiny of industry actions and impacts against high standards of best practice,” Kaimal told the launch.
Human rights must be “at the core” of mining for transition minerals, UN panel says
The UN panel on critical minerals – which was convened by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and included governments, industry, civil society and Indigenous peoples – has issued a set of seven principles to guide greener and more ethical mining for the energy transition, calling on countries to keep human rights “at the core”.
Among the two proponents of the traceability pact, Brazil in particular sits on top of vast reserves of nickel, manganese and rare earth metals. According to the International Energy Agency, the country holds about a fifth of global reserves of all these minerals, but is still only producing small amounts.
(Reporting by Sebastian Rodriguez; editing by Megan Rowling)
The post Colombia and Brazil to present proposal for new critical minerals pact at COP30 appeared first on Climate Home News.
https://www.climatechangenews.com/2024/10/31/colombia-and-brazil-to-present-proposal-for-new-critical-minerals-pact-at-cop30/
Climate Change
The Farming Industry Has Embraced ‘Precision Agriculture’ and AI, but Critics Question Its Environmental Benefits
Why have tech heavyweights, including Google and Microsoft, become so deeply integrated in agriculture? And who benefits from their involvement?
Picture an American farm in your mind.
Climate Change
With Love: Living consciously in nature
I fell flat on my backside one afternoon this January and, weirdly, it made me think of you. Okay, I know that takes a bit of unpacking—so let me go back and start at the beginning.
For the last six years, our family has joined with half a dozen others to spend a week or so up at Wangat Lodge, located on a 50-acre subtropical rainforest property around three hours north of Sydney. The accommodation is pretty basic, with no wifi coverage—so time in Wangat really revolves around the bush. You live by the rhythm of the sun and the rain, with the days punctuated by swimming in the river and walking through the forest.
An intrinsic part of Wangat is Dan, the owner and custodian of the place, and the guide on our walks. He talks about time, place, and care with great enthusiasm, but always tenderly and never with sanctimony. “There is no such thing as ‘the same walk’”, is one of Dan’s refrains, because the way he sees it “every day, there is change in the world around you” of plants, animals, water and weather. Dan speaks of Wangat with such evident love, but not covetousness; it is a lightness which includes gentle consciousness that his own obligations arise only because of the historic dispossession of others. He inspires because of how he is.
One of the highlights this year was a river walk with Dan, during which we paddled or waded through most of the route, with only occasional scrambles up the bank. Sometimes the only sensible option is to swim. Among the life around us, we notice large numbers of tadpoles in the water, which is clean enough to drink. Our own tadpoles, the kids in the group, delight in the expedition. I overhear one of the youngest children declaring that she’s having ‘one of the best days ever’. Dan looks content. Part of his mission is to reintroduce children to nature, so that the soles of their feet may learn from the uneven ground, and their muscles from the cool of the water.
These moments are for thankfulness in the life that lives.

It is at the very end of the walk when I overbalance and fall on my arse—and am reminded of the eternal truth that rocks are hard. As I gingerly get up, my youngest daughter looks at me, caught between amusement and concern, and asks me if I’m okay.
I have to think before answering, because yes, physically I’m fine. But I feel too, an underlying sense of discomfort; it is that omnipresent pressure of existential awareness about the scale of suffering and ecological damage now at large in the world, made so much more immediately acute after Bondi; the dissonance that such horrors can somehow exist simultaneously with this small group being alive and happy in this place, on this earth-kissed afternoon.
How is it okay, to be “okay”? What is it to live with conscience in Wangat? Those of us who still have access to time, space, safety and high levels of volition on this planet carry this duality all the time, as our gift and obligation. It is not an easy thing to make sense of; but for me, it speaks to the question of ‘why Greenpeace’? Because the moral and strategic mission-focus of campaigning provides a principled basis for how each of us can bridge that interminable gulf.
The essence of campaigning is to make the world’s state of crisis legible and actionable, by isolating systemic threats to which we can rise and respond credibly, with resources allocated to activity in accordance with strategy. To be part of Greenpeace, whether as an activist, volunteer supporter or staff member, is to find a home for your worries for the world in confidence and faith that together we have the power to do something about it. Together we meet the confusion of the moment with the light of shared purpose and the confidence of direction.
So, it was as I was getting back up again from my tumble and considering my daughter’s question that I thought of you—with gratitude, and with love–-because we cross this bridge all the time, together, everyday; to face the present and the future.
‘Yes, my love’, I say to my daughter, smiling as I get to my feet, “I’m okay”. And I close my eyes and think of a world in which the fires are out, and everywhere, all tadpoles have the conditions of flourishing to be able to grow peacefully into frogs.
Thank you for being a part of Greenpeace.
With love,
David
Climate Change
Without Weighing Costs to Public Health, EPA Rolls Back Air Pollution Standards for Coal Plants
The federal Mercury and Air Toxics Standards for coal and oil-fired power plants were strengthened during the Biden administration.
Last week, when the Environmental Protection Agency finalized its repeal of tightened 2024 air pollution standards for power plants, the agency claimed the rollback would save $670 million.
Without Weighing Costs to Public Health, EPA Rolls Back Air Pollution Standards for Coal Plants
-
Greenhouse Gases7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Spanish-language misinformation on renewable energy spreads online, report shows
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
