Welcome to Carbon Brief’s China Briefing.
Carbon Brief handpicks and explains the most important climate and energy stories from China over the past fortnight. Subscribe for free here.
Key developments
China restricts exports of key electric vehicle battery component
GRAPHITE CURBED: China placed export controls on graphite, requiring “special export permits” for three forms of the mineral, which is commonly used to manufacture electric vehicle (EV) batteries, the Financial Times reported. The decision was made in response to the US’s tightened controls on exports of cutting-edge artificial intelligence chips to China, the outlet added. Finance newspaper Yicai quoted a Chinese ministry of commerce spokesperson saying that China “does not target any specific country or region, nor any specific industry” with the restrictions.
UNCERTAIN IMPACT: Reuters stated that the move has “fuelled uncertainty” in the EV sector. It added that Chinese manufacturers with overseas plants “expect limited impact” as they largely use synthetic graphite. Foreign manufacturers, who largely have not made the shift to synthetic graphite, will be disproportionately affected, the newswire added. However, the restricted items had already been subject to “temporary controls”, another Reuters article explained, quoting an expert as saying these temporary controls had “no significant impact on any industry”.
NEXT FRONTIER? Meanwhile, China is boosting its strategic reserves of cobalt, another important mineral in EV production, according to Bloomberg. The outlet noted that China agreed to buy 3,000 tonnes of cobalt at a recent meeting in Beijing between government officials and representatives from five producers and traders.
California governor meets Chinese leadership to talk climate
CALIFORNIA DREAMIN’: California governor Gavin Newsom met a series of top Chinese policymakers, most notably president Xi Jinping, in a trip “to promote climate cooperation”, NBC reported, adding that Newsom “received an unusually warm welcome”. State news agency Xinhua announced that Xi told Newsom that “China and the [US] have great potential for cooperation in…green development and combating climate change, and both sides are well positioned to…turn [this] into a new bright spot” of bilateral cooperation.
BRASS TACKS: Newsom also met environment minister Huang Runqiu at a climate dialogue, another NBC article said, adding that Huang pledged to uphold a China-California memorandum of understanding (MOU) on carbon markets, adaptation and other climate policy. Communist party-backed news outlet the People’s Daily also reported on the event, stating that several provincial leaders expressed their desire “to strengthen exchanges and cooperation with the California government in…clean energy”. Bloomberg reported that Newsom’s visit concluded in Shanghai with the signing of an MOU “on matters including environmental protection and combating climate change” with mayor Gong Zheng – and a visit to Tesla’s gigafactory.
SUNNY SIDE UP: Politico noted that Newsom announced Chinese and US climate envoys Xie Zhenhua and John Kerry would meet this week at the Sunnylands estate in California. China watchers noted this as the location of Xi’s first meeting with former US president Barack Obama in 2013, ahead of their joint climate pledge in 2014. (For more, see Carbon Brief’s “Nine key moments that changed China’s mind about climate change”.) Greenpeace’s Li Shuo said the return would “pave the ground for the Xi-Biden summit at APEC [Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation]”, which is due to take place in San Francisco later this month. The Communist party-affiliated newspaper People’s Daily published a commentary by Zhong Sheng – a nom de plume of the party leadership – that called for the US and China to improve ties and continue the type of cooperation that “[led] the way to the Paris agreement”.
EU DEALS: Meanwhile, Euronews reported that the EU has announced a “raft of new investment agreements” in the global south as part of its “global gateway” program, in areas including critical raw materials and green hydrogen. At the same time, the EU also “launched a wind power package…to counter the growing influence of China and spur its own industry”, Bloomberg said. Financial news outlet Yicai covered the official response from ministry of commerce (MOFCOM), which argued that “wind power products produced by Chinese enterprises have played an important role in accelerating the green transformation of the EU” and that it “firmly opposes” the EU’s “protectionist” behaviour. India is also “investigating 40 Chinese solar companies”, another Yicai article reported, which links the move to India’s desire to protect its solar industry from “dumping” – although an article in energy newspaper IN-EN.com pointed out that other countries’ solar companies were also being investigated.
China’s veteran climate envoy ‘set to retire’
XIE OUT: China’s climate change envoy Xie Zhenhua “is set to retire…at the end of this year’s COP28 climate talks”, according to Reuters. Both Reuters and a separate article by Bloomberg revealed that his replacement may be veteran diplomat Liu Zhenmin, a former vice minister for foreign affairs and UN under-secretary-general who “has been involved in past UN climate talks, taking part in Kyoto Protocol and Paris Agreement negotiations”. In a recent speech by Liu, he emphasised the need to “prioritise practical actions on climate change” and for developed countries to better support developing countries in their energy transitions. (See more below.)
XIA IN: Online newspaper the Paper reported that the ministry of ecology and environment (MEE) appointed a new director for its climate change department, Xia Yingxian. Xia previously “served as deputy permanent representative of China to the United Nations Environment Program” and “won international awards for his notable contributions to protecting the ozone layer and phasing out ozone depleting substances”, the newspaper explained. Xia replaced Li Gao, who was transferred to the environment and resources protection committee of the National People’s Congress, according to economic newspaper Jiemian. State-run newspaper the China Daily also covered the press conference, noting that Xia said that COP28 should assess “the gap in developed nations’ implementation of the Paris treaty and whether they had taken the lead in cutting carbon emissions and fulfilled their obligations to support developing countries”.
China releases report on its progress addressing climate change
PROGRESS REPORT: Xia’s climate change department at the MEE also released its annual report on China’s policies and actions to address climate change, said the People’s Daily. The report revealed that carbon emission intensity levels between 2005 and 2022 dropped by more than 51%, that non-fossil energy was contributing 17.5% of China’s consumption at the end of 2022 and that, as of mid-2023, “new energy” vehicle ownership reached 16.2m units, “accounting for more than half of the world”, the news outlet said. A separate press conference by the national energy administration (NEA) announced that China had added 172GW of installed renewable capacity between January and September 2023, an increase of 93% year-on-year, according to power news outlet China Electricity News, which explained that the NEA pledged to plan and maintain the supply of power over the winter peak period.
SOUTH-SOUTH SOLIDARITY: China has also “signed 48 memorandums of understanding on “south-south” cooperation on climate change” and “implemented 75 projects on climate change mitigation and adaptation” with developing countries as of September 2023, the report continued. The outlet also included comments from Xia’s press conference (see above) that COP28 should include “a comprehensive and balanced assessment of the progress and gaps in the global implementation of the Paris Agreement”, mobilisation of the $100bn climate finance pledged to developing countries, development of a loss and damages fund and promotion of “a just and green transition”.
Spotlight
Why China’s slowdown could drive a peak in fossil fuels and emissions
China’s economic slowdown will have major implications for global energy and emissions trends, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA) World Energy Outlook 2023. In this issue, Carbon Brief looks at what is changing in China – and what it means for the world.
What does the World Energy Outlook say about China?
Every year, Carbon Brief takes a deep dive into the latest IEA World Energy Outlook, producing in-depth coverage of the key findings – and the ways the outlook has shifted.
This year, the IEA highlights the impact of structural shifts in China, with knock-on implications for the whole world due to its “outsize influence on global energy trends”.
As IEA executive director Dr Fatih Birol told Carbon Brief in September, China was responsible for about two-thirds of global oil demand growth over the past decade, one-third of gas growth, more than 90% of coal demand growth and 85% of the rise in CO2 emissions.
The country’s “epoch-making” economic expansion over the past few decades has “changed the energy world”, the IEA says, but now “China is changing”. The report explains:
“China, which has an outsize influence on global energy trends, is undergoing a major shift as its economy slows and undergoes structural changes.”
China already has “world-class infrastructure”, narrowing the scope for further growth in physical assets – even before the ongoing strains in the country’s property sector. Moreover, China’s working-age population peaked in 2015 and is expected to fall 20% by 2050.
As a result, China’s economic growth is slowing and shifting towards less carbon-intensive sectors. The IEA reflects these changing expectations by cutting the outlook for average GDP growth to 3.9% per year until 2030, some 0.8 points lower than expected last year.
What does China’s slowdown mean for energy use and emissions?
These economic changes will have major implications for China’s energy demand and emissions.
To date, the expansion of low-carbon energy sources has been too slow to keep pace with rising demand for energy overall, with fossil fuels picking up the slack.
Now, decades of rapid energy demand growth are coming to an end, with the IEA pointing to a peak in China’s energy demand “around the middle of this decade”. Last year it had said a peak in energy demand – and CO2 emissions – would not come until “just before 2030”.
With China continuing to see “dynamic growth in clean energy”, its demand for fossil fuels is set to peak in 2024 and then enter structural decline, according to the outlook.
(Carbon Brief’s next quarterly analysis of trends in China’s energy use and emissions – as well as their near-term prospects – will feature in the 16 November issue of China Briefing.)
The decline in China’s fossil fuel demand will be driven by lower coal use. The IEA sees China’s coal demand falling nearly as quickly over the rest of this decade – by an average of 53m tonnes of coal equivalent (Mtce) per year – as it grew in the last (61Mtce per year).
By 2030, the IEA expects Chinese coal use to fall by 422Mtce, which is roughly equivalent to twice the current demand of the EU. This would leave China’s coal use in 2030 some 13% below 2022 levels – and nearly 100Mtce lower than the agency expected last year.
While China’s gas use would continue climbing – and its oil demand would only peak later this decade – coal would send China’s total fossil fuel use and CO2 emissions into decline.
What would happen if China builds more solar than expected?
Much of the expected drop in China’s coal use is concentrated in the electricity sector, where demand is set to fall 16% by 2030. China’s coal-fired electricity generation would fall by 874 terawatt hours (TWh), roughly equivalent to the total output of the US coal fleet.
The decline is expected to be steeper than the IEA thought just a year ago. This is despite the electrification of China’s economy going faster, with two out of every three cars sold in 2030 set to be electric rather than the one out of two expected last year.
The IEA now sees China generating an extra 820TWh of electricity from solar in 2030 – up 56% on last year’s estimate – and an extra 420TWh from wind (+27%).
These changes would be sufficient to push China’s CO2 emissions down to 11.3bn tonnes of CO2 (GtCO2) by 2030, 7% below 2022 levels, whereas last year it only saw a 2% cut.
Yet the IEA notes that these shifts could happen even more quickly than it expects in its main “stated policies scenario” (STEPS), reflecting current government policy settings.
China’s solar manufacturing sector is surging, it notes, creating potential for even faster solar growth. This could see China building 400GW of solar per year by 2030, instead of 270GW.
If this extra solar can be integrated into the grid, it would cut China’s coal generation in 2030 by a further 20%, the IEA says, shaving another US-sized coal fleet off global demand.
Another case explored by the IEA is if China’s economic slowdown goes more quickly, with “slower but ultimately ‘higher quality’ growth”. In this “low” case, China’s emissions would fall a further 0.8bn tonnes of CO2 (GtCO2) in 2030 to 10.5GtCO2, to 15% below 2022 levels.
Coal use would fall by an amount equal to Europe’s total, oil imports would fall by 5% and liquified natural gas (LNG) by 20%, with “major implications for global [trade] balances”.
In a “high” economic growth case, China’s emissions would still peak by 2030 – but 0.8GtCO2 higher than in the central scenario, mainly due to stronger coal demand.
Watch, read, listen
CLIMATE TALK: The Center for China and Globalization published remarks from climate envoy Xie Zhenhua’s possible successor, Liu Zhenmin, as well as the US, EU and UAE ambassadors to China, on multilateral climate cooperation.
RED LINES: The China Stories podcast narrated an article from the China Project exploring the potential and limitations of China’s use of “ecological conservation red lines” to protect local ecosystems.
CBAM: Envision CEO and wind energy billionaire Zhang Lei spoke in Ordos about how the EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism and other policies created “invisible carbon barriers” to trade, and how China should develop zero carbon industrial parks to circumvent these barriers.
EXTREME WEATHER: State-run newspaper the China Daily published a short video interviewing top scientists on the link between climate change and extreme weather.
New science
Atmospheric Environment
A new study found that, according to 2015 data, emissions of sulphur dioxide, nitric oxide and black carbon from coal sources accounted for more than half of the total anthropogenic emissions in China. The researchers added that the phase-out of coal use could lead to the concentrations of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide and fine particulate matter decreasing by approximately 30-50%.
Sustainability
New research explored the effect of ESG disclosure mechanisms on corporate carbon performance. Using data from heavily polluting companies in China, they found that corporate carbon performance increased by 1.2% for each level of ESG disclosure enacted.
China Briefing is compiled by Anika Patel and edited by Wanyuan Song and Simon Evans. Please send tips and feedback to china@carbonbrief.org.
The post China Briefing 2 November: Fossil fuel peak in 2024; Graphite curbs; Xie to ‘retire’ appeared first on Carbon Brief.
China Briefing 2 November: Fossil fuel peak in 2024; Graphite curbs; Xie to ‘retire’
Climate Change
Corpus Christi Cuts Timeline to Disaster as Abbott Issues Emergency Orders
The governor’s office said the city’s two main reservoirs could dry up by May, much sooner than previous timelines. But authorities still offer no plan for curtailment of water use.
City officials in Corpus Christi on Tuesday released modeling that showed emergency cuts to water demand could be required as soon as May as reservoir levels continue to decline.
Corpus Christi Cuts Timeline to Disaster as Abbott Issues Emergency Orders
Climate Change
Middle East war is another wake-up call for fossil fuel-reliant food systems
Lena Luig is the head of the International Agricultural Policy Division at the Heinrich Böll Foundation, a member of the Global Alliance for the Future of Food. Anna Lappé is the Executive Director of the Global Alliance for the Future of Food.
As toxic clouds loom over Tehran and Beirut from the US and Israel’s bombardment of oil depots and civilian infrastructure in the region’s ongoing war, the world is once again witnessing the not-so-subtle connections between conflict, hunger, food insecurity and the vulnerability of global food systems dependent on fossil fuels, dominated by a few powerful countries and corporations.
The conflict in Iran is having a huge impact on the world’s fertilizer supply. The Strait of Hormuz is a critical trade route in the region for nearly half of the global supply of urea, the main synthetic fertilizer derived from natural gas through the conversion of ammonia.
With the Strait impacted by Iran’s blockades, prices of urea have shot up by 35% since the war started, just as planting season starts in many parts of the world, putting millions of farmers and consumers at risk of increasing production costs and food price spikes, resulting in food insecurity, particularly for low-income households. The World Food Programme has projected that an extra 45 million people would be pushed into acute hunger because of rises in food, oil and shipping costs, if the war continues until June.
Pesticides and synthetic fertilizer leave system fragile
On the face of it, this looks like a supply chain issue, but at the core of this crisis lies a truth about many of our food systems around the world: the instability and injustice in the very design of systems so reliant on these fossil fuel inputs for our food.
At the Global Alliance, a strategic alliance of philanthropic foundations working to transform food systems, we have been documenting the fossil fuel-food nexus, raising alarm about the fragility of a system propped up by fossil fuels, with 15% of annual fossil fuel use going into food systems, in part because of high-cost, fossil fuel-based inputs like pesticides and synthetic fertilizer. The Heinrich Böll Foundation has also been flagging this threat consistently, most recently in the Pesticide Atlas and Soil Atlas compendia.
We’ve seen this before: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 sparked global disruptions in fertilizer supply and food price volatility. As the conflict worsened, fertilizer prices spiked – as much from input companies capitalizing on the crisis for speculation as from real cost increases from production and transport – triggering a food price crisis around the world.
Since then, fertilizer industry profit margins have continued to soar. In 2022, the largest nine fertilizer producers increased their profit margins by more than 35% compared to the year before—when fertilizer prices were already high. As Lena Bassermann and Dr. Gideon Tups underscore in the Heinrich Böll Foundation’s Soil Atlas, the global dependencies of nitrogen fertilizer impacted economies around the world, especially state budgets in already indebted and import-dependent economies, as well as farmers across Africa.
Learning lessons from the war in Ukraine, many countries invested heavily in renewable energy and/or increased domestic oil production as a way to decrease dependency on foreign fossil fuels. But few took the same approach to reimagining domestic food systems and their food sovereignty.
Agroecology as an alternative
There is another way. Governments can adopt policy frameworks to encourage reductions in synthetic fertilizer and pesticide use, especially in regions that currently massively overuse nitrogen fertilizer. At the African Union fertilizer and Soil Health Summit in 2024, African leaders at least agreed that organic fertilizers should be subsidized as well, not only mineral fertilizers, but we can go farther in actively promoting agricultural pathways that reduce fossil fuel dependency.
In 2024, the Global Alliance organized dozens of philanthropies to call for a tenfold increase in investments to help farmers transition from fossil fuel dependency towards agroecological approaches that prioritize livelihoods, health, climate, and biodiversity.
In our research, we detail the huge opportunity to repurpose harmful subsidies currently supporting inputs like synthetic fertilizer and pesticides towards locally-sourced bio-inputs and biofertilizer production. We know this works: There are powerful stories of hope and change from those who have made this transition, despite only receiving a fraction of the financing that industrial agriculture receives, with evidence of benefits from stable incomes and livelihoods to better health and climate outcomes.
New summit in Colombia seeks to revive stalled UN talks on fossil fuel transition
Inspiring examples abound: G-BIACK in Kenya is training farmers how to produce their own high-quality compost; start-ups like the Evola Company in Cambodia are producing both nutrient-rich organic fertilizer and protein-rich animal feed with black soldier fly farming; Sabon Sake in Ghana is enriching sugarcane bagasse – usually organic waste – with microbial agents and earthworms to turn it into a rich vermicompost.
These efforts, grounded in ecosystems and tapping nature for soil fertility and to manage pest pressures, are just some of the countless examples around the world, tapping the skill and knowledge of millions of farmers. On a national and global policy level, the Agroecology Coalition, with 480+ members, including governments, civil society organizations, academic institutions, and philanthropic foundations, is supporting a transition toward agroecology, working with natural systems to produce abundant food, boost biodiversity, and foster community well-being.
Fertilizer industry spins “clean” products
We must also inoculate ourselves from the fertilizer industry’s public relations spin, which includes promoting the promise that their products can be produced without heavy reliance on fossil fuels. Despite experts debunking the viability of what the industry has dubbed “green hydrogen” or “green or clean ammonia”, the sector still promotes this narrative, arguing that these are produced with resource-intensive renewable energy or Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), a costly and unreliable technology for reducing emissions.
As we mourn this conflict’s senseless destruction and death, including hundreds of children, we also recognize that peace cannot mean a return to business-as-usual. We need to upend the systems that allow the richest and most powerful to have dominion over so much.
This includes fighting for a food system that is based on genuine sovereignty and justice, free from dependency on fossil fuels, one that honors natural systems and puts power into the hands of communities and food producers themselves.
The post Middle East war is another wake-up call for fossil fuel-reliant food systems appeared first on Climate Home News.
Middle East war is another wake-up call for fossil fuel-reliant food systems
Climate Change
Are There Climate Fingerprints in Tornado Activity?
Parts of the Southern and Northeastern U.S. faced tornado threats this week. Scientists are trying to parse out the climate links in changing tornado activity.
It’s been a weird few weeks for weather across the United States.
-
Greenhouse Gases7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Renewable Energy2 years ago
GAF Energy Completes Construction of Second Manufacturing Facility


