Ahead of the Paris Olympic Games this summer, the organising committee was concerned about two principal diseases: Covid, which Europe is fully familiar with, and dengue fever.
Dengue, a climate-sensitive infectious disease spread by mosquitoes, is traditionally considered a “tropical” infectious disease.
But authorities closely monitored and prepared for dengue in Paris due to its potential to spread in the increasingly warm climate of the region.
A great deal of progress has been made over recent decades in the fight against some infectious diseases, such as malaria, yet this progress is at risk due to climate change.
Mosquitoes carrying the dengue virus are now a threat in France and other European countries because of warmer summers.
Extreme weather events and warming temperatures are giving many infectious diseases opportunities to expand to new regions, putting billions of people at risk.
Climate-sensitive infectious diseases
Any infectious disease whose transmission and spread are influenced by changes and variations in climate and weather is considered a climate-sensitive infectious disease (CSID).
These include diseases that are spread by air, food, water or vectors.
The CSIDs that have received most media attention are vector-borne. They are caused by pathogens that have been transmitted to a human by a vector, such as a snail, fly, tick or mosquito.
Vector-borne diseases include dengue, Zika virus, malaria, Chikungunya and yellow fever.
Ideal breeding conditions
Almost all vector-borne diseases have a climate dimension. Both pathogens – the microorganisms that cause the disease itself – and vectors are very sensitive and highly responsive to the environments they live in. Changes in temperature and rainfall can have significant impacts on their spread.
In 2024, global temperatures reached record highs. These extreme conditions have been linked to a surge in dengue fever cases worldwide and contributed to the spread of other infectious diseases.
Pathogens and vectors typically thrive in warmer climates – in part because there is a longer season in which the vectors can live, breed and pass on the disease.
Higher temperatures change the behaviour of insect vectors. Adult mosquitoes reproduce more quickly and bite more frequently in warmer weather.
Pathogens also multiply faster within the vector in warmer conditions. This means there is a higher concentration of the disease-causing pathogen transmitted within insect bites, increasing the chance of infection. In turn, this leads to quicker and more intense disease outbreaks.

Temperature is only one part of the picture. Changes in rainfall patterns contribute to creating ideal breeding conditions for mosquitoes and other vectors too.
Pakistan, for example, has had increasingly heavy monsoon seasons – linked to climate change – that result in severe flooding. When the floods recede, stagnant water pools are left creating ideal breeding sites for some mosquitos.
Flooding in 2024 has seen 1.3m cases of malaria recorded in Pakistan so far, with cases likely to continue rising. In 2021, there were 500,000 cases recorded in total.
Unequal risks
Vulnerable populations are typically at greater risk from CSIDs – including children, the elderly, pregnant women and people with weakened immune systems.
Additionally, communities with limited healthcare, inadequate housing and poor sanitation are more susceptible to outbreaks of CSIDs due to reduced capability to prevent, detect and treat infections.
Currently, lower-income countries – particularly those in tropical regions – bear the higher burden of CSIDs. Tropical regions are more exposed to vector-borne diseases for several reasons – from the warm and humid climate and the existence of disease-carrying insects to inadequate housing, infrastructure and healthcare.
This combination of factors leads to heightened risk and less resilience against the spread of such infectious diseases in many tropical countries.
However, as temperatures rise, cooler regions, such as Europe, are also becoming more vulnerable to climate-sensitive diseases.
Warmer temperatures increase the geographic range where vectors – such as mosquitoes and ticks – can survive and breed.
This pattern is exemplified by Lyme disease, an illness transmitted by ticks. Increasingly prevalent throughout the UK, it is also steadily moving into northern areas of Canada and even the Arctic – where it was previously absent as ticks could not survive the cold temperatures.

Due to climate and land-use change, ticks can now spread Lyme disease into these new areas and could lead to year-round tick seasons, which could be expected in areas of Scotland and elsewhere.
Reducing risks
While curbing the spread of CSIDs requires global action to slow climate change, there are adaptation measures that can be put in place now.
These measures are particularly important in lower-income countries, where the impacts of climate change on health are most acutely felt.
Wellcome is funding 24 research teams from both climate and health backgrounds in 12 countries to develop new digital tools to respond to the emerging threat of CSIDs.
Integrating climate data with health information can improve the prediction and management of disease outbreaks to, for example, create better early warning systems.
For example, a research team based in Vietnam is developing a new digital tool called E-DENGUE to predict dengue outbreaks as early as two months in advance. It will be tailored for the Mekong Delta region of Vietnam.
This will allow public health practitioners to be one step ahead of dengue outbreaks, giving them time to mobilise resources and concentrate interventions to the most affected areas.
Reducing the ability of mosquitoes to transmit viruses is another promising approach being used to regain control of CSIDs.
The World Mosquito Program is releasing mosquitoes infected with Wolbachia, an extremely common bacterium that occurs naturally in 50% of insect species. This bacterium was found to reduce the ability of tiger mosquitoes to transmit viruses such as dengue and Zika.
However, extreme heat can reduce the effectiveness of this method, highlighting the need for heat-resistant strains of the Wolbachia bacterium in future control programmes.
Recent advances in vaccine development also offer hope. A vaccine for dengue fever has been approved in several countries and more effective vaccines are under development.
For malaria, the vaccine Mosquirix has been recommended by the World Health Organization for use in moderate- and high-transmission areas, and a second-generation malaria vaccine, known as R21/Matrix-M, has demonstrated high efficacy in trials. This summer, Ivory Coast became the first country to roll out R21/Matrix-M.
These vaccines represent strides forward in preventing these diseases and complement other control measures.
Addressing the most acute problems
Climate change is reshaping the global landscape of infectious diseases, with vector-borne diseases at the forefront of this shift.
As temperatures rise and extreme weather becomes more severe, the risk of disease outbreaks increases – both for regions where a disease is already endemic and for those that are experiencing it anew.
Countries that have made the smallest contribution to greenhouse gas emissions are often the ones most affected by climate change’s health impacts and the least well equipped to deal with them.
Ensuring that these countries have access to tools and resources and the support needed to strengthen their health systems will help stem the spread of CSIDs. But much more will be needed to ensure that they can adapt to and mitigate the wider health effects of climate change.
The post Guest post: The growing threat of climate-sensitive infectious diseases appeared first on Carbon Brief.
Guest post: The growing threat of climate-sensitive infectious diseases
Climate Change
Greenpeace organisations to appeal USD $345 million court judgment in Energy Transfer’s intimidation lawsuit
SYDNEY, Saturday 28 February 2026 — Greenpeace International and Greenpeace organisations in the US announce they will seek a new trial and, if necessary, appeal the decision with the North Dakota Supreme Court following a North Dakota District Court judgment today awarding Energy Transfer (ET) USD $345 million.

ET’s SLAPP suit remains a blatant attempt to silence free speech, erase Indigenous leadership of the Standing Rock movement, and punish solidarity with peaceful resistance to the Dakota Access Pipeline. Greenpeace International will also continue to seek damages for ET’s bullying lawsuits under EU anti-SLAPP legislation in the Netherlands.
Mads Christensen, Greenpeace International Executive Director said: “Energy Transfer’s attempts to silence us are failing. Greenpeace International will continue to resist intimidation tactics. We will not be silenced. We will only get louder, joining our voices to those of our allies all around the world against the corporate polluters and billionaire oligarchs who prioritise profits over people and the planet.
“With hard-won freedoms under threat and the climate crisis accelerating, the stakes of this legal fight couldn’t be higher. Through appeals in the US and Greenpeace International’s groundbreaking anti-SLAPP case in the Netherlands, we are exploring every option to hold Energy Transfer accountable for multiple abusive lawsuits and show all power-hungry bullies that their attacks will only result in a stronger people-powered movement.”
The Court’s final judgment today rejects some of the jury verdict delivered in March 2025, but still awards hundreds of millions of dollars to ET without a sound basis in law. The Greenpeace defendants will continue to press their arguments that the US Constitution does not allow liability here, that ET did not present evidence to support its claims, that the Court admitted inflammatory and irrelevant evidence at trial and excluded other evidence supporting the defense, and that the jury pool in Mandan could not be impartial.[1][2]
ET’s back-to-back lawsuits against Greenpeace International and the US organisations Greenpeace USA (Greenpeace Inc.) and Greenpeace Fund are clear-cut examples of SLAPPs — lawsuits attempting to bury nonprofits and activists in legal fees, push them towards bankruptcy and ultimately silence dissent.[3] Greenpeace International, which is based in the Netherlands, is pursuing justice in Europe, with a suit against ET under Dutch law and the European Union’s new anti-SLAPP directive, a landmark test of the new legislation which could help set a powerful precedent against corporate bullying.[4]
Kate Smolski, Program Director at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: “This is part of a worrying trend globally: fossil fuel corporations are increasingly using litigation to attack and silence ordinary people and groups using the law to challenge their polluting operations — and we’re not immune to these tactics here in Australia.
“Rulings like this have a chilling effect on democracy and public interest litigation — we must unite against these silencing tactics as bad for Australians and bad for our democracy. Our movement is stronger than any corporate bully, and grows even stronger when under attack.”
Energy Transfer’s SLAPPs are part of a wave of abusive lawsuits filed by Big Oil companies like Shell, Total, and ENI against Greenpeace entities in recent years.[3] A couple of these cases have been successfully stopped in their tracks. This includes Greenpeace France successfully defeating TotalEnergies’ SLAPP on 28 March 2024, and Greenpeace UK and Greenpeace International forcing Shell to back down from its SLAPP on 10 December 2024.
-ENDS-
Images available in Greenpeace Media Library
Notes:
[1] The judgment entered by North Dakota District Court Judge Gion follows a jury verdict finding Greenpeace entities liable for more than US$660 million on March 19, 2025. Judge Gion subsequently threw out several items from the jury’s verdict, reducing the total damages to approximately US$345 million.
[2] Public statements from the independent Trial Monitoring Committee
[3] Energy Transfer’s first lawsuit was filed in federal court in 2017 under the RICO Act – the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, a US federal statute designed to prosecute mob activity. The case was dismissed in 2019, with the judge stating the evidence fell “far short” of what was needed to establish a RICO enterprise. The federal court did not decide on Energy Transfer’s claims based on state law, so Energy Transfer promptly filed a new case in a North Dakota state court with these and other state law claims.
[4] Greenpeace International sent a Notice of Liability to Energy Transfer on 23 July 2024, informing the pipeline giant of Greenpeace International’s intention to bring an anti-SLAPP lawsuit against the company in a Dutch Court. After Energy Transfer declined to accept liability on multiple occasions (September 2024, December 2024), Greenpeace International initiated the first test of the European Union’s anti-SLAPP Directive on 11 February 2025 by filing a lawsuit in Dutch court against Energy Transfer. The case was officially registered in the docket of the Court of Amsterdam on 2 July, 2025. Greenpeace International seeks to recover all damages and costs it has suffered as a result of Energy Transfers’s back-to-back, abusive lawsuits demanding hundreds of millions of dollars from Greenpeace International and the Greenpeace organisations in the US. The next hearing in the Court of Amsterdam is scheduled for 16 April, 2026.
Media contact:
Kate O’Callaghan on 0406 231 892 or kate.ocallaghan@greenpeace.org
Climate Change
Former EPA Staff Detail Expanding Pollution Risks Under Trump
The Trump administration’s relentless rollback of public health and environmental protections has allowed widespread toxic exposures to flourish, warn experts who helped implement safeguards now under assault.
In a new report that outlines a dozen high-risk pollutants given new life thanks to weakened, delayed or rescinded regulations, the Environmental Protection Network, a nonprofit, nonpartisan group of hundreds of former Environmental Protection Agency staff, warns that the EPA under President Donald Trump has abandoned the agency’s core mission of protecting people and the environment from preventable toxic exposures.
Former EPA Staff Detail Expanding Pollution Risks Under Trump
Climate Change
Cheniere Energy Received $370 Million IRS Windfall for Using LNG as ‘Alternative’ Fuel
The country’s largest exporter of liquefied natural gas benefited from what critics say is a questionable IRS interpretation of tax credits.
Cheniere Energy, the largest producer and exporter of U.S. liquefied natural gas, received $370 million from the IRS in the first quarter of 2026, a payout that shipping experts, tax specialists and a U.S. senator say the company never should have received.
Cheniere Energy Received $370 Million IRS Windfall for Using LNG as ‘Alternative’ Fuel
-
Greenhouse Gases7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Climate Change7 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Spanish-language misinformation on renewable energy spreads online, report shows
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits




