Connect with us

Published

on

A month ago, ahead of the mid-year UN climate talks, the Brazilian COP30 Presidency warned governments against “introducing potentially contentious new agenda items that could further burden the process or detract from agreed priorities”.

But two such items – submitted by Bolivia on behalf of the Like-Minded Group of Developing Countries (LMDC) which includes China and Saudi Arabia – have proved highly contentious and prevented the negotiations in Bonn from beginning as planned today.

Two weeks ago, Bolivia proposed an agenda item on implementation of the part of the Paris Agreement (Article 9.1) which states that developed countries “shall provide financial resources to assist developing country Parties”.

A senior negotiator from one LMDC country told Climate Home today that the discussion on proper implementation of this article is definitely not on the current agenda in Bonn and should be included.

On the same day, Bolivia proposed another item on “promoting international cooperation and addressing the concerns with climate change-related trade-restrictive unilateral measures”.

This targets the EU’s tax on the carbon emissions of certain imported products and similar proposed measures from the UK and Canada, arguing that they have been introduced “under the guise of climate objectives” and “increase the cost of worldwide climate action”.

Similar attempts were made to get this issue onto the agendas of COP28 and COP29 but both attempts were unsuccessful due to opposition from the developed countries whose policies are criticised by the proposal.

With the two sides at loggerheads, the Bonn opening plenary – which was scheduled to start at 10am local time has yet to begin. “Whole day almost wasted,” said one developing country negotiator, adding “the developed parties don’t want to see our issues”.

Brazil seeks early deals on two stalled issues at Bonn climate talks

While waiting for the plenary to start, some representatives from civil society recalled that most developing countries left COP29 in Baku really disappointed with the new climate finance goal – the famous NCQG – agreed there. Today in Bonn, finance is – yet again – the reason for tense discussions between countries.

Ironically, the agenda row is actually holding up much-needed discussions on finance. Today, the COP30 Presidency was supposed to be listening to governments’ views on the Baku-Belém roadmap on how to expand developed countries’ COP29 promise of $300 billion a year in climate finance to the $1.3 trillion developing countries want by bringing in other sources. That meeting has been suspended until further notice.

At 6pm in Bonn, a delegate told Climate Home: “There is still no resolution on these two items of the agenda”. Shortly afterwards, in the corridors, we asked UN climate chief Simon Stiell if the official opening was likely to happen in Monday, to which he replied: “So much work still in progress.”

The room where the plenary will be held is available only until 10pm German time. So time is running out in more ways than one!

The venue for the annual Bonn climate talks (Photo: 10 Billion Solutions)

Climate-unfriendly US absent from Bonn

After starting the process of withdrawing the United States from the Paris Agreement in January, Donald Trump’s administration decided for the first time not to send a delegation to the preparatory meetings for COP30, which got off to a slow start today in Bonn.

“It’s no surprise that the US isn’t represented here,” Alden Meyer, senior associate at E3G, told Climate Home. “They have dismantled the office in the State Department that was responsible for coordinating US strategy in the negotiations. So it’s not even clear who they would have sent if they decided to send someone.”

The country will technically be out of the Paris Agreement as of January 27, 2026. “They are also still part of the [UN Climate] Convention. So, they could go to Belém and try to change the negotiations dynamics if they decide it’s in their interest to do so,” Meyer added.

The US-based We Are Still In coalition is, however, participating in the Bonn session, the veteran negotiations expert confirmed. This initiative of subnational states, cities and businesses has been trying to fulfill America’s climate commitments since the gap left by Trump’s first term.

Argentina’s one-woman team

As of last Friday, there was no official information or response to Climate Home’s questions regarding whether Argentina would participate in the meetings in Bonn.

Last November, Javier Milei’s government surprised everyone in Baku by deciding to withdraw the Argentine delegation from COP29.

Although Argentina has repeatedly stated it’s considering pulling out of the Paris Agreement, the South American country hasn’t yet decided to do so, possibly because a potential withdrawal would likely harm ties with its main trading partners – Brazil, China, and the European Union.

Comment: ‘Hectic’ in high heels? Women still face gender hurdles at UN climate talks

As we were able to verify, Milei’s government has sent just one delegate to Bonn: the current director of environmental affairs at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Eliana Saissac.

It’s notoriously difficult for countries with small delegations to engage in a packed talks agenda with several simultaneous meetings – so it’s unclear how Argentina plans to negotiate meaningfully with just one representative or where her efforts will be focused.

The post Bonn Bulletin: Climate talks delayed by agenda fight appeared first on Climate Home News.

Bonn Bulletin: Climate talks delayed by agenda fight

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Earth’s Greatest Underwater Migrations Are Disappearing

Published

on

From the Amazon to the Mekong, migratory freshwater fish underpin food security for millions, but over 300 species need urgent conservation intervention, warns a new UN report.

Beneath the surface of the planet’s rivers and lakes, the historically heaving migrations of freshwater fish are thinning out. The blubbery-lipped Siamese giant carp of Asia’s Mekong River, the mottled brown goonch of India’s Ganges and the ancient-in-appearance beluga sturgeon of Europe’s Danube River are declining.

Earth’s Greatest Underwater Migrations Are Disappearing

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Border Communities Remain in the Dark About Federal Government’s Billion-Dollar Buoy Project

Published

on

The industrial-grade buoys, already being installed in Brownsville, Texas, are meant to prevent unauthorized crossings. But experts warn the buoys could intensify flooding and change the river’s course.

Reporting supported by the Water Desk at the University of Colorado, Boulder.

Border Communities Remain in the Dark About Federal Government’s Billion-Dollar Buoy Project

Continue Reading

Climate Change

How can we make the energy transition fair and sustainable?

Published

on

The extraction of minerals needed for the clean energy transition is projected to expand globally in coming years, presenting multiple risks to ecosystems and Indigenous Peoples, necessitating strong global guidelines.

But what are these minerals, what role do they play in our efforts to combat climate change, and how can we source and use them in an environmentally sustainable way? Let’s take a look!

So, what are these key minerals?

Renewable energy and electric vehicle (EV) technologies will play an important role in combating climate change. These technologies rely on key raw materials, such as lithium, cobalt, nickel, copper, manganese, graphite and rare earth elements.

These materials are often referred to as ‘critical minerals’ due to their perceived significance for national interests or ‘transition minerals’ due to their importance in the clean energy transition.

Where are they found?

While these minerals are found globally, some countries have greater reserves than others, based on geology and the economic feasibility of their extraction. The countries listed below have the highest reserves, listed from first to third.

  • Lithium: Chile, Australia, Argentina
  • Cobalt: Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Australia, Indonesia
  • Nickel: Indonesia, Australia, Brazil
  • Copper: Chile, Peru, Australia

How is mining these minerals a risk to people and the environment?

There are multiple impacts from mining minerals that are considered critical. Here are a few of them:

A banner rejecting nickel mining on Manyaifun Island, West Waigeo District, Raja Ampat Regency, Southwest Papua Province, Indonesia. © Nita / Greenpeace

So what can we do?

Some studies projecting massive increases to the demand for transition minerals in coming years are used to justify more mining. However, embracing less mineral-intensive solutions can reduce the need for mining, while still ensuring renewable energy growth.

We need to pressure governments and industries to adopt policies, practices and solutions that reduce demand while also minimising mining’s impacts.

These changes require ambition to go beyond climate action, focusing investment toward less mineral-intensive solutions like EV public transportation, advancing technology to use fewer minerals more efficiently, and expanding reuse and recycling.

What are the solutions to reduce the need for mining?

Given the problems associated with the extraction and use of transition minerals, it is important to remember four key solutions that will help limit the need for mining. They are:

  • Sufficiency – prioritise a decent living standard for all while reducing the total energy and material needed across the economy,
  • Efficiency – investments to help technologies do the same or better with less materials
  • Substitution – remove or reduce the need for certain minerals in products by using different types of technology or energy solutions, 
  • Recycling – can significantly reduce environmental and social impacts compared to mining, and therefore should be maximised.  
Dominga Port Mining Project Cancelled in Santiago. © Greenpeace / Cristobal Olivares
The Dominga port mining project, valued at US$2.5 billion, intended to be installed in the set of eight islands that make up the Humboldt Archipelago, however, due to social and community pressure, the project was stopped. © Greenpeace / Cristobal Olivares

Five guiding principles on minerals for energy transition

Greenpeace has developed five key principles essential for ensuring a just and equitable energy transition that can be adapted into local contexts.

  1. The 1.5°C Guiding Star: We must achieve the Paris Agreement goal of limiting global warming to no more than 1.5°C. Any use of minerals must be prioritised for a fast and green energy transition above non-essential uses, such as for military purposes.
  2. Just and Equitable Solutions: Justice and equity for people and the environment must be embedded in every aspect of using and sourcing materials from reducing mineral demand, to recycling and mining.
  3. Reduce Demand: Slowing mineral demand by adopting the concepts of sufficiency (ie. reducing the need for resources) and efficiency (ie. enhancing the effectiveness of resource use).
  4. Prioritise ‘Above Ground’ Materials: Recycling can significantly reduce environmental and social impacts compared to mining. Potential sources include spent batteries, production waste, household e-waste and industrial scrap piles.
  5. Protect Sensitive Areas and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities: While there are many initiatives pushing for improved mining practices, the industry continues to pose serious risks to people and the environment. Three requirements are proposed:
    • 5.1 Protect ‘No-Go’ zones, areas where mining should not occur
    • 5.2 Respect the rights of Indigenous Peoples and local communities 
    • 5.3 Companies must act responsibly, preventing and mitigating environmental damage and impacts, and respecting human rights.

Irène Wabiwa is a Biodiversity Programme Manager at Greenpeace International

How can we make the energy transition fair and sustainable?

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com