
Despite the need for more regional transmission capacity in the Southeast, our region’s utilities have resisted building new lines.
It’s been almost nine months since the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued Order 1920 to improve transmission planning across the country. The benefits of improved transmission are numerous: as SACE wrote when the rule was issued last May, they include lower energy costs, fewer power outages, and more clean energy.
These benefits offer solutions to problems that the Southeast has experienced acutely in the past nine months. Our region has been hit hard by two hurricanes exacerbated by climate change, which knocked out power for millions of customers, with the unluckiest waiting weeks before getting theirs restored. Meanwhile, electricity demand is soaring thanks to population growth in the Southeast coinciding with extreme weather. TVA set a record for electricity load on January 22. This trend will grow even more pronounced as data centers like the xAI facility in Memphis continue to sprout up.
A Series of Delays
Despite the need for more regional transmission capacity, our region’s utilities have resisted building new lines, and there is no regional authority to require them to do so in the Southeast. While other parts of the country have interstate regulators known as regional transmission organizations (RTOs), the Southeast has no such entity. Instead, we have the Southeastern Regional Transmission Planning Group (SERTP), a collection of regional utilities with no regulatory staff or responsibilities.
So far, SERTP’s response to Order 1920 has been to offer reasons why it should not yet come into effect. The rule provided utilities with about one year to comply, but SERTP has made it clear that they don’t think that year is sufficient. Throughout three public meetings since last May, SERTP has offered no details about its compliance plans and has now filed for an extension.
Order 1920 includes a provision to extend its deadline by six months if utilities can show good cause, but SERTP is asking for an even longer extension—a full year beyond the original deadline.
What Will SERTP Do With Its Time?
At last month’s “stakeholder engagement meeting,” SERTP invited interested parties to offer ideas and concerns about the best ways to reimagine transmission planning for our region. Regional clean energy advocates, including SACE, provided hours of feedback and ideas, including an overview of the basics of good transmission planning – a subject that has been studied extensively – and detailed suggestions based on the planning in other parts of the country. Some stakeholders even made procedural suggestions, indicating how SERTP could devise its compliance strategy within the original timeframe set by FERC.
It remains to be seen which of these suggestions SERTP might follow. And with the original Order 1920 deadline approaching around three months from now, it is increasingly likely that the deadline will be nearly upon us by the time we find out. Does SERTP have a working transmission plan that they haven’t shared yet? What will they do if their request for an extension is denied? If their request is approved, when might we begin to see badly needed electricity lines bringing clean, low-cost energy into millions of homes? At the moment, we have no way to know.
The Cost of Waiting
While all this bureaucratic maneuvering continues, energy customers throughout the Southeast will be the ones dealing with the cost of delays. That cost could come in many forms: rolling blackouts like the ones during Winter Storm Elliott, skyrocketing electricity bills, especially during the summer heat, or any number of unpredictable outcomes from hurricanes and other extreme weather events.
Regulators, customers, and everyone in the region need to know that they’re paying the cost. We have a long way to go to modernize and repair our transmission system, and we can’t wait any longer to get started.
The post FERC Order 1920 Warns the Southeastern Power Grid is Failing. Utilities Are Avoiding Upgrades as Long as Possible. appeared first on SACE | Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.
Renewable Energy
ACORE Statement on Treasury’s Safe Harbor Guidance
ACORE Statement on Treasury’s Safe Harbor Guidance
Statement from American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE) President and CEO Ray Long on Treasury’s Safe Harbor Guidance:
“The American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE) is deeply concerned that today’s Treasury guidance on the long-standing ‘beginning of construction’ safe harbor significantly undermines its proven effectiveness, is inconsistent with the law, and creates unnecessary uncertainty for renewable energy development in the United States.
“For over a decade, the safe harbor provisions have served as clear, accountable rules of the road – helping to reduce compliance burdens, foster private investment, and ensure taxpayer protections. These guardrails have been integral to delivering affordable, reliable American clean energy while maintaining transparency and adherence to the rule of law. This was recognized in the One Big Beautiful Act, which codified the safe harbor rules, now changed by this action.
“We need to build more power generation now, and that includes renewable energy. The U.S. will need roughly 118 gigawatts (the equivalent of 12 New York Cities) of new power generation in the next four years to prevent price spikes and potential shortages. Only a limited set of technologies – solar, wind, batteries, and some natural gas – can be built at that scale in that timeframe.”
###
ABOUT ACORE
For over 20 years, the American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE) has been the nation’s leading voice on the issues most essential to clean energy expansion. ACORE unites finance, policy, and technology to accelerate the transition to a clean energy economy. For more information, please visit http://www.acore.org.
Media Contacts:
Stephanie Genco
Senior Vice President, Communications
American Council on Renewable Energy
genco@acore.org
The post ACORE Statement on Treasury’s Safe Harbor Guidance appeared first on ACORE.
https://acore.org/news/acore-statement-on-treasurys-safe-harbor-guidance/
Renewable Energy
Should I Get a Solar Battery Storage System?
Renewable Energy
Wine Grapes and Climate Change
I just spoke with a guy in the wine industry, and I asked him how, if at all, climate change is affecting what we does.
From his perspective, it’s the horrific wildfires whose smoke imbues (or “taints”) the grapes with an unpleasant flavor that needs to be modified, normally by creative methods of blending.
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Spanish-language misinformation on renewable energy spreads online, report shows
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Greenhouse Gases1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change1 year ago
嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Carbon Footprint1 year ago
US SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Why airlines are perfect targets for anti-greenwashing legal action
-
Renewable Energy2 months ago
US Grid Strain, Possible Allete Sale
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Some firms unaware of England’s new single-use plastic ban