The substantial carbon footprint associated with the Super Bowl, one of the most-watched sporting events in the U.S., is not primarily linked to travel or the show’s energy use. Interestingly, it’s largely attributed to the significant environmental impact of the Super Bowl advertising frenzy.
The ads, which last in online promotions before and after the event, raise concerns among environmentally conscious consumers and investors. Unsurprisingly, climate experts emphasize the need to address the massive environmental impact of America’s most-loved and most-viewed sporting event.
Big-Time Sporting Events and Their Giant Environmental Impact
The sport of football or soccer is highly entertaining. But what most fans or spectators don’t know is that the global football industry is responsible for emitting over 30 million tons of carbon dioxide annually. That’s almost equal to Denmark’s annual emissions.
Millions of Americans regularly tune into football games, especially major events like the upcoming Super Bowl LVIII, with last year’s viewership exceeding 99 million. The immense audience underscores the need for organizations to assess the environmental impact of these sporting events.
Major sports leagues, like the NFL and NBA, can have a big influence over viewers. They can play a crucial role in promoting sustainability.
Large-scale sporting events often involve unforeseen environmental consequences. The construction of new infrastructure, sanitation upgrades, increased energy demands, and waste management challenges contribute to the overall impact on the environment.
Watch parties hosted by viewers further add up to waste generation and travel emissions on a national level.
According to an estimate, major sports leagues, including the NFL, NBA, NHL, and MLB, generate about 35,000 tons of CO2 annually, which covers fans’ emissions only. Think about the waste by the teams playing during the events.
More notably, A-listers and celebrity fans of the big game also contribute significantly to its CO2 footprint by flying through their private jets. Popstar Taylor Swift is one great example, who has been the subject of intense scrutiny for her sky-high flight emissions.
Additionally, the energy consumption to power stadiums, resource-intensive field maintenance, and the sale of food, beverage, and merchandise at games contribute significantly to the environmental impact of beloved sporting events in the United States.
And that even doesn’t include the biggest source of the Super Bowl’s carbon footprint – buzzy digital advertisements.
Super Bowl Ads Carbon Footprint
When advertisers calculate the expense of Super Bowl advertising, the immediate focus is often on the $7 million fee for a 30-second slot. However, what might be significantly overlooked is the environmental cost of the ads.
Super Bowl Average Ad Cost, 2002-2021 (in million USD)

In 2021, Super Bowl advertising produced as much carbon dioxide as 100,000 Americans or around 2 million tonnes of CO2. This calculation is based on data from iSpot.tv, indicating that 56 advertisers and their 67 spots resulted in over 6.3 billion TV ad impressions, 26 million online views, and 64 billion social impressions.
Some sources further noted that in the lead-up to the Super Bowl, there were a total of about 4 billion digital ad impressions. To put that in perspective, 1 million ad impressions is equal to 1 metric ton of CO2 or its equivalent. Using that data, the 4 billion ad impressions generated 4,000 metric tons of CO2e.

In 2022, the top 15 ads alone generated nearly 470 million views, illustrating the substantial long-tail effect. Last year, the Super Bowl event garnered over 115 million viewers, recording over 3 million increase compared to the previous year.
With all that said, the Super Bowl has been doing its best to make the sporting event “green” and sustainable.
NFL Leading the Way to Sustainability
In 2022, the NFL, the Los Angeles Super Bowl LVI Host Committee, and Verizon collaborated on greening efforts for Super Bowl LVI. They aimed to enhance air quality, establish community gardens, bolster food security, and restore a California kelp forest.
Last year, Super Bowl LVII, featuring the Eagles and Chiefs in Arizona, was one of the NFL’s most sustainable efforts yet. The football league has one of the greatest commitments to make the Super Bowl more sustainable.
The league created the program NFL Green to address the environmental impact of their major sporting events. The initiative leads community projects that restore ecosystems and habitats. These include activities such as tree planting, wildlife habitat restoration, and reforestation projects to plant thousands of trees.
In addition to ecosystem restoration, green energy plays a significant role in NFL Green’s efforts. Annually, the NFL procures Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) matching the total energy consumption at its events. This strategy enables the NFL to offset the energy usage and greenhouse gas emissions associated with its major sporting events.
- RELATED: First NFL Team to Buy Carbon Credits
The NFL, in partnership with Arizonans, aims to achieve 92% waste diversion at the 2023 Super Bowl. Waste management has been a key focus, including recycling, composting, and minimizing landfill disposal.
Super Bowl and the Role of Carbon Credits
Earlier this year, the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), the football governing body in Europe, established a climate fund to address the sport’s massive carbon footprint. The $7.6 million fund will address the UEFA EURO 2024 kicking off in Munich on June 14.
The American Super Bowl LVIII committees and the NFL Green implemented the “Green Initiative” at the Las Vegas Indian Center. The initiative aims to plant trees and create green spaces and seedling restoration projects. Highlighting the impact of these efforts, Susan Groh from NFL Green said:
“The Super Bowl is here and gone, but when we are able to implement these greening projects throughout the community, it leaves a lasting legacy and just an impact that lasts for years to come.”
Apart from implementing sustainable practices to reduce its substantial waste and greening projects, the Super Bowl stakeholders are also using carbon credits to offset a portion of their emissions. For instance, Entergy and the Super Bowl XLVII Host Committee purchased carbon offsets to address flight emissions.
The credits are from various offset projects including a landfill gas collection in Texas, a forest conservation initiative in California, and an effort to capture methane from livestock manure in Michigan. The offsets have been certified to deliver the promised carbon reductions by the Climate Action Reserve. NFL is also doing the same when Houston Texans bought carbon credits to offset their air travel emissions.
Each credit bought represents a tonne of carbon emission reduction from specific offset projects, which can be nature-based or technological.
While the Super Bowl shines with sportsmanship and spectacle, its environmental toll is a wake-up call. From celeb jets to advertisement carbon emissions, sustainability is key. NFL’s strides show promise, but climate action must score big.
The post Beyond Touchdowns and Trophies: Unveiling the Carbon Footprint of Superbowl LVIII appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Clean Energy Investment Hits Record $2.3T in 2025 Says BloombergNEF: What Leads the Surge?
Global investment in clean energy reached a new high of $2.3 trillion in 2025, according to a major industry report. This total was 8% higher than in 2024, showing that investment in low-carbon technologies continued to grow despite economic uncertainty. Researchers say this shows the global interest in cutting greenhouse gas emissions and creating cleaner energy systems.
The figures come from the BloombergNEF Energy Transition Investment Trends 2026 report. BloombergNEF is a leading research provider that tracks investments in clean energy technologies and infrastructure.
The clean energy transition includes technologies such as renewable power, electric vehicles (EVs), grid improvements, energy storage, and climate-related tech companies. Together, these areas attracted record funding.
Breakdown of the $2.3 Trillion Investment
The global total of $2.3 trillion in 2025 covered several key clean energy sectors:
- Electric transport: The largest category, with $893 billion invested. This includes electric vehicles and charging infrastructure, which are expanding rapidly around the world.
- Renewable energy: About $690 billion went into renewable power such as wind, solar, and other clean sources. This was slightly lower than the previous year due to changing regulations in China’s power markets.
- Power grids: Investment in grid systems reached $483 billion in 2025. This spending supports the transmission and distribution of clean energy.
- Emerging sectors: Hydrogen received $7.3 billion, and nuclear energy received $36 billion.

Although total investment grew, renewable energy funding itself was down nearly 9.5% compared with 2024. This decline was mainly due to new regulatory rules in China, the world’s largest clean energy market.
Overall, clean energy spending has outpaced fossil fuel investment for a second year in a row. Fossil fuel supply investment fell by $9 billion in 2025, mainly due to reduced spending on oil and gas production and fossil power plants.

Regional Power Plays: Who’s Investing Where
Investment levels differ greatly by region. This shows the impact of policy, industry structure, and economic growth.
In the Asia Pacific, investment accounted for nearly 47% of the global total in 2025. China stayed the top market, investing around $800 billion in clean tech. This was despite some drops in its renewable sector.
India saw investment grow by 15%, reaching around $68 billion in 2025. The increase was driven by renewables, grid upgrades, and electrification projects.
The European Union grew its investment by 18% to about $455 billion, making it a major contributor to the global increase.
In the United States, investment increased by 3.5% to about $378 billion. This rise happened even though some federal policies slowed support for certain clean energy programs.

These patterns show that all regions invest in clean energy. However, the pace and focus vary based on local strategies and market conditions.
- SEE MORE: Renewables 2025: How China, the US, Europe, and India Are Leading the World’s Clean Energy Growth
Trends Driving Clean Energy Investment
-
Electrified Transport Leads
Investment in electric transport, like EVs and charging stations, is now a key player in clean energy spending. In 2025, this area alone attracted $893 billion, making it the top category of global investment.
Electric vehicles are growing fast as battery costs fall and more models become available. Many countries and companies have set targets to phase out fossil fuel vehicles, which boosts demand for EV infrastructure.

-
Renewable Power and Grids
Even though renewable investment dipped slightly, it still remained a large portion of the total. The $690 billion invested in renewables in 2025 supports new solar, wind, and other clean power plants.
Investment in power grids also grew, reaching $483 billion. Upgrading grids is essential to connect more clean energy to the places that need it. These upgrades include transmission lines, smart grid technologies, and energy storage systems.
-
Clean Tech Supply Chains and Finance
Investment in factories and supply chains for clean tech also expanded. In 2025, spending on clean energy supply chains reached $127 billion, a 6% increase from 2024. These funds went to battery factories, solar equipment production, and mining for battery metals.
Equity funding in climate-tech companies also rebounded strongly, rising to $77.3 billion — a 53% increase from the previous year. This was the first year of growth in equity funding after several years of decline.
In addition, energy transition debt issuance, loans, and bonds to finance clean energy projects reached $1.2 trillion, up 17% from 2024. This reflects strong interest from both public and private financiers.
Historical Context and Recent Growth
Clean energy investment has been growing steadily over the past decade.
In 2024, global energy transition investment reached about $2.1 trillion, surpassing the $2 trillion mark for the first time. This total was driven by electrified transport, renewable power, and grid investment.
In 2023, investment in clean energy surged to around $1.77 trillion, reflecting rising spending despite geopolitical challenges and market pressures. Electrified transport and renewables both hit new highs that year.
The jump to $2.3 trillion in 2025 continues this long-term growth trend, even though the rate of growth has slowed compared with earlier years. The annual increase dropped from more than 20% several years ago to 8% in 2025 as markets matured and conditions shifted.
Looking Ahead: The Road to $2.9 Trillion
Analysts expect clean energy investment to keep rising in the near term, though uncertainties remain.
BloombergNEF’s base-case scenario shows that global energy transition investment might hit about $2.9 trillion annually over the next five years. This will be above 2025 levels. It shows ongoing interest from both governments and companies.
The International Energy Agency (IEA) offers a broader forecast for total energy investment in 2025. Overall energy investment could reach around $3.3 trillion. This includes spending on both clean and fossil fuels. Clean technologies are expected to get over $2.2 trillion of that total. This would mean clean energy investment continues to outpace fossil fuel spending.

Experts see these future figures as good signs. However, they say annual investment must grow a lot to reach long-term climate goals, like those in the Paris Agreement. To meet net-zero by 2050, analysts say the world may need to invest over $5 trillion each year by the end of this decade.
What The Record Spend Means for the Energy Transition
The $2.3 trillion clean energy investment in 2025 shows that countries, companies, and investors around the world continue to fund the energy transition. These funds support low-carbon technologies that reduce emissions and improve energy security.
Investment in electric transport helps shift away from fossil fuel vehicles. Renewable energy funding builds new wind and solar capacity. Grid and storage investment enables that power to reach homes, businesses, and industries.
Regional investment patterns show strong gains in the Asia Pacific, Europe, India, and the United States. However, China saw a slight drop in renewable energy funding.
The clean energy transition remains robust, though overall growth rates have slowed compared with earlier years. The trend also shows that climate goals are now a key part of economic and infrastructure strategies. Forecasts indicate a continued expansion of clean energy investment soon. However, meeting long‑term climate targets will need even greater flows of capital across all regions.
The post Clean Energy Investment Hits Record $2.3T in 2025 Says BloombergNEF: What Leads the Surge? appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Microsoft Q2 FY26 Earnings: $81B Revenue, AI Momentum, and a 150% Jump in Water Use by 2030
Microsoft reported strong results for the second quarter of fiscal 2026, ending December 31, 2025. The company’s total revenue was $81.3 billion, up 17% from the $69.6 billion reported in the same period last year.
Net income, the profit after expenses, was $38.5 billion. This figure rose 60% from about $24.1 billion in the second quarter of fiscal 2025. Microsoft also reported a diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $5.16. This was up 60% from $3.23 per share in the prior year. Operating income also increased by 21% year over year to was $38.3 billion.
The tech giant also reported large growth in its cloud and AI-related businesses. Revenue from Microsoft Cloud reached $51.5 billion in the quarter. This was an increase of 26% compared with the prior year.
Breaking this down:
- Intelligent Cloud revenue was $32.9 billion, up 29%.
- Productivity and Business Processes revenue was $34.1 billion, up 16%.
- More Personal Computing revenue was $14.3 billion, down 3%.

The company also reported its remaining performance obligations, future contracted revenue yet to be recognized, at $625 billion. This was up 110% compared with the same time last year.
Microsoft continued to return cash to shareholders. In the quarter, it returned about $12.7 billion through dividends and share buybacks — an increase of about 32% year over year.
These results show that Microsoft continued to grow across major business segments in Q2 FY 2026. Cloud services and AI-related products remained key drivers of revenue growth. At the same time, personal computing revenue, which includes Windows licensing, Surface devices, and search advertising, experienced a small decline.
Despite these robust results, Microsoft’s stock fell about 11% after the earnings. It dropped by $52.95 to close around $428.68 in late trading after hitting a low of $421.11. This is due to investors’ concerns about slow cloud growth and high spending on AI.

Alongside its strong financial performance, Microsoft is also taking major strides in its environmental commitments.
Carbon Removal Leadership: Doubling Impact in 2025
Sustainability remains central to Microsoft’s strategy. In 2025, the company more than doubled its carbon removal agreements to 45 million metric tons of CO₂, up from 22 million tons in 2024.

These purchases include a mix of nature-based solutions. They cover forestry and soil carbon projects, plus direct air capture technologies. The agreements span North America, Europe, and Africa, targeting high-quality, verified removal credits with long-term permanence.
Microsoft’s move reflects a broader trend among tech giants committing to net-zero and carbon-negative strategies. Other big buyers are Amazon, Google, and Stripe. They’re investing in carbon removal to offset emissions that can’t be cut yet.
By securing long-term offtake agreements, Microsoft ensures these projects receive funding to scale operations and deliver measurable climate impact. Analysts predict that global corporate carbon removal purchases might exceed 150 million metric tons each year by 2030. This shows a fast-growing market that mixes corporate sustainability goals with investment chances.
AI’s Hidden Cost: Data Centers and Water Demand
Microsoft also released projections on AI-driven data center water consumption. With AI workloads surging, water use in Microsoft’s global data centers is expected to rise 150% by 2030 compared with current levels. That’s equal to using about 18 billion liters over the said period.
The increase is mainly due to liquid cooling systems used to maintain GPU and CPU performance in AI servers. Water is essential to prevent overheating and maintain efficiency. Microsoft’s water needs are spiking hardest in dry areas.
- In Phoenix (hit by 20 years of drought), the company cut its 2030 estimate from 3.3 billion liters to 2 billion by running hotter data centers.
- Near Jakarta, Indonesia (a sinking city with drained underground water), the forecast dropped from 1.9 billion to 664 million liters.
- In Pune, India (where shortages caused protests and a “No Water, No Vote” push), it fell from 1.9 billion to just 237 million liters—Microsoft wouldn’t say why.
As AI adoption grows, data centers will consume more energy and water, especially in regions with concentrated cloud infrastructure.

In an interview, Priscilla Johnson, Microsoft’s former director of water strategy until 2020, stated:
“Water took a back seat. Energy was more the focus because it was more expensive. Water was too cheap to be prioritized.”
Microsoft is now exploring solutions such as:
- Advanced cooling technologies to reduce water intensity per compute unit
- Use of recycled water in data centers where feasible
- AI-driven energy and resource optimization to manage electricity and water demand
The company emphasizes that AI deployment must be balanced with sustainability practices, ensuring growth does not lead to unsustainable water consumption or carbon emissions.
- MUST READ: AI Drives a Transformative Wave in Global Data Centers – and Energy Is the Real Bottleneck
Where Growth Meets Responsibility
Microsoft’s Q2 results show that growth and sustainability are connected. Investments in AI, cloud, and enterprise services boost revenue while increasing resource demand. The company’s carbon removal goals and energy-efficient data center plans help reduce environmental impacts.
Key metrics illustrate this balance:
- Revenue growth of 9% year-over-year
- Cloud revenue of $30.5 billion, up 12%
- Carbon removal agreements totaling 45 million metric tons
- Projected AI data center water increase of 150% by 2030
These initiatives demonstrate that Microsoft is trying to align profitability with long-term climate goals. Investing in clean technology, energy efficiency, and carbon removal shows that big companies can grow responsibly. This approach also helps reduce environmental impacts.
What Comes Next for AI, Climate, and Capital
Microsoft expects AI adoption to boost demand for:
- Data center capacity
- Cloud computing
- Specialized hardware like GPUs
Analysts predict the global AI data center market could double by 2030, creating both financial and sustainability challenges.
The carbon removal market is also expected to expand. With 45 million tons already contracted, Microsoft’s continued leadership signals corporate influence in scaling carbon removal projects.
Forecasts show that voluntary carbon removal deals might exceed $15 billion each year by 2030. This growth is mainly due to tech companies, industrial firms, and financial institutions.
Water management in data centers is another critical area. Companies need to invest in better cooling and recycled water solutions to help meet rising demand while protecting local water resources. Microsoft’s transparency around water use provides a model for responsible AI deployment globally.
Overall, Microsoft’s earnings report not only reflects strong financial performance but also highlights the company’s sustainability leadership. Growth, carbon removal, and AI infrastructure are linked. They provide insights for companies like Microsoft trying to balance profit with environmental responsibility.
- READ MORE on Microsoft’s carbon removal deals:
- Microsoft’s Mega Move: 18 Million Carbon Credit Deal with Rubicon Carbon
- Microsoft’s $800M Carbon Removal Deal Sets Record in Climate Fight
- Microsoft Buys 2 Million Tons of Carbon from Rubicon Carbon’s Uganda Forestry Project
- Peatland Carbon Credits: Microsoft Invests in Pantheon to Restore Peatlands for Durable Carbon Removal
- Big Tech Firms Microsoft (MSFT) and Alphabet (GOOGL) Lead in Durable Carbon Removal Investments Exceeding $10 Billion
The post Microsoft Q2 FY26 Earnings: $81B Revenue, AI Momentum, and a 150% Jump in Water Use by 2030 appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Royal Caribbean’s (RCL) Record 2025 Profits Meet Carbon Challenges of the Cruise Industry
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (NYSE: RCL) kicked off 2026 with strong financial results for 2025. The company’s success reflects a broader recovery and growth in the global cruise industry. Alongside financial gains, the industry faces growing scrutiny over environmental impact.
Cruise ships are highly carbon-intensive per passenger, prompting major lines—including Royal Caribbean, MSC, Carnival, and Norwegian Cruise Line—to invest in cleaner fuels, energy-efficient technologies, and shore power solutions.
This article looks at the cruise sector’s financial health, passenger growth, and environmental issues. It also discusses how companies are working to balance profits with sustainability.
Smooth Sailing: 2025 Profits and 2026 Outlook
Royal Caribbean Cruises had solid financial results in 2025 and a positive outlook for 2026. The company made nearly $18 billion in revenue in 2025, up from about $16.48 billion in 2024.
Net income also grew to about $4.27 billion, compared with roughly $2.88 billion the year before. Adjusted earnings per share (EPS) rose to $15.64, showing improved profitability.

The company also generated a strong operating cash flow of about $6.4–6.5 billion and returned around $2 billion to shareholders during the year. Record cruise bookings and higher ticket prices helped drive these results.
Royal Caribbean’s board expects double-digit revenue growth in 2026, along with higher capacity. Adjusted EPS is projected between $17.70 and $18.10. Around two-thirds of 2026 cruise capacity is already booked at strong pricing, supporting this forecast.
Jason Liberty, the company CEO, remarked:
“2025 was an outstanding year, and the momentum is further accelerating into 2026… and we continue to see strong and growing preference for our leading brands and differentiated vacation experiences. We expect another strong year of financial performance with both revenue and earnings growing double digits, and we remain on track to achieve our Perfecta goals by 2027.”
After the earnings call, the company’s stock climbed over 6%, mainly due to strong 2026 guidance.

These results show not only a recovery from pandemic lows but also sustained demand for cruises. Analysts expect this trend to continue as global travel and premium leisure spending grow.
Passenger Waves: Cruise Industry Expansion and Emissions
The global cruise industry is growing fast. Projections show over 38 million passengers by 2026, up from around 37.7 million in 2025. This growth follows strong momentum from 2024 and reflects overall travel trends.

Higher demand is encouraging cruise lines to add ships and expand routes. Royal Caribbean, for example, has ordered new Discovery Class vessels and is growing its river cruise segment with more ships planned through 2031. This shows long-term confidence in the market.
Carbon Wake: Cruise Emissions vs Other Travel
Cruising, however, has a higher environmental impact than many other types of travel. Cruise ships are among the most carbon-intensive forms of travel per passenger per distance traveled. This is because they need fuel not just to move but also to run cabins, restaurants, pools, and entertainment.
Even large, efficient cruise ships by Royal Caribbean emit around 250 grams of CO₂ per passenger-kilometer. That is higher than most long-haul flights or hotel stays. Onboard services and hotel-style energy use make cruises even more carbon-heavy.
For perspective:
- A five-night cruise of 1,200 miles produces about 1,100 pounds (≈500 kg) of CO₂ per passenger.
- A flight covering the same distance plus a hotel stay produces roughly 264 kg of CO₂ per person.
This means a cruise can generate about 2x the greenhouse gas emissions of an equivalent flight-and-hotel trip.
Trains and electric cars have much lower emissions per passenger. For example, traveling by national rail produces about 35 g CO₂ per kilometer, and international trains like Eurostar are even lower at 4.5 g CO₂ per kilometer.

Other comparison insights:
- Emissions per passenger-kilometer: Large cruise ships emit 0.43–0.65 kg CO₂, depending on occupancy and efficiency. Economy-class flights emit 0.15–0.20 kg, while high-speed rail is around 0.04 kg. Cruises can be 2–10x more carbon-intensive per passenger.
- Fuel and technology impact: Using LNG instead of heavy fuel oil reduces CO₂ by 20–25%, but methane slip and upstream emissions can reduce gains. Air lubrication and optimized routing can cut fuel use by 5–10% per voyage.
Ship engines burn huge amounts of fuel. Amenities like air conditioning, theaters, pools, and restaurants add to the energy demand. Cruises remain a luxurious experience, but travelers should know that they usually have a higher carbon footprint than flights, plus hotels or land-based travel. This shows that while cruises are luxurious and convenient, they have a much higher carbon footprint than most other ways of traveling.
Cruise ships also emit sulfur oxides (SOx), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and fine particles, which can harm air quality in port cities and marine ecosystems. Many passengers also fly to and from cruise ports, adding more carbon emissions that are often not included in cruise footprint estimates.
How Cruise Lines Are Addressing Environmental Impact
Cruise companies, including Royal Caribbean, are working to reduce their environmental impact. Many aim to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 or earlier.
Royal Caribbean’s Destination Net Zero strategy focuses on:
- Alternative fuels: LNG-powered ships, biofuels, and fuel cell technology.
- New ship technologies: Advanced hulls, air lubrication systems, and shore power connections.
- Operational efficiency: Optimized routes and engine improvements to reduce fuel use per passenger.

Other cruise lines are also taking action to tackle their environmental footprint:
MSC Cruises used efficiency tools and smart itinerary planning to cut 50,000 tonnes of CO₂ in 2024. They are testing hybrid propulsion and shore power at multiple ports. Carnival Corporation is expanding LNG and biofuel use while increasing shore-side electrical connections. They are also researching carbon capture for ships.
Likewise, Norwegian Cruise Line (NCL) is adding LNG-powered ships, battery-assisted propulsion, and energy-efficient onboard systems. NCL is also expanding shore power at ports.
Disney Cruise Line uses hybrid exhaust gas cleaning, advanced wastewater treatment, and fuel-efficient hulls while eliminating single-use plastics onboard. Meanwhile, Princess Cruises applies energy-saving tech, waste reduction, and wastewater treatment, while testing LNG as a fuel alternative.
Overall, the cruise industry faces pressure to reduce carbon intensity. Cleaner fuels, new technologies, and operational efficiency are becoming standard. Environmental responsibility is now a key part of long-term business strategy.
Forecast Horizon: Growth, Finance, and Green Goals
Royal Caribbean and the cruise industry are financially strong. High bookings, growing revenue, and positive forecasts show that demand for cruises is rising. Investments in new ships and offerings aim to meet demand across different traveler groups.
Cruise forecasts show over 38 million passengers by 2026, highlighting ongoing interest. Electric and hybrid propulsion, shore power, biofuels, and fuel-saving technologies are slowly becoming standard.
Challenges remain. Reducing cruise carbon intensity to levels similar to other travel modes will require more alternative fuels, stricter rules, and continued innovation.
Still, many cruise lines have pledged net-zero targets, often aligned with global shipping goals. Passengers are also more aware of environmental impact, driving demand for greener cruises.
Balancing Growth and Emissions
Royal Caribbean’s strong earnings and positive outlook show a resilient and growing industry. Record bookings and strategic investments indicate financial health and long-term growth.
However, carbon emissions remain a major issue. Cruises generally produce more CO₂ per passenger than many other vacations. Cruising is also considered to emit the most emissions compared to other travel methods. Thus, the industry faces pressure to reduce this impact.
Understanding both the financial and environmental sides can help travelers make better choices. For cruise companies and policymakers, balancing growth with emissions reductions is key for the future of cruising.
The post Royal Caribbean’s (RCL) Record 2025 Profits Meet Carbon Challenges of the Cruise Industry appeared first on Carbon Credits.
-
Greenhouse Gases6 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change6 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Spanish-language misinformation on renewable energy spreads online, report shows
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits




