The major Republican bill passed this morning by the U.S. House of Representatives aims to decimate the incentives and tax credits in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), our nation’s largest climate and clean energy legislation, passed in 2022 under the Biden Administration.
If this bill comes to fruition, it will raise everyone’s energy costs, take away hundreds of thousands of clean energy workers’ livelihoods, and leave the environment more polluted.
Here in the Southeast, our households, neighbors, friends, and family members will be particularly hard hit by the negative effects of this bill, as it repeals policies supporting major economic development projects in our region, while also leaving electric utilities unable to meet growing electricity demand.
The version of the bill passed this morning by the full House kept all of the same problems of the dangerous draft text that was unveiled last week, and was actually made WORSE last night. The bill will repeal the availability of tax credits for clean energy and transportation, which are the primary federal policy drivers of clean energy deployment. Their repeal will have harmful effects for consumers and businesses and will devastate some industries.
This version of the House bill is the worst case scenario for clean energy growth, environmental and human health protections, and United States competitiveness in the 21st century, with devastating impacts on middle class consumers. Worst of all, citizens across the Southeast will be hit hardest as this version of the bill destroys multiple growth industries in our region, including battery manufacturing, electric vehicles production, and renewable energy manufacturing and supply chain industries.
The bill runs counter to the administration’s stated goals of expanding energy production by undercutting the fastest-growing energy resources – solar, wind, and battery storage – while unrealistically expecting fossil fuels like coal and methane to meet all expanding load growth. It forces consumers to pay more for energy by destroying the energy efficiency tax credits and slowing the adoption of electric vehicles. Collectively, it cedes the technology playing field to China for advanced automobiles and clean energy while completely ignoring the science of climate disruption gripping our planet today.
Devastation for Southeast Industries
The House bill would devastate key areas of economic growth in the Southeast, putting a bullseye on vehicle and battery manufacturing, which has led to historic economic development trends in Southeastern states in recent years. Between North Carolina, Tennessee, South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida, companies have announced more than $73 billion in private investment into the clean energy industry supply chain, and more than 92,000 new clean energy jobs, under the current tax credit laws, which the House Republicans’ bill seeks to undo.
The bill in Congress would repeal the tax credits that incentivize purchasing electric vehicles and repeal federal vehicle emissions standards, which, taken together, could reduce sales of electric vehicles by 40% in 2030. According to experts, this would put as much as 100% of planned construction and expansion of U.S. electric vehicle assembly and half of existing assembly capacity at risk of cancellation or closure, and could put 29-72% of battery cell manufacturing capacity currently operating or online by the end of 2025 at risk of closure, in addition to 100% of other planned facilities.
The Economic Impact on Consumers
One underappreciated fact of the clean energy tax credits in IRA is that they lower energy prices for all Americans, not just the taxpayers who claim the credits. When tax credits, like those in IRA, incentivize consumers to switch to electric vehicles, demand for gasoline decreases, and with lower demand comes lower prices at the pump for all non-electric drivers. The version of the new bill passed by the House would raise energy costs for consumers on multiple fronts: higher prices for electricity, higher gasoline prices at the pump, and higher prices for methane gas, often erroneously referred to as “natural” gas.
Southeast States Hit Hard
Multiple expert firms have modeled the impact of repealing clean energy and transportation tax credits, and they have unanimously found that household energy bills will increase. For example, one analysis found that average household energy costs would rise by $110-$180 in 2030, growing to $275-$400 by 2035.
Another study looked at state-by-state impacts and found that the Southeast would be very hard hit by rising energy costs, with North Carolinians, South Carolinians, and Tennesseans facing 10-15% higher prices for residential customers in 2026 and 2029, and commercial and industrial customers in these states paying 15-22% higher electricity prices in 2026 and 2029. Increased energy costs for businesses will make them less competitive globally.
The price for gasoline that consumers pay at the pump would increase by 5-15 cents per gallon.
Clearly, the implications for our region and the nation are dire. We’ll take a deeper dive in an upcoming article, but at this juncture, as the bill moves to the Senate, it’s also helpful to consider recent analysis discussed on the Heatmap News ‘Shift Key’ podcast with guests Robinson Meyer and Jesse Jenkins. Highlights include:
Economic Impact on Consumers
- The Republican House bill would significantly increase energy costs for American households and businesses
- Average household energy costs would rise by $110-$180 in 2030, growing to $275-$400 by 2035
- The bill effectively functions as a “backdoor gas tax” – removing EV incentives increases gasoline demand and prices by an estimated $0.05-$0.15 per gallon
- Industrial electricity rates would increase 7-12% by 2035, making American businesses less competitive globally
Devastating Impact on the Southeast’s “Battery Belt”
- The bill would particularly harm the Southeast, where massive battery and EV manufacturing investments are concentrated in states like Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Kentucky
- Jenkins specifically notes this “battery boom” is happening “in mostly Republican districts”
- The 40% reduction in EV sales would make most planned battery manufacturing capacity “redundant” – meaning factories would be “idled or have to be repurposed to build internal combustion cars”
- Investments in “new product lines and new assembly lines and robotics, and everything else would be wasted”
- The region has also seen significant growth in manufacturing electricity demand as part of the broader “Battery Belt” development
- This represents a particularly stark political irony – Republican-led legislation undermining major industrial investments in Republican states
Emissions and Climate Impact
- Dismantling current policies would increase greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 500 million tons by 2030, rising to over 1 billion tons by 2035
- This represents a massive reversal – US energy emissions are currently about 5 gigatons total
- The bill would slow but not halt the energy transition, reverting the US to close to pre-IRA emission levels
- Major increases come from repealing EPA power plant regulations and clean electricity tax credits
Power Sector Consequences
- The bill threatens America’s ability to meet surging electricity demand, particularly from data centers and AI development
- In the near term, emissions would actually increase as coal plants ramp up to meet demand that clean energy can no longer fill
- Solar and wind deployment would collapse after initial momentum, unable to keep pace with demand growth
- This creates higher electricity prices despite lower overall electricity usage
Manufacturing and Jobs Impact
- The bill would “decimate” the emerging US battery manufacturing sector, making most planned capacity additions redundant
- About 8 million fewer electric vehicles would be sold by 2030, undermining the entire EV supply chain
- This contradicts the Trump administration’s goals of building domestic critical mineral capacity, as it destroys downstream demand
Policy Mechanisms
The House bill operates through several mechanisms:
- Ending IRA tax credits by 2026 (much more aggressive than initially expected)
- Repealing EPA emissions regulations on power plants, transportation, and methane
- Including “poison pill” foreign entity of concern clauses that make remaining tax credits practically unusable
- Rescinding unspent grant funding from federal agencies
In summary, the House bill is much more aggressive than many expected, approaching full repeal rather than surgical modifications. It comes at a particularly bad time as electricity demand is surging due to data centers, manufacturing, and electrification, and Republican moderates who might have opposed these cuts have largely failed to mount effective resistance.
As we follow the Senate deliberations around this bill, SACE will continue to share information and ways to reach out to your elected officials to share your concerns.
The post Clean Energy Repeal Bill Threatens $73 Billion in Southeast Investment appeared first on SACE | Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.
Clean Energy Repeal Bill Threatens $73 Billion in Southeast Investment
Renewable Energy
As Europe Shuns Chinese Turbines and Components, Who Will Fill the Gap?
Weather Guard Lightning Tech

As Europe Shuns Chinese Turbines and Components, Who Will Fill the Gap?
While most of Europe has spent most of this year itemizing reasons it cannot, should not, and will not use Chinese wind turbines or components, accusations and arm-twisting tactics have garnered most of the attention.
But we invite you to consider a future – maybe just five, or ten years from now?- in which those same countries and companies are eagerly awaiting orders from wind turbine manufacturing facilities in… India.
What?!
You know that the country has a lot of installed wind.
You may think – and many in the industry would agree – that India’s blade manufacturers are a few revs behind blade-makers elsewhere in the world. But the country is newly committed to manufacturing and it’s busy installing more – provided that it’s made in India, with Indian technology, by Indian workers.
Of course, similar domestic-focused policy currents are running through European countries – where wind OEMs are almost inarguably a decade ahead of Indian manufacturers. But there’s an important reason why we say, “watch India” in wind turbine manufacturing.
It’s because you might learn something.
If you follow The Uptime Wind Energy Podcast, you probably heard this discussion a few weeks ago. It wasn’t the headline story – we try to highlight as many major news items and trends that we can, and follow up as credible information becomes available. India’s quiet moves to strengthen its own renewable energy industries didn’t grab the headlines. But it comprised a good bit of our panelists’ discussion.
With India’s expanding manufacturing capacity, and Suzlon’s strategic offerings for the European market (Blue Sky), there are reasons for European developers to take a closer look at Indian manufacturers.
If Europe continues to squelch deals with Chinese manufacturers due to data security issues, India is a relatively obvious candidate to fill the void, for several reasons:
- The country has depth and breadth in R&D: India (Suzlon, specifically) has a track record of involvement and relationships across the continent, as it operates research and development centers in Germany, the Netherlands, and Denmark.
- Indian service providers have reach: Inox and Adoni Wind operate multiple wind turbine manufacturing plants and wind farms throughout several Indian states, and Apraava Energy has been commissioning wind projects, working with multiple OEMs, for more than 16 years.
- The country’s energy sector has size: Tata Power is estimated to be worth about US$16 billion and employs 22,000 people.
And major manufacturers from other countries have had a strong presence in the country for years:
- GE Vernova has turbine blade and nacelle manufacturing operations and multiple tech/R&D centers in India;
- Vestas has a R&D technology center in Chennai; and
- China’s SANY Wind has had assembly facilities in India since 2017, and in 2024, it signed a licensing agreement with JSW allowing SANY to manufacture blades and generators for JSW – enabling JSW Neo Energy to produce wind turbine generators and major components in-country.
So while there is hard data suggesting that India is already a global hub for wind turbines, sometimes the real strength comes from soft skills. Like sharing information.
We’ve noticed that Indian manufactures aren’t stingy with information. They share what they learn in the field and on the shop floor, so that the whole industry can move faster to solve problems. That bodes well for the industry overall, and particularly well for companies who figure out how to solve problems that some manufacturers aren’t even ready to admit to having.
We’ll be watching India with a great deal of interest in the coming months. Subscribe to The Uptime Wind Energy Podcast and follow along with us.
We’re not financial analysts. We’re engineers who watch the wind industry very closely. This is what we’ve noticed, and we thought it was worth sharing.
Where do you think you’ll be looking for solutions, components, and service providers in the next few years or the next decade? Tell us what you think. We’d love to hear from you.
As Europe Shuns Chinese Turbines and Components, Who Will Fill the Gap?
Renewable Energy
When You Write for Idiots, You Can Get Away with Anything
To the author of the meme here:
“Either” refers to two choices; “any” refers to three or more.
More importantly, it’s amazing how shamelessly the ultra-right wing exaggerates. The left side of the Democratic party would like to see the United States look like social democracies in places like Scandinavia. Having government programs that benefit the common person, e.g., Social Security, public schools, emergency relief, libraries, environmental responsibility, etc., does not equate to Stalinism.
Renewable Energy
Are Muslims “Dangerous?”
Some of my old prep school chums from the Class of 1973 convene via Zoom approximately every six weeks for a 90-minute discussion of current events, science, and anything else that sounds interesting.
Our professions range from medicine, law, finance, and business management. All from highly ranked colleges. Over 50% hold doctorate degrees.
Here’s something I find fascinating about the group: it includes one right-wing conservative. I don’t mean a Reaganite; I mean a Trump supporter. This guy is incapable of any thought that doesn’t come directly from Nexsmax.
It’s almost eerie how closely he toes the line of the far-right. Yesterday he echoed the Newsmax talking point and told the group that all Muslims holding public office are “very dangerous” and should be removed.
Now, the rest of us are sitting there, dumbfounded at this idea, unwilling waste our breath on this racist and utterly preposterous concept.
All this raises the question: How are our political viewpoints formed? How much of this is genetics? Epigenetics? Early childhood experiences? How do take a boy from among the best environments and turn him into someone who struggles to understand the most basic principles on which our country was founded?
https://www.2greenenergy.com/2026/11/09/principles-country-was-founded/
-
Climate Change1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Renewable Energy1 year agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测
-
Climate Change2 years agoAnalysis: China’s CO2 falls 1% in Q2 2024 in first quarterly drop since Covid-19
-
Climate Change1 year ago嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测

