Weather Guard Lightning Tech

Business Development in Wind with Joel Saxum
Weather Guard Lightning Tech’s Chief Commercial Officer, Joel Saxum, gives his view of the state of the wind energy business from the perspective of a business development executive. The IRA bill is changing the way businesses are planning, working, and being acquired in the United States. Will that trend continue? And with the current lack of technicians, how do wind energy companies grow their businesses? This is an enlightening discussion sure to sparks conversations at the water cooler (or wind turbine).
Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly email update on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary Barnes’ YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!
Pardalote Consulting – https://www.pardaloteconsulting.com
Weather Guard Lightning Tech – www.weatherguardwind.com
Intelstor – https://www.intelstor.com
Joel Saxum Interview
Allen Hall: I’m Allen Hall, and I’m here with my good friend, JoelSaxum, and on this special edition of the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast, we’re here to talk with Joel, who has recently joined Weather Guard Lightning Tech as our Chief Commercial Officer. And Joel has tremendous knowledge in the wind industry and what has happened over the last couple of years.
And today we get to pick Joel’s brain. And get a sense of where we have gone, where we are at, and where we are likely headed in the next year or two. So Joel, welcome to the program.
Joel Saxum: Welcome, I suppose, for the, I don’t know, the hundredth time or so, maybe? It’s, it’s close to that at this point. Yeah, so Allen and I were talking in the background off air, talking about, you know, what, what is actually happening out there right now.
It’d be nice to kind of drop a little bit of knowledge of. Of what, of course, I’m hearing in the, in the BD circles everybody seems to be connected somehow in this industry. And then also the general trends, all right? And we will touch on a couple of things here.
Allen Hall: So if we go back two years ago to ACP in San Antonio, which is really kind of the first real kickoff.
I know we had O& M previous to that. I think, I think that’s right, right? So we had O& M in San Diego. And, and at that point in the industry, everybody was just coming out of COVID. Those were really some of the first events, right? We had, if we all remember in San Antonio, we had COVID tests before we could walk into the building.
And what fun that was. And at that point in the, in the industry, it was like, everybody was just trying to come awake again. There was a little bit of discontinuity between organizations. You could feel that everybody’s just trying to feel the way around. And technician wise, it seemed, it did seem like there was a huge competition for technicians, like, like we have seen now.
And then as we progressed over the last year or two, it’s really, I think, changed dramatically in terms of the number of players in the marketplace. Even if you look at the number of drone companies that we saw a couple of years ago versus today, dramatically different. In, in terms of just sort of the knowledge base is still see the same key people around in terms of like the, the business development side, it has been a little bit of a rough road, right?
Even with the IRA bill has been a little bit of a rough road.
Joel Saxum: Yeah, absolutely. So, I mean, the IRA bill was designed to spur on projects, right? They say that we’ll, we’re going to get PTC back funds back the case, basically credits back basically back the same way they were. Before the IRA bill was passed, so, you know, every 10 years put X amount of dollars into your wind farms, get them up and running again, and you’ll re qualify for these credits, which I think are like 2.
8 cents per kilowatt hour or something right now. And then on the heels of that was also the ITC which is investment tax credits, which was a 30 percent tax break on things that qualify for it that are in the renewables industry, but built here in the U. S. So it was designed to spur these things on.
Now, to get the economic machine moving, it doesn’t happen overnight. That bill was passed last August, I think, Allen, if I’m correct. So we’re 14 months past it now. And if you look at some of the charts and graphs that the DOE’s put out, you’ll see a lot of little dots and pins put in maps all over the place in the U. S. based on who is taking advantage of it, right? Like who’s, who’s making products and, and starting manufacturing facilities. So we’ve even seen, I guess, like here up in my, my, my home state of Wisconsin the ship builder now, so that even that in it, it’s an offshore As fact, in Crowley building a vessel up here for offshore east coast us.
So that ITC idea in the bill, there has spurred on some, some movement. We’ve talked about some others on the podcast about, you know, a tower factory down in I think it was New Mexico. And some others taking advantage of it as well. You’re finally in the BD world, you’re finally starting to see that happen.
You’re starting to see things where people are going, Oh, well, this person’s now doing a repower because they weren’t quite sure before. I know of one operator where they have Ooh, I think eight or ten repowers that they plan on doing in the next three to four years that weren’t on the docket before the PTC.
Or before the IRA bill and the PTC, new PTC funds were there and these fund farms aren’t the 10 year old ones. They’re 17, 18, 19 year old wind farms that they may even put all new technology on, right? Take the whole nacelle off and put a new nacelle on. So with that will come a ton of work, right? So from cranes to.
It go all the way down to the people that support on the ground getting mats and cribbing and bearings major corrective exchange smart people that do that new gearboxes you know, unfortunately, some of those components will have to come from overseas. But we’ll be all, you know, U. S.
labor installing all of those here and, and hopefully as the ITC credits kick off and we build more things here in country more and more of those components get built here as well.
Allen Hall: Does that, shift in the industry in terms of hardware translate this year, next year? I, I, cause I, I feel like we’re still three, four, five years out.
On the effects of it, just because of the time it takes to build a factory, to build a ship, to… Make a tower factory it it’s slow.
Joel Saxum: I think full swing to feel the real economic impact of it Will be we will be so far removed from the bill passing that you’ll just feel like it’s normal again, right? Like you say like two three years down the road It could be things kicking off and that were really actually tied to the the IRA bill But at that point in time you won’t even really feel it because it’ll just be this is how we do business now because that’s The IRA bills in place for it’ll be in place for a long time So the, the smaller components, the lighter things are happening now, but it’ll take it, but it’ll take a little bit for the major components stuff.
Yeah.
Allen Hall: Right. Even though there’s a lot of talk about offshore wind, because that’s where a lot of the, the auction money obviously is big numbers, make headlines and some of the contracts and the PPAs that are bouncing around there make the news. But the vast majority of, of wind in America is, is onshore and that’s where the action is at the moment.
Right?
Joel Saxum: Yeah, absolutely. That’s actually when I was taking notes for, to, to chat with you today, that was one of the things I put on there. It’s like my second bullet point and focus. The focus in news is offshore wind in the U S it’s this pretty shiny new glittery thing that’s in everybody’s face, but don’t forget onshore, right?
We’ve got 70, 000 plus turbines in the U S. And that is where 99. 99 percent of the action is happening commercially in the, in the United States. That’s where all the, all the companies are working, all the service companies, all the ISPs most all of the parts. Like I said, there is, there is some stuff happening offshore, but the bulk of the economic wind engines here in the States is still securely in the onshore world.
Allen Hall: And that drives all the way down to companies that do crane work and the heavy lift, replacing generators and all those companies you don’t really hear about. I know we put out a recent post asking the industry, Hey, identify these key players in the U. S. industry, U. S. wind industry that are actually based in the United States.
And that list got really short, right? The number of feed, the feedback on that was extremely limited and I know better. I know there’s a lot more players in it, but they don’t. Interact like sort of we do, and they don’t say, Hey, we’re doing this project in Colorado. You just don’t hear anything about it, which is.
Very odd, I think, especially in light of the IRA bill, that you would want to make a little more noise.
Joel Saxum: I think the existing, the existing people in the market, right? Your, you know, your, your Barnharts, your IEAs, DWT, Blattner, all these big companies, the Pearce and, and, and TAKKION. They’re so flush with work right now that they really don’t have to be out chasing stuff, right?
While I don’t want to take this away from this, the, from other people as well, it seems to me that We almost have a little bit of a problem in this industry, and it’s not specific to the wind industry. It is specific to any… industry. If you watch innovation cycles, say in the in the late nineties, early two thousands, it seemed like everybody was starting up a, if you were out in California, right?
Everybody’s starting up this dot com boom. Everybody’s got a little company doing something on the internet. Well, there’s a few of them that rose to the top and a lot of them that got either acquired or just passed by because either their product was not good, didn’t have customer support or whatever.
Innovation cycle happens in all industries. Right, that innovation cycle happened in the auto industry in 1920, 30, 40. How many auto manufacturers were there that just aren’t around anymore and they’ve all either consolidated or, you know, the products went off and that happens in, in, in almost every industry that grows right now, we’re in that in the U S where you see a lot of places you see, you know, every Tom, Nick and Harry starting up a company that, Oh, we do this.
Oh, we do that. On the, at the same time, if you start a company and you don’t have the, you know, the HSE stuff in place and the quality things in place, like you’re going to run into a lot of teething pains, you’re going to hurt, you’re going to feel a lot of pain for a long time. And you can start to see some of these people doing that at the same time of this wicked shortage of labor and even greater shortage of good and trained educated labor that knows what they’re doing, where you don’t have to go and teach everybody everything all the time.
So you have companies that are starting up that might have one or two good smart people in them, and then they brought along a bunch of friends to try to start this thing, and they’re either… And getting in, getting contracts, screwing them up. Other people have to come in and kind of rescue them or there’s quality issues or HSE issues.
And, and so the, the large companies, the OEMs, the big asset owners that are, you know, need all these, these services are getting, Quite bent out of shape about the quality that they’re getting. So while we’re sitting here going, there’s so much work, so much work, so much work, which is true. And everybody’s like, well, I’m sorry to company I’ll do this.
I’ll do that. But then you go to the, the, the people that are using the services and they’re not happy with the results. So you have a kind of a. A weird thing going on there where now, even though there’s all kinds of work to be had, these smaller companies are going like, where is it at? Whereas the big companies are just flush with it.
They’re soaking it in and they’re looking at high need people. So you’re starting to see, I think you’ll see more consolidation of companies. I think you’ll see Tachyon and Pierce and these big guys buying up some of the smaller ones or some of the smaller ones joining together. Just simply because the people that are hiring them are looking for…
strategic suppliers, because they don’t want to deal with this rash of massive issues in the field. They want to deal with one person that can take care of all their problems. So they want to deal with one person, whether it’s, Hey, I got a blade issue, or I need an inspection done, or I have a main bearing that’s, you know, gone, or I have an oil leak or whatever.
They don’t want to have to, I got to call this contractor, got to call this one. I got to call that one and figure this out. It’s that, that’s getting dialed back. You’re starting to see it in RFQs too. I just looked at one the other day that was like, Yeah. You can have sub suppliers, but we don’t want to manage them and we’d rather you not like there was points for not using sub suppliers in it.
And, and, and to me that makes, it makes sense. But that will drive some consolidation because people need resources. If you’re. A, I don’t know, Allen Energy, and you need all of a sudden your biggest client comes you says, Hey, I need someone to change out pitch rams. Well, you don’t have that capability.
Well, I don’t know. Let’s go look for a company that does and scoop them up.
Allen Hall: Yeah. It does seem like that in the United States at the moment, there is a lot of moving and shaking that is below the radar. That you hear about it at conferences, you run into people and say, Hey, did you know that this company is going to maybe acquired by that company that they’re looking to, to, to join up in Europe.
It seems like most of those transactions have already happened that unless you bring something really unique to the marketplace that has not been seen before, that it just doesn’t seem to, to move anybody. And maybe that’s just a different sort of business environment. U. S. versus Europe, but it does seem like the Europeans have shaken this whole system down a little bit and have found the companies are going to be around a while and then focused.
And I agree with you. In the United States, we’re still in that shakedown period. We’re trying to figure out who’s here for the long term and who’s just testing the water a little bit. And does that then force like the operators to be a little more leery of what’s happening? Of, do they, do they do a lot more vetting of these companies?
Are they looking for insurance products to come along with it? Are they monitoring the sites closely when repair work is going on? What are they doing?
Joel Saxum: Well, I think you’re a hundred percent correct on this, the, the acquisition portion, Europe versus America. American, right, America right now is… Grow, grow, grow as fast as you can.
We’re grabbing companies because you need resources. Well, whereas in Europe, it’s more We’ll grab a, we’ll grab a country, company strategically. Strategically being like maybe we’re looking to sell our group and we need to add in some capabilities or something like that. Whereas in the U S it’s just a revenue chase, right?
Everybody like this work is going to be here. I have a shot at it. If I don’t go grab people, I’m not going to get it. So we’re, we’re just not as we’re not as mature. The industry isn’t as mature here as it is there. But back to your, your question about what are the asset owners, the OEMs doing from what I’ve seen, the tender processes are getting more difficult.
They’re asking for again, more references, more, more track record. Like if you don’t have a track record, you might as well not even, I mean, it’s tough to get in on some of these because you’re competing against some good competition, right? If you’re looking for a major OEM or a major asset owner, and you’re a drone company, like XYZ Drone Company isn’t going to get it.
It’s going to be a Zeitview, a SkySpecs, a Thread, like someone, someone that’s there and, and is established now because that industry is there. If you’re a a blade repair company but you’ve only been around a year, unless you know someone in high places, good luck because they, these large companies have been burned so bad so many times that people just aren’t willing to stick their neck out.
Because what ends up happening there, and I’ll go, let me, let me shift gears a little bit, what ends up happening within that, that large company, that asset owner, that OEM, is when they bring on a subcontractor that doesn’t fulfill their needs. It creates strain within their own organization, let alone not getting their product done.
So the blade repairs may not get done, may not get done to quality, but you’re also putting a lot of stress on your internal people. So if you’ve got a site manager that has to manage one person on site or one or two subcontractors, that’s not too bad. But when that one guy on site has to, or guy or gal on site has to manage five different subcontractors and he’s got to be in their operations because they’re not that good at what they’re doing.
And. helping them rig up their platforms or whatever. And he’s just like, why am I paying for you guys to be out here when I have to tell you how to do your job? That happens way more than it should in the wind industry. So what happens is, is these site managers and site supervisors and things, they start getting overloaded.
They start quitting. They start looking because they’re, they’re, then they’re yelling up the chain. Hey, I don’t have enough resources here to manage all these people. And then the people up there, the upper guys that are given the contracts like, Oh, well, you shouldn’t be any problem. You got 30 guys out there that are doing your blade repairs.
Yeah. And I got to manage all of them, you know, so you’re, you’re starting to see, like, I, I, I’ve talked with people, I’ve seen resumes come across from, from OEMs. Hey, like I’m, I’ve just had enough, like I’m done here, you know, like look at what GE just did not too long ago, taking it from all site people to go into hubs.
The, how their job, how all of those people’s jobs changed immediately. And they may have said, well, you were in charge of this wind farm or you were on this one. Now you’re on these four. Man, it’s overloaded. A lot of a lot of people in the field talking about how the managers are struggling a bit with having to deal with just too much.
Allen Hall: Yeah. And that, I guess sort of gets into the next question, which is about technicians, right? So everybody’s getting strained. There seems to be a real lack of technicians, particularly technicians with experience, and we know how tough the industry can be. It’s sort of a young person’s game at the minute, because if you’re fixing blades or out in the middle of West Texas working on stuff, it’s not particularly easy to do, and the industry, I think because it has Doesn’t have a lot of exposure.
That’s a hard time recruiting new talent. And from a business development standpoint, that that’s a real limiting factor on your rate of growth.
Joel Saxum: Yeah, absolutely. I mean, you’re, you’re, you, you, you run businesses two ways usually, right? Demand. On the business side drives demand on the operation side or demand on the operation side drives demand on the business side and you can go either way, right?
You, you pick your poison, however, signing contracts where you don’t have people in them is or don’t have people for them at that point in time. is almost always going to have quality issues, whether it’s quality, whether it’s HSE in the field, whether it’s quality of the work, the repair, the whatever, the communication, like so many times I’ve heard of, Oh yeah, well we got, I just, I need 20 people and you’re just grabbing them.
Here’s a truck head to Saskatchewan. You’re a commissioner now on a, on this project and they’re like, okay. They don’t know how to communicate within the organization, or even have their fuel card work while they’re traveling. That happens all the time. And it’s a black eye on the industry. So, again, this is a conversation I had with Chris this morning, Chris Gagnon.
You know, we’ve talked about on the podcast before about how do we get more people trained? How do we get, you know, there’s, and there’s people opening training facilities. You had Rob Renewables open up their facility in Chicago and, and a bunch of, you know, I know blade repair companies opening GWO training sites and stuff.
And that stuff is great. However, that gets the safety check boxes that doesn’t give people the technical skills they need. Technical skills they need, need to be taught at community colleges or in, you know, internal programs of that sort. And they’re having a hard time getting people just into those programs.
Those schools are. So when we’re sitting there going like we have a shortage of labor an even greater shortage of good trained labor that knows what they’re doing, retaining the techs is even harder once you have them in your company. So once we have a good tech in your company. This is from, from, from us or from me to the industry, treat them well, pay them on time.
Don’t make them hunt money. We see that stuff on LinkedIn. Oh, such and such. We’re hunting money from them. They won’t pay my invoices, you know? So get, that would be to me, if you’re going to scale and grow a company in the wind industry, specifically in the U. S., figure out the HR portion of your company as, and have a plan and have stuff in place before you start trying to scale up.
Because. You, you’ll, you’ll, you’ll be paying or stealing from Peter to pay Paul the whole time going why do we have this attrition rate? Why are these people leaving? Well, if you don’t have a good setup for them and you’re not treating them right it’s just not going to happen for you.
Allen Hall: Explain to me a little bit of valuations while we’re sort of talking topic of people and people turn it to valuations of companies.
And I do think there’s going to be a lot of mergers and acquisitions over the next 12 months based upon the noise we’re hearing. How does, how does that work? Because it does seem like the number of technicians you have in your stable is a part of the valuation process. So I take a technician times, you know, I have a hundred technicians are each valued at X.
I have a 10 engineers are each valued at Y that sort of, plus all the equipment I own, I guess, that in turns into a valuation, but there’s just, that doesn’t always align with what I’m seeing in some of these numbers on acquisitions.
Joel Saxum: Yeah, the tough thing here is, okay, so diving back and this is the base of the technician problem.
Every company operates, not technician problem, the technician conundrum, I’ll call it. Every company operates differently, right? So since wind is, especially, especially blade, blade repair. is such a seasonal market. Unless you’re a big company and you can send people to Brazil or Australia or whatever in the wintertime, you’re up here, you have a shoulder season.
You go up, you get busy as hell and then you kind of slack off. So what ends up happening is, instead of hiring employees, a lot of these companies hire contractors. Well, no intelligent contractor is going to sign an exclusive contract as a contractor unless they’re getting paid the whole year. And no company really wants to do that.
So the majority of these people are free agents month after month after month. So if I’m a blade technician, I might be working for, you know, company Y this week and company A next week. And I might have jumped because a dollar, I may have jumped because I didn’t like the guy I was working with. But either way, you can’t really count on that valuation wise, right?
Unless it was a stable of employees. What I’ve seen valuation wise in the wind industry. Is because there’s so many moving parts like that in different companies and to, to levelize it, to equalize it, you’re of course taking in the standard stuff or your debt, your, your your, your debt ratios, the team you have, those things don’t really turn into, or the team doesn’t really turn into dollars until you get to the end, but I’m seeing a Test.
Depending on who you are, a nine to 14 or a 10 to 15 times EBITDA as a valuation and good faith valuations or good faith additions in the wind industry, I’m starting to see go away when I talk to people. And the reason being is because the market is so volatile. You never know who’s going to get these contracts.
People are jumping around here, jumping around there. That your good faith, good faith being like, Oh, we did 5 million EBITDA this year. Next year we plan on doing seven. So we want to be valued at seven. That’s starting to raise people’s eyebrows a little bit. Still getting good multipliers for EBITDA.
You know, some industries it’s can be two and three ebitda, two ti two or three times ebitda. Tech industries I’ve seen 20 times ebitda, but the renewables and wind is still trading really well. So those that, that, you know, 10 to 15, 12 probably average multiplier for EBITDA is what people are shooting at ebitda, being earnings before income tax and depreciation and amortization.
So basically what’s your revenue minus your operating expenses?
Allen Hall: No. Does that then drive those EBITDA multipliers having looked at that at other industries anything above 10 is sort of a sweet number if you’re selling. If you’re, if you’re getting a multiple of 10 plus on your EBITDA, does that change the way you do business today?
Or should it change the way you do business today? To have that possible merger or acquisition occur so that you can make the magic happen.
Joel Saxum: Yeah. If you’re, if you’re above 10, you’re looking at a company that has on staff engineers. You’re looking at a company that has a good, good support all around, right?
So if you’re. Two guys running a company and you got six blade techs out there. Like you’re not at 10 multiple even a company, but if you are a company that has a dedicated back office person for travel, a dedicated fleet manager an actual engineering group, engineering staff that can support you through operations, if you have processes in place, if you’re ISO approved, if you have, you know, you’re, you’re in an HSE system, that’s been, if you’ve been vetted by, if you have an MSA with Siemens and Vestas, like those kinds of companies are in that 10 to 12.
EBITDA range, but that’s a company that can, that someone looks at and goes, well, they did 10 million in revenue or 20 million in revenue this year, and we believe we can get more and more and more. Well, then that’s someone that’s going to get a high EBITDA. But if someone’s just grabbing you to grab people, it’s not going to be that high.
Allen Hall: Do service agreements. Influence that eat about the service agreements, increase the multiplier. So if you have an agreement with G. E. or Siemens to do work for the next two years, does that really then help propel you into a more stable bracket than maybe a company that’s sort of looking for work month to month?
Joel Saxum: Absolutely. 100%. And, and. It’s not something that you can put a metric to. It’s not like, Oh, you have an at one MSA, you get one time X multiplier extra it. That’s a valuation thing. That’s where you have these big companies, these, you know, Boston consulting group and stuff like that, that you’ll hire. If you’re trying to sell, come on and say, and do a valuation.
And they’ll be able to tell the market, this is why we’re at a 12 or this is why we’re at an 11. And we have. And MSA good through 2026 with GE to do all of their, I don’t know, foundations or whatever your company does. Those, those MS, those master service agreements or ongoing agreements definitely play into the EBITDA multiplier sale.
Allen Hall: So looking at the existing landscape in terms of the business development side, what are real three key areas over the next six to 12 months that companies should be focused on?
Joel Saxum: I think your big one right now, okay, it’s fall. We know that tenders are coming out soon. It’s the beginning of October. So tenders will be out in the next two months for people who are on the ball.
If you’re a company that once worked on this spring, please don’t wait until January or February to put your tender out. But you’ll see tenders for everything, right? For whether it’s major correctives, whether it’s blade work, whatnot. Everybody’s getting their ducks in a row to start off next spring. And the spring season in the U. S., depending on where you are, Texas to… Montana starts in either end of February or May, somewhere in there, right? So everybody’s getting their ducks in a row right now to do tenders. So everybody that’s in the BD world is sharpening pencils, getting a proposal, templates ready, ready to rock to, to receive all these things.
And there’ll be anything from inspections to full blade repairs and, and whatnot. BD people busy with tenders in the next few months. So that’s the big one right now on the docket. You will also. Everybody else that’s chasing work is going, is going to be chasing people doing repowers because no matter what sector you fit into in the wind industry in the US, somehow your product or service more than likely is impacted by repowers.
Whether it’s bolt tensioning or cable sales or our buddies at 3S Lift selling lifts or, or ourselves. The selling strike tape, you know, I mean, it’s, it’s the, the, when those things are coming down, it’s some of the best opportunity to, to upgrade retrofit, get everything ready to, to go for the next 10 years for that wind farm.
So, you know, the, you’re starting to also see, here’s another one that’s kind of popping up, general contractor rep representatives for repowers. That’s the person to, to talk to if you know who those people are at, at these companies and you’re trying to speak with someone doing a repower, that’s a good one to chase.
So tender season is upon us. Also people that are chasing things are chasing getting ready for repower season and repowers can start earlier, right? Because if you’re, you can do crane work, you can start plucking stuff as long as, as long as things are ready to go. You’re not, usually not waiting for resins and epoxies to dry in certain temperatures or anything like that, so.
They’ll, they’re cycling all the time, but again the wind industry is kind of used to a slow winter fuel operation wise. So repowers tend to follow that same path.
Allen Hall: Okay. That’s really interesting. If I was going to choose number three, it’s getting yourself some technicians. Right now.
Joel Saxum: Yeah, yeah, absolutely the tough thing with that is okay, so I’m gonna give you here’s a theory for you Allen This is one of the theories I like or it’s not theory an idea. So when I was an oil and gas we used to operate this way.
I hired Allen Hall as a technician I would pay Allen Hall. I don’t know 70, 000 a year You would get, you’d get, you’d get, so you’d get 70, 000 a year. Okay. And you get that salary year round. So every two weeks you’d get your paycheck deposited. However, for that 70, 000, you owe me 200 days. So 200 days, because because we work in the field remote, it’s, you know, six, seven days a week on site, 200 days during the busy season or 180 days, or however you want to structure the contract.
You may, you may eat, you may eat through real, real fast in the summer, like between April and, and September, man, you might be at 180 days already. Well, that’s good for you. You made your salary. Now, every day that you work extra after that, then I give you, or every hour you work extra after that, then I give you what your hourly rate would be.
So there’s a possibility of a technician that’s working into Christmas. Or November making a really good year. But what that also does is that gives the, that maintains that employee. So you’re, you’re keeping him or her and you’re keeping them happy. They’ve got to, they’re not having to struggle to go, where am I going to go next?
Where am I going to go next? Cause you’re getting a paycheck every two weeks. So they work for you. They’re going to be more loyal to you. They have the possibility of making a bunch of money. And then the other side, the backside. Upside to the company is if you have a group of good people that you do this for and say you are slow, well, then you guys got to come into the office and you got to do training and or, and, or you’ve got to get kit ready.
You’ve got to test PPE. You’ve got to training is the big one. I always, I always like to do. But that’s how we used to do things in the oil and gas world because you’d have people because the jobs were cyclical and you might be out for three months at a crack and then home for a month. Well, you didn’t lose that person.
All the efforts you put into training them and, and getting them up to speed on your processes and how your company works. You didn’t lose that person. They’re there for you when, when you’re ready to go back out to the field. So it keeps them happy and it keeps you able to grow. So that’s, that’s a theory.
That’s how I, that’s, that’s how I used to pay people.
Allen Hall: That’s innovative for wind right now. I think a lot of it is just the hours you work, we’ll pay you and what you’re not working, we don’t pay you and we’ll see you next season, maybe. And I think that really hurts the industry more than you think.
Joel Saxum: Yeah.
Absolutely. So if it was me and I had a company and say, I say, I’m going to go blade repair company. If I had 10 blade teams, that means I’ve got 30 people, 25 people, the 10 leads on the teams. I would set this up. I’d say, Hey, the last three years you made an ad, you made 70 grand, 80 grand, 90 grand, whatever.
So I’m going to give you an average of this much, and that’s going to be your salary. And if you can do that for those key people, keep them around. Then it tends to actually trickle down to because the next guy in line likes working with this guy and he’s like, Hey man, if I do good, I can get that as well.
I can get a steady salary in the wind industry. That’s the kind of stuff we need because right now, like you said, You shouldn’t be going and finding technicians. That’s a BD job as well. Like everybody is a, everybody’s a recruiter in the wind industry, whether you’re client facing or not. So like, so you, you’ve got to be out there pounding the ground and what, and what it is is it’s, it’s attrition.
Like right now there’s no, you know, everybody’s left or getting close to, right, it’s October. So you, you don’t know, you may think you’ve got, you know, Joe and Jessica and Sarah and John for next spring, but you don’t know. Unless you secure them somehow.
Allen Hall: Yeah, it’s the industry. It’s such a fluctuation. I know we like to think of ourselves as being fully established and running full steam.
There are some weak spots and there’s some really good really good growth spots that I’ve seen over the last couple of months where I’m really have been impressed by the companies and the people. That they have assembled, and it’s, it’s sort of an inflection point, I think, in the U. S. industry, and it, Joel, it’s been really good to pick your brain on this, because we don’t get to talk a lot about business development and actually what’s actually happening on the street like this, and I think there’s a lot of, of interested listeners to this, and I’m really glad we had the time to spend together, so everybody this is gonna conclude this episode of the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast.
Check us out on all the major platforms, and If you like what Joel had to say today, leave him a comment or leave a five star rating for us on your podcast platform.
Renewable Energy
Wind Industry Operations: In Wind’s Next Chapter, Operations take center stage
Wind Industry Operations: In Wind’s Next Chapter, Operations take center stage
This exclusive article originally appeared in PES Wind 4 – 2025 with the title, Operations take center stage in wind’s next chapter. It was written by Allen Hall and other members of the WeatherGuard Lightning Tech team.
As aging fleets, shrinking margins, and new policies reshape the wind sector, wind energy operations are in the spotlight. The industry’s next chapter will be defined not by capacity growth, but by operational excellence, where integrated, predictive maintenance turns data into decisions and reliability into profit.
Wind farm operations are undergoing a fundamental transformation. After hosting hundreds of conversations on the Uptime Wind Energy Podcast, I’ve witnessed a clear pattern: the most successful operators are abandoning reactive maintenance in favor of integrated, predictive strategies. This shift isn’t just about adopting new technologies; it’s about fundamentally rethinking how we manage aging assets in an era of tightening margins and expanding responsibilities.
The evidence was overwhelming at this year’s SkySpecs Customer Forum, where representatives from over 75% of US installed wind capacity gathered to share experiences and strategies. The consensus was clear: those who integrate monitoring, inspection, and repair into a cohesive operational strategy are achieving dramatic improvements in reliability and profitability.
Takeaway: These options have been available to wind energy operations for years; now, adoption is critical.
Why traditional approaches to wind farm operations are failing
Today’s wind operators face an unprecedented convergence of challenges. Fleets installed during the 2010-2015 boom are aging in unexpected ways, revealing design vulnerabilities no one anticipated. Meanwhile, the support infrastructure is crumbling; spare parts have become scarce, OEM support is limited, and insurance companies are tightening coverage just when operators need them most.
The situation is particularly acute following recent policy changes. The One Big Beautiful Bill in the United States has fundamentally altered the economic landscape. PTC farming is no longer viable; turbines must run longer and more reliably than ever before. Engineering teams, already stretched thin, are being asked to manage not just wind assets but solar and battery storage as well. The old playbook simply doesn’t work anymore.
Consider the scope of just one challenge: polyester blade failures. During our podcast conversation with Edo Kuipers of We4Ce, we learned that an estimated 30,000 to 40,000 blades worldwide are experiencing root bushing issues. ‘After a while, blades are simply flying off,’ Kuipers explained. The financial impact of a single blade failure can exceed €300,000 when you factor in replacement costs, lost production, and crane mobilization. Yet innovative repair solutions, like the one developed by We4Ce and CNC Onsite, can address the same problem for €40,000 if caught early. This pattern repeats across every major component. Gearbox failures that once required complete replacement can now be predicted months in advance. Lightning damage that previously caused catastrophic failures can be prevented with inexpensive upgrades and real-time monitoring. All these solutions are based on the principle that predicted maintenance is better than an expensive surprise.
Seeing problems before they happeny, and potential risks
The transformation begins with visibility. Modern monitoring systems reveal problems that traditional methods miss entirely. Eric van Genuchten of Sensing360 shared an eye-opening statistic on our podcast: ‘In planetary gearbox failures, they get 90%, so there’s still 10% of failures they cannot detect.’ That missing 10% represents the catastrophic failures that destroy budgets and production targets. Advanced monitoring technologies are filling these gaps. Sensing360’s fiber optic sensors, for example, detect minute deformations in steel components, revealing load imbalances and fatigue progression invisible to traditional monitoring. ‘We integrate our sensors in steel and make rotating equipment smarter,’ van Genuchten explained.
Other companies are deploying acoustic systems to identify blade delamination, oil analysis for gearbox health, and electrical signature analysis for generator issues. Each technology adds a piece to the puzzle, but the real value comes from integration. The impact of load monitoring alone can be transformative.
As van Genuchten explained, ‘Twenty percent more loading on a gearbox or on a bearing is half of your life. The other way around, twenty percent less loading is double your life.’ With proper monitoring, operators can optimize load distribution across their fleet, extending component life while maximizing production.
But monitoring without action is just expensive data collection. The most successful operators are those who’ve learned to translate sensor data into operational decisions. This requires not just technology but organizational change, breaking down silos between monitoring, maintenance, and management teams.
In Wind Energy Operations, Early intervention makes the million-dollar difference
The economics of early intervention are compelling across every component type. The blade root bushing example from We4Ce illustrates this perfectly. With their solution, early detection means replacing just 24-30 bushings in about 24 hours of drilling work. Wait, and you’re looking at 60+ bushings and 60 hours of work. Early detection doesn’t just prevent catastrophic failure; it makes repairs faster, cheaper, and more reliable.
This principle extends throughout the turbine. Early-stage bearing damage can be addressed through targeted lubrication or minor adjustments. Incipient electrical issues can be resolved with cleaning or connection tightening. Small blade surface cracks can be repaired in a few hours before they propagate into structural damage requiring weeks of work.
Leading operators are implementing tiered response protocols based on monitoring data. Critical issues trigger immediate intervention. Developing problems are scheduled for the next maintenance window. Minor issues are monitored and addressed during routine service. This systematic approach reduces both emergency repairs and unnecessary maintenance, optimizing resource allocation across the fleet.
Turning information into action
While monitoring generates data, platforms like SkySpecs’ Horizon transform that data into operational intelligence. Josh Goryl, SkySpecs’ Chief Revenue Officer, explained their evolution at the recent Customer Forum: ‘I think where we can help our customers is getting all that data into one place.
The game-changer is integration across data types. The company is working to combine performance data with CMS data to provide valuable insights into turbine health. This approach has been informed by operators across the world, who’ve discovered that integrated platforms deliver insights that siloed data can’t.
The platform approach also addresses the reality of shrinking engineering teams managing expanding portfolios. As Goryl noted, many wind engineers are now responsible for solar and battery storage assets as well. One platform managing multiple technologies through a unified interface becomes essential for operational efficiency.
The Integration Imperative for Wind Farm Operations
The most successful operators aren’t just adopting individual technologies; they’re integrating monitoring, inspection, and repair into a seamless operational system. This integration operates at multiple levels.
At the technical level, data from various monitoring systems feeds into unified platforms that provide comprehensive asset visibility. These platforms don’t just display data; they analyze patterns, predict failures, and generate work orders.
At the organizational level, integration means breaking down barriers between departments. This cross-functional collaboration transforms O&M from a cost center into a value driver. Building your improvement roadmap For operators ready to enhance their O&M approach, the path forward involves several key steps:
Assessing the Current State of your Wind Energy Operations
Document your maintenance costs, failure rates, and downtime patterns. Identify which problems consume the most resources and which assets are most critical to your wind farm operations.
Start with targeted pilots Rather than attempting wholesale transformation, begin with focused initiatives targeting your biggest pain points. Whether it’s blade monitoring, gearbox sensors, or repair innovations, starting with your largest issue will help you see the biggest benefit.
• Invest in integration, not just technology: the most sophisticated monitoring system is worthless if its data isn’t acted upon. Ensure your organization has the processes and culture to transform data into decisions – this is the first step to profitability in your wind farm operations.
Build partnerships, not just contracts: look for technology providers and service companies willing to share knowledge, not just deliver services. The goal is building capability, not dependency.
• Measure and iterate: track the impact of each initiative on your key performance indicators. Use lessons learned to refine your approach and guide future investments.
The competitive advantage
The wind industry has reached an inflection point. With increasingly large and complex turbines, monitoring needs to adapt with it. The era of flying blind is over.
In an industry where margins continue to compress and competition intensifies, operational excellence has become a key differentiator. Those who master the integration of monitoring, inspection, and repair will thrive. Those who cling to reactive maintenance face escalating costs and declining competitiveness.
The technology exists. The business case is proven. The early adopters are already reaping the benefits. The question isn’t whether to transform your O&M approach, but how quickly you can adapt to this new reality. In the race to operational excellence, the winners will be those who act decisively to embrace the efficiency revolution reshaping wind operations.
Unless otherwise noted, images here are from We4C Rotorblade Specialist.

Contact us for help understanding your lightning damage, future risks, and how to get more uptime from your equipment.
Download the full article from PES Wind here
Find a practical guide to solving lightning problems and filing better insurance claims here
Wind Industry Operations: In Wind’s Next Chapter, Operations take center stage
Renewable Energy
BladeBUG Tackles Serial Blade Defects with Robotics
Weather Guard Lightning Tech

BladeBUG Tackles Serial Blade Defects with Robotics
Chris Cieslak, CEO of BladeBug, joins the show to discuss how their walking robot is making ultrasonic blade inspections faster and more accessible. They cover new horizontal scanning capabilities for lay down yards, blade root inspections for bushing defects, and plans to expand into North America in 2026.
Sign up now for Uptime Tech News, our weekly newsletter on all things wind technology. This episode is sponsored by Weather Guard Lightning Tech. Learn more about Weather Guard’s StrikeTape Wind Turbine LPS retrofit. Follow the show on YouTube, Linkedin and visit Weather Guard on the web. And subscribe to Rosemary’s “Engineering with Rosie” YouTube channel here. Have a question we can answer on the show? Email us!
Welcome to Uptime Spotlight, shining Light on Wind. Energy’s brightest innovators. This is the Progress Powering Tomorrow.
Allen Hall: Chris, welcome back to the show.
Chris Cieslak: It’s great to be back. Thank you very much for having me on again.
Allen Hall: It’s great to see you in person, and a lot has been happening at Blade Bugs since the last time I saw Blade Bug in person. Yeah, the robot. It looks a lot different and it has really new capabilities.
Chris Cieslak: So we’ve continued to develop our ultrasonic, non-destructive testing capabilities of the blade bug robot.
Um, but what we’ve now added to its capabilities is to do horizontal blade scans as well. So we’re able to do blades that are in lay down yards or blades that have come down for inspections as well as up tower. So we can do up tower, down tower inspections. We’re trying to capture. I guess the opportunity to inspect blades after transportation when they get delivered to site, to look [00:01:00] for any transport damage or anything that might have been missed in the factory inspections.
And then we can do subsequent installation inspections as well to make sure there’s no mishandling damage on those blades. So yeah, we’ve been just refining what we can do with the NDT side of things and improving its capabilities
Joel Saxum: was that need driven from like market response and people say, Hey, we need, we need.
We like the blade blood product. We like what you’re doing, but we need it here. Or do you guys just say like, Hey, this is the next, this is the next thing we can do. Why not?
Chris Cieslak: It was very much market response. We had a lot of inquiries this year from, um, OEMs, blade manufacturers across the board with issues within their blades that need to be inspected on the ground, up the tap, any which way they can.
There there was no, um, rhyme or reason, which was better, but the fact that he wanted to improve the ability of it horizontally has led the. Sort of modifications that you’ve seen and now we’re doing like down tower, right? Blade scans. Yeah. A really fast breed. So
Joel Saxum: I think the, the important thing there is too is that because of the way the robot is built [00:02:00] now, when you see NDT in a factory, it’s this robot rolls along this perfectly flat concrete floor and it does this and it does that.
But the way the robot is built, if a blade is sitting in a chair trailing edge up, or if it’s flap wise, any which way the robot can adapt to, right? And the idea is. We, we looked at it today and kind of the new cage and the new things you have around it with all the different encoders and for the heads and everything is you can collect data however is needed.
If it’s rasterized, if there’s a vector, if there’s a line, if we go down a bond line, if we need to scan a two foot wide path down the middle of the top of the spa cap, we can do all those different things and all kinds of orientations. That’s a fantastic capability.
Chris Cieslak: Yeah, absolutely. And it, that’s again for the market needs.
So we are able to scan maybe a meter wide in one sort of cord wise. Pass of that probe whilst walking in the span-wise direction. So we’re able to do that raster scan at various spacing. So if you’ve got a defect that you wanna find that maximum 20 mil, we’ll just have a 20 mil step [00:03:00] size between each scan.
If you’ve got a bigger tolerance, we can have 50 mil, a hundred mil it, it’s so tuneable and it removes any of the variability that you get from a human to human operator doing that scanning. And this is all about. Repeatable, consistent high quality data that you can then use to make real informed decisions about the state of those blades and act upon it.
So this is not about, um, an alternative to humans. It’s just a better, it’s just an evolution of how humans do it. We can just do it really quick and it’s probably, we, we say it’s like six times faster than a human, but actually we’re 10 times faster. We don’t need to do any of the mapping out of the blade, but it’s all encoded all that data.
We know where the robot is as we walk. That’s all captured. And then you end up with really. Consistent data. It doesn’t matter who’s operating a robot, the robot will have those settings preset and you just walk down the blade, get that data, and then our subject matter experts, they’re offline, you know, they are in their offices, warm, cozy offices, reviewing data from multiple sources of robots.
And it’s about, you know, improving that [00:04:00] efficiency of getting that report out to the customer and letting ’em know what’s wrong with their blades, actually,
Allen Hall: because that’s always been the drawback of, with NDT. Is that I think the engineers have always wanted to go do it. There’s been crush core transportation damage, which is sometimes hard to see.
You can maybe see a little bit of a wobble on the blade service, but you’re not sure what’s underneath. Bond line’s always an issue for engineering, but the cost to take a person, fly them out to look at a spot on a blade is really expensive, especially someone who is qualified. Yeah, so the, the difference now with play bug is you can have the technology to do the scan.
Much faster and do a lot of blades, which is what the de market demand is right now to do a lot of blades simultaneously and get the same level of data by the review, by the same expert just sitting somewhere else.
Chris Cieslak: Absolutely.
Joel Saxum: I think that the quality of data is a, it’s something to touch on here because when you send someone out to the field, it’s like if, if, if I go, if I go to the wall here and you go to the wall here and we both take a paintbrush, we paint a little bit [00:05:00] different, you’re probably gonna be better.
You’re gonna be able to reach higher spots than I can.
Allen Hall: This is true.
Joel Saxum: That’s true. It’s the same thing with like an NDT process. Now you’re taking the variability of the technician out of it as well. So the data quality collection at the source, that’s what played bug ducts.
Allen Hall: Yeah,
Joel Saxum: that’s the robotic processes.
That is making sure that if I scan this, whatever it may be, LM 48.7 and I do another one and another one and another one, I’m gonna get a consistent set of quality data and then it’s goes to analysis. We can make real decisions off.
Allen Hall: Well, I, I think in today’s world now, especially with transportation damage and warranties, that they’re trying to pick up a lot of things at two years in that they could have picked up free installation.
Yeah. Or lifting of the blades. That world is changing very rapidly. I think a lot of operators are getting smarter about this, but they haven’t thought about where do we go find the tool.
Speaker: Yeah.
Allen Hall: And, and I know Joel knows that, Hey, it, it’s Chris at Blade Bug. You need to call him and get to the technology.
But I think for a lot of [00:06:00] operators around the world, they haven’t thought about the cost They’re paying the warranty costs, they’re paying the insurance costs they’re paying because they don’t have the set of data. And it’s not tremendously expensive to go do. But now the capability is here. What is the market saying?
Is it, is it coming back to you now and saying, okay, let’s go. We gotta, we gotta mobilize. We need 10 of these blade bugs out here to go, go take a scan. Where, where, where are we at today?
Chris Cieslak: We’ve hads. Validation this year that this is needed. And it’s a case of we just need to be around for when they come back round for that because the, the issues that we’re looking for, you know, it solves the problem of these new big 80 a hundred meter plus blades that have issues, which shouldn’t.
Frankly exist like process manufacturer issues, but they are there. They need to be investigated. If you’re an asset only, you wanna know that. Do I have a blade that’s likely to fail compared to one which is, which is okay? And sort of focus on that and not essentially remove any uncertainty or worry that you have about your assets.
’cause you can see other [00:07:00] turbine blades falling. Um, so we are trying to solve that problem. But at the same time, end of warranty claims, if you’re gonna be taken over these blades and doing the maintenance yourself, you wanna know that what you are being given. It hasn’t gotten any nasties lurking inside that’s gonna bite you.
Joel Saxum: Yeah.
Chris Cieslak: Very expensively in a few years down the line. And so you wanna be able to, you know, tick a box, go, actually these are fine. Well actually these are problems. I, you need to give me some money so I can perform remedial work on these blades. And then you end of life, you know, how hard have they lived?
Can you do an assessment to go, actually you can sweat these assets for longer. So we, we kind of see ourselves being, you know, useful right now for the new blades, but actually throughout the value chain of a life of a blade. People need to start seeing that NDT ultrasonic being one of them. We are working on other forms of NDT as well, but there are ways of using it to just really remove a lot of uncertainty and potential risk for that.
You’re gonna end up paying through the, you know, through the, the roof wall because you’ve underestimated something or you’ve missed something, which you could have captured with a, with a quick inspection.
Joel Saxum: To [00:08:00] me, NDT has been floating around there, but it just hasn’t been as accessible or easy. The knowledge hasn’t been there about it, but the what it can do for an operator.
In de-risking their fleet is amazing. They just need to understand it and know it. But you guys with the robotic technology to me, are bringing NDT to the masses
Chris Cieslak: Yeah.
Joel Saxum: In a way that hasn’t been able to be done, done before
Chris Cieslak: that. And that that’s, we, we are trying to really just be able to roll it out at a way that you’re not limited to those limited experts in the composite NDT world.
So we wanna work with them, with the C-N-C-C-I-C NDTs of this world because they are the expertise in composite. So being able to interpret those, those scams. Is not a quick thing to become proficient at. So we are like, okay, let’s work with these people, but let’s give them the best quality data, consistent data that we possibly can and let’s remove those barriers of those limited people so we can roll it out to the masses.
Yeah, and we are that sort of next level of information where it isn’t just seen as like a nice to have, it’s like an essential to have, but just how [00:09:00] we see it now. It’s not NDT is no longer like, it’s the last thing that we would look at. It should be just part of the drones. It should inspection, be part of the internal crawlers regimes.
Yeah, it’s just part of it. ’cause there isn’t one type of inspection that ticks all the boxes. There isn’t silver bullet of NDT. And so it’s just making sure that you use the right system for the right inspection type. And so it’s complementary to drones, it’s complimentary to the internal drones, uh, crawlers.
It’s just the next level to give you certainty. Remove any, you know, if you see something indicated on a a on a photograph. That doesn’t tell you the true picture of what’s going on with the structure. So this is really about, okay, I’ve got an indication of something there. Let’s find out what that really is.
And then with that information you can go, right, I know a repair schedule is gonna take this long. The downtime of that turbine’s gonna be this long and you can plan it in. ’cause everyone’s already got limited budgets, which I think why NDT hasn’t taken off as it should have done because nobody’s got money for more inspections.
Right. Even though there is a money saving to be had long term, everyone is fighting [00:10:00] fires and you know, they’ve really got a limited inspection budget. Drone prices or drone inspections have come down. It’s sort, sort of rise to the bottom. But with that next value add to really add certainty to what you’re trying to inspect without, you know, you go to do a day repair and it ends up being three months or something like, well
Allen Hall: that’s the lightning,
Joel Saxum: right?
Allen Hall: Yeah. Lightning is the, the one case where every time you start to scarf. The exterior of the blade, you’re not sure how deep that’s going and how expensive it is. Yeah, and it always amazes me when we talk to a customer and they’re started like, well, you know, it’s gonna be a foot wide scarf, and now we’re into 10 meters and now we’re on the inside.
Yeah. And the outside. Why did you not do an NDT? It seems like money well spent Yeah. To do, especially if you have a, a quantity of them. And I think the quantity is a key now because in the US there’s 75,000 turbines worldwide, several hundred thousand turbines. The number of turbines is there. The number of problems is there.
It makes more financial sense today than ever because drone [00:11:00]information has come down on cost. And the internal rovers though expensive has also come down on cost. NDT has also come down where it’s now available to the masses. Yeah. But it has been such a mental barrier. That barrier has to go away. If we’re going going to keep blades in operation for 25, 30 years, I
Joel Saxum: mean, we’re seeing no
Allen Hall: way you can do it
Joel Saxum: otherwise.
We’re seeing serial defects. But the only way that you can inspect and or control them is with NDT now.
Allen Hall: Sure.
Joel Saxum: And if we would’ve been on this years ago, we wouldn’t have so many, what is our term? Blade liberations liberating
Chris Cieslak: blades.
Joel Saxum: Right, right.
Allen Hall: What about blade route? Can the robot get around the blade route and see for the bushings and the insert issues?
Chris Cieslak: Yeah, so the robot can, we can walk circumferentially around that blade route and we can look for issues which are affecting thousands of blades. Especially in North America. Yeah.
Allen Hall: Oh yeah.
Chris Cieslak: So that is an area that is. You know, we are lucky that we’ve got, um, a warehouse full of blade samples or route down to tip, and we were able to sort of calibrate, verify, prove everything in our facility to [00:12:00] then take out to the field because that is just, you know, NDT of bushings is great, whether it’s ultrasonic or whether we’re using like CMS, uh, type systems as well.
But we can really just say, okay, this is the area where the problem is. This needs to be resolved. And then, you know, we go to some of the companies that can resolve those issues with it. And this is really about played by being part of a group of technologies working together to give overall solutions
Allen Hall: because the robot’s not that big.
It could be taken up tower relatively easily, put on the root of the blade, told to walk around it. You gotta scan now, you know. It’s a lot easier than trying to put a technician on ropes out there for sure.
Chris Cieslak: Yeah.
Allen Hall: And the speed up it.
Joel Saxum: So let’s talk about execution then for a second. When that goes to the field from you, someone says, Chris needs some help, what does it look like?
How does it work?
Chris Cieslak: Once we get a call out, um, we’ll do a site assessment. We’ve got all our rams, everything in place. You know, we’ve been on turbines. We know the process of getting out there. We’re all GWO qualified and go to site and do their work. Um, for us, we can [00:13:00] turn up on site, unload the van, the robot is on a blade in less than an hour.
Ready to inspect? Yep. Typically half an hour. You know, if we’ve been on that same turbine a number of times, it’s somewhere just like clockwork. You know, muscle memory comes in, you’ve got all those processes down, um, and then it’s just scanning. Our robot operator just presses a button and we just watch it perform scans.
And as I said, you know, we are not necessarily the NDT experts. We obviously are very mindful of NDT and know what scans look like. But if there’s any issues, we have a styling, we dial in remote to our supplement expert, they can actually remotely take control, change the settings, parameters.
Allen Hall: Wow.
Chris Cieslak: And so they’re virtually present and that’s one of the beauties, you know, you don’t need to have people on site.
You can have our general, um, robot techs to do the work, but you still have that comfort of knowing that the data is being overlooked if need be by those experts.
Joel Saxum: The next level, um, commercial evolution would be being able to lease the kit to someone and or have ISPs do it for [00:14:00] you guys kinda globally, or what is the thought
Chris Cieslak: there?
Absolutely. So. Yeah, so we to, to really roll this out, we just wanna have people operate in the robots as if it’s like a drone. So drone inspection companies are a classic company that we see perfectly aligned with. You’ve got the sky specs of this world, you know, you’ve got drone operator, they do a scan, they can find something, put the robot up there and get that next level of information always straight away and feed that into their systems to give that insight into that customer.
Um, you know, be it an OEM who’s got a small service team, they can all be trained up. You’ve got general turbine technicians. They’ve all got G We working at height. That’s all you need to operate the bay by road, but you don’t need to have the RAA level qualified people, which are in short supply anyway.
Let them do the jobs that we are not gonna solve. They can do the big repairs we are taking away, you know, another problem for them, but giving them insights that make their job easier and more successful by removing any of those surprises when they’re gonna do that work.
Allen Hall: So what’s the plans for 2026 then?
Chris Cieslak: 2026 for us is to pick up where 2025 should have ended. [00:15:00] So we were, we were meant to be in the States. Yeah. On some projects that got postponed until 26. So it’s really, for us North America is, um, what we’re really, as you said, there’s seven, 5,000 turbines there, but there’s also a lot of, um, turbines with known issues that we can help determine which blades are affected.
And that involves blades on the ground, that involves blades, uh, that are flying. So. For us, we wanna get out to the states as soon as possible, so we’re working with some of the OEMs and, and essentially some of the asset owners.
Allen Hall: Chris, it’s so great to meet you in person and talk about the latest that’s happening.
Thank you. With Blade Bug, if people need to get ahold of you or Blade Bug, how do they do that?
Chris Cieslak: I, I would say LinkedIn is probably the best place to find myself and also Blade Bug and contact us, um, through that.
Allen Hall: Alright, great. Thanks Chris for joining us and we will see you at the next. So hopefully in America, come to America sometime.
We’d love to see you there.
Chris Cieslak: Thank you very [00:16:00] much.
Renewable Energy
Understanding the U.S. Constitution
Hillsdale College is a rightwing Christian extremist organization that ostensibly honors the United States Constitution.
Here’s their quiz, which should be called the “Constitutional Trivia Quiz.”, whose purpose is obviously to convince Americans of their ignorance.
When I teach, I’m going for understanding of the topic, not the memorization of useless information.
-
Greenhouse Gases7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Spanish-language misinformation on renewable energy spreads online, report shows
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits

