The world of climate tech investment witnessed a significant transformation in 2024, primarily driven by the AI boom. This reshaping was about emerging technologies and sectors traditionally linked to energy and infrastructure. However, funding seems to be waning.
Funding Declines, But AI Powers New Opportunities in Climate Tech
According to PitchBook data, venture capital (VC) investment in climate tech declined globally for the third consecutive year.
Funding dropped from $25.9 billion in 2022 to $19.7 billion in 2023, and further to $17 billion in 2024, reflecting a 34% decrease over two years.

Pre-seed and seed rounds were particularly slow last year, dropping from 246 deals to 152 deals in the U.S. For climate-tech startups, raising a seed deal is a particularly tough ask, especially for hardware businesses requiring substantial capital expenditure before reaching a pilot product.

Climate tech remains a risky area for investment, even when money is cheap. The sector took heavy blows in 2024, including Northvolt, a lithium EV battery developer that raised $9 billion in equity and convertible debt, spiraling into bankruptcy in November. Universal Hydrogen, a startup developing a fully hydrogen-powered plane, also ran out of cash.
However, despite this decline, certain subsectors thrived. AI-driven data centers and their associated technologies emerged as pivotal drivers of growth, drawing substantial interest and funding from investors.
Sightline Climate’s review of 2024 climate tech trends highlighted that energy and building technologies, particularly those tied to AI data centers, bucked the declining investment trend.
- The energy sector saw a 12% increase in funding, reaching $9.4 billion, while building technologies grew by 10% to $2.7 billion. This surge was driven by the anticipated rise in energy consumption due to AI operations.
Generative AI models, like ChatGPT, consume nearly 10 times more energy per query compared to a standard Google search. To support such energy-intensive operations, data centers are predicted to increase their power demand by 2.4% annually until 2030. This energy requirement reverses a decade-long trend of flat growth.
Billions Flowing into Cleaner Data Centers
As AI technologies grow, so does the demand for cleaner and more sustainable data centers. Leading tech companies, including Google, Amazon, and Microsoft, have set ambitious emissions targets, creating opportunities for innovative climate tech solutions.
Kim Zou, CEO of Sightline Climate, highlighted that AI’s rapid rise presents both challenges and opportunities. Emerging clean power solutions, like nuclear and geothermal energy, as well as energy-efficient data center technologies, are now in the spotlight. Zou specifically highlighted that:
“On one hand, we’re seeing unprecedented load growth coming onto an already constrained grid. On the other hand, AI-led demand is driving momentum for emerging clean firm power solutions…”
In 2024, several notable investments reflected the urgency to meet AI’s growing energy needs sustainably, including:
Crusoe Energy’s $600 Million Raise
Crusoe Energy, originally focused on cryptocurrency mining, now provides vertically integrated AI services, including data centers optimized for clean energy. This December 2024 deal marked the largest climate tech investment of the year.
Amazon’s $500 Million Bet on X-Energy
Amazon partnered with X-Energy to deploy over 5 gigawatts of nuclear power projects in the U.S. by 2039. This capacity would represent about 10% of the additional energy needed to support U.S. data center growth through 2030, according to Goldman Sachs estimates.
Form Energy’s $405 Million Round
Form Energy developed an iron-based battery capable of storing power for up to 100 hours—20 times longer than most current systems. This innovation supports utilities in managing energy demand surges and the variability of renewable sources like wind and solar.
Scala’s $500 Million Investment
Scala, a Brazilian data center provider emphasizing clean energy, also secured a significant deal in September 2024. The company exemplifies a global push toward sustainable AI infrastructure.

Climate Tech Beyond Data Centers
While data centers dominated the climate tech landscape, other sectors also experienced notable advancements. In transportation, electric vehicle (EV) technologies continued to attract significant investment.
Companies working on EV battery recycling and efficiency saw increased funding, driven by a growing focus on the circular economy. Additionally, startups specializing in grid management solutions gained traction, addressing the challenges of integrating renewable energy sources into existing power networks.
In agriculture, innovations aimed at reducing methane emissions and improving soil health gained momentum. Technologies such as precision farming tools and methane-reducing feed additives drew investor interest, aligning with global efforts to lower greenhouse gas emissions from the agricultural sector.
The Role of AI in Shaping Investment Trends
AI’s influence extends beyond its direct impact on data centers. Venture capitalists are increasingly leveraging AI-driven analytics to identify promising climate tech startups. Predictive models and machine learning tools help investors assess risks and returns, enabling more informed decision-making in a complex and evolving market.
AI is also driving innovation within climate tech itself. Startups are using AI to optimize renewable energy systems, enhance energy storage technologies, and improve carbon capture methods. These advancements not only attract funding but also accelerate the deployment of climate solutions on a global scale.
Per Pitchbook data, VC investments in startups surged by nearly 30% in 2024, driven largely by the booming AI industry. Leading firms like Greycroft and Kleiner Perkins are doubling down on AI despite rising valuations.
However, climate-tech deals are declining, even as awareness grows about the need for clean energy investments. This is crucial to meet the energy demands fueled by AI’s rapid growth, highlighting a shift in industry priorities as AI takes center stage in the venture capital landscape.
A Future Fueled by Innovation
Clean energy investors anticipate challenging months ahead for startups as the energy industry adapts to Donald Trump’s administration. With uncertainty around project financing and regulations, some VCs are advising companies to delay fundraising efforts until the landscape becomes clearer.
Investors are now focusing on scalable solutions that address both immediate and long-term needs. From energy-efficient data centers to breakthroughs in battery technology, the innovations emerging today will shape the future of climate tech.
With billions of dollars flowing into transformative projects, the intersection of AI and climate tech offers a glimpse into a future where technology and sustainability go hand in hand.
- READ MORE: 2025: The Year Clean Energy Dominates with Record $670 Billion Investment, Trumping Oil & Gas
The post Climate Tech VC Investments Drop for the 3rd Year in a Row, AI to the Rescue appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
The real cost of 1 tonne of CO2: Translating carbon into hectares
Every business carbon footprint report ends with a number, the amount of carbon emissions produced by the business, less the amount of carbon reduced and offset, given in tonnes of CO₂. Many of the people who sign off on that number, including those who paid for it, cannot picture what it represents on the ground. A tonne is a unit of mass. CO₂ is invisible. The link between the amount offset in the report and a real piece of restored forest somewhere in the world is almost never indicated.
![]()
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测


