Global carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels and cement have increased by 1.1% in 2023, hitting a new record high of 36.8bn tonnes of CO2 (GtCO2), according to the 2023 Global Carbon Budget report by the Global Carbon Project.
The new report finds that the increase in fossil emissions in 2023 has been largely driven by increased emissions in China – without which the global total would have remained approximately flat at 2022 levels.
Total global CO2 emissions – including land use and fossil CO2 – increased by approximately 0.5% in 2023, driven by a combination of a small drop in land-use emissions, but an increase in fossil CO2 emissions.
However, total CO2 emissions remain ever so slightly below the highs set in 2019 and have been relatively flat since 2015.
The 18th edition of the Global Carbon Budget, which is published today, also reveals:
- Global land-use emissions have likely been falling over the past two decades, driven by decreasing rates of deforestation in Brazil and other countries. However, land-use emissions remain highly uncertain and trends should be interpreted with caution.
- Most of the increase in fossil emissions was from coal and oil. Global coal emissions reached a new record high, though oil emissions still remain below pre-pandemic levels. Gas emissions and those from cement and other sources remained relatively unchanged.
- China’s fossil CO2 emissions are estimated to be up 4% this year, while India’s are up 8.2%. US and European Union emissions are expected to fall by 3% and 7.5%, respectively.
- Emissions from international aviation and shipping have grown by an estimated 11.9% in 2023, reflecting a 28% increase in aviation emissions (as the sector continues to recover from pandemic lows) and a 1% increase in shipping emissions.
- Global CO2 concentrations in 2023 set a new record of 419.3 parts per million (ppm), up 2.4ppm from 2022 levels. Atmospheric CO2 concentrations are now 51% above pre-industrial levels.
Global CO2 emissions virtually tie 2019 record
While CO2 emissions from fossil fuels have exceeded pre-pandemic levels over the past two years, total CO2 global emissions – which includes those from land-use change – have remained marginally below 2019’s record of 40.9GtCO2.
In 2023, the global total effectively tied the 2019 record. The central estimate provided by the Global Carbon Budget is 0.1% lower than the prior record, though the large uncertainties – particularly for land-use change emissions – reduces confidence in the relative ranking of the two.
Each year the Global Carbon Budget is estimated to include the latest data as well as improvements to modelling sources and sinks, resulting in some year-to-year revisions to the historical record.
The figure below shows the 2023 (dark blue solid line), 2022 (yellow dotted), 2021 (bright blue dotted) and 2020 (red dotted) global CO2 emissions estimates, along with the uncertainty (shaded area) of the new 2023 budget.
The 2023 figures are quite similar to the 2022 numbers over the past decade, though it shows somewhat higher emissions during the 1980s and 1990s.

Annual total global CO2 emissions – from fossil and land-use change – between 1959 and 2023 for the 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023 versions of the Global Carbon Project’s Global Carbon Budget, in billions of tonnes of CO2 per year (GtCO2). Shaded area shows the estimated one-sigma uncertainty for the 2023 budget. Data from the Global Carbon Project; chart by Carbon Brief.
Growth in total CO2 emissions has substantially slowed down over the past decade (2013-22), with an average growth of 0.14% per year. This is much lower than the 2.1% per year average growth rate over the previous decade (2003-12) and the longer-term average growth rate of 1.7% between 1959 and 2012.
The continued growth in fossil-fuel emissions has been largely counterbalanced by a slight decline in land-use emissions. However, the uncertainties surrounding land-use emissions remain quite large. As more data is collected there may be upward or downward revisions in the record over the past decade – as seen in both 2021 and 2022 versions of the Global Carbon Budget.
The figure below breaks down global emissions (black line) in the 2023 budget into fossil and (grey) land-use (yellow) components. Fossil CO2 emissions represent the bulk of total global emissions in recent years, accounting for approximately 90% of emissions in 2023 (compared to 10% for land-use). This represents a large change from the first half of the 20th century, when land-use emissions were approximately the same as fossil emissions.
Global fossil emissions include CO2 emitted from burning coal, oil and gas, as well as the production of cement. However, the Global Carbon Budget also subtracts the cement carbonation sink – CO2 slowly absorbed by cement once it is exposed to the air – from fossil emissions in each year to determine total fossil emissions.

Global CO2 emissions separated out into from fossil and land-use change components between 1959 and 2023 from the 2023 Global Carbon Budget. Note that fossil CO2 emissions are inclusive of the cement carbonation sink. Data from the Global Carbon Project; chart by Carbon Brief.
Recent analyses by both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and Climate Analytics have suggested that global fossil emissions may peak in 2023, as the growth of clean energy accelerates and fossil fuel use declines.
However, hopes for an imminent peak in global emissions should be tempered by past failed predictions. Back in 2016, there were suggestions that global emissions had peaked and would decline. Similarly, a number of researchers (including one of the authors of this article) estimated that fossil emissions would peak in 2019 in the wake of Covid-19 disruptions. In reality, fossil emissions set new records in both 2022 and 2023.
It is also important to emphasise that stopping the growth of CO2 emissions does not stop CO2 from accumulating in the atmosphere or stop the world continuing to warm. For warming to stop, global CO2 emissions need to not only peak, but rapidly fall to net-zero.
Land-use emissions
The Global Carbon Budget estimates that land-use emissions will be 4.1GtCO2 in 2023, down around 5% from 2022 and continuing a small downward trend over the past two decades. However, despite declines in land-use emissions from deforestation, they remain substantially higher than CO2 removals from intentional reforestation and afforestation projects.
The Global Carbon Project now provides a database of land-use emissions by country, though it does not provide country-level emissions through to 2023 yet. The figure below highlights the four countries with the largest land-use emissions in 2022 – Brazil (grey shading), Indonesia (red), the Democratic Republic of Congo (bright blue) and China (yellow) – as well as land-use emissions in the rest of the world (purple).

Annual CO2 emissions from land-use change by major emitting countries and the rest of world from 1959-2022. Note that country-level land-use change emissions are not yet available for 2023. Data from the Global Carbon Project; chart by Carbon Brief.
The decline in global land-use emissions over the past two decades was driven in part by decreasing rates of deforestation in countries such as Brazil, as well as slightly increasing removals of CO2 from reforestation and afforestation projects.
However, these estimates are subject to large uncertainties – as recently as 2020 researchers thought land-use emissions had been increasing – and the Global Carbon Budget authors suggest that long-term trends should be interpreted with caution.
This year’s budget provides a first estimate of how land-use emissions break down into different categories. They find that permanent deforestation is responsible for emissions of around 4.2GtCO2 per year, with around 1.9GtCO2 removed per year by reforestation and afforestation.
(In addition, there is currently a tiny 0.00001GtCO2 removed by permanent carbon removal technologies, such as direct air capture and enhanced rock weathering.)
Deforestation due to shifting cultivation cycles (where deforestation is temporary before land is abandoned to return to forest cover) is responsible for emissions of around 2.9GtCO2 per year, while regrowth in previously cultivated areas removes around 2.8GtCO2 per year. This results in only a small net source of emissions (~0.1GtCO2 per year).
The harvesting of trees for wood (as well as other forest management) leads to net emissions of around 0.8GtCO2 per year, as deforestation for timber production is higher than regrowth rates globally – though this will vary substantially by country and region.
Finally, other emissions from land management, such as peat drainage and burning as well as other land transitions, are responsible for around 1.4GtCO2 per year.
Emissions from wildfires are also presented in the new report, which notes that it is not an additional CO2 source – rather, forest fires are part of the net land carbon sink (or included as land-use emissions if triggered by humans for deforestation purposes).
Chinese emissions drive rising global fossil CO2
Global emissions of fossil CO2 – including coal, oil, gas and cement – increased by around 1.1% in 2023, relative to 2022, with an uncertainty range of 0.0% to 2.1%. This represents a new record high and is 1.4% above the 2019 pre-Covid levels.
The figure below shows global CO2 emissions from fossil fuels, divided into emissions from China (red shading), India (yellow), the US (bright blue), EU (dark blue) and the remainder of the world (grey).

Annual fossil CO2 emissions by major countries and the rest of the world from 1959-2023, excluding the cement carbonation sink as national-level values are not available. Data from the Global Carbon Project; chart by Carbon Brief.
China represents 31% of global CO2 emissions. Their emissions in 2023 are projected to increase by 4% (with an uncertainty range of 1.9% to 6.1%), driven by a rise in emissions from coal (+3.3%), oil (+9.9%) and natural gas (+6.5%). The strong growth in Chinese emissions in 2023 is partly due to a delayed rebound from Covid-19 lockdowns.
India represents 8% of global emissions. In 2023, Indian emissions are projected to increase by 8.2% (ranging from 6.7% to 9.7%), with a 9.5% increase in emissions from coal, a 5.3% increase in emissions from oil, a 5.6% increase in emissions from natural gas and a 8.8% increase in emissions from cement.
The large growth in coal in India is being driven by rapid increases in electricity demand. While India is installing large amounts of renewable energy, it is still far from sufficient to meet the growth in demand. Emissions from India now exceed those from the European Union, though they remain much smaller on a per-capita basis.
The US represents 14% of global emissions (though is responsible for a much larger portion of historical emissions and associated atmospheric accumulation of CO2). US emissions are projected to decrease by 3% in 2023 (ranging from -5.0% to -1.0%). This is being driven by a large decrease in coal emissions, which are expected to fall by more than 18% compared with 2022 levels. Oil emissions are expected to decline by a slight 0.3%, reflecting the rise of electric vehicles, while emissions from gas are expected to increase by 1.4%.
The European Union represents 7% of global emissions. EU emissions are expected to decrease by a sizable 7.4% in 2023, driven by a 18.8% decline in coal emissions, a 1.5% decline in oil emissions and a 6.6% decline in natural gas emissions (driven in part by higher prices and the phaseout of Russian gas).
A combination of rapidly increasing renewable capacity, electric vehicle adoption, lower energy demand and generally high fossil energy prices are driving fairly rapid emissions reductions.
The rest of the world represents 40% of global emissions, of which 2.8% is international aviation and shipping. Emissions in the rest of the world are expected to grow by 0.4% in 2023 – though this is entirely due to growth in international aviation and shipping, which are expected to grow by 11.9% (reflecting a 28% increase in aviation emissions and a 1% increase in shipping emissions). The large increase in aviation emissions reflects the ongoing recovery from pandemic-era declines.
Excluding international aviation and shipping, emissions in the rest of the world are expected to fall by 0.4%.
The total emissions for each year between 2019 and 2023, as well as the countries and regions that were responsible for the changes in absolute emissions, are shown in the figure below. Annual emissions for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and estimates for 2023 are shown by the black bars. The coloured bars show the change in emissions between each set of years, broken down by country or region – the US (bright blue), European Union (dark blue), China (red), India (yellow) and the rest of the world (grey). Negative values show reductions in emissions, while positive values reflect emission increases.

Annual global CO2 emissions from fossil fuels (black bars) and drivers of changes between years by country (coloured bars), excluding the cement carbonation sink as national-level values are not available. Negative values indicate reductions in emissions. Note that the y-axis does not start at zero. Data from the Global Carbon Project; chart by Carbon Brief.
In the absence of an increase in Chinese emissions, global CO2 emissions would have remained flat between 2022 and 2023, with declines in the US, the EU and the rest of the world counterbalancing increases in India and in shipping and aviation.
The large (0.5GtCO2) increase in Chinese emissions relative to 2022 resulted in an overall year-over-year increase in global fossil CO2.
However, there is reason to think that the large increase in Chinese emissions in 2023 will not persist, given that it in part reflected economic recovery after extended Covid lockdowns. As a recent Carbon Brief guest post argued, the combination of slowing economic growth and rapidly expanding clean energy deployments suggests that Chinese emissions might fall in 2024, though it is too early to know with confidence.
The Global Carbon Project also notes that emissions have declined over the past decade (2013-22) in 26 nations despite continued domestic economic growth, representing a long-term decoupling of CO2 emissions and the economy.
These countries include Belgium, Brazil, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland, UK, US and Zimbabwe. Collectively they represent 28% of global emissions.
Coal emissions reach record highs
Global fossil fuel emissions primarily result from the combustion of coal, oil and natural gas. Coal is responsible for more emissions than any other fossil fuel, representing approximately 41% of global fossil CO2 emissions in 2023. Oil is the second largest contributor at 32% of fossil CO2, while gas rounds out the pack at 21%.
These percentages reflect both the amount of each fossil fuel consumed globally, but also differences in CO2 intensities. Coal results in the most CO2 emitted per unit of heat or energy produced, followed by oil and natural gas.
The figure below shows global CO2 emissions from different fuels over time, covering coal (grey shading), oil (red) and gas (blue), as well as cement production (yellow) and other sources (purple). While coal emissions increased rapidly in the mid-2000s, it has largely plateaued since 2013. However, coal use increased significantly in 2021 and modestly in 2022 and 2023.

Annual CO2 emissions by fossil fuel from 1959-2023, excluding the cement carbonation sink. Data from the Global Carbon Project; chart by Carbon Brief.
Global emissions from coal increased by 1.1% in 2023 compared to 2023, while oil emissions increased 1.5% and gas emissions increased by 0.47%. Emissions from cement and other sources increased by 0.64%.
Despite setting a new record this year, global coal use is only 4% above 2011 levels – a full 12 years ago. By contrast, during the 2000s, global coal use grew at a rate of around 4% every single year.
The total emissions for each year between 2019 and 2023 (black bars), as well as the absolute change in emissions for each fuel between years, are shown in the figure below.

Annual global CO2 emissions from fossil fuels (black bars) and drivers of changes between years by fuel (coloured bars), excluding the cement carbonation sink. Negative values indicate reductions in emissions. Note that the y-axis does not start at zero. Data from the Global Carbon Project; chart by Carbon Brief.
Even though they have been increasing over the past three years, global CO2 emissions from oil remain below pre-pandemic highs of 2019.
Similarly, emissions from natural gas decreased notably in 2022 and were flat in 2023, reflecting the effect of higher prices due to geopolitical instability associated with the conflict in Ukraine.
The global carbon budget
Every year, the Global Carbon Project provides an estimate of the overall “global carbon budget”. This is based on estimates of the release of CO2 through human activity and its uptake by the oceans and land, with the remainder adding to atmospheric concentrations of the gas.
(This differs from the commonly used term “carbon budget”, referring to the amount of CO2 that can be released while keeping warming below global limits of 1.5 or 2C.)
The most recent budget, including estimated values for 2023, is shown in the figure below. Values above zero represent sources of CO2 – from fossil fuels and industry (grey shading) and land use (yellow) – while values below zero represent “carbon sinks” that remove CO2 from the atmosphere. Any CO2 emissions that are not absorbed by the oceans (dark blue) or land vegetation (green) accumulate in the atmosphere (blue).

Annual global carbon budget of sources and sinks from 1959-2023. Fossil CO2 emissions include the cement carbonation sink. Note that the budget does not fully balance every year due to remaining uncertainties, particularly in sinks. Data from the Global Carbon Project; chart by Carbon Brief.
The ocean takes up around 26% of total human emissions, or around 10.4GtCO2 per year. The ocean CO2 sink has been relatively flat from 2019 to 2022 due to persistent La Niña conditions (which tend to result in lower ocean CO2 uptake), but increased in 2023 in response to the emerging El Niño event.
The land sink takes up around 31% of global emissions, or 12.3GtCO2 per year on average. However, the land sink is expected to be notably lower in 2023 – only 10.4GtCO2 – due to the effect of El Niño on global vegetation.
Global CO2 emissions from fires were above average this year – at 7-8GtCO2 over the first 10 months of the year – largely due to the extreme wildfire season in Canada.
While fire emissions are presented alongside the global carbon budget for the first time in the 2023 report, a direct comparison cannot be made between fire emissions and other carbon budget components as they already show up in both parts of the land sink and land use emissions.
Overall, the impact of the ongoing emissions from human activity is that atmospheric CO2 continues to increase.
The growth rate of atmospheric CO2 in 2023 is expected to be around 2.4ppm, which matches the average rate over the past decade (2013-22). The emerging El Niño event is expected to contribute to a somewhat higher growth of atmospheric CO2 in 2024.
Atmosphere accumulation hits new heights
More than 40% of human emissions since the industrial revolution have accumulated in the atmosphere, with the remainder absorbed by land and ocean sinks.
The upper chart in the figure below shows the cumulative human emissions (dark blue line) and atmospheric CO2 accumulation (red) since 1750. The lower chart shows the percentage of cumulative emissions remaining in the atmosphere.

Cumulative CO2 emissions from fossil fuels (with the carbonation sink removed) and land use as well as atmospheric CO2 accumulation between 1750 and 2023 (top). Percentage of cumulative CO2 emissions remaining in the atmosphere over time (bottom). Data from the Global Carbon Project; chart by Carbon Brief.
The fact that global emissions substantially exceed atmospheric accumulation is a clear sign that the increase in atmospheric CO2 is due to human emissions, and that other natural systems including the ocean and biosphere are net sinks rather than sources.
This is reinforced by direct measurements showing that both are absorbing more carbon from the atmosphere over time.
The fact that less than half of human-caused emissions remain in the atmosphere over time is, ultimately, a good thing; it means that the world has experienced much less severe climate change than if all emissions remained in the atmosphere.
However, as the world continues to warm, the oceans and potentially the land will become less able to absorb a portion of our emissions. This means that the portion of human emissions remaining in the atmosphere is expected to increase in future.
The post Analysis: Growth of Chinese fossil CO2 emissions drives new global record in 2023 appeared first on Carbon Brief.
Analysis: Growth of Chinese fossil CO2 emissions drives new global record in 2023
Climate Change
DeBriefed 15 August 2025: Raging wildfires; Xi’s priorities; Factchecking the Trump climate report
Welcome to Carbon Brief’s DeBriefed.
An essential guide to the week’s key developments relating to climate change.
This week
Blazing heat hits Europe
FANNING THE FLAMES: Wildfires “fanned by a heatwave and strong winds” caused havoc across southern Europe, Reuters reported. It added: “Fire has affected nearly 440,000 hectares (1,700 square miles) in the eurozone so far in 2025, double the average for the same period of the year since 2006.” Extreme heat is “breaking temperature records across Europe”, the Guardian said, with several countries reporting readings of around 40C.
HUMAN TOLL: At least three people have died in the wildfires erupting across Spain, Turkey and Albania, France24 said, adding that the fires have “displaced thousands in Greece and Albania”. Le Monde reported that a child in Italy “died of heatstroke”, while thousands were evacuated from Spain and firefighters “battled three large wildfires” in Portugal.
UK WILDFIRE RISK: The UK saw temperatures as high as 33.4C this week as England “entered its fourth heatwave”, BBC News said. The high heat is causing “nationally significant” water shortfalls, it added, “hitting farms, damaging wildlife and increasing wildfires”. The Daily Mirror noted that these conditions “could last until mid-autumn”. Scientists warn the UK faces possible “firewaves” due to climate change, BBC News also reported.
Around the world
- GRID PRESSURES: Iraq suffered a “near nationwide blackout” as elevated power demand – due to extreme temperatures of around 50C – triggered a transmission line failure, Bloomberg reported.
- ‘DIRE’ DOWN UNDER: The Australian government is keeping a climate risk assessment that contains “dire” implications for the continent “under wraps”, the Australian Financial Review said.
- EXTREME RAINFALL: Mexico City is “seeing one of its heaviest rainy seasons in years”, the Washington Post said. Downpours in the Japanese island of Kyushu “caused flooding and mudslides”, according to Politico. In Kashmir, flash floods killed 56 and left “scores missing”, the Associated Press said.
- SOUTH-SOUTH COOPERATION: China and Brazil agreed to “ensure the success” of COP30 in a recent phone call, Chinese state news agency Xinhua reported.
- PLASTIC ‘DEADLOCK’: Talks on a plastic pollution treaty have failed again at a summit in Geneva, according to the Guardian, with countries “deadlocked” on whether it should include “curbs on production and toxic chemicals”.
15
The number of times by which the most ethnically-diverse areas in England are more likely to experience extreme heat than its “least diverse” areas, according to new analysis by Carbon Brief.
Latest climate research
- As many as 13 minerals critical for low-carbon energy may face shortages under 2C pathways | Nature Climate Change
- A “scoping review” examined the impact of climate change on poor sexual and reproductive health and rights in sub-Saharan Africa | PLOS One
- A UK university cut the carbon footprint of its weekly canteen menu by 31% “without students noticing” | Nature Food
(For more, see Carbon Brief’s in-depth daily summaries of the top climate news stories on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday.)
Captured
Factchecking Trump’s climate report

A report commissioned by the US government to justify rolling back climate regulations contains “at least 100 false or misleading statements”, according to a Carbon Brief factcheck involving dozens of leading climate scientists. The report, compiled in two months by five hand-picked researchers, inaccurately claims that “CO2-induced warming might be less damaging economically than commonly believed” and misleadingly states that “excessively aggressive [emissions] mitigation policies could prove more detrimental than beneficial”80
Spotlight
Does Xi Jinping care about climate change?
This week, Carbon Brief unpacks new research on Chinese president Xi Jinping’s policy priorities.
On this day in 2005, Xi Jinping, a local official in eastern China, made an unplanned speech when touring a small village – a rare occurrence in China’s highly-choreographed political culture.
In it, he observed that “lucid waters and lush mountains are mountains of silver and gold” – that is, the environment cannot be sacrificed for the sake of growth.
(The full text of the speech is not available, although Xi discussed the concept in a brief newspaper column – see below – a few days later.)
In a time where most government officials were laser-focused on delivering economic growth, this message was highly unusual.
Forward-thinking on environment
As a local official in the early 2000s, Xi endorsed the concept of “green GDP”, which integrates the value of natural resources and the environment into GDP calculations.
He also penned a regular newspaper column, 22 of which discussed environmental protection – although “climate change” was never mentioned.
This focus carried over to China’s national agenda when Xi became president.
New research from the Asia Society Policy Institute tracked policies in which Xi is reported by state media to have “personally” taken action.
It found that environmental protection is one of six topics in which he is often said to have directly steered policymaking.
Such policies include guidelines to build a “Beautiful China”, the creation of an environmental protection inspection team and the “three-north shelterbelt” afforestation programme.
“It’s important to know what Xi’s priorities are because the top leader wields outsized influence in the Chinese political system,” Neil Thomas, Asia Society Policy Institute fellow and report co-author, told Carbon Brief.
Local policymakers are “more likely” to invest resources in addressing policies they know have Xi’s attention, to increase their chances for promotion, he added.
What about climate and energy?
However, the research noted, climate and energy policies have not been publicised as bearing Xi’s personal touch.
“I think Xi prioritises environmental protection more than climate change because reducing pollution is an issue of social stability,” Thomas said, noting that “smoggy skies and polluted rivers” were more visible and more likely to trigger civil society pushback than gradual temperature increases.
The paper also said topics might not be linked to Xi personally when they are “too technical” or “politically sensitive”.
For example, Xi’s landmark decision for China to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060 is widely reported as having only been made after climate modelling – facilitated by former climate envoy Xie Zhenhua – showed that this goal was achievable.
Prior to this, Xi had never spoken publicly about carbon neutrality.
Prof Alex Wang, a University of California, Los Angeles professor of law not involved in the research, noted that emphasising Xi’s personal attention may signal “top” political priorities, but not necessarily Xi’s “personal interests”.
By not emphasising climate, he said, Xi may be trying to avoid “pushing the system to overprioritise climate to the exclusion of the other priorities”.
There are other ways to know where climate ranks on the policy agenda, Thomas noted:
“Climate watchers should look at what Xi says, what Xi does and what policies Xi authorises in the name of the ‘central committee’. Is Xi talking more about climate? Is Xi establishing institutions and convening meetings that focus on climate? Is climate becoming a more prominent theme in top-level documents?”
Watch, read, listen
TRUMP EFFECT: The Columbia Energy Exchange podcast examined how pressure from US tariffs could affect India’s clean energy transition.
NAMIBIAN ‘DESTRUCTION’: The National Observer investigated the failure to address “human rights abuses and environmental destruction” claims against a Canadian oil company in Namibia.
‘RED AI’: The Network for the Digital Economy and the Environment studied the state of current research on “Red AI”, or the “negative environmental implications of AI”.
Coming up
- 17 August: Bolivian general elections
- 18-29 August: Preparatory talks on the entry into force of the “High Seas Treaty”, New York
- 18-22 August: Y20 Summit, Johannesburg
- 21 August: Advancing the “Africa clean air programme” through Africa-Asia collaboration, Yokohama
Pick of the jobs
- Lancaster Environment Centre, senior research associate: JUST Centre | Salary: £39,355-£45,413. Location: Lancaster, UK
- Environmental Justice Foundation, communications and media officer, Francophone Africa | Salary: XOF600,000-XOF800,000. Location: Dakar, Senegal
- Politico, energy & climate editor | Salary: Unknown. Location: Brussels, Belgium
- EnviroCatalysts, meteorologist | Salary: Unknown. Location: New Delhi, India
DeBriefed is edited by Daisy Dunne. Please send any tips or feedback to debriefed@carbonbrief.org.
This is an online version of Carbon Brief’s weekly DeBriefed email newsletter. Subscribe for free here.
The post DeBriefed 15 August 2025: Raging wildfires; Xi’s priorities; Factchecking the Trump climate report appeared first on Carbon Brief.
DeBriefed 15 August 2025: Raging wildfires; Xi’s priorities; Factchecking the Trump climate report
Climate Change
New York Already Denied Permits to These Gas Pipelines. Under Trump, They Could Get Greenlit
The specter of a “gas-for-wind” compromise between the governor and the White House is drawing the ire of residents as a deadline looms.
Hundreds of New Yorkers rallied against new natural gas pipelines in their state as a deadline loomed for the public to comment on a revived proposal to expand the gas pipeline that supplies downstate New York.
New York Already Denied Permits to These Gas Pipelines. Under Trump, They Could Get Greenlit
Climate Change
Factcheck: Trump’s climate report includes more than 100 false or misleading claims
A “critical assessment” report commissioned by the Trump administration to justify a rollback of US climate regulations contains at least 100 false or misleading statements, according to a Carbon Brief factcheck involving dozens of leading climate scientists.
The report – “A critical review of impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on the US climate” – was published by the US Department of Energy (DoE) on 23 July, just days before the government laid out plans to revoke a scientific finding used as the legal basis for emissions regulation.
The executive summary of the controversial report inaccurately claims that “CO2-induced warming might be less damaging economically than commonly believed”.
It also states misleadingly that “excessively aggressive [emissions] mitigation policies could prove more detrimental than beneficial”.
Compiled in just two months by five “independent” researchers hand-selected by the climate-sceptic US secretary of energy Chris Wright, the document has sparked fierce criticism from climate scientists, who have pointed to factual errors, misrepresentation of research, messy citations and the cherry-picking of data.
Experts have also noted the authors’ track record of promoting views at odds with the mainstream understanding of climate science.
Wright’s department claims the report – which is currently open to public comment as part of a 30-day review – underwent an “internal peer-review period amongst [the] DoE’s scientific research community”.
The report is designed to provide a scientific underpinning to one flank of the Trump administration’s plans to rescind a finding that serves as the legal prerequisite for federal emissions regulation. (The second flank is about legal authority to regulate emissions.)
The “endangerment finding” – enacted by the Obama administration in 2009 – states that six greenhouse gases are contributing to the net-negative impacts of climate change and, thus, put the public in danger.
In a press release on 29 July, the US Environmental Protection Agency said “updated studies and information” set out in the new report would “challenge the assumptions” of the 2009 finding.
Carbon Brief asked a wide range of climate scientists, including those cited in the “critical review” itself, to factcheck the report’s various claims and statements.
The post Factcheck: Trump’s climate report includes more than 100 false or misleading claims appeared first on Carbon Brief.
https://www.carbonbrief.org/factcheck-trumps-climate-report-includes-more-than-100-false-or-misleading-claims/
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Spanish-language misinformation on renewable energy spreads online, report shows
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Carbon Footprint1 year ago
US SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Why airlines are perfect targets for anti-greenwashing legal action
-
Renewable Energy2 months ago
US Grid Strain, Possible Allete Sale
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Some firms unaware of England’s new single-use plastic ban