Amazon is diving deep into nuclear power as part of its ambitious data-center expansion plan, investing over $52 billion across three U.S. states. The e-commerce giant has inked 3 key deals to explore and develop small modular reactors (SMRs).
SMRs are a new type of nuclear technology that promises more efficient, compact, and clean power generation. AWS CEO Matt Garman noted that SMRs present unique potential to provide scalable and reliable power to meet the ever-growing energy needs of data centers.
Shares of nuclear companies surged following Amazon’s announcement of the agreements. Nano Nuclear Energy and Nuscale Power saw their shares rise nearly 10% in premarket trading, while Oklo experienced an over 11% increase.
Small Reactors, Big Ambitions
SMRs are advanced nuclear reactors designed to be less than 10% of the size of traditional nuclear plants. But they can generate up to about ⅓ of the power output of traditional reactors. As such, they allow for easier deployment and integration into the energy grid.
Developers aim to have these reactors generating electricity by the early 2030s, contingent on receiving approval from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to build and operate their designs, as well as proving the technology’s viability.
Amazon’s most recent collaboration with Dominion Energy, a $48 billion market-cap utility company, aims to explore the deployment of SMRs in Virginia near Dominion’s North Anna power station in Louisa County.
Virginia hosts nearly half of all U.S. data centers, with a significant concentration in Northern Virginia, particularly in the Data Center Alley, located in Loudoun County. It is estimated that 70% of the world’s internet traffic passes through Data Center Alley each day.

The region has experienced a doubling of power demand over the last 5 years. It is also projected to see a 4x increase over the next 15 years. The planned SMR could contribute at least 300 megawatts of power, which could support multiple data centers in the region.
AWS has committed to investing $35 billion by 2040 to develop multiple data center campuses across Virginia, as announced by Governor Youngkin last year.
Nuclear Meets the Cloud: Dominion, X-Energy, and Amazon
Garman emphasized that the push for nuclear is part of Amazon’s broader goal of achieving net-zero emissions by 2040. He noted that:
“We see the need for gigawatts of power in the coming years, and there’s not going to be enough wind and solar projects to be able to meet the needs, and so nuclear is a great opportunity.”
The specific targets for nuclear’s contribution to AWS’s power needs remain undisclosed. But Garman noted that Amazon hopes SMRs will be a “material source of power generation” by 2040.
Alongside the Dominion deal, Amazon announced agreements to develop SMRs in Washington state with Energy Northwest, a public power agency, and to back X-energy, an advanced nuclear startup.
X-energy is building its first SMR project in Seadrift, Texas, in collaboration with Dow Chemical. Amazon is providing significant financial support to X-energy, anchoring a $500 million investment through its Climate Pledge Fund. This commitment aims to bring 5 gigawatts of SMR-based energy online across the U.S. by 2039.
Why Small Modular Reactors?
The said SMRs could power entire mid-sized cities, but for Amazon, they’re integral to supporting the energy-intensive demands of data centers, especially those driven by artificial intelligence (AI). Data centers require stable and continuous energy supplies, something that SMRs, unlike intermittent renewable sources like wind or solar, can reliably offer.
With capacities of up to 300 megawatts, SMRs can be tailored to meet local energy demands, making them suitable for data centers and other energy-intensive operations. X-energy’s Xe-100 reactor, for example, can produce 80 megawatts of power per unit, with the flexibility to scale up by deploying multiple reactors at a single site.
Another key advantage is the carbon-free nature of nuclear power, aligning with Amazon’s goal of reducing its environmental impact. Unlike fossil fuels, nuclear energy does not produce greenhouse gas emissions during operation. Thus, it offers a reliable solution for tech companies seeking to curb their carbon footprints.
AWS, like its peers, is committed to cutting emissions, but it has faced challenges. In 2023, Amazon’s carbon footprint was just under 69 million metric tons of CO2, slightly lower than its peak in 2021 but still substantial.

Beyond Virginia
Beyond its partnership with Dominion in Virginia, Amazon is also eyeing other regions for SMR projects. In Washington, it is collaborating with Energy Northwest to build an SMR near the Columbia Generating Station in Richland. This project aims to provide up to 960 megawatts of power, with Amazon securing the rights to purchase electricity from the first 320 megawatts produced.
This flexibility makes SMRs appealing for scaling energy projects across different regions. It enables Amazon to replicate its nuclear model wherever energy demand is high. AWS recently acquired a 960-megawatt data center campus in Pennsylvania from Talen Energy, which includes access to fixed-price nuclear power from Talen’s Susquehanna nuclear plant.
Amazon’s Nuclear Bet to Meet Data Center Demand
Amazon’s venture into nuclear power mirrors a broader industry trend. Google recently announced its own SMR project with Kairos Power. Similarly, Constellation Energy is planning to restart operations at the iconic Three Mile Island to power Microsoft’s data centers. Sundar Pichai, Google’s CEO, expressed optimism about the potential of SMRs, highlighting the surge of capital and innovation driving the technology forward.
X-energy CEO Clay Sell sees a significant opportunity in this trend, noting that demand for nuclear energy, especially in the context of AI’s energy requirements, is reshaping how companies think about power in the U.S.
The Biden administration has invested billions into clean energy initiatives. As part of Amazon Web Services’ recent announcement, U.S. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm revealed that an additional $900 million in funding is now available for projects aiming to deploy SMRs. This funding supports the broader push to accelerate clean and reliable energy solutions across the nation.
For Amazon, SMRs represent a promising path forward. While the journey to widespread deployment of advanced nuclear technology is fraught with challenges, the potential payoff—a more resilient, sustainable energy future—makes the effort worthwhile.
The post Amazon Turns to Nuclear and SMRs For Its $52B Data Center Expansion appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Climate Impact Partners Unveils High-Quality Carbon Credits from Sabah Rainforest in Malaysia
The voluntary carbon market is changing. Buyers are no longer focused only on large volumes of cheap credits. Instead, they want projects with strong science, long-term monitoring, and clear proof that carbon has truly been removed from the atmosphere. That shift is drawing more attention to high-integrity, nature-based projects.
One project now gaining that spotlight is the Sabah INFAPRO rainforest rehabilitation project in Malaysia. Climate Impact Partners announced that the project is now issuing verified carbon removal credits, opening access to one of the highest-quality nature-based removals currently available in the global market.
Restoring One of the World’s Richest Rainforest Ecosystems
The project is located in Sabah, Malaysia, on the island of Borneo. This region is home to tropical dipterocarp rainforest, one of the richest forest ecosystems on Earth. These forests store huge amounts of carbon and support extraordinary biodiversity. Some dipterocarp trees can grow up to 70 meters tall, creating habitat for orangutans, pygmy elephants, gibbons, sun bears, and the critically endangered Sumatran rhino.
However, the forest within the INFAPRO project area was not intact. In the 1980s, selective logging removed many of the most valuable tree species, especially large dipterocarps. That caused serious ecological damage. Once the key mother trees were gone, natural regeneration became much harder. Young seedlings also had to compete with dense vines and shrubs, which slowed the forest’s recovery.
To repair that damage, the INFAPRO project was launched in the Ulu-Segama forestry management unit in eastern Sabah.
- The project has restored more than 25,000 hectares of logged-over rainforest.
- It was developed by Face the Future in cooperation with Yayasan Sabah, while Climate Impact Partners has supported the project and helped bring its credits to market.
Why Sabah’s Carbon Removals are Attracting Attention
What makes Sabah INFAPRO different is not only the size of the restoration effort. It is also the way the project measured carbon gains.

Many forest carbon projects issue credits in annual vintages based on year-by-year growth estimates. Sabah INFAPRO followed a different path. It used a landscape-scale monitoring system and waited until the forest moved through its strongest natural growth period before issuing removal credits.
- This approach gives the credits more weight. Rather than relying mainly on short-term annual estimates, the project measured carbon sequestration over a longer period. That helps show that the forest delivered real, sustained, and measurable carbon removal.
The scientific backing is also unusually strong. Since 2007, the project has maintained nearly 400 permanent monitoring plots. These plots have allowed researchers, independent auditors, and technical specialists to observe the full growth cycle of dipterocarp forest recovery. The result is a large body of field data that supports carbon calculations and strengthens confidence in the credits.
In simple terms, buyers are not just being asked to trust a model. They are being shown years of direct forest monitoring across the project landscape.
Strong Ratings Support Market Confidence
Independent assessment has also lifted the project’s profile. BeZero awarded Sabah INFAPRO an A.pre overall rating and an AA score for permanence. That places the project among the highest-rated Improved Forest Management, or IFM, projects in the world.
The rating reflects several important strengths. First, the project has very low exposure to reversal risk. Second, it has a long and stable operating history. Third, its measured carbon gains align well with peer-reviewed ecological research and independent analysis.
These points matter in today’s market. Buyers have become more cautious after years of debate over the quality of some forest carbon credits. As a result, they now look more closely at durability, transparency, and third-party validation. Sabah INFAPRO’s rating helps answer those concerns and makes the project more attractive to companies looking for credible carbon removal.
The project is also registered with Verra’s Verified Carbon Standard under the name INFAPRO Rehabilitation of Logged-over Dipterocarp Forest in Sabah, Malaysia. That adds another level of market recognition and verification.
A Wider Model for Rainforest Recovery
Sabah INFAPRO also shows why high-quality nature-based projects are about more than carbon alone. The restoration effort supports broader ecological recovery in one of the world’s most important rainforest regions.
Climate Impact Partners said it has worked with project partners to restore degraded areas, run local training programs, carry out monthly forest patrols, and distribute seedlings to support rainforest recovery beyond the project boundary. These efforts help strengthen the wider landscape and expand the project’s environmental impact.
That broader value is becoming more important for buyers. Companies increasingly want projects that support biodiversity, ecosystem health, and local engagement, along with carbon removal. Sabah INFAPRO offers that mix, making it a stronger fit for the market’s shift toward higher-integrity credits.

The post Climate Impact Partners Unveils High-Quality Carbon Credits from Sabah Rainforest in Malaysia appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Bitcoin Falls as Energy Prices Rise: Why Crypto Is Now an Energy Market Story
Bitcoin’s recent drop below $70,000 reflects more than short-term market pressure. It signals a deeper shift. The world’s largest cryptocurrency is becoming increasingly tied to global energy markets.
For years, Bitcoin has moved mainly on investor sentiment, adoption trends, and regulation. Today, another force is shaping its direction: the cost of energy.
As oil prices rise and electricity markets tighten, Bitcoin is starting to behave less like a tech asset and more like an energy-dependent system. This shift is changing how investors, analysts, and policymakers understand crypto.
A Global Power Consumer: Inside Bitcoin’s Energy Use
Bitcoin depends on mining, a process that uses powerful computers to verify transactions. These machines run continuously and consume large amounts of electricity.
Data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration shows Bitcoin mining used between 67 and 240 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity in 2023, with a midpoint estimate of about 120 TWh.

Other estimates place consumption closer to 170 TWh per year in 2025. This accounts for roughly 0.5% of global electricity demand. Recently, as of February 2026, estimates see Bitcoin’s energy use reaching over 200 TWh per year.
That level of energy use is significant. Global electricity demand reached about 27,400 TWh in 2023. Bitcoin’s share may seem small, but it is comparable to the power use of mid-sized countries.
The network also requires steady power. Estimates suggest it draws around 10 gigawatts continuously, similar to several large power plants operating at full capacity. This constant demand makes energy costs central to Bitcoin’s economics.
When Oil Rises, Bitcoin Falls
Bitcoin mining is highly sensitive to electricity prices. Energy is the highest operating cost for miners. When power becomes more expensive, profit margins shrink.
Recent market movements show this link clearly. As oil prices rise and inflation concerns persist, energy costs have increased. At the same time, Bitcoin prices have weakened, falling below the $70,000 level.

This is not a coincidence. Studies show a direct relationship between Bitcoin prices, mining activity, and electricity use. When Bitcoin prices rise, more miners join the network, increasing energy demand. When energy costs rise, less efficient miners may shut down, reducing activity and adding selling pressure.
This creates a feedback loop between crypto and energy markets. Bitcoin is no longer driven only by demand and speculation. It is now influenced by the same forces that affect oil, gas, and power prices.
Cleaner Energy Use Is Growing, but Fossil Fuels Still Matter
Bitcoin’s environmental impact depends on its energy mix. This mix is improving, but it remains uneven.
A 2025 study from the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance found that 52.4% of Bitcoin mining now uses sustainable energy. This includes both renewable sources (42.6%) and nuclear power (9.8%). The share has risen significantly from about 37.6% in 2022.
Despite this progress, fossil fuels still account for a large portion of mining energy. Natural gas alone makes up about 38.2%, while coal continues to contribute a smaller share.

This reliance on fossil fuels keeps emissions high. Current estimates suggest Bitcoin produces more than 114 million tons of carbon dioxide each year. That puts it in line with emissions from some industrial sectors.
The shift toward cleaner energy is real, but it is not complete. The pace of change will play a key role in how Bitcoin fits into global climate goals.
Bitcoin’s Climate Debate Intensifies
Bitcoin’s growing energy demand has placed it at the center of ESG discussions. Its impact is often measured through three key areas:
- Total electricity use, which rivals that of entire countries.
- Carbon emissions are estimated at over 100 million tons of CO₂ annually.
- Energy intensity, with a single transaction using large amounts of power.

At the same time, the industry is evolving. Mining companies are adopting more efficient hardware and exploring new energy sources. Some operations use excess renewable power or capture waste energy, such as flare gas from oil fields.
These efforts show progress, but they do not fully address the concerns. The gap between Bitcoin’s energy use and its environmental impact remains a key issue for investors and regulators.
- MUST READ: Bitcoin Price Hits All-Time High Above $126K: ETFs, Market Drivers, and the Future of Digital Gold
Bitcoin Is Becoming Part of the Energy System
Bitcoin mining is now closely integrated with the broader energy system. Operators often choose locations based on access to cheap or excess electricity. This includes areas with strong renewable generation or underused energy resources.
This integration creates both opportunities and challenges. On one hand, mining can support energy systems by using power that might otherwise go to waste. It can also provide flexible demand that helps stabilize grids.
On the other hand, it can increase pressure on local electricity supplies and extend the use of fossil fuels if cleaner options are not available.
In the United States, Bitcoin mining could account for up to 2.3% of total electricity demand in certain scenarios. This highlights how quickly the sector is scaling and how closely it is tied to national energy systems.
Energy Markets Are Now Key to Bitcoin’s Future
Looking ahead, the connection between Bitcoin and energy is expected to grow stronger. The network’s computing power, or hash rate, continues to reach new highs, which typically leads to higher energy use.
Electricity will remain the main cost for miners. This means Bitcoin will continue to respond to changes in energy prices and supply conditions. At the same time, governments are starting to pay closer attention to crypto’s environmental impact, which could shape future regulations.

Some forecasts suggest Bitcoin’s energy use could rise sharply if adoption increases, potentially reaching up to 400 TWh in extreme scenarios. However, cleaner energy systems could reduce the carbon impact over time.
Bitcoin is no longer just a financial asset. It is also a large-scale energy consumer and a growing part of the global power system.
As a result, understanding Bitcoin now requires a broader view. Energy prices, electricity markets, and carbon trends are becoming just as important as market demand and investor sentiment.
The message is clear. As energy markets move, Bitcoin is likely to move with them.
The post Bitcoin Falls as Energy Prices Rise: Why Crypto Is Now an Energy Market Story appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
LEGO’s Virginia Factory Goes Big on Solar as Net-Zero Push Speeds Up
The post LEGO’s Virginia Factory Goes Big on Solar as Net-Zero Push Speeds Up appeared first on Carbon Credits.
-
Greenhouse Gases7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Renewable Energy5 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?








