Argentine lawmakers are set to vote this week on government proposals to weaken a landmark law that bans mining on and around glaciers, days after President Javier Milei’s libertarian administration signed a critical minerals supply deal with the US.
Milei will ask Congress to amend 2010 legislation known as the glaciers law – hailed as the first of its kind in the world – which prohibits activities such as mining or oil drilling on the nearly 17,000 glaciers and surrounding periglacial areas that supply water to millions of Argentines and the vital agricultural sector.
While glaciers account for less than 1% of Argentina’s vast territory, they overlap with large mineral deposits, especially copper, a critical mineral which is in hot demand for use in renewable energy systems, power grid infrastructure and batteries for electric vehicles (EVs).
Soaring demand for the red metal is driving a supply shortage that could reach 30% by 2035, according to the International Energy Agency.
Argentina, already a leading global lithium exporter, does not produce copper at present, but several major projects – on hold for years – could go ahead if Milei’s glacier law overhaul is approved by Congress, environmental campaigners and mining advocates say.
The nation’s mining exports reached $6.04 billion in 2025, according to the government.
Mineral-rich provinces would define protected areas
Milei says his bid to amend the glacier law is a way to give greater autonomy to the provinces by allowing them to decide exactly which glacial areas should be protected and off-limits for mining due to their role in water systems, and which should lose that status. Provincial authorities would then be allowed to grant mining permits in periglacial areas.
The amendment comes as part of a wider push by Milei – a close ideological ally of US President Donald Trump – to draw investment to the country, and the legislative overhaul is backed by mining companies and governors in the nation’s biggest mining provinces such as San Juan, Salta, Jujuy and Mendoza.
“This bill we are sending to Congress will bring investments that could create one million jobs,” Milei said of his plan to overhaul the glaciers law in November, adding that “environmentalists would prefer people to die of hunger before touching anything”.
Earlier this month, Milei’s administration signed a critical minerals deal with the US to strengthen and secure supply chains, saying the accord was expected to drive significant economic growth and new investment.
But many environmental scientists in Argentina say the government’s proposal puts business interests before safeguards vital to protecting the nation’s water supplies at a time when climate change is taking a heavy toll on glacial areas.
“There is a clear intention among those pushing for these modifications to portray the current protection of the periglacial environment, or glacial waste rock, as a legal exaggeration, minimising the importance of these areas within the glaciers themselves and the ecosystem services they provide,” Guillermo Folguera, an environmental researcher from Argentina’s National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET), told Climate Home News.
Some mining experts say regulators could protect water supplies by establishing technical criteria – such as the ice content of periglacial areas.
Copper projects on ice – for now
By opening a door to mining on areas that are currently protected, Milei’s plan could clear the way for at least four large copper projects that have been on hold since the glaciers law was passed 15 years ago, said FARN, an Argentine NGO focused on environmental issues and natural resources.
“Today, some projects violate the glaciers law and that, with this regulatory change, could potentially begin operating,” Leandro Gómez, environmental policy coordinator at FARN, told Climate Home News.
Giant copper mining projects that could be revived if the overhaul passes Congress include El Pachón and Agua Rica, both of which are owned by Swiss miner and commodities trader Glencore, according to FARN, which along with 26 other environmental organisations published a document rejecting the government’s proposal.
Last year, Glencore said it planned to spend $4 billion to develop Agua Rica and $9.5 billion to develop El Pachón.
The other two copper projects that FARN says could get the go-ahead if Milei’s amendments are passed are Los Azules and Josemaria in San Juan province.

All four projects are located in areas classified as periglacial zones with rock glaciers, according to surveys by IANIGLIA, the national agency responsible for conducting inventories of such areas.
Asked to comment on its Agua Rica project, now called MARA, Glencore said in a statement the site was not located on a rock glacier.
“There is no rock glacier located in the footprint of the MARA project; neither in any current works nor within the foreseen area of future operations,” it said, adding that water management was a key element of the project’s design.
“We have been developing a system designed to minimise or mitigate impacts on the local communities or the environment,” it said.
Milei is confident of congressional approval
Milei’s La Libertad Avanza party gained ground in Congress following a midterm election in October, and he voiced confidence in January about having enough votes to pass his glacier law proposal.
Last week, José Peluc, a deputy for San Juan from La Libertad Avanza, was designated head of the lower house’s environment commission in a signal of support for the amendment, though some opposition lawmakers have condemned Milei’s plan.
Lawmaker Maximiliano Ferraro from the centrist Civic Coalition told Congress in a recent debate that the proposal “is in clear violation” of the country’s constitution and Latin America’s 2018 Escazu Agreement on environmental rights.
The amendment, like other government measures aimed at boosting big mining projects such as the Large Investment Incentive Regime (RIGI), is supported by the CAEM chamber that groups Argentina’s major mining companies. It has also said the change would help revive deadlocked copper projects.
“Seventy-five percent of the surface area of the copper projects that were announced need clarification of the law because they are in areas considered periglacial,” Roberto Cacciola, CAEM president, told La Nación newspaper.
“Most have already started the application to enter the Large Investment Incentive Regime (RIGI),” he said.
“Irreparable consequences” feared near copper project
In the small town of Andalgalá in Catamarca province, which lies about 17 kilometres from the Agua Rica project, anti-mining activists have been holding weekly marches against the mine’s development since 2010 and they describe heavy-handed police tactics aimed at stifling their protests.
They are dismayed by the government’s attempt to water down the glaciers law, fearing that allowing the mine to operate would endanger the town’s water supplies from the Andalgalá River.
“Starting up Agua Rica would mean large-scale environmental destruction,” said Juan José Cólica, an agricultural engineer who worked for 35 years, until his retirement last year, at the National Institute of Agricultural Technology’s Andalgalá office.
Glencore said it was working to complete the exploitation phase environmental impact report (EIR) for the project, which would be subjected to a technical review by the regulatory authority and public consultation.
“We engage with our host communities to understand and address their concerns, including in respect of economic and social development opportunities for the region,” the company said.
Cólica said allowing the mine to operate at the foot of the snow-capped Aconquija mountain would cause “irreparable consequences that could last for generations”.
“There is no technical method or technology to remedy the damage that could be caused, nor to safeguard the population of Andalgalá from the geological, hydrological, environmental and health risks,” he said.
The post Argentina’s pioneering glacier law on the line as Milei bets on copper rush appeared first on Climate Home News.
Argentina’s pioneering glacier law on the line as Milei bets on copper rush
Climate Change
Corpus Christi Projects Emergency Water Restrictions in September for Large Industrial Users and 500,000 Customers
Even hospitals are drilling wells as the region’s reservoirs reach disastrously low levels and ratings agencies downgrade the city’s outlook.
Without a shift in weather patterns, the City of Corpus Christi expects to enact emergency restrictions on water use in September, according to draft documents slated for release at a City Council meeting on Tuesday morning.
Climate Change
Facing Drought and Low Snowpack, Rio Grande States Expect a “Challenging” Year
Officials at the annual Rio Grande Compact Commission meeting said that they expect river flows this year to be among the lowest in history.
Reporting supported by the Water Desk at the University of Colorado Boulder.
Facing Drought and Low Snowpack, Rio Grande States Expect a “Challenging” Year
Climate Change
New analysis reveals Woodside’s amended Browse plans still too risky for turtles, whales
SYDNEY, Tuesday 21 April 2026 — New analysis of Woodside’s amended turtle and whale management plans for its Browse gas proposal has revealed supposed ‘mitigation methods’ still risk extinction of green turtles, will risk killing endangered whales and will likely accelerate the sinking of the only local turtle nesting ground at Scott Reef.
The independent technical analyses, commissioned by Greenpeace Australia Pacific and prepared by Oceanwise and whale expert Dr. Olaf Meynecke, also reveals Woodside’s plans rely on outdated or misrepresented data, are not in line with requirements under the EPBC Act and directly oppose Australia’s Conservation Management Plan for Blue Whales.
Woodside was forced to resubmit its Turtle Management Plan and Pygmy Blue Whale Management Plan after it was revealed WA’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had issued a preliminary rejection of the Browse project in 2024 due to ‘unacceptable impacts’ on nature at Scott Reef.
Hannah Schuch, senior campaigner at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: “The EPA sent Woodside back to the drawing board for its Browse project because it was too risky for the endemic and endangered animals at Australia’s largest freestanding oceanic reef, Scott Reef.
“This new analysis shows that the ‘revised’ plans should not bring comfort to the EPA, the government or the Australian public, and still threaten to send green turtles extinct, sink a unique turtle nesting ground, and disrupt, injure or even kill endangered pygmy blue whales. Woodside has simply rolled its awful plan in glitter – the Browse plans are still too risky.”
The EPA is expected to hand down its recommendation on the Browse project this year.
Woodside’s planned Browse gas field would entail drilling up to 57 wells as close as two kilometres from Scott Reef, home to nesting sea turtles, endangered pygmy blue whales and dusky sea snakes.
Co-author of the Pygmy Blue Whale Plan analysis, Dr. Olaf Meynecke, said: “Woodside’s Management Plan for Scott Reef falls short of acknowledging the region as a critical habitat for pygmy blue whales. Scott Reef is an anchor point and whale hub for pygmy blue whales. The region provides shelter for mother-calf pairs during their long journeys from Indonesia to Australia and, most importantly, an area where they can feed to replenish nutrients when returning from their tropical breeding grounds.”
Schuch added: “Woodside can’t be trusted with Scott Reef. It was asked to put forward mitigation plans to ‘lower risk on the West Australian environment’, and it has presented a weak, gussied-up version of its original dangerous plans. The impacts on Scott Reef are still unacceptable, and Browse must be rejected.
“Scott Reef will be a major threshold test for this government’s legacy on nature protection–it’s time for Murray Watt to save Australia’s largest oceanic reef, Scott Reef, from Woodside’s massive fossil fuel project in the middle of endangered whale and turtle habitat.”
The analysis comes just days before Woodside is due to face shareholders and concerned community groups at its Annual General Meeting in Perth on Thursday. Each year, hundreds gather to protest Browse during the meeting, citing environmental and climate risks of Browse. This year, community groups, including Greenpeace, are calling on the Federal Government to save Scott Reef by saying no to Woodside’s Browse project.
—ENDS—
Contact: Kimberley Bernard on +61407 581 404 or kbernard@greenpeace.org or Emma Sangalli on +61 431 513 465 or emma.sangalli@greenpeace.org
New analysis reveals Woodside’s amended Browse plans still too risky for turtles, whales
-
Climate Change8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases8 months ago
Guest post: Why China is still building new coal – and when it might stop
-
Greenhouse Gases2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change2 years ago
Bill Discounting Climate Change in Florida’s Energy Policy Awaits DeSantis’ Approval
-
Climate Change2 years ago嘉宾来稿:满足中国增长的用电需求 光伏加储能“比新建煤电更实惠”
-
Climate Change Videos2 years ago
The toxic gas flares fuelling Nigeria’s climate change – BBC News
-
Renewable Energy6 months agoSending Progressive Philanthropist George Soros to Prison?
-
Carbon Footprint2 years agoUS SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rules Spur Renewed Interest in Carbon Credits






