Connect with us

Published

on

African leaders at a regional energy summit in Tanzania this week called for more investment in aging grid infrastructure in their countries to tackle widespread power outages that hamper major economies including Nigeria and South Africa, and to expand modern energy access to half of the 600 million people who lack it on the continent.

The conference was organised by Mission 300, an initiative launched in April 2024 by the African Development Bank and the World Bank to provide 300 million energy-poor Africans with electricity by 2030. This will be done mainly by connecting them to national grids or local minigrids powered by renewables such as solar. 

The development banks have committed to collectively deliver $40 billion under the initiative – a target that was raised this week to more than $50 billion by contributions from other financial institutions, including the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) with around $1.5 billion and the Islamic Development Bank Group with $2.65 billion. 

To meet the Mission 300 goals, a first batch of 12 countries – Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Tanzania and Zambia – presented national energy compacts with detailed targets to scale up electricity access through renewable energy, as well as strategies to boost regional integration and attract private sector investment.

Presenting their plans, African leaders spoke of how outdated infrastructure has limited energy expansion on the continent and held back development in areas like healthcare, education, job creation and digital inclusion.

President Hakainde Hichilema of Zambia said African countries “need energy to develop our economies faster,” adding that “energy is lifeas is water”- and energy is essential to extract water for human consumption, agriculture and industry, and keep people healthy.

He pointed to the need for a diversified energy mix coming from different sources including solar, hydro and geothermal, and emphasised that the power they generate must also be transmitted. “We need to take it where it’s needed,” he said.

Other countries echoed a similar concern in their energy compacts. Nigeria’s plan, for instance, stated that “the ability of the transmission system to evacuate available generation capacity is inadequate due to aging and poorly maintained infrastructure”. It called for “targeted concessionary lending to qualifying distribution companies (DISCOs) to strengthen distribution infrastructure”.

Tanzania also mentioned in its compact that the country’s electricity connections are faced with the challenge of “poor reliability and quality of service, caused by a deteriorating network with overloaded transformers [and] distribution feeders”. It called for improvements in the quality of the electricity service that “require investments in grid stabilization, network rehabilitation, reinforcement, and upgrades”.

African leaders at the Mission 300 energy summit (Photo: AfDB)

Makhtar Diop, managing director of the International Finance Corporation (IFC), noted that “a lot of the power outages in Africa are not linked often to production – they are often linked to distribution because the [electricity] network is not robust enough” and called for investments in distribution.

The companies managing distribution require capital injections because most are “under-capitalised and not in a good finance situation and therefore not able to invest in operational maintenance”, he added.

Meanwhile, the progress of some countries like Uganda shows that grid improvement and extension to improve distribution is achievable. With World Bank support, the country extended its grid and installed solar energy in health centres and water supply schemes, directly benefiting almost 8.8 million people in rural areas between 2016 and 2023. It has now embarked on another such project, involving the private sector.

Off-grid ‘cheaper and faster’

Off-grid electrification is also seen as key to the Mission 300 objective – and the energy compacts presented in Dar es Salaam reflected how, in the face of delays to grid extensions, distributed renewable energy (DRE) offers a faster means to electrify under-served communities. 

Half of the Mission 300 goal is due to be achieved by off-grid connections. World Bank President Ajay Banga said geo-spatial mapping was being used within countries to decide which areas can be connected to the grid and which require DRE, including solar and battery storage systems that are “cheaper and faster” to install.

Coal-reliant South African provinces falling behind on just transition

Woochong Um, CEO of the Global Energy Alliance for People and Plant (GEAPP), said this group of government agencies, development banks and philanthropic foundations, is looking to support “hard-to-reach activities, like the productive use of the electrons by the farmers and people on the ground”. GEAPP is planning to pilot promising models that can be scaled up by banks if they produce successful results, he told Climate Home.

Sarah Malm, executive director of GOGLA, a global association for the off-grid solar industry, said off-grid systems “will complement weak grid environments” as the “least-cost and the fastest way to get basic energy access to households”, especially in rural communities. 

“It provides light to study. It provides safety. It provides the ability for a kiosk to stay open at night. It provides really huge quality of life improvements – and then also, when light is intermittent and the grid doesn’t work, it is a source of back-up,” she said.

From 2020 to 2022, off-grid solar accounted for 55% of new connections in sub-Saharan Africa, according to the World Bank, and is projected to provide electricity access to nearly 400 million people by 2030.

Malm believes that off-grid solar is the best way to achieve the global goal of providing everybody with modern, sustainable power by 2030, because extending power grids is a long-term investment and progresses more slowly.

Private-sector investment

African leaders and energy backers at the summit highlighted the role of private-sector investment in fulfilling the goals of Mission 300. 

“To actually achieve what we want to do, it requires more than public-sector money, it requires a lot of private sector,” said Akinwumi Adesina, president of the African Development Bank Group. He added that the private sector will play a role in delivering mini-grids and providing electricity to under-served areas.

Indonesia’s next priority should be finding alternatives to replace coal

The cost of capital, however, is one of the major challenges facing businesses in Africa. Mission 300’s partners will “play a big role to reduce the risk using partial risk and credit guarantees” and provide long-term, low-interest capital, as well as develop bankable projects to attract private investors, Adesina said. 

Um told Climate Home that GEAPP will work with multilateral development banks to help governments set up regulatory frameworks that can reassure the private sector their investments in African countries are safe. 

Diop of IFC said the private sector is not yet as involved as it should be in financing clean energy development in Africa and this has constrained the uptake of renewable energy. He called for a “change in the paradigm” to catalyse heavy investment in renewables. 

(Reporting by Vivian Chime; editing by Megan Rowling)

The post African leaders seek investments in ailing grid infrastructure to achieve energy goals appeared first on Climate Home News.

African leaders seek investments in ailing grid infrastructure to achieve energy goals

Continue Reading

Climate Change

A Tiny Caribbean Island Sued the Netherlands Over Climate Change, and Won

Published

on

The case shows that climate change is a fundamental human rights violation—and the victory of Bonaire, a Dutch territory, could open the door for similar lawsuits globally.

From our collaborating partner Living on Earth, public radio’s environmental news magazine, an interview by Paloma Beltran with Greenpeace Netherlands campaigner Eefje de Kroon.

A Tiny Caribbean Island Sued the Netherlands Over Climate Change, and Won

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Greenpeace organisations to appeal USD $345 million court judgment in Energy Transfer’s intimidation lawsuit

Published

on

SYDNEY, Saturday 28 February 2026 — Greenpeace International and Greenpeace organisations in the US announce they will seek a new trial and, if necessary, appeal the decision with the North Dakota Supreme Court following a North Dakota District Court judgment today awarding Energy Transfer (ET) USD $345 million. 

ET’s SLAPP suit remains a blatant attempt to silence free speech, erase Indigenous leadership of the Standing Rock movement, and punish solidarity with peaceful resistance to the Dakota Access Pipeline. Greenpeace International will also continue to seek damages for ET’s bullying lawsuits under EU anti-SLAPP legislation in the Netherlands.

Mads Christensen, Greenpeace International Executive Director said: “Energy Transfer’s attempts to silence us are failing. Greenpeace International will continue to resist intimidation tactics. We will not be silenced. We will only get louder, joining our voices to those of our allies all around the world against the corporate polluters and billionaire oligarchs who prioritise profits over people and the planet.

“With hard-won freedoms under threat and the climate crisis accelerating, the stakes of this legal fight couldn’t be higher. Through appeals in the US and Greenpeace International’s groundbreaking anti-SLAPP case in the Netherlands, we are exploring every option to hold Energy Transfer accountable for multiple abusive lawsuits and show all power-hungry bullies that their attacks will only result in a stronger people-powered movement.”

The Court’s final judgment today rejects some of the jury verdict delivered in March 2025, but still awards hundreds of millions of dollars to ET without a sound basis in law. The Greenpeace defendants will continue to press their arguments that the US Constitution does not allow liability here, that ET did not present evidence to support its claims, that the Court admitted inflammatory and irrelevant evidence at trial and excluded other evidence supporting the defense, and that the jury pool in Mandan could not be impartial.[1][2]

ET’s back-to-back lawsuits against Greenpeace International and the US organisations Greenpeace USA (Greenpeace Inc.) and Greenpeace Fund are clear-cut examples of SLAPPs — lawsuits attempting to bury nonprofits and activists in legal fees, push them towards bankruptcy and ultimately silence dissent.[3] Greenpeace International, which is based in the Netherlands, is pursuing justice in Europe, with a suit against ET under Dutch law and the European Union’s new anti-SLAPP directive, a landmark test of the new legislation which could help set a powerful precedent against corporate bullying.[4]

Kate Smolski, Program Director at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: “This is part of a worrying trend globally: fossil fuel corporations are increasingly using litigation to attack and silence ordinary people and groups using the law to challenge their polluting operations — and we’re not immune to these tactics here in Australia.

“Rulings like this have a chilling effect on democracy and public interest litigation — we must unite against these silencing tactics as bad for Australians and bad for our democracy. Our movement is stronger than any corporate bully, and grows even stronger when under attack.”

Energy Transfer’s SLAPPs are part of a wave of abusive lawsuits filed by Big Oil companies like Shell, Total, and ENI against Greenpeace entities in recent years.[3] A couple of these cases have been successfully stopped in their tracks. This includes Greenpeace France successfully defeating TotalEnergies’ SLAPP on 28 March 2024, and Greenpeace UK and Greenpeace International forcing Shell to back down from its SLAPP on 10 December 2024.

-ENDS-

Images available in Greenpeace Media Library

Notes:

[1] The judgment entered by North Dakota District Court Judge Gion follows a jury verdict finding Greenpeace entities liable for more than US$660 million on March 19, 2025. Judge Gion subsequently threw out several items from the jury’s verdict, reducing the total damages to approximately US$345 million.

[2] Public statements from the independent Trial Monitoring Committee

[3] Energy Transfer’s first lawsuit was filed in federal court in 2017 under the RICO Act – the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, a US federal statute designed to prosecute mob activity. The case was dismissed in 2019, with the judge stating the evidence fell “far short” of what was needed to establish a RICO enterprise. The federal court did not decide on Energy Transfer’s claims based on state law, so Energy Transfer promptly filed a new case in a North Dakota state court with these and other state law claims.

[4] Greenpeace International sent a Notice of Liability to Energy Transfer on 23 July 2024, informing the pipeline giant of Greenpeace International’s intention to bring an anti-SLAPP lawsuit against the company in a Dutch Court. After Energy Transfer declined to accept liability on multiple occasions (September 2024, December 2024), Greenpeace International initiated the first test of the European Union’s anti-SLAPP Directive on 11 February 2025 by filing a lawsuit in Dutch court against Energy Transfer. The case was officially registered in the docket of the Court of Amsterdam on 2 July, 2025. Greenpeace International seeks to recover all damages and costs it has suffered as a result of Energy Transfers’s back-to-back, abusive lawsuits demanding hundreds of millions of dollars from Greenpeace International and the Greenpeace organisations in the US. The next hearing in the Court of Amsterdam is scheduled for 16 April, 2026.

Media contact:

Kate O’Callaghan on 0406 231 892 or kate.ocallaghan@greenpeace.org

Greenpeace organisations to appeal USD $345 million court judgment in Energy Transfer’s intimidation lawsuit

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Former EPA Staff Detail Expanding Pollution Risks Under Trump

Published

on

The Trump administration’s relentless rollback of public health and environmental protections has allowed widespread toxic exposures to flourish, warn experts who helped implement safeguards now under assault.

In a new report that outlines a dozen high-risk pollutants given new life thanks to weakened, delayed or rescinded regulations, the Environmental Protection Network, a nonprofit, nonpartisan group of hundreds of former Environmental Protection Agency staff, warns that the EPA under President Donald Trump has abandoned the agency’s core mission of protecting people and the environment from preventable toxic exposures.

Former EPA Staff Detail Expanding Pollution Risks Under Trump

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com