Connect with us

Published

on

Mario Boccucci is head of the UN Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries (UN-REDD).

This year will present us with a unique opportunity to put forests at the forefront of climate implementation. As one of the most effective solutions we have to climate change, forests can be a game-changer, and we should seize the moment to ramp up investments.

Strengthening international cooperation and unlocking finance for forests will enable forest-based mitigation to reach its potential and also make a real difference to the planet’s health and people’s lives.

Forests are more than a network of trees. Covering a third of the world’s land mass, they are vital carbon sinks, helping to avert major climate change impacts. The conditions must be put in place to enable this to continue. Forests also provide food security and sustainable livelihoods for more than 1.6 billion people – from Indigenous Peoples in the Amazon to herders in the Sahel.

Destroying forests also hurts economies. With an estimated economic value of US$150 trillion and contributing directly to the livelihoods of 90 percent of more than 1 billion people living in extreme poverty, forests can support more than 86 million jobs. Investments in forests will create even more jobs and support livelihoods. Furthermore, every $1 spent on forests returns an investment of $9.

UN biodiversity talks agree finance roadmap, postponing decision on a new fund

We have already seen that forest-based mitigation is impactful. Processes like REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) have demonstrated that investing in forests delivers real emissions reductions, strengthens economies, and secures livelihoods.

In Ghana, farmers growing sustainable cocoa earn more while keeping forests intact. In Indonesia, restoring mangroves helps fishing communities thrive while protecting them from storms. Costa Rica and Viet Nam have proven that sustainable forestry and ecotourism can lift people out of poverty and contribute to local economies.

UN-REDD Programme gets results

Globally, over 20 countries have reported a reduction of almost 14 billion tons of carbon dioxide – real progress. The UN-REDD Programme has directly provided support to these countries, mobilizing $1 billion in REDD+ financing since inception, including $350 million in results-based payments, proving that forest protection is practical, effective, and scalable.

Over time, we’ve also seen progress in REDD+ efforts to ensure that everyone – including Indigenous Peoples, local communities, women and youths – have a stake and role in forest protection under more equitable and fair terms. In addition, we have seen improvements in integrity, transparency,  accountability, and carbon monitoring.

At least a quarter of the world’s land area is owned, managed, used or occupied by Indigenous Peoples and local communities, and they must be helped to become effective stewards of forestland. Indigenous Peoples and local communities are our real partners in achieving climate goals and curbing deforestation long-term.

But if we fail to drastically scale-up financing and support for forests, this golden opportunity 2025 presents us with will stall. A UN Environment Programme report published late last year estimated that restoration finance needs to quadruple from 2022 levels of $64 billion to $296 billion by 2030 to reach global restoration targets while contributing to climate and biodiversity goals. Meanwhile, harmful subsidies for industries driving deforestation continue to flow. 

Funding through carbon markets – with improved transparency, human rights protections, and environmental integrity – will be part of broader elements and finance to enable countries to deliver on their specific climate goals and ensure transformational change that limits the risk of reversals, with significant additional benefits. Along with collective action, this will support decarbonization efforts and make a real difference, allowing us to change the course of the next ten years.

COP30 turning point in the Amazon

This year’s COP climate conference will take place at the heart of the Amazon, a region that symbolizes both the promise and peril of our moment. It’s a turning point.

Governments, businesses, financial institutions, and multilateral organizations must scale up forest finance, phase out harmful subsidies, and put forests at the center of climate action, and of economic and security strategies.

“Not silver bullets”: COP30 CEO downplays impact of yearly climate summits

Having worked on forest conservation across the globe for 30 years, it has been a privilege to work alongside so many forest and climate champions – including UN-REDD Programme partners – who have devoted all their time and efforts to protecting forests. We have unprecedented opportunities and challenges ahead of us – and I hope this short reflection is useful to see the forests and the trees.

It is especially relevant on the International Day of Forests, which may enable people new to the forest agenda to understand and engage.

Forest solutions are real and there is evidence they deliver. They provide multiple benefits thanks to a massively growing movement of champions across all stakeholders. REDD+ has been tested and proven to work. We now have a global mechanism for forest and climate action, finance and results that works.

Our collective effort should now focus on massively scaling up implementation and finance.

The post 2025 is the year to invest in forests – and the people who depend on them  appeared first on Climate Home News.

2025 is the year to invest in forests – and the people who depend on them 

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Climate Activists Stage Mock Funeral for Landmark Climate Rule

Published

on

The Trump EPA’s repeal of the 2009 endangerment finding revokes the agency’s authority to regulate climate pollution. Environmental activists are mourning the loss while vowing to resurrect it.

A procession of mourners representing sea level rise, melting permafrost, ecocide and other climate calamities grieved the demise of a groundbreaking climate rule outside the Environmental Protection Agency’s Region 9 headquarters in downtown San Francisco on Tuesday.

Climate Activists Stage Mock Funeral for Landmark Climate Rule

Continue Reading

Climate Change

IEA slashes pre-war oil demand forecast by nearly a million barrels per day

Published

on

Global oil demand is expected to be almost one million barrels per day less than was forecast before the Iran war, as shortages and soaring costs prompt drastic cutbacks by consumers and businesses, a report by the International Energy Agency (IEA) said on Wednesday.

With the closure of the Strait of Hormuz choking off supplies and keeping prices high, less oil is being used to make products such as jet fuel, LPG cooking gas and petrochemicals, the Paris-based IEA said in its monthly oil report, forecasting the biggest quarterly demand drop since the COVID pandemic.

The Iran war “upends our global outlook”, the government-backed agency said, adding that it now expects oil demand to shrink by 80,000 barrels per day in 2026 from last year.

Before the conflict began, the IEA said in February it expected oil demand to rise by 850,000 barrels per day this year, meaning the difference between the pre-war and current estimates is 930,000 barrels a day, or 340 million barrels a year.

That could have a significant impact on the outlook for planet-heating carbon emissions this year.

At an intensity of 434 kg of carbon dioxide per barrel of oil – the estimate used by the US Environmental Protection Agency – the annual reduction in carbon dioxide emissions from oil for 2026, compared with the pre-war forecast, is similar to the amount emitted by the Philippines each year.

Harry Benham, senior advisor at Carbon Tracker, told Climate Home News that he expects at least half of the reduction in oil demand to be permanent because of efficiency gains, behavioural change and faster electrification.

The oil shock is leading to oil being replaced, especially in transport, with electricity and other fuels, just as past oil shocks drove lasting reductions in consumption, he said. “The shock doesn’t delay the transition – it reinforces it,” he added.

Demand takes a hit

While demand for oil has fallen significantly, supplies have fallen even further. Supply in March was 10 million barrels a day less than February, the IEA said, calling it the “largest disruption in history”.

This forecast relies on the assumption that regular deliveries of oil and gas from the Middle East will resume by the middle of the year, the IEA said, although the prospects for this “remain unclear at this stage”.

    Last month, US Energy Secretary Chris Wright told the CERAWeek oil industry conference that prices were not high enough to lead to permanent reductions in demand for oil, known as demand destruction.

    But the IEA said on Wednesday that “demand destruction will spread as scarcity and higher prices persist”.

    Industries contributing to weaker demand for oil include Asian petrochemical producers, who are cutting production as oil supplies dry up, the report said, while consumers are cutting back on liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), which is mainly used as a cooking gas in developing countries, the IEA said.

    Flight cancellations caused by the war have dampened demand for oil-based jet fuel, the IEA said. As well as cancellations caused by risk from the conflict itself, airports have warned that fuel shortages could lead to disruption.

    Across the world, governments, businesses and consumers have sought to reduce their oil use after the war. The government of Pakistan has cut the speed limit on its roads, so that people drive at a more fuel-efficient speed, and Laos has encouraged people to work from home to preserve scarce petrol and diesel.

    Nepal’s EV revolution pays off as oil crisis causes pain at the pumps

    Consumers in Bangladesh are seeking electric vehicles (EVs) to avoid fuel queues and, in Nigeria, more people are seeking to replace petrol and diesel generators with solar panels, Climate Home News has reported.

    In the longer term, the European Union is considering cutting taxes on electricity to help it replace fossil fuels and France is promoting EVs and heat pumps.

    IEA urged to help “future-proof” economies

    Meanwhile, the IEA came under fire last week from energy security experts, including former military chiefs, who signed an open letter in which they accused the agency of offering “only a temporary response to turbulent markets”, calling for stronger structural action “to future-proof our economies”.

    They said that besides releasing emergency oil stocks and offering advice on how to reduce oil demand in the short term, the IEA should show countries how to reduce their exposure to volatile oil and gas markets.

    The IEA has also been under pressure from the Trump administration to talk less about the transition away from fossil fuels.

    This article was amended on 15 April 2026 to correct the drop in 2026 forecast oil demand from “nearly a billion” to “nearly a million”

    The post IEA slashes pre-war oil demand forecast by nearly a million barrels per day appeared first on Climate Home News.

    IEA slashes pre-war oil demand forecast by nearly a million barrels per day

    Continue Reading

    Climate Change

    Iowa Moves to Shield Farmers, Ethanol Plants, From Lawsuits Over Emissions

    Published

    on

    Climate lawsuits are a largely nonexistent threat to farmers in the state, but ethanol producers could benefit from the law.

    DES MOINES, Iowa—Aaron Lehman has many concerns about the fate of Iowa’s farmers. Climate lawsuits aren’t one.

    Iowa Moves to Shield Farmers, Ethanol Plants, From Lawsuits Over Emissions

    Continue Reading

    Trending

    Copyright © 2022 BreakingClimateChange.com