Connect with us

Published

on

Carbon Credit Insurance Market to Hit $1B in 2030, $30B by 2050

Insurance has a crucial role to play in supporting carbon markets as the world continues its journey to net zero. A report estimates that by 2030, insurance premiums could reach ~$1 billion and 2030 and $10-$30 billion by 2050.  

The report is a collaboration between Oxbow Partners and Kita, titled “Are carbon credits the next billion-dollar insurance market?”

Premiums with a Purpose: The Role of Carbon Credit Insurance

The study emphasizes the crucial role of insurance in supporting the carbon market amid global efforts to combat climate change. It also provides a comprehensive overview of the carbon market’s potential, offering valuable insights for industry experts. 

According to the report, insurance can provide 4 key benefits to the carbon credit market: 

  • A balance between traditional risk management practices and innovation – enabling improved access to finance to scale carbon projects. 
  • A stamp of confidence – risk management and regulatory expertise, honed over decades, can bring confidence to the market and its participants. 
  • Detailed assessment of carbon project risk – highlighting areas of concern across the market and project types, where wider risk management improvements are required. 
  • Encourage market participants to take risks – insurers take on responsibility when things go wrong, giving market actors the freedom to take risks which are necessary to release capital and scale carbon projects and their associated benefits. 

Below are the risks identified in the report, which the insurance market could mitigate.

risks associated with carbon projectsIndustry leaders, including prominent brokers and insurers such as Aon, Howden, Marsh, AXA XL, CFC, Chaucer, and Fidelis, are optimistic about the market’s prospects, viewing its expansion as inevitable. These industry giants think that the carbon credit insurance explosive growth isn’t a matter of “not if” but “when”.

Miqdaad Versi, Head of the Sustainability Practice at Oxbow Partners, expressed optimism about the market’s potential. He particularly highlighted its importance in facilitating green initiatives while generating profits. While James Kench, Head of Insurance at Kita, added that: 

“The insurance market is on the front line for climate risk and is uniquely placed to help business and society navigate through increasingly uncertain times. This report is a call to action for the insurance industry to embrace a vast new carbon risk pool with purpose.”

The Billion-Dollar Horizon

The report forecasts the total addressable market for carbon credit insurance to reach about $1 billion in annual Gross Written Premium (GWP) by 2030, with a projected increase to $10-30 billion GWP by 2050. 

carbon credit insurance marketHowever, this estimate may underestimate the market’s full-scale potential. The calculations focus solely on the voluntary carbon market (VCM), excluding the compliance market. 

In 2023, the global Compliance Carbon Markets were valued at over $800 billion. These markets are closely linked to policy shifts and geopolitical tensions, leading to fluctuations in their size and growth trajectory depending on external factors and the prevailing environment.

In 2022, the VCM was valued at $2 billion. However, Abatable, a carbon intelligence and procurement platform, estimated that in the same year, deals worth $10 billion were executed. This implies that investment into the market was about 5x the value of the carbon credits issued.

According to a Barclays Special Report, the VCM could grow to $250 billion by 2030. Various organizations have made predictions of VCM growth in 2030, with estimates ranging from $10 billion to $250 billion. The complexity, rapid evolution, and convergence of the markets make size predictions challenging. 

However, even the lowest forecasts anticipate the market to grow 5x. Long-term predictions are optimistic, with some expecting the market to exceed a trillion dollars by 2050.

Currently, the VCM predominantly covers credits sold by carbon dioxide removal (CDR) projects. 

McKinsey estimates that based on expected delivery of announced projects, the CDR market could reach $40-$80 billion by 2030. As the CDR industry scales up, which overlaps with the VCM, it’s likely to further stimulate market growth. 

VCM and compliance market size comparison

So, if the VCM and compliance carbon markets converge as expected, it would lead to a substantial market expansion. 

Addressing Risks in the Carbon Market

The GWP opportunity covers a broad spectrum of insurance needs within the carbon market sector. This includes specialized insurance for carbon credits as well as traditional insurance lines necessary for carbon projects and businesses operating in this sector. For instance, construction, property, casualty, financial lines, and marine insurance, among others. 

While the report’s long-term prospects for the insurance industry are optimistic, their approach in estimating the potential market opportunity was conservative. 

The authors also discounted the potential impact of regulatory mandates requiring insurance and the merging of both markets. Their estimation was also based on the projected annual carbon credit market, rather than the additional investment required to produce these credits themselves. Factoring in the latter could potentially result in a multiple of 3-5x if applied on top.

Indeed, the rapidly evolving carbon markets present a complex landscape, characterized by unique risks and significant challenges. However, the presence of insurance within these markets is paramount for their exponential growth. 

The introduction of insurance mechanisms can effectively address risks, enhance confidence among investors, and consequently stimulate increased investment. This, in turn, will enable the markets to scale at the necessary rate to align with global emission reduction targets and effectively combat climate change.

The post Carbon Credit Insurance Market to Hit $1B in 2030, $30B by 2050 appeared first on Carbon Credits.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living

Published

on

Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.

For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.

Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.

The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.

More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)

Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.

Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.

Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:

  • Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
  • Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
  • Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
  • Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs

The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?

How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs

There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.

Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)

According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)

In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)

The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)

After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)

For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.

How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

A light bulb, a pen, a calculator and some copper euro cent coins lie on top of an electricity bill

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.

Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.

Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)

As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)

These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)

Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)

For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.

How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates

On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.

Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.

As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)

While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.

How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes

Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.

The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.

These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.

Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action

While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.

While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.

For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:

  1. Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
  2. Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
  3. Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.

Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.

Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.

The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance

Published

on

A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.

Continue Reading

Carbon Footprint

Industries with the biggest nature footprints and what their decarbonisation looks like

Published

on

A corporate carbon footprint is never just an accounting figure. It maps onto real ecosystems. Before a product leaves the factory gate, something on the ground has already paid the cost. A forest has been converted. A river has been depleted. A patch of savannah that was once home to dozens of species now grows a single crop in every direction.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com