Rio Tinto has announced it will purchase carbon credits from a newly launched Australian platform, marking a major step in its decarbonization journey. The initiative shows how big companies are using high-integrity carbon markets in their sustainability plans. At the same time, the deal highlights how Australia is positioning itself as a leader in nature-based carbon solutions.
A New Platform for Scalable Carbon Offsets
Meldora, the new platform, just launched with $250 million in funding. This investment comes from the Clean Energy Finance Corporation (CEFC) and Canada’s La Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec (CDPQ).
The platform will produce Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) by investing in sustainable agriculture and reforestation projects on a large scale.
Meldora has acquired 15,000 hectares of farmland in Central Queensland. This land will be the starting point for its operations. The land will support productive farming and “Environmental Plantings.” Here, native trees and plants will be grown and cared for over many years. This dual-use model combines farming with carbon sequestration, creating reliable long-term credits.
Heechung Sung, CEFC’s head of natural capital, remarked:
“It’s a great privilege to again be able to work with La Caisse and GAP to invest in this strategy and alongside Rio Tinto, who have demonstrated with their long-term offtake, a commitment to invest in high-integrity carbon credits.”
Rio Tinto is now the first long-term buyer of carbon credits from Meldora. This gives the Australian mining giant a steady supply of carbon offsets. It also shows their commitment to real, science-based climate solutions.
How Meldora Works: The Power of Soil Carbon Sequestration
Soils hold remarkable potential as a natural climate solution. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization, well-managed soils could sequester up to 2.05 gigatons of CO₂ per year. That’s equal to about 34% of the total greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. Another study estimates that improved cropland practices could remove 0.44 to 0.68 Pg of carbon annually, or roughly 1.6 to 2.5 gigatons of CO₂.
Meldora’s approach centers on integrating agriculture with reforestation. Farmers use their land for food, but they also restore some areas with native trees and plants. These help capture and store carbon dioxide.
The program follows strict rules:
- Trees are maintained for 25 to 100 years, ensuring permanent carbon storage.
- Projects generate ACCUs, the official credits recognized under Australia’s carbon market.
- Native biodiversity is protected, which improves soil health and water retention on farmland.
The CEFC has committed $50 million to the platform, while CDPQ provided the remaining $200 million. They aim to expand projects across Australia. Their goal is to provide credits that meet the rising demand from companies needing high-quality offsets.
This model also addresses a common challenge in carbon markets: the need to balance credibility with scalability. Meldora aims to combine farming and forestry. This way, carbon projects can be practical for landowners and reliable for buyers like Rio Tinto.
Rio Tinto’s Climate Strategy
Rio Tinto has set bold decarbonization goals using operational changes and carbon offsets to achieve them. The company aims to reduce its Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by 50% by 2030 and achieve net zero by 2050.

- Investing in renewable energy to power its mining operations, such as solar and wind projects in Australia.
- Partnering with technology developers to explore low-carbon steelmaking.
- Purchasing high-quality carbon offsets is necessary when direct emissions reductions are not yet possible.
Rio Tinto is a key investor in the Silva Fund, which backs nature-based carbon projects. It also owns a 14.15% stake in AiCarbon, an Australian carbon farming company. These investments show how the company is building a portfolio of long-term carbon solutions.
By buying credits from Meldora, Rio Tinto boosts its supply of reliable offsets. Global demand for these credits is rising, but supply is still low.
Integrity First: The Value of Verified Carbon Credits
One of the biggest challenges in carbon markets is the issue of integrity. Many credits on the voluntary market have faced criticism for overstating their environmental benefits. Rio Tinto’s CEO has publicly noted that up to 80% of credits reviewed in the U.S. did not meet the company’s internal standards.
Meldora wants to tackle these issues. They ensure projects are checked by independent parties. This way, they aim for lasting environmental benefits. Under Australia’s carbon market rules, ACCUs must meet strict standards and are subject to government oversight.
For Rio Tinto, the assurance of high-integrity carbon credits is key. As pressure mounts from regulators, investors, and the public, companies need offsets. These should balance emissions on paper and provide real benefits for the climate and local communities.
Australia’s Carbon Market Moment
Australia ranks among the top global issuers of carbon credits. Initiatives like Meldora will likely boost this standing. The country has a unique advantage in nature-based carbon projects. Its vast land resources allow for a mix of environmental restoration and agricultural productivity.
The Australian government is tightening climate rules. Under the Safeguard Mechanism, large emitters must cut their emissions every year. For many companies, purchasing ACCUs is one of the most practical ways to comply with these regulations.
Per S&P Global analysis, Australia’s carbon credit demand will surpass issuances in 2028, as seen in the chart.

Platforms like Meldora could therefore play a dual role: supporting corporate net zero strategies and helping Australia meet its national climate targets.
Outlook: Scaling Nature-Based Climate Solutions
The Rio Tinto–Meldora agreement shows how companies are shifting to long-term carbon solutions. They are focusing more on scalability instead of just quick offsets. This change shows a bigger trend in corporate climate action. Nature-based projects are now valued more for their lasting impact and benefits to communities.
For Rio Tinto, the deal ensures access to a reliable stream of credits as it works toward its 2030 and 2050 goals. For Australia, it shows how it can use its land and farming resources to help the world move toward net zero.
By supporting projects that merge agriculture with long-term forest restoration, Rio Tinto is helping to advance a model that could benefit businesses, landowners, and the environment. As Australia grows its carbon credit market, platforms like Meldora could be key. They help connect corporate demand with the urgent need for real, verifiable climate solutions.
The post Rio Tinto Backs $250M Meldora Platform in Push for High-Integrity Carbon Credits appeared first on Carbon Credits.
Carbon Footprint
Finding Nature Based Solutions in Your Supply Chain
Carbon Footprint
How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living
Americans are paying more for insurance, electricity, taxes, and home repairs every year. What many people may not realize is that climate change is already one of the drivers behind those rising costs.
For many households, climate change is no longer just an environmental issue. It is becoming a cost-of-living issue. While climate impacts like melting glaciers and shrinking polar ice can feel distant from everyday life, the financial effects are already showing up in monthly budgets across the country.
Today, a larger share of household income is consumed by fixed costs such as housing, insurance, utilities, and healthcare. (3) Climate change and climate inaction are adding pressure to many of those expenses through higher disaster recovery costs, rising energy demand, infrastructure repairs, and increased insurance risk.
The goal of this article is to help connect climate change to the everyday financial realities people already experience. Regardless of where someone stands on climate policy, it is important to recognize that climate change is already increasing costs for households, businesses, and taxpayers across the United States.
More conservative estimates indicate that the average household has experienced an increase of about $400 per year from observed climate change, while less conservative estimates suggest an increase of $900.(1) Those in more disaster-prone regions of the country face disproportionate costs, with some households experiencing climate-related costs averaging $1,300 per year.(1) Another study found that climate adaptation costs driven by climate change have already consumed over 3% of personal income in the U.S. since 2015.(9) By the end of the century, housing units could spend an additional $5,600 on adaptation costs.(1)
Whether we realize it or not, Americans are already paying for climate change through higher insurance premiums, energy costs, taxes, and infrastructure repairs. These growing expenses are often referred to as climate adaptation costs.
Without meaningful climate action, these costs are expected to continue rising. Choosing not to invest in climate action is also choosing to spend more on climate adaptation.
Here are a few ways climate change is already increasing the cost of living:
- Higher insurance costs from more frequent and severe storms
- Higher energy use during longer and hotter summers
- Higher electricity rates tied to storm recovery and grid upgrades
- Higher government spending and taxpayer-funded disaster recovery costs
The real debate is not whether climate change costs money. Americans are already paying for it. The question is where we want those costs to go. Should we invest more in climate action to help reduce future climate adaptation costs, or continue paying growing recovery and adaptation expenses in everyday life?
How Climate Change Is Increasing Insurance Costs
There is one industry that closely tracks the financial impact of natural disasters: insurance. Insurance companies are focused on assessing risk, estimating damages, and collecting enough revenue to cover losses and remain financially stable.
Comparing the 20-year periods 1980–1999 and 2000–2019, climate-related disasters increased 83% globally from 3,656 events to 6,681 events. The average time between billion-dollar disasters dropped from 82 days during the 1980s to 16 days during the last 10 years, and in 2025 the average time between disasters fell to just 10 days. (6)
According to the reinsurance firm Munich Re, total economic losses from natural disasters in 2024 exceeded $320 billion globally, nearly 40% higher than the decade-long annual average. Average annual inflation-adjusted costs more than quadrupled from $22.6 billion per year in the 1980s to $102 billion per year in the 2010s. Costs increased further to an average of $153.2 billion annually during 2020–2024, representing another 50% increase over the 2010s. (6)
In the United States, billion-dollar weather and climate disasters have also increased significantly. The average number of billion-dollar disasters per year has grown from roughly three annually during the 1980s to 19 annually over the last decade. In 2023 and 2024, the U.S. recorded 28 and 27 billion-dollar disasters respectively, both setting new records. (6)
The growing impact of climate change is one reason insurance costs continue to rise. “There are two things that drive insurance loss costs, which is the frequency of events and how much they cost,” said Robert Passmore, assistant vice president of personal lines at the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America. “So, as these events become more frequent, that’s definitely going to have an impact.” (8)
After adjusting for inflation, insurance costs have steadily increased over time. From 2000 to 2020, insurance costs consistently grew faster than the Consumer Price Index due to rising rebuilding costs and weather-related losses.(3) Between 2020 and 2023 alone, the average home insurance premium increased from $75 to $360 due to climate change impacts, with disaster-prone regions experiencing especially steep increases.(1) Since 2015, homeowners in some regions affected by more extreme weather have seen home insurance costs increased by nearly 57%.(1) Some insurers have also limited or stopped offering coverage in high-risk areas.(7)
For many families, rising insurance costs are no longer occasional financial burdens. They are becoming recurring monthly expenses tied directly to growing climate risk.
How Rising Temperatures Increase Household Energy Costs

The financial impacts of climate change extend beyond insurance. Rising temperatures are also changing how much energy Americans use and how utilities plan for future electricity demand.
Between 1950 and 2010, per capita electricity use increased 10-fold, though usage has flattened or slightly declined since 2012 due to more efficient appliances and LED lighting. (3) A significant share of increased energy demand comes from cooling needs associated with higher temperatures.
Over the last 20 years, the United States has experienced increasing Cooling Degree Days (CDD) and decreasing Heating Degree Days (HDD). Nearly all counties have become warmer over the past three decades, with some areas experiencing several hundred additional cooling degree days, equivalent to roughly one additional degree of warmth on most days. (1) This trend reflects a warming climate where air conditioning demand is increasing while heating demand generally declines. (4)
As temperatures continue rising, households are expected to spend more on cooling than they save on heating. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects that by 2050, national Heating Degree Days will be 11% lower while Cooling Degree Days will be 28% higher than 2021 levels. Cooling demand is projected to rise 2.5 times faster than heating demand declines. (5)
These projections come from energy and infrastructure experts planning for future electricity demand and grid capacity needs. Utilities and grid operators are already preparing for higher peak summer electricity loads caused by rising temperatures. (5)
Longer and hotter summers also affect how homes and buildings are designed. Buildings constructed for past climate conditions may require upgrades such as larger air conditioning systems, stronger insulation, and improved ventilation to remain comfortable and energy efficient in the future. (10)
For many households, this means higher monthly utility bills and potentially higher long-term home improvement costs as temperatures continue to rise.
How Climate Change Affects Electricity Rates
On an inflation-adjusted basis, average U.S. residential electricity rates are slightly lower today than they were 50 years ago. (2) However, climate-related damage to utility infrastructure is creating new upward pressure on electricity costs.
Electric utilities rely heavily on above-ground poles, wires, transformers, and substations that can be damaged by hurricanes, storms, floods, and wildfires. Repairing and upgrading this infrastructure often requires substantial investment.
As a result, utilities are increasing electricity rates in response to wildfire and hurricane events to fund infrastructure repairs and future mitigation efforts. (1) The average cumulative increase in per-household electricity expenditures due to climate-related price changes is approximately $30. (1)
While this increase may appear modest today, utility costs are expected to rise further as climate-related infrastructure damage becomes more frequent and severe.
How Climate Disasters Increase Government Spending and Taxes
Extreme weather events also damage public infrastructure, including roads, schools, bridges, airports, water systems, and emergency services infrastructure. Recovery and rebuilding costs are often funded through taxpayer dollars at the federal, state, and local levels.
The average annual government cost tied to climate-related disaster recovery is estimated at nearly $142 per household. (1) States that frequently experience hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, or flooding can face even higher public recovery costs.
These expenses affect taxpayers whether they personally experience a disaster or not. Climate-related recovery spending can increase pressure on public budgets, emergency management systems, and infrastructure funding nationwide.
Reducing Climate Costs Through Climate Action
While this article focuses on the growing financial costs associated with climate change, the issue is not only about money for many people. It is also about recognizing our environmental impact and taking responsibility for reducing it in order to help preserve a healthy planet for future generations.
While individuals alone cannot solve climate change, collective action can help reduce future climate adaptation costs over time.
For those interested in taking action, there are three important steps:
- Estimate your carbon footprint to better understand the emissions connected to your lifestyle and activities.
- Create a plan to gradually reduce emissions through energy efficiency, cleaner technologies, and more sustainable choices.
- Address remaining emissions by supporting verified carbon reduction projects through carbon credits.
Carbon credits are one of the most cost-effective tools available for climate action because they help fund projects that generate verified emission reductions at scale. Supporting global emission reduction efforts can help reduce the long-term impacts and costs associated with climate change.
Visit Terrapass to learn more about carbon footprints, carbon credits, and climate action solutions.
The post How Climate Change Is Raising the Cost of Living appeared first on Terrapass.
Carbon Footprint
Carbon credit project stewardship: what happens after credit issuance
A carbon credit purchase is not a transaction that closes at issuance. The credit may be retired, the certificate filed, and the reporting box ticked. But on the ground, in the forest, in the field, and in the community, the work continues. It endures for years. In many cases, for decades.
![]()
-
Climate Change10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases10 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Renewable Energy7 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Greenhouse Gases11 months ago
嘉宾来稿:探究火山喷发如何影响气候预测


